Sactown Royalty: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Top Pick Odds: What Are the Chances Sacramento Lands Blake Griffin or Ricky Rubio?

Since Woj's latest rumor mentions The Draft Pick, let's look at our odds here.

Assume the team trades for cap space instead of talent.

As OKC and LAC continue to improve, it seems likely that Sacramento would finish with the worst record or the second worst record. (Hello, D.C.!)

If the Kings finish with the worst record, the team would have a 46.5% chance of winning the #1 pick or the #2 pick.

If the Kings finish with the second worst record, the team would have a 38.7% chance of winning the #1 pick or the #2 pick.

Let's average these since it seems a toss-up as to whether Washington or Sacramento will be worse. That would indicate a 42.6% probability of the Kings earning a top-2 pick.

This has been said to be a bad draft, with one "sure thing" (Blake Griffin), one mystical/mythical enigma (Ricky Rubio), and a bunch of solid if somewhat frightful prospects (James Harden [too small?], Stephen Curry [too gunnerific?], Greg Monroe [too soft?], Hasheem Thabeet [too raw?], Jordan Hill [too slight?], Jrue Holiday [too shot-averse?], Brandon Jennings [too shot-impotent?]). Let's just say there's a massive drop-off in confidence between No. 2 and No. 3, assuming Rubio enters the draft. You want a top-2 pick.

What are the odds Rubio enters the draft? Some sources say he will if he's a guaranteed top-3 pick. (He seems to be a guaranteed top-3 pick.) Others say he'll wait until 2010 no matter what. I have tended to believe the former, but that's possibly a function of wishful thinking. Let's place it at 60-40, in slight favor of Rubio coming out. Rubio may or may not enter the draft this summer, but it seems somewhat more likely that he would.

So we have a 42.6% probability at best of the Kings earning a top-2 pick. Within that, there's a 22.45% probability of the Kings winning the No. 1 pick. If that happens, Rubio doesn't matter -- if he comes out, you can debate Griffin vs. Rubio; if he doesn't, you get Griffin and are happy. We also then have the 20.15% probability of the Kings winning the #2 pick. Rubio matters here. If Rubio enters, you are still guaranteed one of your two fellows. If not, you are -- in all likelihood -- debating Harden, Monroe, Thabeet, Curry, Hill, Holiday and Jennings. Again, that's a big drop-off.

So using our made-up 60% probability that Rubio enters the draft, we can figure (in made-up numbers) the probability the Kings win No. 2 but Rubio stays out of the draft: 8.06%. The parallel chance the Kings win No. 2 and Rubio enters the draft: 12.09%.

Under our assumptions, there is a 22.45% probability of the Kings winning No. 1 overall and a 12.09% probability of the Kings winning No. 2 with Rubio or Griffin on the board. We combine these to find a 34.54% probability of the Kings winning Griffin or Rubio, should our assumptions hold.

Let's lay this out in chart form. (The 'x' in 'Rubio x%' indicates the probability Rubio enters the draft. Choose the one you feel most comfortable with.)

Chance Rubio Enters? Chance of Getting Griffin/Rubio
RUBIO 100% 42.6%
RUBIO 75% 37.56%
RUBIO 50% 32.5%
RUBIO 25% 27.49%
RUBIO 0% 22.45%

Best case scenario, which is Rubio definitely coming out: the Kings have a 42.6% chance of getting Griffin or Rubio. Worst case scenario, which Rubio staying out of the draft: the Kings have a 22.45% chance of getting Griffin.

***

Everyone has different views on Amare, on Griffin, on Rubio, on Thabeet, on Shock & Hawes. At this point, most of us know each other's positions. But it's worth taking a step back to really consider the odds of our wildest dreams coming true. Maybe it's cold and anti-emotional. But it's pragmatic.

In the best case scenario -- Rubio entering the draft, the Timberwolves not falling below the Kings in the standings, the Kings continuing to be offensive on the court -- there is a less-than-50% chance of pulling one of the top two draft targets. Think about it. My asset list is certainly shifting because of this.

 

Poll
Would you trade The Draft Pick (the Kings' 2009 first rounder) and expiring contracts for Amare?
Yes
154 votes
No
168 votes

322 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 95 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

That chart is really good

I ended up voting yes, since you said Draft Pick and expiring for Amare. But I would not do the trade if we lose the Draft pick and either Shock and Hawes in that equation. That seems too much.

Still, Stoudemire gives this team a proven all-star, a young big that we could make our franchise guy. Martin won’t be the focus of the defense anymore and Stoudemire will most likely demand a double team, leading to more open opportunities for Martin and Garcia.

If Amare came to Sacramento, I might whine about who we lost or what we gave up for him, but that doesn’t mean our team doesn’t get better immediately.

by Aykis16 on Feb 14, 2009 7:45 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

No wayyy (* [hick!] *)

Almost anything buh thu #1 …..

whah were takin about?
(fugk the fugking lakeers….)

So imitate the action of the tiger!
Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood,
Disguise fair nature with hard-favoured rage.
- lend the eye a terrible aspect,

Now set the teeth - and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Feb 14, 2009 5:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My view on it

I want Rubio in a Kings uniform. Griffin? Would be nice, but I think JT will be very good, so to me, that cancels out Griffin.

If they can’t get Rubio, then I say go for Amare. I think Amare would be a great compliment to Martin. Nice 1-2 punch on offense. Defense? Eek.

by shadow1480 on Feb 14, 2009 7:46 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Everyone complains about how bringing in Amare is horrible for defense

but we’re probably the worst defensive team in the league right now anyway. Amare isn’t going to fix that. A new coach, mindset, and probably other acquisitions does that.

Amare brings us a proven player. He’s already a 4 time All Star at 26 (I’m not pulling that out of my ass am I? I swear I read that somewhere).

Still I hear you. We need to get better on defense. But just keep in mind one player won’t bring us defensive credibility.

Honestly though, I think the Kings should hire Doug Christie as an Assistant Coach.

by Aykis16 on Feb 14, 2009 7:51 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Honestly, I really don’t care that Amare’s D sucks. Like you said, he’s proven. I wouldn’t mind adding 20 and 10 to this team.

by shadow1480 on Feb 14, 2009 7:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Could you imagine

How much foul trouble we’d get teams in with Amare and JT on the block and Martin slashing?

by Aykis16 on Feb 14, 2009 8:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

A 100% chance at Amare is greater than the best case odds at landing whatever rookie you prefer. And under this setup, your front line is now Amare/JT/Hawes, and they can play in any combination. Nice.

As I have said before, I completely respect the opinion of those that do not want Stoudemire coming here. I just happen to think that he’s worth the risk.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Feb 14, 2009 8:14 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Amare is better than Griffin

is going to be. At least that’s my take at the present time. The real question is with Rubio, who because of his position could be more of a game-changer than either. But with the odds of getting him and him actually deciding to come over up in the air, Stoudemire is more of a sure thing.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 14, 2009 8:19 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Hell yeh! Amd I'm not that big of an Amare fan.

The poll question says the #1 plus expiring…I would do that immediately. However, I am sure that it can only be done if we unload the Miller Thomas contracts (Marbury?), otherwise the Kings would be way into luxury tax for 09/10 season. But , to unload a #1, expiring (Jackson William Douby) and Miller and Thomas for Amare…Hell yeh! I’d see that and raise a Salmons if I had to (then I’d find a running game point guard).

by ElRonToro on Feb 14, 2009 8:34 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Would you go for the deal

I proposed in another thread:

Kings get Stoudemire and Robin Lopez..

Suns get JT, Salmons, BJax, Sheldon and next year’s No. 1.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 14, 2009 8:50 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Yes

JT is going to be good. As good as Amare is right now? Probably not. And getting Amare now we probably won’t have too high of a lottery pick next year although it will still in all likelihood be a lottery pick. And we also get this pick. I don’t think the Suns do it though.

by Aykis16 on Feb 14, 2009 8:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Amare is better than Griffin and/or Rubio

But that’s not the whole equation. Amare also is up for a contract renewal in which he could walk away, and he’s a microfracture survivor. I think when you factor all that in, the security of having a top pick and a (hopfully) really good player for four years at $4-5 million is greater and more valuable than Amare given the uncertainty of his knees and contract (not to mention motivation).

So I say no.

Also think Teague has to be in this discussion — anyone who still thinks Holiday is a top pick hasn’t been watching UCLA.

by nbrans on Feb 14, 2009 8:57 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

However

Not sure if Amare is better than those 2 (it’s a little early to tell), but i think youv’e summed his situation up nicely

by batso on Feb 14, 2009 9:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If Amare walks

You suddenly have a ton of cap space to work with. You’re going to have that risk with any player who isn’t locked up for several years.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 14, 2009 10:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not necessarily

If the Kings are over the cap but just below the tax threshold you’re not actually going to end up with that much cap room if he bolts.

by nbrans on Feb 14, 2009 10:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd gladly take Amare over Griffin

But, there’s no way I’d give up Rubio for him. What if it were a top 3 restricted pick? That way if it falls below the third pick we know we’re not getting Rubio.

Personally I’d rather try to get LaFrentz and a pick from Portland and send that pick, along with Houston’s, over to Phoenix. Then Petrie can really sell it by pointing out how good late first rounders, like Rajon Rondon and Rudy Fernandez, can be

www.mancancook.net

by vfettke on Feb 14, 2009 9:31 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

And Rubio is overrated.

The whole Spanish team is overrated because of the Olympics.

by ZenBaller on Feb 14, 2009 10:00 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not the whole Spanish team

Guys like Fernandez, Navarro and the Gasols played as well as advertised, and in Navarro’s case, better.

But I think Rubio is overrated.

by nbrans on Feb 14, 2009 10:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm 100%

It’s a trade that could turn this franchise around like the rock for cwebb did.

by KingsFan on Feb 14, 2009 10:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Here is the flipside tho the odds that no one mentions - maybe because it is obvious

There is a worst case scenario 77.55% chance the Kings DON’T get the 1-2 pick for 2009
There is a best case scenario 57.2% chance the Kings DON"Tt get the 1-2 pick for 2009

Play the ESPN’s Draft Lottery http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/lottery2009/mockdraft and run it 20 times in a row. I get very frustated becasue it has the Kings with the most likely chance of #1 and they don’t get it every time. That’s because it runs these odds on a random numberr generator which is a close reproduction of the actual ping pong ball lottery.

You can cross your fingers just so much. I have said this earlier in a post – Amare is PROVEN the other guys are hopefuls. We can debate the proper draft order of 2009 four years from now. I would rather have the poison I know.

by betweentheeyes on Feb 14, 2009 10:20 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

and another thing...

rolling the dice, spinning the wheel… playing the lottery…

If I were to ask you to give me your money, say $10,000 and I tell you that there is
1) a best case 57% chance you will double your investment in 12 months
                             OR
2) a 100% chance that I will increase your investment by 40% (the odds that not only would Amare produce in Sacramento but he would be a mainstay for years to come). I obvious made up 40% but I figure 50% was too high, and if it didn’t work out we would sign and trade for someone else which is worth something.

Would you do it?

If you take Griffin or Rubio – wouldn’t you all agree that if either were a 4 time All-Star you would be pleasantly surprised ? I don’t get the controversy here.

by betweentheeyes on Feb 14, 2009 10:38 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd take choice 2 even if the guarantee was only 10-15%.

But your example doesn’t translate for me because you have a guarantee and then modify it by the odds of something happening.

I propose this:

Bet your 10k on roulette.

1) money on Black(~50%) – you win you double it(Griffin or Rubio)

2) money on 1-12(~33%) – you win you triple your money(trade for Amare and he resigns and plays well)

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Feb 14, 2009 4:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Upon further concideration, I don't like this either

because the downside is not the same. So amend the choices as follows:

1)comes up Red, you still get to keep $5000(still a top 5 pick in GP’s hands).

2) comes up 13-24, you get to keep $5000(Amare plays well for 1-2 seasons and either walks or his knees give out)
2) comes up 25-36, you lose it all(Amare pouts and forces a trade or walks or his knees give out quickly)

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Feb 14, 2009 5:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

If it was top 2 protected.

Shut up and Coach

by Carl on Feb 14, 2009 11:17 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

i think the point of this post

is that it wouldn’t. If it’s top 2 protected, you’d have to throw in another asset.

by Viliphied on Feb 14, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No

And only reason is that he could bolt town (after one year) and leave us w/ nothing to show for the trade.

by sactown on Feb 14, 2009 11:24 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

except

 for 17 million off the books. But I see your point.

by shadow1480 on Feb 14, 2009 12:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

re:

Which in effect would be trading JT and our #1 for Amare’s Expiring Contract. No way!

by sactown on Feb 14, 2009 12:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

no

the poll asked if you would trade the 1st rounder and expiring contracts. Nothing about JT. If JT’s included, no way you do that.

by shadow1480 on Feb 14, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There's a 100% chance our draft pick is here in 4 years if we want him.

Amare is going to cost more than our 09 draft pick.
Amare is going to eat up more of our cap space than our #1 pick.
Amare is more likely not to be here in 4 yrs when we’ll need him to contend.
Amare’s cost per pt & cost per rebound will be more than JT’s.
Amare will be worth less than what we’ll pay Phoenix if he forces a sign & trade in 2010.
Amare will not get this team into the playoffs next year.
Amare will improve our win record but hurt our 2010 draft position.
Amare could exercise his ETO and leave us with nothing in return

The opinions expressed have between 50 & 100% chance of being accurate

TZ used a players ability + his contract to determine his value to the team. So, lets try it with Amare. In 3 yrs when Amare demands a Max contract extension, will his cost versus production be worth more than JT’s. No, even if Amare is putting up 25/15, while JT is putting up 18/9. JT would have to make over $14.5M to cost more. Now, what is the worth of the production of a #1 or #2 draft pick in their 3rd yr of their rookie contract. In 3 yrs when we hope to be a contender, Amare will cost more and produce less the our 08 & 09 1st round picks combined.

Though his value as a player is high, his cost to the rebuilding of the team is too high.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Feb 14, 2009 12:52 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I mostly agree that if the Kings improve next year it hurts their lottery position

which is a solid point. It also means that we fans will have to endure another horrible season to start to show signs of improvement which is a truth that is hard to swallow.

I will argue however, that your comment:

when we hope to be a contender, Amare will cost more and produce less the our 08 & 09 1st round picks combined.

is using the assumption that the draft choices will deliver worthwhile production.

It is using known vs. unknown.

As far as JT and his possible production:

No, even if Amare is putting up 25/15, while JT is putting up 18/9. JT would have to make over $14.5M to cost more

If Jason Thompson is pulling 18/9 in three years he will demand the max as well. Also, I have the expectation that after the next CBA re-evalution in two years ALL salaries will go down, possibly even existing ones (see lockout, NHL). but that just moves the reference point. I also think if we shoot future forward as you do – If the Kings get 3 or 4 keepable first rounders who are all starters you are talking about alot of max contracts coming due along with whatever other pieces management can acquire to build a contender. Heady stuff.

by betweentheeyes on Feb 14, 2009 1:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No way

An 18/9 guy is getting max money…not in this economy.

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 14, 2009 2:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

these are the Kings we are talking about

Webber, Bibby, Bonzi, Cisco, Beno – you see a pattern there?

by betweentheeyes on Feb 14, 2009 2:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

c'mon

the point is overpayment. Paying too much. Bidding against themselves.

by betweentheeyes on Feb 14, 2009 3:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And I was only replying

To your statement about “max money”. It’s an important distinction, honestly. The above comment, I can agree with. Although I think the jury is still out on Cisco and Beno (I think a lousy record breeds unnecessary impatience occasionally).

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 14, 2009 6:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

fair enough

bad teams have bad stats and bad players can look worse, good players can look worse and their numbers are always questioned. Mediocre players just become more insignificant.

by betweentheeyes on Feb 15, 2009 7:26 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

In 2010 Amare is owed $17M unless he opts out.

In 2010/2011 JT will be in the 1st option yr of his rookie contract at $2.2M , and if Amare doesn’t opt out he’ll be owed $17.7M. That’s a difference of $15.5M in that yr alone. If we have to give him a Max contract to resign him that makes the difference near $17.7M. In 2011/2012 JT makes $3M to Amare’s $20+. So, in the 2 option yrs of JT’s contract Amare will cost $35M more than JT.

Amare’s career aver is 21ppg & 8.9rpg. Even if JT doesn’t get any better than he is today, I can’t justify paying Amare $50M more than JT over the next 3 yrs. You should be able to get a lot of talent with a 3yr/$50M contract.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Feb 14, 2009 2:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Difference is

Some of Amare’s salary will pay itself off in ticket sales. You gotta admit, he’d be a bit of a draw over what the Kings have now, especially if they add another player or two.

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 14, 2009 3:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

People pay to see wins and Mega-Stars

Amare may not help us win any more than JT or our #1 pick will. And, he isn’t someone people pay to see play like LeBron or Wade or Paul. The point is his production isn’t great enough over JT’s to warrant the increase in Cost. Isn’t that why Phoenix is willing to let him go. If it was only cap space, they’d keep him and let Shaq go.

Take the money and go after someone to fill a position of real need. Sessions is a RFA, offer him the money you saved from not signing Amare. You think we could get someone exciting and good for 4yrs and $50M.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Feb 14, 2009 3:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What's your aversion

To adding supremely talented young players to the roster?

Are you under the impression that GP would trade for Amare, put his feet up on his desk and say “Ok, we’re all done…go get em guys!”? Not likely.

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 14, 2009 3:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Let me ask you this Otis (as I depart)

How does Petrie revamp this roster having giving up most of it’s best asset’s to do an Amare deal?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Feb 14, 2009 3:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Depends on the deal

I’m in the pro-Amare camp, but not if it involves losing JT in the deal, or the #1. Probably not enough to get the job done with Phoenix, I know…but that’s where I am.

And any deal for Amare is going to ship out just as much salary (or nearly so) as we take in correct?

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 14, 2009 3:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Phoenix would prefer to have a deal that ends up with the Amare receiving team getting more money

Than what they take back. (They give up Amare, and take back 12 million dollars. Something like that.)

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Feb 14, 2009 3:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The cap implications of the deal are important

And the Kings don’t want to take additional salary either, so this deal is probably DOA already. Unless a third team is in the mix.

However, I find it hard to believe that trading for Amare now is going to kill the franchise unless they aren’t able to clear Miller or K9 off the books as well. Down the road, in a resigning situation is a different story though.

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 14, 2009 6:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry

There is no Amare deal without either JT or a No. 1 or both.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 14, 2009 8:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How do you feel about that?

Originally, I felt Hawes was a better long-term fit in the backcourt with Amare, but the more I think about it, the more JT should be untouchable.

I’m down with the Kings making an aggressive pitch to get Amare, but still trying to figure out what the limits should be.

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 15, 2009 8:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Errrr...

“backcourt” = “frontcourt”

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 15, 2009 8:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

people will come and see the #1 (or #2, or possibly #3)

just as much as Amare. If you lose with Amare – say go, 4-11, they stay home anyway. Wins fill the stands.

If this current team matches Atlanta’s record (31-21) and basically evenly starred (If the Kings have this record KMart makes the All-Star team, JT makes the Rookie squad) the attendence would be much higher than it is.IMO

by betweentheeyes on Feb 14, 2009 4:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well winning always helps

But if you’re a lousy team, but you have a compelling player you’ll sell some additional tickets.

It’s kind of a silly idea anyways – I think the addition of Amare would not only help the Kings win a few more games, but the additional moves Petrie will be making should help as well.

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 14, 2009 6:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah,

If we get Amare, I think GP needs to go all in this summer. Have to find a way to get one more all-star caliber player to go with Kevin and Amare. Otherwise I think Amare puts us firmly in the middle.

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Feb 14, 2009 6:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That's the point

Adding a Stoudemire makes us relevant and makes adding additional key players relevant. It can be the first domino in the Kings rebirth.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 14, 2009 8:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

but if we don't have enough left to add more

thru trade or FA, can’t wait for Hawes/JT/rookie to develop, the Amare deal would screw us.

That’s the counter point.

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Feb 14, 2009 9:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Depending on who you trade

You’d probably still have most of two No. 1s in the next two years (assuming you trade one of the three, Hawes or JT, Miller, Salmons, Garcia and everyone else but Martin and the expirings you give Phoenix as trade bait.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 14, 2009 9:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If we have to give up this year's #1 and JT to get Amare

Next year’s pick is likely to be in the mid teens and won’t help in the short term. And we’d need to compete in the short term because Amare can opt out at the end of next season.

If we get Amare, we’d damn well better be able to make the playoffs next season and have the pieces in place so that it looks like we are in contention for home court the following year, or it’s just not worth the risk of Amare walking.

Maybe JT can develop in time, maybe this year’s #1 can develop in time, I doubt Miller/Salmons/Hawes can bring us another borderline all-star.

If we have to give up JT and this year’s #1, I don’t think it can work and I think that’s what it will take to get him here. If we can get him for only one of those, maybe it can work, but I’m not really confident.

If we could get him for Hawes and next year’s #1, I think you have to roll the dice on that one.

I’d feel much better contemplating these decisions at this time next season, talking about trading for Bosh, with a similar record and Rubio in the bank planning on coming over in the fall.

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Feb 14, 2009 9:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I am thinking

JT and NEXT year’s No. 1 as part of a package that could include Salmons and most of our expirings. That way we still have both of this year’s picks and can sign a decent free agent or free agents when Miller and some of the other gents peel off our cap.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 14, 2009 10:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And at that

I am assuming Phoenix thinks as much of JT as we do, which quite frankly is doubtful.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 14, 2009 10:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

One more thing

If we get lucky and get the No. 1 pick, having Stoudemire could be helpful in the process of convincing Rubio to declare. He may not be interested in joining a losing franchise that doesn’t look committed to trying to build a winner. And adding Rubio to the mix could in turn convince Stoudemire to resign. Dominos.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 14, 2009 10:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of ifs

5 more days?

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Feb 14, 2009 11:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We have a chance to get an All-Star

and you want to get Ramon Sessions. That’s a real game changer.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 14, 2009 8:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You're assuming a linear relationship

between production and worth, which doesn’t hold up.

Let’s put it this way, which is more valuable?

Player A’s production has improved from 12/6 to 17/8.
Player B improved from 17/8 to 22/10.
Player C from 22/10 to 27/12.
Player D from 27/12 to 32/14.

The player that made the most difficult improvement is player D, even though the statistics change by the same amount. Its all about getting away from the norm. An average player is very inexpensive (relatively). The further you get along the bell curve of productivity, the more valuable each step up is.

All of this is a long winded way of saying there’s a bigger difference between 25/15 and 18/9 than you are acknowledging. That being said, I’m with you, I’ve always been against Amare for anything more than 1 of Hawes/JT/our #1 + filler.

by ForThree on Feb 14, 2009 2:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Amare has never average more than 25ppg & 9.1rpg

He’s a 6 yr pro with a career aver. or 21/8.9 and this yr he’s averaging 21/8.1. And, although your theory may be correct, I think we’re talking about 2 Player B’s. One averaging 17/8 and one averaging 22/10. So financially to pay the higher aver 7 time more than you pay the lower average would be fiscally irresponsible.

Even if Amare resigns with us, over the next 3yrs alone he’ll cost $50M more than JT under his rookie contract. So, we could keep JT & our draft choices and still sign a big name player to a 3yr $50M contract for 5pt & 2reb of perduction from the PF position.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Feb 14, 2009 3:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

True on his statistics

But if you can’t see that the guy’s numbers are down this year based on the situation in Phoenix and the addition of Shaq, I don’t know what to tell you. It’s WHY THE GUY MIGHT BE ATTAINABLE.

He’s also 26 years old. A potential of 25ppg and 9rpg plus an entertaining style of game brought into ARCO sounds damn good right now.

You keep comparing having JT versus having Amare, how about you combine them instead? Rotate in a defensive minded big man, and you’ve got your frontcourt for a good portion of the next decade.

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 14, 2009 3:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I thought it was understood that Phoenix wants a PF in return.

so I felt that the deal only goes down with JT+expiring+draft choices.

But, I don’t doubt Amare’s talent and what it would add to the team. I just think he cost too much for what he brings. And, without young talent and cap space this rebuild slows down for at least a yr.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Feb 14, 2009 3:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I'm not onboard with JT as part of the deal at this point

Hawes, I would be ok with. I didn’t hear that Phoenix specifically wanted a PF in return, just young talent, draft picks and expirings.

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 14, 2009 3:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's reported they wanted Aldridge from Portland.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Feb 14, 2009 3:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You know who else wants Aldridge?

Portland. Although if push came to shove, I guess they’d do it. Not if they had to give up Bayless too though.

by Aykis16 on Feb 14, 2009 8:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The difference
In 3 yrs when Amare demands a Max contract extension, will his cost versus production be worth more than JT’s. No, even if Amare is putting up 25/15, while JT is putting up 18/9. JT would have to make over $14.5M to cost more.

The difference is that a guy putting up 18-9 might get you to the second round, while a guy putting up 25 and 10 might get you a championship. It takes special, superstar talent to win a championship. Amare may or may not have what it takes, but I believe Thompson will only ever be a good player, not a superstar. Price/performance is great, but pure superstar level performance gets you title contention.

Shut up and Coach

by Carl on Feb 14, 2009 3:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

One last time, Amare isn't a great rebounder or defender at least not $20M worth

Check the NBA.com individual stats. Adjusted for 48 mins, Amare comes up at 10.5 rpg because he plays 38mpg. That ranks him 127 among all players. In the west he ranks at 33 among Forwards. Hawes ranks at 21 & JT ranks at 15. Among all players in the west Amare is ranked 65, Hawes is 51, and JT is 39 in rebounds per 48mins.

Now, Amare ranks 9th in pts per 48min. But, and again I’m going to bring up the money, Martin makes $11M putting up 25ppg, so is Amare worth twice what Martin makes?

And, I don’t believe a 25 & 10 guy gets you a championship. Phoenix has Amare, and 3 all-stars and their not winning a championship. So, how is he going to get us there, with 1st & 2nd yr players and MLE vets, plus Martin. That’s even if he doesn’t bail on us in 2010.

We’re already a high scoring team, what we need is interior defense & rebounding. With the money you end up paying Amare, you can probably make offers to Lee or Millsap, and Sessions or Felton that their teams wont match.

If we were a contender, then I might say trade for him. But, were not, so trading away talent and picks plus the money we pay him hurts us from acquiring more talent. We’ll end up where we were last year. A mid draft team with no cap space and unable to get out of the 1st round. And, hoping GP finds a sleeper with our draft pick in the 12-20 range.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Feb 14, 2009 11:20 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Two things to take into consideration when reviewing Amare's stats

He scores 21 points on 14 shots. Get him a few more shots and he’s a 25+ point guy. Think of that for a minute. You could have Amare and Kevin both scoring about 25 pts. a game each at high efficiency.

His rebounding has been down since the arrival of Shaq. This is not rocket science. JT’s rebounding numbers would drop if he were playing with Shaw.

As I have said, I respect the folks that don’t want Amare coming here. But let’s be fair when doing statistical analysis on this four-time all star.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Feb 15, 2009 12:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude's never averaged 10 boards a game

before Shaq, after Shaq, on Shaq’s back, never.

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Feb 15, 2009 1:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Right

He’s averaged 9 – good enough for me.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Feb 15, 2009 8:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

9 is good enough?

This team has been a poor rebounding team for how many yrs? It’s hurt us in 2nd chance points both for and against, and it’s hurt us in fast break points. And, you think a PF playing 38mpg and getting 9 rebounds is good enough and worth $20M+ a year. Well, maybe your right that he is worth the money, but for my money I’ll keep JT and spend the money I save on a FA.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Feb 15, 2009 2:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Far be it from me...

…to clarify a Section124 post, but I thought he meant it was good enough in consideration of what else Amare brings to the table.

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 16, 2009 6:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Right

There are about 15 guys that are ahead of Amare in overall PER that have a better rebounding rate than him.

There are about 4 guys overall PER that have a better true shooting percentage than him.

Yao MIng, Pao Gasol and Shaq are the only players in the NBA that are scoring and rebounding at a higher PER rate than Stoudemire.

This doesn’t mean that you should love or want Stoudemire. But I think that his game has earned a modicum of respect. Just my opinion.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Feb 16, 2009 11:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I certainly didn't diss him.

My whole point has been on value vs salary. Who has more value Amare with 25/9 for $20M, or Salmons with 20/5 for $5M + JT with 10/7 for $2M. JT + Salmons put up more pts and get more rebounds at 1/3rd the cost.

But, it’s all acedemic anyways, if we don’t move Miller or K9, trading for Amare puts us over the Luxury Tax this year, and the Maloofs will never do that.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Feb 16, 2009 5:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Feb 16, 2009 5:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

If you are evaluating Stoudamire on this year’s stats, I think you’re missing the whole point of the discussion.

Mambo King

by otis29 on Feb 15, 2009 8:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

With everyone thinking he's going to drastically improve our team

Think of it this way. We NEED a PG. I cannot stress this enough. We’re trading off a bunch of contracts and our first rounder for 1 1/2 years of Amare, basically.

Adding superstars doesn’t drastically improve a team. Team cohesion and having one solid style of play, consistent with every team members’ style of game. This is what fucked the Suns over. They added Shaq into their run and gun offense, then gutted their coach who created it.

I just don’t see “run and gun” with Hawes, or Beno (cause his passing is just so horrid at this point). I can see trading off Hawes. I can’t see trading off 4 years of potentially a #1 or #2 pick for temporary 1 1/2 year help to put our team in 10th place.

by CloudyEyes on Feb 14, 2009 1:14 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Talent
Think of it this way. We NEED a PG.

You’re right, but there are no near-superstar 26 year old point guards on the market right now.

Adding superstars doesn’t drastically improve a team. Team cohesion and having one solid style of play, consistent with every team members’ style of game.

Talent makes teams better. The Kings don’t have enough right now. Stoudemire gives them a lot more.

Shut up and Coach

by Carl on Feb 14, 2009 4:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My intentions have been made clear

Don’t want Amare. Want Rubio. Dumping players for cap space. But here would be the ultimate best scenario if you’re Geoff Petrie. Ricky Rubio declaring for the 2010 draft, and you nabbing him that year, as well as nabbing Griffin in 2009. That changes the dynamic of this franchise completely. That is, unless, of course you’re talking about something else. I also think this team will continue to dump salary because it matters.

Do I think Rubio will come out? Yes, I do for a few reason’s. A his buyout won’t go down in 2010, and if his buyout is at 7 million euro’s, he can obviously negotiate a fixed price on that buyout, and buy it out before the euro rise’s again. (Or the dollar perhaps.) It’s a bit of a skewed argument I admit, but it’s hard for me to see Rubio not declaring with the likelihood of him being a first or second pick this year or next. Whether he comes over is another matter. That’s another matter altogether. That being said, this team needs 2 stars, and if Jason Thompson isn’t it, and Donte Greene doesn’t emerge, for whatever reason, then the 2010 draft will need to wield the same level of talent that the 2009 draft could for this team.

I think the Kings will consider buying out Kenny Thomas or Brad Miller if they can get a favorable buyout. That is assuming they can’t dump either salary. (I also think this puts the Portland possibility into play. I still think they have a great chance ot make a move here with regarding to Salmons, and not take on excessive salary—Thomas/Salmons— to make a deal work. This would be in antithesis to a bigger name like Richard Jefferson. For instance anyway. A Pure salary dump is still just that. If you’re the Maloof’s and you dump a significant amount of salary, and you get a pick like Griffin or Rubio, and the fans won’t come out, then you have a problem. Until then, I don’t think the franchise is in real trouble. Not yet anyway.)

Bottom line, I like the position this team is in if the Maloof’s don’t spend all of Petrie’s time talking about their financial position first. Look at the damage this is doing to Phoenix.I can understand not doing a bad financial deal. I can understand calculating the odd’s on Rubio/Griffin, and which one you think is best. But if you don’t dump salary, and some dead weight on this roster, it’s going to make the fix that much more difficult. Of course, it’s also going to make the roster cheaper too eventually. What worries so much is that this roster is so expensive, AND so bad. What worries me is that the Maloof’s financial situation is so prominently mentioned constantly. I hope this is a blip on the radar screen, but I fear it is not.

Have a good the rest of the All-Star weekend folks.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Feb 14, 2009 3:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

One Question

TZ, how did you get the table you have into your post? I wanted to make a table this morning, but couldn’t figure out a way of doing so without making an image and uploading it, which I didn’t have the patience to do.

Is there an easy way for us mortals to make tables in our FanPosts or is it something you have to have super admin fu to do?

by ForThree on Feb 14, 2009 5:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Try here

Try here

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Feb 14, 2009 6:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Or here

Or here

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Feb 14, 2009 6:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Before I tabled it

You can actually just copy over tables I think, using the WSYIMG editor 4 3. So, I used a lot of 82games.com on my anti-Amare rant, but it was just a copy & paste deal. (I thought it was really complicated, but it was really easy.)

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Feb 16, 2009 2:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Pick and expirings for Amare.... sure! but after the lottery (if it gets to that point)

As long as we know Rubio is not coming out I would do that trade. I know waiting is tricky but if Amare is still a Sun after the trade deadline then our chnces increase exponentially. I think there is a big chance Amare is not going to be traded before the deadline. I don’t think the Suns are going to gie him away just for the hell of it. They better get what they want and if they don’t, they could easily wait for the summer.

The reason I mentionRubio is that we need a PG and cannot, IMO, not pick Rubio if available (double negative ya’ll…. what!). To know if he’s declaring and if we had the pick to get him means we need to wait for the lottery and make decisions from there. By then, we would also be able to make an educated decision whether Griffin or the other prospects are going to help this team more than Amare would, not only then but also in the future.

I know he has a chance of leaving in ’10 but with a rotation up front of Amare, Hawes, and JT with (a year older) Speed and Cisco we could have a nice foundation for big things. Worse case scenario we sign and trade him or let him expire.

A lot of this also depends on the Kings dumping the bad contracts and don’t forget about the coach. If we get Eddie Jordan (not advocating, just talking possibilities) and go to run and gun don’t you think Amare may want to stick around?? Just saying…..

"Let's stop arguing and get together and agree on who really is the problem: PEACHES" - HighTops

by eduardo_m7 on Feb 14, 2009 7:06 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.
Start posting about the Kings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Spaceshaolinninja_small
NCAA Hoops Preview from the Kings' Perspective
Zebulon_small
Jason Thompson, Foul Machine
Eastern_logs_small
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Week 3
Old_logo_gif_small
Pookeyguru's Salary Cap FAQ

Recent FanPosts

200751153242283_small
That was then...
Small
Spencer Hawes's failing grade
Small
Searching for a backup center
Small
If the Kings Lose Tonight it's All My Fault...
S5000963_small
Break Down of New Possible Trade
___small
Kings Remain Active in Trade Talks
Tyreke_yahoo_small
Okafor vs. Our Bigs
Small
The Trade Block

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Local Sponsors


Editor

Loofie_small Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Authors

Banana2_small Exhibit G