Sactown Royalty: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NFL Power Rankings for Week 11

Why Tyreke Evans and the Kings Have Been More Successful

Photo

by Rich Pedroncelli - AP

Already the hyenas invade. I have noticed a sincere uptick in "Tyreke Evans is not a point guard!" talk since Kevin Martin got injured, Beno Udrih got inserted into the starting line-up, and the Kings have gone on a 3-0 string. I actually received a thoughtful email from a reader a few days ago stating that the Kings should trade Martin because "Evans clearly is not a point guard."

The assertion is that Evans's success has come with the switch to off-guard, which hasn't actually happened: Evans is handling the ball as much as he did with Martin on the court, if not more. Paul Westphal has instituted a duty-sharing system which had even Ime Udoka bringing the ball up as a shooting guard -- this is Ime Udoka, whose greatest successes have come as a Battier-like small forward and undersized power forward.

The Kings have been more successful for the last 10 days or so, definitely. But it has less to do with the Evans/Udrih backcourt than it does the addition of Andres Nocioni and Spencer Hawes to the starting line-up.

Star-divide

The starting line-up featuring Sean May and Desmond Mason was bad. According to 82games.com, over 31 minutes the Evans-Martin-Mason-May-Thompson line-up was a -19. Awful. Conversely, over 31 minutes the Evans-Martin-Nocioni-Thompson-Hawes line-up was a +1, which is pretty damn good (considering the age of that unit). Evans is the point guard in both line-ups (which happen to be the two most frequently used line-ups so far this season -- a Martin-less line-up will soon overtake them). The contrast is in the small forward and center, and when you look at the total individual production of Mason and May when compared to Nocioni and Hawes, it's easy to see why the Kings are better off now.

Of course, if success is more attributable to the additions of Nocioni and Hawes than the addition of Udrih, then the Udrih-Evans-Nocioni-Thompson-Hawes line-up will have performed worse than the best Martin line-up, right? Right: the current starting five is a -3 over 30 minutes of play. Evans-Martin has been better than Udrih-Evans, which tells me that a) Kevin Martin is better than Beno Udrih, which is obviously noncontroversial, and b) if Evans is so much more comfortable as a two-guard, the difference is not enough to make up for the fact that Martin is so superior to any non-Evans Kings point guard.

So that's where we are, or rather where we will be come January, when Martin returns. The best Kings backcourt features Evans as a point guard. If you don't believe he can do it, you will likely have January, February, March and April to convince everyone else. In the meantime, I suggest you pay attention to just how much Evans continues to run the offense, and how good he can be in that role.

3 recs  |  Comment 199 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Can't we stick with things like:

Hawes is clearly not a democrat.

Kenny Thomas is clearly not an actual dog.

Kayte Christensen is clearly not interested in Aykis.

JT is clearly not going to release a rap album.

Sergio is clearly not earning minutes.

Donté is clearly not headed to Reno.

Peaches is clearly not going to win a Pulitzer.

The draft lottery has reinforced my belief that there are not enough bad words in the English language.

by LeaguePassAddict on Nov 13, 2009 7:17 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

A solid stance, Zil. But we've won 3 games in a row with the "other" line up.

There’s no stat here that’s going to make me not believe my own eyes as far as what I see on the court. Well, unless there’s a Kings performance statistic from an alternate universe where the Kevin Martin injury never happened.

Evans is best when he’s playing psuedo-combo guard (yeah, I just made that up). It’s kind of like the way that Bandon Roy and D-Wade play most efficiently. I really really really do hope Coach W conjures up an offensive scheme to make Tyreke and Kevin work to the Kings’ advantage when they’re on the same floor together. I want it to work…I really do. I also have no problem saying that it would be interesting to see the offense go through Tyreke first, then Kevin second…just to see. It has to be tried first before it becomes gospel of course.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 13, 2009 7:17 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Or perhaps...

…folks should just kick back and enjoy the fact that our boys are now enjoying the sweet, sweet prospect of achieving the lofty status of sheer mediocrity, rather than being doomed from the outset of the season to Grizzly-like suckitude.

Just a thought…

by SierraSpartan on Nov 13, 2009 7:19 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for clearing this up

I’ve been defending Speed so much it’s ridiculous. It takes more than 8 games to determine whether or not a player can succeed at the point. Well, unless that player is Cisco.

Dip til I rip

http://reclaimingthetitle.wordpress.com

by Muff209 on Nov 13, 2009 7:28 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

"Well, unless that player is Cisco."

May I humbly add Quincy Douby and Orien Greene to the list?

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Nov 13, 2009 7:32 AM PST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

And Jerome James

What's the past tense for "scam?" Is it "scrumped?"

by swoosh91 on Nov 13, 2009 9:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I could have bought an Artest Kings jersey

for $10 last night at Arco. I’m a big man, but a 3X would have been more like a dress.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 9:05 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Douby was released yesterday.

This may be the end of his NBA career.

Europe, here I come!

by nothingbutnet on Nov 13, 2009 10:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice, Ziller. Clear up those misconceptions. Evans can really, really handle the ball.

by Vic De Zen on Nov 13, 2009 8:00 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Faster!

He just needs to pass ahead more and get the team into their offense sooner…especially have made baskets.

Positions only matter on defense. As long as he can stay with his man on the other end of the floor, he can handle the ball well enough to be the PG on offense. I think the offense looks better with he and Udrih in the back court because they are both distributers. It seems like Evans is moving better without the ball on offense when he is paired with Beno…the whole team for that matter.

I feel like the team was kind of watching too much when Martin had the ball on offense at times. He has a lot of offensive moves. They were probably trying to keep there spacing right so Martin has room to operate.

by markdog333 on Nov 13, 2009 8:06 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

especially after made baskets

by markdog333 on Nov 13, 2009 8:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd say

You don’t have enough data to draw any meaningful conclusions, and in any case, the difference between the Udrih and Martin lineups (-3 compared to plus 1) falls within the margin of error.

Besides adding Nocioni and Hawes to the starting lineup, the Kings bench – particularly Casspi and Donte – has been phenomenal. We have been winning the second and third quarters, and the second quarter in particular is generally a bench-driven affair.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 13, 2009 8:07 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

right

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Nov 13, 2009 10:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mason and May versus Nocioni and Hawes

Clearly there is a big difference in these starting line ups. What we don’t have data on is this change of line up WITH Martin on the floor. Once we have that going on we can really see the difference.

I imagine that if we had the change to Hawes and Nocioni with Martin still on the floor that we would be doing even better. Martin is such a deadly shooter and the need to double either him or Evans is clearly an advantage over Beno who merits few doubles.

Beno is playing much better, but he is no Martin.

by MustangMBS on Nov 13, 2009 8:19 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Sorry

I sneezed and hit the “Go” button. Damn you mobile.

by furious.d on Nov 13, 2009 8:29 AM PST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

This controversy should be expected

The Kings are not a conventional team. How many times this season have we seen three or four wings on the court at once? or our PF initiate a fast break? or our SF stretch PF run out in front of all other defenders on a fast break and throw down open court dunks? The Kings are one of the youngest teams in the league and are already well above average in offensive production, Reke leads the team in assists, and our PF is third. The problem is if Sacramento has consistent success with out a conventional PG running the offense it will fly in the face of conventional wisdom, and the argument that Reke isn’t a “real” PG will have to give way to the bigger discussion about how much offensive success relies on how an offensive scheme is utilizing the talent that executes it rather than making talent play within historically successful schemes. Case in point, Reke has been much more efficient and productive in the last few games. The easy factor to point out is that Speed has been out during that time period and that Beno (the PG of last year) is back on the court, ergo Reke at the 2 with an offensive initiator makes Reke and the rest of the team more productive. But another factor that is much more difficult to quantify is that the other players on the court have also increased their efficiency by doing what they do best. Example: we have a pretty agile squad and in the last few games when Reke has the ball you can see them moving around a lot more without the ball. This has made it much more difficult for defenses to hunker down in the paint and wait for Reke to drive. Is this a product of a more “conventional line-up?” I’m not so certain.

by BrooklynFan on Nov 13, 2009 8:22 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Yep. I hope the team does more of the same when Kevin gets back.

Example: we have a pretty agile squad and in the last few games when Reke has the ball you can see them moving around a lot more without the ball.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 13, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Udrih

Plus 11.1 to lead the Kings. According to these stats from 82games, the five most effective Kings are, in order, Udrih, Udoka, Casspi, Thompson and Greene.

I’d be curious to see how that lineup would do. It kind of goes back to the comment about the play of the bench because Udoka, Casspi and Greene have all played very well.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 13, 2009 8:25 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Nice work

but I agree with coolcat that the samples are too small.

I don’t think Kevin and Tyreke would have trouble co-existing, but we won’t know until Tyreke has become more comfortable with the NBA game and he plays a fair amount with Kevin.

We’ve played better for a number of reasons:

1) Evans grows a little every game, yes he’s actually better now than he was in the first couple games, which is to be expected.

2) Sean May and Desmond Mason were disasters. Spencer, Udoka, Nocioni and Beno have all stepped up, and the young guys have had some good minutes.

3) Utah on the road is very impressive, but they are not going well. OKC at home is a solid win against a young team, and the other two wins were over really bad teams at home. We don’t have to apologize for any of the wins, and I’m excited like everyone else, but there have been some winnable games.

With regard to Tyreke running the offense, at times he has held the ball too much, but have you guys noticed at times it takes us a long time to start the offensive set?

It seems to me, a lot of times, the guard brings the ball up, and then waits, and waits…and finally one of the bigs will come up to set a screen, or away from the ball people will get into motion and the offense will start. It seems there are a few seconds of indecision at times, before the guard can do anything to start the offense. Its hard to blame Beno or Evans for that, if they are waiting for everyone else to get where they are supposed to be to start the play.

Professional Hyperbole Slayer

by ForThree on Nov 13, 2009 8:52 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I think the biggest problem so far on offense has been taking too long to get into the sets. Both Reke and Beno are guilty of this, and even Kevin was guilty when he was playing the first couple games. I’m sure is something the coaches are keeping in mind.

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 9:21 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

PW Interview

PW said that was a problem they were going to address in one of the last post game interviews. Yep, you guys are right on target.

by MustangMBS on Nov 13, 2009 9:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Why are you comparing Martin to Beno?

Beno is a true pt. who facilitates the offense, gets players involved. Seems you should be comparing 2s, since that is where Martin and Evans both naturally fit.
Both provide offense, but with Evans you get slashing and passing, GREAT defense and free throws. With Martin you get great shooting and free throws—very little else.
That to me is the big difference in our winning line-ups: Yes, Noce is a factor, but with he and Evans together at 2,3 you have a solid defensive core to build around.
And let’s face it, our defense has been the huge factor combined with better team shooting.
(And I would definitely not say that Hawes has been a huge factor—though he seems to be improving).
But then again, what do I know—Im not using stats—just what my eyes tell me.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 9:18 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Eh... 'a true pt.'

Beno is not a true PG. He is more of an SG who CAN play PG. Kind of a tweener. He is playing better, thankfully, but I would still not have him over a lot of other players. The only true PG on this team is Sergio.

And, the comparison is the line up. Evans and Martin versus Evans and Beno as starting line up. Evans plays better as Point Guard rather than Shooting Guard. He doesn’t shoot well enough. That is why Martin is a better 2 and why Evans is a better 1.

by MustangMBS on Nov 13, 2009 9:41 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Beno is def. a true point in that he looks to pass first

and facilitate the offense. The spacing seems so much better when he and Evans are in the starting line up (especially when Beno is quickly getting into offense and hitting that midrange j)
And right now, I think Evans plays better as 2—his shooting is not awful and he can get to the rim at will, but its his D that is supreme—and its a crucial position to guard.

As point, he dribbles too much, starts offense too slowly, and has been more prone to TOs.

And this debate is not going away. Can you imagine when Martin comes back, if they go on a losing jag? Will really heat up then.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 10:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I sorta agree. I think Evans is a better 1.5. Is there such position?

This hybrid-crazy offense that Coach W is doing really makes it difficult to see who’s playing what position at any given possession. Having Udoka bring up the ball only made matters worse…in a good way. :)

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 13, 2009 4:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I like how we are having arguments

on why we are winning games.

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 9:39 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

We are not arguing

I refuse to argue, no way, don’t try to make me argue!
:)

by MustangMBS on Nov 13, 2009 9:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I still don't buy it

I just don’t think Evans will ever be efficient as a full-time PG. Although I’m definitely coming around to the idea that the Kings don’t necessarily need a pure PG to run the offense full-time.

by Charlieb on Nov 13, 2009 9:56 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

not many teams have a true PG

Most teams have score-first combo guards playing that position. The only difference is that ours is big enough to be a legitamate SG.

by markdog333 on Nov 13, 2009 1:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I totally agree with this

During halftime of the Thunder game the NBA TV guys were doing a fantasy basketball thing and mentioned that “No matter what the Kings think, Evans is way better as an off guard!!” To which I thought, “How would you know? He still hasn’t played off-guard this season!”
Evans and Beno are both playing point. Evans had 8 assists and 5 TOs against the Thunder. That doesn’t happen with a guy that isn’t handling the ball a lot.
I think the main reason the Kings have been more successful is just more time in Westphal’s system and more time for Tyreke to get comfortable with the NBA game. We have also had some relatively easy opponents. That Jazz in Utah should be a difficult game but they aren’t exactly dominating so far this season.

The NBA: "Where 27 free throws happens"

by lodisacfan on Nov 13, 2009 9:58 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Easy games?

none of these games are supposed to be easy. Let’s not forget we were a 17 win team last year & very few if not none were “easy” wins. Something is good is going on here nlet’s just roll with it. Most likely if we are floating around .500 when Kevin gets back P-dub will bring Kev off the bench in a 6th man roll at first anyway & Kevin will accept it cuz he is a class guy. Probobly until he drops 40 off the bench in a Kings win.

by allbenji's on Nov 13, 2009 2:09 PM PST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Its sooooooo early to worry about this

I know its because thats how he was viewed in the draft but could we get some perspective please?
Almost ANY young PG is going to have TO problems at first and JT and others have been costing him a few easy assists lately.
Give it time, his problems are mostly about not moving the ball upcourt quickly enough and/or holding it too long. I’m confidant that those things will improve with experience. He just needs to really learn that players on this level are a lot lot better than those he played at the Major college level.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Nov 13, 2009 10:21 AM PST reply actions   3 recs

Oh - and the 'Better without Kevin Martin' stuff is just crap

Refuse left over from a few bad seasons and bad teams. No Team, none, is better without the most efficient scoring SG in the league off the floor.
Now, has / will this help Tyreke’s development some? I think a few games (10 or so) would have been a good argument that it allows him to be more assertive, find his game. Over two months? Nope. The Kid and the team will be exhuasted trying to pick up for KM in another month (or less) and will be thrilled to have him back.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Nov 13, 2009 10:31 AM PST reply actions   4 recs

You should've combine both of those posts

to make one great rec’d comment. Well said lttg

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 10:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

True but I still wonder how well the Kings would do if Kevin were the number 2 scoring option behind Tyreke.

We’ll definitely score no matter who the number 1 option is regardless. But I would like to see how it works etc…

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 13, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

think of Evans as a stronger Arenas

Arenas isn’t necessarily a classical point guard. But he seems to be a smart player, has the skills and IQ to run the offense but also score when he has to.

Another example of a player with Evans size and skills would be Chauncey Billups. Billups had similar criticisms when he was younger.

Baron Davis is not as athletic as Evans, but he has similar size and abilities. At his best he is a big guard who bullies larger opponents with his speed and smaller players with his strength. He can score and run the offense. Evans has a very similar offensive game.

Dwayne Wade isn’t listed as the point guard but I guarantee if you watch the Heat he handles the ball at least as much as Chalmers. If Evans had the explosiveness of Wade I don’t think anyone would complain. Imagine Dwayne Wade and Kevin Martin.

Anyone of those examples could play the “point” and I am sure they would all love to share a backcourt with Kevin Martin. And there is no doubt they would pick Martin over Udrih.

Also, since when did Udrih become a true point. He is a bigger, less skilled Mike Bibby. Bibby can run an offense, but he was best when he was coming of screens off of the ball and shooting. Doug Christie handled the ball a lot instead of Bibby.

So think of it this way: Evans is a bigger, faster, stronger, Doug Christie with better handles, and Martin is a taller quicker Mike Bibby who can drive and get fouled more. What the hell is the complaint?

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 10:36 AM PST via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Agree that KMart is the problem stuff is crap!

If we recall the pre-season (yes, it’s only preseason) we could all see the potential domination of Evans/Martin backcourt. Have we forgotten the matchup havoc this tandem creates? Beno/Evans simply cannot compare, and the potential is not as great. Plus, Martin is better than Beno on D.

by amonk81 on Nov 13, 2009 10:40 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I got one example of that

Tonight, if Kevin and Reke were starting. Who is Aroon Brooks going to guard without being totally abused? If they even think about putting Ariza on Reke and Battier on Kevin, then Brooks has to handle Nocioni.

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 10:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

um...i think its more like Nocioni has to handle Brooks

It’s already tough for the fastest point guards in the league to guard Brooks.

by ucla06 on Nov 13, 2009 2:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Matchups on offense don't have to be same for defense

Either Kevin or Reke would be on Brooks and though that would be a mismatchj in terms of speed, the Kings would still hold a bigger advatange on the other end.

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 2:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Another thing that is worth exploring is types of scoring:

Its not just about numbers. The Kings haven’t had a scorer who could finish in crunch time or create when the game is on the line in a lonnnnnng damn time. Evans is becoming that player.
I would rather have 20-27 points from him, a well-rounded stat line, and a win, then 50 from K. Mart and a loss because the Kings couldn’t score at the crucial times of the game. Coach has simply found that Beno makes smarter decisions with the ball down the stretch than allowing Evans to force it himself.
Who knows, maybe Kmart and Evans start games, and Beno/Evans finish them?

Are the Kings better with Martin on the team? Of course. But Im still not sold on Martin- Evans backcourt working in the long run and think its too premature for anyone to assume that, solely based on Martin’s scoring efficiency. Every team needs a quarterback, not two guys always looking to score first, which are Evans and Martin’s true personalities: They are scorers first, playmakers second (and in Martin’s case, not at all).

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 10:46 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

If we were talking about

Monta Ellis fitting in, or Stepehn Jackson changing his game for the benefit of the team I’d understand. But we are talking about Kevin Martin; his ego is as small as his muscles (look I can make stupid jokes about his frame too). I have no doubt that Kevin can mold his game to fit better with Reke. Kevin’s being used to HAVING to take the shots and dominate the ball because of the lack of talent last year, but now that we have other legit options so he can concentrate in runnig through screens and cutting and hitting shots.

Many have mention this before but don’t forget Martin emerged as an NBA player and was as effective playing with Bibby and Artest (who are used to having the ball in their hands a lot). You want to finish games with Beno and Reke allowing the opposite D to double Reke and leaving Beno open? Let me guess, Kevin is not clutch, right?

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 10:54 AM PST up reply actions   3 recs

Rec'd
But we are talking about Kevin Martin; his ego is as small as his muscles (look I can make stupid jokes about his frame too).
Kevin’s being used to HAVING to take the shots

by MustangMBS on Nov 13, 2009 10:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

every team needs a quarterback

But not all quarterbacks play exactly the same or are successful in all the same type of offenses.

Having a quarterback who can pass AND run but also has the option to hand off to a really good running back is not a bad situation.

And it isn’t always bad to have more than one good quarterback or more than one good running back. That is why the Wildcat was invented.

So maybe it isn’t so bad to have SEVERAL players that can run an offense, score, handle and dribble. After all, isn’t that what basketball is about?

The evidence that Evans and Martin cannot play together is based on a limited amount of games. Usually it takes a few months to really assess these situations. We are in rebuild mode, let’s try all our options and consider them carefully before making rash assumtions.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 11:06 AM PST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I agree but in a different sense on the premise "every team needs a quaterback"

The purpose on offense is to get the ball in the basket. It is easier to do in the frontcout so there are backcourt players to bring the ball up – to break down the defense and initiate the offense. Any player with handles enough to get the offense going will do. In the case of the Kings, two players will do. (or do-do?).

Beno can bring the ball up – but he is not a creator. I have trouble calling him a facilitator. To me, he is a guy on offense that starts the offense because he has the ball. If he can’t drive or dribble for the stop n’ pop, he passes it around or runs the play to the post that Coach calls for. Beno controls the ball alot, when he gets to DribbleDribbleBeno mode, too much.
Tyreke is different. He is a tempo player. He demands coverage. He looks to score a lot, arguably too much, but he creates passing situations on his own. Once he understands running a team offense he will facilitate the offense more.
To further contrast – Sergio is nothing but a creator, it is his major failing. He demands little coverage and looks to pass exclusively.

Lastly, the ol’ plus/minus (best said with a French accent – ploo- me nu), conveniently sidesteps the defense that Tyreke supplies. Points are nice for the plus – but holding the opponent defensively strengthens that advantage. Are the Kings a better defensive unit with Evans/Martin, Evans/Udrih, Martin/Udrih ?

by betweentheeyes on Nov 13, 2009 12:48 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

exactly what i tried to say but couldn't

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

it does take into account defense

it is the difference between the points you score and the points your opponent score.

by markdog333 on Nov 13, 2009 1:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yes, it does, but my point is: are we here on StR taking that into account?

the Spurs have a good differential even if they are among the lowest scoring teams in the League. You can try the Paul Westhead/Don Nelson/Mike D’Antoni approach by being an offensive juggernaut, or you can lock down defend.

Plus/Minus has to take into account wins and losses. Team plus/minus is ultimately defined by score differential. To clarify my question: which Evans/Martin/Udrih combo provides the best defense?

by betweentheeyes on Nov 13, 2009 2:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

of all the lineups with over 30 mins a game

Evans Martin Nocioni Thompson Hawes is the only one that is a +. And that is only of +1.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

the highest was +6 for 8.5 minutes

that had Sergio Casspi Greene Thompson Hawes

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 3:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

our current starting lineup is actually +10

Udrih Evans Nocioni THompson Hawes

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 3:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You better get ready

to throw a consistent 15-20 minutes a night of Ime Udoka into that mix.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 9:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I see what you're saying, VB.

I agree that Evans is the better play maker and can score from more angles than Kevin. I’m really eager to see how the offense works when Kevin gets back. I’m going to assume that we’ll continue our winning ways for the next seven weeks (I know I know…wishful thinking). Hopefully, the Kings will just end up being more powerful when Martin and Cisco return. Still wish we could add one more bruising big to our squad.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 13, 2009 4:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Duh!

The problem is not Martin, he and Evans will be superb together, The problem was that the Evans Martin Noc/Mason lineup had 1 BH. Udrih Evans Martin/Noc has 2. Thats all it is. I said before Pre-season that when Evans was on the floor he should be paired with Cisco, so there would be 2 ball handlers (And I needn’t insert here, but I will, that all my hoop observations are 100% not Stinky). Beno fulfills that role.
Thats it. Martin and Evans are perfect compliments to each other, not a duplicate weakness between the 2. Both will help the other flourish. We just need the right 3rd guy to go with them.
Stay calm, back away from the reefer, all is good.

by ElRonToro on Nov 13, 2009 10:54 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd

Due to laughing my ass off!

by MustangMBS on Nov 13, 2009 11:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Only time will tell .....

But it never ceases to amaze me how the people here think they know the game better than the vast majority of players and NBA experts who agree that Evans is best utilized as a 2 and that the Martin/Evans backcourt is gonna be an issue in the future.

These people aren’t idiots or armchair fans, and I can see their point.
The only thing I see here are the usual diehard Martin fanatics defending him to the bitter end.

But whatever, Im happy with whatever backcourt gets us wins. Right now, its Beno and Evans and Im liking it.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 11:05 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

your right, we should just do what the media says

Lay down and be the worst team in the league for another 5 years, instead of trying to work with what we HAVE, play as a TEAM, and try to WIN.

Remember, the experts thought Rubio would be picked #2 and would be a superstar. I would pick 15 or 20 other players over Rubio.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 11:12 AM PST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

True. I argued vs. people here for Evans over Rubio from the very beginning.

But the expert opinion was not as clear a consensus as the Evans at 2 thing.

And for the record, working in journalism myself, I def. don’t take everything the media says as true, but I do tend to give weight to the players’ opinions—especially when they all agree.
(And I have found people to be irrationally attached to K. Mart here like he was their savior or long, lost lover).

We’ll see what happens.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 11:24 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That's true

People here use no facts whatsoever to back up their opinions about Kevin. We are irrational and can’t seem to use any evidence or statistics to eve rprove any of our points.

Here’s your post:

The Kings haven’t had a scorer who could finish in crunch time or create when the game is on the line in a lonnnnnng damn time. Evans is becoming that player.
I would rather have 20-27 points from him, a well-rounded stat line, and a win, then 50 from K. Mart and a loss because the Kings couldn’t score at the crucial times of the game. Coach has simply found that Beno makes smarter decisions with the ball down the stretch than allowing Evans to force it himself.
Who knows, maybe Kmart and Evans start games, and Beno/Evans finish them?

Are the Kings better with Martin on the team? Of course. But Im still not sold on Martin- Evans backcourt working in the long run and think its too premature for anyone to assume that, solely based on Martin’s scoring efficiency. Every team needs a quarterback, not two guys always looking to score first, which are Evans and Martin’s true personalities: They are scorers first, playmakers second (and in Martin’s case, not at all).

Aside from the Kings not having a consistent go-to-guy for a past couple years, where are the facts that support your argument?

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 11:29 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I dont have enough time to dig through stats: I just watch the games

and give my opinions. By “fanatic,” I was referring to the fact that people get so emotional
whenever someone expresses criticism of Martin. They do constantly show his efficiency numbers, we all get that.
Clearly, Im not a firm believer that stats provide the whole story, that should be obvious.
Just comes from watching basketball for 30 years.

And I consider myself a Kings fanatic as well, maybe not as much as the endlessly juggling stat people here, though. But certainly no fairweather fan (as I was a paying customer during the Mitch Richmond days of horror).

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 11:39 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

so what your saying is you just not a fan of Martin

and are looking for way to get rid of him, rather than see how he can help the team win, especially now that we have a potenial go-to-guy, playmaker, and lockdown defender to help him in the backcourt?

so, we should just waive Kevin Martin? ok. good plan.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 11:41 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nope, Im saying that I have concerns about them as a future backcourt.

Same as the players, and all the commentators Ive heard. Simple as that.

Some teams have their two best players at the same position. Some keep them, some don’t. I don’t know what we should do yet as they have not played together long enough to even see if it might work.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 11:46 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

name a team with their 2 best players at the same position

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

SA is close - but no

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Nov 13, 2009 2:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Golden State (everyone is a SG), Philadelphia (AI and Young), Utah (well, second-best, but Boozer-Okur-Milsapp play the same position), Cleaveland (two PGs, two Cs and Lebron), Orlando had Turkgolu-Lewis, LA with Odom-Pau-Bynum all possible PFs, Indiana with Granger/Dunleavy, what about Houston?, Love-Jefferson,

GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims

by iashwash on Nov 13, 2009 6:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

2 best players

not 2 of their better players

and Love- Jefferson do not play the same position.

by betweentheeyes on Nov 13, 2009 6:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

oh yeah they do

GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims

by iashwash on Nov 13, 2009 6:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I will give you Duncan-Robinson

and Sampson-Olajawon and Chamberlain-Thurmond and Bird-McHale, but Jefferson is a 5 – always has been always will be and Love is a 4 (more of a 3’s outside game, but a four). 4 is not 5.

by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 3:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You keep ignoring Hawes & Thompson in the playmaker category

Both guys are probably the best 2 passers the Kings have. Doesn’t that hold any weight with you?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 12:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I get that but this is not just about stats

It’s about supporting you argument with facts. We all have opinions and that should be respected. But if you come up with something that someone else can argue about with tangible facts then you can’t expect your opinion to hold and not be discussed and even attacked.

Kevin has played with ball dominant players before, that’s a fact. Kevin has been the second and third option for this team before, that’s a fact. Kevin has a very small (if at all) ego, that’s a fact. These things lead me to believe that when he comes back he could possibly make it work alongside Reke. It’s not a certainty, but it COULD work. Nothing you have said so far is going to convince anyone otherwise.

Now someone else could come in and take over and show me different stuff, that’s great. But you haven’t proven anything by just writing your opinions down about how much you don’t like most of Kevin’s game.

I think your concern about him are warranted sometimes, but if it’s just your opinion and you have nothing to back it up with aside from “I watch the games” then expect more arguments.

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 11:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Kevin doesn't need to score 50 a game

and doesn’t want to do that and lose. I am pretty sure Kev can and will do whatever it takes to win. I haven’t met the guy though, so who knows. Maybe he is an evil little 2 guards who is only out there trying to make himself look good so he can finally make an All-Star game and get shoe endorsement deals.

Kevin Martin as a taller Allen Iverson? Possible. Not likely, however.

I see the upside of Evans and Martin as similar to Billups and Hamilton, but maybe even more skilled and versatile. If Spence can be our Rasheed and JT our Wallace, Omri or Greene be our Tayshaun, and everyone can play as a team, then maybe we can win some games.

I am in no way saying that this team now will go on to win a championship. But with the right trust and development of our young guys, including Tyreke, Martin, and even Beno, then we might be on our way out of this rebuild.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 11:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So at the end of the year, since facts and stats are so important, we can

just look back at the Kings numbers/winning percentages with and without Martin and maybe that will tell us something about whether they play better as a team with him on the floor? Seems so easy.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 11:58 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It'd be easy because it doesn't involve thinking

so it should work for you. You seem to be doing fine in that area.

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 12:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But there are stats and facts! C'mon.

Can you please back your zingers up with facts, too?

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 12:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure

It’s ok though, the concept of backing up your opinions is a bit tough to comprehend sometimes. Let me suggest a good site for you where you would find much better, much smarter definitely, people: www.sacbee.com/kings. Just scroll down to the comment section after any article and have at it. You should fir right in.

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 12:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

VirginiaBlue - advice you didn't ask for -

you have a prolific disdain for both Martin and Hawes on this Kings team. It has exceeded sensibility as your arguments randomly support and refute themselves (Media Experts say Evans should play the 2, and yet you dismiss any positive stats on Martin because “I dont have enough time to dig through stats: I just watch the games and give my opinion”). You use the term – “time will tell” but want to forego trying prospectively, as just two examples.

Perhaps if you provide your unpopular view with consistency, but not constantly it would have more credence. Further, disparing remarks get stale quickly – like jokes, follow the rule of 3.

by betweentheeyes on Nov 13, 2009 1:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I actually like Hawes and think he is still becoming a player.

With Martin’s time in league I don’t think he’s going to change that drastically, particularly on defense, which is where he bothers me the most. Not so much from lack of trying, but he’s a division II body who is just to easy to shed from my point of view.

I dont refute Martin’s stats—I think he’s a great offensive player. I do think he’s the rare player where stats can really be deceiving though.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 5:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Last year I would have said Mello will never play D

Martin is a light weight, so it will be tougher on him. But, he has speed & likes to run, it’s not a physical problem that keeps him from being a good defender. It’s the mental.

You can watch him lose his man or help when no help is needed. Sometimes he’s the only person close enough to give help, and you can see him freeze trying to decide whether to leave his man who’s in the corner or try and get betweeen the ball and the rim. Two seconds later he’s still standing in the same place and the layup is going in the basket.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Nov 13, 2009 6:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you haven't waited until the end of the year

you are saying 8 games into the season that we are screwed because Evans and Martin can’t play together, and we need to let Udrih play with Evans instead.

8 games in.

Just hold your horses back until we have a complete roster healthy for over a month, and then let’s start villifying.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

also, you seem to be ignoring the main premise of Ziller's post

which is that Hawes and Nocioni are better an May and Mason.

Obviously that isn’t true. Udrih could have made May and Mason better players. right?

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh I def. agree with that. Much better with Noce and Hawes.

Just wasn’t sure I can agree with abandoning the concept of a true point guard starting on a basketball team.
And I originally was pointing out that I like Evans at 2 better than Kevin because he’s a much more well-rounded player—or is becoming one.
I enjoy defense because it makes good teams, in my experience. And I like Evans and Noce together, and think Hawes and Thompson are getting good too.
Both Martin and Udrih are weak defenders, but at least Udrih can pass.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 12:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually

Based on, again, a small sample size, Martin seemed to be doing a good job at addressing his deficiencies before he went down.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 13, 2009 1:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

TO ADD: There are also lots of valid arguments the other way

These support a position closer to Ed and I. Like the fact that Martin spreads the floor and teams can’t leave him to double Evans in the paint. Evans was always getting doubled with Mason in and that in the end was why he had to go. Udoka is a much better option cause he is a shooting threat.

Having a shooter like Martin paired with Evans means that he gets more room inside. Once Martin is back, Hawes starts hitting 3s, and Garcia is back at the 3 point line this is going to be huge. Evans will be able to drive and kick all day long.

You don’t need a PG to be your main ball distributor. Vlade did that pretty damn well. What about Lebron? Should he not be driving and kicking the ball out?

There are lots of reasons that support an Evans and Martin backcourt and that go against your case Virginia. Just because you don’t like a player doesn’t mean you should just ignore them. Otherwise, it is you being a fanatic and unreasonable.

by MustangMBS on Nov 13, 2009 11:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We actually had TWO non-scoring threats

Mason and May on the floor those first games.
Folks here (me included) were screaming that the line-up wasn’t capable of being successful because they were both small And didn’t spread the floor (and May couldn’t defend).
I think that argument still holds. It wasn’t KM going out that led to some success – it was putting more scoring threats in the starting 5.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Nov 13, 2009 2:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Or a better balanced starting 5 maybe Lttg?

What JT, Spence, Noc, Evans & Beno do as a group wouldn’t be that different than what that same group minus Beno and adding Martin would do.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 2:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

(And I have found people to be irrationally attached to K. Mart here like he was their savior or long, lost lover).

Yep VB. I plan on boning K-Mart tomorrow to show my eternal horniness of him.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 12:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you trying to say I don't have a 1000 mile dick?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 12:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

if by miles you mean nonmeters

then that is what I have heard, yes

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

nanometers, excuse me

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well nanometers rolls off the tongue a bit differently than miles

But, that’s what I probably meant.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 12:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No I didn't

What’s angstroms?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't care how small

Keep that thing away from my tongue…. ewww

by MustangMBS on Nov 13, 2009 1:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Just to be clear

Pookey, you said that a small dick rolls of your tongue easier than a big one. While I don’t question your expertise hear… Let’s please stick to the basketball. Not gross stuff like that.

by MustangMBS on Nov 13, 2009 1:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well I suppose I should make it clear that it was a joke

as I have no expertise or interest in actually performing said joke.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

but you said....

btw, 10 nanometers = 1 angstrom and while nanometers are abbreviated nm, angstroms have this very cool A with circle on top, kind of like the Anaheim Angels logo. So in dweeb terms, it is heckacool to sport the Ã….
Go nerds! Go Kings! Go Nads!

by betweentheeyes on Nov 13, 2009 2:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

bte

Fuck the Angels. That is all.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 3:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

its not worth it pook

street walking will get you no where fast, check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3omQikQYmgY

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The media is full of idiots

“Working in journalism” means you can craft a sentence…but YOU are proof that it doesn’t guarantee you know even the tiniest bit more than anyone else (and that’s me trying to be kind).

So all the player’s agree that an Evans/Martin backcourt is not going to work. Can you show proof of your work here?

Have you given any weight to the fact that Geoff Petrie and his crew think Evans and Martin will work in the same backcourt? Or do they not qualify as “NBA experts”?

Desmond Mason - Untied the balloon in Colorado, forged Obama's birth certificate, and ruined the careers of Omri Casspi and Tyreke Evans.

by otis29 on Nov 13, 2009 12:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Geoff Petrie obviously only drafts players and asks them to do things they can't so that the Maloofs will not resign him

He is sick and tired of their gravelly voices grating his ears: “Hey, Geoff, whaddya think about Reggie Theus?”

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:12 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

oooh, Ice with the stab.

I think you may be the stalactite on Casspi’s Fiddler on the Maloof. Rec’d

by betweentheeyes on Nov 13, 2009 2:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I said everyone Ive heard or read has been skeptical, as am I, that it can work in the long haul.

And the fact that everyone assumes I want to ditch, or “waive” Martin is proof of the crazy Martin-bone love I mentioned. I never said any such thing. Nobody is gonna take your lover away, it’s OK.

Oh. And no I didnt think about Petrie and the Kings organization since their job is to sell tickets and put a positive face on every move they make. Of course it has to work for them.
As I said, only time will tell and we’ll see who was right.
Just like the Evans/Rubio thing. People here cried long and hard for the Spanish sensation. Maybe when he comes to the league, they’ll be proven right, but I think Evans will be an all-star by that time.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 12:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mmmmmm
it never ceases to amaze me how the people here think they know the game better than the vast majority of players and NBA experts who agree that Evans is best utilized as a 2 and that the Martin/Evans backcourt is gonna be an issue in the future

“Everyone I’ve heard or read”?

The future begins now...

by edm7 on Nov 13, 2009 12:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Generalizations FTW

This is why I can’t take you seriously – we are all a bunch of Martin lovers…we all wanted to draft Rubio instead of Evans. What a bunch of b.s.

I’m going to guess your area of expertise in “journalism” is probably for an organization similar to TMZ or Deadspin. You don’ t really need any facts to back up your inanities, you just need to spit out the sentences in the right order…am I close?

Desmond Mason - Untied the balloon in Colorado, forged Obama's birth certificate, and ruined the careers of Omri Casspi and Tyreke Evans.

by otis29 on Nov 13, 2009 12:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

your original post was that we should consider Evans as a 2

because all Martin does is shoot, because Evans can score and PASS, and Beno is a true point guard.

Beno Udrih is a true point guard? And the key to our success?

you also said Evans and Noc are a defensive core to build around. I bet out of all the players we have, Andres is the most likely to be traded. He is aging. He is tough, but not a lockdown defender.

So, basically, all you want is for us to choose between the Kings 2 best players, Evans and Martin, because you think Beno is a true point guard, and Martin doesn’t contribute anything but scoring. Even though Martin’s averages of 30ppg, over 5 rpg, and his 2.6 apg are eerily similar to Kobe Bryant, the best 2 guard in the game now. Only Martin was averaging 3 points less.

The argument that Martin needs to distribute better and play defense has been going on for awhile. But his improvements have been seen. He actually does seem to be interested in defense this year. He does get rebounds. And if his teammates can improve, then I am sure his assists will go up. He is not taking away from anything the other players do.

Do Martin and Evans make their teammates better? I don’t see why they cant each individually help each other as well as Beno supposedly has helped Evans. Beno only gets one more assist per game than Martin. Beno averaged less than 5 assists last year as the starting point guard. I don’t see how you can argue Udrih as a prototypical point guard. He is playing better. But he is no John Stockton.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I find it funny that that people also forget the schedule for the first 5 games was far more difficult than the last 3 games

But, hey let’s not a detail like that get in the way of anything.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 12:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I didnt say he was great or good even He's playing well now and he's a true point.

especially as far as points go on the Kings. Sergio is a joke.
I didnt think it was controversial to argue that its important to have a point guard start on a basketball team who looks to pass first, facilitate the O.

But maybe Im too old school, or too focused on positions … this new NBA game is totally different, especially in the playoffs.

I personally think Kevin and Reke have the same scorer’s mentality.
Will it work and keep others involved? Maybe, who knows. As I said five times (note: not fact checked), only time will tell.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 1:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah, and I cant over stress enough that I dont give a shit

about offense. I like defense. And I think that Evans and Noce’s defense (and lets not forget Udoka) has been contagious to the rest of team.

I like to think that’s why we’re winning.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 1:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If you don't give a shit why argue about it then?

Obviously you care enough to argue what you feel are salient and worthwhile points.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not necessarily .... there are few Kings fans in VA. Could just be boredom.

I usually state an opinion and add that I have no stats, facts, whatever … just many years of watching every Kings game. That’s it. Sheer opinion and I’ve admitted in the past when I was wrong—which hasn’t been that often.
But in this case, thinking that Evans and Martin MIGHT not work in the long run … doesn’t seem like anything to take back yet. I’ll believe it when I see it on a consistent basis.
I enjoy reading the posts with all the stats—would love to see more about our defense; but its not gonna sway me much one way or another since my opinions are formed watching them play. And I know, around here, that gets you called all kinds of names but that’s also kind of fun.
Call it trolling if you must, but I give opinions to toss my two cents in, as a longtime Kings fan, not to hear a bunch of people whine or hurl insults. When they can prove Evans is a true point, or he and Martin work together best—Im all ears. Until then, its all conjecture.
I’m usually surprised my simple, supposedly “inane” statement of opinion provokes such angry responses (must be some validity in it).
Most people have a knee jerk reaction whenever I mention Martin because I’ve stated that I think he’s pretty one dimensional and prob should be a role player on the team we want to have. Not the team we have. But the one we want to have in the future. If they even keep him. And I dont consider Petrie stupid. It all depends on Evans’ development.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 4:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You have fun, we have fun, win-win

it not like i got hurt feelings or anything.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you got hurt feelings?

try this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zI3_pnUU3k

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 4:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. +100.

Watching the game is where everyone should gain most of their knowledge. I know more than a few coaches or ex-coaches that don’t even bother to mention stat-monkey numbers to prove their point.

They played, they coach – they know. It doesn’t take studying a million spreadsheets, stat-driven essays and figures to become a perceptive fan of the game.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 13, 2009 4:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You're entitled to your opinion

But for somebody who doesn’t give a shit you certainly don’t mind spreading your opinion in the same way repeatedly.

So, you don’t like Kevin Martin. Your loss.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 9:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed. No worries. I thought I was the only one here who loved the Evans pick.

I attracted some hateful comments in that draft thread but oh well. I forgot who called me “slick” but whatever.

Yep – we’ll see what happens. I hope we find a way to keep everyone involved when Kevin and Cisco get back.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 13, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And there you go

We are dissed and dismissed as fanatics without the ability to have perspective because we disagree with you. Which means that you really don’t want to hear anything contradicting your points. So, cool, I won’t point out the stats of KMart or reiterate the many points contradicting your own. Stuff that should give you pause and cause to reflect or perhaps even reconsider. Clearly, you aren’t interested.

by MustangMBS on Nov 13, 2009 11:13 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nope, you're right. I do have my previously stated opinion: It's too early to tell whether it will work.

Stats or no stats.
And I may like Kevin’s offense and him as a person, but I hate his weak defense, passing/playmaking, handles, etc—Im on record for that. Any of that changes, I’d have to reassess.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 11:30 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Kevin's weaknesses are complimented

By Tyreke’s potential strengths. We just haven’t had much opportunity to see how good that can be yet.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 11:34 AM PST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

VB

You’re too focused on positions…they are a very good match of styles together.Also, just because people have a job doesn’t make them an expert in what they do… I’ve offer my co-workers if you need evidence.

by ElRonToro on Nov 13, 2009 11:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

we are no longer in the era where positional basektball is the way to play

and we certainly don’t have many, if any, prototypical position players on our team. In fact, Kevin may be the only person on this team who can easily be labeled.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think people under appreciate

that easy points make for any easier game. What Martin does takes a lot of weight off of his teammates.

by ElRonToro on Nov 13, 2009 1:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I dont work in sports journalism and never said I was an expert.

I think its funny how fired up people get when you hint at anything involving a future devoid of Kevin Martin. And it’s really touching.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 1:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ok now you're just being a douche

and if you read you own post that I was responding to ,you were arguing how we ignore alll the experts who say Evans is a 2. In no way would I ever think you had the audacity to call yourself an expert.
If I was Grant and you were a caller this is where IDIOT! would be shouted and been correct.

by ElRonToro on Nov 13, 2009 1:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Its hard to keep track, my amateur opinions create so many responses.

but Its the people that hurl insults at other Kings fans that I think are really cool though.
They’re the funnest to see get mad, anyway …

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 4:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Its not having a differing opinion that anyone should have a problem with

its having fun making other people mad that makes a troll. Some people add interesting commentary to message boards. Some people are trolls.

Professional Hyperbole Slayer

by ForThree on Nov 13, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What is it with people like you?

You remind me a bit of Coolcat, version 1.0. Alternately decrying the lowbrow comments of the site savages such as myself, yet conveniently forgetting the snappy things you’ve written in the same fanpost.

For instance, you wrote this:

but Its the people that hurl insults at other Kings fans that I think are really cool though.
They’re the funnest to see get mad, anyway …
Yet I believe you also wrote this:
(And I have found people to be irrationally attached to K. Mart here like he was their savior or long, lost lover).
And this:
Nobody is gonna take your lover away, it’s OK.

Let’s not insult anyone’s intelligence by pretending you are above the fray, ok?

And there appears to be a running homophobic slant to your comments. Can we expect full on gay bashing from you at some point?

by otis29 on Nov 13, 2009 5:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

its ok otis, he's right,

StR is just a Kevin Martin fan site. That’s how i found it. I was looking for cute Kevin Martin pictures.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 5:16 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Was Kevin's body oiled or were they just natural?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 5:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

he is running away from you pookey

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 5:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Whew!

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 5:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Pleaz, that's not the same as calling people douches/idiots because I don't agree with them.

poking fun at people loving Kevin too much is not homophobic either; maybe hyperbolic.

One of my points originally was that, while I find stats interesting, I think they don’t tell the whole story. End of sentence. Some people can’t take that and prefer to hurl insults. I don’t post to get people mad, but once they do, what else is there to do but laugh at their emotional overreaction? If I’m so off-base just prove it and shut the fuck up and I will too.
But what I originally said here isn’t the kind of thing that can be proven yet since they havent played enough together—which is why I left a possibility that it MIGHT work against traditional PG notions——-so that makes all this talk is pointless and a little boring now. We’ll know better at the end of the season.

..

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 5:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I HATE YOU! I WISH YOU WEREN'T MY MOTHER! I WISH I WAS DEAD! WOULD THAT MAKE YOU HAPPY!

Oh. Um, NM.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 5:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You're a hypocrite.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 9:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If you listen to the general media

It’s clear that they don’t watch nearly as much Kings as you, I, or Ziller (who wrote an excellent post here)

The NBA: "Where 27 free throws happens"

by lodisacfan on Nov 13, 2009 12:47 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

I agree. My point (If I even remember now)

was that I think the players often know other players better than fans.
I don’t trust most of the commentators about Kings.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 4:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I pretty much had this exact argument with my best buddy the other night

BB: Kevin Martin better pack his bags.

Me: You’re crazy. I don’t even want to argue with you about this.

BB: Tyreke isn’t a point guard. Trade Martin for a big man.

Me: Have you been watching the games? ‘Reke has probably been handling the ball more than before K-Money’s injury.

BB: I don’t need to watch the games. The Beno-’Reke backcourt has been lighting-it-up and Beno is a point guard.

Me: Beno was playing just as good before the injury. He’s been great off the bench when we need him. You want Sergio as our backup PG? ‘Reke just took a few games to start figuring things out. When Martin gets back, the real domination begins. You’ll see.

BB: Nope. Trade him!

Now, if we could somehow trade Martin for Chris Paul…

"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.

by AnotherStupidSN on Nov 13, 2009 11:14 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

So who is the SG in that scenario?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We'd be trading a Martin/Reke backcourt for Paul/Reke

but if CP3 was our point guard, I could be our SG and it would still be entertaining.

"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.

by AnotherStupidSN on Nov 13, 2009 1:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Nah I doubt that

But it’s still funny you put it that way.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 2:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It'd definitely be entertaining

The NBA: "Where 27 free throws happens"

by lodisacfan on Nov 13, 2009 2:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Evans is pretty damn young to judge now

But he has played point for 5 years, through high school, and most of his one year at Memphis.

His weaknesses are well known: he is not a consistent jump shooter, he can get to the rim but doesn’t know how to finish well, and he likes to have the ball in his hand a little too much. But I don’t think that is much different from any POINT GUARD who has consistently been the best player and the leader of his team growing up.

Evans will develop. This team has the coaching to help him and the teammates to make up for what he lacks in the mean time. The fact that he has played well with Beno tells me that he is learning and adjusting to different situations.

Tyreke needs to improve for sure. All young point guards go through problems learning the position for their team. It isn’t going to hurt him to share with Beno now. And it may help him in the long run. But it in no way means that he is incapable of being the point guard of the future for the Kings, even if he struggles with that role a little now.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 11:30 AM PST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

The starting line-up featuring Sean May and Desmond Mason was bad. According to 82games.com, over 31 minutes the Evans-Martin-Mason-May-Thompson line-up was a -19. Awful.

I didn’t think Mason was that bad, but the fact that he couldn’t shoot meant teams would defend Evans differently. Having Udoka on the floor has given the Kings an extra shooter in the role of Mason, and for the same reason’s. Nocioni’s offense has been far better than Mason’s defense, and that’s the end game here.

If anything, credit the Kings for not attempting to make Mason work long term. It certainly helps any case from a visual standpoint with Udoka as both Mason and Udoka moved the ball, but Udoka has the outside threat going for him.

I think the biggest difference between Evans with Martin & Udrih is that Evans has attacked the basket relentlessly to be rewarded for it. Whatever happened between the Atlanta and Utah game, a lightbulb went on for Reke. He had not played that way in any game at any time (including the New Orleans game).

So, let’s hope that Tyreke Evans confidence, which should be high around the time Martin returns, is more than enough to smooth whatever rough patch exists with the backcourt pairing of Evans-Martin.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 12:15 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

hey, Noc isn't a terrible defender himself

his effort is always good at that end, and the bigger the challenge the harder he tries.

Evans ankle was hurt for a bit, and that could have affected his confidence and his willingness to drive.

Evans has distributed well, and while he needs to cut down on turnovers for sure, and maybe pass a bit more, sometimes the mistakes are those of other teammates. JT in particular does not seem to be on the same level with Tyreke when he gets the ball from him around the basket. That will hopefully improve.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Except for the OKC game

He doesn’t actually turn the ball over much. But the whole team was guilty of the same thing Evans was as well. Those games happen.

Calling Evans for poor shot selection, at times poor court vision, and lack of finishing inside when those opportunities exist seem reasonable. But, for turnover’s? No. Look at some of the guys at the top of the NBA turnover list.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 12:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

For instance ice

Look at the Turnover per 48 stat: Evans doesn’t even rank in the top 50. He’s 107th in the NBA right now. For a young player to have the ball in his hands as much as Evans does, and to not turn the ball over that much is amazing.

So, gotta say the numbers disagree with you.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 12:42 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

ah, very good example of stats proving normal observation incorrect

thanks for that

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I doubt you were alone

There is a rookie in the top 10 in TO’s, and it’s Jonny Flynn.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 12:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Evans is 28th in point guard's assist to turnover ratio

averaging 1.84 assists per

Beno is averaging 1.79

the amazing thing is that Jason Williams leads the league at 4.33 assists per TO

maybe we shoulda got him to back up Evans?

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 12:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No we shouldn't have

Evans assist total is low. Does assist total really matter here? I mean, really?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hahaha that was a joke man

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 1:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I understand that

Let me explain my point differently. Does assists matter? Therefore, does assist to turnover ratio matter if assists mean less? I focus on TO’s far more because TO’s mean far more in the grand scheme of things.

If you want to accurately show something, you might want to use the TOV% to USG rate and that will tell you something about how effective each player is.

I’m going to pick 6 players: Dwyane Wade, Tyreke Evans, Rajon Rondo, Jonny Flynn, Joe Johnson and Kobe Bryant. Most of them turn the ball over at a very high rate (Flynn & Wade extremely high) and ALL of them have the ball in their hands A LOT.

Wade: USG: 37.1% TOV%: 10.1
Evans
: USG: 25.3 TOV% 12.5
Rondo: USG: 17.2% TOV% 19.3
Flynn: USG: 25.2 TOV% 20.6
Johnson: USG: 27% TOV%: 12.7%
Bryant: USG: 37.1% TOV%: 10.1%

USG is pretty simple. It’s the amount of possessions a player uses while on the floor. TOV% is how many of those possessions, per 100 possessions, you turn the ball over. Here is the glossary if you don’t trust my explanation.

Simply put, Rajon Rondo is not as effective as a ball handler as his reputation says. Jonny Flynn is a turnover machine. Joe Johnson, Kobe Bryant and Joe Johnson are not. Tyreke Evans and Jonny Flynn are rookies, and until they get a few season’s under their belt it’s impossible to say how they will project. But if you take the early returns (and it’s way too early to note anything but the numbers) Flynn is a high TO machine and Evans is clearly not.

I picked all these guys out because they all do different things, but in every case they either initiate the offense or are the major source of where the offense looks to base it’s productivity off.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:27 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Just to throw the gauntlet out there

Here is Wabeno’s: USG: 19.2 TOV% 16.1
Martin’s: USG: 29.1 TOV% 5%

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

is that from draft express?

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 1:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Click on the links

It’s all B-Ref stats.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If you like to look at efficiency stat's for Flynn & Evans you can at DX

Here is Flynn’s, and Evans’ numbers.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Heh.

Rajon Rondo is not as effective as a ball handler as his reputation says.

I don’t care what his reputation is…he’s a big part of why the Celtics win – period. I didn’t even know he had a reputation other than that he’s a more than capable point guard that rocked in the playoffs last year and kept the Celtics afloat longer than they deserved to be.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 13, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Would you trade Evans for Rondo?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 4:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

nope

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How or why is that question relevant to my post?

I’m saying “Rondo is the shit.” Does that have to mean I want him on the Kings?

“I like Marc Gasol’s game.” Go ahead, ask me if I want to trade JT or Hawes or both for Gasol.

“I also think Kobe is the best closer in the game.” Ask me if I want to trade Evans and JT for Kobe now.

Jeez, dude. Relax. Rondo’s a dope point guard…if you don’t agree that’s fine.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 13, 2009 5:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

For Boston he is yes

For a lot of other teams? Probably not.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 5:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of two-sided arguments here

We all want to say “I’m right, you’re wrong.” But there are a lot of mixed truths in this discussion.

I see a lot of folks criticizing one poster for not backing up statements with facts/stats using statements not backed up by facts/stats. And those same posters aren’t really pointing the same general criticism at Ziller’s conversation starter, which is also based on a small sample size. But, eight games into a new and potential exciting season, we have to go with what we have so far.

Stats inform us just as visual observation does. The difference of opinion derived from thiose inputs what makes us unique, and those aren’t set in stone. Things change. Opinions change. If we all thought the same thing, this would be a pretty boring site.

What’s clear, in my opinion, is we have a team again that is at least arguing over, and that’s a good thing.

When Martin comes back, he’s going to play, Beno’s going to play and Tyreke’s going to play, and I assume Westphal will try to find the right combos and mix of playing time to make it work.

In the meantime, I am going to the game tonight to add some fresh inputs.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 13, 2009 12:44 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I agree with you about sample size

But I don’t mind the observation noting that it’s a small sample size, and there will be time to judge how these lineup’s work over the course of the whole season. We couldn’t base every judgment off the first 5 games, but we shouldn’t do that with the last 3 games size. Sample Size, yanno?

On the other hand I thought TZ proved the point that Tyreke Evans is a PG whether it’s with Beno Udrih on the court or Kevin Martin starting with him.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 12:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Unprovable
On the other hand I thought TZ proved the point that Tyreke Evans is a PG whether it’s with Beno Udrih on the court or Kevin Martin starting with him.

I must have missed that and not quite sure how you can “prove” someone is a point guard. But, as some folks have pointed out, it may not matter. Call him a combo guard, call him a point guard, call him whatever you want as long we win.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 13, 2009 12:58 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

The best Kings backcourt features Evans as a point guard. If you don’t believe he can do it, you will likely have January, February, March and April to convince everyone else.

Maybe unprovable to you. Maybe not. Doesn’t matter to me.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

draft expresss has a similar stat as B-R

called team possession percentage, where Evans has possession 18.9% of the game, 10th in the league among point guards

Tyreke scores .89 points per possession, .24 assists, and .13 turnovers

Beno has a team possesssion percentage of 12.2%, scores 1.04 points per, .30 assists, .17 turnovers

Martin’s possession percentage is 27.6, third in shooting guards,
scores 1.15, and has .10 assists and .05 turnovers.

No other players with that high a possession percentage score that many points per possession

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 1:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That's what the USG is (team possession %)

I’m glad we agree Beno is playing well, to his career norm, but that he benefits by playing with Evans. Martin benefits by playing with Evans when he will be playing with more confidence.

If anything, this recent 3 game win streak has led some to believe fallacies without stripping away all the realities that came with both realities.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 1:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, Beno actually scores well when they use him

otherwise he an Evans have similar numbers. He dishes out more assists and turnovers, but i would say they are comparable.

On defense Evans has the edge. He gets 17.9% of the teams steals compared to Beno’s 8.8 ( and Martin gets 23.9% of the team’s total steals.

Evans gets 9.2% of all the teams rebounds to Udrih’s 5.2. (Kevin Martin gets 12.4% when he plays.)

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 2:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Beno isn't that good of a scorer

Certainly doesn’t provide the same threat that Martin does over the course of a 48 min game. Beno is playing well, but I think we will see by the end of this homestand how long WaBeno last’s.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 2:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Last night's game

didn’t help your case.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 9:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If WaBeno last's

I’ll be happy to admit I’m wrong.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 12:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Who's the real PG on the Kings?

If your criteria of what a PG does, is that he initiates the offense and gets the ball to other players so that they can take the most efficent shot, then Sergio is our real PG.

Based on this years limited statistical numers: Per 36minutes
Sergio averages 5.0 assists
Tyreke averages 4.8 assists
Beno averages 4.5 assists

Small sample size & doesnt’ take into consideration who they played with or against.

So, it isn’t proof of anything, just as TZ’s number aren’t proof of anything. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and will make their judgement on what criteria they deem important and how they view the players play.

I consider the player that handles the ball the PG, whether he’s a playmaker first or a score first type of player. Someone else may believe that a PG needs to be a Playmaker first. This difference makes arguing futile as well as the use of statistics futile in proving your point.

Whether we have a PG & a SG, or 2 PG’s or 2 SG’s doesn’t matter. What matters is can the Kings win with the combo we put on the floor, and who’s on the floor with them. Which is what TZ is trying to say. Although the final tally needs to come after 82 games and not 8.

In the end, whether or not Tyreke & Martin are our backcourt of the future, will depend on who we can acquire that is better, more than how well they play. If someone like CP3 were to become available, then the question becomes who’s better at the 2, Tyreke or Martin. But, until that better player becomes available, we need to put the best 5 players in the starting lineup. And, when Martin comes back, that mean Tyreke & Martin.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Nov 13, 2009 1:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

well according to Hollinger's Pure Point Rating, Jason Thompson is

his PPR is the best among power forwards at 2.51. Beno’s is 1.26 and Evans is 1.57.

Makes sense.Shock played guard until his growth spurt. He also scores 1.41 points per possession, .32 assists and .12 turnovers

Unfortunately his possession percentage is only 9.8%

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 2:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

he needs to start jacking up 3s

in truth, the reason his TO rate has lowered is related to his fouls. Last season, JT had that, “OK everyone I am going to move into you” spin that got him 1-3 charging fouls per game (which are also charged as TOs).

The footwork has improved, the fouling is down, and therefore the TOs are down, and assists are up (to be a bit facetious, part of the reason his assists are up are is because he is not passing to himself under the basket).

by betweentheeyes on Nov 13, 2009 2:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i thought it was interesting

Spencer has a higher possession percentage at 11.5%, but he only scores .98 compared to Shock’s 1.41 points per possession.

And Spencer’s lauded passing ability is not coming shining through so far: he has .17 assists and .19 turnovers per possession. He has a negative PPR of -3.01. Only Kenny, Desmond, and Donte were worse.

I think he is starting to pick it up though.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 2:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Those are very skewed stats

Especially when you consider the way each have played. I just think you’re delving a bit deep into those stats when there are plenty of ways to launch a rebuttal about Spencer vs Jason’s passing.

Be careful at what conclusions you draw from the numbers you cite Ice.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 3:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

the only conclusions i really got is that Spence needs to play better

and he will.

Also, I think Thompson has some skills that maybe we don’t always notice or take for granted. He did have that one game with 7 assists I think.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Nov 13, 2009 5:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well I notice those skills

But I agree with you the masses don’t.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 5:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

FTR, I was going by the traditional notion of a pure point

One who is a playmaker first: Steve Nash being the great example.

by VirginiaBlue on Nov 13, 2009 5:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So you're going to ask that whoever the Kings draft sit on the bench for 2 years before he starts to become that?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 5:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

At this point in his career Evans might not be a good fit with Martin...

or maybe he will be…but 3 years down the line when Evan’s has realized his full potential I’m sure he’d fit with a shooter like Martin.

Evan’s a little turnover prone and can use the help of playing alongside another point guard guard. Beno helps take the pressure off Evans and Evans helps take the pressure off Beno.

by ucla06 on Nov 13, 2009 3:00 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Haven't we proven in this thread that Evans is not in fact turnover prone?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 3:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, remember the time when Martin scored almost 50 points in a game this season?

Yeah, too bad they lost.

Wait, what? They won? And Martin was basically the main reason they won?

I’m not saying that Martin needs to score 50 points for the Kings to win. And there are times when I feel like the Kings rely too much on their best player. But to say that Martin needs to go because the other players tend to stand around when he has the ball is ludicrous. You don’t just get rid of one of the most efficient scorers in the league.

If you ask me, the solution to the problem is to continue starting the best players (Noc and Hawes), and to have everybody actually move around on offense when Martin’s in the game.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Nov 13, 2009 3:33 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

You should be a head coach Leroy

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Nov 13, 2009 3:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think Martin will be considered the Kings best player by the end of the year.

And yes, I do hope they get rid of their bad habit of just standing around when their studs (’Reke and Kev) have the ball.

33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.

by JETisKing on Nov 13, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Looks like I picked the wrong time to go to Vegas

I have a question in regards to all of this point guard – lead guard – two guard nonsense, specifically in regards to whether or not Evans and Martin can play together. So let’s play a game that I’ve created while sitting on the airport. I call it “Find the true point guard.”

Ainge/D.Johnson
Jordan/B.J. Armstrong
Jordan/Paxson
Jordan/Kerr
Parker/Ginobli (take a hard look at Parker’s assist rate before answering that)
Bryant/(insert your choice of names here)

I’m sure that there are a ton of these examples. I like the Ainge/DJ example the best, because that Boston team initiated offense through everyone, making them nearly impossible to scout and defend. I’d like to see us head in that direction.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Nov 15, 2009 10:11 AM PST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

But they only won 2 championships together (Ainge & Johnson)

And they rid on Bird’s coattail’s the whole time.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea

by pookeyguru on Nov 15, 2009 7:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.
Start posting about the Kings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Spaceshaolinninja_small
NCAA Hoops Preview from the Kings' Perspective
Zebulon_small
Jason Thompson, Foul Machine
Eastern_logs_small
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Week 3
Old_logo_gif_small
Pookeyguru's Salary Cap FAQ
Eastern_logs_small
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly: Week 2

Recent FanPosts

Small
Spencer Hawes's failing grade
Small
Searching for a backup center
Small
If the Kings Lose Tonight it's All My Fault...
S5000963_small
Break Down of New Possible Trade
___small
Kings Remain Active in Trade Talks
Tyreke_yahoo_small
Okafor vs. Our Bigs
Small
The Trade Block

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Local Sponsors


Editor

Loofie_small Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Authors

Banana2_small Exhibit G