What the Kings Need From a Small Forward
The Sacramento Bee has two pieces dealing with the small forward position today -- one from Jason Jones that looks at the contenders for the still undecided starting spot, and a column from Ailene Voisin on the early returns for Omri Casspi. Jones susses out what exactly each option (other than Andres Nocioni, who will be the team's first wing off the bench) can bring. For Francisco Garcia, it's ball-handling. For Desmond Mason, it's slashing and defense. For Donte Greene, it's potentiall defense. For Casspi, it's hustle and energy.
But there's an unspoken skill that is absolutely vital for the success of the starting unit, of which two of the four contenders stand out: shooting.
Kevin Martin and Tyreke Evans are going to drive to the hoop. A lot. The Kings have little post game. Ergo, you need shooters on the floor to open things up. You need shooters to hit those buckets off Martin/Evans kick-outs. You need shooters to keep the defense from sagging in. You think putting Mason in the corner is going to keep his defender from helping on the dribble penetration? Garcia can nail those shots, and Casspi shot 45% from three in Euroleague last year. Having spot-up shooters on the wings will help Evans so, so much.
Defense should also be a primary consideration, and I understand the attempts of Westphal to plug Mason in. I may not agree with them. But I understand them. No disrespect to Mason or any player over the age of 30, but if it's going to turn into a season of fits and starts for him -- if Mason is going to miss a few games a month with spasms or soreness or swelling -- Westphal should go a different direction from Day 1. Injuries happen, and you can't do much about that. But when your oldest player misses the first two preseason games after being named the initial starter at the one true question mark position ... you need to rethink things.
And it isn't as if the others won't play defense. Casspi, particularly, has been all over the place -- and effort is a big part of defense, especially on the wings. (Skill and size matter more in the frontcourt, and speed matters most in defending the point.) Casspi has nothing if not effort. I'm not calling for Casspi to get a shot at the starting slot, but he belongs in the conversation every bit as much as the others do, given that the others have not been overly impressive while Casspi has been quite impressive. And he certainly deserves consideration for substantial minutes, in my opinion.
I doubt that's a consideration, which is unfortunate. Why do I doubt it? Because of this Westphal quote in Voisin's column.
"[Omri] just needs some experience."
He hasn't needed NBA experience to be one of the team's three best players in the first two games. And as a kid who played four seasons of professional basketball in Israel, he's not exactly green. Look at Nicolas Batum last season. Young rookie from France -- starting small forward on a 50+ win team. Experience might be one important consideration, but it's not more important than talent and production. If it were, Kenny Thomas would be starting over Jason Thompson.
There's a lot of preseason left, though, so I'll just be over here in the corner hoping Casspi makes this an urgent matter by continuing to blow everyone away.
6 recs |
150 comments
|
Comments
Bullseye
Given that Tyreke is going to be a slashing beast who can pass out to shooters your point is really in the bullseye. There needs to be people on the floor who can knock down threes in an inside out games. Omri’s stroke looked great and I think that he can be a good shooter. I didn’t know he had such good stats, but given what I saw I believe it. I hope PW is listening.. Definitely recc’ed
by MustangMBS on Oct 9, 2009 6:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Mason & SF Spot
TZ & Mustang- I don’t see a problem w/Mason as our starting SF if that is what transpires. As far as shooters, don’t forget we have Hawes as our starting C that can shoot from outside, so can Martin and Garcia (if he is on the floor). When Reke drives he can dish to Martin or Hawes or Garcia and when K-Mart drives he can dish to Spence, or Reke (needs to work on his spot up jumper). I also watched the practice scrimmage and Reke did a good job dishing to JT down low for inside buckets.
by RapnRodney on Oct 9, 2009 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ad interference
I have a problem with this outback cleaner ad running across the text with no way to stop it. Any body else object?
by buckmacbud on Oct 9, 2009 6:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't see it
Maybe cause I use firefox
by MustangMBS on Oct 9, 2009 7:05 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I use firefox
and I haven’t seen the ad yet today, but yesterday it was making me want to kill someone. Good thing I don’t know where there’s a local Subaru dealer.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Oct 9, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Apologies to all
It’s been fixed. The network folks are sorry it got through.
by Ziller on Oct 9, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank God!
I thought you’d sold your soul to the advertising devil
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Oct 9, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's annoying but you can close the ad at the bottom of it.
As for Omri, I really hope he can step into a starting position and fit.
This season is filled with so many hopes and so little knowns.
Do you smoke grass in space Bowie? Or do you smoke astro turf?
by kangsfan on Oct 9, 2009 7:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's a little early to decide Mason isn't going to be healthy
I mean one of our youngest players is out with ankle issues. Does that mean he’ll be too injury prone this season? Yeah, I know, Mason is older and coming off injuries. But if he impressed Westphal that much in practice, I want to see him on the floor before writing him off. While I’d love to see Casspi earn the nod, I really have fears about how young all of our starting players are, except for Martin. Obviously Garcia is no rookie, but I’ve just never seen him as the wiley vetran how finds a way to get it done.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 8:07 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Injuries
The difference is that Hawes is a big part of the team’s future. No matter how this season turns out, Mason isn’t a big part of the team’s future. You don’t have much choice than to just take Hawes’s injuries as they come, since he’s your best/only center. Mason is on an unguaranteed contract, and again, isn’t a big part of the team’s future no matter what happens.
And it seems far less likely that you’ll unlock some hidden potential in Mason than you would in Casspi, Greene or even Garcia.
by Ziller on Oct 9, 2009 8:17 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Are we playing for our future or our present?
I know this sounds like an obvious question, since it appears unlikely we will even have a shot at the playoffs this year. But . . . if you are really just focused on the future, why sign a guy like Mason at all? It makes absolutely no sense. Which leads me to wonder of maybe the Maloofs asked Westphal to get back to winning sooner rather than later.
As part of the rebuilding process, at some point you have to start adding some vets. Mason is only two year older than Lamar Odom and has actually played fewer years in the NBA. Don’t know if Mason is one of the vetran pieces that actually may play a part in our return to greatness respectability .500 ball. But if this year is also about trying to get more wins , and if Mason is the best option to do that, then you really have to let things play out. Mason may or may not not be a big part of the Kings future, but he could very well be a big part of their now.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if you are really just focused on the future, why sign a guy like Mason at all? It makes absolutely no sense.
No disagreement here.
My point wasn’t to reassert my issues with the Mason signing so much as to note that if you’re waiting on Casspi to get experience to consider him as a “now” player while starting a player of Mason’s repute, you’re probably making the wrong decision.
But this is way too early for all that.
by Ziller on Oct 9, 2009 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting that PW is talking out loud about the 3
and saying nothing about PG despite his earlier ‘no one has the job yet’. I guess all the other spots are decided: Evans, Martin, JT, Hawes.
Not suprising but
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Hawes decided?
It will be interesting to see if he owns a starting spot or not, once his ankles are better. I agree on the PG spot. I thought their would be a real competition for day one starter. But so far it looks like I was wrong on that one.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no way Hawes doesn't start.
I would instantly regret the coaching hire if that was the case because it would be simply a stupid decision. Spencer is the best choice at 5 period.
by Kusian on Oct 9, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not arguing that he is the best center
Just found it intersting that Westphal starting Mays said that the team was playing more smoothly when he was on the floor instead of Hawes. I’m all for intrigue this year.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
I don’t know why, but when I first read that I was thinking miles-per-gallon
by markdog333 on Oct 9, 2009 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess I just wonder about how many of the slashing types we need on the floor. I think that the with Evans running the show Omri is a better match, but if Sergio was running point then Mason might be better in there, both defensively and offensively…
by MustangMBS on Oct 9, 2009 8:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
There aren’t a lot of players on this team—except for Martin—that are just as effective from the outside or the inside.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 8:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For me, this is Garcia's spot to lose
But TZ nailed this on the head, defense is nice but we need a shooter on the wings to open up dribble penetration. Desmond Mason is not that guy. I’m still not entirely sure why we signed him, and being labeled a “Westphal guy” isn’t a good enough reason and kind of raises red flags of favortism in my mind.
The back spasms thing is worrying. Sure, we shouldn’t label him as injury prone based on 2 preseason games missed, but back spasms are a tricky thing. They’re not something easily predictable and they don’t just go away. It will most likely be a problem during the season, it’s just a matter of how much.
Oh, and I’d be fine with Casspi starting. Just sayin’.
Dip til I rip
http://reclaimingthetitle.wordpress.com
by Muff209 on Oct 9, 2009 8:18 AM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
I love Cisco
He may be my favorite King, but I’m just convinced that he’s more effective as your primary leader / shooter off the bench.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think I feel pretty much the same way.
Ultimately, as long as Cisco is in at the end of any close game, I’m happy.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Oct 9, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if shooters are the thing...
What about Noce starting at the 4, Omri at the 3. That would create a competition between Shock and Hawes for the starting center.
If Shock starts that would give us a bench with Spencer, May, Mason, Garcia and Beno, with Brockman getting fighting May for that spot.
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 8:19 AM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
i dont mind Mason
But if we need players, not coaches.
I wouldn’t mind if he didn’t get signed. Then Sergio and Donte could get a few more minutes, Donte at the 3 off the bench and Sergio when Beno or Evans plays 2.
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 8:22 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
sorry for the bad grammar this AM i am just now getting coffee
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 8:25 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
I forgive you
but Mr. Vonnegut is probably turning in his grave.
by passionforPERPS on Oct 9, 2009 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a big Vonnegut guy
I have no idea what you mean. He drew little pictures and scribbles.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some interesting things have emerged
I wonder exactly how open the Kings would be to trading Nocioni as quickly as possible given that Casspi is a potentially better fit in the starting lineup. If he can handle the ball and share facilitating duties with Evans, that makes the Kings better. If he can play with energy, rebound and hit 3’s, those are all things the Kings would have to consider for any SF at this point.
On the other hand, if you’re PW, you have to think that any player will start because they are the best chance for the Kings to win on any given night. I’m not sure that Mason would have given the Kings THAT chance anyway.
If anything, so far, we know that Casspi has leaped ahead from where we thought (at the beginning of camp), Greene is pretty much where he was a year ago, Garcia and Nocioni aren’t as valuable as Casspi is (potentially) by the end of the camp at the SF spot.
What this all could mean is that Garcia could be the first G off the bench, instead of Beno replacing either Evans or Martin in that fashion.
The ripple effects of starting Casspi could not only mean that he’s developed as a player than any of us could thought (a good thing to be sure), but it also means that Donte Greene may have gotten his opportunity to get real rotation minutes sometime this year if the Kings find a way to dump Nocioni’s contract for an expiring deal.
Ripple effects have major impact down the line. This could be one of those ripples. That said, it’s only after 2 pre-season games. It’s too early to really speculate (but that’s why we’re here right?) on all of this.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 8:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i would love too have this ripple turn into a wave of change
But Donte needs to do a little more before things can really turn over.
Rock the boat.
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 8:32 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Good stuff
I think this would really make sense. I would like to see Donte’ be able to play PF both because it gets him away from the 3 point line, which he seems to love like a moth to flame, and his length. He just needs some more muscle and a lot more development…
by MustangMBS on Oct 9, 2009 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd be shocked
If Omri developed the consistency to start before the all start break. Starters need consistent performance , bench guys can be a little more hot and cold because you’re looking for a spark.
by ElRonToro on Oct 9, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep I agree
But, we’ll see. Patience is the key word here.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Donte’ needs more of everything
He just needs some more muscle and a lot more development…
I would LOVE to see Donte’ work out and become a starter. I’d love to see him pull a Gerald Wallace—except for us. But, to say he just needs more of any one or two things seemed very simplistic. At this point, no one knows what position he plays, what shots he can make, what he brings to the table (other than size.) He shot the 3 great in college, so he could stretch the floor at the 3. Except he can’t make threes any more. He has the height to take it to the rim. But he hasn’t shown any toughness. He is tall enough to play the 4, but he hasn’t even been able or willing to post up on threes.
Until Donte’ finds some kind of game, I just don’t seem him deserving of a lot of playing time. Just like Casspi, he has to prove he is worthy of more time when he gets limited minutes.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 8:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Dang
That was supposed to be a reply to Mustang. Grrrr.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 8:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uhmm..
I would have to agree with you. Donte’ is not showing he has what it takes to play in the NBA right now. Not saying he is a lost cause. Just saying he needs A LOT of development. Some maturity as well.
In looking at the whole roster we have a serious deficiency in the Big department. If we trade Noc as discussed who else is going to play 4 when we have to use JT at 5? We have few options unless the trade is for a good 5.
by MustangMBS on Oct 9, 2009 9:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
with May and Brockman that probably isn’t an issue… OK
by MustangMBS on Oct 9, 2009 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't feel bad
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait! I AM that guy.
Oh you’ve just made it worse . . .
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It stood on its own anyway
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
have to say, this is a poorly reasoned piece
First, in a Kings climate in which the coach and management need to make defense a priority, Ziller focuses on outside shooting as if that is the priority.
Second, and much more awkward, Zill reasons that when an over 30 year old has back spasms right after being named starter, we really need to rethink whether he should be starter. What biased, absurd analysis. SB’s Hawes comment above is on the money and Zill’s response (that Hawes is part of the future) is a non sequitur.
We can criticize PW’s decision to start Mason, but the fair thing would be to acknowledge the legitimate reasons for the decision, and then challenge those. If Mason has leadership to offer on the defensive end, if he is a professional, goes about his business the right way, is willing to TALK on defense and say the right things, see plays develop, serve as a coach on the floor, and if this helps instill a defensive philosophy and discipline in our young turks, then Mason could dramatically improve our team and give the rebuilding effort a much more solid foundation. That value might ultimately mean more to the team than better spacing on offense. It is a question worth debating.
That’s the debate we should be having.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
by Holmdel on Oct 9, 2009 8:48 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
+1
That is absolutely the debate. Can Mason make the Kings a better team in the here and now? You have an outside threat with K-Mart, an inside threat with "Reke, a center who can pull the other team’s center away from the rim, and a PF who seems to have a nice little elbow jumper as well as the ability to slam it home. Whether our three can make the outside shot is not nearly as important as whether he can help turn a bunch of young talent into a team.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Apologies
I forgot to take Mason’s magic defensive aura into account. How terrible of me.
That I’m arguing that I think the Kings need to a shooter at the three to help Martin/Evans and the Kings offense be at its best isn’t to ignore all other viewpoints. I mean, did you miss this?
Defense should also be a primary consideration, and I understand the attempts of Westphal to plug Mason in. I may not agree with them. But I understand them.
Which I followed with an explanation of why, if Mason will possibly be in-and-out of the line-up with age-related injuries, his admitted defensive contributions won’t be worth the stability and continuity of a young player like Casspi getting major minutes with the added bonus that Garcia or Casspi would help the offense much more than Mason would.
Also, there was this:
And it isn’t as if the others won’t play defense. Casspi, particularly, has been all over the place — and effort is a big part of defense, especially on the wings. (Skill and size matter more in the frontcourt, and speed matters most in defending the point.) Casspi has nothing if not effort.
Did I really not acknowledge defense in this point, Holmdel?
I’m also curious to find out what bias you think I hold.
by Ziller on Oct 9, 2009 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think you acknowledged defense, but only to dismiss it
and the bias to me is (a) you’ve gone on record really slamming the Mason signing, and so you have a vested interest in the Mason experiment turning out badly; (b) you seem to have a bias in favor of offensive efficiency; © and finally a bias in favor of instant gratification – and by this I mean, you so hunger for the thrill of discovering that one of our young guys (Prince Casspian, in this case) is a K-Mart type diamond in the rough that you hedge toward getting that guy burn even at the expense of considerations of overall team development. (To be fair, I have this last one, too, in spades.)
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
by Holmdel on Oct 9, 2009 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you’ve gone on record really slamming the Mason signing, and so you have a vested interest in the Mason experiment turning out badly
If by “vested interest” you mean “doing an invisble Nelson Muntz laugh in the face of Paul Westphal, a coach I have applauded often the past month.” sure. I’m practically begging for Mason to fail. Let me find Jeff Gillooley’s number …
I apologize for the fact that high-scoring NBA games gets my rocks off, and that this makes me unduly biased against wings who cannot shoot.
And honestly, is there any Kings fan out there that would trade three wins for the opportunity to find out if Casspi is a stud this season? Anyone? (And this, of course, assumes Mason is three wins better than Casspi, which he almost certainly is not.)
by Ziller on Oct 9, 2009 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
we'll find out about Casspi either way
The issue isn’t whether we trade three wins to do it or not, the issue is whether we trade Mason’s on-court leadership and defensive discipline for the chance to find out a couple weeks learly about Casspi. We want to find out about Casspi yesterday, but we need leadership and to create a culture around this team that guides our young players to think the game better, prepare better, talk better on defense, etc.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
by Holmdel on Oct 9, 2009 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its a valid point
but young guys do eventually have to have some reasonable opportunity to prove thier worth on the court. Noce is on this roster remember, as is Martin, two guys that will see significant playing time.
Casspi has done exactly what a young player should do at this point, earned more minutes by his play on the floor.
It would be terrible if his good play continues through pre-season and yets he’s relegated to only a few garbage mintues once the season starts due to the presence of Mason.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't disagree with you
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
by Holmdel on Oct 9, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And if Casspi
Earns the start, more power to him.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And honestly, is there any Kings fan out there that would trade three wins for the opportunity to find out if Casspi is a stud this season? Anyone? (And this, of course, assumes Mason is three wins better than Casspi, which he almost certainly is not.)
This describes my problem perfectly. Fans want to see young guys play and develop. Coaches have reputations to establish and protect. I don’t think most fans would trade the three wins, but a coach like Reggie Theus certainly would and I’m concerned that Wetphal may have the same, um…Phailing. (Sorry, had to be done.)
by Carl on Oct 9, 2009 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
Westphal feels comfortable enough that management is sort of giving him a “pass” on W-L record for this season. The fans, on the other hand… well, any of the fans that are focused only on Wins this year aren’t going to be paying much attention anyways, and I think Westphal is smart enough to not try to cater to them.
Next season, I suspect, is where there’s going to start to be an actual expectation of progress being reflected in the W-L record, from the people that matter.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Oct 9, 2009 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know you weren't responding directly to me
but I don’t think defense is the key here. I think it’s leadership. We have a lot of young talent. We have a lot of guys that can put the ball into the basket. We don’t play any D to speak of, but I really feel this will improve with the new coach and new players. But what we are sorely lacking is leadership. Clearly this draft was about getting tough players, which was directly in line with Westphal’s statement when he was hires that we needed to get tougher.
I ask anyone to explain why Westphal pushed to sign Mason (which I think based on the fact that he wants to start him that he must have.) Was it for his shooting? His slashing? Because garcia and Noc don’t play D. If anything, the 3 might have been our spot of storngest D last year.
I personally believe it was because PW quickly realized we have no leadership whatsoever. I don’t need Mason to be a coach. We have those already. I need him to be a player that makes the players around him better. A uniter. A leader.
Not saying you have any bias at all Ziller. I like love to read your takes. I just think that you are possibly too focused on the trees and that you are missing the forest here.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
well said...and I think you've got PW's view on Mason exactly
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
by Holmdel on Oct 9, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
If anything, the 3 might have been our spot of storngest D last year.
Something I agree with.
I think you might have made TZs point there on the Mason signing.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Signing or starting
I was very dubious of the signing. But see, here’s the thing. You trusted that Evans was a better point guard than Rubio because the team management said he was. I did and do too. The signing might have been dumb, or not. But after watching him play, working with him, and having a very vested interest in winning games this year, Westphal says he is the man to start. Doesn’t that give you a clue that maybe, just maybe, he sees something you don’t?
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm certain he's an excellent guy
and that was a big part of the decision, but there are serious issues, balances, that a rebuilding team has to go through.
Eventually you have to get to the ‘build’ part.
Now wait, if we didn’t already have Noce, Cisco, (perhaps Donte’) able to play the 3, and a young kid in Casspi thats really showing some promise – I would feel differently.
If it was an old vet at the 4 or 5 – no problem – HELP!
But at the 3?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't know man
I really don’t know which of our young guys are going to prove they are playoff claiber starters and which will end up being back-ups. But I do believe that at some point we are going to stop relying on all young guys and find a veteran who takes away the starting job from either the 3,4, or 5. Backups are all well and good. But you have to have a starting five that are all good enough to beat the other team’s starting five. In my opinion we have two of those for sure,and three that are still still question marks. The SF is probably our biggest question of all, even though we clearly have too many of them.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I sort of agree
The SF is probably our biggest question of all, even though we clearly have too many of them.
But I don’t believe Mason (and I don’t think you do either) is the answer to it. I don’t think Noce is the long term answer but is probably the guy this year, Cisco is my main bench guy, Donte’ has shown me nothing on the court, Casspi has but its early.
So, if Noce is the main guy this season (I believe he will/should be barring a trade) – then Mason/Cisco depending on lineups, uh – where does that leave Casspi and Donte’ at least a few mintues to prove thier worth?
Now, if Noce is traded then I think there’s room for a vet like Mason on the roster.
On the ‘sort of’ question: I’m still not convinced we have long term answers at either the 4 or 5 – or at least one of them. I don’t think we should be counting those chickens.
But thats another conversation.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree completely
Donte’ would be great if he ever gets it together. Noc is what he is. Which is porbably not a starter on a playoff team. Casspi looks great! (In two games) Garcia has always been solid if not spectacular. Mason is probably not our best long term solution. So what you have to decide is, who is our “now” solution while we trade at least one of these guys and figure out who are “then” solution is. My point is not that Casspi/Greene/Garcia is not our 3 of the future. (Who really knows?) But that—especially if Noc is the backup 2—Mason may be the best “now” solution.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As far as going for a vet part
I’m actually in the minority I think when I say I’d be fine with a Carlos Boozer or other significant, expensive player – probably in the frontcourt. If there’s not a hot Big-man prospect in next years draft we need to address it. Can’t wait forever.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't know if it's Boozer
But I agree 100% with the concept.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
just an example
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mason is not a leader
He never has been. Age does not always directly correlate to wisdom. Do you think Mason made Durant and Westbrook better players? Do you think he made the Bucks a better team?
I don’t see how you can say yes to those. All Mason can be is a nice guy to hang out and teach Evans how to paint. He can’t shoot, can’t dribble, he used to dunk but is a long way from the athleticism he had when he almost won the dunk contest.
His stats imply that he makes the team better defensively, but apparently not enough that Brooks and Presti wanted to keep him around to solve their biggest weakness which also happens to be D.
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 10:04 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
the painting comments crack me up
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
by Holmdel on Oct 9, 2009 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then I ask again, why?
If everything you say is true, and if after all that, Westphal still wants him to start, Westphal must be a terrible coach. Funny how a guy who can’t dribble, dunk, or shoot has a career shooting percentage of 45%, and has our coach wanting to start him. maybe he is just really good in bed?
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Westphal has some proving to do to
And I am willing to wait. It is still preseason.
High percentage of dunks and fast break lay ups will lead to high completion rate, but will decline with age and injuries.
Maybe Mason can learn to hit some jumpers with this coaching staff. But I would rather see Donte learn to shoot than Mason.
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 10:25 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Can't argue with that
But until he can do it in practice, he shouldn’t be set lose to do it for real.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with that
skills are developed in practice and free time. A player has to earn their minutes in practice…unless their initials are AI of course.
by markdog333 on Oct 9, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My take is this and its simplistic
There are too many SFs on this roster! Maybe two too many, maybe only one.
Decide who you really want to keep so they can actually get on the floor and who the starting and the major rotation guy(s) are will eventually sort itself out.
Hmmm I wonder if we could trade one them for a young center who doesn’t see many mintues somewhere else? Whats that kid’s name in Utah? :)
If it were my choice and I could get some significant talent back I like Pookey would trade Noce and keep Mason as some Vet exp (on the bench). That leaves you with a number of guys who don’t yet merit the starting spot (I believe Noce probably thinks he does and that he’s probably right) who will battle for it – and be better for that battle.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 9:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
if Mason wants to coach let him
But we don’t need to import other team’s castoffs to be our team leaders. If we keep doing that, then how can we expect our youth to grow into leadership roles?
I believe you learn to lead but only if you are given chances. If Mason is our veteran leader at either end of the floor, then where does that leave Kevin, Jason, Spencer, or even Evans?
Let’s not forget that Westphal was criticized in Seattle for playing washed up vets like Hawkins over future stars like Rashard Lewis. Is that what is going on here, now?
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 9:28 AM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Really?
But we don’t need to import other team’s castoffs to be our team leaders
Yep look at those poor schmucks who did so poorly with our castoffs, like Hedo, GW, Bibby. Man those guys suck!
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ah but there is a difference between castoff vets
And our undeveloped young talent leaving.
Hedo and Wallace did not (and could not) get what they wanted as far as opportunity, playing time, money. They got those chances somewhere else.
Whereas Mason has had his chance. He is not going to develop into Gerald Wallace or Hedo. He is not nearly as productive as Bibby is, and never has been.
Importing Mason is not the same as another team picking up Hedo because we couldn’t pay him. Nobody wants to pay Mason but Westphal.
In fact, the Kings are following the same pattern so far in letting the known but lesser player play while the unknown potential has to scrape for time. Why should Evans, Casspi, Greene listen to some marginal player who has never won anything? What leadership does Mason have other that being an Art Collector?
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 9:47 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
The point I am making is not being rookies and vets
But catsoffs in general. You are making the assumption that because he was not good enough for one team, he should not be good enough for our team. My point is that maybe our team needs something the other team didn’t. Clearly the coach thinks that is the case. You have to ask yourself what he sees.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I honestly think Westphal is taking a shortcut
He has coached Mason, likes his attitude and personality, and wants to have some comfort in a new, high risk situation. I think it has less to do with basketball than you think.
But you cannot and should not try to make other people comform to be like one personality or another.
I do think it is good to have a solid person like Mason around for inconsistent and immature guys like Donte, but ultimately Donte and Spencer and whoever else has to do it themselves, and not through osmosis.
Plus, who likes to be compared to their older brother, or another employee, or the kid in the front of the class. I think that if Westphal think he can hold other players to a standard set by Mason then he is in for a huge failure.
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 10:36 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
The day the little brother
beats the crap out of his big brother. You give him the starting job. But make them earn it. I am 100% okay with any of our threes starting when they have earned that right.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
so far Casspi has done that
My point is, do you want to keep Mason around because he is better? Because I think he is marginal. Because he is a nice guy? Nice guys finish last. To set an example for other players? I don’t think they will respond to that.
What is Mason’s motive? To help the young guys out? No. He wants to continue to beat them, at least in the coaches eyes, and right now I think Westphal and you have blinders on if you think Mason is going to make this a better team now and especially in the long run.
Give me some stat or some real proof that Mason makes teams better. Because so far his career proves otherwise. That is my proof.
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 11:13 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Wait, back up a minute
so far Casspi has done that
How do you figure? In head-to-head combat, mason earned the start. Casspi has played less than twenty minutes. Mason has not played in the preseason. No way to compare stats yet. Except that in the open practice, Mason outplayed Casspi.
What is Mason’s motive? To help the young guys out?
What is any NBA player’s motive? To be the best player. Heaven forbit Mason actually wants to beat out the other 3s.
Give me some stat or some real proof that Mason makes teams better.
Hmm, has played in the NBA for nine years, averaging 30+ minutes, 12 points and 4.5 rebounds. And Casspi has . . . played great in two preseason games. Shoot even Ike played good in two games.
Not saying Casspi won’t be the man, just that you have no proof he or any other three on our team is better than Mason at this point.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Take me to lunch or lose me forever.
The draft lottery has reinforced my belief that there are not enough bad words in the English language.
by LeaguePassAddict on Oct 9, 2009 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay looks like I'm out of here
Carry on the good fight!
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crystal Blue persuasion......
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
more like crystal clear
but you get a nod, young fella, for quoting a Tommy James and the Shondell’s song. I still don’t know what a Shondell is.
and if that was otherwise a reference to “a new vibration”, it is definitely LTMI. WayTMI
by betweentheeyes on Oct 9, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
my fear is that Mason hasnt earned it
But that Westphal is afraid to take a chance with an unknown entity.
Your point about Mason being needed to lead just doesn’t make sense. He has not been a leader. He has been 12 and 4 on bad teams for 9 years. That’s it. If you are happy with that then I’m sorry.
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 11:43 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
If you think Casspi will be better than that this year, than I’m sorry.
Being better than Mason in practice is the first step to being better than 12/4 in real games.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Oct 9, 2009 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mason wants to continue to beat them...
At least I hope so. If not, he is no good to us. If Omri and Donte can’t compete with Mason in practice to earn playing time, i’m afraid they wouldn’t last long in this league. That is exactly the example they need to see and overcome.
by markdog333 on Oct 9, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
After an especially long off season and with the addition of some kids
who look like they can actually play, I know the temptation to comment and speculate is almost irresistible, but shoot it’s only been 2 preseason games. While we were making the playoffs I didn’t even care about the playoffs. Maybe we learn something towards the end of the preseason games, maybe not. Hopefully we will have a better idea after a couple of weeks into the real season but these impassioned arguments after 2 preseason games. Please.
Personally I think that if Omri earns the starting gig or big minutes off the bench the best thing for Donté would be a season in D league.
Homdel – TZ did mention the importance of D in the post. I don’t think he tied it together as well as usual but he didn’t ignore it, in fact he mentioned how important it was going to be. I think saying it was a poorly reason argument is overkill.
"We are in the business of kicking butt and business is very, very good." - Charles Barkley
by Bluejohn on Oct 9, 2009 9:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Donte definitely needs some D-League time still
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 9:54 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
I think Donte needs D-League time for 2 months
So he can get a consistent playing rhythm in a game. He needs to shoot, find some comfort level, and practice on the weak ends of his game that can make PW comfortable that he will be ready if and when there is a need for Donte to come back on the active roster.
Donte has always been the best bet for the D-League, and I’ll be very disappointed if the Kings don’t give Donte extended time there for his development. You don’t get cheaper than Donte in terms of price, and if he develops this season (even slower than you were hoping), it’s much cheaper than it would take to develop a top 10 player in his rookie season.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
unless he somehow someway shows a lot of growth in the rest of the pre-season games.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm not sure about that
I fear Donte is too talented for the D-League, and he will reinforce his bad habbits playing there. I think he would be better off battling with NBA level talent where he will not be the star of the team. He needs to find a niche. I think he can be a very good roll player on a good team.
I love that he is concentrating on his defense. With his length and athleticism, he should be a good offensive rebounder too.
by markdog333 on Oct 9, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the other argument is that the Kings have brought a bit of the D-League
to the coaching staff. The Kings also have a fair amount of D-League possibiities to engage these guys together in practice (Mancakes, Zohan, Ely,.. Beno).
You can’t call “D-League” on Doné in October. You might as well put Pampers in his locker, it will kill whatever confidence he gained with his hard work in the gym this summer.
by betweentheeyes on Oct 9, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The flip side to that argument is
How can he develop without any real minutes to do so?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Minutes that
Mean something, either here or the D league. There’s things he might learn there, game control/pacing of his game, leadership . . .
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How does one learn leadership?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 10, 2009 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
again, timing-wise, it is just too early to say, but as far as your other reference:
real minutes?
the D-Leauge will give him more minutes against a variety of (lesser) competitors, but practice time with the bevvy of coaches, assistant coaches and HoF consultants along with his fellow teammates can be considered just as much, real minutes.
The Question: Ego builder to be the King of the NBDL or Ego crusher as you must be Triple A-ed to show you belong in the Bigs (again)?
Another part of the question (extra credit): for someone that needs to show he has value, is averaging 1.2 ppg, 0.9 rbg a gonad shrinker?
by betweentheeyes on Oct 9, 2009 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know there's a reasonable debate here
I just believe that for him it probably makes sense.
He needs to learn to put the pieces of his Game together – if he can.
Right now they’re all over the place.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
he is like freshly mixed jello
lots of sweet stuff there, but no form.
dropping him to the D-League (again, it is October) later in the year is not excluding his opportunity to practice and learn with the coaching staff and get some NBA minutes. Will it help fill what is the big chasm for all of Donté’s peaks: skills galore but no evidence of what do with them. Will the NBDL learn him some smarts?
Compare Donté to Tyreke – this rookie knows where to be on the floor and has some visible command of the game – where to position, how to involve and be involved. When we see that from Mr. Green, then his talent will mean something, until then he is all hype HUP*huge upside potential"
by betweentheeyes on Oct 9, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I an not one of those who has sung his praises
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I am one who has
But he will perform better with consistent minutes. All players do. if PW doesn’t have any real minutes without Garcia in the backcourt (potentially), than I fail to see how the Kings will utilize Donte here. If anything, it means that the Kings will go smaller with Beno, Reke & Speed as a trio more often.
Donte needs consistent minutes, and he needs to receive them consistently. That isn’t going to happen with the current situation.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 10, 2009 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Leadership on the court
Interesting item of contention this who leads the assortment of players.
One note of interest. Kevin Martin has stepped up. He has started being vocal. His stating that why shouldn’t Evans play PG cause all he has been playing with is SGs who think they are PGs.
Also, on the court. Martin got after Beno for losing his defensive assignment and it costing a bucket.
I would rather see the best player on this team be developed by PW into a leader. This is a guy who works hard and brings it every night. He is to be respected by the other players.
Martin needs to be the leader of this team and Mason could unintentionally push Martin into the background and delay that development if PW tells everybody Mason leads the team.
by MustangMBS on Oct 9, 2009 10:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow haven't posted this much in months, my fingers are getting tired.
I’ve always wanted to see K-Mart become our real team leader. He’s talked about it the last couple of years. So it would be awesome to see. That being said, I don’t think a coach can develop a player into being a leader. It’s a mantle the player must find for himself. It’s not just about great play, or even talking up. Some players have it in their DNA and others don’t. To this point, K-Mart has been a lead by example kind of guy.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
sometimes in the darkest moments in the absence of light
Someone remembers to light a match.
Martin has lit his match. Why should we extinguish it with Mason?
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 10:50 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes in the darkest moments in the absence of light

Sorry couldn’t resist. Of course you should always be careful about lighting a match in this situation as well.
"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Good Call SB!
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I saw that one at the game too
Martin got after Beno for losing his defensive assignment and it costing a bucket.
The future begins now...
by eduardo_m7 on Oct 9, 2009 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like TZ's analysis
but have issues with almost everyone in this thread’s conclusions:
What do the Kings need from a small forward?
Ziller emphasizes shooting and defense, which I agree with, but I need to add something to it: playmaking.
If you take Kevin, Evans, JT, Hawes (maybe) as the core of the team, ask yourself, who makes plays of them?
Evans – all accounts I’ve seen and read lead me to believe he’s going to make plays for himself and other people, that’s one playmaker
Kevin – probably one of the best finishers in the game, but even his most strident fans wouldn’t say he’s a playmaker for other people
JT – finisher, probably a good one eventually, will make the plays around the rim and will drain jumpers
Hawes – ahh, here is the crux of the discussion. Is Spencer going to be a playmaker ala Vlade or not? I have no idea, but I think there is at least a small chance he develops into a guy you want to make decisions with the ball.
I believe you need two playmakers on offense to be good. If there is only one, you’re too easy to shut down. Chances are Hawes is not a 2nd playmaker, if that is true, then I think the Kings need more than shooting and defense from the 3, they need a dynamic player to fill that spot.
Let’s look at the 3’s on the roster:
Nocioni – won’t be here when we’re playing games that matter, if he were, I’d say he’s an average finisher and bad playmaker
Mason – too old, irrelevant
Dé3 – jury is still out, but we haven’t seen enough to be reasonably sure he’ll be good at anything yet. Donte has no NBA caliber skills right now. None. Hopefully he takes to defense, works hard, and he’ll be able to leverage that into time and a career.
Casspi – In two preseason games…he’s shown signs of at least growing into a finisher, you can see emerging NBA skills in a ridiculously small sample size.
In the long run, I think one of Casspi/Dé3, JT or Hawes aren’t the final answer unless Hawes really turns out to be special on offense. An unnamed player with All-Star level dynamic skills in one of their positions will have to be brought in before we’re good.
For this season, Mason was brought in to give the young guys someone to work against and be a pro. If Mason is getting minutes, that tells you everything you need to know about the coaching staff’s opinion of our young 3s. Mason is here to make sure the coaching staff can bury the young guys plausibly when they want to. When the young guys earn it, PW will play them unless you just think he’s stupid.
I’d be shocked if anyone in management cared a bit about wins/losses this year, though of course they’d never say that. Its about development, that doesn’t mean 40 minutes a night for our young guys.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Oct 9, 2009 11:04 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice
as I’ve said before, I think one of your two inside starters Has to be reasonably dominant against most others at thier position to have a Championship caliber team.
Both our guys rely (right now anyway) on what they consider thier athletic skills, rather than thier physical skills, if you know what I mean.
Now i suppose JT still has a chance to be physically dominant, but Hawes? He’ll always be primarily a ‘skills’ guy IMO – even if he gets better at the physical part. That makes me believe that JT may eventually be the back-up 4-5 on this team. Something he actually might be OK with . . . .
Anyway, I don’t think you can lose by going physical inside, so that (not suprisingly) is my choice to address via FA or at least in next years draft. I don’t think we can wait any longer.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can you say Derrick Favors?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's too short
and I’m worried about his wingspan. ;p
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 9, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stinky fuckhead
I hate you. How dare you ruin my dreams?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I would be all for the next big guy we can find that is close to All-Star capable. Unless we’re really, really fortunate, all the piece for this team to be good are not here yet. Even being optomistic, we’re one close to All-Star player away from being good. I’d love it if that guy were a big to help with lttg’s defensive issues and to balance out our roster.
If that guy is a big, than either one of our young guys needs to grow into a good finisher or we need to bring one in; the perfect guy to fit TZ’s formula I’ve said for a long time is Marvin Williams. Bring him and an All-Star big guy, and this team has the pieces to be good.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Oct 9, 2009 12:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Developing Donte via the D League is a better fit
Plus, the Hawks wouldn’t give up Marvin Williams anyway. He fits in with what they want to do there.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
As long as
Donte can harness some of that talent into real NBA skills.
Donte has the frame and athleticism to be a beastly defender, more than one guy has improved their jumper by leaps and bounds as their career’s blossomed.
I agree its possible Dé3 could grow into what we need, he just has a lot of growing to do.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Oct 9, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah and it won't be on the NBA roster
All this pre-season has proved that Westphal has too many other parts of the team pulling at him to really see the development of Donte work out to the way it should. PW’s focus should, and I suspect will be, about getting as many wins as he can out of this roster right now.
If you’re going to bring in Desmond Mason (let’s just say they do), play Casspi, Nocioni, and Garcia, somebody is going to be left out of that group in all likelihood. How would Greene fit into that?
Plus, right now, I’ve noticed this that Donte will play better when he knows he’s getting minutes. It may not be great production or what you ultimately what, but he will perform if he knows he won’t get yanked over every little mistake.
That won’t happen if he’s with the Kings all season long. That’s the reality of what happens when you have head coaches with better options now than what may be the best potential option 2 years from now.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Argh writing errors
Plus, right now I’ve noticed that Donte…..
It may not be great production or what you ultimately want,
Argh.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Donte is a tweenter right now
When he played in the 1st preseason game, he didn’t seem comfortable playing the 3 on the right side. But, when he set up on the left side corner he tried to drive the baseline. Maybe I’m wrong, but I think he still isn’t comfortable dribbling with his left had. So, the right corner forces him along the baseline, where he is easily cut off.
Also, as I’ve theorized in past posts, I don’t believe that his 3pt shooting is adjusted to his newly developed strength. So, right now, he’s not accurate shooting 3’s and he can’t penetrate from the right corner. That’s why I like him as a PF, or at least not playing in the corner like the Kings use their SF’s.
Maybe, your correct about the D-League, as far a developing his left hand and 3pt shooting, but I think he will learn more D from PW. In the meantime, the Kings can use his height and his improved D.
Just like Hawes & JT battled each other after practice last year, I’d like to see Donte & Omri work off each other this year. I’m just not sure Donte is willing to put in work. I’m afraid that if he’s sent off the Reno, he’ll just regress back into the shooter he was in college, which is fun for him and what he likes to do best.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 9, 2009 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no way Donte can develop without playing a lot of minutes
There is no way that you can convince me that playing time in the D-League would mean less to Donte’s development (beyond unseen developments further into training camp/pre-season) than being around PW and the coaching staff on a daily basis.
There is just no way of that HT. Donte needs to play. When he’s ready to contribute, than he needs the NBA coaching. But NBA coaching don’t mean shit if the guy can’t do nuthin on the court right now.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he stays with the Kings and doesn't start
It’s not like he is just going to be sitting around doing nothing…unless he’s lazy. I don’t think that is the case. He will spend the whole year playing against the starters in scrimmages and developing skills specific to his roll on this team.
by markdog333 on Oct 9, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see it
I think he needs to play to develop the confidence that when PW does call on him he won’t be looking over his shoulder. I’m not sure practice during the season will do that. Whether he works hard or not, I do not know. I doubt he’s lazy, but I think he needs on court time. He’s still very young.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I did agree that you might be correct about the DLeague
I just don’t know what kind of coaching he’ll get there. He didn’t get much here last year. But, this year coaching staff is more built around teaching. Including the coach of the year from the d-league. Plus Reno wants to win also, So, I’m not sure that they would even want to pull in Donte’s reins.
I just don’t know.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 9, 2009 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think I agree with you
that a playmaker may be more important than anything else at the 3 right now. But I have to ask, why doesn’t that lead us to García? He’s among our best shooters at the 3 (Ziller’s largest criterion), he’s undisputably probably our best playmaker at the 3 (your biggest criterion), and he’s a better-than-decent defender (what Westphal wants). The only two arguments against it I can think of are that he’s just too good off the bench to start or that he’s more of a 2 than a 3. We’re having tis conversation because Westphal said he liked Noc as his first 3 off the bench, and I think we saw last year that García makes a suitable 3.
I’d be all for starting him alongside Martin and Tyreke until one of our young SFs (Greene or Casspi) is ready to start.
by twasserm on Oct 9, 2009 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, crap.
I just looked at the front page, and there goes my idea.
by twasserm on Oct 9, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you
Garcia fits my criteria the best. But he’s just not good enough. I love Francisco Garcia, I completely think he is worth the money we pay him; I think he would be a tremendous 7th or maybe even 6th man on a great team. But unless Spencer develops greatness (unlikely), this team won’t be good until we find another very, good player; much better than Francisco is currently.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Oct 9, 2009 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Garcia is the perfect backup G
I have no problem with being weaker at the SF spot if it means being stronger at the PF/C spots instead. I’ll take that every day of the week. There is only one Crab Dribbler you know.
On the other hand, Garcia being asked to do something that he isn’t as capable of doing is probably not the answer either. It’s not going to help that for the 2nd season in a row, Garcia will miss the start of the season.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What T'Wolves Coach Theus Said
Coach Theus spouted a lot of non-sense in his tenure but one thing he was quoted as saying has some validity as it relates to our current SF situation. He made the point coaches do not decide playing time, players decide playing time. If Omri plays like he has in games 1 and 2, he will be too good to keep on the bench.
I personally think Donte Greene’s names should be taken out of the equation. Coming off an unproductive prior season, a dismissive summer league, and scoreless pre-season, he is down so low, he has to look up to see a lizards belly.
That leaves 3 vets and a rookie to choose among as your starter.
Omri is not your starter the first half of the season because he has not seen the league. Let him at least go through the league once, learn players tendencies, speed, strength, and favorite moves before throwing him to the fire. It would be unfair to say to Omri, “you guard LaMar Odom, you guard Carmelo Anthony, you check Kevin Durant.” Hell no. Not from Day One. The more reasonable directive is “you check Odom’s back-up, you cover Anthony’s back-up…”
So that leaves Garcia, Noccioni, and Mason.
Mason is a scrapper, finisher, with veteran presence.
Noccioni and Garcia are streaky shooters, limited athletically, but know the league inside and out.
I disagree with the sentiment about spacing defense at the “3” spot. When Evans drives to the hole, a guy like Mason can be valuable as a cutter on the weak side or baseline. As long as player is moving to an open spot, the PG has that teammate as an option. Also, JT and Hawes will drift outside the lane to free up the paint for Tyreke to score or kick out for open “J”.
I think the intangible component is what I call the “glue factor”. This is a player who adds cohesiveness to the starting unit, through leadership, hustle play, intelligence. Doug Christie was the glue when the Kings used to be good. Can Mason be this teams “glue”? I don’t know. Maybe. I know if Noccioni and Garcia are going to bomb from the perimeter, run hot and cold, provide sporadic contributions, that’s not glue.
One last thing I’d consider is this debate may be non-existent, if you pencil in Garcia as primarily a back-up “2” and Noccioni as a back-up “4”. Then minutes are distributed accordingly:
SG Martin > Garcia
SF Mason > Omri
PF JT > Noccioni
From there, Coach W disperses minutes based on match-ups and who is playing best.
by bench_blob on Oct 9, 2009 11:05 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i just think Omri and especially Donte
Might work harder if they knew it would actually get them time, rather than still coming off the bench behind some random glue guy.
But if Mason can be like Christie, maybe he isn’t so bad. I’m hesitant to make that comparison though.
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 11:24 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
If they can't earn their time in practice
by destroying the “random 30yr old glue guy”, why should they get time? That shows they’re not ready for time.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Oct 9, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes and no
With you on Garcia as back up 2, but would rather see Brockman back up JT. I think your the rotation at 3 is probably right given PWs emphasis on Mason. I hope that Omri shows that it should be otherwise
When you look at it we have too many 3s. Nocioni should be traded to some other team. The real argument for keeping him seemed to be as a backup to the 4, but with Brockman and May that doesn’t seem to be holding up now.
by MustangMBS on Oct 9, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did PW name Mason the starting 3 for the regular season?
as far as I know, it was only for the 1st preseason game. Mason’s on a none guaranteed contract so I guess we have to start playing him sometime to find out if we keep him. I think we’re a long way away from deciding on our starting 3.
Mason to me is Artest without all the 3 pt attempts. Good defense, can postup & go to the basket. For PW, a coach who was brought in to improve defense and rebounding, to want a player that can help with both is natural. Especially, since he’s on a vet min contract at best. He may not end up being the starter, but the finisher in close games where we need to perserve a lead.
As to TZ’s comment that we need a 3pt shooter at the SF to keep the lane open for Tyreke, that’s one way of doing it, but not the only way. We still have Martin & Hawes as 3pt threats. And, isn’t one of the big complaints last year that we took too many 3’s. That we didn’t attack the basket enough. So, if Mason’s man leaves him to help defend Tyreke, can’t Mason attack the basket.
And, isn’t one of the main criticisms of Donte that he took too many 3’s at the SF position. It would certainly be nice to have one player that exhibited all the talents of Cisco, Mason, & Donte but until we do (and Omri may end up being that guy), PW is going to have to use each based on the game time situation. And, that’s not a terrible situation to have.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 9, 2009 11:23 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
This so so much fun
I almost never get to play this role.

"Shut up and Coach!"
Vfettke
by SavageBeast on Oct 9, 2009 11:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
hahaha one of Pacino's funniest roles
by Ice_9ine on Oct 9, 2009 12:00 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Nice SB
You’re the picture wizard today.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice try, Ailene
Now give Ziller his computer back.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Oct 9, 2009 12:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
What the Kings Need From a Small Forward?
I vote for something LeBronesque.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 9, 2009 1:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
What's your definition of LeBronesque?
are you talking specific skills or just a superstar?
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 9, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LeBron himself would work.
We need at least one more (two or three if we don’t have any yet) star(s). So, yeah I was calling for a superstar, though a physically imposing, athletic, young, gifted ball handler, passer, and shooter who didn’t happen to be a superstar would work too. Though I’m not sure how it would be possible to have that skill-set and not be a superstar.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 9, 2009 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea, someone with all the skills is definitely a star.
With Martin & Evans attacking, and Hawes & JT battling on the boards, what type of player do we really need, for now. It would be nice to have a Carmelo, Peja in his prime, or a Durant, but that’s not going to happen this year.
I think Mason can be a poor man’s Artest without the craziness or chucking up of 3pt shoots. He can slash just as well as Tyreke if Tyreke gets doubled, he can post up as well, and he can play defense. If he were the 3pt shooter that Pega was then he might be an all-star.
I believe that a slasher from the corner can be just as big as a threat as a 3pt shooter. So, If oppenents want to leave him to go help against Tyreke, let Tyreke get him the ball and see how fast the defense can get back before he gets into the paint.
In the meantime, PW got here to improve defense & rebounding, so using the same people we had last year probably won’t get it done.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Oct 9, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone but Noc
Yes, I’m afraid it’s true. Right or wrong, he has become my new –

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Oct 9, 2009 1:30 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
The Golden Parrot is perty
Very very perty.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Oct 9, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doesn't he have to be untradeable by consensus before he gets that photo?
by twasserm on Oct 9, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, and I disagree with section on that
Some contender will want Noce.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't say that he was untradeable
I just said that he was my new albatross. And I really don’t have a good reason to feel this way – I just do. And that is really contradictory for me, as Noc does not really hurt this current squad in any way, shape or form. He plays hard and he cares. But I can’t help myself. I-just-can’t.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Oct 9, 2009 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you may need to start a 12 step at AA*
Albatross Anonymous
But I can’t help myself. I-just-can’t
.
by betweentheeyes on Oct 9, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Oct 9, 2009 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
hard to argue with that
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Beno likes

Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.
by Aykis16 on Oct 9, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In light of Cisco's injury
we may need to start this or Keon Clarks’ thread over and have a more organized discussion.
What is our lineup at the 2-3 ?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 9, 2009 4:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
And just like that -
Pfft.

The depth at the 3 was gone.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Oct 9, 2009 5:24 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he did not exist.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 9, 2009 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I think this roster is wide open
Westphal is going to put the best players he has on the court to win games. If Caspi can handle the position and plays well, he will get substantial minutes. Now with Cisco gone till halftime, Omri becomes even more important to have ready to play when the season starts. The coaching staff should be doing everything they can to get this kid ready, because they are going to need his outside shot. He is a pest on defense, which is more than I can say for the rest of the players on the roster. I say if he is ready to go, they need to get him out there. It’s not like this team is a championship caliber team. They are a young team that needs to grow and learn how to win in the NBA. Caspi will be one of those young pieces that will grow into his position. I am more concerned with our front court. We need Hawes to improve dramatically. We need JT to step his game up and start playing with a sense of urgency. We need front court players that will get rebounds and make plays. I am hoping that Coach Westphal knows how to motivate the 2 young bigs for the Kings to have any success this year. And success would be a .500 season, lets all agree on that. You just dont go from 17 wins to the playoffs in one year. There has to be some steps in between. I hope that Coach Westphal can take the pieces he has been given and can mold them into a competitive unit. We need to win games to get people back in the seats. Winning will cure most of what ails the Kings right now. Sacramento fans want to see a winner. If the team can win half the time, and a lot at home, the team will be seen as heading in the right direction. Another draft or 2, and possibly a free agent to help a young team out, and this team might find success again.
Another year, another chance to hope for the team !!
by FaStRmAn on Oct 10, 2009 11:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















