Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UEFA Champions League 2012: Chelsea Wins on Penalties

Game 67 - at Atlanta

The super-long and detailed game threads take a lot of time. The team is teetering on the brink of vacation, so it doesn't exactly behoove me to spend lots of energy and time telling you all about Zaza Pachulia and Josh Smith.

So unless a winning streak delivers some tenacity in the playoff surge, the game threads will exist in a more casual, unstructured sense.

Atlanta does almost nothing well. Their "strength" is forcing turnovers, and they are tied for 7th in the league in that category. Otherwise, the offense is terrible thanks to incredibly bad shooting, the defensive rebounding is nonexistant, and they give up a lot of free throws (26.5 per 100 FGAs - slightly better than Orlando's 28.6).

Of course, the Kings' calling card has been drawing fouls, led by Kevin Martin. Speed is #6 in foul-drawing among guards this season, behind Corey Maggette, Steve Francis, Chauncy Billups, Dwyane Wade, and Andre Iguodala. But John Salmons, Ron Artest, Shareef Abdur-Rahim and Mike Bibby all draw fouls better than average for their positions as well, providing tons of charity ammunition for an above-average FT shooting team.

Sacramento's other strengths? Protecting the ball and forcing turnovers. During that five-game slide into Bolivian, the Kings coughed the ball up 91 times while their opponents suffered from 77 turnovers. Against Orlando, the Kings had nine turnovers to the Magic's 18.

The Kings mediocre shooting percentages, coupled with their inability to stop the opponent from shooting at a high clip, make turnovers a big, big issue. When you can't outshoot your opponent (like the Kings could earlier this decade), you have to get more shots off. Without a stud offensive rebounder who gets playing time, that means winning the turnover battle.

The Kings are 3.5-point favorites. I think Speed should be able to exploit Atlanta's mediocre backcourt and get to the line. If Bibby has another bad night, well then I just don't know. Hopefully Shareef will get the start again - no ill wishes to the in-pain Kenny Thomas, but there's no one in a Hawks jersey who can guard Reef. The Kings should attack the post with Artest and Reef often, and let Martin operate on Josh Childress and Salim Stoudemire. Salmons has played well lately, and he's better than any Hawks sub.

On talent, the Kings are much better (even if Joe Johnson were healthy). If they can execute at even 75%, this should be a win and an easy cover.

(Of course, 75% is a lot to ask.)

Game at 4. (This is the last weekday game that starts before 5, a nice note for those of us who work.)

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
Don't be shocked to see brad have a great game. He has played very well since coming to sacramento anyway in atlanta. He showed signs of breaking out of it vs orlando too. Doubt it will be more than a 1 game resurgence. There are real teams out west awaiting our beloved purple n gold.
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 19, 2007 12:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
i think it would be completely selfish of us to make the playoffs and deny the world of a dallas-golden state first round match-up, phoenix-denver wouldn't be too bad to see either.

bring on the lottery!

may danny ainge be punished with the fourth pick for spending time with kevin durants family

by CrownUs93 on Mar 19, 2007 3:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
Well if there is 1 benefit to being bad out east @ least the majority of this fan base wont have to see it. Now i want this group to miss the playoffs & for musselman to be fired. This is pathetic. Losing to the hawks by 30 is unacceptable. Quitting on your coach or not.
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 19, 2007 5:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
tomorrow is paper bag day in sacramento

by CrownUs93 on Mar 19, 2007 6:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
I'm still pouting because none of you commented on my Photoshop bag pic from days ago : )

http://www.sactownroyalty.com/story/2007/3/14/16549/4812#commenttop

He's pesky I tell ya.

by pyro on Mar 20, 2007 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
I commented but i do got a question...who is that chic?
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 20, 2007 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
That "chic" is "Sign Lady." She is an awesome fan and one of those people that makes this joint special. : ) I kinda feel bad for bagging her pic because she will support the team proudly no matter what.
He's pesky I tell ya.

by pyro on Mar 20, 2007 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
You got the bravery part right. I dont mind that the kings are a bad dysfunctional crappy team. I just mind having to watch it.
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 20, 2007 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
Thanks for hopping on the bag thing.  Thats awesome.

by Chris The Greek on Mar 20, 2007 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
You know you suck when josh smith misses a trip dub cuz he cant score worth shit. It definitely is paper bag day tomorrow.

It's almost as bad when zaza pachulia drops 20+ on you.

I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 19, 2007 6:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
I still say the heart of this problem starts with the maloofs not musselman. As crappy a job as he is doing @ the moment. He just isnt a good fit for this team.
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 19, 2007 7:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
Tell me what the Maloofs have done that make u believe that they are the heart of this problem.

That's because YOU CAN'T

Terps and Kings 4 ever

by kingme18 on Mar 19, 2007 8:17 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
I can & have. I dont think they understand that talent dictates how you play. You can stress defense all you want. But unless you get 5 players of artest's caliber playing defense you wont improve. Especially if bibby & miller are playing 2 pivotal positions of importance. The maloofs fired adelman for the wrong reasons. They thought a new coach could stress things bringing improvement. However improvement comes from talent not a new vision. This shit aboutlarry brown getting mike bibby to play defense is just that. Larry Brown can say & do whatever he wants. International ball is not the nba.
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 19, 2007 8:25 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
Ok maybe not even artest's caliber.... i was being overzealous to make a point. Bibby isnt committed to playing D yet bibby is definitely 1 of the maloof's guys. I dont think they really get how the nba works. They're still new to this ownership thing particularily in the running of the franchise. Musselman doesnt necessarily have a good repoire with these players. This team has quit on him. He isnt a good fit for this team and these guys dont like him. The maloofs hired musselman. Thats why i put blame mostly on them. I'm not saying petrie or anyone else isnt to blame...im just saying this is their blame to enjoy mostly. They wanted artest & musselman. Well i hope they enjoy it.
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 19, 2007 8:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
As someone who has hired and fired a large number of people, I will come to the defense of the Maloofs in this case. By all accounts Muss got a raw deal in G.S., he had their franchise on the right path and if given another year he may have been able to get them to the play-offs. Muss then went on to coach under Mike Fratello, who is known as a great defensive coach and he should have learned a lot. His father was an NBA coach, he interviewed extremely well and he is young enough to lead this team for a long time.

Now just because a guy brings you a nice resume doesn't mean he's worth a shit. Muss does not have the coaching skills to make up for a lack of talent and the talent level on this team is marginal at best.

We have no rebounders, no shot blockers and we are not athletic at all. If you want to blame someone for this team you have to blame Petrie.

The Maloofs stepped in and nixed the Bibby trade to the Lakers but personally I fail to see how that trade made us better even in the least. Kwame Brown, Farmar and a late first rounder is junk. Thank God the Maloofs stepped in.

Now saying all of this I believe the Maloofs should be blamed for allowing the relationship with Rick Adeleman to deteriorate. I blame them for the Ron Artest debacle and I will blame them if Petrie leaves.

If Adeleman was still here I guarantee we would be the 7th seed, Muss has cost us a lot of games with his moronic moves and lack of adjustments.

Artest is like Webber, Vernon Maxwell, Jim Jackson, Bonzi Wells etc., etc., etc. How were the Maloofs to know he would be the one to finally make the franchise look bad. Remember, there was like 10 other teams willing to give up major talent for Artest.

If we lose Petrie, even with the mistakes he has made recently then I think we should burn the Maloofs at the stake.

Sometimes new hires don't work out. Hiring people isn't a perfect science and the Maloofs have picked a stinker. What will make or break these guys as owners is how quickly they rectify this situation and how they handle the Petrie situation going forward.

We just got embarrassed by Atlanta, Muss has made the decision really easy.  
 

We are slipping into the NBA abyss.

by jjham15 @ Sactown Royalty on Mar 19, 2007 10:58 PM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
There is alot to chew on so ill try to answer appropiately. It's also well thought so the response will take awhile.

First item: I dont know if Muss got a raw deal in GS. He did have arenas & dampier on a final deal to coach. That is something to work with. Even if hibachi zero wasnt on the level he's currently at. I dont know how much working for mike fratello helped him or not. Fratello got canned for losing his players this season. Also ive never hired/fired anybody. But i know that running a nba team is not like running other business'. You dont do things the way you would run a beer distributorship, casino etc etc etc.

2nd item: I didnt say musselman deserves all the blame or even most of the blame. This isnt a team that takes advantage of what he does. I think the team would be best to part ways. It's clear he doesnt have an elixir to brad miller being permanently grounded. Again this comes back to the maloof's. Noone realistically expects muss to be able to coax athleticism or speed out of miller,bibby etc etc etc.

3rd item: He deserves to get fired for the way he's handled this team this season. Handling artest with kid gloves is not a smart way to go. He never drew a boundry. This team looks confused on the court & i think that is a byproduct of a mismatched group from the coaching staff to the group that is on the court.

4th item: Geoff Petrie does deserve some blame. Part of a good relationship between a coach & owners is on the management buffer between them. I'm pretty sure ,though, that Geoff can only take that buffer so far. Rick can be surly & difficult for sure and anyone will tell you that when they've tried to interview him. The problem is they really believe (naively from my view) that coaching makes a great difference in playing defense. Eh not with mike bibby on your team. Ive said for years including when this blog was newish that mike bibby was an awful defender. I still maintain he's 1 of the 5 worst. Anyway the problem that as I see it with the maloofs is they are trying to be a mark cuban'ish' owners. But as ive said many times they should settle for listening to their basketball people. They dont understand personnel like cuban does (they dont have his success or failure @ it...well maybe the failure...but not the success either...the kings greatest assest's belong to petrie)and frankly have a different set of circumstances. Cuban has a much bigger market and more money to spend too. He likes attending the games & so do the brothers. The comparisons end there.

5th Item: Artest is very different from most of the players you mentioned really. Mad max was a 1 year option. So was bonzi wells in my humble opinion. In fact 1 of these days im gonna do a bonzi vs johnny post. I think webber's problems were more locational than anything. Being a star in a place like sacramento balanced many of his quirks. Ron-Ron is not like any of these guys. He has personal problems that stem his ability to focus. I'm not sure comparing any of those guys to each other has much to be learned in a comparison.

Last but not least the lesson is that petrie is still the biggest asset this organization has. Not everybody likes every move he makes. But it says here that the maloofs would be wise to step back & listen to Geoff. I have had arguments with a few unwise kingsfans who swear up & down that geoff was hired in 1995. The reality isnt simply so but they go onto hoopshype and they see thats when, according to hoopshype, he was hired. It doesnt matter if thats the reality or not. I think thats what happened to the maloofs. They heard comments from hubie brown about jason williams playing defense because he demanded it. That mike bibby played defense because he demanded it. Well the reality is that demanding defense wont get it. Jason williams' defense didnt improve in memphis. He simply funneled guys into the shot blockers memphis had. That isnt better defense. Thats simply a different focus on how to play basketball. No one will ever confuse hubie brown for rick adelman or vice versa. Unfortunately, for the maloofs & us, they quite arent able to make these distinctions. I wish they could as they have the potential given their passion to create a truly top echelon franchise. That would be truly remarkable given over the course of time how few small franchises have been able to maintain an upper echelon status. They wont however achieve this if they are trying to compete with the cubans of the world for attention. They're Las Vegas guys who like glitz & glamour. They better learn the cow pasture just dont roll that way.

I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 19, 2007 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
I keep hearing that the Maloofs should step back and listen to Petrie. Is there any hard evidence to back up the fact that the Maloofs are calling all the shots on player personnel?

We continue to deify Petrie as if he can do no wrong. If this roster (and make no mistake, this roster is awful) and coaching staff is fully the result of the Maloofs meddling, then Petrie either has to make a better case to his ownership for his own ideas or he should have taken a walk prior to signing his last extension.

Every interview I've heard with Petrie indicates he is on board with the Maloofs. He is the GM, so he has to take some blame for what's going on here, as do the Maloofs, the coaching staff and the players.  Nobody gets a pass, IMO.

by otis29 on Mar 20, 2007 6:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
What hard evidence otis? Like the maloofs saying they fucked up? Hard evidence is bullshit. What i know is that this team frontline is neither great nor as bad as they are @ the moment. Maybe you dont like adelman otis. Fine its your opinion & ur entitled to it. But on the flip side of all this you have yet to give a quality argument as TO WHY the maloofs are good owners. I'd be interested to see that i really would.
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 20, 2007 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
Geez pookeyguru, we've been on that carousel before about the Maloofs. No need to go back there again. I've listed reasons the Maloofs are good owners, you just disagree. As you say "its your opinion & ur entitled to it."

So forget about hard evidence. How about any evidence other than whispered rumors in the Sac Bee? I'd like to know how anyone knows that the Maloofs have made these decisions without the support of Geoff Petrie.

by otis29 on Mar 20, 2007 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
You know otis you continue to say similar stuff too. Yet somehow i keep bringing the topic up even though someone else brought it up before me. Thinking a new arena will be a bad financial deal for the city is not necessarily the same thing as saying they're bad owners. I dont know what the bee has to do with it either. Since when does have an opinion matter to you as long as you dont agree with it otis? You want hard evidence in your terms. Well guess what the reality is that hard evidence exists you would already be saying it.

If the only challenge you have to me is that you dont like my opinion than dont comment otis. Since you clearly like to say my opinion has little fact behind it. I dont have a malacious feeling toward the maloofs. I am tired of the 'woe is me' act they keep putting on cuz they cant get a new arena. They're part of the blame so far not part of the solution. However thats not even part of why i think they're bad owners. I just think they dont quite get it. Spending money & caring about your team does not equate to making good basketball decisions.

I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 20, 2007 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
pookeyguru, all I'm trying to find out is why Petrie gets a pass here. It seems (and this is not necessarily directed to you, but to the general populace here) that everything good that happens (Adelman, Kevin Martin, etc.) is Petrie's doing, and everything bad that happens (Musselman, Artest, the Webber trade) is the fault of the Maloofs.

I have a damn hard time believing that - there is nobody in this franchise above blame for the crap we saw on the court last night.  It's a result of mistakes by the ownership, the GM, the coaching staff, and the players.

So yes, I will admit that the Maloofs have made some mistakes, but that doesn't make them bad owners. I'm not ready to throw that tag on them over one missed playoff appearance.

by otis29 on Mar 20, 2007 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
Otis i dont have a personal vendetta vs you or anyone else. I understand that you think im absolving petrie of blame. I'm not as i have said. Obviously you have missed those posts. But i have said @ best petrie is complicit in all of this. There is no doubt of that.

That statement 'shades of gray' really applys here i do think. How much involvement & blame does petrie get for some of this? Well as much as he deserves. If its clear how much blame he deserves well then i will say it. If i knew exactly what to blame petrie for well then id point the finger @ him.

Here's part of the problem. It's hard to tell owners that they're doing something wrong. For anybody and im sure Geoff is in that boat somewhat. The maloofs do own the kings & may not want to hear that the kings biggest issues to date revolve primarily around contract negotiations. I know miller has dropped off dramatically in production but thats my point. When hammering out that deal you might have to take that into consideration that a guy's career might get altered in the middle of it. I'm not sure the maloofs understand that. Otis look @ who the highest paid & lowest paid players are. If you had to guess which  did the negotiating (petrie the maloofs or both) id be curious to see what you thought.

Otis on a side note i would be curious to know who pulled that bonzi contract off the table. I want to know how that all went down. I have my theory & if you wish i will share it.

I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 20, 2007 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
That's the problem pookey, we don't know for sure who pulled the Bonzi contract, who really made the Artest or C-Webb trades, who nixed the Lakers trade for Bibby, or if it truly existed.

So until I know that, I'm taking Petrie and the Maloofs at their word that they are a unified group. And if they are a unified group, they both deserve credit for the successes and blame for the failures.

I understand that you and I differ on how much an ownership should be involved in the decision making process, and that is always going to color our thought process on who is to blame for the current state of the team. Since it's highly unlikely either of us will change our opinion on that topic, we should probably just agree to disagree and move on.

by otis29 on Mar 20, 2007 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
On the extent of the maloofs involvement we are going to agree to disagree.

On the C Webb trade i would like to find WHY somebody thinks that didnt help the kings. Receiving the poodle in return is not a good enough reason from where i stand.

The bonzi deal is totally a miffer otis & im with you on that. It's hard to figure out who's doing what. It protects petrie to a degree and it protects  the maloofs to a degree.

I'll be honest as to why i think the maloof's decision making is unsound. There's precedent for it. Sure petrie was involved in getting miller as he was a guy who fit that system. The circumstances changed & the team is stuck with the bill. But i also think part of the problem is miller's contract. I dont think he's moveable if he was making 8 mil a year. But it would be easier to move him down the line.

I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 20, 2007 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
The C-Webb deal has a major flaws.

We absorbed 3 contracts, one of which continues on at 8+ million for another 3 years. So although the Kings freed themselves of Webbers 23 million for next season we are still stuck with an additional 16 or 17 million over the next 2 years for a player who is worth maybe 2-3 million.

The second flaw is that even if you purged the Webber contract we are still at the cap so....the Maloofs saved money but we as fans are stuck with a shitball team that can only at a 5 million dollar exemption player unless our point guard opts out of his contract.

We were better served letting Webber play out his deal and at the end of next season we could watch all 23 million go off the books, freeing up the 8 million that we will be paying K. Thomas.  

The original plan was to break Webbers deal into more manageable and easier to trade pieces. But those pieces are still here (Potapinko=Skinner).

In conclusion............I would have liked to have seen the Kings with Webber, Artest, K-Mart and Bibby. We would probably still be a 45 win team with a whole lot of cap space on the horizon. Instead we are in pretty bad shape for the next few years.

We are slipping into the NBA abyss.

by jjham15 @ Sactown Royalty on Mar 21, 2007 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
I never said the deal didnt have flaws. I never said that the kings were clear cut winners. May i remind you that the kings UNLIKE PHILADELPHIA are not in a good position to waive somebody like webber.

Also i think you forget a couple things. This team could have won 45 games without webber had things broken their way right. If musselman worked out, if bibby didnt get hurt or artest didnt go wiggy. I think youre assuming things that cant necessarily be assumed. Also paying luxury tax for a 45 win team doesnt make much sense to me as a fan. It's a waste of money and makes the maloof's less willing to spend money when the time is right.

Last but not least this team is in the position it's in part because of the bad contracts to webber,bibby & miller. As good as chris could have been keeping him would have not been worth it. Also if you think Brad is unathletic what is Chris? I'm also not sure the kings could have gotten a better deal. At the time kenny thomas had the worse contract of the guys Sac received. Philly didnt want him and in truth the kings no longer wanted webber @ his salary. You may wish as a fan that money doesnt matter however when you have to pay it youre view might change. Paying luxury tax for a 45 win team with a group who once contended for a ring isnt necessarily wise to go with it still.

I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 21, 2007 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
"Also i think you forget a couple things. This team could have won 45 games without webber had things broken their way right. If musselman worked out, if bibby didnt get hurt or artest didnt go wiggy. I think youre assuming things that cant necessarily be assumed."

I don't know that you should be questioning my assumptions with your own assumptions. There are a considerable amount of could haves and ifs in your response.

The Maloofs have plenty of money to spend. They signed the contract, they promise a winner and they charge out the ass for tickets, parking and concessions.

For the money I donate to watch from the stands the last thing I want to hear is that not paying the luxury tax was more important than winning games.

Since these bastards (The Maloofs) signed the new TV deal they have tightened up the purse strings and produced a very questionable product.

We are slipping into the NBA abyss.

by jjham15 @ Sactown Royalty on Mar 21, 2007 11:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
You cant promise a winner. The maloofs arent perfect. They charge out the ass for tickets. Paying luxury tax is stupid for a 45 win team regardless of how much the tickets are being charged. A questionable product is in the eye of the beholder. Would the kings have made the playoffs with chris webber in 05? Was acquiring artest given his total history a smart move? All these things we may disagree on. I think artest was a short not a long term move. You probably disagree. I think trading webber made sense from a basketball/money perspective. The only reason i care about the team not paying luxury tax is that when it comes to the team making a decision where the team needs that extra player to make another run @ a championship...i would like to see the maloofs do that. As opposed to paying out the ass for a superstar who isnt 1.
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 22, 2007 2:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dailydime-070320

Hollinger mentions potapenko but not J-Will. I guess he remains only on kings fans radar. That will change. J-Will has the tools to make it in this league. My guess is that his attitude is commensurate.

I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 20, 2007 2:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
Well, my prediction sorry to say, came true.  1-4 for the road trip.  It seems everyone has finally came to the conclusion that this team sucks.  Now we're trying to figure out who's the goat.  My vote is for Petrie.  Did the Maloofs force the move to Musselman?  Maybe.  But that was not the problem.  You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.  Any one who thought the Kings were a playoff team with the front court they have was fooling themselves.  Now we hear rumblings of Petrie wanting to flee Sactown.  Sad.  Screw up the team and then run away?

by KingsFan on Mar 20, 2007 8:40 AM PDT reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
One more thing.  The Maloofs are not going to move the Kings to Vegas.  They just signed an extension of the naming rights for Arco and my contact in Vegas says that the casinos are not happy with the basketball crowd that the All Star game brought in.  The Kings are here to stay.

by KingsFan on Mar 20, 2007 8:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Game 67 - at Atlanta
Did vegas become a quality pro sports market recently?
I am the stone that the builder refused I am the visual, the inspiration That made Lady Sing the Blues..I'm the spark that makes your idea bright...

by pookeyguru on Mar 20, 2007 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Tyreke Evans, Selling Low, or Selling high?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration (UofL days)
Kings_sports_illustrated_small
Funny story
Small
As I sit here and watch the OKC Thunder come back against the Lakers
Waymantisdale-tz-150_small
the owners called down the thunder
Chief_petty_officer_small
Maturity in Sacramento Debacle
Small
Ryan Anderson to the Kings - Petrie's Gotta Give It A Thought
Chief_petty_officer_small
Open letter to the Maloofs
Small
Middle Ground on the Roster Situation
Chief_petty_officer_small
A Perspective on KHTK
Small
Terrence Ross Watch

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G