Being Shelden Williams
Continuing in my series of wasting dedicating a lot of time and space to potential fringe players, I proudly present my Shelden Williams novella.
Prior to the arrival of Donte’ Greene, Shelden Williams had the most frequently misspelled name on the Kings’ roster. It’s Shelden, with two “e’s.” That’s OK. To err is human, three err is Eugenio Velez. But I digress.
Shelden Williams was selected with the number five pick of the 2006 draft by the Atlanta Hawks. The Hawks have been lambasted for this pick, as they chose Williams ahead of guys like Brandon Roy and Rudy Gay. But the Hawks needed help at the four, and Williams had the same Duke pedigree bestowed upon Carlos Boozer and Elton Brand. Truth be told, the Kings would have had a tough time passing on Shelden Williams had they held the fifth pick that year.
Williams averaged about five and half points and rebounds and a half block in his rookie year, playing 81 games and about 18 minutes per. The Hawks changed management, and the new regime thought so little of Williams that they passed on the opportunity to draft Mike Conley in spite of having no real point guard on the roster at the time, choosing instead to draft Al Horford with the number three pick. The Hawks came back and chose Acie Law IV with the eleventh pick. Had Williams been able to establish himself with Hawks management, Atlanta could have chosen Conley and come back later and grabbed Thaddeus Young, Julian Wright or Al Thornton with the eleventh pick. Instead, Williams was part of the salary dump package that the Kings received in exchange for Mike Bibby.
Williams didn’t get major burn in either outpost last year, averaging under 12 minutes in 36 games for the Hawks, and under 13 minutes in 28 games for the Kings. For what it’s worth, Williams averaged four pts. and three rebs. for the season. Reggie Theus noted that Williams really wasn’t in game shape when he arrived here, but blamed most of that on the fact that Williams was not getting regular minutes in Atlanta. Ty Corbin might argue that theory, as the man made a career of being ready whenever called upon, but I suppose that’s what made Ty Corbin Ty Corbin.
Williams also carries a couple of other loads on his shoulders. First, he is engaged to Candace Parker. Now this is not a bad thing, unless you ask Chad Lowe what it was like to be Mrs. Hilary Swank. Reggie Miller had to deal with this early in his career as the brother of Cheryl Miller, but if you drill enough 3’s while Spike Lee is yapping in your ear, people have a tendency to cease and desist. Second, his name is Shelden. As Billy Crystal said in “When Harry Met Sally,” “If you need a root canal, Sheldon’s your man…but humpin’ and pumpin’ is not Sheldon’s strong suit.” If ever an NBA player needed to change his name, it’s Shelden. Tariq, Mustafa, Ocho Cinco, anything other than Nene would be an improvement. Again, I digress.
Shelden Williams is now entering his third season and is attempting to carve out a niche’ for himself in the NBA. On the surface, he would be a decent fit for the Kings. A banger on a team lacking bangers, a guy who seems to want to rebound on a team with no real rebounders. There should be a place for Shelden Wiliams and his NBA-sized buttocks on the Kings roster, as he is the one and only guy on this team that can eat space in the middle on the defensive end. And he will wear a Kings jersey this year, earning $3.4 million along the way.
The question is will the Kings extend him? They have exercised their option for next year on Spencer Hawes, but have yet to extend Williams or Quincy Douby. Williams would earn $4.3 million next year, which is right there with fellow bangers Ronny Turiaf ($4.1M), Reggie Evans ($5.0M) and Darius Songaila($4.5M). The Kings would have a lot of work in front of them to clear real cap space for next year. It would have to include dealing Brad Miller at the trade deadline for expiring or a draft day deal to a team with cap room. Figuring that K9(woof!) is untradeable, without a Miller trade the Kings could only get about $7-8 million under the cap if they bought out Moore and did not extend Williams and Douby. That is hardly enough room to do anything significant. So whether or not you extend Shelden Williams, it will little impact on what the Kings may ultimately do next year from a salary cap standpoint.
So, if you don’t extend Williams, would he fetch more than $4.3 million on the open market? Probably not. And given Candace’s ties to the states, he is probably less likely than most to take an overseas gig. But if you do pick up his option, you are not signing him to a 2-3 year deal, you’re merely committing one more year to him. And the Kings can use his talents. So the real question then becomes, will the Kings use him? Can Shareef Abdur-Rahim help him develop enough of an offensive game that he would not be a liability on the offensive end? Kid needs to become proficient at 15 feet, because he gets stuffed a lot underneath. Corliss Williamson developed a host of low post moves to help combat this over his career. Can Shelden Williams do the same?
I think that it is safe to say that most Kings fans would love to see Williams earn an extension. The idea of watching Hawes/Williams/Thompson all develop and become a talented and versatile front line for the Kings for years to come? Throw in Donte’ Greene if you’re feeling greedy, and think about Hawes at C/PF, Williams at C/PF, Thompson at PF/SF, and Greene at SF, depending on matchups (this is not a call to trade Brad Miller right now – this is just a look at life after Brad). The mind races with possibilities.
I say extend Shelden Williams if you intend on using him, and intend on using him if you extend him.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What first struck me
was the headline of your post “Being Sheldon Williams” over that Simpsons picture. My first thought was “oh no”. I thought the article was going to be about making fun of Sheldon’s looks. Glad it was not.
The problem is Mikki
He’s here and he will likely start and eat up 30 mins a game. Leaves enough for either JT or Shelden, but not enough for both.
Personally I’d be happy to extend Shelden and trade Mikki. Let JT start and play 20 mins. Give Shelden 20 mins and Have Spencer get the rest in addition to his minutes backing up Brad.
This might lead to a few less wins this year, but so what. Maybe Williams can be a part of the future, For sure Mikki is not.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
Disagree.
I think the problem here is Shelden’s offensive game. Or lack of one.
It’s like the Douby argument. If the guy were GOOD he’d be playing, here or someplace else. Blaming it on the guy ahead of him in the rotation doesn’t work.
If he were better than Mikki he’d play more than Mikki. If he were better than JT, he’d play more than JT.
Section is exactly right. Shelden needs to EARN his extension. I love to have a guy banging in the paint and crashing the boards on defense. He needs to learn to play some kind of positive role on the other end of the court to merit more playing time.
Let's go home.-Kevin Martin
by LeaguePassAddict on Oct 18, 2008 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree with what you are saying
and I think it is likely the reason Reggie will give Shelden very few minutes, but there is another factor. When a team is rebuilding there needs to be some consideration for the future. Is Mikki better than Shelden today? Yes. Will Mikki be better than Shelden in 3 years? No. If Shelden gets minutes today will he be better in 3 years than he would be if he gets no minutes today? It’s likely.
At some point a rebuilding team needs to sacrifice today to improve for tomorrow.
It’s not like the Douby argument because the players ahead of Douby are a part of the future, the players ahead of JT, Spencer and Shelden are not.
If your goal is to win as many games as possible this year with no consideration for next season, then you are absolutely correct(and it should be noted that this is Reggie’s goal). If your goal is to position your team to make a run for a championship as quickly as possible, I think your way of looking at it is counterproductive. This is where GP needs to step in and do what is best for the future of the franchise.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 18, 2008 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Not as easy as it appears
If Moore is the best guy at the posiion then you owe it to him and the team to play him. The better scenario would be for Moore to be somewhere else, freeing up minutes for Williams and Thompson. But while Moore is here and outplaying the youngsters (at least in the eyes of Theus, whose existence is predicated on winning games), Mikki plays, at least until the Kings are bounced from playoff contention (again, in Reggie’s eyes).
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
I never said different
In my first post:
extend Shelden and trade Mikki
In my second post:
and I think it is likely the reason Reggie will give Shelden very few minutes
And the solution from my second post:
This is where GP needs to step in and do what is best for the future of the franchise.
He could accomplish this by trading Mikki like I suggested in my first post.
I also noted in my second post:
If your goal is to win as many games as possible this year with no consideration for next season, then you are absolutely correct(and it should be noted that this is Reggie’s goal)
Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see where your post contradicts anything I posted.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 18, 2008 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions
Ehh
Moore doesn’t really have any trade value, though. He’s 33 and being paid about 5 mil per season, when he’d normally be on the bench on any other team. The only value I see in him is as an expiring contract. An expiring contract for an expiring contract doesn’t make much sense.. So, the Kings would need to trade for a player worth 5mil and over per season with some years still left on their contract.
Yep
This is the problem. Shelden is probably screwed.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 18, 2008 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Erm...
I was agreeing with you. If I were to find a point to disagree on, it would be in regards to GP stepping in. You hire a coach to win games (at least one that does not have a contract beyond this year). If you want Theus to move forward with the youth movement, you really need to extend his contract. Hmm, I agree with you again – GP would need to step in.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
So I was right!
I did miss something. ;p
I missed that you were agreeing with me. Sorry.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 18, 2008 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions
So, then, we all agree.
Mikki will play because he’s better than Shelden.
Shelden needs to get better to play, but probably won’t get better because he doesn’t play.
I disagree with Cloudy, though. I think Mikki will always have some trade value because Mikki is paid what a back-up PF gets paid and he’s always been a good team guy as a back-up PF.
The biggest problem we have is that we only have back-up PFs. We don’t have a starting PF on the roster at this point.
Let's go home.-Kevin Martin
by LeaguePassAddict on Oct 18, 2008 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
True That
The biggest problem we have is that we only have back-up PFs. We don’t have a starting PF on the roster at this point.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 18, 2008 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Jason Thompson excluded
I disagree with that. I refuse to rec based on the basis there isn’t a joke in there.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
Or i agree with LPA's statement
Jason Thompson excluded.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
Points
I think there’s no question Mikki is a better player than Shelden at this point … on offense. Mikki is far superior to Williams or Thompson on offense — he knows his role and executes it flawlessly.
But this team desperately needs help on the boards, and Williams is the best rebounder on the team. This team desperately needs help on defense, and Williams is the best interior defender on the team.
Does the starting unit need help on offense with Hawes or Miller starting with Martin, Salmons and Udrih? Maybe. But the need for rebounding and defense is greater.
The problem is the difficulty of measuring defense. We can look at Mikki’s points and unbelievable efficiency a lot easier than Shelden’s impact on the bottom line.
by Tom Ziller on Oct 19, 2008 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec
This team is in need of what Shelden brings on the defensive end.
Although, I often wonder if Shelden’s offense is as bad as it looks. Yes, he doesn’t finish around the basket very well, but he does find other ways to score (i.e FTs). Granted it’s not pretty, but for now, it works. And it could get better if given the chance. But will it he be given that chance?
Brilliant summation
I also think Shelden can take up that screen setting role that Pollard willingly did too.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
Shelden's offense better than it looks
Consider that Moore has scored 4 more pts then Williams, while Williams spent most of his time playing center or at scrub time and not with the starters
Williams is tied with Martin in most FTA and second to Martin in FTM
But offense is only half the game, and the half where the Kings need the least amount of help
Shelden & JT have more total Offensive Rebounds then the next 4 highest players combined and Mikki isn’t one of them
Spenser, JT, & Williams account for 56% of all the blocked shots
Mikkis’ numbers aren’t getting better over last year. And he, Jackson, and Brown are the only players not to record a BLOCKED shot
I’d rather see the Kings defense improve by playing the young guys , then watching them score 100+ pts and lose by 10 with Moore.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 18, 2008 5:45 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Shelden
Shelden is a good defender and rebounder. Something we’ve needed out of the PF spot.
Yes, his offense is a weakness. But isn’t SAR our big man’s coach? Everybody says that we have to develop the young guys. So help him out. His progress can only benefit and he’s not a lost cause. He wants to contribute to the team and he wants to be effective.
And it’s not like he’s been playing horrible either so far. He’s played relatively well in the preseason (discounting vs Clippers). So, Shelden can get better IF he’s given the minutes; which Reggie has said that he is trying to earn.
I say extend him. If he fails, then it’s only one year. But you have to wonder if Reggie and GP are looking at this guy in the same way? Do they see the potential in Shelden’s game or not? If they don’t, then he won’t be extended. With Mikki taking most of the minutes being a veteran and Reggie’s love for JT and his progress(he is the draft pick), Shelden doesn’t have the best chances here. His future here depends on the direction the team goes in. Apparently the team is “going for wins” and not the future just yet. That potentially leaves Shelden in the dust.
Sheldon could show the rookies something
like defense. It was a sad display in Dallas when the Mavs scored 124 points. Our rookies were pathetic on defense. This dunk by Gerald Green shows exactly what’s wrong as Donte, Brown and JT all watched Green fly through the paint without contest.
http://www.nba.com/video/channels/top_plays/2008/10/18/nba_20081018_dotn.nba/index.html?
Reggie keeps saying...
…that the young guys, including Shelden, have to earn their chance to play. I wonder why Shelden hasn’t “earned it” yet. Reggie said that Shelden had a very good training camp. And as much as I love JT, Shelden has been the best big off the bench behind Spencer so far even in limited minutes (even though I expect him to play more vs. Portland/Oden). He’s plays the best defense and he finds ways to score (even though it’s not pretty).
So unless Shelden’s bombing in practice, he should be getting more burn than he has been. Is his offense really THAT awful to where he can’t even get some good minutes in a preseason game to improve and have him help out in ways that we deperately need?
Sheldon's scoring
is of the garbage or put back variety. Not as flashy as JT’s but it’s good to see somebody doing it.
Its a real problem
That has been discussed well in every way I can think in the comments above.
What to do? What to do…..
My take is that I like what Mikki brings, energy – Desperately needed per my observations in pre-season.
But the future may be now, GP may need to face that if the team IS to move forward one of the veeran bigs must go.
BMiller is I think indispensible right now, if you want to win any games at all, his half-court distribution is essential. He can make the young bigs better, give them some easy chances, build thier confidence.
Does Mikki make the young bigs better? Probably yes – in attitude and enthusiasm – but not in game play.
I would take a hard swallow and trade Mikki (but I LIKE the guy!) to give the young bigs (Sheldon especially) an opportunity that they may not have earned – but need.
It brings me back to the question I vow to drive everyone crazy with until its answered though
Who Will Bring The Fire!?
Cisco? Cisco? CISCO!!!! #*$!%! !
by lietothegirls on Oct 20, 2008 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions
What Theus thinking?
I’ve been harping about getting more quality time for Shelden for over a month. I don’t know what Reggies’ waiting for. He’s only got 9 more days to decide whether or not to pick up Williams option for next year. Maybe the Kings have already decided But, either way there’s no reason I’ve seen not to play him a PF just a little. He’s done a good job at center for them, and everyone knows , none of the other PF’s have earned extended minutes.
And, what’s he doing benching Brown and playing BJax. Yea, Brown has had some turnover problems, but he’s a rookie and most were because he was trying too hard. He’s scoring better than Beno and Jackson and he’s faster and quicker and a better defender. Jackson doesn’t even what to play that much, and he shouldn’t because he’s got the worst shooting percentage on the team.
And, Thomas getting more time with the starters than Williams. What’s up with that?
Who’s going to play Backup Center with Miller out and will they continue to play a high post center offense?
Has the coaching staff got some kind of SECRET Plan all worked out , OR have they just plan lost it?
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
Free SheWill!
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by 

















