The Prospect of Emeka Okafor
Sam Amick of The Bee reports the Kings are discussing an Emeka Okafor-Kenny Thomas trade with the Hornets. Thomas's contract, as we all know, expires this summer. Okafor's deal runs through 2014. Here's a full salary breakdown, thanks to ShamSports.com.
| Player | '09-10 | '10-11 | '11-12 | '12-13 | '13-14 |
| Thomas | $8.7M | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Okafor | $10.8M | $11.8M | $12.8M | $13.8M | $14.8M* |
That 2013-14 season has an early termination option for Okafor. Clearly, in losing Thomas the Kings would only be losing a spot bench forward and the opportunity cost of using his expiring contract in another trade. There are very few big names expected to be available for expiring contracts this trade deadline -- Carlos Boozer, Stephen Jackson, Elton Brand and perhaps Monta Ellis lead that class. (Despite what you may have heard, Toronto ain't trading Chris Bosh for anything less than a couple of Sacramento's top assets -- think Kevin Martin and Jason Thompson, or something like that. Pipe. Dream.)
The real question here is whether Okafor is worth the cost of his own salary for the Kings. That's also an opportunity cost issue: if the Kings take on Okafor without losing one of its longer contracts, the free agency periods of 2010, 2011 and possibly 2012 are essentially wiped out. And that really depends on what you think the Kings could get in free agency right now.
I think free agency is a big risk. The best player the Sacramento Kings have ever acquired as a free agent (not including any extensions/re-signings) is Vlade Divac. At the time, the team overpaid for Vlade -- he was making All-Star level money despite a reputation as an average starting center with a few special skills. No one (but Geoff Petrie, perhaps) knew how well Divac would mesh with Chris Webber and friends.
Who is No. 2 behind Divac? Bobby Jackson, who at the time of his signing was a three-year vet with a career 8 ppg average? Shareef Abdur-Rahim? John Salmons? The Kings, even when great, have never signed high-level free agents. This is not particularly Sacramento-specific, either: few great players move in unrestricted free agency. This coming summer is a bit of an anomaly that players are even getting to free agency ... and it's still unlikely many of the big names will move.
So I'm not sure the Kings lose much by way of renouncing a big free agency splash for 2-3 years. As I said, you limit your trade deadline opportunities by sending away Thomas's contract ... but there was unlikely to be much out there better than Okafor (depending on your feelings about how Boozer would mesh here, or whether the Suns will careen and make Amar'e Stoudemire available again). Despite being traded recently, Okafor wouldn't be an easily movable contract for a while -- any trade including him is a necessarily big trade, and those are harder to pull off. So he becomes your "hardest to trade" asset, eclipsing Beno Udrih and Andres Nocioni. Further augmentation to the roster would fall to trades involving the team's bevy of non-stars/non-youths, trades involving the prospects, trades involving draft picks, mid-level or sub mid-level free agent signings and the draft. You'd have to be fairly comfortable that the current team (with Okafor and the 2010 draft pick and some internal growth) would be able to be a playoff team within a year or two to justify the trade.
And I think that's fair. When Kevin Martin is healthy, the Kings have clearly above average players at point guard (Tyreke Evans), shooting guard (Martin) and power forward (Jason Thompson). The team has one serviceable starter (as of today) at small forward (Nocioni) and center (Spencer Hawes). You'd hope Hawes will be more than that any day now, but let's not be deluded. He's not there yet. He's better than some starting centers out there, but not too many. He's not clearly above average today ... many would argue he's not average today.
Adding Okafor would give you an above average player at a fourth position. It'd also give the starting line-up its first elite defensive player (Evans isn't there) and it would likely cinch the Kings as an elite rebounding team. Okafor, while less versatile than Hawes, also happens to be a serviceable offensive weapon: he's smart with the ball, and has a career field goal percentage better than 50 percent. If he hurts the offense, it's in his lack of ability to stretch the defense. Given that Hawes has shot poorly this year but the Kings offense has been on fire (thanks to Martin, then Evans, Thompson and Udrih), I'm not sure how much of a concern that is.
The only real question which remains is what this means for Hawes. He can negotiate a contract extension this summer. As of today, it is quite easy to see that he and the Kings will be far apart on his value. He's the first prominent Kings kid in the post-Webber era that I think could get to restricted free agency. (Extending Kevin Martin early was a no-brainer, and Francisco Garcia got a fairly generous deal, which wasn't difficult to anticipate.) Either way, in the interim, Hawes is a good third big. A pissed-off Hawes could be a great third big. It's not terribly easy to explain, but pinning Hawes behind a middling, old center during an awful season felt a whole lot worse than pinning him behind an above average center in his prime during a surprisingly competitve season seems.
All this ignores a few other points that make the rumor itself a positive. I mean, are we actually talking about the Kings considering an expensive move?! A move that implies the franchise thinks they are fairly close to contending for a playoff spot? That's a huge step from where we were even three weeks ago. If the deal doesn't happen, this is still a blast of excitement in mid-November, and there's no discounting that after the last couple seasons.
4 recs |
859 comments
|
Comments
That's
my thinking on that too … if they were to just let the K-9 go away, who would they spend that money on? Would they be better than Okafor?
I think the whole “Free Agent Year of 2010” has every fan hoping their team can pull something off, but let’s be real. Like TZ said, the highest profile FA we’ve ever had is Vlade Divac …. if the deal goes through, maybe Petrie doesn’t wanna gamble on trying to convince someone to come here. instead, he’d force Okafor to come here.
I still don’t know where I’d fall on this trade, if it even happens.
by what_the_crap on Nov 14, 2009 2:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
+1
Were nit getting LeBron, were not getting Wade. Let’s get Okafor now!
Is my banana fluffy enough?
by 27freethrows on Nov 14, 2009 2:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rumors like this make me want to cry.
Like rumors of us willing to sell our soul for Kurt Rambis. Let’s see I’ve got a guy with a career avg. of 13/10 that I.m spending Labron money on. I wonder what my motivation for getting some sucker team like the kings to take his rediculously bloated long term contract could be. Oh I don’t know, getting rid of the most overpaid player in the nba maybe. Would you pay Chris Kaman 14 million dollars a year? No? But you’ll give that kind of money to a guy who isn’t as good as Kaman. With all do respect, if you can’t see the folly in bailing New Orleans out of their stupidity than you are an idiot. This trade will make the kenny tomas trade and sharrif signing look like sound decisions. Don’t believe me? Look at Omeka’s career stats. He’s already over the hill avg. 10ppg and 9rpg this season and frankly his numbers have gotten worse every year since his rookie year when he avg. 15/10. I can’t even write anymore. The only thing I can hope is that sam amick has this as wrong as he usually has everything. STUPID STUPID STUPID!!!!!!!
by CoyoteBlue on Nov 14, 2009 11:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yah
but his stats have gone down…. based on 11 games.
by Slaaam on Nov 15, 2009 12:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
with a new team, less minutes and 2 coaches
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 15, 2009 12:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
wow
if you think that’s Lebron money, I have some oceanside property in Iowa to sell you.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
by Viliphied on Nov 15, 2009 2:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He would be a bench player.
And Bench players are not worth that kind of money.
by mayfieldcol on Nov 15, 2009 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He would be the starter
You’re right about the second half of what you said, but you don’t follow your own logic. if Okafor was traded to the Kings it would be to become the starter.
And obviously if everything was hunky dory with how things are shaping up at center this post wouldn’t even exist and Ziller’s poll would be running 70-30 against.
"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)
by Mucho Moss on Nov 15, 2009 10:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If everything was hunky dory MM...
…there wouldn’t have been any discussion of Okafor by the Kings.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
by pookeyguru on Nov 15, 2009 10:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
correctamente
and my sentiments exactly.
"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)
by Mucho Moss on Nov 15, 2009 11:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tom Ziller: Voice of Reason
"It ain't over till it's over." - Yogi Berra
by 49er16 on Nov 14, 2009 2:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I HATE missed free throws
and he’s a terrible (60%) FT shooter. I don’t really know the guys game. Decent numbers but thats a Lot of bacon.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Coachie can fix that
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The free agency isssue is the most important point
We don’t get top-shelf signings, never have.
As for remaining options for the trade deadline, if the team continues to play hard (win or lose), Nocioni and Beno will be very attractive to playoff contenders. I think we can get a very solid center without breaking the bank. And Okafor has proven durable most of his career.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen.
by andy sims on Nov 14, 2009 2:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
UUUUUUHHHHHHHHHHHHG!!!!!!!!
Let’s see I’ve got a guy with a career avg. of 13/10 that I.m spending Labron money on. I wonder what my motivation for getting some sucker team like the kings to take his rediculously bloated long term contract could be. Oh I don’t know, getting rid of the most overpaid player in the nba maybe. Would you pay Chris Kaman 14 million dollars a year? No? But you’ll give that kind of money to a guy who isn’t as good as Kaman. With all do respect, if you can’t see the folly in bailing New Orleans out of their stupidity than you are an idiot. This trade will make the kenny tomas trade and sharrif signing look like sound decisions. Don’t believe me? Look at Omeka’s career stats. He’s already over the hill avg. 10ppg and 9rpg this season and frankly his numbers have gotten worse every year since his rookie year when he avg. 15/10. I can’t even write anymore. The only thing I can hope is that sam amick has this as wrong as he usually has everything. STUPID STUPID STUPID!!!!!!!
by CoyoteBlue on Nov 14, 2009 11:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How should I respond, stupid?
I hope that’s not offensive, I know sometimes you have to talk down to the level of your audience.
For starters, Okafor’s career stats are closer to 14/11, but that’s just nitpicking.
Do you actually believe that LBJ’s salary this year of $15,779,912 is equivalent to Okafor’s $10.8 million? Do you think that after next summer, James’ salary will be anywhere in the neighborhood of Okafor’s $11.8 million? Assuming Lebron’s salary jumps to the max, he’d have to be knocking down better than 28 points a night and 22 rebounds to justify his salary compared to Okafor.. But that comparison is stupid. Hope you like it.
Kaman may look like a goofball, but there are only a handful of Kings I wouldn’t give up to get him. My only reservation there is he’s had some injuries the past couple years, unlike Okafor, who played every single game the past two seasons.
The trade that brought Kenny Thomas here was a good trade. It broke up Webber’s contract into manageable pieces, two-thirds of which has been off the books for a few years. But I know that involves math, and I’m guessing you are no better at that than you are with language.
Since you only just joined today, I’m going to suggest that you head on back to the SacBee site and work on your trolling. Right now, you’re boring and obvious, and when you criticize your betters, it really only makes you look…
Gotta be a good word for it. You work on that.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen.
by andy sims on Nov 15, 2009 12:18 AM PST up reply actions 4 recs
Don't copy and paste your replies
You ruin the brilliance of the original when you repost.
by otis29 on Nov 15, 2009 6:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There is an action button with CoyoteBlue's name on it
use it
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 6:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
Not my first day here bte, fyi.
by otis29 on Nov 15, 2009 7:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
not meant to be personal to you Otis
more of a shout out to anyone looking at the other 4 posts on this same thread. I happened over to At the Hive and the same post was there. It is spam.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 7:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I posted this in the other thread
You do it.
There is nobody in FA that would be better than Emeka Okafor that we can realistically get. This would ensure our defense would be more than solid for the next decade.
If we do this, I’d be willing to compare these Kings to the 04 Pistons:
Billups – Evans
Hamilton – Martin
Prince – Casspi
R. Wallace – JT
B. Wallace – Okafor
Corliss – Brockman?? May??
Okur – Hawes
James – Beno
Dare to dream? If all of the guys develop….
by Scirocco on Nov 14, 2009 2:14 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Can't see it.
The Detroit group was so special defensively I don’t think the current group of Kings could ever match that.
In addition you had players that were mentally tough as nails like Billups, Hamilton and intimidating inside with Rasheed and Ben.
BOOK IT!
by kingme18 on Nov 14, 2009 2:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention I think Billups has better court vision
but not the penetrating ability of Evans.
I see some similarities, but not enough, really.
"We ain't in the takin' prisoners business. We in the killin' Nazi's business...and Cousin, business is a-boomin'."
by PhutureKings on Nov 14, 2009 2:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Billups is built like a bull too
Billups can shoot with the best of anybody and can post up smaller guards.
BOOK IT!
by kingme18 on Nov 14, 2009 6:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It took Billups 5 years to really develop
doesn’t look like it will take Tyreke that long
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 6:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rasheed is the biggest reason why I can't compare the two teams.
When he’s on, ‘Sheed can score inside and out. He has a toughness and attitude that JT and Okafor don’t have. Until JT can consistently use his left, have two go to moves and shoot the 3, he has a long way to go before he could be compared to ’Sheed.
On the other hand, JT and Okafor both show the ability to rebound like Big Ben. Okafor is just as good a shotblocker that Big Ben was in his prime. I really JT will get there soon.
Scirocco, I get what you’re saying though. I think our bench is superior to that bench. All we need is more experience for them to play with each other.
33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.
by JETisKing on Nov 14, 2009 10:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
admit it
you just wanted to write Prince Casspi didnt you
by LPKingsFan on Nov 14, 2009 11:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Brainless Fool!
Let’s see I’ve got a guy with a career avg. of 13/10 that I.m spending Labron money on. I wonder what my motivation for getting some sucker team like the kings to take his rediculously bloated long term contract could be. Oh I don’t know, getting rid of the most overpaid player in the nba maybe. Would you pay Chris Kaman 14 million dollars a year? No? But you’ll give that kind of money to a guy who isn’t as good as Kaman. With all do respect, if you can’t see the folly in bailing New Orleans out of their stupidity than you are an idiot. This trade will make the kenny tomas trade and sharrif signing look like sound decisions. Don’t believe me? Look at Omeka’s career stats. He’s already over the hill avg. 10ppg and 9rpg this season and frankly his numbers have gotten worse every year since his rookie year when he avg. 15/10. I can’t even write anymore. The only thing I can hope is that sam amick has this as wrong as he usually has everything. STUPID STUPID STUPID!!!!!!!
by CoyoteBlue on Nov 14, 2009 11:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
PLEASE don't post the same comment 4 times.
Saying it over and over again doesn’t make your argument any better.
by Slaaam on Nov 14, 2009 11:54 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
This isn't even a legit conversation.
It assumes Petrie has a head injury and that is bad for morale.
by CoyoteBlue on Nov 14, 2009 11:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
or CB has a head injury
Short term memory loss maybe?
by markdog333 on Nov 15, 2009 6:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL Wow
The NBA: "Where 27 free throws happens"
by lodisacfan on Nov 15, 2009 8:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What's this guy'
The NBA: "Where 27 free throws happens"
by lodisacfan on Nov 15, 2009 8:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
*What's this guy's deal?
The NBA: "Where 27 free throws happens"
by lodisacfan on Nov 15, 2009 8:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Curious to know
if you would pull the trigger on this deal Ziller?
by gtrman1973 on Nov 14, 2009 2:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
What are we waiting for...
K9 for Okafor straight up? PULL THE TRIGGER ALREADY!
by Smills91 on Nov 14, 2009 6:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What are we waiting for...
K9 for Okafor straight up? PULL THE TRIGGER ALREADY!
by Smills91 on Nov 14, 2009 6:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Smills
check it out: Being a sports fan is amazing sometimes. For example right now, because you and I are in total agreement!
I am high fiving you because you are exactly right. Okafor for The Woofman?! Straight up?! What is there to think about?
"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)
by Mucho Moss on Nov 15, 2009 11:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Money MM
Okafor is owed alot of it over the next 4 season’s.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
by pookeyguru on Nov 15, 2009 11:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
oh yeah...
that’s right. I knew there had to be a catch…
I do enjoy playing with Gavin and Joe’s money though.
"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)
by Mucho Moss on Nov 16, 2009 12:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't we all MM
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
by pookeyguru on Nov 16, 2009 12:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm gonna shoot myself!
Let’s see I’ve got a guy with a career avg. of 13/10 that I.m spending Labron money on. I wonder what my motivation for getting some sucker team like the kings to take his rediculously bloated long term contract could be. Oh I don’t know, getting rid of the most overpaid player in the nba maybe. Would you pay Chris Kaman 14 million dollars a year? No? But you’ll give that kind of money to a guy who isn’t as good as Kaman. With all do respect, if you can’t see the folly in bailing New Orleans out of their stupidity than you are an idiot. This trade will make the kenny tomas trade and sharrif signing look like sound decisions. Don’t believe me? Look at Omeka’s career stats. He’s already over the hill avg. 10ppg and 9rpg this season and frankly his numbers have gotten worse every year since his rookie year when he avg. 15/10. I can’t even write anymore. The only thing I can hope is that sam amick has this as wrong as he usually has everything. STUPID STUPID STUPID!!!!!!!
by CoyoteBlue on Nov 14, 2009 11:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jump off the Dubai Berg
It’s probably cheaper.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
by pookeyguru on Nov 15, 2009 7:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Crap, you saw the video from the top, right?
That’s way too much time to reconsider before you hit the ground.
by bartenpa on Nov 15, 2009 8:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, forgot to mention
CB, you’re a moron, try to enjoy your imminent banning, I know I will.
by bartenpa on Nov 15, 2009 8:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with everything you say Z
and the main thing for anyone to consider is that if the Kings do this move, that’s pretty much it. Aside from a couple draft picks here and there and maybe a couple simple trades, this would be the core we are moving forward with. We would depend on the further development of JT, Hawes, Casspi, Greene, and Reke to see how far we get in thr playoffs.
I guess the way I want to look at it this is comparing a starting lineup of Reke, Kevin, Cisco or Noc (one is gonna have to go), JT, and Okafor with the other top teams in the West.
Could that lineup hang in a couple years with the Blazers, Thunder, (by then declining) Lakers, Magic, Hawks? I’m looking at 2-3 years down the road when hopefully we should be making a big push deep in the playoffs. I want to say yes
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 2:16 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Slightly disagree
Agree with a lot, but not sure we would be limited to only simple trades. With Martin, JT, Hawes, Casspi, Noc, Udrih, Garcia, Reke and draft picks we actually have some ammo to still pull off another monster trade if we wanted too. I mean even keeping Reke and Okafor – I would imagine that Martin and JT or Hawes, Omri and a 1st could help us pull in another big name player.
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with that
Saw your post in the other thread and thought about it. I just think that the main pieces should be the building blocks and any future trade could be reduced to a one-for-one trade. I don’t think, after adding Okafor, that we should package something like KEvin and JT for Bosh for example.
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 2:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, I would want to see how this core performs. However, we will still have our MLEs that Petrie loves too. So we can still add and trade pieces. I just think adding this kind of talent to our roster without subtracting talent (only the value of an expiring) is too tantalizing to pass up on. Okafor seems to fit the core of what we are trying to build here and we would still have enough pieces to make more future deals if this team peaked at a non-contender level.
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 3:01 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
let's do this
and then get Bosh for Kev and JT!
Then we roll out Tyreke, Beno, Noce, Bosh, Okafor, and come off the bench with Udoka, Casspi, Hawes. That’s a pretty good 8, and there is growth potential for Ty, Casspi, Hawes, Donte.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
by Holmdel on Nov 14, 2009 4:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That would be a nasty starting 5 no doubt.
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 4:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not enough shooting in the starting line
toughness but . . .you need to spread the floor in todays NBA
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bosh can shoot well enough
You don’t turn down an opportunity to pick Bosh up if all you sacrifice is some shooting.
BOOK IT!
by kingme18 on Nov 14, 2009 6:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't agree
you need a cold blooded shooter in your starting 5 to contend
But funny how the Beno talk has changed.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 6:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Okafor
With Emeka, JT and Hawes, I think we have a solid 3-man rotation at the bigs.
I would prefer JT and Martin over Bosh. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised at all to see JT matching Bosh’s production as early as next season. He has a better looking jumpshot than Bosh, he is a better passer, he can handle the ball better, and he is nearly his equal in rebounding. If his low post skills keep developing, he is going to be a beast in this league.
We will love this trade this year, but after that it depends on what Hawes does. If we sign him at a large number, we are going to have a lot of money tied up in him and Okafor when we need to sign JT the following year. I just hope this isn’t a knee-jerk reaction to Hawes’ slow start.
by markdog333 on Nov 15, 2009 6:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Unless Hawes produces much bigger
he will not be signed to “a large number” (relatively speaking, they are all large numbers, even the league minimums).
If Okafor produces according to his past five seasons and we have all witnessed JT’s emegence – Spencer Hawes becomes (even more) expendable. No one else will sign him to big money – unless he shows evidence he can produce as his upside is limited. He won’t command Okafor money, JT on the other hand, if he continues to progress, is looking at over the MLE type money.
The other big issue is that the salary cap is diminishing and so will salaries overall. Okafor has a “pre-diminished” contract so his current deal is necessarily inflated in comparison to what he would command if signing a deal today (or tomorrow).
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 7:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
even Darko got 8 mill a year
GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
by iashwash on Nov 15, 2009 7:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if he was $8 to $9 mil/year
I wouldn’t even bat an eye. I don’t think this contract bothers me as much as knowing that the combination of this contract, the Garcia contract and the Beno contract may prevent us from signing Greene if he keeps improving or Casspi at some point.
I’m ok if this goes either way though. I’m not sure this makes us a playoff team this year. It probably depends on how well the team can keep the wheels on with KMart out for a couple months.
by markdog333 on Nov 15, 2009 7:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you realize that Bosh is playing at an insane level right now, right? He’s at a 32 PER.
If you think Jason Thompson can shoot, handle, and pass better than Chris Bosh…
i cry for nic
by Cablinasian on Nov 15, 2009 2:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
When did guys who average 10ppg and 10rpg start getting SUPERSTAR money????
Let’s see I’ve got a guy with a career avg. of 13/10 that I.m spending Labron money on. I wonder what my motivation for getting some sucker team like the kings to take his rediculously bloated long term contract could be. Oh I don’t know, getting rid of the most overpaid player in the nba maybe. Would you pay Chris Kaman 14 million dollars a year? No? But you’ll give that kind of money to a guy who isn’t as good as Kaman. With all do respect, if you can’t see the folly in bailing New Orleans out of their stupidity than you are an idiot. This trade will make the kenny tomas trade and sharrif signing look like sound decisions. Don’t believe me? Look at Omeka’s career stats. He’s already over the hill avg. 10ppg and 9rpg this season and frankly his numbers have gotten worse every year since his rookie year when he avg. 15/10. I can’t even write anymore. The only thing I can hope is that sam amick has this as wrong as he usually has everything. STUPID STUPID STUPID!!!!!!!
by CoyoteBlue on Nov 14, 2009 11:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You really want that banhammer don't you?
A lonely Kings fan in a sea of gold and purple...
by Jaycee on Nov 15, 2009 12:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For funzies...
I believe he spells it “LeBron.” I’d need confirmation though.
by jswaa on Nov 15, 2009 7:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like it
We need a great defensive big man. Okafor is a great defensive big man. It’s especialyl great tf Hawes accepts a role off the bench, which he presumably should because he’ll still get plenty of minutes. Okafor would be a great addition.
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 2:24 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
I agree,
Hawe’s coming off the bench could really help the offense. He is more of an offensive Center, while Okafur is more defensive.
Given the starting lineup, we need more “D” than “O”, while the opposite is true with the bench.
by nothingbutnet on Nov 14, 2009 2:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hawes doesn't necessarily have to come off the bench
The one thing I like about having a good coach in place is that I trust PW to ignore the contract and make Emeka earn his minutes. If Emeka out-plays him, Hawes has to accept his move to the bench and not feel disrespected. Either way, there is 30 minutes available for both of them.
…assuming Hawes/Okafor could spend some time backing up JT at the 4 too.
by markdog333 on Nov 15, 2009 6:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
DO IT.
Okay, 2 reasons:
One, just like Ziller beautifully put it, we’re not gonna bring in a big name FA this year or the next. We gotta be honest here: Sacramento isn’t exactly the biggest draw for a guy to come play for. Okafor is much better than any other big that we could realistically bring to Sactown. He’d be great down low with JT. And maybe Spencer could finally figure it out coming off the bench as a 6th man.
And the 2nd reason is this: It’ll bring back some of the long-lost fans to Arco. Okafor is a pretty big name and people will be dying to see him play. A starting lineup in 2 months of
‘Reke, Martin, Noc, JT and Okafor is very good. Playoffs good. And fans will take notice of this. I don’t know about you guys, but I miss the old days when teams would make the flight to Sacramento, know they’re gonna get their asses kicked, and then fly right back home.
"Are you tryin to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?"
by mvhsbball on Nov 14, 2009 2:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think this is a stretch
Okafor is a pretty big name and people will be dying to see him play.
My guess is there are a lot of fans that couldn’t even tell you what team he’s on.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 2:52 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I get that
He’s certainly been out of the limelight since he played for Charlotte for so long. People won’t be dying to see him play, but if he plays well, people will be at least excited to see the Kings play. I do agree that with him in the lineup, this team is strong enough to at least make a push for the playoffs, and that is certainly going to help put fans in seats.
by jveezy on Nov 14, 2009 2:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just not sure he makes us better
If I’m not mistaken, his next playoff appearance will be his first.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 3:00 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Fair enough
He’s not a superstar who can put a team on his back and force them to be successful, but as a piece to the puzzle, I think he can make a solid contribution. A very solid contribution. He didn’t necessarily have the pieces around him in Charlotte, so I certainly don’t fault him for not making the playoffs with that team. I didn’t really follow what went on in New Orleans so I don’t know if he just didn’t have time to fit in or what. I think he’s a solid upgrade, but the question is whether that’s worth the salary increase, and at this point I don’t really know the answer to that.
by jveezy on Nov 14, 2009 3:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Okafor is only 10 games in to his New Orleans career
Chris Paul has an ankle injury and that’s probably why this is happening.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 3:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes
emeka okafor will not bring fans to arco. that said, do this trade yesterday. look at the chart of what centers make that someone posted (sorry I am too lazy to go look up) and he is well worth it. its not often that you trade for the direct rotation replacement, but that’s what this is… jt/hawes/k9 for jt/okafor/hawes… yep, k9 was our first big off the bench, imagine that, and playing well… but this is an obvious upgrade and the minutes will work themselves out… DO IT (if NO really will…)
by lchristmas on Nov 14, 2009 9:40 PM PST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Winning will bring people to Arco
And Okafor makes that much, much more likely to happen
by dprodigy19 on Nov 15, 2009 10:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks as always TZ
Good synopsis. Hope this trade works out.
by nothingbutnet on Nov 14, 2009 2:33 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Does NO do this deal for only expiring or are they going to want picks & youth too?
I know the financial situation in NO is bleek, but they don’t draw a lot of fans now. Can a small family ownership afford to alienate their already small fan base? And, CP3 didn’t like losing his coach, so how’s he going to feel about losing his starting center?
I’m guessing NO is going to want our draft pick and young talent like Omri, to get them to make the deal. They can’t afford to sell the franchise down the river, just for the Benjamin’s.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Nov 14, 2009 2:33 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The CP3 issue might be less than you think
He was really close with Tyson Chandler, who they got rid of for Okefor. He may not be as upset about them moving Okefor, even if its for nothing, as you would think.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 2:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
na, i don't think so
I think this is just a move to drop salary, kinda like the Kings did with Artest and Bibby a few years ago.
They’re being smart. NO has looked bad this year and it would be in their best interest to start rebuilding as soon as possible.
"Are you tryin to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?"
by mvhsbball on Nov 14, 2009 2:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking the opposite
that NO might need to give up something extra. Simply because we’d be taking on a massive contract to give them some desperately needed financial flexibility.
Also, CP3’s already probably pissed about losing Tyson Chandler, who was not only his starting center but a good friend. Chances are Paul’s not happy in general. His team sucks. Chandler’s gone. Scott’s gone. The front office has basically given up on this year.
The fact that either side could really have a case in demanding youngsters/picks for the trade to be done means it’s probably pretty fair as is.
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 2:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Interestingly
the moderator at At The Hive was pretty non-commital about a straight swap. I could completely see this happening as a straight 1-for-1 deal.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 2:45 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
So Kenny Thomas = Emeka Okafor
I love NBA math . . . I really do. Trades in this league are so fascinating because of the financial aspect.
by bignerd on Nov 14, 2009 6:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Salary Cap and Financial Commitment
This is the biggest news here as Ziller points out. The Maloofs, whom earlier this year cut expenses drastically (Head Coach salary for one), and have no commitment for a larger, newer, more profitable Arena are talking about a salary cap addition of many millions of dollars. WOW!
And the last projections are the cap is to be lowered to $50M. Sham-WOW! That is saying a whole lot.
It also means that the Kings are figuring that they are not going to be cellar dwellars and that a later lottery pick is more expected than a top 5 in this big man heavy 2010 draft.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 2:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm really excited if the Maloofs are willing to spend
I think they see some financial relief in the form of increased ticket sales if we’re winning. Arco hasn’t been filled but its looking a little better
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 2:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's never been in their nature to be penny pinchers
I’ve known a few people who have worked for them before they were even a blip on the radar, they like to make a big move if they believe it’s the right move.
by bignerd on Nov 14, 2009 6:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I get that same impression.
They’re not Paul Allen, but they’re not Donald Sterling of the 90’s either.
by Smills91 on Nov 14, 2009 6:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A couple more thoughts:
1. I think Nocioni might be more tradeable than we think. Especially to a contending team with some expirings. He’s tough, plays D, strokes the three ball, and will play whatever role he’s asked to. I wouldn’t be surprised if a contender looks to pick him up later in the year. I still think Boston would gladly take him for Tony Allen, Scalabrine and a pick.
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 2:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
it is gonna be hard to do anything this year
teams that could use Noc like Miami, who could use a 3 point shooter and some toughness at the 3 are trying to keep their expirings
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 2:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Emeka is overpaid, but with the depth we would have up front I think he would benefit
He has almost always been the best big man on his team, and he isn’t one of the bigger centers. But with Shock and Hawes around to help him out and score around him, and a great backcourt to defend the perimeter and create easy shots for him, he could have a couple career years in Sacramento. Maybe earn his money.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 2:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
here is a question: On defense, rebounding should be even better, someone to block shots and clog, On offense - will he be in JT's way and vice versa?
will the two of them clog the middle and take away Tyreke’s drives? Or will they enhance it with another guy to dish to and another guy for Evans to use as a screen?
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 2:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think JT is more versatile than we give him credit for
both he and Spencer can hit the outside J, and JT has good passing ability.
Okafor can hit that baseline 15 footer pretty darn good too.
Just depends on how Westie wants to use his guys.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thinking out loud....Okafor is overpaid for a career 14/11 player but he does play well above average D
Barring injury he has probably reached his ceiling but on the other hand he can probably play at this level for another for a good while. I agree that TZ is probably right in arguing that we couldn’t get anybody better in FA. He is a character guy and if we added him to the mix we would be a dominant rebounding team with strong D. Sham says he’s interested in hermaphrodites but that’s just Sham.This could knock a year off the rebuilding if the kids keep developing. Hmmmm
Ok I thought about it. I would vote yes as long as we don’t have to give up anything of value to get him. make the deal
"I make love to pressure" - Stephen Jackson
by Bluejohn on Nov 14, 2009 2:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I never liked Okafor for some reason
seems like JT without the work ethic and with more money to me.
I’d rather see the KT money used to lock up Shock, Green and Hawes for the long run.
by sdfd on Nov 14, 2009 2:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
without work ethic? where did you get that?
he’s a gym rat
by kingme on Nov 14, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
He’s known for working out like crazy.
Is my banana fluffy enough?
by 27freethrows on Nov 14, 2009 3:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree on the Okafor-work ethic statement but I do agree with...
I’d rather see the KT money used to lock up Shock, Green and Hawes for the long run.
Not sure how we’re going to get the money to keep them in the future.
33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.
by JETisKing on Nov 14, 2009 10:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
After thinking about it
I think Okafur is way overpaid. The Kings are going in a different direction, and it’s focused on signing solid contributors on the cheap. No more big paydays.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 2:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Rookies are not staying on their rookie deals for ever
They are going to have to get paid some day and we can’t just keep adding kids. Not arguing about not signing Okafor, I can understand that. But you keep saying that we are not going to pay anyone anymore and I have no idea how we are going to compete in the future then.
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 3:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
With the next batch of kids and
solid but cheap vets.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sounds like the Clippers
What have they done?
by kingme on Nov 14, 2009 3:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't agree
I think we are gonna have to add a more than solid piece some time because we can’t solely depend on yougn players development. And again, thos kids are gonna have t o get paid after their rookie contratcs are up.
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 3:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Been playing with trade machine
Trying to find a third team to possibly take Noc, after going through most contenders cant really find a logical third. I’m really on the fence about this one if we could offload Noc somehow i would feel much better about it but that dose not seem likely.
by SKanthony on Nov 14, 2009 2:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Keep Noc
Casspi and Greene are not just ready for extended prime time minutes yet. The present formula is working.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 3:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah keeping him right this minute looks good
But when Cisco and Kmart are back in the line up plus the improving play of Omri and Greene if we did this trade only seem logical to dump Noc considering his salary.
by SKanthony on Nov 14, 2009 3:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If we get Okafor, Noc is a good fit
No reason to trade him if we are back to winning. He fits well in our lineup and his salary no longer hurts us if we are abandoning the FA hunt. Unless we get offered a good deal for him, no reason to bleed talent.
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 3:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Utah is not adding long-term salary
Not right now, at least
by dprodigy19 on Nov 15, 2009 10:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Utah would take Noc for Harpring maybe?
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 3:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think they would and proposed that the other day
Harpring + the Knicks pick please :)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
either the Knicks pick or one of their good youngin's
Fesenko, Maynor, etc.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 4:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
getting Maynor just to continue the > jokes with him on our own team would be funny and maybe ironic, but not sure on that one.
I wanted to adopt, but all the good looking babies were taken
by joeytothelimit on Nov 14, 2009 5:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can see Harping + Utah pick, but not the Knicks one
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.-1984 George Orwell.
by tomkanti on Nov 15, 2009 8:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I worry about getting rid of Noc
until we know Cisco is going to be 100%
by ElRonToro on Nov 14, 2009 3:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Its true
wrist ligament damage. Its possible he may never really recover (possible)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
COME ON!
who needs K-MArt…. that wimp caan’t play D and Okeafor is a perfect fit for the kings’ aside of his contract.
by johnnyfive916 on Nov 14, 2009 3:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The only other negative
I can think of would be that he is essentially a black-hole on offense… regarding Ball-Movement. basketbawful.com Often refers to how he does not particularly acquire assists at an even average rate.
Basically Okafor puts up a shot if he touches the ball in the post.
However, he finishes at an above average rate so I suppose that you would rather have Okafor doing what he does well (scoring at an above average rate) than trying to force him to do something that he does not do well (passing).
I do think this makes us an above average defensive team and a for sure Top-Flight rebounding team.
I would do this trade… We may not make the playoffs this year… but we would compete every night and the versatility that this move presents is tremendous. Also, it gives us a very solid man-man defender and allows Thompson/Hawes to block shots off the help-side.
I like it.
Blessings.Love.Peace
by lifestyleforthesellout on Nov 14, 2009 3:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Curious about system
I would be curious how much of that is the system he played in. The Bobcats had almost no weapons for most of his career and needed him to shoot. I wonder if he has the skills to play more of a team game and if his below average assist rate is partially the effect of being in an extremely inefficient offense.
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 3:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Charlotte ran plays for him at all
…maybe the occasional kick out for his 16 foot jumper. Other than that, he gets those stats working his a$$ off for table scraps.
I don’t recall noticing him in the NO game.
by markdog333 on Nov 15, 2009 7:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he definitely is below average in his passing
but i think his D and scoring around the basket can make up for it. Besides, he would be the 5th option. Should’t have the ball that much. And he will be able to finish better with better teammates drawing opponents away.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 3:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Food for thought with Okafor
His career high for assists is 80. Jason Thompson last season had 93.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 3:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I have no idea how I feel about this possible trade
I’m all over the place on it. Thats a ton of money . . . .
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:52 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
My thoughts exactly
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Nov 14, 2009 4:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
He’s at least a top ten center, right? So, 11-14 millions seems like a pretty good deal for a top 10 center. He might be top 5.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He'll be in his 'big man' prime the whole time too
(sigh) I don’t know.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Noy only that
But you could argue this Kings team has more talent than his Bobcats team and really, more than the Hornets (except for CP3 of course)
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you have to argue that at all
This team does have more talent than any bobcats team. I guess Richardson/Felton/Wallace was a decent lineup as is Diaw/Wallace/Bell/Felton, but I would still take our guys over either one.
doh!!…did I just lose an argument with myself??
by markdog333 on Nov 15, 2009 7:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NBA.com has him listed under Forwards, go figure
But, under the PTS/REB/Assts catagory he’s listed as 41st among Forwards and JT is listed as 13th.
Hawes is listed as 19th in the same catagory with a score of 19.4. Okafor’s score is listed as 20.5. Although the listing numbers of 19th and 41st can’t becompared because there for different positions. The score is calculated the same way for both positions, so they are pretty close in total score. Okafor’s score of 20.5 puts him around 17th among centers and only 2 spaces ahead of Hawes.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
by HighTops on Nov 15, 2009 5:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If we want rebounding
The maybe we can look to the Blazers for Pyscbilla(sp?). I remember he had one of the best rebounding rates in the league.
I don’t know if Okefor’s back loaded 8 figure contract is worth it all. Especially when we will have to lock up JT and Hawes soon.
by DaPorts! on Nov 14, 2009 3:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hawes won't be on a new contract until 2011
He might not even get an extension. Any new contract with JT won’t happen until 2012. And any new contract with Tyreke Evans won’t happen until 2013.
So, relax.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 3:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That is how it starts but
I just don’t want any repeats of all the long bad contracts. I like Okeafor but that big back ended contract is not enticing.
by DaPorts! on Nov 14, 2009 3:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What do you think the hold up is?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 3:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Blazers probably want to keep Joel
Because Oden might be fragile
by avishai on Nov 14, 2009 3:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
right
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think a Prizbilla type role guy would be a perfect fit for the Kings
by Kevin.S on Nov 14, 2009 3:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So go out & find one
I like that idea. However the reality is not that simple.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 4:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Only real possibility is Gortat
And that’s only if Orlando decides to shed some salary, and they don’t look to be planning on it.
Big men who are neither old nor bad are nearly impossible to acquire.
by dprodigy19 on Nov 15, 2009 10:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A word of warning my friends
Okafor is at best an average defender,he gave it 0 effort against the Blazers last night and stunk pretty bad. He also has a rep of being not popular whith his team mates due to dogging at practice and his black hole style of offense,I would rather see the KIngs pass on this one
by southern oregon on Nov 14, 2009 3:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Rep?
I’ve never heard this before. Any articles or anything you can link to?
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Nov 14, 2009 3:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It was in one of the "mess in NO " articles,I will see if I can find it but for sure
Oden and Aldridge abused him last night and he looked like he just didn’t care
by southern oregon on Nov 14, 2009 3:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't want another malcontent
We are turning the boat and can’t afford a set back
by DaPorts! on Nov 14, 2009 3:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NO as a team doesn't look like they care
Great guy low moment. I mean Okafor always seemed to give great effort on some subpar Bobcat teams. NO is a mess right now and just fired their coach and replaced him with the GM. I wouldn’t read too much into Okafor giving mediocre effort last night. That team has quit on its ownership.
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 3:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's because George Shinn (hornets owner) is a piece of shit
I wouldn’t give that asshole gonorrhea.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 3:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Please keep the gonorrhea to yourself, don’t be spreading that crap
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 3:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You aren't George Shinn
Don’t worry.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 3:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But you said you wouldn't give Shinn gonorrhea
Ed isn’t Shinn, therefore he should be worried, right? He’d be safer from you if he was Shinn.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Nov 14, 2009 3:58 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
LOL
Got me.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 4:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You should be worried as well G
I think you’re closer to Seattle than I am, right?
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 4:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget
Pookey has a 1000 mile long schlong… You may have to worry after all…
by MustangMBS on Nov 15, 2009 7:15 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
No ed
Please forget it. TWSS
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
by pookeyguru on Nov 15, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but Pookey
is a big fan of the ass – man
"I make love to pressure" - Stephen Jackson
by Bluejohn on Nov 15, 2009 5:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess the rookie of the year honor was a sham.
The Hornets are in complete turmoil. Sound familiar. Last year our players didn’t put out 1/2 the effort they have this year by a long shot.
Its tough to play hard with no direction.
by nothingbutnet on Nov 14, 2009 3:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought about our team last year too
Good observation nbn
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 3:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Question
Can Okafor and Hawes play on the floor together?.
If yes, I say do it because we would have a perfect 3 man big rotation.
If not I vote no.
by ElRonToro on Nov 14, 2009 3:27 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Part of why I like the trade. JT and Okafor would be sweet, as will Hawes & Okafor. Okafor’s ability to play both PF & C makes him a good fit
Is my banana fluffy enough?
by 27freethrows on Nov 14, 2009 3:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I think we better keep our young guys and let them play, a trade won’t put us in the Finals or in the Playoffs, let the kids play, we have some great chemistry in these young guys, they’re playing wonderful. If Okafor can play together with Hawes and adjust to the style of play then it’s fine with me, otherwise, no Okafor please.
by Kreuz on Nov 14, 2009 3:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The bigger question
Can Okafor and Brockman play on the floor together?
OK, just kidding :)
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 3:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
dont think that would be a problem either
not much offense though
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 4:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That was funny. But I think they could, and we'd outrebound teams by 20 if they were out there at the same time.
Not that we’d win or anything.
33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.
by JETisKing on Nov 14, 2009 10:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Another Amick Fishing Trip?
Sam Amick of The Bee reports the Kings are discussing an Emeka Okafor-Kenny Thomas trade with the Hornets.
Hasn’t Amick predicted 20 of the last two Kings deals? A lot of these “proposed deals” end up being empty talk. If a deal does get done, though, I am sure Amick can give us a pretty good writeup.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 3:41 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He also stressed in his blog post that it's all discussion
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I trust anything Amicks says
100 times more than what any of the guys at ESPN do
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Empty Talk
Um, that’s how trade proposals work. One side proposes a deal, the other side might counteroffer, both sides discuss and consider, and either a deal happens or it doesn’t. More often than not, deals don’t happen. Don’t blame same for reporting on the process of how NBA trades work.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Nov 14, 2009 3:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
*
“same” should have ben “Sam”
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Nov 14, 2009 4:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Depends
whether they are actually “talks” or just rumors of same.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 4:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sam's report
Say the Kings are considering the offer that the Hornets made. If there’s an offer out there, I don’t understand where the controversy is.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Nov 14, 2009 4:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't either CC
I don’t really get what Sam did here that is so unusual. Reporters report this stuff. So do blogs. What’s the problem?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 4:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My point
These prospective deals rarely get done, and often aren’t even discussed.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure sounds like the Hornets came to us with a proposal
but hard to know
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I mean, why in Gods name
would we think a guy they just traded for was available? I think they came to us.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think CC is saying that he thinks
Sam made up the rumor. Maybe he’s been watching the last season of “The Wire”.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 4:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ohhhh -
Huh? What?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He said
Another Amick Fishing Trip?
and
These prospective deals rarely get done, and often aren’t even discussed.
(emphais mine)
Which looks to me like he thinks Sam is making this up. “Fishing” and the trade has not even been “discussed”(by the Kings and Hornets).
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 4:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Is this the same source?
That told Amick Artest would be traded for Bass and Stackhouse?
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't trust the beat writer for the team
that is usually the first to break any kind of news either
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 5:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
BS antenna has to go up
when the word “source” is mentioned.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 5:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So you think he's making this up?
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 5:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not necessarily.
His source might be, or might just be passing along something secondhand.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 5:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
If you don’t want to believe news based on an unnamed source being quoted, then you might want to steer clear of NBA coverage, or any sports or news coverage for that matter.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Nov 14, 2009 6:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously
Most trade rumors come from unnamed sources, including the ones that eventually go through. Sources remain unnamed because they can get in trouble for saying anything. Reporters that use them get a lot of shit and for no good reason. There are way more proposed trades that get turned down than there are trades that go through. So when anonymous sources share their info most of the time they will be wrong.
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 6:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They usually leak sources because
the team is interested to see about fan reaction. Especially if it’s coming from the Kings.
I would not be surprised if someone from Kings management is staking out sites such as this one, and others, just to see what the fans complaints are.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 6:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
pookeyliscious!
oh, I mean I don’t think that’s true.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 6:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha!
The lady doth protest too much. You must be one of the Kings spies :)
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 6:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
John Whisenhunt
You still think his suggestion is idiotic?
(Hope I spelled his name right)
by bignerd on Nov 14, 2009 6:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What did Whisenant say?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 6:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was giving a possible example of management leaking out information to gauge a possible fan reaction.
IMO, I thought that is what the Kings did a few summers ago when the Maloofs were interested in hiring Whisenant.
by bignerd on Nov 14, 2009 6:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah a good point Nerd
I didn’t think about it that way, but that’s probably what they did do. Although, it seemed to me in the aftermath of that that it was more the Maloof’s trying to convince Geoff Petrie and he said why not Eric Musselman instead?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 6:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I have no problem having my idiocy stack up against yours VB
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 6:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the source
i’ve noticed when it is a “team source” it does not usually go through, but if it is a “league” source there is a much higher probability.
by markdog333 on Nov 15, 2009 7:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It be best if the Kings took some time before making a "big" trade
If it was up to me I wait until the nba game became “repetitive” for all the rookies to gauge what the Kings have. A team can have only so many scorers and Emeka Okafor could end up as a bad fit for his contract.
by Kevin.S on Nov 14, 2009 3:43 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i dont consider Okafor a scorer really
a great defensive rebounder and good man to man defender. His 14 points could go down and he would still be effective for the Kings.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 4:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bird in the hand...
…is worth more than two in the bush.
TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY and we’re a playoff caliber roster when healthy.
by Smills91 on Nov 14, 2009 3:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm part of the bandwagon...
…of Petrie using available cap flexibility to make a trade rather than to overpay for a free agent next summer (or the summer after).
This deal would make sense in a lot of ways…the team gets a solid defensive presence in the frontcourt to compliment their new tougher attitude. This, and the Kings recent play, would probably get some more butts in the seat – as you could make the case that this team could make a playoff run in the next season or two. Get the excitement back at Arco, make some money…and the amount you’re paying Okafor won’t be as painful down the road.
And if Tyreke ends up being a super-duper star rather than just the star we expect, you’d have to think that the pieces around him in two or three seasons (JT, Kevin, Omri, Okafor primarily) might be enough to get them into the upper echelon.
But man, that’s a lot of money for a guy that doesn’t seem to have improved from a quick start to his career.
Ultimately, it’s a risk, but might be a risk worth taking. At worst, you’ve still improved your team (IMO) without getting older. But you may have hurt yourself long-term on the cap front.
I guess that’s my long-winded way of saying I’M IN.
by otis29 on Nov 14, 2009 4:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
there are a lot of teams looking to challenge the size of title-contenders
so, if okafor can be had for expiring contracts, then maybe the kings can turn KTEC into something more valuable, like a smaller expiring contract and more draft picks.
and i wonder why this was leaked. maybe the kings prefer to facilitate a 3-way deal.
for example, the bulls can’t trade jerome james to the hornets for okafor; however, they can trade jerome james for kenny thomas; and kenny thomas can be traded for okafor. (and i don’t think this will actually happen as the Bulls are hoping to free up enough cap space for a run at D-Wade)
"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."
by ignign*kt on Nov 14, 2009 4:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Im not a hornet's fan
but i get the impression that they’re in a similar situation to where we were before.
bad financial situation – some bad contracts in peja (sorry dude!), posey and mo pete. . and they have too many vets to think they’re going “to grow”. . plus .they’re over the luxury tax (judging by atthehive?). . .
okafor hasnt quite paid off for them. . .posey definitely didnt pay off.
with CP3 out and their record already sucking, there just in dire straits.
whether or not to pull the trigger on this trade i dunno.. but to me it looks like they’re in desperation mode
by Spoz of Oz on Nov 14, 2009 4:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Get CP3!
;) :) :)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
KT for CP3, I like that one, but man that contract :)
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 5:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, I could live with it :p)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't know
I think it all hinges on whether you think this team plus Emeka Okafor is playoff bound. I think it probably turns the team into a fringe playoff team. But if the trade goes through you’re basically out of ways to drastically improve the team. You’re probably looking at a middling draft pick and possibly (but not likely) the MLE for the next few years. I think going through with this would basically consign the team to mediocrity.
I like it in theory, but he’s just overpaid, and this team is already past its limit on overpaid, unmovable veterans.
by nbrans on Nov 14, 2009 4:16 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
That's how I feel as well
I think Okafor makes the Kings a playoff team, but not a championship contender. Making the playoffs is cool, but the ultimate goal is to win a championship.
"I'm too weird ta live but much too rare ta die"
by aKingisBored on Nov 15, 2009 6:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
step by step
That’s how rebuilding projects like this occur. Of course Emeka Okafor doesn’t by himself automatically make the Kings (or any team) a championship contender. There’s only about 4 players in the NBA who could do that.
But we have a major problem with interior defense. We also have a problem with rebounding. That can’t continue if we’re going to get on the road to the promised land, and Okafor addresses both of these areas nicely.
From there, Tyreke Evans, Jason Thompson and Omri Casspi will have to grow as players, and there’s some real indication that can happen.
"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)
by Mucho Moss on Nov 15, 2009 11:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Since this is a money deal, I'm just curious what's to stop teams by doing money deals outside the nba.
Interleague financial purchases and trades happen all the time everywhere else. What’s the technicality that the hornets can’t sell Okafor’s contract to a euroleague team.
by Kevin.S on Nov 14, 2009 4:17 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think there'd need to be a collective bargaining agreement in place.
"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."
by ignign*kt on Nov 14, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No comment
Just, no comment. This is too stupid for me to even contemplate how to answer appropriately.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 4:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because the contract...
is legally constructed for the player to play in the NBA for an NBA team. A player is not about to sign a contract to play with the Hornets and then be shipped off to Barcelona, Spain.
And the league would never allow teams to ship off a player to Siberia because the team was unhappy with the player’s production.
I am curious what inter-league purchases and trades do you have in mind?
by bench_blob on Nov 14, 2009 4:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I have no trades in mind
It’s so obvious teams like the Suns, Clippers, Hornets and Bobcats priorities are to cut cost over talent that I’m wondering why a buyout of a player hasn’t happened yet.
by Kevin.S on Nov 14, 2009 4:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
buyouts save NO money cap-wise
Unless in the rare instance a player is willing to get bought out for less – which really never happens.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Most players accept a 5-10% loss
I remember part of why the Marbury fiasco was so bad is that after the Knicks asked him to take a large paycut he refused to accept any buyout other than his full contract.
GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
by iashwash on Nov 14, 2009 11:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In the same vein
Not having a deep understanding of the forces at play in the NBA, I just really don’t understand why things are set up so that your contract is your contract and that every time you move teams, that contract isn’t revised, or a new contract drawn up. It just seems like such an inefficient system economically. I guess I’m also thinking of the ‘rest of the world’ model used in Eurobasket and soccer as a system that makes more sense.
by bartenpa on Nov 15, 2009 8:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta love the efficiency....
…that UNIONS cause.
by Smills91 on Nov 15, 2009 10:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Go ahead
and imagine what the world would be like without unions.
by thelettere on Nov 15, 2009 6:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Would someone with some patience
look and see how he has done against the better big men in the league? I’d ignore this year’s number as the Hornets are in disarray.
How has he matched up against Jefferson, Bynum, gasol, Oden, Kaman etc..? The guys from teams we need to beat?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Last Year
vs Portland 20pts / 8reb / 2 blks / 64% FG% per game
vs. LAL 15.5 / 10 / 2 / 56.3%
vs. MN 16.5 / 7.5 / 2.5 / 59.1%
he sucked against Denver and Houston
reference: http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/o/okafoem01/splits/2009/
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 4:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder what was going on in Denver and Houston. Was Yao playing then?
His best game was against Washington, 29 points 18 boards. By the way his full name is Chukwuemeka Noubuisi Okafor. Also, are we collecting Nigerians? Isn’t Ime Udoka from there too?
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 5:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ime Udoka is from Portland
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry. He is of Nigerian descent though, no?
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 5:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I remember that from the toughness article
GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
by iashwash on Nov 14, 2009 11:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mind if I use this in my write up 4-3?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I just used their filter online
the basketball-reference people did all the hard work, go nuts :)
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 5:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Heh
I went another way anyway.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 5:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sort of.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 5:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Even though he only scored 2 points in Denver on Nov 11 last year he still had 8 defensive boards and 4 blocks
not sure what his problem shooting was, but everyone has off nights. he played 30 mins and shot it only 5 times though.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Nov 14, 2009 5:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We would need to understand if we get Okafor we are not getting him for his O anyway. He is a slightly better offensive and slightly worse defensive version of Ben Wallace back in his Piston days. He would bring toughness, rebounding, D and the ability to finish; however, he’s not a player who can create his own shot unless he is in an extreme mismatch.
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 5:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
2nd question
With a three man frontcourt rotation of JT, Okafur and Hawes (with some Brockness) and a guard lineup of Martin, Tyreke, Cisco and Beno + Noce + Casspi/Donte’ at the SF
Who exactly waaay outclasses us talent and depth-wise?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
...plus Petrie's deft drafting moving forward...
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Nov 14, 2009 4:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tell me how good Tyreke and JT are going to be
and that question is answerable.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
JT is going to be a solid double double guy
and a marginal All-Star a few times.
Tyreke??
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If we get Okefor
presumably our chances of landing a superstar via the lottery go down. So. you’re always going to be outclassed on superstars if Tyreke isn’t one, if we get Okefor.
Of course, there are no guarantees we’d get one if we don’t do the trade, but undoubtedly the chances are worse.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 5:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Its starting to look like we'll (only?) be picking 6-10 to me
for whatever thats worth
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And looking at next year's draft
That’s not a bad place to pick. WE also have some dude named Geoff Petrie making the picks. That helps a bit I think
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
More likely 10-20
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 5:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
after adding Okafor I'd think that in the teens will be a sure thing
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
we are due to have a lottery ball bounce our way
by markdog333 on Nov 15, 2009 7:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
did the last lottery teach you nothing?
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 8:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It taught me that having the best odds means nothing
therefore having the worst odds must mean everything. :)
There's nothing to fear but everything.
by elfboy_ on Nov 15, 2009 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LTTG, marginal All-Stars don't grow on trees
anymore than 20/10 players do.
"I make love to pressure" - Stephen Jackson
by Bluejohn on Nov 15, 2009 5:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's make a quick comparison with the Blazers
In the future it would be
Reke vs. Miller
Kevin vs. Roy
Noc vs. Webster
JT vs. Alridge
Okafor vs, Oden
Bench: Hawes, Cisco, Omri, Beno, Donte, Brockman vs. Priz, Blake, Outlaw, Fernandez, Bayless
That comparison looks pretty even to me.
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 4:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Crap, I don't know, I keep going back-and-forth on this
My initial reaction was “Sweet, there’s our third big, we’re good to go”, plus I’ve always sort of been an Okafor fan since I had him on my fantasy team when he was a rookie.
As I was reading this thread, other considerations came to mind; mainly, I’m wondering if Okafor is enough of an upgrade in our starting lineup over Hawes to warrant the huge contract. If Hawes then becomes a beast of a sixth man and our frontline is the envy of the entire league, will we be able to pay him enough to keep him or will we have to let him go? In a way, I feel like our best-case-scenario in adding Okafor would give us a window of being a contender only until Hawes gets his payday.
I guess I’m still holding-out hope that Hawes will someday fairly soon be better than Okafor and our Shock and Hawes frontline is the envy of the league, in which case we would give Spence and JT their paydays and move forward with our current core and look for other (much less expensive and restrictive ways) to get a third big that might not be quite as productive as Emeka, but will be enough to get us into that elusive top tier.
I really don’t know. I suppose the only thing we can all agree on is that it would be a bit of a gamble. I’m not sure if the Maloofs care much for gambling.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Nov 14, 2009 4:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I just said the same earlier
I’m all over the place on this idea. I really need to know if he can have those double double games against good competition or its padding from bad teams.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's a 17.5-18 PER guy
that’s not going to be entirely against bad teams.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 4:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Even if he can
I think an equally pertinent question is “By some point next season, will Spence be having double double games against the good teams?”
If so, is adding Okafor worth his contract? Or could we just be excited about our Shock and Hawes and then get a more-than-decent third big for less money?
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Nov 14, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Spence will always struggle to keep his RB
better than 1 every 3.6 minutes. I see him as a 15-18 point guy and 9 RBs if he gets to 36 mpg. Very solid, but still not the Defender or RBer Okafor is, but they could pair together nicely
by ElRonToro on Nov 14, 2009 5:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sold on Emeka, no deal.
Ba-da
by Ba-Da Bing on Nov 14, 2009 4:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Jamba Juicy Rumor...
I am on the fence on this trade. On one hand, Hawes development has been disappointing. He can still be good, but he is not showing the growth to his game that the organization had to have hoped to see. if we are molding our team around toughness and defense, which I think we are, then Emeka fits.
On the other hand, I would like to see Emeka score more out of the low post, but he was averaging 18 points a game, and not 14 over his career, he probably wouldn’t be available. Emeka seems rather mechanical and limited in the way he plays. I think he has reached the ceiling of his ability. He’s 27 years old, at the peak of his skills, and he is not exactly tearing up the league. And for 60 million, I would like my low post player be worthy of a double team.
Other points to consider IMO are:
The Fakers are still the team to beat in the West. Bynum and Gasol and Odom are ridiculously long in the paint. We add a player like Emeka we really shore up our competitiveness down low. Blazers and Nuggets aren’t exactly slouches at the ‘4’ and ‘5’ spots either.
Lets say hypothetically the Raptors are going to lose Bosh for nothing, a strong possibility, this offseason. Emeka could be a trade chip to make a run at Bosh in a sign and trade.
If we do this trade, we are instantly a playoff contender IMO. Who would have fathomed that possibility even one week ago?
The more I think about this I think this deal is a PASS. Unless it is a no-brainer, I think we will be rewarded for being patient and pragmatic, instead of rolling the dice on a cap-killing slight to moderate upgrade.
by bench_blob on Nov 14, 2009 5:03 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Here's the thing
Okafor brings EXACTLY what this team has been lacking for SOOOO Long. Shotblocking, even MORE rebounding, and a guy that can CLOG the middle and defend the bigger centers in the league. He’s signed on for 4 more years after this one(I don’t count this one, cuz we’re paying Kenny this year regardless). If we SIGNED a player in FA with that money(the 10-15 million we could potentially have)consider this, it’s AT LEAST a 5 year deal for the TYPE of player we’re targeting – so dealing for Okafor cuts a year off of that financial committment. Second, look around at the free agents, after Bosh, Bron and Wade is there a single player that would fit WITH this Kings roster AND have the same amount of impact as Okafor? Amare? Boozer? JJ? Maybe, but I don’t think they bring what we NEED. Okafor does. I think this is a deal you HAVE to make to make that stride forward. I see Okafor as LOCKED up for the next 4 years, not a noose around our necks(and if that did happen, he’ll probably be in the last year or two of his contract anyways.
by Smills91 on Nov 14, 2009 5:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree to a point roster-wise
But what we’ve really been lacking is a STAR player. Do we have one in infancy in Tyreke?
Impossible to tell just yet. I think you Must have a Star (or two) to be a repeat contender.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Still
We aren’t bringing a star player here via free agency. And as our team is playing better we may be preparing ourselves for another run of middling to late lottery picks, where you are unlikely to find a star. So the best alternative route to getting another star player is by having talent and commodities to trade. After this season, KT ceases to be a tradable commodity, so if we do not take advantage of his contract we are essentially bleeding tradeable assets. However, adding Okafor gives us a core of Okafor, Martin, JT, Reke, Hawes, Omri, Noc, WaBeno, and Cisco along with 2 draft picks every year. Those are a lot of tradeable commodities to use to upgrade talent. I would argue a better collection of talent than what the Celtics had to offer the year they were able to bring in KG and Allen.
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 5:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They had a top five pick to trade
and we won’t if we do this deal – but your point is valid
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Then only 3 more
Cause the last year is an ETO.
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 5:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For effs sake people,
HAWES IS ONLY 21!!
by avishai on Nov 14, 2009 5:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
no doubt
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So, that's perfect
In 5 years when Okafor’s deal is done, Hawes will be in his prime. ;p
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 5:21 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
you laugh but...
that’s actually a pretty solid plan
the only downside being 2 years of overlap where both Okefor and Spencer would be getting paid well would be tough.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
very
Of course that last year he’d be an ‘expiring’ as well with something left in the tank you’d think.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I don't disagree
Just thought it was funny. My hunch is, however, that if Okefor ends up a King, Spencer doesn’t come back for another contract.
by otis29 on Nov 14, 2009 5:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
probably right
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He'd be an RFA...
…so it’s the Kings DECISION whether they want him back or not. Which he’d be an EXCELLENT complement to Okafor.
by Smills91 on Nov 14, 2009 6:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But Okafor's last year is a team option I believe
Did I misunderstand?
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 5:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sham Sports has it as an ETO which is a player option
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 5:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Its His option
you know what that means
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, maybe
he’ll play so well over the next 4 years, that 14 mil will seem like chicken scratch and he’ll opt out :)
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 5:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
pretty standard $$ for a good Center
David Lee will get that same money more or less as has been mentioned elsewhere and he plays no defense.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
I mean we are talking about a big who will be in his prime for the entire contract and who does exactly what you want a big to do – rebound and play D, without taking anything off the table offensively.
by SPTSJUNKIE on Nov 14, 2009 6:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
EXCELLENT point
David Lee or Emeka Okafor? give me the true center than plays some defense!
by Smills91 on Nov 14, 2009 6:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Is the trade with George ZImmer? Y'all want a guarantee?
Look up the cremasteric reflex.
Give an opinion, make a decision. It is okay, Geoff and Jason are going to do what they think is best anyway (pending Maloof approval).
No one knows if this would work. We are talking about last season’s worst team, which may be this year’s least talented squad, and is young. Predictions range from 15-21 wins from the ESPN-experts, up to 30+ by the most optimistic here.
This is an upgrade in talent, a defensive presence but a large cost that will hamper (maybe influence is better) any near future FA deals. It is a huge commitment on cap space and to some extent team solvency.
My take is: if the money is there, I think this is one of the best deals around, a starting 5 with solid numbers, good durability, good attitude history, and a guy in his career prime. He is no superstar but is getting what will be the future of superstar contracts. You give up Kenny Thomas. Do it, please.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 5:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This puts us at what $52-3 mil in salary next year
Just where we are now? Hmmmm That pretty much just leaves mid-level money left assuming no Noce for expirings deal.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if from a business perspective
you’d want to wait and see what happens to revenue in the short term.
The team is on a high with (what we hope) to be a bright future – but are the Kings making more money?
If you’re not generating revenue even when the teams on the rise you’d have to wonder whether bringing in another huge contract of a good-decent-but-not-awesome player is going to help.
As in, would Okafor change it dramatically such that you’re going to draw crowds in? I’d be interested to ask any of you guys who are Sacto natives what’s keeping the fans who used to go from coming now? Is it the winning or a draw card gem of a player that people want to watch? (most likely an overlap between the two?).
Most of us (if not all) are absolutely stoked at the fact that we’re 1 game over .500. . .thats because we’ve had low expectations. . .u bring in Okafor and i wonder if all of a sudden expectations change from .500 being awesome to .500 being crap and we should be able to hang with Portland/Lakers/.
If the Kings are managing to make money from becoming the rags-to-riches-feel-good-cinderella team who people never thought would make it to .500. . .i actually think i’d hold off on Okafor, and keep going thru the draft to build.
But like other people have said already. . i cant really make up my mind on this one.
by Spoz of Oz on Nov 14, 2009 5:25 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Wins will bring more fans
Okafer would maybe (maaaybe) get us into marginal playoff contention. Its starting to look like we’ll be picking 6-10, Okafur would get us to the 8-10th spot in the West. Thats picking 14-17 (or something)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lttg, quick question
not bashing or anything but I want to know if you do it on purpose or not. You know you’re always mispelling players names right? Okafer, Okafur? You call Lamar Odom, Lamar Odem too? Jsut out of curiosity
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 5:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just rattling it off
not sending any messages
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
All good
I always wondered, that’s it
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
by edm7 on Nov 14, 2009 5:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you can't have it both ways
to wait for the team to generate money before doing a deal – means a deal will not happen for a very long time.
If the deal is on the table – it has a time limit. My only preference on waiting is wait until the current win streak is over (next game?) before pulling the trigger so the first loss isn’t hung on the deal.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 7:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure there is a time limit
Who else besides the Kings can make this deal?
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 15, 2009 8:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
every deal has a time limit
and every deal has it’s detractors – those who wish it never happened v. those who wish it had.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 8:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You didn't answer my question
Who else besides the Kings can make this deal? Do we have the Hornets over the barrel? If so, maybe they can sweeten the deal.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 15, 2009 9:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't answer your question because it is unanswerable
not only don’t we know whom else can make this deal based on salary reduction (as this is a salary dump a lâ Shinn and nothing else for the Hornets) we can’t know what some other teams’ version of Kenny Thomas is. Is it Carlos Boozer? David Lee?
Sweeten the deal? One of our core players for your expiring contract – but it is going to cost you long term – any sweeter, talent speaking, and we are going to have to factor in some insulin.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 10:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
More like
NO: We’re drowning here: can you please take some pity on us and help us out and take this overpaid guy who we’ve lost confidence in after just 10 games off our hands?
US: Sorry, but you’re going to have to sweeten the deal to make taking on that bloated contract a little more practical.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 15, 2009 10:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Could it possibly be that California has one of the worst economies in the country?
And the first thing some people cut back on our things like overpriced NBA tickets, etc.
by VirginiaBlue on Nov 14, 2009 6:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's certainly a big factor
and the price of tickets is no help. Not sure how many $10 (really $12.50) tickets they sell ever game, but they should probably increase that by another 1,000 and scale their other prices down as well.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 15, 2009 8:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate that they call them $10 tickets
and charge that stupid facility fee. If you cannot pay less than $12.50 for a ticket it is not a $10 ticket.
by mayfieldcol on Nov 15, 2009 3:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't like it...
OK, so I’ve been reading here now for years but this one has me commenting for the first time.
I’m not a fan of this deal.
First, Okafor has taken how many games to write his ticket out of town? That’s right, 10. And that’s even considering his new coach is apparently the guy who traded for him. Reports already surfaced that he wasn’t winning over teammates because he didn’t practice when he could have in the preseason (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=mc-okaforhornets102209&prov=yhoo&type=lgns). Combine that with the fact that he seems to be a little bit of a black hole on offense, can’t consistently hit a mid-range jumper which is important if J.T. gets touches down low and Tyreke and Martin get into the lane, plus has the obvious contract issues and that alone makes me vote no.
Further, while I agree we aren’t getting Wade, James, or Bosh, I’m not sure we can count ourselves out when it comes to guys like, say, David Lee. Would you rather have Lee for a similar and possibly smaller contract? It seems like we might be in play for 2nd tier guys, especially if we play somewhat competitively.
Also, while we may not get a team to make a Pau Gasol type deal, there could be something out there later in the year that we don’t know about yet. And even if it doesn’t happen this year, cap space can be used in a trade in the offseason when teams seem more willing to deal. So we don’t need Kenny Thomas’ expiring contract to essentially use his expiring contract.
I find it hard to believe that Okafor is our absolute option.
by M_Shady on Nov 14, 2009 5:29 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good argument
DLee, whatever you think of his rebounding, doesn’t play defense at all. So there’s that.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yup...the last few years we've had little to no interior D
by ucla06 on Nov 14, 2009 5:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
let's just say - instead of DLee - it is Milwaukee on the phone and the are waving Andrew Bogut
or the Warriors and it is Andres Beidrins. Who of the 3 do you want (I am too lazy to search every team for a high dollar average or better 5, you get the idea).
If you don’t grab Okafor – and he is not a superstar but a known solid starter – who do you all expect to get? You can wait it out, draft a big in the lottery, or…
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 7:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just so you know, the Warriors will not give up Biedrins for nothing unless he's in a wheelchair
It’s fun to deal in hypotheticals of what players might be available, but limiting the players involved to those that could reasonably be moved in a deal like this makes a whole lot more sense.
The amount of times that a team has been willing to give up a starting quality big man who hasn’t peaked for financial relief in today’s NBA could be counted on one hand.
by dprodigy19 on Nov 15, 2009 10:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, its a good argument
we are giving up options. For what its worth though, on this team, I’d rather have Okefor than David Lee, and I’m not convinced Lee will be that much cheaper.
Its not a slam dunk we should do it, a case can definitely be made for flexibility and something better will present itself.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 5:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
David Lee v. Emeka Okafor.
Hey, I’ll be the first to admit that I am a bonafied David Lee lover but…. his offensive numbers are horribly inflated by the fact that he plays in a Mike D’ Antoni system. His rebound numbers are great but so were Olden Polynese’s- a big man on a team with no other big man can get 5-6 rebounds a game just off of missed free-throws. Lee is a very good rebounder but he plays little to no defense. Okafor is an equal or better rebounder with amazing position defense and shot blocking skills. Add to this a starting salary of 10 million that Lee is going to get as an unrestricted FA and I think these two players are a lot more even than you think. Now add to this that 10 teams are probably lining up to pay Lee this off-season when the stars re-sign with their current clubs.
What does all of this mean? Emeka Okafor might be a King because he has no choice, David Lee has a choice and hense will never be a King.
No law when it comes to me.
I let you type critics write and I just keep it hood.
That will never change.
I am not kissing no ones ass because I'm in LA. Suck a cock.
-Ron Artest (e-mail exchange with Kyle Slavin)
by jjham15 on Nov 14, 2009 5:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
David Lee
I’m not sure I made my point really clear when I mentioned David Lee. I’m not necessarily saying David Lee is a great fit on this team and would be our best option, my point with him is that while we won’t be in play for the top free agents, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to think that we will be in play for some second tier guys who might be better values than Okafor. So we will have SOME options. Earlier comments seemed to say that since we probably won’t get James, Wade, or Bosh, we might as well scrap free agency. I don’t think that we should eliminate the idea of free agency because King James isn’t coming. Just one of my thoughts that for me added up to not being thrilled with the idea of Okafor.
by M_Shady on Nov 14, 2009 5:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No one is coming from NY to Sac
no one in demand anyway. The point is, do we have a chance at a good big man other than by trade? I doubt it. I’d suggest Tyrus thomas might be available from the Bulls but I can’t think of anyone else.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think
David Lee is going to get $10 million a year when the economy sucks, attendance is dropping, salaries are down and he is competing with a big class of prospective free agents.
I think the megastars like LeBron will continue to get big money, but the non All-Stars are going to be looking at deals in the $7 mil-$10 mil range.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 15, 2009 8:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Teams always find a way to overpay
and that’s the situation we find ourselves with Okafor. Will we be paying for someone else’s spending?
There's nothing to fear but everything.
by elfboy_ on Nov 15, 2009 5:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How about Okafor and Collison for Thomas and Hawes?
Not that I’m giving up on Hawes but I think we save some money here and get at the least a solid backup point guard at least in Collision (maybe even a starter). I think we save some money too swapping Hawes for Collison. IMO Hawes is a backup on a playoff team.
by ucla06 on Nov 14, 2009 5:33 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
We have a back-up PG
though I’m a fan of Collison
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hawes is now
but he is 21; you can’t forget that when thinking long term.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 5:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bad deal
Now all of a sudden your front court is less versatile than pre-deal and you’ve also wasted the Kenny Thomas chip while gaining a third-string point guard. Nope.
If the Okafor deal makes sense, it only does so in the context of having three capable big men that you can rotate.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 5:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yep
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 5:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
You give them nothing else and maybe ask for a 2nd rounder.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 5:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
unless we can get Collison without giving up Hawes. Which might be kinda feasible since they save $40 million
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 10:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually K9 and Sergio for Collison and Okafor works in the trade machine, and basically we are just picking up 1 extra year on a contract with Collison
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 15, 2009 10:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yup...Hawes is young but has a history of knee problems
I might be the minority but I like Evans at the 2 spot like Dwade but getting his share of time running the show.
by ucla06 on Nov 14, 2009 5:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Agree with original Ziller post
For this year: I can’t even imagine the defensive potential of Evans, Noce, JT and Okafor together as starters. The tissue label would definitely be history.
Evans may not be there yet defensively, but he’s well on his way.
I think they become contenders for the 8th spot this year with this move. Utah and New Orleans look like they have big probs.
There I said it. Hopeful thinking.
by VirginiaBlue on Nov 14, 2009 6:13 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
How is Oke a difference maker
What in his NBA track record makes anyone think this guy is a difference maker?
by BeAll on Nov 14, 2009 6:15 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
He'd be a missing piece
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 6:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NBA Rule #2,495
“You’re NBA track record cannot be taken too seriously if you’ve ever played for the Charlotte Bobcats”
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 6:17 PM PST up reply actions 7 recs
I admit I don't know his game super well
But from what Ive seen, he plays solid D, he’s a strong rebounder and shot blocker, and overall intimidating presence in the paint. One of biggest problems on D is interior; even though I think JT is coming along nicely if he could avoid fouls and stay on his feet a little more. He jumps a lot on defense.
by VirginiaBlue on Nov 14, 2009 6:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Can you imagine
a guy like Tony Parker getting into the paint on us and having to deal with Jason Thompson AND Emeka Okafor
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 6:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we need to consider,
that by becoming a possible playoff contender, we are much more apt to keep the Kings in Sactown.
Can the team really wait 2 more years?
Free agency will be a bust for this team. Marque players want to play in big markets due to endorsement deals.
by nothingbutnet on Nov 14, 2009 6:17 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Now THAT
I couldn’t agree with more
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 6:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention...
…the DRAFT is ALWAYS a crap shoot. You HOPE you get a player as good as Okafor in the draft. Here we have just that.
by Smills91 on Nov 14, 2009 6:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus Petrie drafting
so we’d get Okafor and a Petrie pick anyway. Hell, letting him pick near the top makes it less of a challenge for him
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 6:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't discount the free agent drawing power of Folsom Lake Ford!
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 6:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
and Cache Creek Casino.
I heard Eddie Money is playing there!
by nothingbutnet on Nov 14, 2009 6:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You'd think that the Maloofs could draw bigger name free agents
simply by saying “We’re going to put a giant picture of you on the side of the Palms Casino and name a suite after you.” I’d sign with the Kings for that alone… and a VIP booth at the Playboy Club
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 6:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think they already get the VIP booth
but funny
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 6:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure how well they play that card,
but I often wondered that myself.
They need to do a better job on cross marketing.
by nothingbutnet on Nov 14, 2009 6:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Going forward how does Okafor rate as a big man?
KG, Duncan, Shaq, Sheed . . . possibly Yao and Brand could be out of the league or vaguely ineffective in 2/3 years. Where does Okafor rank amongst the next crop of NBA big men?
by bignerd on Nov 14, 2009 6:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Boozer is unrestricted free agent
His game is superior to Emeka, and the low post presence we need. 27 years old, active, talented, Kings would have a shot at him as a next level FA. I would rather commit $50 million to a player like Boozer, plus another Petrie lottery pick, than Emeka and a middle first rounder.
Last 5 games for Boozer
20 points
12 rebs
64% FG
by bench_blob on Nov 14, 2009 6:46 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
He's a terrible defender
sign me up for Okefor who doesn’t require the ball a ton (Tyreke and Kevin need the ball plenty) over Boozer for this team.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 6:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
a related question: do you think it is easier/better to field a defensive team and acquire offensive firepower
or the other way around?
The weakest link for these Kings to be defense oriented is the middle. JT is not a shot blocker, Hawes is growing into whatever role he is growing into. Oh, and then you have Sean May and Kenny Thomas.
Why the trepidation?
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 7:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think there's trepidation
because the easiest way to mess up your salary structure is pay a lot of money for mediocrity.
You only get a couple $12+mil guys on your team, there should be a lot of careful consideration whether or not Okefor will fit the team well before we make this deal.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes, but the time to decide is now
flip a coin, wring your hands – second guessing is par for the course – but the decision is – take the chance of being much better right away, or just take the slower, less expensive risk of getting better through the draft.
Who else will be available? Will there a better deal next week? month? summer? probably. but maybe not.
Here is my guarantee: (non)Buyer’s remorse will be evident either way – whether they do the deal or they don’t.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 7:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And,
unless we trade up in the draft we will not fix this problem.
Centers usually take more time to develop than the other positions.
by nothingbutnet on Nov 14, 2009 7:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that say about point guards too...
look at this year’s crop – Jennings, Tyreke, Flynn, Ty Lawson all are performing admirably on winning (oops, not TWolves) teams.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 6:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I watched Emeka tonight against the Hawks
…he did not impress me. The Hawks were scoring at will in the paint. Emeka doesn’t have a low post game or passing skills. He’s not even as big as JT, at least as far as I could tell. He runs the court well, but just going through the motions. Obviously his stats are respectable, but he stopped improving as a player. Hornets don’t want him after 10 games. To me, thats two red flags.
Boozer is not a terrible defender. He’s slightly below average, granted. But he demands a double team, he rebounds, he finishes, and he’s an intense team guy. I am not saying he is an ideal addition, but he would vastly improve our offensive spacing. He would take a lot of Hawes minutes, so its not like our defense would suffer dramatically.
by bench_blob on Nov 14, 2009 7:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What?
he’s an intense team guy
This couldn’t be any further from the truth. Boozer is a money grubbing whore who talked his way out of a final year in Cleavland so they could sign him to a long term deal only to jump ship and sign with Utah for more cash. Once in Utah, it took a mere 51 games before he checked out with a questionable injury (a hamstring pull) and got into media wars with the teams owner over the injury. The same injury continued into the next season forcing him to miss the first 49 games of the season- again, under questionable circumstances.
Boozer has shown that he is not a team guy. He doesn’t play defense at all and although I wouldn’t mind trading Kenny Thomas and Noccioni for him, it would strictly be to dump more salary. The Kings have offense, what they need is a big time defender. Okafor is expensive but what he brings is a consistent presence in the middle.
No law when it comes to me.
I let you type critics write and I just keep it hood.
That will never change.
I am not kissing no ones ass because I'm in LA. Suck a cock.
-Ron Artest (e-mail exchange with Kyle Slavin)
by jjham15 on Nov 14, 2009 9:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
also
Boozer won’t be signing with Sacramento. Or I guess I should say, the odds are very long.
Also, Okafor is bigger than JT. Emeka is about 10 lbs. heftier and he’s much longer. In fact I looked it up and Okafor has a freakin 7’4" wingspan!
"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)
by Mucho Moss on Nov 14, 2009 9:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Everybody on the Hornets is going through the motions.
I have no doubt that if Okafor was on the Kings, he’d play his heart out for Coach W and easily become one of the fan favorites.
33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.
by JETisKing on Nov 14, 2009 10:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Boozer an intense team guy?
He’s made it loud and clear that he’s in the NBA for the money, dude.
by CloudyEyes on Nov 16, 2009 12:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
But I don’t see the Kings winning a free agency bid for Boozer unless he’s stinks the rest of the season and no one else wants him.
by bignerd on Nov 14, 2009 6:49 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Because this simply must be posted here
I’ll link to it since it’s big: Best.Thing.Ever.
by dprodigy19 on Nov 15, 2009 10:28 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
LOL!
That’s great!
"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)
by Mucho Moss on Nov 16, 2009 12:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, lets do that
I’m sure he’ll jump at the $6 mil of cap we have to offer him in free agency!
by CloudyEyes on Nov 16, 2009 12:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A More Likely Scenario
Maybe I am wrong, but I think the economy is shifting the discussion and deepening the divide between haves and have nots. You see the empty seats all around the league, and I just think the flood of guys hitting the next market are not going to get paid like they think they are. Yes, that includes guys like David Lee.
In this scenario, Okafor is grossly overpaid, particularly for a second-tier market. What might be more likely if these rumors are remotely true is the Kings being part of multiple-team trade that also involved the Hornets where the Kings trade Kenny for Okafor, then add Nocioni and trade Nocioni and Okafor and get back an $18-20 million expiring contract from a third team.
So it would have to be a team that thinks it’s a couple of players away from a title or title contention that also has an expiring contract or contracts that equals the number above. I’m not sure anyone fits that bill, but I thought I would throw it into the mix.
If that were possible, we’d end up with an even bigger pile of cash to sit on or help the Maloofs weather the storm with without weakening our team much. Udoka, Omri and Greene would handle the SF duties, and though the last two would make a lot of mistakes, they would also add a lot of excitement that would be contagious. And they would certainly grow up more quickly.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 6:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree the "NBA economy"
is something we don’t know enough about. If its true team economics are as bad as it seems like they could be across the league, than this is a mistake, because we’re paying full price for merchandise that will be half off this summer or at this time next year.
In an environment where prices (player contracts) are getting cheaper, the most valuable thing you can have is cash. If we don’t do this trade, it could mean:
a) the Maloofs finances are not getting better or looking like they will
or
b) the NBA economy is worse off than the league wants to let on
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 6:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the future money isnt the concern here - the Maloofs are either ready to commit the money or not
the question is: is ths going to make the team significantly better for the money spent? If the only way you make a deal is searching the bargain bins, then yes, keep looking and good luck to you.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 7:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you don't make a good deal
if it costs you the chance to do a great deal you think its very likely you will have the opportunity to do.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that is a real big maybe
what is your other deal?
You decide to trade the #31 pick for Sergio and #38 – ooops! #37 has DeJuan Blair available… bad deal? it is the chance you took.
In the case, you take Okafor – the known quantity, solid starter or you pass, keep the cash, and cross your fingers that you will pick a superstar in the lottery.
I can take the Ouija board out again if you like….
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 7:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're making the assumption you know all the possiblities
you don’t, you don’t have enough information.
What I am saying is, if the Kings believe the economics have changed in the NBA, and the cash to pay players won’t be there this summer, it is foolish to take on an additional current market value contract.
The question is their opinion of the meta-environment of the league. None of us know that. This isn’t saving your money for the bargain bin, it is making a judgement whether or not the NBA world has changed.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am playing devil's advocate - partially arguing for arguement's sake. As for information, it is all that is available at the moment.
I think we agree on the premise; this is a gamble. The unaswerable question is – is it worth it?
and you know the answer- you rolls the dice and you takes your chances. Or you put your hands in your pockets and walk away and wait for the next deal which may or may not arrive.
I know you must play the market – do you buy KNG stock or wait to buy it later in the year? It may go up, it may come down, you might want to buy a different option. Buying or not buying are both decisions. I am for the option of buying what the Hornets are selling.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 8:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am not saying we shouldn't make the trade
extending the market analogy…stocks in November of last year looked pretty cheap. If you were reasonably sure the market was going to go down further, would you have bought then, or waited until March when they were cheaper, knowing you couldn’t get out of your investment for 5 years?
It could turn out buying in November was smart, it probably will work, but you could be missing out on a historically good opportunity that isn’t too far away. That’s all I’m saying we don’t know.
As for my personal opinion, if coolcat’s scenario isn’t on the table, and this is NBA business as usual, I would make the trade. I think its good value, and Okefor is worth the money. If the NBA owners are all hurting bad enough though, (the Maloofs should have a feel for this), then I’m passing and waiting for the Armegeddon scenario to play out with cash ready to spend.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 15, 2009 7:07 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
well said and we agree
If discussions have started then the Maloofs have considered spending the money – a big hurdle passed.
As for the NBA economy – not looking birght, but you bring up the relevant wording: has it hit bottom? Projected cap for next is forecast as $50M which means that the Kings are committed to be over the cap after dumping as much salary as possible earlier this year.
Other teams will be looking to firesale their assets at some point, because no one will want to be taxed. The Maloofs got NBA loan money last year – I am sure it came with some directives, like don’t be over the cap, but who knows? Maybe the NBA becomes a bit like MLB – you have the $50M (or $45M or $40M) teams and the LA Lakers and the NY Knicks with $100M salaries.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 7:20 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Also agree with this
Maybe the NBA becomes a bit like MLB – you have the $50M (or $45M or $40M) teams and the LA Lakers and the NY Knicks with $100M salaries.
And it’s pretty easy to see where the Kings fit in that scenario.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 15, 2009 8:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cash is king
If the NBA owners are all hurting bad enough though, (the Maloofs should have a feel for this), then I’m passing and waiting for the Armegeddon scenario to play out with cash ready to spend.
This explains my position well. Don’t overpay for Okafor, hoard the cash, buy players when they are on sale, be choosy on who you pay well and retain when current contracts expire.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 15, 2009 8:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if you don't spend the cash now then you spend the chance and you spend time
Not saying it is a bad investment – but it there is a cost to either doing or not doing this deal today v. tomorrow v. never
How long do you spend on the sidelines drumming your fingers waiting for the collapse of the NBA economy (aka “Armeggedon”) – for the better deal, the better player, and on and on…
which is why, btw, I am not an NBA GM (though my record as an NBA GM is unblemished, and I have never lost a game as a Coach either)
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 10:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Remember the old adage
Sometimes the best trades are the ones you don’t make.
We win four games and suddenly we have to make a deal? I don’t think so. Let’s play the hand we’re holding.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 15, 2009 10:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Blair's fast start is fading fast
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 15, 2009 12:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's what happens
when you go from being a second-unit energy guy to facing off against the big boys on fresh legs. He’ll adjust, but no one said he should have been a starter.
GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
by iashwash on Nov 15, 2009 6:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
perhaps - it was an example and off subject here but to continue on anyway:
Today only – would you trade Sergio and Brockman for Blair?
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 6:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, use him as a fourth rotation big and play him 15 minutes a night, and make sure he has a support staff for those knees (including a full time trainer).
GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
by iashwash on Nov 15, 2009 7:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You forgot the cash
GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
by iashwash on Nov 15, 2009 7:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes, interesting that it was an important part of the deal
and here we are – 600 posts into discussing a $60M commitment four months later.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 15, 2009 7:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just as a followup
Would it be possible to trade Okafor and Nocioni to Cleveland for Shaq?
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 6:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Only if Shaq brings his own shovel and a bag of lime
so we can bury his ass!
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 6:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Two other teams might qualify
Miami with Jermaine O’Neal and Washington with Mike Miller, Mike James and Brendan Haywood.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 7:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
where are you going with this coolcat?
you seem to be trying hard to clear the deck including Nocioni for free agency?
You don’t actually want Shaq or Jermaine O’Neal right?
(not being sarcastic, I am not sure what you are trying to accomplish)
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just trying to pile up more cash.
I don’t really want those guys to play much for us, maybe just replace Kenny’s minutes while giving us more $$$ in expiring contracts. Cash is going to be king.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 7:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Okafor & Nocioni would never satisfy Cleveland for Shaq
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 7:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
it should
but it wouldn’t.
Shaq is done, time to drive off into the sunset.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ok, I get your point. You have cash
do you keep it ?
do you spend it?
-if you spend it – what are you waiting for? another deal to arrive? (you may be waiting a while)
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You spend it
When a deal that makes financial sense is presented, particularly one in which your cash pile puts you at an advantage against a more leveraged and desperate team. Patience is a virtue in this game.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 15, 2009 8:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If Okafor is the real deal
it would strengthen their team and possibly get that title that LeBron is pining for.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 7:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Than why would the Kings trade Okafor?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 7:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because we don't want to pay him
but Cleveland will.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 7:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Than why make a deal for Okafor in the first place?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 7:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
why on earth would you trade for shaq's contract? the kings owuldnt be able to do ANYTHING with the cap space because no one that will be better than what we have will sign here. NO ONE
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
name one star player, in his prime, not at the end of his career trying to get a ring, that signed in a big market for less money than a small market was offering.
Players in their prime go where the money is.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but we arent going to offer anyone good more than they will get from the bigger market
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's crap too
It’s the same for everyone. The only way a player will get more than what he can get on the market elsewhere is from his own team.
LeBron can get much more money from Cleveland, Wade in Miami, Bosh in Toronto, and like that.
This is about money CBB. Players aren’t leaving anywhere for less money regardless of market.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And that money this summer will be in every major market
And a few smaller markets too.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 7:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hint
New Orleans isn’t the only team losing big money. The big paydays are going to dry up. Cash is king.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 8:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For what?
What is “Cash is King” mean in this context? What?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not my idea.....
I’m not sure about Okafor or not, but I definitely don’t think this summer is anything to write home about either.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 7:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Explained above.
Reread slooooowly. More cash. $20 million coming of fthe books instead of nine million. I’m not sure why this is so hard to comprehend.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 8:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not hard to comprehend
It’s hard to see what the advantage is for the Kings by doing so. You keep saying cash is king. For what?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
whats the point in cap space with no one willing to accept it?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
None
But I’m not arguing that point CBB.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah im on your side pookey. hahaha
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well on the 2010 FA is just a big brouhaha anyway
As far as Okafor, I’m not sure if I want to say yes or no to that right now. I have absolutely no clue as to whether that deal is something the Kings should do.
I know it won’t kill the Kings next summer though.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Now an argument that many more teams won't exceed the cap
than they used to, that I’ll buy.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Cap or the Luxury tax?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Both
I think few will go much over the cap
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you know the difference?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
no, I'm an idiot who has
been wasting is time here
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:19 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
arent the cap and luxury tax the same in the nba?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
OK
you can tell Trojan the diff
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
seriously. dont they not call it a salary cap, but a luxury tax threshold? because its not a cap like in the nfl
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Your response didn't indicate that you did
You said both. Both aren’t the same thing. I figured you knew the difference, but after reading that I wasn’t sure. Apparently you are.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not exactly 'high math'
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe someone here can post am article stating difference.. I am kinda new to all of this stuff (been a BBall fan for years, just never got that far into this info.)
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Its easy
Cap is 57 mil. you can’t go over it accept to re-sign your own guys (there are tricks, sign and trades ect but) If you go over 67 mil you pay a ‘tax’ dollar for dollar which goes to teams under the cap evenly
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The tax line is 69.92 mil
But lttg has everything else correct.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is what I was talking about with your FAQ post Pookey.
No law when it comes to me.
I let you type critics write and I just keep it hood.
That will never change.
I am not kissing no ones ass because I'm in LA. Suck a cock.
-Ron Artest (e-mail exchange with Kyle Slavin)
by jjham15 on Nov 14, 2009 9:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes JJ I know
I’ll have to re-tweak it obviously.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 10:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so they have both? ok. i thought they just had the luxury tax line. thanks.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes there is both
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So New Orl
who is at $73 mil is really paying $80 mil (more or less) because they pay the Tax dollar for dollar over the $67 mil
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They're about 4 million over the tax line lttg
Not 7 million.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Pookey is right
69 mil (thought it was $67) so New Orl is paying $77 mil more or less in a market the same size as ours with the same lack of Big corporate support
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
they have all the tourism and shipping though
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tourists don't buy tix
or lux suites or provide any other corp support
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i was just pointing out that it injects money into the economy
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, no doubt
service jobs don’t pay that much and New orl has the cheapest Tix in the NBA.
Anyway, they’re in bad shape financially, losing big money. They were OK with that if a Championship was looming but it clearly isn’t now.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah they are fucked. owners wanted to keep team in okc, but stern wouldnt let them
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Survival for one.
Again, I think the Kings are headed for a Moneyball scenario where they get players like Udoka, continue to focus on the draft and get real choosy about who they pay what to. But, hey, if you think money is still growing on trees in the NBA, this vision probably doesn’t make much sense to you.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 8:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not following your logic CC
You need to explain it in precise 10 step detail before I really go forth with what you’re saying. Don’t allude to a point and expect me to understand what your’e saying.
Don’t allude to moneyball and tell me that is how team’s are going to operate. Don’t mix baseball & basketball metaphor’s here and expect me to follow the line of logic.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
Apparently I am wasting my time.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you don't wish to explain your position
How can I understand it?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Your Moneyball logic makes no sense CC.
If Petrie was a Moneyball guy, he would have chosen Blair in the draft. The Moneyball idea is to choose players based on passed performances, regardless of league level instead of raw ability. Petrie would restrict his draft picks to players who were either Juniors or seniors because of personal and physical development so he could get players that enter their prime during their first contract. Players like Udoka fill a need but Beane would have instead surfed the NBDL for players who had a track record of success.
Jack Cust is a perfect example. Cust has 199 career minor league home runs- a proven hitter at a secondary level of play. Udoka is more of a major league utility infielder who never really put it all together- someone that Beane would avoid. Instead, he would have pulled up a Keith Ginter type who had previously hit 20 Hrs at the major league level in less than 400 ABs which showed not only potential but success.
I’m not saying that I signing Udoka was incorrect, I’m saying that your Moenyball comparison was off base. Signing SAR was a Beane esque move (not the length of the contract but the value for the talent)- past All-Star level talent on the down swing. Signing Moore, Salmons and Udrih were not- money spent on players who had never shown a propensity for success.
No law when it comes to me.
I let you type critics write and I just keep it hood.
That will never change.
I am not kissing no ones ass because I'm in LA. Suck a cock.
-Ron Artest (e-mail exchange with Kyle Slavin)
by jjham15 on Nov 14, 2009 9:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I kinda see Udoka as a guy Beane would pursue. kinda the equivalent of an adam kennedy type. Beane likes middling reclamation projects who get paid the minimum hoping to catch lightning in a bottle and flip them for younger talent as well.
I wanted to adopt, but all the good looking babies were taken
by joeytothelimit on Nov 14, 2009 11:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Kennedy is a career .277 hitter with over 5,000 plate appearances.
Kennedy has always been a good hitter, just not great. Bringing in Kennedy is closer to bringing in Giambi or Nomar. Sure those guys have had better careers but Kennedy was the starting 2nd baseman for the Angels for 7 seasons and another two for the Cards before signing a minor league deal with Tampa Bay.
Again, I like Udoka but he is a 9,10,11 guy at best. Kennedy is closer to bringing in a Derek Fischer or Shane Battier type roll player in the NBA.
No law when it comes to me.
I let you type critics write and I just keep it hood.
That will never change.
I am not kissing no ones ass because I'm in LA. Suck a cock.
-Ron Artest (e-mail exchange with Kyle Slavin)
by jjham15 on Nov 15, 2009 12:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn your spelling is horrid
I wanted to adopt, but all the good looking babies were taken
by joeytothelimit on Nov 14, 2009 11:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
that was a total misreply
I wanted to adopt, but all the good looking babies were taken
by joeytothelimit on Nov 14, 2009 11:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Petrie may not use the same selection criteria
But the intent is the same: field competitive teams while spending less money. Don’t overpay.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 15, 2009 8:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're working too hard at it then
Its very likely Nocioni will be tradable in a month or two for expirings or something close to it. Someone will do the “his contract declines in value” rationalization to themselves and take him from us if we want.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fine then, just let Kenny expire
But don’t add a big multi-year contract to replace him.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 7:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
a perfectly defensible position, one I am close to agreeing with, its a tough call.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it comes down to whether you think Okafor gets us a playoff spot this season
If he does, I think the Maloofs want to do if for financial reasons.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Thats a least a big factor in the calculation
Tickets sales, they’re bound to go up if the Kings keep winning
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the arean was at least 20% more filled between the last two home games
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They're selling 'walk-up' tix
which they didn’t do at all except for the Lakers last year.
Still pretty thin though
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 8:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah i bought a bumch of those walk up tix. paid 10 bucks and sat in the very front of the second deck. less than half full on tuesday and a little more than half on friday
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You don't get it
No giant Free agent has ever come here. Not likely to happen either
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 15, 2009 12:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wade for a last second 3 and the Nets are now 0-10
Wow.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 6:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Brandom Jennings
is going nuts, he’s got 39; the Warriors defense is a complete joke.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
So glad I have him in my PASPN league
not glad that he’s not a King
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Nov 14, 2009 10:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Trade
Martin, K9, and next years 1st rounder for Oak and CP3.
by blako on Nov 14, 2009 7:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Brandon Jennings is torching the nets
39 points in the 3rd quarter!!!!
29 points in one quarter!!!!
T-Rek has competition for ROY
by bench_blob on Nov 14, 2009 7:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Goddamn, 42 pts now.
Hate to admit it, but he’s the front runner. Reke is playing serious catch up.
There's nothing to fear but everything.
by elfboy_ on Nov 14, 2009 7:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
27 shots and 3 assists
It’s a good thing he’s a pure point guard, or else people might complain.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 7:24 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
would you rather have Brandon Jennings or Tyreke Evans on your team?
Tyreke plays defense. Jennings is quick and can get some steals. Depends on what you want. I think the Kings made the better choice. I am never wrong….
(well once I thought I was wrong but I wasn’t)
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 7:38 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I prefer Reke
If we had picked Jennings, I would likely answer him.
But trying to be objective. Jennings is really skinny. I like Tyreke’s size next to Kevin.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 7:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
think about what a different season this would be with Jennings
Kevin Martin and Brandon Jennings in your frontcourt. Very different. Not better or worse, just saying different.
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 7:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...you were wrong for thinking you were wrong. ;p
But I had the same thought. Tyreke plays both ends, and 3 positions. Jennings plays one end, and one position. Give me T-Rek any day.
I wonder how much of this is for Don Nelson passing on Jennings and taking Curry. That has to give him a little extra motivation for tonight.
Looks like the Warriors screwed up, and the Knicks screwed up worse.
Obviously it is early but only 5 rookies have averaged 20 PPG and 5 ASST:
Michael Jordan
LeBron James
Brandon Jennings
Someone else good (?)
Oscar Robertson
by bench_blob on Nov 14, 2009 7:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
evans does not play 3 positions. youre kidding right?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he can guard 3 positions - most of the time (Ariza last night)
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 7:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, and that worked out well for the kings...
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
check the scoreboard
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 8:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
im just saying that the kings made ariza look like an all star. it is like when a mediocre pitcher plays the giants...
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
challenging popular perception with the concrete.
Hopefully that changes though as he gets more experience – I think it cannot be denied he has the physical tools. It’s just a matter of knowledge, effort and execution.
by thelettere on Nov 15, 2009 6:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
challenging popular perception with the concrete.
Hopefully that changes though as he gets more experience – I think it cannot be denied he has the physical tools. It’s just a matter of knowledge, effort and execution.
by thelettere on Nov 15, 2009 6:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Rockets first two baskets last night
were Ariza threes over Tyreke. I think he had 18 in the first half and really didn’t cool off until Udoka covered him.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
tyreke has those long arms that sneak up on other guards. but the big small forwards arent going to be affected by him
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
wow, so if a guy has a great game the other guy sucks?
guess the whole League sucked against MJ, Bird, Magic, LeBron….
by betweentheeyes on Nov 14, 2009 8:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
dude tyreke is awesome. i love him. but he cant be counted on to guard small forwards. thats all i was saying.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
however you made my point... those guys you mentioned are HOF players... Ariza not so much
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rookie has to learn the league - the players
Thats all
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Nov 14, 2009 9:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd for the last line
I appreciate the subtlety.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Nov 14, 2009 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Only if they don't take defense into consideration.
Jenning’s can’t defend.
Once Reke gets comfortable with a pull-up jumper its not even a contest.
by nothingbutnet on Nov 14, 2009 7:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
James Harden
adminsters the huge facial to Manu Ginobelli, I love it.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:24 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush...
Frankly I’d rather have a bush in my hand, but that’s another issue for another day. I get where TZ is coming from. Let’s assume for a moment this rumor has legs. You’re taking a more or less sure thing in Okafor (career 14 & 10) as opposed to gambling on f.a. I’d do this deal in a heart beat. It gives us a killer starting 5 and may also put butts in the seats at the same time.
I’ve never been a huge Hawes fan and while he is young and serviceable at the 5, I think he takes way too many 3’s (how many has he hit this year?). He’s got a ways to go before he’s a top 10 five. With him coming off the bench he may be able to flourish a little. The best Kings team had a 3-big man rotation of Webber – Divac- Pollard. I close my eyes and see Thompson-Okafor-Hawes.
Purveyor of Bull Plop
by SayWhat? on Nov 14, 2009 7:25 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
yep, 12 shots in 9 games is 1.3 per game.
I have no problem with him taking 1 or 2 open 3s a game. He’s not hitting them now, but he shot .348 from 3 last season which is the same as shooting .522 from 2.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 7:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Quit talking out of your ass...
Jennings averaged like 4 PTS in the Euroleague. No one saw this coming. His play is predicated on amazing shooting. The league will adjust to him. It is unlikely he can keep up this incredible shooting pace.
by bench_blob on Nov 14, 2009 7:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if you saw him play in high school you saw this coming. the european game is completely different from the nba.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Word. I saw this coming. His high school games showed much 'swagger'.
He looked like a man playing with boys. His floor vision was very advanced in high school. I will say I didn’t expect him to shoot this well but I did know the man can play.
33 Wins. Yeah, I said it.
by JETisKing on Nov 14, 2009 8:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Trade Scenario- Good for all parties
OK so here is a trade situation for you Just seeing other posts here make some wonder- (Done through ESPN trader- 3 team trade between Warriors, Hornets and Kings
And yes i will take constructive criticism. i am new to all this and still getting my bearings
Kings get Biedrens and Jackson,
Hornets get Sergio and KT
Golden State gets noc and okafur..
this trade does work out money wise, Golden state gets rid of Jackson and gets Noc, hornets get their pay dump, we get a better center in Biedrens (on the PER) with less money for the next 4 years (actually it saves us 2.5 million this year) then with emeka
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 7:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Jackson is a cancer
We’ve got good chemistry guys now, and this bitch would ruin it.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 7:39 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Interesting, and you did your homework
but I think I’d rather puke on myself than have Stephen Jackson.
This current Kings team is all team oriented guys, why mess that up bringing in Stephen Jackson, who is also vastly overpaid.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 7:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
we dont want those guys. nellie never plays randolph. he like sbig guys that jack 3's... Hawes for randolph straight up
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Were winning right now due in a large part to team chemistry,
Jackson’s bloated perception of himslef would seriously turn the team in the wrong direction.
NO WAY.
by nothingbutnet on Nov 14, 2009 7:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus,
I like Noc and would feel terrible sending him to Hell.
by nothingbutnet on Nov 14, 2009 7:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks bro. :-)
There can only be one Noce!
by NoceOne on Nov 15, 2009 7:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Revised trade situation with no Jackson, now that I look at it:
Kings get Randolph(W), Biedrens(W) and Claxton(W)
Hornets get salary dump- K9(Woof) and Rodriguez(K)
Golden state gets Francisco and Okafor
We keep Noc, get a center and an extra PG(to replace Sergio) and no Jackson, Hornets still get Salary Dump, Nellie gets his big guy and a decent bench SG
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
don nelson doesnt want a player like okafor, he wants a player like hawes that jacks up threes... hawes for randolph!!!
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fine we will throw Nellie Hawes to and it still works in the trade..then he can just go trade Oka to someone else
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How much is Biedrins owed?
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 8:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he and okafor are the same player and eventually will have the same contract. why do you want one more than the other?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
Biedrins is 4 years younger.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 8:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
really? i guess okafor did have the college years
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Biedrins also came over from Latvia at 18 years old too
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
9 million a year for the next 5..hes locked..
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
a lot more than you want to spend
5 years $9mil per
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 8:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Biedrens cheaper in long run and better PER (19.2 vs 19.0)
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry 19.2 vs 18 (B vs Oka)
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Personally
I don’t mind Biedrins, but he doesn’t seem to be what coolcat wants.
I’d consider taking Biedrins for K9 too.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
by ForThree on Nov 14, 2009 8:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rather have Okafor
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 8:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would be happier with Biedrens for K9 then Oka
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
okafor.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Pookey for center…And we will throw in an I hate Kobe tshirt!
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm fat
Not tall or Long. (Well I’m kinda tall if 6’1 qualifies.)
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Nov 14, 2009 10:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you are going to take on salary and Biedrins
then work Morrow and/or Azubukie into the deal as well.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 8:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Biedrins seems injury prone
which is another reason I doubt the Maloofs pay someone big $$$. Been there, done that.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 8:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok re revised again-- Heres one that works according to calculator
Kings take on Claxton, Marrow, Azubuike and Okafor
Hornets- K9(Woof) and sergio
Warriors get Hawes and Francisco
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so we trade for more wings to take pt away from greene and evans?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
who said we had to play em, and only 1 year contracts for all but Okafur- Claxton takes Sergios place, Marrow takes Garcia’s place, Azubuike takes K9’s place (Not really but we got enough guys at forward) and Okafur well its Okafur
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sweet. if they are on 1 year contracts im down. but i still think hawes for randolph is more likely
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
um
has anyone heard rumors of Hawes for Randolph? or is this just a rumor of this particular board?
by MichaelMack on Nov 14, 2009 8:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
there is no rumor. people were talking about biedrins and i said id rather have randolph and that don nelson likes seven footers who jack up threes.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It would be a nice rumor..See now Trojan is a named source..Make it happen Petrie..See New post below as this one was just getting long!@
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Nov 14, 2009 8:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
vescey is in my speed dial...
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry for the confusion.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 8:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
From a PR standpoint
Let’s say we make this deal and keep Okafor. Now the team has to spin it for the casual fan they want to start showing up at Arco.
We’re not adding a household name here exactly and 14 and 10 aren’t exactly All-Star numbers, so it’s got to be about the guys we have and how great and exciting they are and now we are just strengthening the team for a serious playoff run yada yada yada.
Bottom line: that fan doesn’t care how much you are paying the guy, although that becomes part of the story about how committed the Maloofs are, but you better continuing winning with this lineup now because you’ve just mortgaged the future to try to get some butts in the seats. And winning with the kind of effort we are already showing is the only way you are going to accomplish that. And the economy is going to blunt even that effort.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Nov 14, 2009 7:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i dont think so
Jason Thompson is just beginning to blossom as Sacramento’s main go-to guy at the post. Inserting Emeka Okafor can disrupt JT’s rythm now, and that is the last thing the kings want to do considering Thompson’s current perfomance, IMO, Bring someone who will support and complement him, not someone who would compete with him for being the kings’s premiere post player.
by fatalerror on Nov 14, 2009 7:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
he wont disrupt anything. he doesnt command the ball, he plays solid d and cleans up. that is what the kings need to compliment jt
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
also he can play next to hawes and his away form the basket gam. i think they would make a great three man rotation
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
okafor is better than anyone that the kings could sign. so make the trade.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
48 for Jennings now
whew
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 7:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
and 50 now.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
knicks/warriors fail
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
53 and probably just sealed the win
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 7:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bucks rookie record
51 by Lew Alcindor was the old record
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 7:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
we were in the upper deck at arco during a dallas game chanting "brandon jennings" at the top of our lungs. maybe we can trade martin for him
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe not
Ws 3 and Bucks TO. Crazy game.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 7:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i think he and tyreke were by far the best players in the draft. would have been happy if the kings had either
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, I was on record, being okay with
Rubio, Evans, Jennings, Flynn and even Curry with the 4th pick.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 7:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
just like jennings said, rubio is all hype and im glad he isnt in sacramento
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Nov 14, 2009 7:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
55 points
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 8:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
amazing game
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Nov 14, 2009 8:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

