Sactown Royalty: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: On Bobby in the Box Score Bar-right-arrows



The Importance of Tall Dudes

Brad Miller is not a good defender. I think we all accept that as fact (if not as a fact of life). Over the last two years, he has become slow, he has lost all lift in his legs, and he frankly has little business even trying to guard the better bigs in the West. His rebounding has become inexcusable for a man his size. His lack of blocks, while not surprising, is a constant drag on the team's overall defensive efforts. You'd be pressed hard to find another point guard/center combination unable to passably guard a pick-and-roll -- Mike Bibby is too slow lazy ineffectual to get over the screen, and Miller could make the right decision every time and still not make a difference due to his lack of athleticism.

So we accept all of this. Then how do we square with the fact the team was much, much better on defense when Miller was in the game?

When Miller was on the court last season, the team's defensive efficiency was 106.4 -- which is roughly league average. When he was not on the floor? The team's defensive efficiency was 111.2, an extremely terrible mark. When Brad played, the team had 48.9% rebounding rate. It was worse when he was gone, 47.5%. The Kings also blocked more opponent shots when Miller was present (4%) versus when he was not (3%).

All this squares to give Miller the best on/off on the team. (Ron Artest shares the honors -- both had a net on/off of +7.4. Maurice Taylor's figure was higher, but he barely played.) On/off tells us about a player's impact on the game beyond scoring and rebounding... but it also includes noise regarding both the player's substitute and his competition. This noise is where our answer about Miller's quizzical import lays.

Miller played 44% of the team's minutes at center. Shareef Abdur-Rahim, of course, took over center duties during Miller's injuries, and logged 33% of the team's center minutes. Corliss Williamson (?!) logged 8%, and Justin Williams had 7%. Others divvied up the rest.

About two-thirds of Reef's minutes were at center. Overall, the team with Reef on the court had a defensive efficiency of... 110.7. Ouch. Without him, it was 107.3. Again: We know Miller is not a good defender. We suspect Reef is also not good, but not god-awful... as a power forward. Defending centers? He's god-awful. I repeat: The team's defensive efficiency with Miller on the court was 4 points per 100 possessions better than with Reef on the court. Kind-of astounding, isn't it?

(Note: Only 25% of Reef's total minutes came with Miller on the floor. The team was actually decent on defense in that time -- not great, but decent.)

So why does any of this matter? Because the team has height now. We know Miller sucks on defense, and we know his replacements last season were active but small players. (Reef is 6'9.) But the team played better defense with the tall, crappy guy than the short, OK guy. Enter a few new 'tall, OK guys' -- Mikki Moore and Spencer Hawes. Moore is said to be an active defender, certainly not a shotblocker of note or a deft rebounder. But he's 6'11 with long arms. Shawes likewise won't be great shakes at a defensive pivot. But he's big, Lord is he big. And I think he'd beat Brad in a footrace. Of course, Justin Williams is also present... something that wasn't the case during Miller's early season injury a year ago. Williams is not pleasant to watch working the screen-roll, but his ecstatic shotblocking makes up for it in spades (or at least clubs).

Signing up tall dudes isn't the answer, of course. But when the other option is to go super small (with these non-Ben Wallace players at least), height is the better option. With Miller back and legitimate center options in place, the team defense could actually improve and maybe slip into the top half of the league. (It was 22 out of 30 last year.) The team offense was 15th of 30 last season, perfectly average. We all fret 60 losses like a plague, trying to cure our cries with dreams of Derrick Rose. But playing for the ping pong balls doesn't work. Let this give us hope...

WE CAN BE A PERFECTLY AVERAGE TEAM THIS YEAR!

Go Kings.

0 recs | Comment 18 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
I'm having trouble telling whether that person in the blue scarf below is dude or a woman.  Can you give us an assist TZ.  It reminds me of a photo op of the Celtics/Jazz benches of the mid to late 80's.  Jerry Sichting check, Danny Angie check, Brad Lohaus check..
Damn you Robert Horry!!!

by chupacabra on Aug 27, 2007 3:21 PM PDT   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
Looks like Debbie Downer to me.

by Ziller on Aug 27, 2007 4:10 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
Is that the funny looking gal on SNL?

by Kusian on Aug 27, 2007 8:47 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
Yar. This one is a fair representation.

by Ziller on Aug 28, 2007 7:33 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
"Ladies and gentlemen, here are the winners of the 40 and over division in Everquest!"

by otis29 on Aug 27, 2007 4:17 PM PDT   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
The caption on the picture should read, "Guess which one is TZ?"

by R3DLiN3 on Aug 28, 2007 6:54 AM PDT   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
Oh damn! That was cold, brother.

This is actually a google-pilfered photo of a championship Canadian bowling team.

by Ziller on Aug 28, 2007 7:33 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
Yes, despite the American flags in the background.

by Ziller on Aug 28, 2007 7:34 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
TZ...you could be that Bob Saget looking dude 2nd from the right. Just kidding brosef!!!

by R3DLiN3 on Aug 28, 2007 7:45 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
I don't often rest my head on men shoulders, though.

by Ziller on Aug 28, 2007 9:16 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
I love how serious the dude on the far right is. Like he's Bobby Fischer or something.

by Ziller on Aug 28, 2007 9:17 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
I thought that they were the center piece winners from the Tannenbaum Bar/Bat-Mitzvah (check out the tollace on the little guy/girl).
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Aug 28, 2007 9:44 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
I think you're right, actually.

by Ziller on Aug 28, 2007 9:54 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
I miss Andre the Giant. Where are characters like him in entertaiment these days

by NYCFan on Aug 28, 2007 8:25 AM PDT   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
Princess Bride 2, starring Yao Ming.

Could there be a worse actor?

by moproblemz on Aug 28, 2007 11:06 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Re: The Importance of Tall Dudes
If Yao replaces Andre then Fabricio Oberto and Bob Weiss replace the other two guys.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Aug 28, 2007 11:21 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
When do we bury the hatchet?

Recent FanPosts

Img_0922_small
What’s the over/under on Reggie Theus being fired midseason?
Small
Add a favicon to the website please
Small
What's next for the Kings? Look at the past.
Thunderwolf_small
A Kings Fans' Constitution
Small
Kings vs US-team - Where you place the loyalty?
2007_01_mooninite2_small
Updated Salary thoughts
Small
Thoughts on Ricky Rubio...
Tokyo-map_small
Western Standings
Small
New Twist on an Old Idea

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Editor

Tom_toon_small Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Associate Editor

Ronnya_small rbiegler

ad

Site Meter