More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
Now that Isiah Thomas has landed Zach Randolph, filling the hole at small forward has become the talk of the town.
Rashard Lewis is off the table (if he was ever even on it) and Thomas has said he won't used his midlevel exception, which is how some team is going to pay Morris Peterson. (Toronto isn't taking salary back.)
So of course Queensbridge's Ron Artest's name is back in the rags.
From the Daily News:
And from the Post's Marc Berman:
Artest, whose fallen out of favor in Sacramento, makes sense. Small forward is the hole in the lineup, and Artest would make the Knicks a solid perimeter defensive team that would cover up their shot-blocking woes. [...] Thomas has 17 players on the roster - two above the max, so another trade is coming - even if it's lateral. The new players can't be dealt for 30 days.
Commenter cwebb offered up Artest for Dan Dickau, Fred Jones, and David Lee. It works under the cap rules.
Lee is a prize you can't pass up. One of the best rebounders in the league, an efficient scorer who doesn't take many non-layups. All that on a rookie contract. With Jones and Dickau being serviceable vets whose contracts are up this summer, it's a no-brainer... if Isiah complies.
And unless he is deeply in love with Lee, why wouldn't he? Zach Randolph is a great rebounder. Artest is the elite perimeter defender he thinks he needs. Combining those two with Eddy Curry -- that's a vicious offensive post team. Do it, Zeke.
If this deal actually hits the rumor mill but doesn't happen, you'd have to think it's Isiah's call, right? Petrie couldn't pass up Lee considering all the slop he's been offered.
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by rbiegler on Jul 3, 2007 7:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
"Thomas previously has looked into the availability of Ron Artest, who reportedly is being shopped by the Sacramento Kings. Artest, who has two years and $16.2 million left on his contract, would cost less to acquire, though he, too, would come with baggage.But Thomas has confidence in his own ability as a mentor."
by louismg on Jul 3, 2007 7:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
good kid, hardnosed player, athletic (won a mcdonald's dunk contest) and a great rebounder. Just what the doctor ordered.
Nate wouldn't be bad either. A poor man's Bobby Jackson and an upgrade over Ronnie if he signs elsewhere.
Both are energizer bunnies and would become instant fan favorites in Sacto. Just not sure if Petrie pulls the trigger in the Nate package.
by cwebb on Jul 3, 2007 8:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by henryclemente on Jul 3, 2007 8:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by misterbrister on Jul 3, 2007 8:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by jjham15 on Jul 3, 2007 9:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by pookeyguru on Jul 3, 2007 9:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by jjham15 on Jul 3, 2007 9:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by pookeyguru on Jul 3, 2007 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by pookeyguru on Jul 3, 2007 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by pookeyguru on Jul 3, 2007 9:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
nate would just be the cherry on the top of this trade. he is a poor-man's bobby jackson, with a lot of street cred. he can also leap out of the gym, kind of like the dunk-of-the-year man (ronnie price).
by diehardkingsfan5 on Jul 3, 2007 10:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by misterbrister on Jul 3, 2007 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
David Lee is making 990,600 this year. There wouldn't be among a better bargain in the NBA for the kind of production he gives. Nate Robinson isn't worth it because of his attitude and he's too much of a scoring first PG. I don't see how the Kings benefit in more by bringing in Nate than Dickau/Jones myself.
by pookeyguru on Jul 3, 2007 10:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
My final verdict is that you only deal with NY if they want to part with Lee, otherwise just let Artest play out his contract and get nothing for him. Not the best but not the worst. At least that way you do not have to take on any more bad contracts to get rid of him. Besides Artest makes the national media interested in the Kings. Not that most here at SR care about such things, but I am in Houston and League Pass is expensive and dammit I want my Kings on TV.
by Mityt on Jul 3, 2007 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by jjham15 on Jul 3, 2007 1:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by pookeyguru on Jul 3, 2007 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
I don't think you're getting Lee for Artest. Even Isiah (as moronic as he may be at times) isn't dealing Lee AND cap space for Tru Warier.
As a Knicks fan, Morris, Dickau, and Jones would be the most I'd give up (or possibly substitute Nate for Morris). Lee was our best player last year by FAR (as evidenced when the team went 3 - 18 when he got injured).
The only reason I could see Isiah moving Lee in a deal for Artest is that there are rumors that his leg still isn't healed and that the injury is far worse than previously expected. Just something to chew on...
PS - Hopefully "The Twinkie Towers" will NOT be an appropriate nickname for NY's new frontline.
by Twinkie Towers on Jul 3, 2007 2:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by misterbrister on Jul 3, 2007 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
As far as Lee he's the only guy of value on the Knicks that the Kings could possibly want for Artest. Otherwise why deal Ronnie? Last but not least you gotta make the numbers work and the Knicks don't have many cheap contracts. I doubt the Kings are willing to take Jared Jeffries back so the Knicks are SOL if they think they can deal crap to get Artest. Petrie won't deal unless he gets the value he wants back in return. I doubt that would be anything less than Dickau Jones and Lee.
by pookeyguru on Jul 3, 2007 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: More Artest-Knicks Rumblings
by jjham15 on Jul 3, 2007 9:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















