Resuscitive Notes
- Looking at the FTA spread simplifies matters too much. (LA shot 40, Sacramento shot 17.) I hate to say it (you know I do), but Kobe earned most of his FTAs. Every time he got into the lane in the final minutes, he got hacked. There's one sequence in which he did not deserve them, before crunch time, when John Salmons seemed to get the ball cleanly. Which leads me to ask...
- Where the hell was John Salmons in crunch time? We know the preferred Theus lineup used to be PG/Martin/Salmons or Garcia/Artest/Miller at the endgame. It worked quite well, actually. Salmons provides a second strong perimeter defender; Garcia provides a second deadeye shooter. The Kings could have used either. Instead Mikki Moore (God love him) stayed in, assumedly to help rebound and get the spare putback dunk. Circumstances (FTMs on one end, turnovers on the other) did not allow Moore to do what he is capable of doing. I think Salmons could have helped guard Kobe (he played better D than Artest last night, honestly) as well as provided another bailout option on offense.
- Kobe played strong defense on Martin late. After a string of Sacramento miscues, Martin forced it and got stripped on a double-team near the left elbow. LA was fully content to watch Artest shoot, and Artest was fully content to shoot. Why the ball wasn't in Beno's hands the entire stretch is beyond me. And how 60 games into the season Theus hasn't devised a clever way or three to spring Martin free (like, say, a double screen) is likewise beyond my comprehension. The Lakers know he is your best weapon. How do you not realize it?
- Comcast SportsNet should devise a graphic which shows a wick slowly burning as soon as Brad Miller gets fouled without a call. You know the tech is coming, it's just a matter of time.
- Speaking of Miller, that's where the real officiating issues were. Miller should have left the building with 10 FTAs minimum. Gasol was grabbing and flailing and pushing and completely got away with it. Gasol had something like 1 rebound in the first half; he must have realized the refs weren't going to call him for anything, because he got nine rebounds in the second half. Other than this, there were some ticky-tack called on Beno which didn't get whistled on the other end... but the bulk of imbalance happened in the paint.
- That was almost magical. Almost.
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
sigh
by Muff209 on Mar 5, 2008 8:24 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Double screens?
What a frustrating game. The team played well for about 40 minutes - as soon as the Lakers ratcheted up the defensive pressure, the offense devolved into repeated one-on-one opportunities. And during that run by the Lakers in the fourth, how many times did a Kings player hoist up a jumper early in the shot clock without giving the ball to our point guard?
by otis29 on Mar 5, 2008 8:50 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ron Does it Again
Beginning at 4:56 minutes remaining, Ron started jacking up jump shots. He had hit a few earlier in the game, but they had come as the result of his teammates finding him inadequately defended. Yet with the game on the line, he apparently decided that as an "elite" player, he could hit jump shots without unbalancing the opponents defense by moving the ball and that he could continuously hit such shots while entirely guarded.
What happened next? The L.A. defense tightened a bit and Ron's teammates found it more difficult to get open shots. Salmon's missed a layup, Ron missed a 5-footer, and then Brad missed an 11-footer.
At this point, with 3:19 remaining and the Kings now down by 3, Ron decided to put his cape on. Apparently, the Kings are only capable of operating their team offense when the opponent allows them to. The slightest bit of defensive resistance is enough to render our best efforts entirely futile. I don't agree with this, but clearly this is how Ron sees it.
So, here we go. Ron misses a 22-footer; Ron's inability to find an open teammates leads to a shot-clock violation as he dumps of the ball to an entirely guarded Brad and then moments later to an entirely guarded Mikki Moore; Theus tries to run a play for Martin, but he doesn't break the backcourt double team (was he afraid to pass out, thinking he might never see the ball again?); finally, Beno hits a three (notice: zero ball movement on the play. He got the shot off before Ron could demand the ball); Martin misses an 8-footer, but thankfully Mikki cleaned up.
Now it gets really fun. There's 0:55 left and we're down by 5. What's the solution? Ron misses a three; Beno (without any passing whatsoever) misses a three; Ron misses another three; Ron misses another three, Ron misses a final three.
Ron is utterly incapable of putting a team on his back a la Kobe, McGrady, LeBron, or D. Wade. Yet that's fine, we don't need him to be that type of player. He's more than capable of succeeding within a team defense and a team offense. Why does he refuse to see this and accept it? Why does the coach perpetuate it? Does Theus somehow believe that Ron is capable of a Kobe-like performance? His best attempt came in Houston and even then he came up short. He's just simply not good enough to win games singlehandedly and as a consequence becomes a huge liability to his team because of his refusal to accept this truth.
Either Theus must be replaced because of his inability to recognize this or Ron must be replaced because of Theus's inability to constrain him. I'd support the latter because I don't see any other coach doing a better job and I'd rather see John Salmons driving for layups and making free throws (within a team offense) toward the end of the game than continue to witness Ron jacking up jump shots that are entirely defended.
Was the team in trouble toward the end of the game? Sure. Would they have won if Ron hadn't tried to take over? Not necessarily. Yet we do not have a player capable of single-handedly winning games. Therefore, our only hope for the future (besides a fortuitous ping-pong ball), is to learn to win as a team. So long as Ron hinders this, neither Beno, nor Martin, nor any other King will learn how to succeed in crunch situations as a TEAM.
by Kes on Mar 5, 2008 9:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Great post!
by dalt99 on Mar 5, 2008 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ron Artest
That being said, until the coaching staff runs some damn plays for Kevin Martin or even Beno Udrih coming off screens, we will see these types of results whenever the opposing team stiffens their defense.
by section214 on Mar 5, 2008 10:07 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
My Take
- Missed lay-ups. I saw Brad, Beno, Kevin and Artest miss about three lay-ups each. Against any team you can't do that, much less a team with the best record in the Western Conference. Beno should have had about 8 assists if not for all the missed shots.
- Horrible offensive execution in the final 6 minutes. One on one play is NOT going to get it done. NEVER. Maybe against Portland or Atlanta, but not the Lakers. Where was Beno? Where was the top of the key pick-n-roll? Beno is the POINT GUARD and he needs the ball in his hands in the final minutes. That is what he is there for. We don't have a point shooting guard like Kobe and Ron is NOT a point-forward.
- Horrible defensive scheme. OK, this is my biggest problem with last night. WHY was Artest trying to defend Kobe one-on-one. Nobody can defend Kobe 1-1. Sorry. Theus needed to realize this and DOUBLE TEAM him as soon as he touched the ball. You have to make somebody else beat you. Kobe is best when he can go one-on-one and take his man. He is not as good shooting off the pass or playing off the ball.
by dalt99 on Mar 5, 2008 10:33 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
interesting dalt
by Kusian on Mar 5, 2008 10:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
True
by dalt99 on Mar 5, 2008 11:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
what?
by kingsfaninjapan on Mar 5, 2008 11:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Great post TZ
by 27freethrows on Mar 5, 2008 5:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















