Who are we really better than?
So the experts have predicted for the last 3 months that we are the worst in the West if not the entire league. Their points are: we were the worst last year; our best player isn't a star; we have too many young players no talented veterans; our coach was chosen because he was the cheapest not because he was the best.
These points are all true to an extent. But there are some points not considered that all of us posters are more that happy to point out. They are as follows: we have no place to go but up; Kevin was injured and has never been the real go-to-guy; the veterans were who really led us into the hole last year and our young players have only improved; Westphal has experience, perspective, and hopefully a chip on his shoulder after being in the background for so long.
All valid points. But another way of looking at this is to take a serious hard look at some of the other teams we have the misfortune of competing with for worst in the league. Because I need to be negative, but not about the Kings, as i usually am.
So let's discuss this. First, i think we are much less disfunctional than several of our fellow bottom-dwellers, especially after the movement of some unhappy and sometimes insane (Ron-Ron) veterans.
For example, Golden State. Their strategy has been to mismanage their own players while trying to win games by confusing the other team. I am all for the apositionality movement; i just don't think Nellie should be leading it. Too many lessons not learned. Meanwhile, their Captain has mutinied, their young star crashes mopeds, their most consistent player is Corey Maggete. They have ran out of town the veterans who contributed to their most recent winning season, and the front office has more internal struggles than the coach and players. They are arguably more talented than us, but they have no idea what to do with it. I could see a worse season from them than us. Especially considering we are at least trying to play defense and rebound.
Minnesota has the injury swine flu- a front line of Jefferson and Love would be intriguing, but neither has been able to stay on the court with the other, and both are currently battling injuries already. They traded away their perimeter scorers, picked someone in the draft who was not only unproven but also a prima donna, and the other draft pick, while a solid player and person, is playing the hardest position in the game. Also, it is freaking cold in Minnesota. Unless Love and Jefferson both play 70 games, they are likely to have a worse record than us.
Memphis. Ha! At least the Warriors admit their disfunction. They have at least 3 players who want 25 shots a game and the ball in their hands constantly. AI is not a bad guy, and a future HOF, but this was another bad decision by him. Not that he had much choice. Z-Bo will take time and money from other more deserving talents, Gay will sulk, Conley will wish he was the one in Houston and not Lowry, and the owner will trade away one of his young talents to a better team for money. If they actually played hard, they could be in the playoffs. But they won't. Practice? You wanna talk about practice? I think the younger Gasol will be the only good, consistent performer. They may not end up worse then us, but they won't be that much better.
Other teams that might end up worse in the West if some really bad things happen are: Phoenix, who are a Nash or Stoudemire injury away from losing 60 games; Houston, who plays well as a team, and hopefully that is enough because Morey might just have something new and interesting; the Clippers were almost as bad as us last year, and some people think Evans is better than Griffin, even if only on this site; OKC if Bones Durant gets hurt.
I didn't even touch on the East. But potential winners for worst are the Knicks, Detroit, NJ, Milwaukee. My bet is on NY and Detroit to end up with the worst in the East. I actually like Milwaukee, but they won't win much this year. NJ will be better than last year.
So, are we still planning on being worse? I don't care about John Wall. Besides, Stern wants him in NY. You just watch.
(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
1 recs |
56 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Couple things
The Jazz have the Knicks 1st round pick this year. Actually, that’s the only thing.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 23, 2009 1:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
sucks for them then
if the Jazz get a top 5 pick, who do you think they get?
by Ice_9ine on Oct 23, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Knicks will do everything in their power to get into the playoffs
So, I doubt it will be the case of a tank.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 23, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Depends what pick they get
But I wouldnt be surprised to see them try to package it with a bad contract like AKs for a nice star from a struggling team.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.
by Aykis16 on Oct 23, 2009 2:37 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know Aykis
Utah might conclude that having a big in a big heavy draft is EXACTLY what they need. It is cheaper, after all, to have a young impact talent than it is an expensive impact talent
When you factor in that the Jazz are paying over 12 million in luxury tax this season (effectively making their payroll near 94 million), it will make them wary of being a tax payer again I suspect.
If they can get an impact player (in their view) through the draft, I don’t see how they won’t go that route.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 23, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm calling this one now
If the Jazz get a top 5 pick from the Knicks they will take Cole Aldrich
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Oct 23, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again
Depends what pick they get. I could see them loving Favors or Davis, but if I were Utah I’d want Willie Warren. Jazz’s worst position is SG.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.
by Aykis16 on Oct 23, 2009 2:45 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Matter of POV I suspect
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 23, 2009 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Utah hasn't had a solid two since Hornaceck.
And he wasn’t that solid in his last two years. That’s a decade without a legit SG. They are going to have a few troubled spots to fill and this is a supreme big man draft but Warren and Williams would be an unbelievable backcourt for the next decade. I guess it’s a good position to be in.
No law when it comes to me.
I let you type critics write and I just keep it hood.
That will never change.
I am not kissing no ones ass because I'm in LA. Suck a cock.
-Ron Artest (e-mail exchange with Kyle Slavin)
by jjham15 on Oct 23, 2009 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd let Boozer walk and draft a big
Seriously.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 23, 2009 10:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
too early in the year to say
let’s see how he holds up this season (injury wise). Spend the time you have already purchased wisely.
by betweentheeyes on Oct 24, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
nice post
I think we’re better than GS, not more talented, but better.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Oct 23, 2009 1:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Easy answer
Everybody!
Grant Napier is a Ginger, he can't help it that he's annoying.
by Dastardly D on Oct 23, 2009 1:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Detroit?
You really think they’ll have a worse record than the Kings? I think Gordon and Villanueva were good pickups, but even if there are chemistry issues, I don’t see that team losing 55 games.
But a sensible write-up, by and large.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen.
by andy sims on Oct 23, 2009 1:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Villanueva is a chucker,
they have no center, no one to make plays for other people (aka no PG), Gordon plays for himself, Rip and Tayshaun are pissed and will stop playing D until one or both are traded for Boozer, and I dont think that will help at all.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Oct 23, 2009 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Charlie V is not good.
And I don’t just love Gordon either. Joe Dumars is going to need a whole lot of luck to not get blamed for a colossal roster cluster f*%$. I see a lot of system players who need legit bigs to cover their inadequacies and I don’t see any bigs that are capable of providing that help. Gordon and Villanueva are not system players but players who lack discipline and size for their respective positions. So I see role players and chuckers- no stars, no bigs and a coach without head coaching experience in John Kuester.
Boozer for Hamilton makes too much sense but only on paper. The Pistons need a time machine for old Ben Wallace to make this thing work.
Detroit might win 2 or 3 quick ones and garner some interest but I see this team as a giant mix of horribly over payed misfits that will struggle unless they are able to make a move to secure the post.
No law when it comes to me.
I let you type critics write and I just keep it hood.
That will never change.
I am not kissing no ones ass because I'm in LA. Suck a cock.
-Ron Artest (e-mail exchange with Kyle Slavin)
by jjham15 on Oct 23, 2009 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Charlie V and BG
Neither one of them would have had a contract like that from another team. BG can put on great shooting shows but he can have just as many stinkers. Villanova had a good rookie year but has not been able to put it together since. I dont think that Detroit will be the worst, but they will regret how they have their payroll right now.
by Hilton on Oct 25, 2009 8:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good read
I can see this team coming together and playing beyond expectations. Look at the last game.
On a good night we are definitely going to be better than quite a few other teams…
It is the bad nights I dread.
by MustangMBS on Oct 23, 2009 2:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My gang of nine
Nets, Bobcats, T-Wolves, Thunder, Grizzlies, Bucks, Warriors, Knicks, and the Clips (on talent, they don’t deserve to be on this list…but they’re the Clips!).
Half of these teams will head north and half will head south. I think that we will wind up somewhere around the 5th worst team in the league.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Oct 23, 2009 2:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Good call on Charlotte
I keep forgetting about them. Trading Okafor for Chandler was a big downgrade in my opinion, since Chandlers lack of offensive game will stand out without Chris Paul, Bell is out till the All-Star break, Wallace and Chandler will also most likely miss some time too. I could definitely see them being the worst team next year.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.
by Aykis16 on Oct 23, 2009 2:42 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Too much Emphasis on injuries
Yes some of the other teams are one key players injury away for hitting rock bottom. But, with Hawes knees and being our only center, and Kevin’s tooth picks for legs bad history over the last 2 year, the Kings are just as likely to hit the skids after a key injury.
Nellie is the acid that holds the team together. GW will win games just on their scoring alone. The same way that the Knicks did it last year, and will do this year again. The Clips are over the injury bug of last year and have the talent to be the most improved team this year.
We won’t lose to every Eastern team like we did last year, with the exception of the NY game. But, with the exception of Memphis, Minni, OKC, and maybe New Orleans, there aren’t many teams in the West that won’t have a better record then the Kings. My best guess is we’re a top 7 lottery team but not top 3.
I expect modest improvement from JT, Spencer, & Greene (who will have his option picked up). Tyreke will have a great year, as he improves the technic of his jumper. Omri will move into the starting rotation by mid season, but temper that with the fact of who he’s replacing. May will have a good but unspectacular year. Sergio who could be the player everyone wanted from the draft, will have a hard time getting PT behind Tyreke and PW’s insistance on playing Beno.
All in all, we will have a young improving team that will surprise some of the elite teams, but as a whole won’t win all the games that they should win. Rebounding will improve, but defense in general won’t be that much better. Individual defense by the guards and wings will improve , but the improvement by the front line will consist of more fouls and not much improvement in technic.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 23, 2009 2:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I really only expect Minny to have problems w/ injuries
Let me ask you this- who would you rather have as a coach on a young team? Don Nelson, Mike Dunleavy, or Paul Westphal? In what order would you rate them?
As a team, the Warriors have regressed, the Clips have improved. I really think the Clippers make the playoffs, but it wouldn’t be a shock if they didn’t.
New Orleans is an interesting team. They remind me now of the Miami Heat and Wade in that Chris Paul has to bring it (and he does) every night for them to have a chance. West is solid, Okafor is solid, but they haven’t really gotten better and may have regressed. If they have a rough time of it starting the season I would not be surprised if Scott was fired. I am not sure they will make the playoffs. I think they are still better than the Kings by 10 games at least.
I just don’t think we are going to finish with the worst record. Bottom 5 for sure. Not the worst.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Oct 23, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Paul Westphal
Forget the other 2. It’s almost embarrasing, looking back, that the Kings even considered Kurt Rambis. On the other hand, without that process, Paul Westphal would not look as good today.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 23, 2009 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It depends on the talent
All three coaches have good history, and you can’t discount Nellies win percentage, no matter how manipulative he is. If I had a roster like GW, Nellie would be my man. PW has said all the right things and seems to be doing what GP asked of him. (defense & rebounding) Whether player development will be a strong point in the PW regime is still to be proven.
Tyreke & Omri are what they are and their performance so far has been based on the talent they brought with them to the team. So, I give most of the credit to them and GP. How Spencer, JT & Greene develop will be the test of PW’s administration. That, and how team defense matures.
We are a bottom 10 ( or as I said top 10 lottery team) depending on how you want to look at it. I actually feel that we’ll end up in the 5 to 10 range so I chose 7. Definitely, we will not be in the bottom 3. Our final position will depend heavily on Spencer & JT. We just don’t have enough bigs and we don’t have the speed or shooters to run or outscore most teams.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 23, 2009 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, we are not fast and not the best shooting team
that makes playing tough D and getting transition baskets when the opportunity arises even more important. It will be discouraging to see the Kings get stops when they can’t score though. With that in mind, I sincerely believe that Evans can be a playmaker in those types of situations. The sooner the better.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Oct 23, 2009 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My ranking
1. Paul Westphal
2-30. Any of the cheerleaders
31 Don Nelson
32 Mike Dunleavy
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Oct 23, 2009 6:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
lets redo that
and add Kayte as an option? if it is between her and Westphal, who do you go with as coach?
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Oct 23, 2009 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to see Kayte doing sideline commentary with Grant and JR
And with her in place there will never be any reason whatsoever for the camera to be on Peaches, even (and especially) when he’s talking.
by hozr on Oct 23, 2009 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed lets just have the camera on her whenever grant speaks
and then i can put the TV on mute
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Oct 23, 2009 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good read
My list of possibilities: Minny, Memphis, NJ, Milwaukee and NY. I think we top 2 or 3 of them and end up with 24 wins.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 23, 2009 3:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Man
You really aim high with that 24 wins nonsense.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 23, 2009 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm hopeful
but I don’t think we are better than that many other teams and if we were to win 27+ games we’d likely end up better than 6 or 7 other teams. I just don’t think that will happen. I hope I’m wrong, but being better than 2-3 other teams seems about right to me.
We have 7 fairly important players, including 3 starters, that are 23 or younger. I think it will be fun, but I expect serious growing pains as well.
Also, limiting my expectations allows me to be positive about the small improvements as we rebuild. If I go in expecting huge improvements and we only improve slightly, I would be disappointed. I’d rather be pleasantly surprised.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 23, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There you go spouting that perspective bullshit again
What did I tell you about that boy?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 23, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We are better than
the Clippers, Warriors, Thunder, and the Grizzlies in the west alone.
by mayfieldcol on Oct 23, 2009 9:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Now thats optimistic.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.
by Aykis16 on Oct 23, 2009 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We had similar records to them last year and
we gained a coach and the probable ROY. We also have a young team.
by mayfieldcol on Oct 25, 2009 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Clippers will win more than 30 games and we won't
They have more talent than we do and more size.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 24, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
HT - there is no denying the talent base
The Clippers last year had: Baron Davis, Eric Gordon, Al Thornton, Chris Kaman, Zach Randolph, Marcus Camby, Ricky Davis – there is little to argue that there is a ton of talent there. And yet, 19 wins. Dysfuncitonality > Wins.
They eliminated some of the distractions but also kept a lot. Gordon will be better, Davis may not be injured, Randolph is gone, Kaman should be healthy, Camby should be healthy, Blake Griffin is a stud and the likely RoY.
On the other hand, Mike Dunleavy is still in dual positions, Ricky Davis is on the team, they are still the unwanted step child @ Staples, and history is no predictor of the future – but these are the Clippers. They could win 19, they could win 39. The Warriors are their co-joined twin as they share this state of confusion.
by betweentheeyes on Oct 25, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Talent will always overcome bad coaching
As bad as a GM Dunleavy might be, he’s not a bad enough coach to drag down the talent. Davis and Griffin will be a force this year. Unless they have the injuries like last year they will be much better. Add Camby and Kaman in the middle, and Gordon shooting like he did against us last year, and there’s no way they’re anywhere as bad as they were last year.
Wash, Clips & Sac all lost at least 10 games due to injury last year. Baring a repeat, the Cipps will improve the most, followed by Wash, and then the Kings. The Clips have already beat Portland, Utah, GW, NOH, and gave the Spurs & LAL a run for their money. They will finish 2nd in the Pacific, and be a playoff contender.
IMHO it will come down to Houston and the Clips for the 8th playoff spot.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 25, 2009 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Case in point
The 91 Lakers.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 25, 2009 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
we had more talent than 17 wins last year
so I disagree
by mayfieldcol on Oct 25, 2009 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's no doubt we'll win more games
But, who will win more Us , Wash or Clips.
All three had more talent than 20 wins last year.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 26, 2009 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clips have a bad coach
I think we will win more than they do.
by mayfieldcol on Oct 26, 2009 8:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We come in 5th
from bottom. Ahead of memphis, GS, Minny and Mil. Its close though, no one doesn’t win at least 20 games this year. Okl dissappoints and also finishes in the bottom 10.
The Clippers – Who the hell knows? (I’d guess about a .500 team though)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2009 11:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh - and shockingly
We win the Lottery! and have our choice of Wall and Favors.
(we select Favors)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2009 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Min is better than you think.
They have a good frontcourt. Clippers have Dunleavy.
by mayfieldcol on Oct 26, 2009 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Minny might have a good frontcourt
But not without Kevin Love who broke his hand (or something like that—I forget what it was exactly) an is expected to be out like 3-4 months.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 26, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And big Al may have messed up his achilles
compensating for his knee. Those achilles injuries can drag on forever. I’m also not sure Minny will score much enough to win a lot of games. Something we have trouble with as well with Cisco off our bench.
(I think they’re saying its only 8 weeks for Love though)
Casspi, May and Noce, they need to score at least 25-30 between them off the bench. Martin and Tyreke look to be a lock for 40-45, JT and Hawes for 25-30 (hopefully) and Mason for 4 :).
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 26, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no way I would ever want Al Jefferson in a swap for Kevin Martin
Even with Martin’s injuries accounted for.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 26, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if he's seen Big Al in more than a game or two
there’s no way lltg would either.
Big Al is the anti-lttg big guy, soft, scores a lot, but is worthless defending the rim.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Oct 26, 2009 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I forgot NJ
We’re probably better. They have Devin Harris, a good young center in Lopez and not much else. SF, SG and PF all very suspect. For argument say KM =Harris, I think JT=Lopez (close enough) we have Shawes, Tyreke, Casspi, Noce, Cisco.
They have Yi (?), Courtney Lee (?) terrance Williams (?) not much else but Alston off the bench.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 26, 2009 6:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lee is very good
So, I think he’s an asset to NJ myself.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 26, 2009 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lee is 'good'
sure he’s an asset but a real question mark on a team where he’s not just setting up a roster of good shooters or DHoward. Good defender though.
I’m just saying we’re probably a better team.
Houston could also fall far. If McGrady can’t come back, one more freakin’ injury . . . .
Who knows? Thats what pre-season hope is all about.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 26, 2009 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's easy to underestimate C-Lee
Kinda interested to see how he progresses as the season moves along.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 26, 2009 8:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Any non-biased observation
cannot look at this team at the beginning of this year and place the Kings in a more favorable light than any other team in the NBA. I would suggest that only Milwaukee and maybe Minnesota and Memphis are in the neighborhood. Tough to be a city starting with “M”.
Give it a few months. The rookie and the improvement of Thompson and Hawes, and given a healthy Martin, and outsiders will start to offer more favorable comments. Right now, talent verses talent and name versus name (remember that no one else in the country knows who any of these guys are) just leaves us #30 out of 30.
’Tis what it is.
Lower their expectations and rise to met them
by left hand on Oct 26, 2009 5:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















