Winter Wonderlands
One of the unique qualities of an individual NBA game is its ability to function as a finger nail universe. When a team plays 80 some odd times over the course of the season there tend to be two trains of analysis when breaking said season down, either you look at accomplishments in their entirety (record overall, record against above .500 teams, record against sub .500 teams, record on the road) or, inversely, you break individual, situational statistics into sub-atomic particles and reconstruct those in the hopes of creating some more intimate, informative picture of the whole. Very rarely, in either of those forms of criticism, does a Tuesday night game in December strongly factor in. This is only logical for a season that stretches into the summer. But to due so may ignore the galaxy flourishing, or floundering, in our keratin. In May when asked, no matter how the season shakes out, who Sacramento’s best player is, my answer, the logical answer, will be Kevin Martin. But the honest answer, the one from that December Tuesday, will be Spencer Hawes.
At some point in his career Spencer Hawes will be the sort of statistical anomaly that garners you first or second pick fantasy draft status and Team USA first or second team invitations. Realistically this could be said for any 7 footer capable of delivering more than 5 assists intentionally. But with Hawes what’s revelatory isn’t the content of his eclectic statistics but the context with which those statistics are attained. Tonight Hawes was a funnel for this team, the game ran through him - when it ran through him - fluidly and fluently. The no look passes, the defensive rebounding, the 3 point shooting (which was not in action tonight) are all intriguing parts but the Hawes whole seems to be greater than those parts’ sum. This can’t be said for any other player on the current Kings roster. Martin is a great player, Sacramento’s best player. But he’s still a better player objectively than he is subjectively. Hawes is the inverse. And it is on those players that Petrie built his previous foundation.
Is this overstatement and overconfidence? Perhaps. But remember where we were with Hawes a little over a year ago. The 10th pick in a draft considered 9 All Stars deep. The alka seltzer to our Joakim Noah hang-over. 18 months later he defies any accurate analogy. He’s Brad Miller, sure, but Brad Miller was never able to find a synergy between his rough and tumble Pacer days and the high post Princeton Kings. Hawes has. He’s LaMarcus Aldridge if Aldridge could pass like Divac. He’s Christian Laettner if Laettner had slept with Tim Duncan. He’s Andrew Bogut without having to use your first over all pick. Is some of the above tongue in cheek? Clearly. But what’s wrong with inspiring hyperbole in the early goings of a make or break Sophomore season?
Tonight was not pleasant, and the good thing about the NBA is that a loss on a Tuesday in December does not a season make or break, and consequently it is quickly forgettable. But occasionally actions of the seemingly slightest significance mean much more than we realize. And for those actions it is the reaction that reverberates.
So we wait.
(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
3 recs |
8 comments
Comments
Well put
Well Argued, well said, and well thought out. Also well quaffed, but whatever.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2008 10:31 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This may sound cliché but it really isn't..
Hawes shows me something new every night.
smell the ashes
by iamstern'skippah! on Dec 2, 2008 10:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The season has peaks and valleys as do the players
throughout the season and the game. Beno started this last game v. the Jazz with a turnover and then had assists and was a good defender (or Deron Williams was just trying to make the game interesting for later). He faded in and out during the game, like a loose light bulb (but the effort was there). Brad Miller looked great on offense for 3 quarters. Defensively he had a pretty stat sheet which overshadowed his ugly flat footed man to man. In fact, each of the main Kings had highlights and lowlights except for two players: Spencer was a joy in every facet and poor Quincy was the opposite – poor poor Quincy might as well coat his shorts with lemon fresh Pledge because that guy will be having some serious pine time and he might as well do something useful.
I think Spencer has some Bill “Mountain Man” Walton in his game more than Brad Miller.
by betweentheeyes on Dec 3, 2008 2:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
And perhaps 10 years from now -
People will be calling a young prospect “a poor man’s Spencer Hawes.”
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Dec 3, 2008 7:53 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm extremely impressed by Spencer's play
They laughed when I drafted him in the 11th-12th round of all my leagues. Who’s laughing now, punks?
Anyway, very solid game from Spencer. My only criticism last night is that he caught the ball a little far from the basket to bust the hook shot like he did, and he needs to work on passing out of the double team down low. However this is predicated on players actually being able to hit threes when Spence is doubled. Cisco and Martin obviously help there. He really does have a multifaceted, versatile game that should only improve with time. Kudos to Petrie for this pick. Where’s Noah right now BTW? On the bench. Behind Aaron Gray and Drew Gooden.
by discocricket on Dec 3, 2008 7:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Spencer Highlights
Anyone got links to video of these no look passes and behind the back plays I’ve been reading about? I missed the game and would love to see some Hawes highlights.
by Mikey G on Dec 3, 2008 1:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















