Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Completely Lost

Pride can't fully explain such a surprising turnaround. Yes, this is the Lakers. But Sacramento has hosted the Lakers for huge, momentum-shifting games during this rebuild without getting this. Remember the game Charles Barkley provided color analysis for? It wasn't a dissimilar situation, momentum-wise. And the Kings came out flat.

This time, flat is the furthest descriptor pertaining to the Kings' performance.

Pride's some of it -- pride in beating the Lakers and the player everyone seems to hate. Pride in snapping the home losing streak. Pride in snapping the losing streak. Pride in showing you're an NBA player and you deserve minutes. Pride in defense. Pride in hitting corner j's next to the Laker bench.

But there's something more there, and I'm completely lost in figuring it out. The only guess I can make is that the team smelled blood in the water and wanted desperately to help Reggie Theus save his job.

Even in Amick's game story today, he mentions how close Theus had been to being sacked. I mean, it was palpable. That Denver loss was absolutely abysmal. If Theus was already somewhere behind the 8-ball before that game (he was), it nearly sealed the deal. I know some of the players read the press, some don't. But you have to imagine they all knew Coach was in trouble.

This isn't to understate the pride Reggie himself showed Tuesday night. His rotations were great. He had a strong sense of the mistakes he would allow and those he would not. Garcia, Brown, Beno, Donté -- all saw a quick hook at some point, usually after an unfocused, sloppy play. Trying hard and not getting it done? That's alright -- but focus and try hard. Mikki wasn't exactly racking up blocks or rebounds, but he played his tail off after the Bynum spin move. Mikki fought and scratched and cla-- ahem. He fought.

Shock didn't get his shots to fall and had a couple turnovers ... but he rebounded a few balls that few players in the league could get. Shock and Hawes are both good rebounders, but here's the difference: Hawes establishes good position and gets every rebound he is supposed to. Shock flies all around the halfcourt and grabs balls he has no business touching. That's why he is a great offensive rebounder -- he finds open space and chases. And that effort saved some Kings bacon in this game.

If Salmons weren't a teetotaler, he would've earned himself a comped night at the Hardwood Suite for his battle with Kobe. Kobe hit one more FG than Johnny ... while taking 12 more shots. And a bunch of the makes came when the game had been more-or-less decided. Salmons also had more assists, more rebounds, fewer turnovers, and more steals ... and his +/- (+11) was better than Kobe's (-15) by ... 26 points. And this came as each guarded each other most of the night, with some help on each end.

I could go on and on and on and on and on ... and I probably will later today. Suffice it to say this is the biggest win since Game 3, 2006 first round, eclipsing last year's home win over Dallas. Instead of weighing the relative merits of Chuck Person and Kenny Natt, Ricky Rubio and Blake Griffin, I'm glad we're basking in the afterglow of a win over the Lakers. We've got two days before our hearts are on the line again, so let's enjoy it.

Comment 42 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

48 minutes

That was a good-looking team out there last night against the Lakers, as you said. Good efforts all around, and Theus looking very smart in his moves.

But can this team beat the Lakers on Friday?

I suppose that’s the rebuild in a nutshell, just never knowing what to expect. We could get destroyed by 25, or take another one from a very good Lakers team. The Kings actually do match up quite well with LA, and when Salmons manages to annoy Kobe into having an off night, it gives your team the chance it needs. I recall games where Ron Artest, and any number of great defenders, were living inside the front of Bryant’s jersey, and he’d still go for 35. Some nights, there’s not a damned thing you can do to stop the guy, but Salmons gets full credit last night.

If you could bottle the Kings’ effort and play from yesterday, you’d be rich. Of course, those guys are already rich, but I think I’ve made my cliche’.

Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen.

by andy sims on Dec 10, 2008 5:48 AM PST reply actions  

I generally buzz your stories

But this is one that’s nearly perfect, one of your very best pieces TZ. I didn’t get a chance to watch the game (stuck in SFO—thank you Alaska Airlines—then on 2 buses to get home) and it’s unfortunate that I did. I had a chance to watch the Denver game on the TV, and it was so nauseating I turned it off.

If this team gives this kind of effort the rest of the year, Reggiei is going to have to be thought of as a future coach. Because, clearly, this team still has it’s back. This is generally an open point, but at some point, we have to give Reggie some slack for the issue’s surrounding this team. It has one all-star, and he’s played 7 games, 3 of which were total blowouts themselves. This is not been a complete, healthy, or lucky team. Maybe this orbits the team into something else for awhile. That would be a welcome change for all concerned.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2008 6:02 AM PST reply actions  

This
This isn’t to understate the pride Reggie himself showed Tuesday night. His rotations were great.

Agreed, this was very impressive.

It may get lost in the shuffle of the team’s impressive effort, but Reggie showed his potential last night. If he adds some consistency, he can still show he’s the right guy long-term.

As an aside, you can see why there are so many man-crushes around here towards Cisco. He played inspired ball last night, mixed it up with Gasol and Bryant at various points, and hit some big shots. The guy isn’t going to get you 20 every night, but he might be the on-court leader (along with Spencer eventually) that this club needs.

"Don't sweat the petty stuff and don't pet the sweaty stuff." - My Dad, confusing me at a very young age.

by otis29 on Dec 10, 2008 6:02 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

My thoughts exactly

(Well, except the whole man-crush thing.)

But the tight rotation, the matching up, all very good.

Great effort on the boards, great hustle by the youngsters, excellent passing/ball movement/execution of set plays.

And I LOVE that Cisco got under Kobe’s skin, and Gasol’s, but was smiling about it.

I hate that Kobe doesn’t get t’ed up for what anybody else in the league would, but I thoroughly enjoyed watching Hawes knock him on his butt, watching him get called for a travel on a dunk move, and watching him dribble out of bounds on a baseline move.

Truly, I don’t think I’ve ever enjoyed watching Kobe more than I did last night.

Let's go home.-Kevin Martin

by LeaguePassAddict on Dec 10, 2008 7:09 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Cisco

Is the fire this team needs.

That WILL to Win, that determination to Make the Play that the team needs. Yes, its Cisco, and sometimes it goes wrong and looks terrible – but he is always determined to WIN.

He is not the most talented athlete on the roster, but he’s the best competitor by a touchdown or so.

They may need another player as well who has that same stuff to eventually contend for a Championship, probably a starter, maaaaybe Hawes can be the other piece, I certainly liked his reaction to throwing down Kobe,
steely satisfaction.

and yes, I admit to a man-crush on Cisco.

Cisco? Cisco? CISCO!!!! #*$!%! !

by lietothegirls on Dec 10, 2008 9:55 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

+1

Shut up and Coach

by Carl on Dec 10, 2008 10:03 AM PST up reply actions  

That monkey is even more frightening without the finger Carl

Like you. :)

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2008 12:51 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Hawes is absolutely that other guy

"Don't sweat the petty stuff and don't pet the sweaty stuff." - My Dad, confusing me at a very young age.

by otis29 on Dec 10, 2008 10:06 AM PST up reply actions  

I think they will get this team going

I don’t know if it’s important that they’re “leaders” in any real sense.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2008 12:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Even Kobe

gave Cisco his Daps at the end of the game last night. You can see it if you watch the goodbyes after the game.

The other thing that Cisco brings reveals itself in free throws. He gets to the line a little better than anyone else on this roster, besides Martin. And as much as we hope Salmons would/will do this, it’s almost like he needs to see someone else go first and then he becomes a little more aggressive in traffic, going for the +1.

Swagger, oh how we missed you.

If yr not happy with the results, lower yr expectations.

by tokyo on Dec 10, 2008 11:56 AM PST up reply actions  

As an aside, you can see why there are so many man-crushes around here towards Cisco. He played inspired ball last night, mixed it up with Gasol and Bryant at various points, and hit some big shots. The guy isn’t going to get you 20 every night, but he might be the on-court leader (along with Spencer eventually) that this club needs.

Exactly. Not take anything away from Kevin, but he doesn’t play with the same intensity Cisco does. Kevin is generally more consistent, but I’m not sure the outcome would have been the same without Cisco’s contributions.

Shut up and Coach

by Carl on Dec 10, 2008 10:02 AM PST up reply actions  

The Lakers tried to coast

and most nights that would have been enough. But not last night.

It was a meaningful game, and Reggie coached like it. He used just the right mix of veterans and rookies at the right time. When Kobe came back in, so did Salmons. When the rooks got a little shaky, in came Miller.

Probably better was him putting in Spencer for Moore late in game after Moore had actually done something right. Spencer was super cool in the end, and his kickout to Salmons helped seal the deal. We’ve definitely turned the page there.

Copy the formula, and repeat, repeat, repeat.

by coolcatreportdotcom on Dec 10, 2008 7:51 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

COAST?

They just got beat dude, pretty much the whole game except for a minute or two here and there.

Reach down, feel that heat and Man-UP! A little too ‘cool’ there.

Cisco? Cisco? CISCO!!!! #*$!%! !

by lietothegirls on Dec 10, 2008 9:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Apples and Oranges

The lakers just got beat… as indicated by that 3 in their Loss column. WHY they got beat is another question. Coasting is not a bad explanation. Plenty of other explanations though.

The Kings matching up well, the Lakers playing flat and uninspired, Kobe taking the game a too personally, the Lakers not running the triangle offense effectively. Poor defense. Lots of possible reasons.

On average the Kings won’t beat the Lakers over several games. Not even close. The Lakers have far too much talent to lose to us. I think the WHY explanation lies in WHY the Lakers lost, not in WHY the Kings won. Certainly doesn’t hurt that the Kings played inspired basketball though.

AK47, SN13, B52, and K9. One guns, Another runs, He fits, while it licks.

by CAB on Dec 10, 2008 11:18 AM PST up reply actions  

True answers come from affirmative arguments

not negative ones.

Cisco? Cisco? CISCO!!!! #*$!%! !

by lietothegirls on Dec 10, 2008 12:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks for the preaching, but I got out of choir a long time ago.

last time I checked, an answer was an answer, if it wasn’t true, it wouldn’t be an answer.

I looked over Coolcats explanation, and found it worthy of consideration.

I looked over your contrarian perspective and found an observation about the result of the game. The kings won. The Lakers got beat. Thank you.

I found coolcat to be a bit more insightful.

AK47, SN13, B52, and K9. One guns, Another runs, He fits, while it licks.

by CAB on Dec 10, 2008 1:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I just don't know why some on a fan site

can’t just be FANS for a few minutes after a good win.

Cisco? Cisco? CISCO!!!! #*$!%! !

by lietothegirls on Dec 10, 2008 4:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Because some of us experience fandom differently

You talk about flexibility, and you today you aren’t really showing any.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2008 5:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

NOTE: this is in response to LttG, but follows up on Pookey’s comment.

Not so long ago, LttG, you weren’t happy because the team wasn’t winning. Tell me what, specifically, has changed after beating the Lakers?

Don’t get me wrong, beating the Lakers is HUGE because they’re at the top of the Conference, but so was beating the Hornets, and that wasn’t good enough a couple of games later (that win has been talked WAY down lately).

For me, my view of this team is more along the lines of the long term, and the things that I am more focused on are player development and team chemistry. There was some of that in the Lakers game, which in the big picture will be at least as important as the “W” itself.

This is NOT the season to live and die by each game . . . make sure to keep some perspective.

by smgmatt on Dec 10, 2008 8:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Precisely

So we should just jump around and cheer for the next few days and not critique anything regarding the game? Get real.

In no way does our explanation for a team’s win or loss change the fact that we are fans, and fans of the Kings. Some of us even like to take a realistic approach to analyzing the events, circumstances and drama that culminated in a win-loss for the game. Some of us take pleasure analyzing these fanciful factors because we as fans, are blessed with this ability to derive pleasure from discussing any related to the Kings. The Lakers losing included.

I am a vindictive bastard. I take almost as much pleasure in the Laker’s loss as I do the King’s win. Almost. I’m sorry I’ve embraced both positive and negative occurrences to please myself.

AK47, SN13, B52, and K9. One guns, Another runs, He fits, while it licks.

by CAB on Dec 10, 2008 8:30 PM PST up reply actions  

The most interesting thing for me

was the offense mandate to bring the ball to the basket. The Kings were not a jump shooting team last night. The two guys that drive the ball the most – Salmons and Beno – did just that. Spencer went inside a lot not looking for 3 pointers. Cisco shot armed a few 3 pointers towards the end, but the tone on offense was aggressive. Defensively, I saw a lot of help coverage which has been sorely missed.

by betweentheeyes on Dec 10, 2008 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

The early threat - and success

of Cisco and others on the ‘catch and shoot’, opened up the offense middle for the slashers.

I couldn’t agree more on the help D – though we still left Rad open a few times to help and he punished us with 3s for it. Hell, that’s all that guy does – don’t leave him!

Cisco? Cisco? CISCO!!!! #*$!%! !

by lietothegirls on Dec 10, 2008 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

agree

Spencer was calling for the ball in the post over and over. I was thrilled – my only concern was that he kept being ignored. Encourage the big man when he’s willing to take it inside!

Overall there was an energy level and focus/attention to detail that is not always there. I don’t blame Reggie. I think a team either has a critical mass of guys like Cisco who have a greedy need to win/conquer/dominate or it doesn’t. And if it doesn’t, then it needs help gearing up – help in the form of a big home crowd or a hated rival or a healthy string of confidence-boosting good fortune.

And when you are the kind of team that needs things just right to perform at your peak…and you’re not good enough to get on many confidence-building rolls…then it’s a long season of TZ point-differential graphics.

Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.

by Holmdel on Dec 10, 2008 4:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Absolutely agreed about Spencer

He’s got ice in his veins and he has the potential to put the team on his back at the end of games. Glad to see Theus starting to recognize that.

by hozr on Dec 10, 2008 12:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Attitude

I just hope there’s more games like that coming soon, that we see THAT team, THAT style and determination often from now on. Too often the last few years we’ve seen them rise up against a good team – then fall back asleep.

My wife, not as passionate a fan as I – but a big fan who loves to go to games – wouldn’t watch the game.

We were at that NJ game and she’s very discouraged right now, she was sooooo hurt and dissappointed by that choke.

They’ll have to win some more games – or lose them playing that hard – to win her confidence back, so she’ll allow herself to risk some emotional currency.

STAY AWAKE guys, its a lot more FUN to play like that than the ‘cool’ professionalism some of our vets tend to fall into. I’ve got news for you, THAT performance was the ultimate show of professionalism.

Cisco? Cisco? CISCO!!!! #*$!%! !

by lietothegirls on Dec 10, 2008 10:20 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

as the Big Tuna says, "you are what you are"

And seeing Cisco last night and realizing what I don’t see from KMart, I’m reminded that we should not make the same mistake Seattle made with Ray-Ray. He was never going to become the type of leader they needed. He was wired to be a cold-blooded efficient purist. But an introvert. The would have been better off realizing that and going out to find the extroverted killer they needed to pair with him.

We need to realize that KMart is who he is. Let’s appreciate all he brings, not expect him to fundamentally change, and envision a line-up in which he can play his role as introverted cold-blooded efficient pure scorer. It’s an important role.

But if we think he can be something he’s not, we’re setting the team up for failure.

Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.

by Holmdel on Dec 10, 2008 1:20 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

It's why I like Kmart so much

Cuz I hate people so much so.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2008 2:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I also agree

and have said there’s personality missing post-Artest. The team must add some more emotional leadership – or someone like Hawes must provide it.

I think they need to add it myself

Cisco? Cisco? CISCO!!!! #*$!%! !

by lietothegirls on Dec 10, 2008 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

That was a great win.

Moral victories suck, but they feel good during a bad season. This feels like more than just a moral victory.

Here’s to hoping the team plays out of its mind for awhile and makes a good run.

Koponen - PG of the future. For Italy, that is. Book it.

by Blazerholic on Dec 10, 2008 1:20 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Well said holic

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2008 2:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I just want to thank the Kings

I wanted to kill after Hedo beat my Blazers with a BANKED three ball last night, and then I saw your score. And I went to sleep thinking, Its almost a wash.

Punk them next time at Staples to make me really happy!

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Dec 10, 2008 5:27 PM PST reply actions  

At least you can say the Blazers lost on luck

The Lakers don’t have that excuse, and any honest Lakers fan (like the one’s at Forum Blue & Gold) already knows it.

Also, when you’re 17-2, losing one game in the grand scheme of things means little, no matter how much fans of other teams revel in your losses.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2008 5:34 PM PST up reply actions  

No the Blazers just lost

the last shot was incidental.

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Dec 11, 2008 1:06 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Rec'd

For Brutal Honesty.

Not many would take the position you just gave (myself included). It’s far too easy to blame the last-second play in sports, when almost any other play during a game could have changed the outcome.

by smgmatt on Dec 11, 2008 6:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Fair Enough

And rec’d for honesty as well.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on

by pookeyguru on Dec 11, 2008 10:12 PM PST up reply actions  

The Blazers

have two or three wins that way so far this year.

last night we did it the hard way….

Cisco? Cisco? CISCO!!!! #*$!%! !

by lietothegirls on Dec 10, 2008 6:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow!

Where did you dig up that old ass photo? Or were the Celtics letting poor Jer’ hold onto it for a minute?

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Dec 12, 2008 4:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Webber_in_tuxedo_small
A Story Within the Enemy Camp
Webber_in_tuxedo_small
Blackout Contest: 15 Houses, One Team
Stock-illustration-177633-hand-holding-lightning-bolt_small
Lookin' UP!
Purpled_small
The Official #TNTNight Chant and Sign Extravaganza Thread

Recent FanPosts

Demarcus-cousins-cho_small
A Micromoment in Time
S113399682030553_3084_small
Fan from a Far
Demarcus-cousins-kentucky-university-gestures-after-being-selected-the-sacramento-kings-the-fifth-overall-pick-the-2010-nba-draft-new-york_small
Just rewatched the game on TNT after being there....
Small
This will not make Webber apologists happy
Small
TNT Telecast, ESC facts, and ... Peaches
Keon_clark_small
Do We Need a Pass-First PG?
Wallpaper-slamson_small
Sacramento Kings & National TV Audience
Small
My Appeal to City Council
Screen_shot_2010-05-23_at_10
Sacramento Kings Fans Stuck in So Cal? Watch the game tonight at 33 Degrees and win free dinner and drinks!
Small
My email to Councilwoman Pannell

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G