Artest to Minnesota?
It's a weak rumor at best -- an off-the-cuff mention in an Arlington Heights Daily Herald notes column. But hey, what the hell.
Dealing with Kevin McHale could be a nice shot in the arm for this franchise.
50 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
I'd be down for that
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
by Jeff Reguilon on Jun 25, 2007 9:10 AM PDT reply actions
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
by CrownUs93 on Jun 25, 2007 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
WOLVES RECEIVE:
Ron Artest
Brad Miller
#10 pick
KINGS RECEIVE:
Ricky Davis, Mark Madsen, Mark Blount
#7 pick in the draft
#41 pick in the draft
by bballblog on Jun 25, 2007 9:39 AM PDT reply actions
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
i would also love to have ricky davis for artest and move up three spots in the draft. then we could take a dropping brandan wright, a dropping mike conley jr., yi, or brewer. we could pretty much take whatever we want here, not what's left over at #10.
by diehardkingsfan5 on Jun 25, 2007 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Oh, the Wolves are hesitating? Wonder why??
LOL
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
We're trying to put together a puzzle here, piece by piece and if we get the great young player we really like it's worth it to carry Ricky Davis for the short term. In the meanwhile, the guy can score.
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
by DB on Jun 25, 2007 11:26 AM PDT reply actions
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
For the record
Ron Artest 2 with a player option on his last year
7.8 mil with a 8.45 mil option
Mark Blount has 3 years left 6.7, 7.3, 7.9 mil
Mark Madsen has 3 years left 2.4, 2.6, 2.8 mil
Ricky Davis has a year left 6.8 mil
http://www.hoopshype.com/salaries/sacramento.htm
http://www.hoopshype.com/salaries/minnesota.htm
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
by DB on Jun 25, 2007 11:36 AM PDT reply actions
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
The above trade would save $2 million in 2007-08, $1.3 million in 2008-09 if Artest declines his player option next summer, $9.7 million in 2008-09 if Artest accepts his player option next summer... and about $1.6 million in 2009-10.
The talent would seem to be an even shift in the long-run -- Miller and Blount appear to be terrible for good, Madsen is a bench-warmer, Davis is a jackass volume-shooter who shouldn't start under any circumstances, Artest is a problem.
Davis comes off the books next summer at worst. I think he's a highly tradeable guy midseason, depending on whether GMs are again shy this year. Artest will always have a more limited market; Davis is bad, but not violent bad. Just ballhog bad.
Madsen is tradeable at less than $3 million a year. And he's a good character guy. I've always wanted to punch him in the face, yes. But this is a business.
If you can peddle Madsen, you could make this deal show significant savings (approximately $4 million per year). Every bit helps, especially when the Kings sat within a million bucks of the luxury tax this year.
Add in the upgrade from #10 (the leftovers from Hawes-Noah-Yi-Wright-Green-Conley) to #7 (potentially Brandan Wright or Corey Wright, or else your pick of most of the Yi/Wright/Green/Noah/Conley group)... it's a winner to me.
(Unless you think Brad Miller will rebound in strong form. The numbers don't suggest that's a remote possibility, though.)
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
As far as Miller vs Blount the thing about Miller is he can score more. Since Garnett is such a great board man it would balance Miller's/Garnett's deficiencies some. Artest is also a low post player which is something both Miller and Garnett are not. Plus with Juwan Howard you can always go big/small depending on your preference. The only reason Minnesota does this is if they're desperate in a last ditch effort to make the Wolves attractive to KG. However they help themselves by moving Madsen too sooooooo.....
The reason I like it is that the Kings wouldn't feel obligated to anybody in this deal long term. Madsen and Blount would become asset's at the same time along with Kenny Thomas. The 7th pick is a tangible asset that teams looking to move up to pick whatever player they might think is there would give the Kings an opportunity to trade down and get extra picks and what not. It's a deal worth doing from every perspective from Sacramento's end. The question is would Minnesota take the risk?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
by DB on Jun 25, 2007 11:38 AM PDT reply actions
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Trade Artest to Minnesota for Trenton Hassell (6.7pts, 2.7 Ass., 3.1 reb) and the 7th pick. Then trade the 7th pick to the New York Knicks for David Lee on draft day unless Brandan Wright is still there. Then with the 10th pick in the draft take Julian Wright, Jeff Green or Al Horford to fill Artest's spot.
Starting lineup:
C-Miller
PF-Lee
SF-J. Wright
SG-Martin
PG-Bibby
In Lee and Wright we have very good rebounding and passing big men. Miller can stay on the outside on offense. Lee can set screens down low for Martin/Wright.
Ah, it's draft time - We can dream right?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
t doesn't really make sense to move up for any other player who would be there.
Noah is now projecting to be there, and if the Kings don't move up he'd likely be snagged by either Charlotte or the Bulls who draft just ahead of us.
If this deal goes down I'd lay odds that Noah gets the nod, and since I'm the guy who just wrote that it'd be worth moving up to the #5 slot to get him, I'd be stoked about that!
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
I know you're not all that into Yi or Noah, and we could get your guy Smith at #12, but personally I do think there's a significant difference in what you'd get with a Noah compared to a project like Smith, and I'd be inclined to jump at the chance to snag somebody with Joakim's skill set.
On the other hand I haven't really scoouted who would be there with those two late picks, although I do know that it's very rare for a player taken that late to make much of an impact, or even to still be on the team after two seasons.
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Last year, for example with the #6 pick you add Martell Webster to the roster and the #8 pick gets you Channing Frye. Not too shabby, right?
But down in the lower regions, or even past the top 10, it gets dodgy very quickly. The Knicks scored with David Lee at #30 and the Warriors nailed Monta Ellis at #40, but for every one of those promising players there are 7 or 8 guys named Travis Diener and Brandan Bass. The odds are against you.
2005: Same thing only an even smore dramatic dropoff. At the #6 slot you get Brandon Roy! At the #7 you get Randy Foye!
But down in Multiple Picks land... well, Daniel Gibson looks like a good prospect and he was picked at #41 overall, but he's surrounded left and right by stiffs who aren't even league now. Denham Brown, Joel Freeland, Kosta Perovic, you get the idea.
2004: The #7 pick fetches you Luol Deng!
Down in the lower-middle of the draft Petrie pulls a rabbit out of the hat by stealing Kevin Martin at #26, and Anderson Verajao is a legit player at #29.
But once you descend into the basement of Round 2 searching for a bargain, well, good luck, because it's pretty much row after row of Tim Pickett and Ricky Minard (remember him?) type's you'll be sorting through in the cutout bins.
Pete Carill is a genius, but he can only do so much, and he has a lot better chance of success working with a young player who has actual NBA-level skills.
In my opinion if you can get a likely stud like Michael Conley Jr, Brandan Wright or Joakim Noah at #7 you shout "Hallelujah!" because you just had a nice draft. Then yet the other poor slobs worry about which small handful of players in round two might actually pan out.
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
So there are a few guys down in that range you feel pretty good about, Pookey? Like I said, I haven't gathered a lot of info about that part of the draft.
Marc Gasol has the right last name, and I hear there's some interest in the potential of Kyrlenko Fesenko. Oh, and I heard somebody on ESPN radio yesterday say they kinda liked the upside of this kid Wilson Chandler... I dunno.
Anyway, there's a report that Garnett is about to be moved to the Lakers, which I assume would probably end the talk of a T-Wolves/Kings deal.
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Who cares about Bynum.
by bballblog on Jun 26, 2007 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
by jjham15 @ Sactown Royalty on Jun 25, 2007 4:08 PM PDT reply actions
Re: Artest to Minnesota?
Pookey = my name

by 
















