Maloofs Strike Back
From Sam Amick in The Bee:
"He has to balance the way he acts," Joe Maloof said by phone. "He's got to control his emotions a little better. You've got to try and keep your cool a little bit.
"Take a deep breath and quit flying off the handle with comments that don't make sense. I hate to say it that way, but that's how I feel. It doesn't make sense to me."
It doesn't make sense to me either, but it remains impossible to be surprised by anything Ron Artest says (or, uh, emails).
Meanwhile, before Ron-Ron got the message he talked to the Rocky Mountain News.
"I cannot play in Denver because they question my drive to finish my career off strong and not embarrass my family," Artest wrote.
Artest wasn't specific when asked who might have been critical of him. He also was asked if this means he won't consider Denver as a 2009 free agent.
"That's not even an option to be a Nugget," he wrote. "They let me know how they felt about me already."
Way to do Geoff Petrie's job, dude.
0 recs |
219 comments
Comments
Hmm.
What other teams can Artest alienate himself from further driving down his value?
by dkons21 on
Jul 15, 2008 6:28 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Seems to me like a PR statement
The Maloof’s like Artest, and always have it seems, but let the long contract decisions remain to Petrie (a wise decision, or better than picking which players long term you retain) in a sense. A couple of things I would like to say.
Lamar Odom for Artest/Thomas works.
What if Wally Szczerbiak/future 1st for Artest/Thomas goes down? (Gives the Cavs cap room in 2 years regardless of LeBron, and always gives them a chance to put LeBron/Artest together as a duo. That is another relationship that would be hard for Artest to question right? Also matching up with Pierce might be easier.) That would be just as swell wouldn’t it? Removing K9’s contract plus getting a 1st round choice and elminating salary for next season and the problem of Artest. That would be my preferred trade of choice if I had one.
Last but not least, it seems like the Maloof’s are making a PR statement to players out there listening. We can value you all we want, but we don’t override our basketball people. (Ron thought they did apparently, or seemingly, by the flying off the handle type of statements.) I’m not one for conspiracy theory’s because I find them boring, but what if Petrie conveyed these type of sentiments along to the family before Joe did the “phone interview” with Sam Amick? Doesn’t those words that Joe uttered smack of Geoff Petrie’s omega type insistence when running a franchise?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 6:48 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I hope Ron gets the message...
Namely, the Kings can’t trade him anywhere worthwhile (for him, or for us) if he keeps crossing teams off the already short list of suitors.
In addition, his agent (Bill Artest? Stephens?) should explain to him the salary repercussions of consistently speaking out against the team. It was best said a couple days ago: Ron is a $15mil a year talent, but with $5mil a year dependability/professionalism/off-court behavior.
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 7:01 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I also added
When I made the 15/5 comments that that makes him a good deal for $8 million-$10 million a year.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 15, 2008 11:28 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not a fan of the proposed Miami trade
that Amick brings up. I don’t think he does one thing well enough to be a good fit for our team.
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 6:50 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think opening a spot for Ewing/Singletary might be the single best thing
that the Artest/K9 trade could do. Why waste roster spots on players you don’t need?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 7:15 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Just so we're clear...
We all agree that it is now a complete certainty that Ron ends up as a Nugget, right?
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on
Jul 15, 2008 7:01 AM PDT
reply
actions
1 recs
Ha, Ha, Ha.
Exhibit G. should do stand-up!
by dkons21 on
Jul 15, 2008 7:18 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
OK
Who gave the Maloof’s the “hatorade?”
Poor Ron. He does nothing and yet everyone gangs up against him.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on
Jul 15, 2008 7:24 AM PDT
reply
actions
1 recs
Way
To beat the beat the dead horse on the whole “hater” thing. I used to think you were one of the more clever, witty posters on here..But you “hater” posts after any negative comments about Ron Ron are pretty lame.. owell, maybe, youll regain your comedic style once the season starts up again, cause i do enjoy your posts for the most part.
I don’t recall people ever saying that Ron Ron did “nothing” (I could be wrong about that though!). I DO recall people (myself included) saying that he NEEDS to stop emailing stupid comments to the media and that we, as fans shouldnt get so bent out of shape as to every comment he does make, so long as he backs it up come tip-off.
With that being said, it looks like he will without a doubt, not be playing in Sac Town this year. I would have liked to see Artest,Martin and Beno for an entire year, but I can live with his departure so long as we get some peices back.
by Hoops916 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:35 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Channel your rage...
Section isn’t the enemy here dude and he is the wittiest poster I have ever read. Your post wreaks of the self realization that Ron Artest is really crazy and can’t control himself in the least bit, and maybe, just maybe we have been right and you have been wrong.
Hot dogs, get your hot dogs.
by jjham15 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:43 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As..
I mentioned before, I usually enjoy ALL of Sections Posts on here. I wouldnt respond to the man (I’m assuming he’s a guy, although LPA already schooled me on gender assumptions ha) if I didnt hold his posts in high regard. Nothing more nothing less!
I was just giving him a hard time about the past few days seeing “hater” after any posts that condemned Artests (Sarcastically, of course)Thats all. ..I find a good number of people on STR routinely doing that, which is fine, but certaintly not witty!
by Hoops916 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:53 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sometimes you have to search for the compliment
916, quite frankly I jumped in rather late on the “hater” wagon. I just found the whole thing rather amusing. I think (and I could be wrong) that you coined the word “hatorade.” If not, kudos to whoever did.
I’ve always felt that my best comments come in a collaborative setting. That is, it is what everyone else says around here that enables me to be so glib witty humorous lame. You are certainly among that group, and I always appreciate your perspective, even when I don’t agree with it.
Sorry if I struck a nerve. I threw one more “hater” out in another post tonight before I picked up your comment. Out of respect for you I’ll stop.
(Resisting urge to type “hater” one more time…)
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on
Jul 15, 2008 7:34 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hatorade Origins?
Hatorade has been around for as long as haters with a thirst for hate (from snacking on too many hater tots?) feel the need to hate the true players instead of the game itself.
Don’t worry, just put on some Hater Blockers and keep on stunnin’.
Ok, that’s all I got.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 7:53 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks for the update
StR is also where I learned what “pwned” meant…I don’t get out much.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on
Jul 15, 2008 7:59 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ironically
Neither did the people who coined “pwned”!
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 8:00 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But of course
That MUST be it. LOL. Channel your ego.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 15, 2008 11:30 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What kind of pieces are you talking about?
Seriously you can be as glib as you want, but until you define it, I personally won’t bother to take anything you say seriously regarding to Artest. That is, unless you’re attempt to clearly portray him in a different light than some people have chosen to (like me).
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Umm
I’d probobly do the Odom for Artest/K-9 Trade
I sure as hell wouldnt trade Artest for your aforementioned Wally/1st round deal!!!.... that, I can’t take seriously!!!!
Hope that clears it up for ya
by Hoops916 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:55 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It does actually
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 8:56 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Now I have a better question
What’s better about the Odom idea vs the Szczerbiak idea?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 8:57 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Darn it Pookey!
Not only did you beat me to this question, but you posted twice while I was typing it!
Grrrrr.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 8:58 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry I wish I only posted once too
Typing 12 words is alot easier than typing 40 with an attempt at clear chain of thought.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 8:59 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I got ya..
I don’t really see where a player like Wally could fit in with the Kings. He has a fantastic shot, and he LIT the Kings up not too long ago when he played for the Sonics (I’m sure I’m not the only player who remembers that game?) However, I see his skills, outside of his shot, to be extremely limited. I don’t see him meshing well with the Salmons/Garcia tandem, who I believe are both better ballplayers than Wally, and whose games are more diverse…..
with that being said, I like the idea of getting another 1st rounder… That would be the kicker of this deal. however, with Bron Bron, you know the Cavs aernt gonna earning anything better than a late-mid to late 1st round pick. And as an avid college hoops fan (this year proved my theory again), I just dont see 20-25 good ball players who can contribute coming out year after year.
As for my acceptance of Odom. I think he would immediately help to fill the rebounding void on the Kings. (Aside from the rook), Miller and Hawes (Feel free to throw sheldon and SAR in there) aernt exactly your definition of athleticism. Last year, the Kings were restrained by gravity in a league where athleticism is 1/2 the battle! Odom would instantly give our squad a formitable scorer, who is athletic and can grab boards. I think he and Hawes would complimant eachother nicely!
by Hoops916 on
Jul 15, 2008 9:09 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay to continue this
Odom and Szczerbiak have expiring contracts after this season. With Wally I can see the team cutting him, and saving money in the process by doing so, and have the benefit of having his contract expire at the end of the season. I don’t think Wally is about anything more than a contract dump, and save a million or two in the process. The draft pick, and the actual removal of K9’s contract, is where the actual value is.
The draft pick argument is true. It won’t be a high draft pick, but teams don’t trade those anyway Hoops. That’s why you hear the term “trade protected up to the 3rd pick, 5th pick, 10th pick, lottery protected”. The Kings won’t get a top 5 pick from any deal until at least 5-7 years down the road. Waiting that long is just not realistic from any point of view.
As far as Odom he is also has an expiring contract. I agree that he would help the team with rebounding, but he isn’t particularly athletic. He’s a smooth player whom can help the team in ball handling and rebounding. But he’s also a SF/PF who isn’t exactly an alpha omega type which is why the Lakers, according to Ric Bucher, are so willing to deal him.
Now, and this is for your benefit more than mine. I don’t think it matters whether Odom comes here for 3 reasons. The Kings won’t have great rebounding from Moore Miller and perhaps Shawes/ Thompson. I fail to see where Odom’s strengths net great returns for the Kings overall, besides giving them an additional exceptional ballhandler at the F spot. Also, beyond that part, (and that’s a fairly big part isn’t it?), you have the fact that Odom may not want to return to a team that may not include him in future plans with a big money deal. I just don’t really see how acquiring Odom helps, outside of shedding K9’s contract.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 9:20 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice
Nice work Pookey, however, I’m still gonna roll with the Odom trade.
I fully understand the “lottery protected” 1st round trade scenario, however, I’d feel much more comfortable with a Clippers, Pacers, or Warriors pick that might land in the 13-17 range (Although that a moot point I guess)
Your right in your assesment of Odom. Although he doesnt SEEM to be athletic, but rather “smooth”, the truth is that he is pretty damn athletic. Similar to how Deron williams doesnt appear to be fast, or Marion’s shot doesnt appear to be a good NBA shot…The fact of the matter is that many players are deceivingly unique at fooling with fans perception of them. Thats how I see Odom. I think he athleticism is one of his strengths, hell you could argue that at any point of the game he could essentially spot for 1-5 on the court..Thats unique! I think he can come in and essentially steal Moores minutes while giving us a capable rebounder and scorer. Plus, he is LONG, and presents somewhat of a defensive presence “inside.” (although not a great one) But Hawes and Miller are defensive laughingstocks (Hawes will get better) down low, and aside from taking charges (which he is damn good at) Moore isnt exactly a threat to opposing offenses either!. He won’t cure this problem for the Kings, but he’ll help to curtail it.
As far as the free agency thing. I’d prefer to watch Odom for half the year and see how he fits. If we overacheive, I see nothing wrong with preparing to offer him a nice deal. If he doesnt, then we are in the same position we are now, we look for the best availiable trade before the deadline (or start of the season in our current situation). I’m somewhat of an optimist when it comes to Free Agency, for that I’ll take fault…...And you brought up great points, but im still ridin with the Odom package (which includes K-9) over the Wally one!
by Hoops916 on
Jul 15, 2008 9:41 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree with you on Odom
He seems quite athletic to me. I think you are right, it might be his smoothness that kind of covers up his actual athleticism.
I’m definitely on the Odom bandwagon – I’ve always liked his game, and I think he might flourish if he gets away from Kobe, Phil etc.
Kevin Pritchard has Chuck Norris tied up in the trunk of his car.
by otis29 on
Jul 15, 2008 10:11 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It wasn't an actual criticism but my perception of Odom
Actually I think he reminds me a ton of Magic Johnson in style and Magic wasn’t that athletic either. That being said I like his game in some ways, and I have no doubt he can help the Kings. I’m not convinced Odom is what the Kings ultimately need though. (That’s been said about 800 times now. Stating “Why” is not necessary anymore.)
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 10:14 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I totally see your side of that
And I don’t know if procuring Odom is the best or smartest deal the Kings could get. It’s just a feel thing for me, from watching Odom play quite a bit, that he could be a nice piece for the upcoming season, even on an extended basis.
I won’t be disappointed if we don’t get him though – many of the other deals being bandied about here would be fine as well. Ultimately, getting another team to take K9 in a deal would be huge, no matter what kind of talent comes back in the short term.
Kevin Pritchard has Chuck Norris tied up in the trunk of his car.
by otis29 on
Jul 15, 2008 10:18 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We're arguing shades of grey at this point
I’m looking forward to tonight with the Summer League game on NBATV. I’m not looking forward to Rick Kamia (however you spell that dork’s name) or Steve Jones (one of the worst possible choices to talk about Summer League) talk. I am looking excited to seeing every guy on the Summer League 6 that we’ve bandied about in the future of this team.
Otis, you and I disagree about many things ranging on many subjects, but Odom’s talent/skill/athleticism isn’t one of them. But we all agree on StR that removing Kenny Thomas’ contract is a huge component to any Artest deal. There is never any arguing with that.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 10:22 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I still haven't seen
a proposed trade for Artest that makes the Kings a better team.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 15, 2008 11:33 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Let's see
Artest/Thomas for Odom:
SF/PF starters change from Artest/Moore to Salmons/Odom or Garcia/Odom.
Using PER from last season: Before 18.89/11.50(total=30.39). After 14.00/16.94(30.94) or 15.16/16.94(32.10)
Artest/Thomas for Marion:
SF/PF starters change from Artest/Moore to Salmons/Marion or Garcia/Marion.
Using PER from last season: Before 18.89/11.50(total=30.39). After 14.00/19.32(33.32) or 15.16/19.32(34.48)
PER isn’t perfect, but based on one of the only reasonable ways to measure overall talent, it would seem that both of those trades could make us a better team.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on
Jul 16, 2008 5:11 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
At best
It’s a wash. You water down one position and improve the other, plus you weaken your bench. Next.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 16, 2008 7:48 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
PFs are harder to get than SFs
and Garcia/Salmons can absorb extra minutes no problem.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on
Jul 16, 2008 8:09 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
value?
in many ways, odom and wally are the same….both expiring contracts that are likely not in the kings’ long-term plans. it seems that to evaluate the value of odom vs. wally, you need to also look at the purpose of the season. how well are the kings going to do?
if we were close to making a playoff push, odom might have more value to us, in terms of shoring up some weaknesses (rebounding) to push us over the playoff hump. maybe the kings like what he offers, decides to make him a part of the team and improve on role-players to better the team. however…
if you’re looking at something like a sub-40 win season, odom hurts us. he would improve the team enough to net us a cruddier draft pick, just to leave after the season to free agency. i can see how wally would look better in this light.
i realize this is a pretty pessimistic view of things, but i can’t seem to ignore it…
by sactoreg on
Jul 15, 2008 10:27 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why are you so sure Odom
would not be in our future plans? Not saying he is for sure. But how can you be so sure he isn’t? Sounds like you’re placing a lot of confidence in JT coming out of the gates fast. I’d rather trade MM and have Odom and JT as my primary options. Obviously with K-9 (woof) gone.
"Being loquacious and being right aren't necessarily always the same."
GP, the man, the myth, the legend, puts the smackdown on Reggie
by SavageBeast on
Jul 15, 2008 10:40 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that is true
i agree, i don’t know for sure whether odom is part of the kings future….if we acquired him, he very will might be.
but having just drafted a PF, combined with the age of Odom, the salary he will likely command as a free agent, and the cap space we’re trying to have in a couple years, something tells me he would not be a part of our future. it’s not that i have a lot of confidence in JT…but petrie and the kings organization just drafted him, so they are confident to a degree.
it is mostly a money thing though…if odom decided he wanted to re-up with the kings at a cheap price, then i would be fine with him hanging around.
by sactoreg on
Jul 15, 2008 10:53 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Question
I’m not saying I disagree with you, but why not?
Do you see Odom being re-signed as a piece for the Kings to build upon, or do you think Odom has more value in another trade before the ‘08 Trade Deadline, or in a S&T next year?
I can’t think of any other reasons that make the Odom deal than the Wally one, especially with a Pick in the latter but not the former.
Just curious.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 8:57 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Odom over Wally....
Odom is better than anything we have right now at the power. The transition to Jason Thompson as a starting four (if that ever happens which we hope will) is going to take a little time. So as a Kings fan, wouldn’t you rather see Lamar Odom as your starting power instead of Mikki Moore? Odom has a very specific skill set that the Kings not only need but covet. He rebounds and he is another one of those versatile guys. Maybe Odom is a rent-o-player and leaves either at the deadline, the end of the season or as a sign and trade but it is also possible that he finds a home in Sacramento and plays here a few more years. If Thompson develops faster than expected? Shift Odom tot he three and let Salmons come off the bench because lets face it, Odom is better than the Kings options at either the three or the four.
Wally is nothing but contract relief, I wouldn’t even want to seem him suit up.
Hot dogs, get your hot dogs.
by jjham15 on
Jul 15, 2008 9:17 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
true
I think when you compare the Wally/Odom trades, you’ve got obvious tradeoffs. Do you take Odom, who we know would contribute at least something this year, versus Wally (who replicates K-Mart’s shooting without his other intangibles).
Another trade off is losing out on a first round pick to get a guy (Odom) who would actually get some minutes. Of course, any first-rounder from Cleveland is bound to be pretty late in the draft (thanks Eastern Conference) but it’s a pick nonetheless. I’m sure we would have loved to have it this year.
All things said, I’d still prefer the Odom deal.
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 9:24 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I disagree with that
That type of thinking is how the Kings got a very difficult logjam to solve at the swing spots by continuing to bring in players at those spots to be as competitive as possible during the interim.
I dont dislike Odom or what he can bring, and I have no doubt he brings more than Mikki Moore or John Salmons to a limited degree by any stretch, but I don’t see the point of bringing in a guy for a single season on a team that may struggle to win 41 times next season. That is a stretch to me.
The whole deal with Wally allows you to do other things with your roster (cutting him would be my preference) and it cuts down the money on the total roster by a couple million (and saves an extra million or two by waiving him and having him sign elsewhere). You can use that savings to trade for a Luke Ridnour/Earl Watson type of player who fit, in my opinion, a greater need at backup PG if Singletary isn’t the type of player the Kings can fill that position immediately. It also allows for a contigency of some sort as well. Personally I don’t feel the Kings need to find minutes in the front court, but need to find minutes for players in the backcourt. That is the greater need at this point.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 9:26 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cutting Wally vs. S&T of Odom...
Wally gives you no value except for maybe a late first round pick, at least with Odom you have some possible value in the off-season or at the deadline. Late first round picks can be bought for 3 million, if the Kings need one they can just buy one.
Hot dogs, get your hot dogs.
by jjham15 on
Jul 15, 2008 9:42 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
An expiring contract has no value
You think paying 10 million in luxury tax (if the Kings keep Bibby) is an intelligent idea?
I don’t believe in possible value. I think it’s a dumb idea, and will think it’s a dumb idea for several reasons. One is that you have to take money back in a S&T, and two, there is no guarantee that Odom’s own plans don’t derail this scenario. S&T’s are just overrated idea’s that are only useful with limited options for a player in a free agent market.
Why buy one? Petrie doesn’t seem to like putting alot of young players together all at once anyway (on a team roster for the season)? Why not just use your asset’s the way you have them to line up a better potential player down the road? There’s a far greater possibility of a player being high to impossibly high value with a late Cav’s pick than there is getting something significantly worth of Odom in a S&T.
I understand the argument, and I see the point. I don’t see how the Kings can be better off with a short term investment in Odom and buying an extra late 1st rounder in the future if they deem it necessary. That 1st round pick doesn’t necessarily have to be used for the Kings either. It can always be used as an asset in another trade down the road. I think the possibility of your scenario has less feasibility than mine does based simply on how teams usually deal. They only do deals in their favor, and both scenario’s you’ve presented don’t seem to do that.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 9:48 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It seems to me
The S&T question with Odom is basically a $3M gamble. If they get something for him in a S&T, it would likely be better than a late 1st round pick, and if they don’t get anything they could still pick up a late 1st for $3M (or not).
Remove the ”$3M gamble” portion and Odom helps the team now more than Wally, which might sway the three parties with the most control/say: GP, the Maloofs, and Theus.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 9:54 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it would also mean though
That this team is continually on the luxury tax threshold which no team wants to be on. This team is consistently making moves based on how close to the luxury tax it is, and they’ve used the MLE 4 years in a row now. (Beno aside, the other 3 were pure choices to do so over the FA market.) By doing a S&T with Odom you’re increasing your salary for next season without removing any players of big salary off the team (miller namely), and you’re increasing any potential salary with an extension for Cisco and any 1st round pick you probably have.
I personally think building slowly, and without the edge of trying to win games this upcoming season, is a smarter play for a franchise that is trying to rebuild on the fly. It’s trying to dodge bullets, and the only thing it’s dodging, is a clear outlook on the future. It’s about time the team change it’s thinking it if wants to move ahead with plans of contending a championship. Because keeping a team in the middle only does that.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 10:02 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We seem to be forgetting that with LO at PF, the Lakers went to the Finals
I say take a guy who “might” be your answer at 4, but who expires anyway over a guy who “won’t” be your answer at anything. The only think that would swing the trade differently would be a pick that actually might make a difference “top ten,” or the fact that Artest goes out of the conference. And the last point matters very little to me in a deal like the Lakers where we are going to lose to them whther they have Artest or not.
"Being loquacious and being right aren't necessarily always the same."
GP, the man, the myth, the legend, puts the smackdown on Reggie
by SavageBeast on
Jul 15, 2008 10:07 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This isn't about the Lakers
This is about opening up the team to be successful in the future by not constricting itself to immediacy of what talent it receives. Yes, with the Odom deal you ship out K9, but with any Odom deal, you might have to let him walk after the end of the season to avoid any serious salary repercussions. Beyond that even, he’s an un-restricted FA who has any option he wants limiting the Kings power in this type of deal.
Wally isn’t a sexy deal, but it’s a necessary one. Agree or no, that’s a reality of today’s NBA. You gotta take a step back before you can take a step forward. (The Jazz tried to do the same thing, and suffered an AK47 injury that saw them eventually net Deron Williams. It’s a necessary step.)
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 10:11 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't disagree with you
And I’d take WZ and a 1st over nothing. But my point is that everything else being equal, Odom might be our answer at 4. Not saying that he will be or that we can afford him as a free agent. But if he joins the Kings, we have the option of unloading MM/SW. If we take WZ, he are essentially trading Artest for cap space and a pick only.
"Being loquacious and being right aren't necessarily always the same."
GP, the man, the myth, the legend, puts the smackdown on Reggie
by SavageBeast on
Jul 15, 2008 10:16 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
On my recent Fan Post (Shamelessly Plugging is what the PR game is all about baby!!)
I said I project the Kings salary keeping Artest, and signing Singletary/Ewing Jr to contracts would put them around the 70.5 million range, and roughly 775 K under the luxury tax limit.
If you take Wally’s contract off the books starting next season, you may not have cap room, but you guard yourself against the salary cap going down if the salary cap goes down (it’s always possible). It also allows your team a chance for more flexiblity in any deal it chooses for next season.
I’m in favor of trying to get better on the court this season if it that’s what the Kings need, but it’s not. The Kings are not the Hawks either. Dysfunctional ownership paralyzes everything regarding the team, and that’s what’s sorta happened with the Hawks.
That being said I think Odom being on the court is a marginal improvement over Artest’s up & down performances, and I don’t see how the team doesn’t beenfit from Artest’s mercurial performances when this team hit’s a lull (which it will—every marginal team hits a lull). I don’t think Odom is the safeguard some are projecting him to really be.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 10:29 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm confused...
if we enact the Wally trade, how do we “take Wally’s contract off the books”? Buyout?
If that’s the case, why don’t we just buyout k-9?
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 10:31 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"...starting next season"
WZ has an Expiring Contract, and will not be on the books in 2009.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 10:33 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
To Elaborate
When a player is bought out they still count against the salary cap, but that frees up a roster spot.
If the Kings bought out K9 then they could not include him in any trades (i.e. packaged with Artest), as he would no longer be on the roster.
The plus side is that in a buyout sitiuation, a player can choose to take a reduced amount of the salary they are due in the remainder of the contract, and that lower number is used against the cap instead of the original salary amount . . . the catch being that players rarely take much of a discount at all, because once they’re paid they can play for the minimum where ever they want to (less salary means more flexibility).
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 10:36 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yahtzee!!!!
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 10:37 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
thanks guys.
for what it’s worth, I was going for the record on “narrowest reply”
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You waive Wally
Then if he re-signs with another team (Could be Cleveland actually) that amount would be deducted from the amount the Kings would have to pay Wally, and it would reduce how much his salary would count against the Kings cap this year.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 10:33 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But if LO works out
we can possibly resign him at a lower rate while trading MM. If I only thought Odom could help us for next year, I wouldn’t care one way or the other. But I think he could be a legit PF for the next 5 years or so. If not., no loss.
"Being loquacious and being right aren't necessarily always the same."
GP, the man, the myth, the legend, puts the smackdown on Reggie
by SavageBeast on
Jul 15, 2008 10:38 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Perhaps
I think it’s alot of money, and alot of “what ifs” to commit to a player who can just simply sign elsewhere after the season, and what you got was getting into the 1st round, and and a quick exit.
I also think ti’s important to remember that Odom has gotten hurt playing PF for the Lakers over the previous several seasons, and that’s an important point to remember. I don’t think he’s a natural PF, and I don’t think there’s any way to get past that.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 10:41 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
if you waive him
is he then a free agent? I don’t think anyone would want him straight up for his current contract, but if he can sign a new deal…
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 10:40 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes he can sign a new deal
But that being said nobody is going to sign him to a 13 million dollar deal either. It just isn’t going to happen. So him signing for a veteran’s minimum this year isn’t a big deal at all. It cuts down how much he costs the Kings in salary, and it keeps the cost of getting his services (to whatever team signed him under that scenario) to a minimum. Works out for everybody.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 10:42 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well...
I agree, especially with this statement:
...building slowly, and without the edge of trying to win games this upcoming season, is a smarter play for a franchise that is trying to rebuild on the fly.
I was simply pointing out what the Kings braintrust has been historically noted for doing. The difference in this philosophy and the one I’d like them to have is gigantic. My dream is for the Kings to win a Championship, I’m not satisfied just to annually contend for the bottom-half of the playoffs.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 10:08 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Until next seaon when they shed 20 mill in salary.
Between Williams, Douby and Odom, the Kings could clear up major cap space at the end of the year. If they need more space, they can buy out Moore.
Hot dogs, get your hot dogs.
by jjham15 on
Jul 15, 2008 10:47 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Remember
The Kings are just under the Luxury Tax Threshold of $71.15M (according to BallHype – the first link I hit) this year.
They would currently have to shed roughly $12.5M just to get down to the $58.68M Salary Cap this year, so assuming that the cap & tax go up along with the raises that are in place for existing Kings’ contracts, that leaves $7.5M available under the cap (or $11-12M without Mikki).
Also of note in this scenario is that there would be 4 roster spots to fill (Odom, Williams, Douby, & Moore) with that money.
I just wanted to keep the idea of dumping salary into perspective, because it won’t be a dollar of cap space for every dollar shed, but it could put the Kings in a position to pick up a player next year.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The flip side to that argument is that
the Kings could be so close to luxury tax they have to make a difficult decision that could end up hurting the team more in the long run. That’s why I favor the Wally deal now. Rather than dealing with that prospect, let the team assess what it needs next off-season rather than playing the what-if game the next 5 years. The “What if” game is so tired.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:38 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Huh?
I don’t see how using Wally as an Expiring Contract is any different than using Lamar Odom as an Expiring Contract.
I get the difference in trades (DRAFT PICK!), but how does it affect the Salary Cap/Luxury Tax any differently?
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 12:41 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In of itself it doesn't
You mis understood me so I’ll try to be more clear this time. First off as expiring’s they mean the same thing of course. But the difference is that Wally has no interest or talent skill set he brings to the table and is expendable to the team by waiving him. You can’t do that with Odom. Another reason I bring that up is that you can’t just not play Odom while having him. Dude is a top 50 NBA player, and that’s the way it goes. So if you’re looking to get a s&t outta Odom, or simply deal him at some point, the value from Odom vs Wally is totally different because of both players abilities at this point. That’s what I was trying to get at. Sorry if it wasn’t clear.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:49 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think I follow
So you’re saying that Wally’s better for the Franchise because aside from costing less (after signing with another team) he won’t take away playing time from the youth (or hurt the draft pick as a secondary result), correct?
I totally see that line of thinking.
That said, I’m still on the fence about which deal I prefer.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 12:52 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree with you
Ridnour may not be a starter, but he would be a solid backup, and a change of scenery could be beneficial. But, naturally if it becomes Artest for Ridnour and savings, that’s not much of a deal.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 15, 2008 11:36 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Beating a dead horse
Is when you Artest backers continue the deception that the “haterz” think Ron is a shitty basketball player or that the team isn’t better with him on the court than off.
Kevin Pritchard has Chuck Norris tied up in the trunk of his car.
by otis29 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:49 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm one of the minority (or maybe not)
That the KIngs are better off on the court immediately without Ron too. I admit to that. Many want him gone because of the ultimate bigger picture. I want him gone period. There is a difference between such.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 8:53 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Semi-agree
I think the team is better off with him gone IF he’s going to play Sybil all year long. There is no doubt, the guy has the potential on any given night to throw the team on his back.
But long-term, it’s pretty clear the guy wants to be gone, and will be gone the first chance he gets. So let’s get something back of value for him.
Kevin Pritchard has Chuck Norris tied up in the trunk of his car.
by otis29 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:55 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah that's what I mean
We all diagree to what shades of brilliance Ron-Ron is.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 8:56 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Actually
It’s pretty clear he would have liked to stay. And quite frankly, it probably wouldn’t have taken a lot to lock him up for 3-4 more seasons – just $8 million-$10 million a year and a few “We love you, Ron”s.
With him they are potentially a 40-50 win team, and they can continue to add players like they just did in the draft or via other approaches to replace the players like Miller, SAR, K9, etc. that will be coming off contract. And that’s a more likely path to the promised land than dumping one of your two best players for someone else’s crap.
I mean, really, why are we talking about WALLY Z? Can we at least confine the conversation to the top say 100 players in the NBA?
Petrie isn’t buying this line, so maybe it shouldn’t be sold.
If you have the Venus de Milo, do you whack off another arm to make it look better, or do you try to fix the thing?
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 15, 2008 11:47 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
WE don't know what Petrie's thinking and neither do you
All we have is his past history. Stop writing what Petrie thinks when you aren’t Geoff Petrie.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 16, 2008 12:19 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In other news
The Denver Nuggets just got the option to “swap” 2nd Rounders with the Los Angeles Clippers so that they would take Marcus Camby’s salary off of their books.
These are the same Denver Nuggets who wouldn’t trade Linus Klieza & their 1st Round pick for Artest, but would later sell said pick (#20) for $3M.
It’s not as simple as just saying, “Let’s get a Top 100 player back” . . . especially when the player has a bad reputation league-wide.
In fact, I’d say that the Camby deal (and the Kurt Thomas & two 1’s deal last year) are proof positive that Salary Cap space is worth more than most players in regards to getting value in trade.
It shouldn’t matter if Petrie makes headlines with his returning package in any Artest trade, as long as it improves the chances of the Kings going forward. JT sure wasn’t a “sexy” pick, and most of us are already on board with it. I have zero problem saying that GP knows more about basketball than I ever will.
by smgmatt on
Jul 16, 2008 8:11 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And...
As Ive told you before Pookey, I actually understand YOUR argument on this one. There is no denying that you think it would be better if he were gone for both on/off the court reasons. That, I can see, and respect…Although I disagree, I gotta respect a man’s (there I go again with gender assumption!) reasons as long as he seems to understand the game and doesnt seem to base his reasoning on pure emotions!
by Hoops916 on
Jul 15, 2008 9:00 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Disagree - but good post
I disagree with you on a couple points. I love to beat a joke into the ground, so Section214’s joke is OK with me. Die, horse DIE! I also disagree that people are overreacting to Artest’s comments. His comments alone are not that big a deal, but taken together, with their frequency and contradictions, are really a problem.
What I liked about your post is that you’re able to disagree without being a jerk about it. Not everyone gets the message. I don’t necessarily agree, but good post anyway.
by Carl on
Jul 15, 2008 9:20 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
artest's complaints/letters/emails
seem to make more headlines than all of his trade rumors combined.
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 9:21 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why you gotta...
...hate on section214!
Just kidding by the way.
Wait....Why is everybody clapping? Everyone around me is clapping.... I guess I should be clapping too... GO LAKERS!!! I hate living in So Cal
by 27freethrows on
Jul 15, 2008 12:05 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It was me, you don't party with the JJ without learning how to beer bong the hatorade.
Or maybe those crazy Maloof brothers stumbled upon StR. I want someone to make a StR t-shirt with a large picture of Ron with the title “Pass the Hatorade”. I would also like “True Asshole” shaved into his dome on the T. Can anyone make that happen?
Hot dogs, get your hot dogs.
by jjham15 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:37 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
right
but he’d have to misspell either “True” or “Asshole”. Or maybe both.
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 8:42 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Tru Assholl
Hot dogs, get your hot dogs.
by jjham15 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Brilliant!
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it's all about the dolla
tRu a$$holl
Mikki Moore in the skills challenge! - LPA
by iashwash on
Jul 15, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What I love about this is the irony
of Joe Maloof telling Ron to control his emotions and stop blabbing to the media.
This from the man who put up a billboard offering to mow Chris Webber’s lawn?
I also want to know, who did Ron talk to in the Nuggets organization, and when? Did someone recently question his commitment to basketball, or was this kind of a reaction to his whole rap career thing?
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 8:05 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I heard that
he talked to the Assistant Regional Manager. Or maybe it was the Assistant to the Regional Manager. Can’t be sure.
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 8:22 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Either way, he has his own bobblehead so he's really important.
Hot dogs, get your hot dogs.
by jjham15 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:31 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He read their blog ofcourse
That’s how he knows we are all h . . . dislikers here.
"Being loquacious and being right aren't necessarily always the same."
GP, the man, the myth, the legend, puts the smackdown on Reggie
by SavageBeast on
Jul 15, 2008 10:42 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Uhm
You don’t see the difference there??
I’ll agree, the Maloofs tend to run their mouths a bit, similar to Artest. But 99% of the time, they are doing it in support of their players/management (to an almost annoying degree at times).
What Artest is doing is undermining his own efforts to get out of Sacramento AND he’s probably costing himself money or years on his next contract. Someone needs to duct tape the guy to a chair for about a month.
Kevin Pritchard has Chuck Norris tied up in the trunk of his car.
by otis29 on
Jul 15, 2008 8:53 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I do see the difference
between showing love for one of your players and e-mailing ESPN every day with some new complaint. I just thought it was funny to hear a guy who has shown little restraint in the past telling a guy who has the impulse control of a two year old to be quiet. But I was on my way out the door, so I probably could have worded it better.
And I haven’t had breakfast yet. Blondes with low blood-sugar are notorious for posting incomplete thoughts.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 9:12 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Funny thing is
I think the Maloofs have a similar amount of mental firepower as Artest. Neither of these three should be in front of a microphone (or keyboard or cell phone) as much as they are. It’s embarassing I tell ya!
Kevin Pritchard has Chuck Norris tied up in the trunk of his car.
by otis29 on
Jul 15, 2008 9:29 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Like it or not
Its thier team.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 2:44 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Will you say the same
If they ship Artest to the Lakers?
Kevin Pritchard has Chuck Norris tied up in the trunk of his car.
by otis29 on
Jul 15, 2008 2:55 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nuggets not making the deal?
I wonder Ron’s opinion on the Nuggets is because he heard that George Karl blocked the deal. Remember that Artest sees himself on the level of Kobe and Chris Paul. Kleiza was basically a bench player and the Nuggets still wouldn’t do the trade. My guess is that Artest took it personally and that’s why he won’t go to the Nuggets.
by Carl on
Jul 15, 2008 9:26 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That was my guess as well
“You don’t think I’m worth Linus and 3mil(what they sold the pick for)? F-you!”
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on
Jul 15, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Quick Question
Right off the bat I have to throw out that I know very little about this, but would Artest contacting Denver directly when he is under contract with the Kings be considered tampering? I’m going out on a limb that they didn’t contact him, but I imagine that would raise some issues.
I always assumed that the Kings have to grant permission before agents start seeking trades. And Artest is an agent….
by Kingsfan banished to AZ on
Jul 15, 2008 8:26 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Why this is bad
Artest’s comments the other day were good in the sense that they forced Petrie’s hand. Geoff can no longer afford to mull trade offers over the next six months.
Joe Maloof’s comments make for a great conversation, but they are a mistake. By going to the media, you’re provoking him to either up the ante or back down. You cannot control Ron Artest, so there is a very good chance that Artest says something even crazier tomorrow. I don’t think Artest’s original comments hurt his trade value, as they were mostly an elaboration on what he’s said in the past. But it’s almost unprecedented for the Maloofs to publicly chastise a player. This comment hurts Artest’s trade value. If Joe Maloof provokes Artest into another comment, he’s seriously damaging the Kings ability to trade the guy.
There is one correct response to Ron Artest’s constant stream of comments. Trade his ass. NOW, before it gets worse.
by Carl on
Jul 15, 2008 9:39 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
"Geoff can no longer afford to mull trade offers over the next six months."
Sure he can. Geoff Petrie will do what Geoff Petrie wants to do, not what a few dozen bloggers think he should do.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 15, 2008 11:51 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe we can trade Carl to the Lakers
NOW, before it gets worse.
Just kidding, but you have been beating a dead, dead horse for some time now.
I do agree that Joe Maloof really shouldn’t be given anyone media relations advice. He’s the guy who really started this ball rolling when he said Ron was great and that if Ron didn’t opt out, there was a good chance for him to get a long-term deal. Now he thinks Ron should shut up. Sweet, but it comes off as one of those “Do as I say, not as I do” things.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 15, 2008 11:55 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not so sure
So, because Artest didn’t get an extension offer at 12:01 after opting out, Joe Maloof somehow mislead/deceived everyone with his comment that there was a good chance that Artest would get a long-term deal in Sacramento?
I heard those comments on Jim Rome’s show, and it sounded to me like they would look at re-signing him “after” his contract was up, but that if he opted out, he wasn’t in their plans (read: budget) this off-season.
I also haven’t heard Joe back down on his praise of Artest either, unless I missed something.
by smgmatt on
Jul 16, 2008 8:18 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
WallyWorld
As has been said above, and as I mentioned in my ‘Ron Artest East’ post. Wally gives us a trade piece, a pick (LA doesn’t have one to give) and doesn’t get in the way of our other young PFs we hope will develop.
The SMarion (who I hate!) trade also does many of the same things with the added chance that we get a prospective young player as well.
I appreciate the subtle and not so subtle abuse I got from that post though,
reminds me of my first marraige.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 9:46 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Backpedal?
I honestly didn’t see Miami or Cleveland taking K9’s contract in exchange for an Expiring Contract of their own, so to add a draft pick in those cases seemed ludicrous to me.
That said, after reading some of the rumors (for whatever they’re worth), I’ve changed my stance in that I think that Cleveland just might take K9 and give up a pick for the chance that Artest elevates them.
In addition, I think that Miami might also take back K9 in a Marion deal, although I still don’t see them giving up a pick in the process, since this is closer to the Odom deal (getting a “name” player back).
As I’ve said before, if the best offer is in the East, that would be ideal (definitely better draft picks in general). If it is not, however, I still think you take the best deal for your franchise, and let the chips fall where they may elsewhere.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 10:04 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wally
I may have said the same thing in the other thread, but Wally just gets in the way. I like the idea of getting a first round pick, but with Salmons and Garcia already on the team, Wally creates a logjam at small forward. He does it without adding anything the team doesn’t already have.
I suppose what I like about Odom is that he rebounds, which the Kings desperately need, and he fits the Kings offensive style in that he’s a passer. He’s also better than anyone the team already has it his position, and he frees up time for John Salmons (or Garcia) to start. Of course, Odom also creates logjam issues and squashes minutes of the young guys.
At this point, I’m not going to complain. I just want Artest gone.
by Carl on
Jul 15, 2008 10:07 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cutting Wally is a feasible option Carl
It also opens up a roster spot for a greater need at this point: Backup PG.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 10:15 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Solution to your "problem"
Trade Salmons for a decent backup point guard.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 15, 2008 11:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Attn: Maloofs
Consider this idea:
Get rid of the Nancy-boy Artest and K9 for Lamar Odum. This will free up ONE spot for our local kid; David Johnson. I’d rather root for him any day. I do NOT want someone who doesn’t want to be here & neither does the rest of our fans and/or viewers.
I hope Ron isn’t the type to sabotage the team that he is playing for because he knows that it won’t be HIS team for long. To add to that, our ticket sales are extremely low and this Johnson kid alone could put people back in the stands…the difference a local could bring.
...Something to ponder.
by Kings 4 Lyfe on
Jul 15, 2008 10:08 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Johnson has to earn his way
I would like to have seen Johnson invited to Summer League and training camp, but he’s got to earn his way onto the team. No one is going to give him anything.
by Carl on
Jul 15, 2008 10:10 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
remember
that Webber didn’t want to play here initially either. Let’s face it, would you want to play in Sacramento if you could play in New York, Miami, etc.?
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And we've got yet another spelling of Odom's name
Not picking on you individually K4L, just noticing that we’ve seen a few misspellings of Odom’s name already on here from several posters. In addition to Odem and Odum, I’m looking forward to some fun misspelling nicknames if we acquire him. Personally, I’m hoping Odam becomes popular, because then if he throws down a big dunk or something, we’ll be able to shout “Odam? Oh-Damn!”
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on
Jul 15, 2008 10:57 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
I like that better than
what I was thinking – Odumb.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on
Jul 15, 2008 2:40 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cleveland needs to win NOW
Danny Ferry is up late at nights thinking how he’s going to lose the best player in the league (my opinion) in 2010. LaBron could play the 2 on offense and Artest can guard most 2s.
As for a ‘logjam’ at the 3 with Salmons and Garcia, its better than four 4s. They both have some versatility/play the 2 a lot – and Wally would get us Something additional at the trade deadline. (not much probably)
Let me say again.
1)The lakers can’t give us a good pick (no 1s left for two years) and won’t give us Farmar.
So what do we get? A rent-a-player who gets us a few more wins and the possibility
of some trade value? How about a pick now from Cleveland or some other team and
possibly a pick when we trade Wally/Marion? Isn’t that more return for our buck?
2) The Lakers are going to be better than us next year anyway BUT a lot of the fans will
count every win with Artest as if it were a ‘new’ win because of him.
THAT is demoralizing to the franchise at a very bad time
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 11:18 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Wait a minute
So do you think it would be a good idea to trade Artest to the East?
:)
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on
Jul 15, 2008 11:23 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow
Why hasn’t he said so earlier? And ALL IN CAPS SO WE REALLY KNOW HE MEANS IT.
JK, LttG. I can understand why you want to trade Artest to the East. But there’s gotta be something better than Wally.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 11:44 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay I'll bite
Chicago Milwaukee Indiana Cleveland and Detroit make up the Central. Of those teams which makes the most sense? Cleveland would be my answer.
Atlanta, Orlando, Charlotte, Washington and Miami are the Southeast Division. Washington has Caron Butler. Do you think the Wiz favor Artest over Butler? What about the Bobcats? Why would the Kings want Gerald Wallace whose injury prone and has 5 years and 50 million left on his contract? No thanks. (I don’t see them trading Felton either.) Orlando? I don’t see them wanting to deal with Ron-Ron’s mercurial attitude. They like choir boys around those parts. Miami? Is Shawn Marion more valuable than Lamar Odom, and does no draft pick but a year of Marion more enticing? Not to me.
In the NorthEast Division you have New York, New Jersey, Boston, Philadelphia and Toronto. You can eliminate Boston. Why would they want Artest over PIerce at this point? Philadelphia has Igoudala, but I don’t see the point of trading Iggy for Artest. I doubt Philly would either. New Jersey just traded Richard Jefferson. Why would they want Artest? New York might want Artest, but what expiring contract do they have the size of Wally’s that will allow them to take K9/Ron plus give up a 1st round pick too? I don’t see Donnie Walsh wanting to do that. Toronto already has Bargnani, Bosh, Jamario Moon too. Artest could fit there, but I’m failing to see where the big expiring deal for the Kings comes in.
You can say Wally isn’t enticing, and it isn’t a sexy deal by any stretch of any imagination, but for what the Kings need it’s the best possible deal of all existing at this point. Welcome to the world of dealing for Ron Artest my dear.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 11:54 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Another thing
I can understand why you want to trade Artest to the East. But there’s gotta be something better than Wally.Yeah, like what? Dwight Howard?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But I'm not tied to trading him East
So when I say there’s gotta be something better than Wally, I’m not saying just in the Eastern Conference. Not a fan of aging prettyboy sharpshooters with bad backs.
I’m not being unrealistic. Just picky. I want more than expirings and picks for Artest.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good luck
You are being unrealistic. NBA GM’s don’t trade up & coming superstars for mercurial talents like Ron Artest. If you think that’s so you’re smoking something incredible, and I want to know what. I want to smoke it too.
That being said this isn’t about trading Artest West vs East. I think Cleveland has the best combination of asset’s that I think help move the franchise forward.
That being said, for somebody who thinks there is a better trade than an expiring contract for K9/Artest and a draft pick, you come up with something better than.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:24 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I like the Odom deal, personally.
My second choice would be a deal with the Mavs involving Josh Howard.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 12:31 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the Odom deal is fairly dumb but I think the Marion deal is worse
I like any Mavs deal that allows the Kings to take K9 off the books and get Josh Howard back. But doing that will take some creative financing. So who knows. I still prefer Wally over Josh Howard myself, but I’m willing to take Howard as the backdrop to that.
Marion forget it. That guy is so overrated and overblown he may as well stay wherever he is. His market position is similar to Corey Maggette’s. only the Warriors were dumb enough to give that guy 50 million.
Odom? I see it, but I don’t agree with it. I especially don’t understand how dealing Odom at some point in mid-season nets you anything worthwhile. You may end up getting a similar type deal like Wally Szczerbiak and a 1st round pick anyway.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:36 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But if Odom fits
And we can re-sign him for a reasonable contract, it ends up being a good trade. If not, we trade him for picks, let him walk, or S&T him at the end of the season.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 12:42 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think this is a good point
Pookey, you mention ending up with the Wally/Pick deal anyway like it’s a bad thing. If that was still on the table for Odom then we could shop him/audition him and if it didn’t work out we’d still have the option to get the pick from Cleveland.
Seems like a possible win-win to me.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Odom doesn't work for them like Artest would
He’s not a low post player, and they don’t need another tweener F who can handle the ball and create for players off the dribble. If anything he duplicates what LeBron already does to an extent. What they need is a banging physical swing F who can play in the block and defend players so LeBron doesn’t have to. Why would the Lakers want to deal Ron Artest to Cleveland if the Kings have Lamar Odom?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Whoops, misunderstanding
Why would the Lakers want to deal Ron Artest to Cleveland if the Kings have Lamar Odom?
I was suggesting that the Kings could trade Odom to Cleveland, and while he may not be the ideal player for them, I think they’d take a chance on him over Wally Z, and since it would be a 1-for-1 (plus a pick) they’re not really risking much to improve their team for a playoff run.
Just don’t mention Odom’s recent playoff performances, ok?
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 1:01 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't
I don’t see how Odom fits in anything Cleveland is looking to do. That’s not a knock on Odom, but the reality of the situation that the Cavs are in. Artest fits in with their style, and Odom really doesn’t.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 1:05 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I mentioned
That Cleveland is already 10 mil over the Cap. If they re-signed Artest for say $12 mil (extension) and let Kenny T and one of thier other contracts expire they’d be at or under the cap in 2010.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 1:10 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They are going to be so far under the cap in 2010 it aint funny
They will have probably in upwards of 20 million in cap room. Not only does Ben Wallace expire, but so does Zydrunas Ilgauskas, This of course doesn’t mention that LeBron opts out too which will create more cap space if he leaves. Cleveland has a chance to do just about anything it wants.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 1:14 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Which is why
An Artest deal may make sense to them.
Though they’ll need to re-sign Z or some Center.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 1:17 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If If
How about something up front?
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 12:54 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good Luck with that
I mean seriously. Besides paying Odom 10 million a year, or whatever he agrees on, to be the 3rd or 4th best player on a team not even probably capable of winning 50 games until a minimum of 2 years down the road seems to me a lateral move at the very best.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
are we willing
to throw in a pick if we get Howard, and lose k9?
by misterbrister on
Jul 15, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
pookeyguru We agree
On a lot of things.
We hate Marion.
We’d rather not see Artest help a rival.
Two attractive things about Cleveland and Miami. Both give us a good expiring contract that could clear K-9 off the books. Both could give us a young player and/or a pick Now and we could potentially get another pick or prospect at the dealine.
The laker deal only gets us the ‘hope’ we could get something good at the deadline.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't want to speak for Pookey, but....
I don’t think he’s against the Lakers deal because he’d “rather not see Artest help a rival”, I think he’s against it because there is no draft pick involved, while there it one in the proposed Cleveland deal.
Whether or not he cares about the Lakers getting better (I don’t think any of us particularly want that), he’s doing what many have suggested the entire time: hoping for the best deal possible. In his case, the Cleveland deal is better than the LA deal.
Personally, I’m not sure which I prefer, as I see risk & benefits in both, but I am not factoring in my feelings about the Lakers at all, just what most improves the future of the Kings.
Anyways, sorry if I put any words in your mouth, Pookey.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 12:49 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Discussion bringing this stuff out is what I'm after
You’re not insulting me with a mis-interpretation. In fact it just leads to more discussion. (Even if it’s clarification. LOL)
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:54 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Its getting something now
Like a pick or prospect that is also my priority (well tied) motivation.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Expiring contract for K-9
Thats what you get, plus a pick and maybe a young prospect. I doubt anything more is out there.
Unless there’s magic in the air somewhere. ‘Funny’ on the CAPS comment. Just trying to get SOMEBODY to discuss the point that making a division rival better is a bad idea – especially when the long term return is negligible/doubtful.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 12:47 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I always believe
There’s magic in the air.
It’s what makes me so… fun.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 12:52 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Artest and K9 for Marion?
This in the Sac Bee:
“Miami is believed to have interest in Artest and be willing to part with Shawn Marion, whose $17.1 million deal also is expiring. As will be the case with most suitors, the question will be whether the Kings can include forward Kenny Thomas and his deal that includes two more seasons and approximately $18 million.”
I think this is a better deal than the Odom deal.
by KingsFan on
Jul 15, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
If we trade Artest for Marion
I’ll have to change my signature line.
Anybody know how to spell the sound of fingernails on a blackboard?
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 11:45 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Screeeeeeeeeeeee!!!
That’s how I’d do it, though maybe 4 exclamation points would be better.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on
Jul 15, 2008 2:45 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't get it
Why does Miami do this? Marion is expiring and Artest is a big risk. Is it just that Marion is such a locker room cancer that they’ll do anything to get rid of him?
by Carl on
Jul 15, 2008 11:48 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
might be a couple things
could be that beasley’s arrival makes marion more expendable. they might also believe wade, shaq, and riles could combine to control artest.
if artest behaved himself in miami, his infusion into their roster (coupled with a healthy wade, of course) would be a pretty nice boost to a team that is only a couple years removed from a title. dunno if any of this is actually true, but i’m trying to answer the question…
by sactoreg on
Jul 15, 2008 12:17 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
shaq and riley?
not there any more… well riley is, but he wont be the coach
by Toddy on
Jul 15, 2008 12:18 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Bigger problemw ith that
Is that it means the Kings take on more salary, and if they sign only Singletary (probably won’t bother with Ewing with Marion around) than that means they’re very nearly the luxury tax, and probably creep over it. I don’t see the Maloof’s willing to deal away the tax payment because they want to get the best player possible.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 11:55 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Simple fix?
Marion for Artest, K9, & Moore
Keeps the Kings out of Luxury Tax territory, and I’m sure Miami wouldn’t cry about getting an energy guy for their bench, especially if they’re trying to make a run this year.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 12:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I like that
I think it fits into the 125%, K-9 and MM are both off the books (mm by Jan next year)
I’d like a pick or young prospect though
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 1:00 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't know
With Moore included, GP might be able to get something extra, although I don’t know if he could get a 1st rounder. A 2nd rounder? No problem! A prospect? Debatable.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 1:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
MM is a solid NBA player
A bench player – but really at a decent price. Riley may also feel he needs to start winning now as Wade can also opt out in 2010.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 1:14 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How close are the Kings to the Lux tax?
The difference between Marion and Ron + K9 is less than 2 mil. Petrie could throw in Douby and that would make it about even.
by KingsFan on
Jul 15, 2008 1:21 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or Shelden
From what Pookey was saying, the Kings are about $775k under the Luxury Tax, and according to ShamSports the difference in salaries is just about $2M.
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 1:35 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's only if they sign Ewing & Singletary
That being said they’re @ 69.5 mil, and the luxury tax is like 71.25 mil or something like that (i forget the exact figure but it’s close to that).
Marion for Artest/Thomas doesn’t work really unless more salaries are added I suspect. That will make that deal more & more complicated.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 1:49 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Question
Whether or not they sign Ewing & Singletary or two other guys (to fill those roster spots), isn’t it safe to say that money is already accounted for one way or another?
by smgmatt on
Jul 15, 2008 7:58 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah it's safe to say they do have everything accounted for
The expiring contract is a huge deal to this team, and if they don’t have to go out and get a backup PG because they think Singletary will do the job, that will just save the team money long term (I’m not against that if Singletary is believed to be capable—it’s just very hard to say at this time).
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 9:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Miami Make a Run?
If Miami can make a run coming off the season they did, it shouldn’t be a strecth to believe the Kings can do the same thing. I mean, Miami would only have to win, what, 30-35 games more than they last season to make the playoffs? Piece of cake.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 16, 2008 12:02 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yup
That’s what the #2 overall pick can do for you . . . but no matter how you lose it’s still TANKING, right?
by smgmatt on
Jul 16, 2008 8:19 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's probably a reach
It’s going take Beasley a while to become a force in the league. I don’t think they had any Ron Artests in the Big 12 last year. Hell, Jason Thompason even outplayed him.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 16, 2008 7:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ditto
It’s no more of a reach than comparing Miami’s turnaround to Sacramento’s.
Miami traded the artist formerly known as Shaq for Marion, and picked up one of the two best players available in the draft.
Sacramento couldn’t pry Linus Klieza from Denver for one of their two best players.
The real irony here is if Miami turns around and trades Marion for Artest & K9 . . . because that would mean that Marion is worth less than Artest (taking on K9’s salary) who is worth less than Linus Klieza.
Shaq < Marion < Artest < Klieza!
This Linus guy must be really good! (I’m kidding, of course.)
by smgmatt on
Jul 16, 2008 9:02 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Mavs fan here
Just in wake of whats going on with you guys and Artest, the Mavericks have a great amount of interest in him also, but from your side of it, we cant really offer anything inticing realistically other than Josh Howard… which Mavs sources have said is NOT on the trading block.
But needless to say, a couple of the Insiders for the Mavericks wrote up an article on why it might be good for both teams, breaks down what is going to happen if he IS traded (probably not just to the Mavs, but anyone else, like a contract extension) and what the Mavs could realistically offer. Pookeyguru has visited us before with this over at mavsmoneyball.com, but I’d like to get some more of your guys opinions on if what these Mavs insiders said is even something you see the Maloofs and co. realistically doing.
by Toddy on
Jul 15, 2008 12:16 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
So..
What you got in mind? Glad to have some outside opinions here welcome
by LivesInSac on
Jul 15, 2008 12:23 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well the thing is
from what these guys said here, that anywhere Artest goes, he is more than likely going to want a max extension… which is for about 6 years. Which in any team he goes to, is a pretty big risk given his history. If it were just for a this next year, and he were playing for next years contract, a team might be more willing to bite.
I personally dont think that what we would offer (expiring stack/Jet/Bass for Artest and Rahim) is something that entices you guys enough to pull the plug on this deal… Here are the other deals that we could do…
REGARDING THE PARTICULARS OF A DEAL
There are numerous ways to mix-and-match the parts on both sides. Here are some general concepts (created by DB.com, not from conversations with NBA voices) that the Mavs might be considering:
IDEA 1. To match Artest alone, we see three options. ...
a. STACKHOUSE. Stackhouse-for-Artest is almost an exact match salary-wise, and both are expiring contracts. We don’t see much upside for Sacto here.
b. JONES, GEORGE AND MAGLOIRE … PLUS. Artest can also be salary-matched for trade purposes with expiring contracts by combining Eddie Jones ($1.977 mil) plus sign-and-trades with 20-percent-or-less raises for Devean George ($2.843 mil or less) and Jamaal Magloire ($1.241 mil or less). Add Bass on his minimum-salary deal and the total is very close to Artest’s. In this proposal, the Kings are at least adding a commodity in a young rotation player.
c. JET OR J-HO. Jason Terry’s contract would be allowable as a one-for-one but Josh Howard’s wouldn’t.
(By the way: Bass is a minimum salary so can be dropped into any deal without a match being needed.)
IDEA 2. To match Artest-plus-Thomas or Artest-plus-Sharif. …
a. The Mavs could package together two of the above sets (1a, 1b or 1c) to make a salary match, if they could agree with Sacramento on the right amount of talent (or contract-eating) to offer.
b. While Sacramento obviously wants all they can get for Artest, eating one of those nasty contracts has reportedly been the Kings’ asking price. In also adding talent (Jet, J-Ho, or Bass) the Mavs may feel they are overpaying.
c. Talent-wise, the Mavs most advantageous “eat-a-contract” offer in our opinion would be a package of Stackhouse, Jones, George, and Magloire for Artest-plus-a-contract. We’d offer that last idea, and the issue left to negotiate with the Kings would be which of those two nasty contracts (Thomas’ bigger one or Sharif’s smaller one) Dallas will be swallowing. If the Kings want talent, too, inquiries need to be made about having the Kings include Francisco Garcia (who has talent but is buried on the depth chart behind Kings’ star Kevin Martin and who is currently seeking a high-dollar extension from his rookie contract). Including him could save the Kings from being forced into a sizable raise for a backup, and might also finally solve the Mavs’ annual quest for a taller 2-guard. (He wouldn’t be a workable candidate for an extend-and-trade, too, because of “poison pill” provisions in the CBA that his expected extension would trigger, so the Mavs would have to work any extension with him AFTER a trade and not beforehand.)
by Toddy on
Jul 15, 2008 12:28 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
We don't have the roster spots for some 1 for 3 deal
and the last thing we need is more dead weight.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 12:34 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A couple of notes on that article
First, KMart already has his extension.
Second, the “cancer in the locker room” thing might be overblown. His teammates in Sacramento all seem to love him. The biggest issue is that he doesn’t respect Theus, but if he respects Carlisle, Artest would be fine in that situation.
Third, I’d be really surprised if we deal Artest just for expirings. He is an expiring. Plus we don’t have the roster spots for your proposed Stackhouse, Jones, George, Magloire, and Bass trade.
Fourth, getting the Kings to package Garcia in this trade is going to be a really hard sell. He’s Theus’s boy.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 12:38 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Where was Kmart mentioned?
Because all I saw the whole article was about Artest.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:41 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe
It wasn’t really clear, and he referenced Garcia and his contract situation later in the article, so I made an assumption.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah they did say that
But I think they were talking about Franky G and not Kmart. (He got his extension a year ago as we all know.)
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:43 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I didnt think so
about you guys dealing Garcia…
you bring up good points though. I think this guys angle on the expiring contracts, was that you guys could get a guy like Bass and Terry with out taking on long term baggage (even though JETs contract is), and rid your self of a bad contract (thomas or Rahim) and a player who would like to leave (artest).
by Toddy on
Jul 15, 2008 12:41 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Kings have no interest in Jason Terry presumably
He has 3 years left on his current deal. What’s so attractive about that?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
JET
nothing… but to a certain degree, I think that the Mavs dealing Jho right now would have them feeling that they are selling him too low.
Which is why any deal they do, they will try and move him first. Its not exactly ideal for you guys, I agree, which is why I personally dont see a deal happening, unless its some sort of Kenny Thomas and Artest for Jet, Bass and Stack
by Toddy on
Jul 15, 2008 12:57 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Forget that
The Kings are trying to shed a crappy contract in K9, and they get a worse one in Jason Terry in return? Toddy, you do realize that’s not exactly a type of move they’re looking to do right?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 1:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah
thats why I dont see a deal being done with the two teams. I put myself in your shoes, and also wouldnt want Terry’s contract.
I only ask what you guys thought of those proposed deals that db.com did above. I mean there are guys (as there is with any fan base) thinking that we can send you guys all our spare parts for Artest, because he is this huge caner, problem, whatever. I dont think that is the case or issue within the Kings organization (as of now at least), but just wondered if those deals above were anything that you could see the Maloofs pulling a deal on… not necessarily what YOU would do, but rather if you could see the Kings FO doing.
For example, I would have never have done the Kidd deal we did, but I always knew that Mark had it in him to do a deal like that. For the A’s fans out there, half the guys the A’s trade away, a fan base would never do, but the owners WOULD and do those type of bad trades (depending on your view of them)
by Toddy on
Jul 15, 2008 1:22 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No I don't see that at all actually
The Maloof’s I don’t see being that interested in Terry just having re-signed Beno Udrih to the deal he just signed. I consider that a somewhat duplication of talents. So, to answer your question. my opinion aside, I don’t see that deal being done from the Kings perspective either.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 1:51 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If you don't obsess on the contract
Jason Terry is a helluva talent who can back up both Kmart and Beno. Frankly, he could start instead of Beno, but that sixth man role might be good for him. Now, if we could get him and hang onto Artest ,maybe we would have something.
by coolcatreportdotcom on
Jul 16, 2008 12:07 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No obsessing intended
But $28 million over three years is too much for Jason Terry.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on
Jul 16, 2008 7:27 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We'd definitely have something
Something like a Luxury Tax team that might not even get into the playoffs.
by smgmatt on
Jul 16, 2008 8:21 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're looking at dealing Ron for expiring's the wrong way
It’s not just Ron but KENNY THOMAS. Surely you understand the value of jetting the doggylicious one away.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:46 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I do see the benefit
But as I said above, I’m picky.
And we still don’t have the roster spots for all those guys.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 12:48 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't touch Garcia
I think he’s off the table unless something reeeally good would be coming back
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You aren't trading LeBron James
You don’t have the luxury of being picky. Patient in what deal you prefer to emerge for Ron if you’re Geoff, but being picky, there is no effing way.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Picky, patient
Potato, Po-TAH-to
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 12:54 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
While that's funny you're wrong too
defintion of picky: meticilous or fussy
definition of patient: (1) Enduring pain or difficulty with calmness
(2) Tolerant or understanding
(3) Perserving or constant
(4) Capable of calmly awaiting an outcome; not hasty or impulsive
Sounds to me you’re looking for things you care about as opposed to things I care about. As far as I can tell that only makes you one thing. Wrong Wrong Wrong!
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 1:02 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Funny
Sounds to me you’re looking for things you care about as opposed to things I care about. As far as I can tell that only makes you one thing. Wrong Wrong Wrong!
Right back at ya!
Because I’m always right. You’ll get used to it. Ask SB.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 1:35 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't have SB's problem
I don’t have to concede anything to you. For any reason. At any time. So there!
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 1:52 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not sure SB wants you referring to it as a "problem"
Mikki Moore in the skills challenge! - LPA
by iashwash on
Jul 15, 2008 2:45 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's SB's problem not mine teehee
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 2:50 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yep
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 12:51 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
anyone else realize the ramifications
of pairing JHo with BMills? Especially considering Brad is such a good passer? What’s going to happen when Douby’s in the mix?
Mikki Moore in the skills challenge! - LPA
by iashwash on
Jul 15, 2008 12:53 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
well
they thought the same would happen when he paired up with kidd… and well it didnt
by Toddy on
Jul 15, 2008 12:54 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Psst, Toddy
(It was a reference to Brad Miller’s 5 game suspension for, presumably, marijuana, and Josh Howard’s suspension for the same reason, with play on Quincy Douby’s name just for fun.)
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 12:58 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
haha
my bad… I actually just picked up on that right as I wrote that, but was hoping you wouldnt say anything.
by Toddy on
Jul 15, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
haha
for a second there, you had me thinking Kidd was busted for marijuana use.
Mikki Moore in the skills challenge! - LPA
by iashwash on
Jul 15, 2008 1:02 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
dont put it past him
I dont trust him beating his wife all those times with a level head! LOL
by Toddy on
Jul 15, 2008 1:23 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Booze...
Booze makes you hit people. Weed makes you eat snacks. You never saw Scooby and Shaggy smacking people. Your honor, I rest my case.
by Carl on
Jul 15, 2008 1:49 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Two scooby shnacks?
rwall rwight!
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on
Jul 15, 2008 2:54 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good luck
was hoping you wouldnt say anything.
Around here, somebody’s always going to say something.
TickTickTickTickTickTick
by LeaguePassAddict on
Jul 15, 2008 1:44 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
says the person doing her fair share of the saying.
I’m just saying…
Mikki Moore in the skills challenge! - LPA
by iashwash on
Jul 15, 2008 2:46 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Stackhouse, Jones, George, and Magloire - Non-starter
That deal is a total non-starter. The Kings aren’t going to use Artest strictly to facilitate a salary dump. They’d have to cut at least two of those players to begin with. It’s just not realistic. The only player the Kings would be interested in (aside from Dirk) is Josh Howard.
by Carl on
Jul 15, 2008 1:45 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You can't even do That
You have to already have the roster spots in hand.
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 2:47 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not positive
but I think it’s ok to go over 15 in the off season. You just need to get down to 15 by a certain point just prior to the start of the regular season. Think training camp rosters.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on
Jul 15, 2008 2:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
whoops
maybe I should read the the article first facebash
by LivesInSac on
Jul 15, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Toddy thanks for posting this
It’s an excellent insight into some problems trading for Artest including wanting the extension part which will scare teams away. But at the same Artest has no negotiating power, and any team in their right mind would want to wait. Artest is not Kevin Garnett after all.
Would I want Josh Howard? Well, I guess if held over a barrel. Over Marion or Odom? Absolutely. Especially if you aren’t enticed by keeping Salmons as your fulltime SF for a season.
Now do I think the Mavs are a first resort type of option? Nope I don’t. I think a team like Cleveland could trump the offer if they take Kenny Thomas which is a huge negotiation bargaining point. If Dallas is willing to do that it’s hard to imagine not having some sway in these discussions. So let me offer you a counter idea.
Josh Howard, and Devean George in a S&T for Ron Artest/Kenny Thomas. George is an expiring contract that you could have a team option to void after a single season (creating the expiring contract-you can only create a 3 year s&t deal hence the team option after the 1st year-basically what happened with KVH). If Dallas does that, and George agrees to it, I can see the Kings going to that option at some point. Assuming there isn’t something they want more.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:33 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
George
you guys would want him for 7+ million a year? Because thats what I think we would have to sign and trade him for in order to do J-Ho and him for Artest and Thomas. Is that right?
by Toddy on
Jul 15, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nah
More like 5 million or something.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:38 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it means saving seven million by paying him seven million
So be it.
Mikki Moore in the skills challenge! - LPA
by iashwash on
Jul 15, 2008 12:49 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think
If we had committed to Ron he would fully deliver on the court. except after 2 years everyone seems to be tired of his antics. The Maloofs know what kinda guy Ron is and they can’t handle it. They seem to be looking for role models in our NBA basketball players which everyone should know by now they are not. here is article i don’t know if you guys caught it http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/sports/kings/archives/013864.html I’d really like to see something happen with Ron soon his stock is as high as its gonna get.
by LivesInSac on
Jul 15, 2008 12:28 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You mean
Like he fully delivered on the court last year for 57 games?
And I don’t think the Kings are necessarily looking for role models, but they don’t want too many knuckleheads either.
Kevin Pritchard has Chuck Norris tied up in the trunk of his car.
by otis29 on
Jul 15, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Howard isn't a knucklehead--other than he's a borderline all-star that's the best thing about him
He takes being in the NBA seriously.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 12:52 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Howard not worth the $$ (16 mil?)
What you see is what he’s gonna be i think
eternal skeptical optimist
by lietothegirls on
Jul 15, 2008 1:03 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd also add...
...that character shouldn’t be totally discounted in building a franchise. I’m pretty impressed with the transformation in Portland.
A lonely Kings fan in a sea of gold and purple...
by Jaycee on
Jul 15, 2008 10:12 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Awesome thread!
How do I “rec” the whole thing? Thanks for the read, gang.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on
Jul 15, 2008 7:39 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Our gift to you
We shine so you can take the day off. :)
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on
Jul 15, 2008 9:57 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs














