Sactown Royalty: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

John Whisenant's Name Re-enters the Derby

It's like Groundhog's Day, only more bizarre. From Sam Amick:

John Whisenant, the Monarchs' general manager, was the front-runner for the Kings' head-coaching job in 2006 before Eric Musselman was hired. Whisenant now appears to be the unofficial front-runner again if Natt does not return. [...]

While Kings basketball president Geoff Petrie was resistant then to hiring a coach whose close ties with Kings co-owners Joe and Gavin Maloof have been well-chronicled and who has no NBA experience, the dynamic is different now in light of a somewhat-recent addition.

Kings consultant Pete Carril, a close friend of Petrie's and his former coach at Princeton, likely would be on Whisenant's staff if he were hired and would continue to have a strong influence on the team's offense.

As I wrote at length the last time Whisenant's name popped up, this is not about his pedigree or the coach on his own catwalk. I will defend any team who thinks outside the box on a coach -- the league has proven time after time that there is no formula for coaching success in the NBA. Just because the man's last job was coaching women's basketball should never disqualify him for the job. Arguing otherwise is short-sighted, close-minded and frankly sexist. The league is different, but no more foreign than the WAC, the ACC or the Euroleague. In the end, basketball has the same rules all over the world ... with minor league-specific details.

My problem has been that Geoff Petrie, the architect of the greatest teams in the Sacramento era, a multiple-time Executive of the Year, hasn't been able to hire his own head coach since 1998. Eric Musselman, as has been reported extensively, was a compromise candidate (with -- ironically -- Whisenant as the Maloof candidate). Reggie Theus was a Maloof hire as Petrie pushed for Brian Shaw (who still doesn't have a head coaching job, by the way) and Scott Brooks. Petrie has made mistakes -- he's not Basketball Jesus. But I trust his judgment on all matters basketball a lot more than I trust the judgment of the Maloof family. Whisenant is a Maloof hire. Plain and simple.

Petrie allowed himself to get cajoled into Musselman, and he allowed a situation in which the Maloofs could make a full court press regarding Theus. He's letting these things happen -- he could have a job tomorrow if he quit today, and he's not quitting. So these decisions can't be taken off his resumé entirely. It just seems so odd, so bizarrely timed that Petrie or one of his confidants would start letting it be known publically that he's OK with Whisenant so long as Carril sticks around. Petrie could fight this and have every fan in Sacramento at his sails. But he's taking it. He's compromising. Again.

I don't get it from any angle. Maybe Whisenant is the right coach. But why now? Why in this fashion?

0 recs  |  Comment 46 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Sactown Royalty

Still Waiting for a New Era

Dec 2008 by Ziller - 8 comments

The Stakes for Jason Levien

Nov 2008 by Ziller - 22 comments

Comments

Display:

I'm sure there is

a financial aspect to this. How much less would Whiz be than Eddie Jordan? Or Flip Saunders for that matter?

I don’t like the idea of choosing Whisenant over more pedigreed NBA coaches especially after the bitch-slap he took from Laimbeer during the last Monarchs’ Championship run. He got straight bullied right out of a championship. But if the Maloofs are so bent on trying him out as a Kings coach, why not next year? Next years Kings (most likely) still won’ t be a threat to contend. If Whiz can be had for cheap, give him a shot. Third time is a charm?

The biggest sacrifice with Whiz is possibly another go-round on the Kings coaching carousel. It’s not like Whisenant can be much worse than Natt. Which unfortunately is the best thing I can say about for him.

Frank Army

by BPaoliano on Apr 3, 2009 7:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't want any more warmup coaches.

It’s time to let Petrie choose the real deal based on his vision for this team. Whoever our next coach is needs to come in knowing, and having his players know, that he is the guy who will be guiding this team for the foreseeable future.

A lonely Kings fan in a sea of gold and purple...

by Jaycee on Apr 3, 2009 7:57 AM PDT reply actions   3 recs

+1

They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time.

by what_the_crap on Apr 3, 2009 8:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Amen

Another go around? This is just getting annoying. Check the Maloof’s Fantasy teams at the door.

Bé foréwarnéd: I am a mémbér of StR Groupthink méntality.

by CAB on Apr 3, 2009 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Amen

At this point, the team has bottomed out (at least we hope). No more taking chances on inexperienced guys (and this includes TT, too). We need to find an experienced coach to grow with and guide this team on the way back up. Another one and done coach could set the rebuild back a couple more years. This team needs some stability and consistency, but I worry that consistent Maloof meddling means consistent losing.

by LPKingsFan on Apr 3, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look at the Bright Side...

There’s still a very real possibility the team could move to Kansas City!

There is still a real possibility this team could move to Kansas City right?

by rbiegler on Apr 3, 2009 8:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I disagree w/ your assessment on pedigree

People get hired for jobs based on their credentials, pedigree etc. I would have a problem with Whisenant because he is a WNBA coach and has no NBA experience. This is really bad if they hire Whisenant even with 100% of Geoff Petrie’s approval.

I just don’t understand why you would consider John Whisenant as a full time head coach.

I want to point something out John Whisenant’s defensive schemes could be hard for NBA players to buy into for a full 48 minutes a night and on a 82 game season. What they do is they put lots of pressure on the ball for like 3/4 courts and force turnovers and get out on the break. The Whisenant system often yields high FG% but fewer possessions so the pace of the game is slower. Offensive rebounding is major hallmark of Whisenant’s teams.

  

BOOK IT!

by kingme18 on Apr 3, 2009 8:38 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That and the weave

If I remember correctly, Whisenant actually ran the Weave when he was with the Monarchs. Are the Kings going to run their offense like a High School Junior Varsity team?

by Carl on Apr 3, 2009 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong coach.

That was 2 coaches before him. Sonny something-or-other.

by mayfieldcol on Apr 3, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong! Bad! Wrong! Bad!

The Whizzenator as the Answer? Who are the Maloof’s kidding? Themselves, I guess. Is Whiz better than the rest of the candidates available?

If you argue the HC’s salary is an issue, how many less tick’s will be sold when Whiz’s name is introduced, instead of Flip’s? Or L Frank’s? Or E Jordan’s?

Use Whiz as a place setting because the team will stink next year, too? Are you certain they will stink? Would they stink because of Whiz? How much respect will he command from the team (start all the Monarch jokes…)? The Kings don’t need someone to warm a spot. They need to find The Answer (not Iverson)!

The thought that Coachie would babysit Whiz is ludicrous. No offense, and I absolutely love Coachie, but his days of active day to day involvement are long past. An advisor/consultant postion is perfect, but holding the bag for the Whizzenator is not gonna happen.

When did GP become The Wimp? Stand up to the bros’ and insist you hire your own guy or you get outta town. I know that’s not his style, and I would hate to see GP go, but if Joe and Gavin want to ruin the team by meddling too much, then every man for themself…

by StepUp on Apr 3, 2009 9:04 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Couple of things

The WNBA and the NBA are not similar. Very differenty types of basketball with the WNBA being played and at a much lower level. (Most of the time, it’s almost unbearable to watch because the athleticism and skill level generally is just not very good. Hopefully, Ailene V isn’t reading this!!!)

Secondly, Whisenant is supposed to be a defensive guru and the Maloofs have beeen talking “D” since we lost that series to the Lakers more than half a decade ago. The things is, though, that a team needs defensively skilled players to play great defense. I don’t care who the coach is, this team, as presently assembled, will never play great defense. They simply do not have the necessary skill set or athletic ability.

I do, however, think that with a couple of additions and some time to mature that this has the makings of a potentially very, very good offensive team.

Whiz does not appear to be the most qualified person for the job.

by Kusian on Apr 3, 2009 9:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What kills me Kus

Is that the Maloofs don’t have a problem with Petrie (an offensive talent evaluator), but somehow expect better defensive action from the coach. I’m with TZ. I don’t get this at all.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Apr 3, 2009 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Specifically with this:

The WNBA and the NBA are not similar. Very differenty types of basketball with the WNBA being played and at a much lower level. (Most of the time, it’s almost unbearable to watch because the athleticism and skill level generally is just not very good.

This seems to directly counter TZ’s statement:

Just because the man’s last job was coaching women’s basketball should never disqualify him for the job. Arguing otherwise is short-sighted, close-minded and frankly sexist.

But TZ, I would also say that success as a WNBA coach also does not necessarily qualify him to be an NBA coach either. True diversity involves recognizing differences, not ignoring them. The WNBA is a different style of basketball from the NBA, much as college hoops are a different style, and international leagues have different styles. You are right that there is no single solution for what is a “correct” coaching style for the NBA. But success at one level does not mean that someone will be successful at another. Ask Rick Pitino. Does this mean we shouldn’t give him a shot? Not necessarily. But why give him the shot instead of a proven NBA coach? That’s the real issue (which I believe is your view as well).

Never forget: I am a complete idiot

by Exhibit G on Apr 3, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The WNBA and the NBA are not similar. Very different types of basketball

I can agree with this.

Most of the time, it’s almost unbearable to watch because the athleticism and skill level generally is just not very good.

This seems to me to be a conclusion in search of a justification. The shooting, passing and dribbling in the women’s game is as good (or nearly as good) as it is in the men’s game. I’ll grant you that there is less dunking, but I don’t watch basketball for the dunks.

by Carl on Apr 3, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good grief Charlie Brown

Someone needs to break into Whisenant’s safe and burn the damn pictures already!

I’m curious if there has been any inquiry for Whisenant’s services in any capacity for an NBA team in the past? My guess is very few, if any.

If going Musselman-Theus-Natt-Whisenant wouldn’t complete the journey from legitimate NBA championship contender to complete laughingstock, I’m not sure what will.

by otis29 on Apr 3, 2009 9:25 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

I wonder whose pushing Whiz

Cuz really, among other things, it makes me wonder how much power Coleen Maloof holds in this decision.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Apr 3, 2009 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Those must be some pretty bad pics,

Because it’s not as if the Maloofs Bros. are regarded as classy or in a position to expound high moral values. Having said that, I would definitely party with them.

I’m thinking those pics must somehow involve farm animals.

"It's shyte being Scottish. We're the lowest of the low. The scum of the fuckin' Earth. The most wretched, miserable, servile, pathetic, trash that was ever shat into civilization. Some people hate the English. I don't. They're just wankers. We, on the other hand, are colonized by Wankers -- Can't even find a decent culture to be colonized by . . . It's a shyte state of affairs to be in...and all the fresh air in the world won't make any fuckin' difference!"

by PhutureKings on Apr 3, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we have seen the video and it is an embarssment
I’m thinking those pics must somehow involve farm animals.

I am talking of the Carl’s Jr. hamburger advertisement of course.

by betweentheeyes on Apr 3, 2009 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now that's funny!

“Someone needs to break into Whisenant’s safe and burn the damn pictures already!”

That’s good stuff, Otis!

by Kusian on Apr 3, 2009 9:34 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Only 1 problem with what you said TZ (and it's a minor quibble)

That Petrie didn’t have the choice to choose his coach since 1998. Rick Adelman turned out to be a good hire, and Jim Thomas deserves credit for that regardless of how Petrie felt. That being said, since 2006, it’s a much bigger deal. And, it is only a minor quibble.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Apr 3, 2009 10:22 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

yes, very confusing

Is it typical for NBA owners to make decisions on coaches? Yeah, it totally doesn’t make sense to me. GP should be the one trusted with that decision so there’s no conflict/compromise between the players he is assembling and the coach who is supposed to guide them.

If only the Kings could run it like in the NFL—have an offensive coordinator and a defensive coordinator AND a head coach. Then I wouldn’t mind having Whisenant as the defensive coordinator, along with Coachie as the offensive coordinator.

My vote goes to Eddie Jordan, who Petrie didn’t want to let go of before they brought in Rick Adelman.

put me in, Coach

by LaBradford on Apr 3, 2009 10:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I just threw up a bit of my breakfast

I have a rule, you can’t be coach unless you have a reasonable shot of being able to beat up one player on the team…or at least one announcer…sorry Jerry.
I need to go rinse and spit.

by ElRonToro on Apr 3, 2009 10:45 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

TZ

you make a great point about not disqualifying him because he coaches women’s ball because that would be incredibly sexist. I agree completely. We shouldn’t view him in a negative light because of this. However, it is incredibly likely that the players will have much less respect for him because of this. Maybe our players are better than this, but its strongly possible that they’ll just look at him as the girls’ coach

www.mancancook.net

by vfettke on Apr 3, 2009 10:47 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Is it sexist

If I would disqualify him because he coaches women’s basketball?

Because seriously, after 7th grade, the boys took over the game and I couldn’t compete with them anymore.

The way the games are played, the plays that are designed and run, are at a totally different level in the NBA than the WNBA. Whis might know the game, but so did Musselman.

This is not the time to get another rent-a-coach, or have another experiment. We have quite a bit of talent now, and we need a system for all of those guys to buy into with a coach that has credentials and credibility.

Coming to you live from the land of interim coaches.

by LeaguePassAddict on Apr 3, 2009 11:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Females are stupid

Slow, and bitchy all the time. Except, for the fact that they seem to make competent professionals (until you are competing with them for a job, and suddenly, affirmative action comes into play), and manage as adults to lead completely competent lives that include the same responsibilities as men.

Doesn’t mean that means anything when you’re talking about a head coach of a women’s basketball team. Maybe Pat Summit could coach a men’s team. Gino Auriemma ditto. But, at the same time, they have legacies in women’s college basketball. And there is something to be said that. And, to boot, are there more recognizable women’s coaches than either of those two? I’m betting no.

In short, women suck, but not because they’re women.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Apr 3, 2009 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

completely competent lives that include the same responsibilities as men

Seriously, Pookey, you guys would all die if you had half the responsibilities that I do.

Coming to you live from the land of interim coaches.

by LeaguePassAddict on Apr 3, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe our players are better than this, but its strongly possible that they’ll just look at him as the girls’ coach

Yeah well, the Kings can start bitching about having a girls coach at the exact same time they become good enough to compete in the WNBA.

by Carl on Apr 3, 2009 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

I repeat my disclaimer about coaching but

I think whoever is hired must be able to gain the players respect quickly, very important I think for a team who’s pyche & confidance may be in crisis.

To promote teamwork on the offensive and Especially(!) the defensive end the players need to buy into the next coach’s philosophy. Can another neophyte accomplish that? Especially in a league where perception and image, what people are saying, is so (unfortunatly) important?

I doubt it.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
- lend the eye a terrible aspect
and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Apr 3, 2009 10:51 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Looks like vfettke and I said aout the same thing at the same time . . .

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
- lend the eye a terrible aspect
and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Apr 3, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree...

Imagine this: It’s the first day of practice, the players are on the court stretching and getting loose. A whistle blows and they all turn to look at their new head coach, a man they are expected to trust, respect and learn from.
Two scenarios unfold:
1) The new head coach is someone like E. Jordan or Saunders, a coach who has been in the NBA, knows players, knows other teams’ tendencies, shows that the Maloofs and Petrie spared no expense in acquiring him, has had some success in the league, and instantly commands respect because of his name, proven abilities, and long-term status.
2) The new head coach is Whiz. Eyebrows are raised as the players’ first thought is something along the lines of “I wonder how long this dude is going to last, he has to prove himself first, or the Maloofs wanted to save some scratch.”

It is undeniable that in the first scenario the coach gets more respect, because he instantly starts with a higher level of esteem. Whiz starts at the ground floor, having to prove himself every step of the way. Is this the message that the Kings organization wants to set from day one of the new coach’s regime?

What’s needed is a breath of fresh, confident air. A sense of immediate respect, not only for the new coach, but for the players and organization as well. Whiz does not provide that. Whiz is another experiment in the “let’s see how this guy does” category.

I for one, am tired of that ride.

Lastly, if the new coach’s hope for survival depends on having Coachie’s hand in the bag, too, I’d rather just hire Carrill as the headcoach and get on w/ it. And what does that say about the new guy’s abilities if, upon him, you have to point out a caveat that he will be backed up by someone with more experience? Isn’t that why Theus brought in some older coaches – to lend credibility to his staff?

"It's shyte being Scottish. We're the lowest of the low. The scum of the fuckin' Earth. The most wretched, miserable, servile, pathetic, trash that was ever shat into civilization. Some people hate the English. I don't. They're just wankers. We, on the other hand, are colonized by Wankers -- Can't even find a decent culture to be colonized by . . . It's a shyte state of affairs to be in...and all the fresh air in the world won't make any fuckin' difference!"

by PhutureKings on Apr 3, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes, to protect the fragile psyche of the worst team in the league, let's...

…hold off for now on those plans to (a) hire the girls’ coach; (b) bring in the flamboyantly gay strength & conditioning asssistant; © take a flier on retiring Lisa Leslie with our 2nd round pick; or (d) replace the Kings Dancers with the cast from Queer Eye.

Just for now. A couple years from now, sure, our guys might be ready for that.

Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.

by Holmdel on Apr 3, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't see it happening

especially after responses like this thread. One thing the Maloofs do not like is bad PR, and hiring The Whizinator would bring bad PR that could result in losing season ticket holders. I certainly would not go see any game with The Whizinator coaching, while if Eddie Jordan was coaching next year, I would easily try to see 5 to 10 games a year. Wouldn’t suprise me if the Kings let this out to test the waters so to speak.

Didn’t one of the Maloofs say a couple of weeks ago that they were done with picking coaches and would let Petrie decide?

smell the ashes

by iamstern'skippah! on Apr 3, 2009 11:31 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

That's a good point skippah

This is not a move that will resonate well with season ticket holders. But, my question is this: How would season ticket holders feel about Mike Budenholzer?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Apr 3, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Probably not all that different

from Eddie Jordan or Jeff Van Gundy. But the thing is all three don’t have the stigma of being a Maloof cronie or having no NBA coaching/assistant coaching experience.

smell the ashes

by iamstern'skippah! on Apr 3, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Budenholzer...

He’d likely be seen the same way as Natt. Assistant coach getting first shot with a bad team. And that’s about it. No buzz, no thoughtful discussions, just another name with no experience coming on the scene with a hope and a prayer.

We let Scott Brooks get away. GP saw what the Thunder are seeing now. I say we stick a fat offer in front of his nose before the Okies do.

by StepUp on Apr 3, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's a virtual lock to return to OKC

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Apr 3, 2009 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I really hope

this is a calculated leak and the Maloofs take note of the reaction. But they haven’t shown too much PR savvy in the past, whether they want to avoid bad PR or not. In fact they’ve been doing a terrible job with PR of late.

by LPKingsFan on Apr 3, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't believe that Whiz is seriously being considered for Head Coach.

It make no sense on any level of the Alpha to the Omega of the basketball spectrum. When things were going well with the Kings, the Maloof brothers could dick around to their hearts content because the seats were full and all the numbers in the annual report were all printed in black. Now, hemorrhaging cash, forced to borrow money from the league and fly commercial (and which do you think hurts more?), their backs against the wall with this team and this city, our franchise a national joke if they are seriously considering John Whisenant as head coach they will have abdicated the roles as businessmen and indulged their egos as dilettantes.

"We are in the business of kicking butt and business is very, very good." - Charles Barkley

by Bluejohn on Apr 3, 2009 5:38 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with Bluejohn

I just can’t put a piece of believability that this is serious.I can’t, I won’t.

The simple fact of the matter – given all of TZ’s discussion and that of the rest of the comments here, that any fan of this team, even sign lady, will like or accept that decision.

Further, if Geoff Petrie, whom I have great respect for as a player, and Executive of the Year (twice), allows this to happen, than I would be a fan that would call for his dismissal.

You might as well trade Kevin Martin, Spencer Hawes and Jason Thompson because the future of this team and this franchise would be be lower -han-Clippers dismal.

by betweentheeyes on Apr 3, 2009 9:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just how DUMB are the MaGOOFS??

I am not a sexist. Or at least that is what that dumb bitch of a wife tells me. But lets be serious. There are 100 candidates that can be named off the top of your head that are more qualified to head coach an NBA Basketball team. So is it a matter of pride or price? How much is Eddie Jordan going to cost? Probably a lot less than all the empty seats in the Arena if the MaGoofs make the Monumental mistake of hiring Wiznutz. The MaGoofs just don’t know basketball, plain and simple. There has been too much evidence that has been compiled over the last +/- 15 years to suggest that the Magoofs REALLY dont know anything about NBA Basketball accept that they are passionate about it, and they own a team. Other than that, they should leave ALL Basketball decisions to Petrie. Petrie hasn’t done a stellar job as of late, but I would trust Petrie over any of the Magoof CLAN in a heartbeat when it comes to basketball decisions. If the Kings go with WISNUTZ, then the Magoofs will have made their absolutely worst decision since they decided that Rick Adelman wasn’t a good coach (HOF coach 5 years after he retires) If the Kings do NOT bring in a quality NBA coach with head coaching experience in the NBA, then the draft pick is meaningless. Meaningless because the team will regress no matter who they pick. The Kings need to go to an Eddie Jordan or a Flip Saunders and get a coach that can motivate and teach a young team. WIZNUTZ will be ignored from day ONE because he has NEVER been there and it just wont fly with the Kings Players, the Fans, The local Media, and the National Media. This STUPID IDEA NEEDS TO GO AWAY !! It needs to GO THE F%$K AWAY !!! Do you hear that MAGOOFS?? If you hire WIZNUTZ, then please move the team too so we dont have to watch it degenerate any further. WIZNUTZ has no NBA COACING EXPERIENCE, and no HC experience apart from coaching a girl team somewhere (does WNBA still even exist? That money loser league should have folded already…) OK, that sounded sexist… but really, are we as fans expected to just take this? Are we expected to just let WIZNUTZ get a pass and do a worst job than the other Magoof Hires like Mussleman (drunk driver) or Theus (hollywood hype)?? I’ll quit watching. I’ll quit going to the few games I go to now. If the KINGS do NOT follow the proper script and 1) Draft Blake Griffin with the #1 if they get it. #2, Get a real NBA Qualified Head Coach with NBA HC Experience, and #3, Use ALL of the cap money they have been hoarding to acquire another piece to make this club viable, I wont be the only fan to say ENOUGH !!!! STAY OUT OF THE DECISION PROCESS MAGOOFS !!! WIZNUTZ IT NOT COMPETENT AND YOUR LAST 2 CHOICES WERE LAME. LET PETRIE MAKE THE DECISIONS THAT IS WHAT YOU PAY HIM FOR !! LET GEOFF MAKE THE BASKETBALL DECISIONS BECAUSE YOU HAVE PROVEN THAT YOU CANT. PONY UP THE MONEY FOR A REAL NBA COACH AND QUIT TREATING THE FANS LIKE FOOLS. AND LASTLY, WIZNUTZ WILL NEVER BE A GOOD HEAD COACH ANYWHERE BUT THE WNBA AND MAYBE A TRANSGENDER TEAM IN EUROPE!! QUIT TRYING TO HIRE HIM FOR PEANUTS JUST TO EMPLOY AN OLD FAMILY FRIEND!!!

I have cut the Mouth and Nose out of my Paper Bag, but I am contemplating not cutting out any EYE HOLES so I don't have to watch this mess at all...

by FaStRmAn on Apr 7, 2009 9:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Paragraphs

They are your friend. 2 or 3 make them your BFF’s.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Apr 8, 2009 7:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Petrie is a genius!

I’m a 6ers fan (please don’t hold that against me even if you do care). There is no better basketball mind in the world than Mr. Petrie. He, in fact, isn’t perfect but who is? The fact is he has always drafted well and, comparitively, not wasted money has made these other GM’s look pedestrian.

The KIngs NEED Ricky Rubio. He’s the best talent in the draft this summer and, fortunately, not as hyped as Mr. Griffin. Mr. Griffin will be a great addition to any team, but name me one team that didn’t have an elite PG/“facilitator” (take that, KIngs fans!) to win a title in the last ten years and I’ll award you a delicious cookie. In this era (where hand-checks are called immediately and guard-play dictates everything), a superb talent at the 1 will make the climb up the ladder even more rapid than the drastic slide down it. Kevin Martin is one of the better 2’s in the game. Surround that guard attack with the ever-burgeoning games of Spencer Hawes and Jason Thompson and add one of the better swing-guards OFF THE BENCH in Francisco Garcia and they are a defensive-minded presence on the block and Donte Greene being halfway decent away from being a 40-win team in the tough West.

All this with an enviable cap position, a young core and a choice of coaches after this season and you’re looking at a very bright future. The one thing that no one should ever do is bank on Mr. Petrie being wrong. Chances are, he isn’t.

by Nutsy1122 on Apr 7, 2009 10:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh... if the Truth be Told.....

…… I bet Geoff Petrie is salivating at the thought of drafting Rubio. I get the feeling that Petrie thinks that Rubio is the next Peja but better. I think he is not showing his cards as usual, and is very high on Rubio. But there are a few GM’s out there who must know the value of a Ricky Rubio, and therefore the Kings must draft very high to get him. If Rubio declares, he has to go top 3 just to pay his bills with getting out of his euro contract and all. I believe with all things considered and all players available, Petrie is going to pick Rubio. There is too much upside and allstar potential. Griffin would be a solid player for years, but is he really going to come in and dominate the pro game like he does college. Everyone in the pros is athletic and strong. But Rubio has God given talent that only comes around once in a blue moon. His dribbling and passing ability alone are the stuff of legends (dont believe me, google youtube for Rubio and watch the videos…) The Kid has the uncanny knack for making plays and incredible passes. In fact, he makes incredible passes look simple. He has the quickest hands I have ever seen and when you combine that with a very high basketball IQ he gets a lot of steals just on pure talent. Sure, his shot isnt great now, but he is fundamentally sound and should improve in that area over time. But make no mistake, of all the players in this year’s draft, IMHO only Rubio has the ability to be an Allstar or MVP. All the others in the draft look pedestrian and average compared to Rubio and his incredible talent. Griffin is most NBA ready, but Rubio will be a household name in 4 years. Or to put it another way, there are 6 or 7 players around the league who are similar to Griffin in size and athletic ability. But how many players in the league have the raw passing ability and pg skills of Rubio? One or two this decade? If we end up with Griffin, it would be a good draft (although what do you do with JT??). If we end up with Rubio, the sky is the limit.

I have cut the Mouth and Nose out of my Paper Bag, but I am contemplating not cutting out any EYE HOLES so I don't have to watch this mess at all...

by FaStRmAn on Apr 8, 2009 6:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How could Rubio be Peja

when Peja was a SF and Rubio is a PG?

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

I am the stone that builder refused..I am the visual...The inspiration..That made lady sing the blues....I'm the spark that makes your idea bright.....The same spark that lights the dark....So that you can know your left from your right...I am the ballot in your box....The bullet in your gun...The inner glow that lets you know...To call your brother son....The story that just begun...The promise of what's to come...And I'm 'a remain a soldier till the war is won....

by pookeyguru on Apr 8, 2009 7:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.
Start posting about the Kings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
What to expect from Ime Udoka (psst, it's defense)
Zebulon_small
Sweet New Kings Pics!
Small
AnotherStupidRecap: The View from the Cheap Seats
Webber-and-williams-slam-401_small
Three Players
Small
Yet another Yahoo fantasy league

Recent FanPosts

Eastern_logs_small
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Week 2
Small
Time to give credit
Spence___jt_small
All Is Not Lost
Small
Martin MRI?
Inigo_small
LTTGs view Kings vs Hawks
Th_1180217288nba_28_small
Perimeter defense - The lost art
Small
Things I learned from watching the Hawks beat the Blazers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Local Sponsors


Editor

Loofie_small Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Authors

Banana2_small Exhibit G