Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Troubled Yankees Join Troubled Red Sox In Last Place

Options for Shoring up the Frontcourt

As most of you know, the Kings have two very big needs:  A Point Guard, and a Rotation Big that can help with defense and rebounding.  There is a 95% chance (Always give Petrie the 5%) that our Point Guard problem will be addressed with the #4 pick in the draft, so that leaves us with a few options to explore for getting our second need.

Star-divide

Coach Westphal recently said in an interview that getting help on the defensive end, and with rebounding were key to becoming a successful franchise.  More than likely, Geoff Petrie will heed his call in some way during this offseason, but how?

Option # 1: Draft

There's a few big men in the draft that would be able to help in the areas that we needed.  Hasheem Thabeet is probably the perfect solution as a rotation big that we need in this draft, but the only way we would get Thabeet is through the Number 4 pick, which we're supposed to look for a future star and leader of our team.  Thabeet, in my opinion would not be a crucial need or best player available pick.  So to me, Thabeet is out of the question.

Unfortunately, Gani Lawal would have fit our needs nicely and would probably have been available at the #23 pick, but he has withdrawn, so who else is there? DeJuan Blair will most likely go before the 23rd pick, but if he somehow fell, he'd be a steal at 23.  Earl Clark is also an option that could work, although he too would have to face a substantial drop to reach us at 23. Austin Daye has the potential to be a very good rebounder and shot blocker, but right now he is way too light to defend at the next level. In New Jersey he got mauled by Casspi, as SF from Europe no less.  Daye would be a project.  BJ Mullens has the size to be good at both, but he hasn't shown the skill to be a defensive threat and is only an average rebounder.  Tyler Hansbrough has the unique possibility of being an all-around good player, able to score and defend as well as rebound, but not be a master at any.  Jonas Jerebko probably has the best potential as a defensive/rebounding Power Forward in the draft, but he's sort of light right now, and has almost no offensive game.  He could be available at the 31st pick though.  Taj Gibson of USC also could be a solid pick as a rotation big.  Josh Heytvelt is a good rebounder, but might not be able to be too good of a defender at the next level. Jeff Pendergraph is mainly an offensive player, and Derrick Brown, while he has potential to be a good defender, is only an average rebounder in college.

The problem with picking such a player in the draft is that you shouldn't pick for need in the draft.  For example, if Ty Lawson somehow falls to #23, I don't see passing him up.  If Casspi falls to 31, theres also someone you can't pass up.  You try to grab the best player available in the draft.

Option #2: Free Agency

I've already detailed a post about the 2009 free agent class, and the best part about free agency is that you can use it to focus on your needs.  So since we're looking for a rotation big that can defend and rebound(being able to score is a plus but not as important), lets see who's available. Another thing we want to keep in mind is not to pick anyone too old.  We're a rebuilding team after all.

Unrestricted

1. Brandon Bass would be a great Rotation Big for us.  He's a bruiser, a little undersized, but he makes up for it with strenght and athleticism.  He's definitely due for a raise, after only making aboue 850K last year, but Dallas might not be able to afford to keep him.  

2. Chris Andersen has all the tools we need, but not the personality. He's in the perfect situation right now in Denver and I don't see him leaving unless he's vastly overpaid.

Restricted

1. Leon Powe backs up KG on the Celtics, and is probably the best all-around big in free agency, since he can defend, rebound, and score.  The problem with him is that he's just coming off of his 2nd knee surgery at the age of 25, and the Celtics also probably would match any offer.

2. David Lee is probably not going to be retained by the Knicks, so that they can focus on the summer of LeBron (stupid decision if thats what happens), but he will probably get paid a lot more than we can offer.  Also, we probably wouldn't start him, which he's not used to, and there are plenty of other teams that would. Don't see him coming to Sacramento, although he's one of the better rebounders in the league.

3. Marcin Gortat is seemingly the perfect answer to these needs, but he has a limited offensive game, is not that good fo a passer, and we would probably have to severely overpay to get him.  He'll probably end up being overpaid anyway, all based on his playoff performances.  But there are several other teams that can pay him more than we'd be willing to, and also offer him a starting job (Oklahoma City and New York to name a couple).

4. Ike Diogu. I like Ike.  And not just because of his 2 insane games at the end of the season.  He's always had the skill, he's just never been in the right situation.  He also would probably be rather cheap compared to the other restricted free agents, unless someone offers him way over his value.  He has good rebounding skills and a great wingspan.  We've seen what he can do, and I think he'd excel as a rotation big, as long as he got 20-25 minutes a night.

Option #3: Trades

Who would you focus on in a trade?  The Clippers are probably going to be shopping all their bigs this summer, excluding Griffin (yes I know that's not a completely forgone conclusion).  Kaman might fit in well. 

Another option is to nab Kyrylo Fesenko from the Jazz.  He's played well in limited time, and in the D-League.  We probably wouldn't have to give too much for him either, perhaps the 31st pick or next years 2nd rounder.

Other options include Josh Smith who's on the trading block apparently, although I don't think he'd be a good fit for the Kings, and would probably cost us Jason Thompson, as would most trades.  I'm just not ready to give him up, unless its an absolute slam dunk of a deal.

So what do you think? How should the Kings shore up the frontcourt? Vote and leave your reasoning in the comments below.

Poll
How should the Kings shore up their Frontcourt?
Draft
27 votes
Free Agency
75 votes
Trades
20 votes

122 votes | Poll has closed

(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)

Comment 59 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Sactown Royalty

Preview: Kings at Magic

Jan 2010 by Tom Ziller - 102 comments

Comments

Display:

I voted for Free Agency

because I don’t see the draft having anyone that would be able to provide the necessary impact at the defensive end and with rebounding right now. Getting a young Free Agent that could do the same, and has proven he can, would help us get better NOW.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement.

by Aykis16 on Jun 16, 2009 4:33 PM PDT reply actions  

And you like Ike.

Points about a young team that has pretty much been stripped to its primary parts yet doesn’t offer a starting 4 or 5 job weigh in that direction…or toward the draft. I’d just be surprised to get what we need from late in the first round. However, I thought Josh Heytvelt could be a surprisingly good pick even before he started getting press.

Lower their expectations and rise to met them

by left hand on Jun 16, 2009 4:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

We'll see what happens

This is going to be the most interesting drafts in a few years.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement.

by Aykis16 on Jun 16, 2009 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I voted Draft

Because I don’t like our chances in free agency with anyone other than Ike. I’d like Diogu a lot for his qualifying offer however and also think he’d be terrific behind JT, getting about 20 mpg. The reason I voted for draft though is because I really like Heytvelt at No. 31. I also wouldn’t mind Brown or Jerebko there either (though the latter hasn’t worked out for the Kings).

"geez its like this site is so serious i jus wanna git mai opinyons on tha Kings out there ok" - TZ

by sroufe on Jun 16, 2009 4:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Jerebko was at Treviso at least

Although I think he wimped out and didn’t play cause he was tired from the playoffs.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement.

by Aykis16 on Jun 16, 2009 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

True

but GP wasn’t there and there’s no chance he’s taking someone that he hasn’t seen in person. Jerebko apparently performed well in limited action in Treviso but that’s not enough. Hopefully he’ll still workout here but time is running out…

"geez its like this site is so serious i jus wanna git mai opinyons on tha Kings out there ok" - TZ

by sroufe on Jun 17, 2009 1:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

did you forget

that Ike played behind jt for the entire last season and we still only had 17 wins

by cwebbisboss1 on Jun 16, 2009 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not for nothing,

but we played 54 games before Diogu arrived.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 16, 2009 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

o ya

i forgot about that. but he still played together

by cwebbisboss1 on Jun 16, 2009 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Diogu

played in a total of 10 games under Natt and until the last two (when he exploded) he had only reached 20 minutes once. So, no, I didn’t forget…

"geez its like this site is so serious i jus wanna git mai opinyons on tha Kings out there ok" - TZ

by sroufe on Jun 17, 2009 1:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ike played in 10 games

and in only 4 of them did he double digits of playing time. If you look at those 4 games his production per minute was roughly the same. The 2 games where his numbers were highest he played almost 40 mins/game. That accounts for the huge numbers in those games, he played huge minutes. If I had the time it would be interesting to compare his per minute production against other PFs in the league.

by hozr on Jun 18, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

I voted Free Agency with almost the same thought process

but a different result. I think GP should bring back Ike and not entirely based on the last two games. In the last 2 games I saw Ike make some moves and score in a way that I don’t think JT will get to this year. A lot of his situation (failure to launch) has been caused by freak injuries and coaching changes that were out of his control. Bjax said he was the best big in practice beasting both JT and Shawes.

Regardless of what works out on draft night we are going to be leaving New York with 2 new rookies. At this point we have enough rookies for Coach Westphal to work train and work into his rotation and I would love to see Ike come back and do his thing in the frontcourt.

"We are in the business of kicking butt and business is very, very good." - Charles Barkley

by Bluejohn on Jun 17, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Have I missed any news on Diogu?

Anyone heard from Kings management in this regard? I’ve seen bits and pieces of the Maloof and Petrie pressers recently, but don’t remember any mention of Ike.

With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.

by otis29 on Jun 17, 2009 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think

that they’re going to need to rescind his rights, which will eliminate the cap hold on him. Then they can turn around and sign him if they like. I had read that GP “really liked him.”

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 17, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks section

There wasn’t any debate that the team would rescind his rights, from what I remember. The question was how much he would command on the open market?

With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.

by otis29 on Jun 17, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Very Little

He will quality as depth, albeit at a cheap price. Or, not at all. It’s gotta be one of the two.

Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 17, 2009 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I liked him as well.

Actually, I liked him ever since his GS days and I was really surprised he went to Indiana coz I thought he was supposed to be part of their core. But, as usual, I was mistaken.

There can only be one Noce!

by NoceOne on Jun 18, 2009 3:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wait a second

What two big men are we going to get that are better than David Lee?

by furious.d on Jun 16, 2009 5:46 PM PDT reply actions  

im guessing JT and Hawes

AB: Jeff Francoeur
Pitching: Any pitcher in MLB
Runners: Escobar at 3rd, Chipper at 2nd, McCann at 1st.

Pitch 1: In play, out(s)

by Scott Coleman on Jun 16, 2009 8:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's pretty hard to imagine

A guy who averages 16/12 on 55% shooting, and fills a role of great need (rebounding) not starting on one of the worst teams in the league. I love Shock and Hawes, but this would be a significantly better team with David Lee starting in either of their places.

by furious.d on Jun 17, 2009 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Uh no it wouldn't

David Lee isn’t that good.

Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jun 17, 2009 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pookey hates big strong men who rebound and sweat

I think its about some trauma left over over from highschool

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Jun 18, 2009 8:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Seriously?

You don’t think that David Lee is a better player right now than Spencer Hawes or Jason Thompson? My mind is boggled. I’m not saying the Kings should try to sign Lee, someone else will be willing to pay him too much. I’m just saying that if David Lee was on the Kings he would – without a doubt – be a starter.

by furious.d on Jun 18, 2009 8:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

I boggle with you f.d

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Jun 18, 2009 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Probably Lee

is better than JT and Hawes AT THE MOMENT.
But is he really worthy of the enormous contract that he’ll be signing this summer?(with the Knicks or whoever else) Definitively NO.

I also think Rondo is a superstar, but I don’t agree on giving a #4 choice and our brightest promise for him. Lee would be overpayed with the next contract, and it’s not a thing I’d like to see happens with him in a Kings uniform

"Even when I’m old and grey, I won’t be able to play it, but I’ll still love the game." — Michael Jordan

Go Kings!

by Panzerfaust on Jun 18, 2009 2:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Excellent point

Lee > Hawes, and Lee > JT.

But is $10 million Lee > than $2 million JT or $2 million Hawes?

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 18, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's the point.

Does Lee brings numbers 5 time better than JT or Spence?
In the actual economy I’d spend all those money only on a very very worth player, and Lee, though he’s a very good one, is not Melo or Bosh

"Even when I’m old and grey, I won’t be able to play it, but I’ll still love the game." — Michael Jordan

Go Kings!

by Panzerfaust on Jun 18, 2009 5:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 18, 2009 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I also said Draft

Ike’s probably the best deal we can get, and he should be a solid backup given the opportunity.

I have to say, as an aside to something you mentioned, Casspi would be a steal at 23. There’s no way I would wait for him to drop to 31. He’s shown that he can ball in the workouts against a lot of other top prospects.

by coachtheus on Jun 16, 2009 5:50 PM PDT reply actions  

I said free agency

I still think we should take a long look at Bass, even if we had to start him to convince him t sign with us he is just what we need and probably wouldn’t cost too much more than a MLE type deal.

If not him, just resign Ike and see what he can do.

by Big ZK on Jun 16, 2009 6:08 PM PDT reply actions  

I picked free agency

I would love to get Anderson. He provides solid defense and rebounding and a persona, that sells tickets. Did you see all the fans wearing his dew. He’s a marketing dream.

I realise thats not going to happen and I like Ike as well.

by nothingbutnet on Jun 16, 2009 6:17 PM PDT reply actions  

I voted trade

We have K9’s expiring, which should be good enough to get a decent big man.

We can put Beno on the block, depending on who we draft or pick up from summer league and/or training camp invitees.

We can option & trade Ike or McCants, both of whom should have some value to someone.

Somehow we should be able to take our “spare parts” and trade them for some help.

The draft lottery has reinforced my belief that there are not enough bad words in the English language.

by LeaguePassAddict on Jun 16, 2009 6:31 PM PDT reply actions  

You'd put Beno on the block?

Isn’t he too short? Wouldn’t they just shoot over him?

Wait a minute… you meant… never mind.

by hozr on Jun 18, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not THAT block

The trading block.

Maybe the chopping block.

The draft lottery has reinforced my belief that there are not enough bad words in the English language.

by LeaguePassAddict on Jun 18, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I understood you

I was making an attempt at humor… and not succeeding apparently.

by hozr on Jun 18, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

You succeeded

I was just being funny back.

The draft lottery has reinforced my belief that there are not enough bad words in the English language.

by LeaguePassAddict on Jun 18, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I voted free agency but feel you left a whole category of FA's off the list

The NBDL and Summer League undrafted – they are cheap, they are easy and will have short term commitments. I see that as as a combination that will make management, particularly the Maloof family, very pleased.

Remember, there are 8 roster slots now. Add 3 draft picks – probably. Then you can re-sign BJax. Then maybe Like Diogu. That is 12, roster minimum, but let’s add one more for safety’s sake. I am guessing that summer league will produce an Amundson, Justin Williams, or maybe an Anthony Morrow.

by betweentheeyes on Jun 16, 2009 9:14 PM PDT reply actions  

League minimum is 13, and can be fined if below the league average of around 14.

I read it in the FAQ about the CBA. Has to due with the players association wanting to have as many members employed as possible.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Jun 16, 2009 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

thanks for the correction HighTops

my bad. But I did advocate 13 and now 14, that is two roster spots open and as I belabor – a team that is hemorrhaging money and is eager to show you the wounds – who just spent a whopping $1.5M on their Head Coach (and it is money well spent it seems) – they are looking for bargains.

It was Bobby Brown last year. Keep you eyes peeled not just on the Kings roster but other box scores to see if anyone jumps up at you (Dontè Greene) during the Las Vegas summer league. That unknown may just be a King starting November 1st..

by betweentheeyes on Jun 16, 2009 9:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

The obscure I know intimately, the important is lost to me

I too voted FA. But, I don’t expect any get stars. I can see the Kings signing Calvin Booth again to backup Hawes, and Ike to backup JT. With Greene, Noc, & K9 filling out the bigs.

The draft will go PG, SF, & either PG or Big at 31 unless we trade the 31 to get Rubio. If Im right, BJax moves elsewhere. If there is any effort to bring in some big talent, it will be at the trade deadline when K9 & Noc’s contracts will be the most moveable.

So, I see the season starting with the currect 8 contracts, 2 or 3 draft picks, 2 vet big FA’s and possiblly one undrafted FA. The wildest thing I can see happening, is that the Kings give up the 31st pick to secure Rubio, and then they buy someone elses late teens pick to pick up a second PG.or Big. That leaves us under the cap and with talent & K9’s expiring come Feb., and the opportunity to get into the 2010 FA market early.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Jun 17, 2009 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought

BJax had said all along that he was retiring after last season. Is he planning to play another?

by furious.d on Jun 17, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

After the season that just ended

Bobby Jackson knows he holds value as a player and my guess he would be most comfortable staying a King. Unless he is offered significantly bigger money than the vet min (approx $1.1M ?) I would be surprised if he does not return.

He is beloved by the fans, the media, and the guy plays hard so I am confidant the coaching staff likes him.

Besides, if he stays here, won’t Dontè have to be his chauffer?

by betweentheeyes on Jun 17, 2009 10:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

BJax expressed a lot of frustration with losing

So I don’t know if he has the stomach for another season of huge losses. If he’s interested in coaching at Sac though, he needs to stay and develop a relationship with Westphal.

by hozr on Jun 18, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

If B-Jax still wants to really play,

he’ll find a contender willing to pay the league minimum for his services (boy, would he fit in Utah). If he is more focused on honing his coaching chops, he would probably prefer to stay closer to home.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 18, 2009 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Post scoring...

is also a huge need (despite Westphal not mentioning it).

In fact, no one seems to mention it, but we don’t have anyone right now that can score consistently with their back to the basket (sadly Ike is probably our best option).

Low post scoring is an essential element that gives balance to any offense. Pao and Kobe. Garnett and Pierce/Allen. Howard and Lewis/Turkoglu. Duncan and Ginobli/Parker, etc. It’s is not a coincidence that these teams are more successful.

Yes, we need interior defense and, yes, we need rebounding, but if we are going to spend money on a big in free agency or trade a core piece, we need to get someone that can score down low. That’s all. Rant over.

by R-Man on Jun 16, 2009 10:34 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

My preference

Is to move some pieces to draft Earl Clark. He can rebound and block shots, but surely isnt limited to those things.

If we cant then Taj Gibson is a more limited rebounder/shotblocker.

Jeff Pendergraph is not all that much of a shot blocker, but is probably an average rebounder for a PF, and he’ll probably be available late.

by DustyG on Jun 17, 2009 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind seeing

the Kings snag Josh Heyvelt with the 31, assuming they don’t deal it. He’s 6’11" with a 7’1" wingspan and he shot 40% from three last season. He could certainly do anything that Calvin Booth would do for us, and has the body and skills to potentially be a quality contributor. I’m sure he knows Hawes, as they both grew up in and went to college (briefly, in the case of Hawes) in Washington. But he’s more of a perimeter big, so he would be a good complement instead of a threat to or vote of no confidence in Spence.

He was well-regarded as an NBA prospect after his sophomore season, but really hurt his draft status by getting busted with drugs and sustaining an injury his junior year. Nevertheless, he came back to lead a talented Gonzaga team to a very good record in his senior season.

I think he’s exactly the right type of player to take a chance on in the second round. He’s got the size, he’s got the skills, he just needs strong coaching and a system that exploits his unique talents by fitting him into a tailor-made role.

by furious.d on Jun 17, 2009 1:41 PM PDT reply actions  

If he's still around at #31, and if we still have the pick.

But, wasn’t he here in one of the workouts, and wasn’t too impressive. Not that Booth was so impressive, but he does qualify for the Vets Min Exemption, if we go over the cap. What we don’t need is another outside shooting big.

Booth is a Vet and knows how to get inside and box out. We need defense and rebounding, more than we need another shooter with potential. Either way their going to be the 4th big, and aren’t going to see more than a few minutes per game barring foul trouble or injuries.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Jun 17, 2009 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

I voted Trade.

I think with Noce, Garcia, K9, Greene, Hawes and JT on the team, plus Ike and a possible big from the draft, that we can move two or three of these guys for a higher quality big. Maybe get Camby or Kaman for K9/Noce/player to be named after?

There can only be one Noce!

by NoceOne on Jun 18, 2009 3:07 AM PDT reply actions  

Ike!

Late bloomer that I am a big fan of.

The dude is gunna play hard with a team that signs him and shows that they want him. He was an absolute beast at ASU, yet has been tossed around the league as a consistent trade tool. He could indefinitely be a 12 and 8 guy if given the chance.

by SugaB on Jun 20, 2009 6:12 PM PDT reply actions  

If given the chance?

Like four teams hasn’t been a chance?

The draft lottery has reinforced my belief that there are not enough bad words in the English language.

by LeaguePassAddict on Jun 20, 2009 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed but....

He has unfortunately been used as a trade tool. What I mean is that the teams he has played for have liked his game, but he has unfortunately fallen into a trap where teams use his stock as trading for their needs. Its easier to trade away a player like Ike then commit to an undersized PF who lacks an outside jumper, and any sort of a face-up game.

by SugaB on Jun 21, 2009 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
A Learning Experience on Loyalty For Sacramento Via Golden State
Ko-017_small
#HereWeStay
Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration (UofL days)
Kings_sports_illustrated_small
Funny story
Small
As I sit here and watch the OKC Thunder come back against the Lakers
Waymantisdale-tz-150_small
the owners called down the thunder
Chief_petty_officer_small
Maturity in Sacramento Debacle
Small
Ryan Anderson to the Kings - Petrie's Gotta Give It A Thought
Chief_petty_officer_small
Open letter to the Maloofs
Small
Middle Ground on the Roster Situation

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G