Sactown Royalty: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

The Beno Question

I looked over TZ's Beno Udrih poll this morning. Very simple. So why have I did I have so much trouble coming to a conclusion, and why did I almost immediately second guess my decision (I chose 6th man)?

Beno Udrih is quite possibly the most intriguing King of the moment. We know that our future will have Kevin Martin and Spencer Hawes in it, and it won't have Mike Bibby or (most likely) Ron Artest. But what say ye about Beno?

Had we drafted Udrih we would be calling for ROY right now. And while he is a 3rd year man he really does not have a ton of experience. For all of our disdain for some of GP's recent free agent acquisitions, we sure have to be thrilled with this deal, right? As I had mentioned in an earlier thread, had Petrie pulled off a draft day deal that brought Udrih here for a future 2nd round pick we would really love him right now. Well, we have him and we didn't even have to give up a pick.

And the offense looks much better when he is on the floor. The team assist numbers are better (though still not good), and the ball movement is getting better and better. So maybe I want to change my vote and make him my PG of the present and future.

But I am really intigued by Derrick Rose, and to a lesser extent O.J. Mayo. So is that the rub? I like Beno but he's not a franchise changer like the above mention duo could be?

So then where do I place Udrih amongst next year's prospects? I don't like him as much as Mayo or Rose but do I like him better than Darren Collison? Jarreyd Bayless? Ty Lawson? Does having Udrih enable me instead to set my sights on a big guy like Michael Beasley? Darrell Arthur? Roy Hibbert?

In the end, I could go in any direction on this question. Perhaps the answer will be clearer in a couple of months, after I have seen the best and worst of Beno. But I don't want to wait a couple of months. I want to know now. I am counting on my fellow StR brethren to shed some light upon me and show me the way. Kusian, Otis, pookey, dalt, murph, kingme, kingme18, Brother Hedo, Identity916, Carl, Rhonnda, Mityt, OBB, cdoggy, louis, and all the rest of you (and even you, TZ), please help me in my time of indecision and enlighten me with your intelligent and informed points of view (or just make something up and lob it in here anyway).

0 recs  |  Comment 49 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Re: The Beno Question
Very nice entry Section. I must admit that I have been pleasantly surprised by the young Slovenian's performance as of late as well. He has a ways to go in terms of understanding the game better, but that will come with playing time and experience. However, Im sure he learned a thing or two being taught by Popovich everyday in practice while with the Spurs. I think it is a bit early to label him the "PG of the Kings Future", but he went from being cut by the Milwaukee Bucks ago to becoming the most intruiging storyline (along with the devlopment of Spencer Hawes)of the year for the Kings.

I know its a bit early, but onto the upcoming year and where we may turn in the draft, especially if Beno continues to improve. Rose and Mayo seem to be "cant miss talents" who Petrie would HAVE to take, regardless of Beno's performance the rest of the year. However, As of right now (I know its early and there is alot of hoops to be played) the Kings better start looking Beasley's way. The Kings havnt had an athletic big since Pre-Injury Webber and thats exactly what were missin

by Hoops916 on Nov 27, 2007 9:01 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I think your strand about Beno certainly sitting below Mayo and Rose (I'd add the combo guard Eric Gordon from Indiana) but hovering around or above the second-tier PG prospects is on point at this time. If you pick #2 and Beasley's gone, I think you have to take Rose or Mayo as things stand now, unless you're New Orleans, Utah or Memphis. But if you can get Udrih a fair contract (I'd guess something less than Ridnour's $6.5 million per year -- maybe the midlevel or just less) and you're either picking #1 (dreamers, us) or below the Rose-Mayo-Gordon threshold, you've got to go big again or small forward (with Ron's flight).

There's a lot of college and pro basketball to be played, of course, but it helps get us in the right frame of mind about this player (or these players) in looking to the summer.

by Ziller on Nov 27, 2007 9:38 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I don't know what's wrong with you guys: when I found out the Kinds signed Beno, I flipped out.

I jumped up in the middle of my lab and did a dance, and would have flipped if certain knee, back and ankle ailments hadn't made it then-currently impossible.

C'mon, this is a guy Popovich was grooming to be his second guard - his guy off the bench, the guy that would be Parker and Ginobli combined. Sure, Pop gave up on him, but I always thought the poor play was a result of not being given the playing time to be able to find his own role, of which Pop has a noted history in doing with lesser rookies (see: James "Flight" White and Luis "I now rock with the Rockets" Scola).

I strongly disfavor the "home-grown" versus "brought-in" talent analysis - all our talent has been brought in. Name a player outside of Kevin-Garcia-Williams-Shawes (aka, the new kids on the block) worth talking about in our recent history that was homegrown: Peja. That's it. Bibby, Artest, Miller, Webber, Vlade, Christie, everyone came from someplace else. Sactown was the place players came to and realized was home, not the place players were drafted into and

As for Douby's necessary regression for Beno's success, that doesn't bother me much either. Douby was never a point guard, maybe having another real point on the roster will let him flower into the tweener waiting inside.

Your concerns about him not being a game-changer can't be the reason for you not being super-gung-ho for him: no one on our roster is a game-changer (save for a miraculously-motivated Ron-Ron). Hell, very few people in the league are gamechangers.

Though, you do bring up a great question, I can't wait to here what everyone else has to say.

by iashwash on Nov 27, 2007 9:52 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Kevin Martin is home grown, and to be fair, due to our 8 consecutive playoff appearances we really have not had the draft picks to home grow our talent.

I like the fact that you're excited about Beno and it has me thinking why the hell not? Why can't he be that guy? Why not get excited about him? It would be awesome if he turns out to be good/great, and we don't have anything invested in him if he winds up only fair.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Nov 27, 2007 10:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Nice post, Section. I'm on a deadline today so can't give this the thought it deserves.  I'll just say that PGs are very, very hard to find, and they take a few years (unless your Chris Paul) to develop.  I just don't think we know enough about Beno at this point.  He has not played enough consistent NBA minutes to make a very good assessment.  However, any dude that drop 27 on the Spurs probably has some potential ;)

by Kusian on Nov 27, 2007 10:34 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
You damn republicans and responsbility.
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Nov 27, 2007 12:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
At this point he sure looks more like "the man" than Douby thus far in his short career. Granted he is more experienced, so I have not given up on Douby but Beno doesn't have big game minute experience either and he is preforming far superior. As long as he's cheap I am all for continuing the Beno experiment. The real answers about whether Beno is part of the future here will be answered when Bibby comes back. Without question Bibby will start when he is healthy enough and what Beno does then will be very telling. Some may argue (especially if Beno does well in the next month) if you bring Bibby back at all, but come on, you have to.

Bottom line, Beno has potential but as now constructed as a player he might not be the best fit. IF he can learn the system (whatever that may be), improve his skills and decision making, and continue to shoot well then why not? He is cheaper and just as productive as Mike. It just seems wierd comparing MB10 and Udrih but there you go. Bibby is not part of the Kings future at his current price tag so you have to assume Udrih is. Who woulda thunk that we'd be talking about Beno a month ago...sheesh.

by Mityt on Nov 27, 2007 10:40 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I like your comparison between Bibby and Beno.  One thing that also sounds good about having Beno out there is taking away shots that Bibby would normally take and giving them to Martin and others.

by thekangarooster on Nov 27, 2007 4:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Beno, I think, has much better point guard skills than Bibby - and he's younger, faster, and more athletic. He's already shown that he is a far superior ball-handler and penetrator. (Man, I had a total South Park moment after that sentence.) For example, Mike Bibby ain't going end-to-end and finishing (with an "And 1") on anybody at this point in his career.  Hell, he's lucky if he can get to the rim; and when he does, he rarely, if ever, finishes.  

The question is can Beno become the clutch, consistent shooter that Mike has been throughout his career (last year notwithstanding.) Mike can still win a game by himself with his shooting prowess.  That's something not too many guys can do. Certainly, I don't think that Beno can - at least, not at this point.

by Kusian on Nov 27, 2007 5:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Whoa Whoa whoa... Lets not run and get Beno tattoos on our bicepts quite yet...He had a really good game versus the Spurs (possible revenge motive), and he has played WELL in most of his other games. Lets not get over our heads yet and ordain him the second coming while labeling him superior to Bibby along the way.

by Hoops916 on Nov 27, 2007 6:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Not a superior player.  He's just has superior ball-handling, finishing, and passing skills. At the end of the day, though, Mike has proven himself a game-changer.

Re-read what I wrote. I never said Beno was superior or the second-coming. But I do know basketball, and Beno has better true point guard skills.

by Kusian on Nov 27, 2007 7:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
The one thing you can't compare between Bibby and Udrih is who is the better value. No contest on that one.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Nov 27, 2007 8:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I think that's the real key to Beno's value Kusian. Just his ball-handling ability alone prevents the Kings from going "square peg in round hole" - otherwise known as the Douby/Garcia PG experiment. It allows other players to play to their strengths a bit more.

by otis29 on Nov 28, 2007 5:41 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Right now I take him. Why not? He's gonna be half the price of Bibby in free agency, and while we might lose some clutch shooting, shouldn't that become Martin's responsibility longterm?

I look at Beno right now and watch what he's given this team and with out him on the floor we are 2-4, with him at the point we are 3-4. I know it's not a huge difference but I don't think we win against San Antonio or Detroit without him. If he was ready to play against Cleveland we would have won. Without him we got blown out by the Suns. Some of his early losses I figure have to relate to not understanding his teammates and coach completely. I expect him to become very consistent but if he does this we could very well be out of the Rose conversation. I'm not saying we're gonna make the playoffs but we definitely won't be the worst team in the division. Time will tell.

Regardless of what happens he's my highlight of the year. I'm going to watch Beno and Martin(chin up son!), and everyone else will either rise to the excitement or frustrate the hell out of me.

Last note: JUSTIN WILLIAMS IS MAKING MORE MONEY THAN BENO! How many players in this league are doing what he is for $600K? If we pay Moore $5Mill for 3 years, can't we do the same for Beno?

by tokyo on Nov 27, 2007 10:37 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I like Beno, I wish he would pass a little bit more but he gives the Kings the point guard they need to deal Bibby. The Bibby debate is legendary here at StR and I have always sided on keeping him because there was no one else. I think Beno can be a legitimate starting point unlike Salmons or Garcia. I think Beno could also be devastating off the bench in a Bobby Jackson type role if the Kings are lucky enough to get Mayo or Rose.

Beno is playing himself into a long term contract somewhere and unfortunately the Kings don't have Larry Bird rights to him so he would cost the Kings a portion of the mid-level exemption to keep. Let's keep our fingers crossed that the Kings can deal Bibby for Varejeo and an expiring Ira Newble contract. This deal would give the Kings the rebounder and shot blocker the desperate need and the space necessary to sign Beno or Artest to a long term deal while staying under the dreaded luxury threshold.

The Kings aren't going to be great but adding a stud like Varejeo would cure a lot of ills. With a strong draft they could be back on track a little quicker and definitely be in great shape during the great salary purge of 2010.

We are slipping into the NBA abyss.

by jjham15 on Nov 27, 2007 10:38 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I don't want Anderson for 8-9 million a year. Not unless we can chop a few heads-o-the-hydra off. I think the Kings front-court woes can be solved in house (cough... Williams cough cough... Shawes). Just to get rid of Bibby's contract would be ALMOST satisfactory for me. I ideally would like young players or draft picks. No vets need apply.

by Mityt on Nov 27, 2007 10:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Varejeo's name should NEVER be used in the same sentence as stud!!! I believe he averaged something like 6pts and 6rebs a game last year! He looked half way DECENT cause he had King James working with him!... Hell, look how good Mikki Moore looked with Kidd..Same type of deal

by Hoops916 on Nov 27, 2007 10:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Agreed. But if you had to choose MM or AV?? An easy choice isn't it. If Varejao would sign for MLE then hell yeah! He will not so enjoy Europe AV.

by Mityt on Nov 27, 2007 10:49 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I think you should capitalize that last phrase. Then we can celebrate the Great Salary Purge of 2010 as if it is going to be a landmark moment in Kings history, the time when we will witness the organizaiton forever relinquish the yoke of pricey mediocrity.

by NYCFan on Nov 27, 2007 10:52 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Beno's been playing great, he's one of very few pleasant surprises this year so far.  Even if he shows he can be our PG for now and the future, I say you still have to draft Rose or Mayo if given the opportunity(Beasely is going #1 I think and we wont likely pick there), but however you cut this situation Beno's success only helps us, either as a player or an asset in the trade market.
  on a dif note, it's actually been fun the last couple of games noticing, even if we lost the games, how hard this group plays out there.  I dont remember exactly, but the Kings last year had already given up on Muss at this point right?

by joeytothelimit on Nov 27, 2007 10:55 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I was no Muss fan, but I will say that, no, the guys did not give up on him at this point.  The Kings played very hard last year.  Despite that fact, though, they lost a ton of close games. In fact, I'm pretty sure that TZ did a post during the off-season that showed the Kings should have had a better win-loss record based on their point deferential with opponents.

by Kusian on Nov 27, 2007 1:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I'm excited about Beno.  The things is, when choosing a point guard you have to look at talent and style of play.  Even if Beno turns out to be an above average player at his position, he's still a scoring point guard, and sticking with a player like that as the head of our team could affect Petrie's personnel decisions at the other positions as well.  Petrie seems to have a blueprint in mind, at least style-wise, and it will be interesting to see if Beno fits into it.

by Michael Beasley on Nov 27, 2007 11:31 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
By the way, does anyone know if Beno is restricted/unrestricted this summer?

by Michael Beasley on Nov 27, 2007 11:43 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Unrestricted, and we don't have Bird rights. Which means unless some miracle deal gets Sac under the salary cap, we can pay midlevel at the max. Most teams will be the same situation, and I can't see any teams with room giving up $6.5 million + to get Beno.

by Ziller on Nov 27, 2007 11:55 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
The Kings could easily sign Beno at a deal similar to John Salmons yes? (This is of course assuming they want to.)
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Nov 27, 2007 12:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
They gave SAR and Moore this kind of money right? I'd be shocked and really irritated if they didn't give it to Beno

by kingme on Nov 27, 2007 5:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Okay section your question deserves an answer. I suppose it would depend on how Beno plays for the rest of the season. While I loved Beno's 27 as much as anyone else, it's also true some of those miracle flips may not go in the rest of the season. The whole team was jacked up to play the Spurs, and I don't think Beno was out playing for revenge; he just played as hard as anybody else.

As far as the future the big college names have been mentioned (rose mayo beasley gordon) but other than that who really knows. My opinion now, and always has been, is that you acquire superstars through the draft. The days of signing Shaquille O'Neal for 120 cool one's are over.

I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Nov 27, 2007 12:06 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
The problem with even trying to analyze anything beyond an actual veteran's performance is lack of experience. Though having a new coach, and our prone for injuries even that is difficult to thoroughly analyze with this team.

None of our young talent are proven performers. Except maybe Kevin Martin. Though the only thing he has proven is his ability to score. We're hoping he transitions into a complete figure, but if he can't play comfortably out of his current style we may have to accept a 20 point 5 rebound performance, though I'm sure everyone is hoping with me this would be an extremely conservative estimate.

It's one month into the season, not really time to speculate on who can do what yet.  After the all-star break we'll have better answers.

In terms of who seems to be developing well? Beno seems to do better as he gets more comfortable with the team.  Is he our savior?  Check back after the all-star break.

Douby's minutes have been limited. I only hope he hasn't been given up on completely. Garcia seems to have the will to do whatever he wants, but unfortunately that gets in his way when there are better alternatives see last drive of trailblazers game

Watkins/Williams desperately need more minutes.  Thankfully Hawes is getting some much needed minutes. Unfortunately I guess there just aren't enough minutes to give out.  Trade Reef/thomas for some draft picks or something, I don't know what else to say... Let the younger talent develop, and if it comes at the expense of some games at least we'll get a higher draft pick. The Free Williams post couldn't have been more on point. To me he seems to be a taller more agressive posting Artest...but maybe I'm just biased cause I really love his game.

This whole talk of lottery is starting to seem out of reach... check nba.com standings... there are a lot of teams worse off than us, though it's not entirely impossible to end with a good pick. With that said if we are willing to take a step back if it could even be considered that... by letting our younger bigs develop at the expense of losing the older ones, we may give up enough games to be a lottery team.

Quick synopsis since my thoughts are all over the place blame my boss for making me the office barista.

Team has players with MAJOR potential, Beno, Garcia, Williams specifically.  The team may have some other great talent we aren't very aware of Hawes, Watkins, Douby in this category.
Some people just need to be let go for one reason or another Reef to a team that can appreciate him, and Thomas to the d-league if I had my way. Finally some people we can never really figure out because of all the trade-rumors Bibby, Miller, Artest.

I didn't even mension salmons and mikki, but I would like to see them stick around assuming mikki's butterfingers lose their grease. We will need some sort of veteran presence/leadership on the floor no matter how young we go. Which is why I still miss Corliss Williamson.

Did I forget any thing? I did go way off topic...either way back to work I go, maybe I'll edit this entire post later when my head is clear of outside distractions.

by dkons21 on Nov 27, 2007 12:14 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Editorial note: I wish we could do that (and retrive lost diaries too TZ).

As far as your post there is alot of good stuff to chew on.

  • Forget Trading K9--banish him to wearing civvies forever
  • Trade Reef to Orlando
  • Trade Mikki to Charlotte
  • Trade Mike to ?????
  • Trade Ron to NY

As far as Kevin's upside is concerned that will play itself out. Rather than speculate, which I do enough of, I'll sit this out. It's hard to judge where Kevin will end up.

With regards to Beno you have to give it time. There's a reason you signed the guy for the minimum. Let that answer sort itself out. It will.

I'm not sure I'd agree Garcia has major potential. But he has plenty. But most NBA players have potential, which is why they're in the league, and most on any given night can play like all-stars. The problem, as always, is consistency. The epicenter of all issue's I suppose.

I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Nov 27, 2007 12:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Beno has the potential to be more of a Bobby Jackson type.  Jackson was a point guard who could come off the bench and provide energy and scoring.  He could run the point, but he wasn't a natural distributor.  He pressured on defense, but he was hardly a shut-down defender.  Thus, he could fill in as a starter quite well in the short term, but less so in the long term.  I think the same holds for Beno, which is why he is ideally a sixth man,but also a more-than-capable fill-in at starter.
Visit sunny and beautiful Movie City USA.

by DB on Nov 27, 2007 1:44 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
We should all be a lot more excited about Beno than we have been. When I read that we had signed him my first reaction was, When the f*ck did this guy go on waivers?
I remember being pissed off about how good San Antonio is/was when their recent draft pick (Beno) looked like he could also start for their team a year or two ago. That being said, I should be much more excited about his long-term potential for this team than I actually am. Maybe its because I was really really jacked up about getting Rose in the draft, and now with Beno making this team more complete, that seems to be a much more distant possibility than it was 2 weeks ago.

by CAB on Nov 27, 2007 2:14 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
At least you were right on Beno and I wasn't. My reaction was what good will this do? (As exemplified better by something else which I won't link to again.)

As far as Rose we agree he is EXACTLY what this team needs. A Pass first PG who has all the abilities of a leader. Yep, that's the ticket. He's big probably could be in the same mold as Deron Williams. Can you go wrong with that given how few players on this group have such poor instincts in giving the ball up?

I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Nov 27, 2007 2:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
So is a Beno in the hand better than a Rose in the bush?
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Nov 27, 2007 3:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
A Beno with a Rosebush in hand would be the best.

by Kfan in Korea on Nov 27, 2007 4:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
We are set at SG.

Early returns on Hawes have me hopeful that we are in good shape at C.

We are currently set at SF, but you have to assume Artest will opt out. That leaves Garcia and an older Salmons. I think that is at least a Doug Christie level 5th starter.

So, as we all know our biggest needs are PF and PG. I think Beno gives us the flexibility to focus on the PF 1st(Artest to NY for Lee anyone?)

Trade Artest and Bibby before the deadline for expiring contracts, draft picks and hopefully a young PF. Then you're lookin at a young lineup of Beno, Martin, Garcia, (Lee/Ty Thomas/?) and Hawes.

At draft time you can take the best guy/guys available. Let gel for a year or two til the hydra comes off the books and sign a stud vet where ever we are weakest to put us over the top.

by Kfan in Korea on Nov 27, 2007 4:21 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
First of all, great post...

In the poll, I chose the `Yes, he's our PG of the future'. I honestly thought I was the only one crazy enough to select this but was pleasantly surprised that 32% of you guys agreed with me. Yes, Mayo and Rose are very interesting prospects but if ever we do get the number #1 pick, Beasley should be our guy. Beno, from time to time, has showed that he can run our team. His last game clearly showed that he can be special especially if motivated. A player who averages 15 5 5 is, for me, a borderline all-star. Beno is averaging 14.5 3 and 4.4. For someone who was never a full-time starting PG and who's on a team that has yet to find its identity, those numbers are pretty good (Bibby's career avg is 16.8 3.3 6.2 and he's a lottery pick!). He may have not played valuable minutes as a Spur but there is no doubt in my mind that he has learned a lot from Pop (plus he plays Tony and co. in practice). How the Spurs thought Vaughn or undrafted Darius Washington was a better backup PG option is beyond me. Let's face it, aside from Mike, he is the best PG on our team. We should all know by now that Douby and Garcia at PG is a horrible idea, I'd rather start Salmon than them. In fact, if I had to choose between Douby and Beno, I'd sign Beno in a heartbeat. Plus, he's only 25 years old! (Heck, Josh Howard is already 27 years old). Now let me ask you guys a question, assuming we lose Mike and Ron in the near future, which is more bearable 1) having Beno as your starting PG with Beasley and Hawes as your twin towers or 2) paring up Kev with Rose or Mayo with our Hydra manning  the PF position? Regardless of whether Beasley is still available or not, we really should draft another big in this draft unless Mayo or Rose is available of course.

by kingme on Nov 27, 2007 5:07 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Let's face it, aside from Mike, he is the best PG on our team. We should all know by now that Douby and Garcia at PG is a horrible idea, I'd rather start Salmon than them.
Okay ,other than Bibby and Udrih, is there ANOTHER PG on this roster? (The answer is no. The "other" PG departed with Orien Greene.)
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Nov 28, 2007 3:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I thought they were grooming Douby to be a PG? LOL

by kingme on Nov 28, 2007 5:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
One very encouraging stat within a stat last night -  Beno had 27 points, intimating that he is a shoot first PG. But he did it on 12 shots (plus 9 free throws). Six Kings had at least 9 shot attempts last night, Artest leading with 14. I the assist numbers don't tell the whole story, the distribution of shots does show that an offense with Udrih in it is much more effective than an offense without him.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Nov 27, 2007 5:35 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I'd agree if we could get a player like Rose or mayo that'd be great.but rather than speculate on all the salary hypotheticals involved in trading up towards the 'new perfect' roster I'll say this:

Beno seems to have good, but not great talent at the p.g. at this point.One could argue that there are more talented options out there for the King's future.

but as someone who's seen alot of talented people(in my case, musicians)who never could realize their great potential because they:
1)Could never focus enough to gain the discipline to let their talents manifest, or;
2)Couldn't get their heads out of their asses long enough to get out of their own way & let things develop naturally;

I have to say I like how Beno has responded to the pressure of the situation. What seperates a good player from a great one isn't just talent; it's the right mental attitude.Score one for Beno in that direction.
(Note to Beno:Now live up to that. I don't like to be prooved wrong, dang it. )

by Rhondda Nunes on Nov 27, 2007 5:44 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I haven't watched enough of Beno to form a decent opinion, but I'll chip in a couple observations:

Beno is a good ballhandler, decent passer and is a better pure point guard than anyone else on the team.  Beno's shot seems inconsistent, but Bibby has the same problem.  

Beno shoots too much and isn't terribly quick.  Beno looks to me like a starter on a bad team and a bench guy on a decent squad.  Unlike most of the other folks here, I DON'T think you spend the MLE re-signing him.  Beno is a three year, $12 million (total) level player at this point in his career.

Someone mentioned Anderson Varejao.  I'll give you two sets of numbers from 2006-2007.  You tell me which are Varejao's and which came from our own Kenny Thomas.
a) 23.9min  .476fg%  2.4orb  6.7rb  6.8ppg  0.6bpg
b) 22.9min  .482fg%  2.2orb  6.1rb  6.1ppg  0.3bpg

I'm not saying Varejao is as bad as K9, but those numbers are way, way too close to spend ANY money on Varejao.

by Carl on Nov 27, 2007 7:30 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
He's not super quick; but he's not slow. Certainly, he is quicker than Bibby.  What's more important for a PG is getting to where he wants to be.  There are many point guards that can beat Nash in a 40.  Doesn't mean they can get to where they want/need to be on the court. (And, God no, I'm not comparing Beno to Nash!)

In terms of MLE, we don't have even close to enough date to make a determination at this point.  To say yea or nay at this point is just kinda silly.

Getting back to Nash, though; let's not forget at year 3 people thought he was a bust.

by Kusian on Nov 27, 2007 7:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Like what I said earlier, we reward Moore and Salmons with the MLE and yet tell Beno to take 12 mil for 3 years. If not, go look for another team that will give you that money? I'm sure a lot of teams need help at the PG position (e.g. Clippers)

by kingme on Nov 27, 2007 8:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Let me rewrite that.

Like what I said earlier, we reward Moore and Salmons with the MLE and yet tell Beno to take 12 mil for 3 years or else go look for another team that will give you that money? I'm sure a lot of teams that need help at the PG position would jump at the opportunity of acquiring him (e.g. Clippers)

by kingme on Nov 27, 2007 8:29 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I like Beno alot, always have. Is he the point guard of the future? Depends on how he develops and how Sac develops/utilizes him. He's more the point of the future than Bibby I assume. Let's hope when Bibby comes back, Beno gets to keep developing(playing). Plugging a recently injured/healed player back into a starting lineup after a long absence can backfire (Webber), and should never be done if the team is clicking. If they are clicking (depends on your expectations I guess but against the Spurs, they were clickin'!) I do think Beno is good enough to start alot this year..over Bibby even. I mean you'll never know until you let it happen and what a great opportunity to let Bibby be an awesome sixth man! Bibby deserves starts, especially to raise trade value, but..? As far as next year's prospects, I do think you have to take a Derrick Rose with a high pick.

That brings me to my next point. With a high pick don't you have to take an athletic big(PF)?? To me that's Sac's BIGgest weakness. A big, 6'9+ (isn't Beasley too shortish-6'7?), athletic, tough, defensive, rebounding, shot blocking, rebounding, shot blocking, rebounding..oh sorry, I was getting excited..power forward! I sure wish we could see Justin Williams or even Watkins enough to know what we have there. If they are breakout worthy like Udrih?/or Udrih?/and Udrih?, it reveals alot about what kind of draft pick Sac needs.

So? Who knows? When the time comes I hope it's all as clear as possible for Petrie. For now, I think Sac's safer with Udrih and ?(insert solid veteran/youngster PG from trade here) at the point than with hydra at cower backward. [Sorry to whoever trademarked the ingenious "cower forward"] So I'm following the college bigs unless we trade for..um, Okafor?

If you guys think Rose will go in the top...what, top three picks and Sac gets in there...OH MY! Can you imagine the pressure?!      

by busybe on Nov 27, 2007 9:13 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
I didn't know how to answer the poll. I think there should have been one more option: Too early to tell.

Only 8 games into Beno's first season with the Kings, it's way too early to say if he's going to be the franchise PG for the future. I will say that he is the best PG we have had since Bibby and Bobby Jackson and probably (amazingly) the BEST "pure" point guard the Kings have had in a long while. He runs the team very well and is pretty good on the fast break. I would still rather have Mayo or Rose but if we don't get them, he may be the future PG. Time will tell. He is still young. If you look at the stats for Steve Nash in his first three seasons per 40 minutes, Beno is doing just about as good and Steve was a starter in his third season. Beno is no Nash, but he could keep improving each season to become the "Future" point guard for the Kings.

He can shoot, and he looks great in a suit. Hey, everybody - It's REGGIE TIME!

by dalt99 on Nov 27, 2007 10:45 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
i wish i had beno before i ate del taco tonight. on a more serious (though no less true) note, beno's early returns are awesome for a waiver wire minimum salary pick up.  the 15 5 5 got mo williams 60 mill last year, but they were in a bind. i'd rather have beno and frontcourt talent than mikki moore, kenny thomas and derrick rose.
Proud to be TZ's hero. http://crescendaofmediocrity.blogspot.com

by MILKSHAKE on Nov 28, 2007 3:46 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The Beno Question
Well stated. Beno and frontcourt talent is way greater than Mikki Moore, Kenny Thomas, Shareef and Derrick Rose.

by busybe on Nov 28, 2007 12:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.
Start posting about the Kings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Eastern_logs_small
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Week 4
200751153242283_small
That was then...
Spaceshaolinninja_small
NCAA Hoops Preview from the Kings' Perspective
Zebulon_small
Jason Thompson, Foul Machine
Eastern_logs_small
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Week 3

Recent FanPosts

Inigo_small
This weeks Asinine trade thread Nov 23
Tyreke_yahoo_small
Future Pillars of the Franchise
Tyreke_yahoo_small
The League is Catching Up to Jason Thompson
Small
Spencer Hawes's failing grade
Small
Searching for a backup center
Small
If the Kings Lose Tonight it's All My Fault...
S5000963_small
Break Down of New Possible Trade

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Local Sponsors


Editor

Loofie_small Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Authors

Banana2_small Exhibit G