How do you solve a problem like Garcia?
I honestly have no idea how I know this reference. Moving on...
What are we going to do with Garcia when he's healthy?
I love Cisco, he plays all-out, but when I see Noc & Omri at the 3 (or Evans when he's in with Beno and Sergio), I see guys playing the position with more upside for the team as a whole. Noc is generally pretty consistent (save some shooting issues for a stretch lately) and Omri is a bigger offensive threat and better rebounder than Garcia. And once Martin gets back, we may see some sets with him at the wing with Sergio & Beno at guard. Oh, and let's not forget Mister Greene, who along with Omri is the future of the franchise at SF.
Nocioni is trade bait, as everyone knows, but given his shorter contract, which isn't prohibitively more than Cisco's, year-to-year, I just can't help but wonder what we'll do with the kid. He's going to have to play in order to generate any interest from other teams, but assuming he comes back in February or March (and that may be optimistic), we're looking at a couple of reasonable possibilities.
The Kings are out of playoff contention, and PW decides to showcase Garcia and Noc (if he's still here) as much as possible for the off-season. OR...
Sacramento is still playing well, displaying phenomenal on-court chemistry, rattling some cages playoff-wise, or at least spoiler-wise, PW doesn't feel like screwing with things, and Garcia ends up in a Mateen Cleaves-like hole.
Best case for Cisco sees Nocioni traded at the deadline, but even if that's the case, I think he's third string at the 3, and given how Beno is playing as a backup, he might be 4th string at shooting guard, depending on how Westphal is matching up. You think having a 6'5" point guard is a matchup problem, Greene spending some time at off-guard is a 6'10" migraine for other teams. And Donte' is probably going to to continue to get better, too.
Can we say the same thing about Cisco? Or has he reached his ceiling? He's an energy guy, but we have a squad full of them now. The last thing I want to do is crap on Garcia, but I really don't know how he fits in to this team's future, whether Nocioni stays or goes.
You talk now.
(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
95 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good question.
My first instinct is to say that Noc loses some minutes. He’s the only guy that isn’t in our long term plans. If Cisco shows he’s on form, then He’ll probably reduce all the guards’ minutes across the board. However, It’s imperative that he earns his minutes by outplaying the current rotation.
I’ve been wondering about Kevin Martin coming back too. I’m not suggesting we trade him or anything, but when everyone’s healthy, there’s going to be a hell of a log jam in the back court!
by Rickyflip on Dec 13, 2009 1:49 AM PST via mobile reply actions
2 things
Cisco isn’t going anywhere this season because he’s BYC. I think other teams would want to wait until the off-season before acquiring Cisco’s 3 years and 17 million or so. It will just be easier to get a deal done then.
I think the Kings will shop Cisco around this summer to see what they can get, and will do the same with Noc once Kevin Martin returns (I think teams already know Noc is available for the right price, but teams haven’t tried to make deals yet because the Dec 15th deadline for most Free Agents hasn’t even come yet).
Or, maybe the Kings don’t deal Cisco because the depth at the 2 & 3 positions is nice, and they just deal Noc for the time being. Or, maybe other teams don’t like Cisco at the price. I’m not sure how any Cisco deal will play out, but right now the Kings don’t have their back up against the wall salary wise on any player for a minimum of the next season. By the time Cisco’s salary will hurt (even a little), it will be the time when Tyreke Evans will come up for an extension. Also, Beno Udrih’s contract expires at the same Cisco has a team option for the last season on his current deal.
Right now I think people are jumping the gun because they see Cisco as a player they like, but aren’t sure what he can contribute to the Kings in the future. My question: Why would other teams see it differently?
My hope is that a team out there really feels that Noc is a worthwhile piece to have, and they don’t mind giving up a 2011 expiring contract to get him. (Perhaps this is where Jason Kapono could be a move the Sixers would be willing to make. The problem is that the Sixers have 65+ million committed in salary next season, and that would be an extra salary beyond 2011 the Sixers would have to commit to. I’m not sure they would be willing to do that at this point.)
I wonder how Cisco fits in, but I won’t wonder what will happen as I don’t really know. All I do know is that Cisco won’t be traded until the following summer at the earliest.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
The halls are alive with the sound of mucous
As a guidance counselor for exchange student Omri Casspi, Cisco has been a blessing. Omri has often commented on how much Cisco Garcia has provided (maybe that explains the occassional bone headed move by Omri that seems to surface every game – and is far outweighed by the good stuff – jes’ sayin’).
How valuable is a locker room presence on this particular Kings team?
I agree with PG nothing happens until Garcia shows that his is worth wanting and with the BYC mixed in, he is worth more than just straight contract dollars. Any move by the Kings, like your question, is premature.
A separate question arose: isn’t it interesting that PW does not showcase any one of the potential trade floatsam?
You bring up a great question I'll have to tackle here in the next few days
Showcasing a player. I think it’s overrated myself.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
Yep
Not sure how often that has really helped.
I think this whole deal is way premature. One thing to add to the mix – Paul Westphal has shown a pretty good touch as far as finding the right roles for his players. Unless there is some team knocking down the doors to get Noc/Garcia/Martin etc., I’d rather wait until the offseason and see what PW can do with a full crew.
Are we really worried that suddenly we’ve got too much talent on the roster? What a difference a year makes.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
I'm not worried about that really
I just think the Kings have been looking to deal Noc, and potentially Garcia come July, from the word GO.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
We only have 2 SGs and they are both in street clothes atm
It will be a good thing when they both return.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
THANK YOU!
Garcia will be Martin’s back up when the matchup demands a larger SG, instead of Beno or Evans (I know Evans is the ideal SG size, but he is at his best bullying around normal size PG’s).
Pointgerburus (I really Effed that one up, huh?) will remain intact, it will just mean that one of those guys will slightly suffer in minutes, except for when we play teams with smaller SG’s (Warriors, Clippers, OKC to a certain extent), then it will be WaBeno off-guard time.
1. Evans, Beno, Rodriguez.
2. Martin, Garcia, Beno, Evans, Donte.
3. Noc, Donte, Casspi, Garcia.
4. Thompson, Thomas, Brockman, Donte (against small teams), May.
5. Hawesome (You’re slowly earning the name back, Spencer), Thompson, Brockman (pretty much only against the Rockets), May.
There is tons of flexibility here, because Rodriguez (and maybe Spencer) is the only uni-positional player in the rotation.
"Thou must give props" - Ice_9ine
by tomroadrunner on Dec 13, 2009 7:31 AM PST up reply actions
There are times when Donte at the 2 is ok
but the Portand game isn’t one of them. I don’t see PW believing that having Donte defend Roy is a advantage for the Kings. Nor do I like Donte on Blake or Miller. But, most of all I want to see Donte back at his natural position. His future isn’t as a 2, and until he gets back to playing consistent minutes at SF/PF, his development can’t progress as it should.
But, the whole thinking of forcing oppenent to defend Tyreke with their PG, by making their SG defend Donte is sound. But, Martin & Cisco are the right players for that job not Donte. And, because of his versatility, sticking around even as a costly backup. Because of our strength at PG (never in a million years thought I’d write that), if either of Martin or Cisco gets moved next year, I think the first to go would be Martin. Not that I believe that will happen next year.
I see the Kings with Martin, Tyreke, Beno, Sergio, & Cisco at the guards next season. And, Hawes, JT, Donte, Omri, & Brockman on the front line. Add a #1 draft pick big and another vet 3/4 (maybe Noc) coming off the bench, and you have a pretty deep 12 lineup. Certainly their not all going to get extended minutes, but the price will still be right until the rookie contracts start ending.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
And, because of his versatility, I see Cisco sticking around
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
And yet
Donte’ will likely at least start at the 2 against Portland.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 4:16 PM PST up reply actions
Maybe, but for how long
after Roy blows by him the second time and causes a problem for the interior defense, he may end up riding the bench. We’ll see.
I think I’d rather see Donte helping out JT, defending Aldridge. I think he can to a better job defending away from the basket than Thomas can. And, Aldrigde takes jumpers on 64% of his shots.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
Oh I agree
Reke on Roy and Beno on Blake/Miller will probably be the longest rotation.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 6:20 PM PST up reply actions
Roy usually doesn't turn on the afterburners
until the fourth quarter, so I think it’s safe to start Donte on him. Or hell, put Donte on Blake :)
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Dec 13, 2009 11:17 PM PST up reply actions
Roy doesn't have that luxury anymore
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 11:26 PM PST up reply actions
Since Oden's injury Roy had take a bigger part in the offense.
Where he use to take about 15-18 shots a game, now he’s up to 23-25 per game. That’s 6 shots per quarter and he’s a 80% FT shooter. He could score upwards of 15pts in the first quarter if Donte can’t stay in front of him.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
You call it flexibility
I call it Rodriguez, Casspi, and maybe Donte never seeing the floor.
Someone’s gotta go.
Even if they wanted to (and they don't I think) they can't trade Cisco
He’s both BYC and will be out injured probably past the trade deadline.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 6:52 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, it definitely won't be Cisco
Before the season, I was most excited to see how he and Reke fit together. I still am.
Noce makes the most sense to be moved first. But Petrie’s surprised us before.
Beno
I think Beno will have a lot to say about Garcia’s playing time.
As in, if Beno continues to play this well, it’s hard to see Garcia breaking into the backcourt rotation. Westphal loves playing Beno-Evans and Beno-Rodriguez and even Beno-Rodriguez-Evans — Garcia can handle, but doesn’t give the same dimension.
Of course, Martin will be the first to mix up that rotation. I suspect Martin could knock Greene out of two-guard minutes completely (moving up to SF/PF) and might knock Sergio out of the rotation (except on bad Beno nights or Reke foul trouble nights). Beno will still get plenty of minutes once Martin returns, but it won’t be minutes alongside Sergio.
Garcia’s the one in competition with Beno for minutes, and that’s mostly with Evans on and Martin off (or Martin at three).
Professor Paul Westphal - a PhD in Playing Time, a Masters in Minutes
If anyone can handle how to incorporate more rotation time to more players – Coach Paul seems to be the man.
I still contend that this Kings team is talent poor – but not with Westphal at the helm. He seems to find the strengths of his players and plays to those strengths. It is a wonderful thing for the young guys; it builds confidence and allows them to improve on the skills they lack in game situations. It is December, Martin won’t return until mid January. Four more long weeks to ponder. Injuries to others, losses, wins – I would expect some new options to be a welcome “problem”.
Besides, we have seen Sergio/Beno/Evans on the floor together, why not Beno/Evans/Martin/Garcia at four spots? It’s only crazy if you are Don Nelson…
by betweentheeyes on Dec 13, 2009 12:38 PM PST up reply actions
There's going to be bad Beno nights?
damn
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 2:08 PM PST up reply actions
Depth is good; slicing and dicing minutes
The trick is keeping the personalities happy. Everyone wants to play. But guys also get hurt, so there’s no guarantees the guys we have playing now won’t get the injury bug at some point. Problem “solved.”
Our big men (JT 34, Spencer 28, Thomas 10, Brockman 8, May 4) play about 84 minutes a game, so that means we are playing small ball lineups with a SF playing PF for about 12 minutes a game. So that gives us about 156 minutes to dole out at the 1, 2, 3 and 3.5.
Martin was averaging 42 minutes a game when he went down. That should drop a bit, but you have to think he’s going to be close to the team leader in minutes. Currently that’s Tyreke at 36.
So here’s what you gave to cut down from:
Kmart 42
Tyreke 36
Beno 30
Nocioni 27
Omri 24
Donte 19
Sergio 15
Udoka 11
TOTAL 204 (156 available)
So first we have to figure out how to work Martin into the rotation and then worry about Cisco when the time comes. Hack away.
Obviously Udoka is already getting spot minutes, so he probably doesn’t play much when Kevin gets back. Kmart will probably play 30-36 minutes every night. Nocioni and Beno are going to see a little less PT.
If you sliced it up based on percentages of court time, everyone would have their PT cut about 24% and here’s what you’d see:
Kevin 32
Tyreke 27
Beno 23
Nocioni 21
Omri 18
Donte 14
Sergio 11
Udoka 8
TOTAL 154
But we know Tyreke and Martin are going to get more burn than that, probably at least 36 minutes a night each. So on paper lets cut Udoka out of the rotation and give those minutes to Tyreke and Kevin and take a minute away from Beno, Nocioni and Sergio, and here’s what you end up with:
Kevin 36
Tyreke 36
Beno 22
Nocioni 20
Omri 18
Donte 14
Sergio 10
TOTAL 156
Basically you are going to have Beno, Nocioni, Omri, Donte, Sergio and Udoka battling for about 84 minutes of PT each night.
Trading Nocioni for a big man who takes away minutes from Brockman, Thomas and May (and maybe Spencer) is certainly one solution. Take away Nocion’s 27 minutes a game and Udoka’s minutes and you have 36 minutes for Kevin without impacting the playing time for the rest of the guys.
Note: some of the minutes averages above are for the games the player has played in, and some reflect the players total minutes divided by the team’s 22 games.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Dec 13, 2009 8:03 AM PST reply actions
Thing is
By the time Martin and Garcia come back, you don’t know the health status of the rest of the team.
There’s really no reason to worry about it until the time comes – and by then, the problem may have solved itself.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
Yep
That’s why I mentioned the potential for injury in the first paragraph.
Martin should be back fairly quickly, though, so the players may be the same at that point.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Dec 13, 2009 2:49 PM PST up reply actions
Well
you do worry that a player’s trade value may plummet once he’s not playing much anymore.
So yeah, there’s always that.
I'm not so sure about that
I think the guys that have the potential to be moved (Garcia, Nocioni, Martin) are pretty much known quantities.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
I would like to see him play under Westphal
Everyone seems to be playing better this year so I’d like Garcia to get the chance too.
I, like most, appreciate Nocioni but believe he will be gone by the deadline. Cut out Udoka’s minutes along with the trade (hopefully we get a big in return) and we there should be some minutes to go around…. not as much as last year.
I’d expect Westphal to continue working the matchups where bench players minutes will vary every night. I do think Casspi and Greene have moved ahead of him in the pecking order.
A Good Problem
I am glad to see this post, I was wondering the same thing last night.. I think Martin brings you the most potential for a strong defender/rebounder.. I know I will get killed for this but his points come at an expense, no defense little movement. Dont get me wrong I think he is an excellent player.
The issue is what makes us better? A strong defender to help with the big rotation and losing 16+ million with Noc and Martin?
When I see evans I thing DWADE a darn good gaurd, not a pg or sg a GAURD. You have lots of flexabilty with Cisco, Beno, Speedy with Omri and DG also.. we need a big man and more defense..
Garcia isn't going anywhere because of his BYC,
But I think and hope that Andres gets moved, and I also wouldn’t be surprised if Beno, Sergio, Udoka, May, and of course K9 are used in any number of packages as well.
You can’t tell me that defensive coaches like Scott Skiles, Doc Rivers, and Larry Brown wouldn’t love K9 and/or Nocioni along with Udoka for their hustle. And their are plenty of teams that would be willing to use Sergio for the second half of the season (as fun as he is, I am sure Petrie will want to get something back for his expiring too.) And there is some team out their that has seen how solid Beno has been and how great his shooting can be that will take a chance (the Clippers and Warriors would be great fits for him, actually.)
There is going to be at least 1 trade this season, most likely K9 and Sergio’s expirings to get some picks in return at least. Some contender would look at Nocioni and Udoka as very useful to add toughness (think Mark Cuban.)
So I am not so worried about Cisco’s playing time. By February there will be time for him. In the meantime, some depth helps us not feel rushed to bring Martin and Garcia back.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Dec 13, 2009 9:12 AM PST via mobile reply actions
I thought about this as Garcia sat in on the TV broadcast
Peaches said: “Hurry back, Cisco,” and I thought, “Yeah, but…” There are only so many minutes to go around. Someboby’s going to have to sit. PW plays a long bench, and that’s a good thing, but it really can’t get any longer at the 1 through 3 positions.
The answer may lie with the unfortunate reality of injuries. Teams always talk about “when we get fully healthy” but most teams never do. Don’t shoot me; I’m just the messenger and I don’t wish it. I’ve seen enough critical injuries at critical times over the years. But it always seems to happen.
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Dec 13, 2009 10:09 AM PST reply actions
I thought Garcia looked chubby faced in that interview
I have a hunch that he is a long ways away from being in playing shape. So he may by default limit his own minutes on the court.
Being interviewed by Peaches
adds 10 pounds.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Dec 14, 2009 8:08 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
And 10 years
Maybe he should just retire. Problem solved.
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Dec 14, 2009 12:09 PM PST up reply actions
Barring a trade...
when K-Mart and Cisco return, and assuming full health, PW is going to have to do some juggling. And his coaching prowess will be put to the test more than any time so far this year.
The way I see it, there are 6 guys who, by default of skill level, have to get a lot of minutes as our most reliable, talented core group of players. In order, they are:
Tyreke
K-Mart
JT
Beno
Hawes
Omri
These are our Top 6 guys. Forget about position, these are the guys you want on the floor. They are the most reliable shooters, and overall performers.
Then we have ‘wildcard’ players who run hot-and-cold, and level of play can be less relied upon. In no particular order, these four guys are:
Noccioni
Cisco
Sergio
Donte
Their minutes will be granted by PW based on match-ups, shooting touch, from 5 to 20+ minutes, to potential DNP-CDs.
The beauty of the team as I see it is that players who you may presume on the surface as competing for the same minutes can actually play together because of their varied skills. For example,
Donte
Omri
Cisco
Noccioni
all can play the ‘3’ position. But in the right situation, all could be on the court at the same time. Cisco can play PG, Omri can play SG, Donte and Noccioni can swing between SF and PF. This gives PW a lot of flexibility to find the right mix of guys depending on match-ups and hot shooting hand on any given night.
Ultimately, we need a strong low post scorer (read: Chris Bosh) to balance out the roster and make us an upper echelon team. Until then, there is a lot of roster flexibility and complementary pieces.
I agree with your top 6
assuming the new Beno is here to stay. I also agree with your next 4, except that x # of minutes will be taken up by a required 3rd big in the rotation.
assuming Cisco it the Cisco of old (which I doubt this season, but for sake of argument ) I would say he is 7 because he was very consistent last year and our best cluch shooter. Donte is the most inconsistent so I would rate him 10. Sergio and Noc would flip flop based on needs of each game.
If the cards fall in such a way that Noc no longer gets 24 minutes, I would trade him .
Why is adding depth and more talent a problem?
I don’t get it. Why the hell would adding another player of Cisco’s abilities be a problem. I mean come on guys. I hear this every time we have somebody playing good or better than predicted. ‘Oh no, how will we survive with more than one talented SG or PG or SF.’
Adding more talent is NEVER a problem if the coach knows how to manage that talent and clearly PW has a grip on these issues.
You should all be grateful we have the talent we do and that there is not a lot of pressure on Cisco. Please remember that he was SERIOUSLY INJURED. It was to his shooting arm. That is a serious matter and we just don’t know what he can or cannot do with it.
SO, everybody just relax a bit, enjoy the ride, and hope for the best.
Its going to be a long while for Cisco
according to reports. I was suprised though to hear yesterday that he’s started easy shooting drills the last few days. I don’t know what that means if anything for his progress. Damage to your shooting, ball handling wrist can affect your whole game for a long time.
From earlier reports it seemed like the beginning of March was the ‘real’ schedule.
I’m not worried about it. On Kevin,
I’m frothing at the bit to see KM playing again with this squad.
We all know that one way or another, barring injuries that Noce will almost certainly finish the season with another team and as coolcat illustarted very well above, that will clear out enough minutes.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 12:14 PM PST up reply actions
Depth of talent is one thing
And while Garcia is obviously an NBA-level talent, does anyone believe that in 2-3 years, he’ll be a more valuable commodity than Omri, Greene, or even Noc?
I’m not opposed to stockpiling talent, if you’re the Lakers and can have Lamar Odom off the bench, bully for you. But Cisco ain’t Lamar Odom, and I’m not even sure he’s Omri Casspi when he’s healthy.
I know Garcia won’t be the kind to make things ugly if he’s not playing, but I’d like to see him have his chance. Even when healthy, I don’t see him being more valuable than the the trio in the rotation at SF now, and the same goes for SG. I hated to lose Gerald Wallace, but I was happy to see him be able to blossom. I don’t think Garcia has GW’s type of talent, and I don’t see him outplaying what’s here now, even if Nocioni is eventually moved.
The depth that you’re adding is, I’m afraid, 3rd string depth, and I’d prefer to see Casspi and Greene work out the kinks in their game, rather than give Garcia minutes which might get him back to his ceiling, which I am afraid is 3rd string shooting guard.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen.
by andy sims on Dec 13, 2009 2:56 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Harsh
But, in my opinion, dead on. But he’s probably be better than 3rd string in a lot of other places and might even start or at least play major minutes for some of the worst teams. In other words, kind of like last year.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Dec 13, 2009 11:21 PM PST up reply actions
Garcia
In the right circumstance, he could be a very solid 6th man, maybe even B-Jax-esque. But on a young team that needs players with more upside than he has to get playing time, it’s just a bad fit here in river city.
Yup.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen.
I agree with what Mustang said above
but at the same time understand that there will be a point where minutes and salaries will be a problem with this team. It may be a good idea to strike the iron while its hot.
I think one way or another, Noce is going to have to be shipped. There’s just too much of the same with these players and the emergence of Omri, Donte, and WaBeno just makes it tough to keep all of them. I think trading Noce, probably for just expirings, will help clear some minutes for the returning guys and also for the ones that have been showing they are ready for some more minutes.
I think the versatility of this team will cover for the loss of Noce. Donte can play the 2,3, and 4, same for Omri (4 with really small lineups), Reke plays the 3 with the 3 guad lineup, and also Kevin should be back to play some 3 with the Sergio Beno/Reke lineup.
Yes, having lots of talent is always good but if we have other players that replicate the same skills, then other things such as minutes and salaries should also be considered. I think trading Noce is a bit of a solution to some of the (good) problems the team may see in the future.
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
We really have no salary problems at all
Even with draft cap hold we’ll be barely over the NBA minimum salary assuming no changes.
Not that disagree with getting something for Noce – but I don’t know why you’d bother with expirings, you’d actually be required to spend a lot of the the $$ on someone else.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 2:25 PM PST up reply actions
Well
I don’t think you could get more than expirins for Noce to be honest, at least not by himself. I’d love if that wasn’t the case and we could get a pick or a cheap back up big man, but I don’t see how that happens.
And in terms of the $$, I just think it;s always good to have flexibility for future trades and when some it’s time to extend some of our young guys (though I know we could go over the cap because we have their rights).
I guess I just think that if players we already have can cover for the loss of Noce, let’s just get whatever we can now because whatever it is (expirings, picks, or player) will most likely be something positive.
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
Funny, but if one were to ship out a contract because the player is "hot"
no one mentions Beno anymore.
by betweentheeyes on Dec 13, 2009 2:44 PM PST up reply actions
WaBeno is our new star, didn't you hear? haha
Personally, I don’t see Beno as trade bait right now because the set of skills he brings is unique compared to the other options we have available. Once Kevin and Cisco come back then I think we can have that discussion.
For now, I only see Noce as a guy who can be shipped out and the performance by the team wouldn’t change that much, if at all.
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
If your talking about getting nothing back in return, yes
but you have to trade either talent or money to get anything of value back. Beno has talent and is of value now. Maybe more value to other teams than to the KIngs. So, if we can fill a need by trading Beno, even before Martin’s return, I’m willing to live with a few more loses between now & then.
With Martin out, Beno brings his clutch shooting, but when Martin returns the most minutes Beno can expect is backing up Tyreke & Martin who are going to get 36+ minutes a game. But, those minutes could easily be picked up by Sergio & Cisco. And, I’m not sure that Sergio handing out assists & Cisco putting up 3’s isn’t a better overall benefit to the Kings than what Beno brings.
I think it comes down to keeping Martin & moving Beno, or keeping Beno & moving Martin. Unless we become the luckiest team in NBA Lottery History, we’re not getting a franchise Big in next years lottery. So, we’re going to have to move someone for a young center/PF prospect, lottery pick, or cap space that allows us to get a quality FA big. It may not happen at the trade deadline or even next summer, but it will happen. And, if the opportunity comes up before Martin’s return, we grab it.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
You don't move Beno
unless you lock up Sergio or get a young PG back. If Sergio suddenly signs an extension, look for something there.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 4:06 PM PST up reply actions
The QO locks Sergio in for another year
he’s not going to not play & not get paid. The worst that happens is he plays for a year and becomes an UFA. But, if his play continue to impress, GP will make him a contract offer. And, the offer will be less than Beno’s MLE.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
He must accept the QO?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 6:10 PM PST up reply actions
Thats not locked in then
Trade Beno, lose Sergio = trouble. Competant PGs are hard to find.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 7:16 PM PST up reply actions
or accept an offer sheet with another team, yes I know.
But, unless Sergio is willing to not play for the entire year and receive no salary, he’s going to have to accept the QO or sign an offer sheet from another team.
If he sits out the year and doesn’t play basketball, yes we wouldn’t have a backup, having already traded Beno. But really, what are the odds of that happening. The more likely senario is that he doesn’t accept the QO, and gets a offer sheet that the Kings won’t match.
But, your correct the safest move would to extend Sergio before trading Beno. Unfortunately, rookie contract extentions must be signed before Oct 31. So, the Kings can’t resign Sergio until the FA signing period next summer. And, if a offer that you can’t refuse, is received by the Kings for Beno, I’m guessing that they’ll that their chances with Sergio.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
I am assuming
Sergio would go play in Europe if the money was right.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Dec 13, 2009 11:24 PM PST up reply actions
I agree about the value of Beno to this team HT
And that’s why I talk about skill that can be replaced so much. Yes, a Noce trade would probably net us just expirings (at least that’s my opinion) and I’m fine with that. When it comes to Beno it gets a bit more tricky.
In my head, we would like to wait until Martin and, especially, Cisco come back before we move Beno (unless it’s a no brainer) because we truly don’t know if this injury will have an effect on Cisco’s shooting for the future. I’m just trying to cover all bases here. I think Beno is a good backup G but I also see the combo of Sergio and Cisco covering his production. This could also mean that we would resign Sergio next year for much cheaper than what Beno is owed.
I think it’s tough to see what’s going to happen in the next coming months, especially with a Kevin and Cisco out, but I’ve been thinking for a while that at least one from Noce, Beno, or Cisco needs to go. Depending on the return of Cisco and the continue emergence of our young players, moving 2 of those 3 for some tangible pieces (a defensive big man for example) sounds like a fair plan.
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
I can't argue with you logic
but even tho there’s the outside chance that Cisco doesn’t recover. The chance that we don’t get a quality big in the draft is even greater. So, if the opportunity to move Beno presents itself before Cisco returns to full health, I’ve got to take it. But, a young prospect big or lottery pick would have to be involved. Or, some expiring in a deal that included Beno & Noc.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
And do what with the money?
Now we’re down to $30 mil, which you can’t be, its the old Donald Sterling rule.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 6:17 PM PST up reply actions
For one thing -
You set yourself up to acquire talent for a future 2nd round pick from a team desperate to shed luxury tax dollars (as the Clippers did when they obtained Camby from the Nuggets). And with the cap coming down, there will be those opportunities. There will also be a limited number of teams under the cap next year, so you could pick up some decent talent there as well.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Aren't they decent talent?
and more MLEs, greeeat. Not GPs strong suit.
I’m not saying we shouldn’t move Noce, but both? And get who and for how much? We must be at $43 million salary minimum.
So unless its for a Star caliber guy I’d rather have my $$ in PGs.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 6:50 PM PST up reply actions
Hmmm -
Do you think we may need to re-think the MLE argument? If Beno is fair to good value, then that was a good signing, right? And Salmons was fair value. Moore was just a two year signing with a $2 million buyout. That leaves ’Reef and his knees as the worst signing of the bunch.
OK, some quick math. The Kings would be at about $29 million going into next season in they managed to trade Noc and Beno for expiring. Their draft pick would get them up to $31-32 million. If they re-signed Sergio (and they have matching rights), that would get them up to $34-$37 million, and your roster looks like this:
Hawes, JT, Brockman, Casspi, Garcia, Greene, Martin, Evans, Rodriguez, 1st round pick and maybe 2nd round pick. That’s 10-11 guys. Even if you don’t land a big fish, you could go out and add Tyrus Thomas or Udonis Haslem or Tyson Chandler (if he takes his ETO), not to mention the teams that will have to unload talent that will cost them twice as much due to the luxury tax (and there could be a lot of those teams).
I have a lot of confidence in Petrie and the staff that they could do the right thing with substantial cap space. They sure came through the last time around. The idea of holding onto players because we’re afraid of how we might turn around and spend the money seems like a baseless fear considering whose calling the shots here, but maybe I think too highly of Petrie.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
In Geoff We Trust
Is officially my position on all these matters. From last year’s wreckage pile to this year’s treasure trove. Talk about an amazing turnaround: Westphal v. Nattheus, Reke v. Will Solomon, Casspi v. McCants, Beno v. Beno. Miller/Moore v. neither. Petrie’s last truly bad move was hiring Reggie “Ain’t My Fault” Theus, and that might not have even been his decision.
All Hail Geoff.
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Dec 13, 2009 9:55 PM PST up reply actions
I still don’t think they gave Theus enough of a chance. That just my opinion. Brand new coach with a lot of young players. Yes you can say look at what westphals done but how long has he been coaching. I doubt we end up less wins with Theus then we did with Natt.
Judgment day is coming!
I never said less (or fewer) wins with Theus than with Natt
But that is setting a very low standard. If Westphal is a players coach, then Reggie was a Reggie coach, if you catch my drift.
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Dec 13, 2009 10:54 PM PST up reply actions
Just saying who knows what theus would have done if he had more time with teh guys..I just dont agree with firing him 20 games into the season.
Judgment day is coming!
I don't either but -
1. His staff sucked
2. He didn’t utilize what he did have staff-wise
3. His strategy sucked
4. He couldn’t get his strategy implemented by mis-using the players we did have
5. He never took any responsibility
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 11:45 PM PST up reply actions
And
He was (is) an egotist who’s more in love with the camera and the microphone than he was concerned with his team. Sort of like when he was a player (i.e., this was totally predictable). That had to get really old. He’s just the wrong coach to have around during a rebuild.
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Dec 14, 2009 12:16 PM PST up reply actions
I thought THAT was a given :)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 14, 2009 12:26 PM PST up reply actions
I do trust GP
I trust he agrees with me :)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 11:28 PM PST up reply actions
Ed - you can't have a payroll of less than $43 mil
you’d have to spend the money on someone. That NY problem if they fail to land one of the big guys – they’ll have to spend $$ on crap players just to meet the minimums.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 4:08 PM PST up reply actions
Got it (though I knew about the minimum)
Didn’t know we would be that much under. At the same time, there’s probably other moves that may be made, K-9 for example, that may change where we are in terms of $$. I understand what you’re saying though.
I guess I’m down with trading Noce for expirings as long as other moves are made and we don’t have to worry about just having over the payroll minimum.
Godfather of the "nice ass" movement.... the future begins now...
No team will likely be at the minimum salary.
It’s very hard to be that far under unless you don’t want to sign anybody.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Oh, hes in the laegue two and Jayson Thomson and that Boggins dude on Milwokee, and Occur for the Jizz. Its a talented laegue.--Kfan in Korea
I'm of the opinion that it all boils down to flexibility
Things we know:
1) The team has salary flexibility for next year, ceterius pleribus
2) The team has players that are flexible into different positions, ceterius pleribus
3) The team is only interested in being better as things present themselves
With the above mentioned in mind, I see a cautious approach by the organization to keep the first two points the same while making the third the motivation for doing so. I see the third point dominating the other two.
If an opportunity to get Bosh, Boozer or whomever presents itself this year before the deadline and it makes the team better by not giving up too much, even though the other two points might be effected, I think they do it. However, if a deal is at the expense of objectively looking at how our number 1 and 2 options play together (Martin and Reke), does it really make sense?
Could getting rid of Noc really hurt the team? I don’t think so. It might provide opportunity to get more flexibility in the big man area while giving up some in the small man area. Does this mean we are losing out? Again, I don’t think so. A team can only play 5 at a time. A neglegible subracting of flexibility coming by the loss of Noc in a trade, while providing a greater addition of flexibility at the big man spot seems to be addition by subraction and therefore a good deal, ceterius pleribus.
What about Garcia? Well, he won’t be traded until atleast this summer because of BYC. I am not concerend about who will lose minutes because of his return. I think PW has made it clear by his rotation. He will play the players who play hard and make smart choices during the game. If anything his return will give us more flexibility. And more flexibility is a good thing, in my opinion.
"Even a fool is counted wise when he holds his peace; When he shuts his lips, he is considered perceptive." Proverbs 17:28
Love this thread
It’s a good question, and also it’s the main reason other then my self interest that I offered the Peja for Noc and Garcia move.
As manyof you have already stated., there isn’t much room for Garcia or Noc on this team as they continue to develop. Trading both of them for a large expring asset, and combinging that expring with pick and cap space provides you with the ability to get a superstar.
Keep Evans and Martin as your guards and get a great center, or power forward with a back to the basket game to compliment J.T. and Hawes’ high post game. Trade Martin for a big, move Evans to the 2, and trade for a great point who can shoot the three.
The possibilities are truly endless.
I have to say guys I am quite envious of the current talent level/ cap flexibility that you guys have right now. I still love CP3 and the Hornets, but it would be nice if our hole was a bit more shallow.
My opinion
Peja is the last guy I want to see in a Kings uniform. Unless you want to count Brad Miller or Mike Bibby.
Also, Peja: $14.2M this season; $15.3M next. Why? To rid youself of Noc and Cisco? Two quality players who bring leadership, grit, and hustle?
One word: No.
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Dec 13, 2009 8:16 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
My point..
Is less about the value of my trade proposal then it is about the value of the question.
But since you mention it…you’ve got 2 quality players without a real stake in the future of the org. The value in this trade isn’t Peja, it’s what you get for Peja. Don’t get me wrong Pejacan still hoop somewhat but he isn’t a better player then Noc or Garcia. But he is a huge expring contract next year, that you guys can use for a sign and trade, or an expiring contract that allows you to hunt free agents in 2011. That is his value, plain and simple.
Right now there alot of teams who are willing to cut really good players if given the multiple picks and the expiring contract to do so or if you’re willing to take on bad contracts. Here a few in my opinion: Luol Deng, Andre Igoudola, Chris Kaman, Camby, Devin Harris, David Lee, Gortat, and those are just off of the top of my head. Some of those guys expire this year, but the same type of players will be available next year. Also to clarify why this doesn’t make me a hypocrite for balking at Okafor trades, a combo of K9 and two first round picks is a much better deal then K9 by homself.
But to get back to the point of this thread, you have two good players with long term contracts and it will be very hard for the Kings to take advantage of their value as players unless they trade them.
Yeah, but...
The Hornets end up with two good players and the Kings get an overpaid stiff who has a perimeter shot and nothing else. I understand that there are financial considerations, but I don’t see them as remotely justifying this deal. No thanks.
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Dec 13, 2009 9:12 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah - still NO
The Kings have moved on from the past and I still think that is the most important point.
It would go over like a sack of rocks to the fanbase who are just now falling in love with the young guys.
A veteran addition? Maybe. A ghost of the glory which just barely slipped from our fingers? NO.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 11:25 PM PST up reply actions
the cut bait strategy doesn't apply to the current squad
There is too much season left to make a deal on a team that is overachieving.
If it is mid-February and the Kings are 15-30 then expiring contracts will perk many ears – if the Kings are 20-25 and raising eyebrows, I don’t see it.
by betweentheeyes on Dec 13, 2009 11:36 PM PST up reply actions
Peja, No
But if you want to send that David West guy over here for Nocioni, I’m all ears. Yeah, I didn’t think so.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Dec 13, 2009 11:34 PM PST up reply actions
+ 1
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Dec 13, 2009 11:42 PM PST up reply actions
In conclusion (mine anyway)
I think its way too early to worry about how a guy that won’t be ready to play for another two months will fit in.
Everyone has my regal permission [:)] to start on the KM issue again as of, say, Friday or so, when he’s two weeks away.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
We need Cisco on this team
until someone else shows that they can consistently hit a clutch shot (or even consistently wants to take a clutch shot, for that matter). Though Cisco’s skills are largely covered by various other players on the team at this point, his fearlessness in the clutch is an “X-factor” that this team is otherwise utterly lacking. That may not be the difference between Playoffs and early vacation this year, but it may very well be the difference in the next couple of years.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Dec 15, 2009 12:03 PM PST reply actions
Damn my short memory
But hasn’t Cisco have about the same amount of clutch shots as he does nearly-clutch shots but his foot was either out of bounds or on the 3-point line?
I do not mean to impugn Cisco, but I’m just not sure he gets the crunch-time label. I’m not sure anyone on this team has earned one, although it sure feels like Evans may be the man to get things done when they need to be.
Being clutch on a 17-65 team ain’t exactly running into a burning building to save orphans.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen.
by andy sims on Dec 15, 2009 3:13 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I'll spare us all my anecdotal evidence
but Cisco has certainly earned that label with me. I’m sure not everyone agrees with me. Perhaps it’s just been too long since you’ve had a taste of the Dominican Dynamo, and he’ll win your heart back quickly when he returns.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Dec 15, 2009 3:28 PM PST up reply actions
Cisco's earned my affection already
He plays hard, he’s a great teammate, and so on.
But are the minutes he will take from Omri and Donte going to bring the long-term payoff (and we’re still in “it’s-all-long-term” mode) that playing younger guys with more upside?
That’s really all this post was about. I hate to make the comparison, but remember how sour we all were last year when Mikki Moore was playing instead of Thompson? Well, when Cisco gets back, with log jams at SF, PG & SG, I’m going to be be wondering why he’s in for more than very short stints when we have more talented guys at both spots.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen.
The difference is
Cisco could very well be an important part of the team when we are relevant again. I honestly am not with any of your premise. In my opinion Cisco makes a lot more sense on this team than Nociont. Noc has to go, then the 3 spot is wide open for Omri or Donte if they seize the job. If they don’t Cisco will do a competant job while we wait. If we’re extremely fortunate and Omri and Donte are both significantly better than Cisco, then we cross that bridge at that point.
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
You kind of made my point
Nocioni will be traded at some point, of course, but
then the 3 spot is wide open for Omri or Donte if they seize the job.
Cisco is a lot farther along in his development, and whether Casspi & Greene look all-world or not, with regular minutes, both of them will be better than Cisco can be in 12-24 months. I just don’t see any way Garcia is part of any long-term plans for this team, unless Greene, Casspi, Beno, Sergio or Martin are part of some deal with, or separate from, any Nocioni trade.
Nocioni is the first one off the bus, but that doesn’t really help Garcia, unless some others eventually leave, too. And even in those circumstances, unless it’s all done to get a high-quality big, we could still get players in return who have a superior skill set to Cisco’s.
I wish him nothing but the best, no matter where he plays. I just think he’s an average NBA talent who will be taking minutes from players who could be exceptional.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen.
I fundamentally disagree
that its anything close to a sure thing that both Omri and Donte will be better than Cisco in two years.
In fact, I think its the least likely scenario of the 3 (both will be better, one will be better, neither will be better).
Professional Hyperbole Slayer
don't trade Cisco
You can never have too many guys who can play the 1, 2 and 3. Who doesn’t mind playing defense and can hit 3’s….Besides i kinda see PW cutting down to kspeeds minutes because he is soo injury prone. I mean if the right deal comes around (which must include a big man), i wouldn’t trade him. Besides having Cisco, just makes the other team prepare for another shooting on the floor.

by 




















