How do the Kings improve?
(From the FanPosts. Carl asks all the right questions. - TZ)
The current Kings roster is essentially the same as it was last season. The Kings won 38 games in a stacked Western Conference. How do they get better? Hawes will play better and get more minutes. Maybe Jason Thompson starts by December and puts up All-Rookie team numbers. Beno is more comfortable with the team and has training camp to prepare.
How many wins is that worth? Can this team contend for a playoff spot? Is Geoff Petrie in a position where he has to make a trade to improve the team, or will he go into the season with roster the Kings have now?
PG: Beno Udrih, Sean Singletary
SG: Kevin Martin, Francisco Garcia, Quincy Douby
C: Brad Miller, Spencer Hawes
PF: Mikki Moore, Jason Thompson, Shelden Williams
SF: Ron Artest, John Salmons
Others: Kenny Thomas, Shareef Abdur-Rahim
(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
2 recs |
57 comments
Comments
I put our win range with the
roster as is at 35-45. 45 is if we have few injuries, Miller is in shape, Hawes is stronger, everything goes well. I guess that 45 wins will put us 8-9 in the west. Best case a 5 game 1st round loss. 35 wins is if Martin or Beno get injured, or Artest does something bad, Miller is out of shape. Basically one of the wheels comes off. But I’m optimistic. ;p
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Jul 1, 2008 3:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Who knows?
I think this year is more about evaluating and developing the younger talent, with an eye to next offseason.
One thing I do like about this group is there are some real competitive personalities that will be on the floor most of the time. Artest, Beno, BMiller, Hawes, Cisco, Mikki – all these guys seem to have an edge to their games. Reggie’s cockiness might really translate with these guys, in a “it’s us against the world” way.
Kevin Pritchard stole my daughter's lunch money.
by otis29 on Jul 1, 2008 3:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Carl you bring up a solid point
The lack of training camp for both Hawes and Udrih hurt this team last year big time in terms of maybe success initially.
I think the lack of continuity all year long will remain the most important factor in this team’s success.
The biggest factor with Beno is where his trade value ends up. If it continues to stay high 2 years from now he can be an important trade chip in improving the team in some way.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 1, 2008 3:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Petrie really wants to see what this team can do sans injuries. If the same thing happens, then they’ll start over. Miller, SAR, and Kenny all run out at the same time, which totals 27M in 2010. Simply they would be traded next year, and the Kings would make runs at some free agents the following year. If the Kings play badly this year, Artest will be traded at the deadline. If they are playing well, I think Petrie will try to make a package with Brad Miller that will get the Kings something back to make them even more competitive.
by LiquidPolio on Jul 1, 2008 3:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wait
I thought they wanted to start over since the C-Webb trade. Petrie keeps putting bandages on a leaking ship. Shareef, John, Mikki were all bandages put on the team to avoid completely embarrasing itself with 20 win teams.
I think for the Kings to really take the next step, they need to get under the cap and sign a big time free agent like the signing of Vlade.
BOOK IT!
by kingme18 on Jul 2, 2008 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good question
I agree with Otis that this season will probably be based more around developing the youngsters.
I think the Heat showed us all that roster stability can still throw a huge curveball at your overall success. But I also think that we are obviously in a much different situation than Miami. We have a mix of young and old players, whereas they were pretty much just old. I’m struggling to think of en example of a young team that didn’t make any drastic moves, but ended up having a much better season than the previous one. Please help me out here, because the only thing I can think of is Atlanta, but they are in the East and made a (somewhat) significant move in bringing in Bibby.
"Matt Lauer, up on NBC. You look like a girl, don't talk to me" -Ron Artest
by Exhibit G on Jul 1, 2008 3:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The thing about Miami is
their players with the exception of Wade were all old as hell. Payton, Walker, Posey, Shaq, J-Will. They all had heavy declines. Remember the Miami Wade won the 2006 championship not the Miami HEAT.
BOOK IT!
by kingme18 on Jul 2, 2008 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I should
really read an entire post before i reply.
BOOK IT!
by kingme18 on Jul 2, 2008 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Haslem was fairly young too
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 2, 2008 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another point to remember is that
While the Blazers are primed to get better, it’s also reasonable that Golden State and Denver could suffer serious drop-off’s.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 1, 2008 3:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
GS, Den, SA, PHX - all lose ground (I think)
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on Jul 1, 2008 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's possible
Anything is possible. I still would rather the Kings have the 1st overall pick next season though. That would be more valuable to the franchise long term than the Kings getting the 8th pick.
I think you forgot Dallas in that group, but then again they have Dirk. Maybe not.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 2, 2008 5:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As long as they are fun to watch and are improving, I'll be happy
"Being loquacious and being right aren't necessarily always the same."
GP, the man, the myth, the legend, puts the smackdown on Reggie
by SavageBeast on Jul 1, 2008 4:04 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
With
I am more enthused than I was a year ago, when we had just hired Coach Fuller and drafted the slow, plodding kid. Those two pick ups look a lot better now. So does our acquisition of the oft injured Euro PG that couldn’t even make the Minnesota squad. Gee, all of a sudden I wish folks would talk a little more smack about Jason Thompson.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Jul 1, 2008 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hollinger just said that Thompson was a solid pick....
So we have that going for us.
by moproblemz on Jul 1, 2008 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's crazy, it's crazy...
It’s solid. That way they can say they were right no matter what happens. Of course this was my reaction too.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Jul 1, 2008 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Hollinger's opinion really sways me
He’s the same guy who said the Beno signing was a terrible one. Oh, wait, that’s what we said about the deal at least in terms of the length of the deal anyway. Hollinger is ripping StR off!
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 1, 2008 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who next
Who is a free agent next year that’s when we become good.
by Samhuff999 on Jul 1, 2008 4:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The best part is that you have expiring deals to trade too
That’s the most intriguing thing about 2009.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 1, 2008 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How do the kings improve?
Turn the 15 million that K-9 and Shareef are getting for sitting on the bench into some actual production. Its just a sunk cost at the moment.
by Deleran on Jul 1, 2008 5:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Trade
The way I see it, we have the following expendable pieces:
Douby
Artest or Salmons (though I think Artest is the more tradeable of the two)
K9
Shelden
Trade any combination of those guys for someone like Shaun Marion (NOT saying he’s the guy, just the first guy that popped into my head, and I don’t have time to do a lot of research right now).
We need a proven scorer and defender who can play in a Princeton offense (pass, move without the ball, etc.)
Petrie ought to be able to find a good player with a decent (and reasonably short) contract. Or you guys. Who do you want to trade for?
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on Jul 1, 2008 7:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Kill me now!
Please, please do not use Marion as an example. [EVER] He’s a selfish cancer who cares nothing about winning. Putting up his ‘numbers’ yes, but not winning.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on Jul 1, 2008 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the princeton offence?
are you living in the past????
"everything was beautiful and nothing hurt"
by richmond02 on Jul 1, 2008 11:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We have to find a way to play better and develop our chemistry and youngsters but at the same time achieving a worse record so we get a better pick. :P
Alternatively, trade the whole team for Arenas. No mediocre trade with role player will help.
by ZenBaller on Jul 1, 2008 8:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Picks guarantee nothing
And losing just breeds losing. Once again I remind you of all those (7 i think) top ten picks the Clippers had on thier roster year after dreadful year.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on Jul 1, 2008 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Selective Example
I’ll see your Clippers and raise you some Trailblazers.
The Hawks & Bulls would also probably qualify in the “teams with lots of Top 10 picks”, and while Atlanta was bad for a long time, even they’re starting to look up.
Hoping that the Kings can speed up the development process of the youth on the roster while possibly getting a good draft pick in the process is nothing like what you’re describing.
by smgmatt on Jul 1, 2008 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Use another team other than the Clippers
They’re the worst example of this. There are plenty of teams with top tier picks whom got lucky twice in a row with top picks (Orlando comes to mind) and it changed the nature of their franchise forever.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 2, 2008 5:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Trailblazers who have won nothing?
Potential doesn’t win Championships.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on Jul 1, 2008 9:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Chicago fell apart
The Hawks had a worse record than us – IN THE EAST – and is basically trying again with a rookie.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on Jul 1, 2008 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scratch that
Chicago fell apart under thier expectations and is trying again with a rookie, the Hawks had a worse record than us – in the east, and one of thier prize picks is leaving.
Picks smicks, you have to have a balance – leaning towards veterans.
name me a young team that has won
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on Jul 1, 2008 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Young players are assets.....
That are worth stockpiling when you don’t have a strong squad to begin with, primarily because their low salaries allow you to stay under the cap while creating value and accept higher-salaried vets in trade when the time is right. In fact, I think they are so highly valuable that a team should be aggressive in acquiring them, even at the expected failure rate for rookies and second-year players. If you expand your focus to the top 5-6 teams in the last 10 years, you’ll see that a large number have drafted players who have grown together into winning clubs or so utilized that value that they retain the room to make moves to fortify that talent. I’m thinking Dallas (Dirk/Howard), San Antonio (Parker, Ginobili, Duncan), Miami (Wade, Butler used to acquire Shaq), L*kers (Kobe, Bynum) for starters. Even in the last year, teams that have improved such as Toronto, Atlanta, Utah, and Golden State have had many of their best players on rookie deals. Think about how valuable in a trade a guy like Monta or David Lee or Martin before his extension was. You could package those guys for a pricey vet because their value is so significant compared to their production.
Contrast that with veterans, specifically the veterans on our team. Is Mikki Moore worth $6 million in a trade? No. Salmons? Eh, maybe. Even Ron-Ron’s trade value is proportional to his contract status and salary among other things. What Portland is doing is building value through the draft. We are buying at the top of the market through the MLE and long-term veteran deals. We need to be more aggressively acquiring and building value through young players, both now because we’re capped out with old vets and in the future because it’s the smart way to run a basketball team.
by discocricket on Jul 1, 2008 10:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The number of young teams that have won a championship
is identical to the number of Ron Artest teams that have won a championship.
I’m just sayin’...
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Jul 1, 2008 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shhhhhhhh
Honest, contemplative arguments are no good here. This is all about loony time sir. Please remember that!
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 2, 2008 5:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How old were the Shaq and Hardaway Magic?
I know the didnt win it all and the only reason they won the east was because Jordan was playing the other bball but i dont think that team was too old. Dennis Scott and Nick Anderson were still young and Horace Grant was probably the oldest starter
"everything was beautiful and nothing hurt"
by richmond02 on Jul 1, 2008 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nevermind that they beat Jordan in the series in 95
But that detail doesn’t count because he didn’t start playing hoop until March. Jordan dick suckers please stop this. Chicago lost the series period.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 2, 2008 5:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Name me a championship team without two or three Vets in the starting line-up.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on Jul 1, 2008 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The players on the Blazers will *be* vets in two years.
by Carl on Jul 1, 2008 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
On that note
When does Kevin Martin become a “vet” in this exercise? He’s in the first year of his Extension (not under the umbrella of his Rookie Scale Contract) . . . so is he a Veteran now?
As Carl noted, young players that make it in the L become veterans, so obviously every Championship Team will have “two or three Vets in the starting line-up”. It’s a straw man argument.
by smgmatt on Jul 2, 2008 7:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who needs vets when you have talented leadership laden youth like Brandon Roy
The Blazers have so much young talent, and can easily fill in the gaps with older veteran talent any time they like. Veteran talent is easy to find, but it’s the right veteran talent that is the key. That isn’t always so easy to find.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 2, 2008 5:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
This rings even more true for the Hornets & Chris Paul. David West was also only one year removed from his Rookie Scale contract, so was he a vet or a young talent? The argument just doesn’t hold water when you break it down.
by smgmatt on Jul 2, 2008 7:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And it never will smg
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 2, 2008 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hornets?
Really? David west is in his 6th or 7th year, Pja is a 10 yr guy ect… Paul is the only really young player.
And almost no one on that team was drafted by it, early or otherwise.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on Jul 2, 2008 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
With the 18th pick in the 2003 NBA Draft, the New Orleans Hornets select
He’s got one year on Martin & Beno, and was in the deep LBJ/Melo/Bosh/Wade draft of 2004.
by smgmatt on Jul 2, 2008 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doh.
Martin & Beno were 2004, West was 2003 (I had it right in the title at least).
by smgmatt on Jul 2, 2008 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You got it nearly righty
And your intent was what really counts. “A” for effort smg.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 2, 2008 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is a ridiculous argument
obviously a balance is necessary. the salary cap prohibits any team from being able to play only quality veterans, yet experience is key for a deep playoff run. that is why the Rondos, Maxiels, and Vujacic…s (guys on rookie contracts that can be trusted to contribute) of the world are as important as the allstars they play with. having picks guarantees nothing, but nor does surrounding an allstar with dead weight and bad contracts.
by furious.d on Jul 1, 2008 9:46 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I know one thing:
we have a long way to go.
Kevin is the only thing close to a sure bet on the roster. Miller, Artest, K9 and Sharif are the past. If we’re serious about rebuilding none of them will be with the team by the end of next season. I like Francisco. In fact I like him a lot. But he’s a guy you want coming off the bench. We need to cut bait on Douby.
Hawes is not my idea of the kind of center we want or need on the team in terms of defensive ability and athleticism, but that’s what we’ve got for the time being.
When I squint my eyes I can see light at the end of the tunnel, but it might be the proverbial freight train bearing down on us, in the form of a 25 win season.
OK, I just decided: I’m gonna work up a (somewhat) quasi-realistic plan to get the Kings back into contention by 2010. Should be able to post it by the end of the week. If Petrie uses any of it he can vote me a playoff share. ;>)
"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)
by Mucho Moss on Jul 1, 2008 10:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
As long as K-9 stays in the locker room
I’ll enjoy rooting for the whole Kings line-up no matter who’s on the floor, no matter how many games they lose…errr…wait. Add Dark-Artest to the K-9 list (so that’s Ron for 1 of every 3 games)...oh and whiney Miller (at least one half of every other game). Then there’s the moody “I didn’t get to start so I won’t score any points” Salmons we’ll see every other game. Soft Beno rolling on the floor holding his shin makes me cringe (a quarter a game). I suppose I can’t judge the rookies yet so they’re wild cards.
Okay. Nevermind. These folks better over achieve—winning always makes the character flaws more palatable.
So much for my moment of blind optimism.
by BrooklynFan on Jul 2, 2008 6:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Assuming no trades…
Dream Scenario
PG – Beno matures into a 16-6 type of guy, runs the team fairly well, and doesn’t get completely abused on defense. Our rookie PG gets some decent burn in garbage time, learns the ropes.
SG – K-Mart continues his ascension into the NBA elite, offering McGrady-like numbers (25-5-5) in a much more efficient manner. Douby finally comes into his own and starts to contribute meaningful minutes off the bench, averaging 12 pts a night, but spiking up to 20+ on random games.
SF – Artest behaves and realizes this is not his team to run. Becomes an extremely valuable trade asset, as he contributes on both ends of the floor. Most notably he stops shooting so much. Garcia fills in with great defense and passing at times when Artest hits the bench or shifts to the 4 spot.
PF – Thompson gives us energy off the bench, with his only goal being to grab every rebound that comes his way and alter opposing guards shots when he can. Artest plays some PF. Mikki Moore plays decently enough; most notably, his hands improve (hey this is a dream scenario, remember?)
C – Miller plays lesser minutes due to age, but is effective in those minutes. Hawes starts getting 20-25 mins a night, and becomes Miller 2.0, with more of a post game.
Bench – Salmons learns to play well off the bench. Doubster, as mentioned, begins to contribute scoring and timely 3s off the pine. Perhaps The Landlord can be a great energy guy and help us out in the rebounding department.
In the brutal Western Conference, I feel this Kings team (in my dream scenario) has the capability to go 42-40, maybe slip into the #9 spot =(
by sactoreg on Jul 2, 2008 7:55 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That's sad
When the 9th spot in the West is your team’s dream scenario.
by Mityt on Jul 2, 2008 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And that's including Artest buddy
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 2, 2008 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I’m inclined to agree with this scenario, which is why I posed the question. Changes need to be made. I think (hope) Artest’s latest comments mean he’s on his way out. That won’t immediately lead to more wins, but it should allow the team to get younger and will help out in the long term.
by Carl on Jul 2, 2008 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'll win more games
45-47 with this current line-up – if we stay healthy and play as hard as last year.
I don’t think however that this will be the line-up. More changes coming by Feb. What changes exactly? Hell I don’t know.
A trade will happen though.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on Jul 2, 2008 5:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If I'm lucky
I get to hear you bitch all summer. :)
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Jul 2, 2008 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Artest and K-mart are the key
Both these guys will score 20 points a night consistently, but if they can’t stay healthy like this year the Kings will not be able to compete. We all know Artest will shut down his opponent, play hard every game and will knock some bodies around while trying to accomplish those tasks. Kevin Martin is one of the best shooter/scorers in the league and he will be the scoring leader. The question is who is going to be the Kings post presence? Artest will post up but he is not a true post player. I don’t see Brad Miller or Spencer Hawes being dominating that all the good West teams have. I think Petrie will need to make a trade or somehow acquire a solid post player, but I don’t know who that will be. I really like Mikki Moore’s energy and his athletic ability but he just does not have the offensive weapons to be a solid post player. He is a pick and roll and an alley-oop type player. He likes to play around the bucket. I think he can score 10 points a game off of offensive rebounds/dunks from a pick a roll.
I am interested to see how this season plays itself out because there is a lot of new talent in the West.
Joe
by pointguard10 on Jul 5, 2008 4:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















