A divisive subject at StR
Anyone that reads Sactown Royatly on a semi-often basis has surely noticed a recent split among the commons; basically the "pro" and "anti" Artest camps.
I will begin my diary with the following discalimer. I truly believe we all want nothing but whats best for the Kings; whether it be short term or long term, we all want to see our team succeed.
That being said, there is a clear line in the sand. Those that like Ron and all the talents he brings to the table, and those that belive his minuses outwy his plusses. Anyone that belive he has no talent or no flaws are simply going to be ignored here. Welcome to the real world of blogging (wow, next I'll defend Wikipediea's accuracy).
Ron Artest can f*cking play. Period. And he plays both ways. And he plays hard. If you dont like that, you dont like Kings basketball. However, Ron loves Ron. In his own mind he should go for 40 and 15 every night. Here's the thing, I think he could too. However, for him to get that kind of production, he has to look for himself first, second and third. The rest of the team would truly become a second thought.
On the flip side, this team is weak defensively without him. You cant argue with that fact, you just cant. Look at his +/- numbers. While his help defense isnt stellar, his one-on-one defense is. His intensity and tenacity bring a lot to the floor every night.
Since the "we should/shouldnt have traded him at the deadline" argument has been beaten to death, I wont go there. Also, no matter what the most recent quote or interview says, we have no way of knowing if Artest will be with the team next year.
All of this being said, lets get past the personal bickering around him. It's sad that on a site built to bring Kings fans together, we have resorted to attacking eachother personally based on our opinion of one individual player. I am not saying we should not debate his, or any other players, place in our future. Butlets not make our opinions on him a subject of hatred. Its sad to see the sixth post of an open game thread attack the opinions of others (that hadnt said a thing) instead of discusing the game in any way.
We are all Kings fan first, right? Plus, our next game is against the Lakers, so lets start to band together.

(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
0 recs |
34 comments
Comments
Good post, 27
by thekangarooster on Mar 2, 2008 11:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ok, I'll bite.
Yes, I agree that Ron is a very talented player. Defensively, he is one of the top man on defenders in the league. Offensively, he is a very talented isolation player, often even unstoppable when going to the basket.
Here are my grievances: Ron is not a good team defender. He often gets lost in coverage, he doesn't block shots as a help defender and he is vulnerable against taller small forwards. Ron often leaves his man behind the three point line to gamble on steals, his man often responds by hitting a wide open three. Ron is not a good rebounder, defensively, offensively, at all. It doesn't really make any sense, Ron is a beast around the hoop, he is built like a linebacker and he should be able to box out anyone in the league.
Ron is not a good team offensive player. Ron is good at passing out of the double team...if he really has too. Most of his assists come in these situations. Ron does not make the other players on the team better offensively. Ron doesn't hit Martin in the motion offense, leaving Martin to run around like a crazy man for no reason. Ron take too many threes and fall away jumpers. I don't care if his shots go in, if it is a bad shot, it is a bad shots (disclaimer: I didn't like Bobby Jackson for the same reason).
If Ron Artest played in the Eastern Conference I'm sure all of these negative attributes would be fine. The Western Conference requires an up-tempo, pass oriented system. Ron doesn't have the skill sets to be productive in this type of system long term. Sure, he has moments, even games where he looks spectacular in a motion offense but he is not consistent enough.
All of this being said, I can't get past the "other stuff". I pride myself at being a family man and a family man doesn't have domestic abuse issues, period. A family man doesn't get suspended without pay for 73 games because a family man has responsibilities regardless of how much he gets paid. I don't like players who can't co-exist with their coach, the coach is the man regardless of how big of a dip shit he is or isn't until he gets fired. A player has never led a successful mutiny and taken over a team as coach, so why try.
I am basing all of these statements off of my own opinion as a fan. My opinion might not be in the majority and I welcome constructive criticism or countering views. I like posting here on StR but I agree that things have become pretty out of control.
by jjham15 on Mar 3, 2008 12:03 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Well Said JJ
Now onto the minor nitpicking points (and this is in no way a criticism of the larger overall piece):
- Players have led mutiny's--it just hasn't been for them to coach
- Michael Jordan and Magic Johnson both got coaches fired early in their careers
- That's all I got
All I've seen from the pro-Artest camp is a bunch of flame thread starting and bullshit. I haven't seen a quality rebuttal to how Artest makes the team better. I haven't seen how Artest's abilities makes the team better. I would like to see that opinion, and yet despite many subtle, and not so subtle attempts, I haven't seen any rebuttal against the non-Artest crowd.
You're still on the clock folks. Step up to the plate, or stop complaining incessantly for little reason.
by pookeyguru on Mar 3, 2008 2:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Like the old Bud Light commercial,
It's like this: Artest is one of the most physically gifted players in the NBA, and he can do stuff on a basketball court very few others can. He's also a very intense player who is driven to win. When he's playing smart and he's focused he definitely helps his team do just that.
But obviously that's not the bottom line with the guy, because of two major hang-ups.
1) He has lapses where he tries to take over a game on his own, firing again and again from 20 feet out, not finding the open man, and basically clogging up the offensive flow. Now, C-Webb also had this tendency late in his career here, and I could almost live with a few instances of this flaw in Ron Ron's game, except for...
B) The man has a history of weirding out, and if he does it again while wearing a purple and black uni we are screwed, plain and simple. He's one incident away from suspension or maybe even being banned permanently from the NBA. It's just too big of a risk to keep him, especially on a rebuilding team that won't be a serious contender for at least another couple of seasons.
I didn't think Petrie should deal Artest at all costs, and get next to nothing in return outside of an expiring contract or two and a mediocre draft pick. But I do agree with Pookey and the others who argue that Artest shouldn't have a long-term future in Sacramento.
I think Petrie feels much the same way. He tried to trade Ron Ron, and I think he may yet find a way to move the guy to a contending, veteran team (where he could put his considerable talents to better use) and get something of value in return.
by Mucho Moss on Mar 3, 2008 2:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with all you've said,
I have always said that with all the criticisms leveled against him, that the bottom line is that he wants to win (he says that all the time), and if you put him in the right system (strong coaches, allow him to be who he is, and put alot of responsibility on him) he will flourish.
I still think this team can be that for him.
by shazam on Mar 3, 2008 10:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
BEAT LA im all for it !!!!
by maiku on Mar 3, 2008 12:52 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Amen brotha!
by 27freethrows on Mar 3, 2008 10:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone else see the DAL-LAL game?
PS. Does anyone else, aside from me of course, like Van Gundy as a commentator? He's knowledgeable and pretty funny
by kingme on Mar 3, 2008 1:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I watched some of it before I had to work
by pookeyguru on Mar 3, 2008 1:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree with your post
PG I think gets the last laugh on his "blow up the team now" direction he has stated from the beginning. I was one of the dewy-eyed optimists that thought the Kings could sneak into a playoff spot.
Now that it is clear they can't, should any veteran be playing 35+ minutes? Is Reggie's job on the line enough that he must play as if every win is for the title?
Ron's comment in the Bee today about being pulled for too long against Miami last week might be correct. But is it worth cutting the young guys minutes to beat the worst team in the league?
Ron only cares about winning every game. What should the Kings/Kings fans care about?
by SavageBeast on Mar 3, 2008 9:06 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Well bro
by pookeyguru on Mar 3, 2008 11:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
RE:
by 27freethrows on Mar 3, 2008 10:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Points All around
I think Artest is a perfect candidate to be the Ray Allen of the 2008 Draft. One of the cellar teams with an aging star is going to get screwed in the lottery and the star is going to start pounding his fists about winning a championship now then poof...Petrie signs and trades Artest for a #5-9 pick.
by NYCFan on Mar 3, 2008 11:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'd love to see that happen NYC
(Basically the Kings can't do ANYTYHING with Artest until after the July Moratorium is lifted).
by pookeyguru on Mar 3, 2008 11:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting. Didn't know that
Can he remain on his contract, with some sort of under the table promise for a renegotiate come July?
by NYCFan on Mar 3, 2008 12:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A player must opt out by June 25th
I know you were referencing Ray Allen being traded to the Celtics. Here are the differences:
- Allen was under contract for the next season
- the 5th pick was not the only thing traded as it has no financial value until the following season, and technically the 2007 draft is still part of the 2006-07 season, and not the 2007-08 season
- I'm not sure Dwyane Wade will make the type of comments Paul Pierce did
by pookeyguru on Mar 3, 2008 1:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, maybe I'm just a little dense here
by SavageBeast on Mar 3, 2008 1:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Salary cap rules prevent it
I hope that explains it.
by pookeyguru on Mar 3, 2008 1:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great explanation Pookie
by SavageBeast on Mar 3, 2008 4:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the compliment
by pookeyguru on Mar 4, 2008 2:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You OWN wikipedia
by 27freethrows on Mar 3, 2008 10:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
While I love me a Wiki reference
by pookeyguru on Mar 4, 2008 2:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So...
by NYCFan on Mar 3, 2008 1:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yes theoretically you could see that
by pookeyguru on Mar 3, 2008 1:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Let me make this very very clear
(This is only a disclaimer. Any suggestions such as mine from a few days ago are heartily welcomed by me. I just want people to understand that Artest can't be traded by the draft. That's all.)
by pookeyguru on Mar 3, 2008 2:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Awsome post
Great follow up posts by everyone else too!
by KK on Mar 3, 2008 6:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks!
by 27freethrows on Mar 3, 2008 10:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great point KK
by pookeyguru on Mar 4, 2008 2:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My hope,
I don't always agree with you, but I always appreciate your comments/diaries here. You put tons of thought and stat research into each of your posts.
The rest of the Kings season without your commentary would definitely be less flavorful.
As for the main point of this diary? I promise to try not to respond to any simply inflammatory/trolling posts in the future.
My patience has been (is being) tried.
by KK on Mar 5, 2008 12:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I've lost patience
by pookeyguru on Mar 5, 2008 12:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I feel you,
by KK on Mar 5, 2008 12:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A little clarification
As always, GO KINGS!
by 27freethrows on Mar 3, 2008 10:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
HEY NOOB
Kidding aside, nice diary. But I believe you are tilting at windmills a bit - when the size of a site increases the way STR has, this kind of thing happens. We had flame wars back in the old days, but not with the regularity that you see them now.
It's not that big of a deal IMO. There are some hot button issues (Ron Artest, Arena deal, etc.) that will force more inflamed opinion, but for most other subjects, it's still pretty civil around here.
by otis29 on Mar 4, 2008 5:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oops, my bad
by 27freethrows on Mar 4, 2008 12:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















