Intrigue and Scandal and Such
My brain is mush. A horrible season has caused us to be evaluating prospects and talking about the draft since January. Frankly, I'm tired. This draft has more smokescreens than a John Woo movie. But still I'm going to try to make sense of it.
The Grizzlies are trying to puff their chest out and be a big player, saying they'll draft Ricky Rubio, but nobody is buying it. Chris Wallace is already a bit of a laughingstock, and he can't afford to end up with egg on his face again. Deep down, he knows he cannot go toe-to-toe with Fegan. And he knows he would have zero leverage if he drafted Rubio and tried to trade him. Wallace has made some dumb moves, but I have faith that he is smart enough to realize this (can't be that dumb, right? Right?). So the Grizzlies will not draft him.
The bigger question then becomes whether or not they trade the pick. Based on everything Amick has reported, it doesn't sound like the Kings are going to blink. They'll stay at 4 and get what they get. This is actually a much bigger deal than we've realized up until this point.
It is being widely reported that Memphis actually likes Tyreke Evans, and would like to draft him. But Wallace thinks he can trade down and still get him. There is no incentive for OKC to trade up, so you're looking at any team after Washington. It is possible that this could happen. But the catch is that if Rubio is off the board, it is very likely the Kings will draft Evans. This is why the Kings refusal to trade up is so key. Memphis can draft Evans, or they can trade their pick. They, in all likelyhood, cannot do both.
But there is yet another wrinkle. Do the Kings actually like Evans that much? Personally, I think they actually do. But it could just be the single greatest smokescreen misdirection ever pulled.
Have I clarified the situation? Yeah, I didn't think so. Is it Thursday yet?
0 recs |
204 comments
|
Comments
But it's so simple!
All I have to do is divine from what I know of you: are you the sort of man who would put the poison into his own goblet or his enemy’s? Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me.
by smgmatt on Jun 22, 2009 11:02 AM PDT reply actions 3 recs
Here we go again......
But the statement is still classic no matter how many times it is said.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm smelling a worst case scenario with
Rubio and Evans off the board by pick 4
by KingsForLife on Jun 22, 2009 11:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Both of them?
How? Does OKC have interest in Evans?
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Jun 22, 2009 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
memphis takes evans, OKC takes rubio
by KingsForLife on Jun 22, 2009 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
which would be the biggest disappointment of all time
by KingsForLife on Jun 22, 2009 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't worry, be happy.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement.
by Aykis16 on Jun 22, 2009 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curry might be a nice consolation prize though
Jennings as well.
by kingsfan300 on Jun 22, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jennings isn't coming here.
The draft lottery has reinforced my belief that there are not enough bad words in the English language.
by LeaguePassAddict on Jun 22, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
After reading that quote in Hoopsworld regarding the tests
I agree with you.
by kingsfan300 on Jun 22, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Princeton Petrie and Coachie
would love a guy that Christmas trees’ tests. I could feel their heads shaking from here.
by betweentheeyes on Jun 22, 2009 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At that point...
I’d go with Thabeet.
Rubio, Evans, Thabeet, Flynn, Holiday, Jennings. That’s my order.
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thabeets not coming here unless we see him.
And I don’t think Memphis AND OKC pass him up when he’s the best player available in this draft at the position they need.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement.
by Aykis16 on Jun 22, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Definitely agree.
"El once, chico. Eleven."
by Juan Primo on Jun 22, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope Thabust is not coming here
even if he is on the steps of ARCO Arena as we speak
by betweentheeyes on Jun 22, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh boy
So the Kings select Hasheem Thabeet!! Oh joy.
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No way they draft someone they haven't shown the least bit interest in
JT was a surprise last year but we had him come in twice. Thabeet hasn’t even come to Sacramento. I think he’s only been interviewed.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement.
by Aykis16 on Jun 22, 2009 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hasheet is coming in for workout
Isnt’ he? I thought I heard that somewhere. Did it get cancelled?
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They said he was suppose to be here yesterday
but it must have been a mistake, because he was scheduled for Memphis yesterday and ended up blowing them off
by ElRonToro on Jun 22, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pick him and deal him
There’d be quite a bit of interest in 7-3, I think.
Los Reyes de Sacramento son brutales!
by ttylerbballcamper on Jun 22, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not GP's style
Petrie drafts who he wants on the team, regardless of “perceived” value. Look no further than Thompson, Jason.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Jun 22, 2009 1:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, but..
The fourth pick might be a bit more valuable than the twelfth.
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Jun 22, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn't believe it
That’s a very bad fallacy. If Memphis has problems trading down, so will Sacramento.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How's it a fallacy?
The chances of a highly desired player (Thabeet, Rubio, even Harden) being around is much higher at #4 than at #12.
I never said that the Kings would trade down—just that Petrie had even less incentive to do so at #12, since the return there wouldn’t be worth possibly losing the player he really wanted, who was getting looks by at least one team that drafted soon after Sacramento.
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Jun 22, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Relax calm down (it wasn't a personal criticism)
If the draft pick was that valuable, the Kings would have to get a ton in return to give it away. I also think we would know whom the Kings would take and you wouldn’t have all this indecision.
One of the things that some people are missing about this draft is that if the #2 pick has similar value as the 6th pick, it’s going to be hard to trade down and make it worth your while.
So if that’s true of Memphis and the 2nd pick, that logic has to at least apply to OKC and Sacramento as well.
I think it’s all posturing myself because I think either Memphis takes Rubio (and trades him), or they take Thabeet. But, that’s me.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
It’s not Petrie’s style to try to trade down. That’s a given. But if the Kings’ top two choices are both gone at #4, but another team really wanted whomever was left on the board (Thabeet, etc.) to the point that they could blow the Kings away with an offer, I could see Petrie making a deal. Especially if he was still able to pick one of his top remaining one or two players.
I’m not naming specific teams or deals—I’m just saying that, while it’s not Geoff’s style to trade on draft day, he’s not too set in his ways to turn down a great deal. I believe that he hasn’t traded picks because he assessed the risk and decided it wasn’t worth it, and not because he’s so arrogantly set on doing things his way. Petrie understands his moves better than anybody else. It’s probable that nobody was banging down his door for pick #12 last year, so he went with JT.
The fact that #4 may not be much more valuable than #6 is a moot point. All it means is that team #6 probably won’t try to trade up to #4. I’m merely saying that Petrie would (and should) be open to the possibility of trading if the other team is motivated enough to offer superior value in return—not that Petrie will actively try to seek a trade.
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Jun 22, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I understand all your points
But, your last paragraph reiterates my point perfectly. Why bother if you’re that team at 6 (Minnesota in this case)?
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're missing my point
My initial point was in reply to Exhibit G’s post, which stated:
Not GP’s style
Petrie drafts who he wants on the team, regardless of "perceived" value. Look no further than Thompson, Jason
ExG said that Petrie wouldn’t make a move, since it’s not his style. He’ll draft who he wants, not who he thinks other teams will want. He cited Thompson at 12 as an example.
My reply merely stated that the circumstances surrounding a #4 pick are different than those of a #12. My only point was that more highly desired talent is available at #4 than at #12. Which could, hypothetically, change things. I’m not saying that it will. There’s nothing wrong with what I said, as far as I can see. You’re arguing something that nobody is disagreeing with, all the while throwing around terms like “very bad fallacy”, which add nothing to the discussion but a tone of condescension.
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Jun 22, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with G
Because Petrie has that history. I think your point is true, but not really applicable here.
After all, if the Kings have the 4th overall pick, and believe Rubio and Flynn are their best 2 prospects, they will absolutely have a chance at one or the other. So trading down has absolutely no advantage either unless they want to risk not getting Flynn to save a little money (which may happen for that reason—but I doubt it).
To address your point just below, I do think we agree on just about everything else.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You mean Rubio and Evans
:-)
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't want any part of Evans
even if he happens to the BPA (which I think is totally pointless in this draft).
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know
I’m screwing with ya.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know you know I know you know
Fucker.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I mostly agree
I think it’s a moot point, too, since the Kings will most likely be able to draft their guy (Rubio or their #2, be it Evans or Flynn). But my original point was really aside from all that: GP picking JT last year isn’t the best example of what he will do at #4, because #12 and #4 are not very comparable.
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Jun 22, 2009 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes but you're missing my point too Leroy
Which is that the 2009 draft and 2008 draft aren’t comparable.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This one is more fun!
and nerve wracking..
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, they're definitely not comparable
I haven’t missed that. :)
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Jun 22, 2009 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cool
No need to further pontificate my point. LOL
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Glad we see eye to eye
Rather than eye for an eye
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Jun 22, 2009 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let me clarify again
I think I see where a lot of the confusion is coming from, and I should have been more clear from the beginning.
I wasn’t agreeing with ttylerbballcamper—I wasn’t saying GP would take Thabeet to trade him. I was more picking at the choice of JT as evidence. It seems like a good choice, since it illustrates that GP will take who he wants. But truthfully, he could’ve chosen just about any GP player in the past (except maybe Spencer). Truth is, GP hasn’t drafted this high, and so we don’t know exactly how everything will play out. Most likely he’ll have one of his top two choices to draft, and he’ll take him.
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Jun 22, 2009 6:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with all of that
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 6:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Furthemore
I think, as far as I can tell, that we agree on most points, anyway.
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Jun 22, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Evans and Rubio are gone...
…we take James Harden and trade down. That’s not a WORST case scenario, as I think Toronto would pay handsomely for the rights to Harden.
harden/Udrih for Flynn/Capspace+future pick?
by Smills91 on Jun 22, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Never happen.
OKC will take Thabeet before Rubio.
by nothingbutnet on Jun 22, 2009 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If this is truly the case Ex-to-the-G
then the Petrie/Levien combo may be a deadly one and gives me a lot of hope for our team’s future
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Jun 22, 2009 11:06 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This whole thing has been manipulated by one man
His name, is Kaiser Soze.
by misterbrister on Jun 22, 2009 11:07 AM PDT reply actions 7 recs
Here's a Big What If...
I don’t even know if this is something that could happen, but I figured I’d throw it out there. What If…
What if Memphis drafts Rubio at #2 and the Kings draft Evans at #4. Then the Kings sell #31 for cash and trade Evans and some of that cash to the Grizz for Rubio?
by #12Pick...who? on Jun 22, 2009 11:12 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Definitely Possible
And there might not even be much need for cash thrown in . . . getting Evans at the #4 salary-scale instead of #2 still saves them some cash, and that’s happened before as well.
by smgmatt on Jun 22, 2009 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Memphis really wants to save money
then they might as well just for the the K9/#4 for Jaric/#2 swap
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Jun 22, 2009 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We shouldn't have to do K9 for Jaric
That costs us money in the long term and we can probably get a better deal by February. Why have two point guards who aren’t very good and have bad contracts?
Father of the "Natt this!" movement.
by Aykis16 on Jun 22, 2009 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's only a year longer
and we don’t lose any major pieces
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Jun 22, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No way
Memphis drafts Rubio? Good for them, we draft Evans or Flynn.
The Grizzlies are not going to get nothing for their idiocy.
"Even when I’m old and grey, I won’t be able to play it, but I’ll still love the game." — Michael Jordan
Go Kings!
by Panzerfaust on Jun 22, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
also
this is another good scenario where rubio could potentially make it to sacramento. A swap with OKC is unlikely and if Rubio is there at 3, they’ll probably take him
by KingsForLife on Jun 22, 2009 11:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Great stuff G (damn standards & shit)
But, I think you identified the real problem Memphis has. Memphis can’t trade down to Minnesota to get Evans because it’s very likely that Washington will take him. If Sacramento doesn’t.
I think life would be much simpler if Memphis and Sacramento just agreed to swap Rubio & Evans. Memphis fans would argue Memphis got screwed, but the reality is that Memphis is screwed if they take Rubio or Evans. At least Evans fits with the players Memphis has already.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 11:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Memphis fans
you mean all two of ’em?
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Jun 22, 2009 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Plus 3 shades of Blue
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Those were the two I was talking about
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Jun 22, 2009 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL ouch
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Evans wants Evans?
So they must not be too high on Conley because I don’t think Evans is coming in to replace Mayo.
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 11:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
^^Memphis wants Evans?^^
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Draft intruige
I think the Kings have been having players back in for second and third visits, whats changed is there position in the draft in the past noone knew who Jason Thompson was. Now they have more players to choose from
by Murf on Jun 22, 2009 11:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
This is all gamesmanship on the part of Petrie. Evans is most likely a Shooting Guard, his assist to trunover ratio last year was essentially even. He is a slashing 2 Guard who is an above average passer for his position, but no way do you want this guy carrying the load for you at the Point. That was the consensus and rightfully so of the guy before these workouts started happening where Evans joined the PG’s in Minnesota. Of course he is physically dominating the workouts against Flynn, Curry, Lawson, Holliday and Jennings, he is bigger and stronger with a decisive advantage in wingspan. 6’11.25" versus 6’7" for Holliday and 6"4’ and under for everybody else. Evans is a 2 guard.
Evans doesn’t fit on the Kings with Kevin Martin and isn’t a great fit on Washington as they are looking for a shooter at the 2. I think Petrie knows that Memphis could likely get Evans at 6, he doesn’t have the assets to trade up to #2, Rubio is a great fit for his young roster and most of his weapons need a shot creator, so he drives up Evans value to make the Grizz shy away from trading back to #6, and is banking on the fact they and OKC won’t pick Rubio.
David Kahn in Minnesota screwed this thing up when he allowed Evans to join the Point Guard Workout and Petrie continued it by having Evans workout with a similar point guard group immediately after. Rubio has to be the guy the Kings like, and are doing everything they can to get him to fall to them.
by Ebomb on Jun 22, 2009 11:54 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Just curious though
If Petrie & Co. feel Evans is the best player in the draft, and (in their opinion) will be the best professional basketball player to come out of this draft – don’t you pick him regardless of the position he plays?
This team needs an infusion of talent – I’m not sure that not picking Evans or trading his draft rights is the best idea if he is indeed the best player. I’d say you draft him, get him into the mix and worry about positions/logjams later.
And if Evans is strictly a two guard, shouldn’t those pure point guards be able to handle him with their quickness on the offensive end?
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent Points
If you think Evans is one of 1-3 prospects out of each draft that is a star type player, than yes, you would have to take him. But the concerns about Evans still are true.
If Evans blossoms into a guy that is a penetrator at the 2 who can make good passes, and is an average shooter, but turns it over too much as your lead ball handler, playing him in the backcourt with Kevin Martin wouldn’t be ideal. So you’d have to get rid of either him or martin. You have needs for a Point Guard now. None of these guys are sure things, and guessing who the star is going to be is difficult. If both he and Stephen Curry both have a 20% chance of becoming a star type player, don’t you have to take the guy at the position of need for your ball club, rather than trying to create 2 similar players at the 2 guard position?
In regards to the workouts, I don’t think Evans was credited with stopping them, at least that hasn’t been a part of any of the workout reports I’ve read. Just continue to hear the “man against boys” quote from both the Sac and Min workouts.
I just don’t think Evans is a great fit in Sacramento, and before these workouts, most people were unconvinced that he had a greater chance to become a star over Flynn and Curry because of his wretched shot and shooting statistics, inefficiency playing the point with high turnovers, and lack of ideal athleticism as measured in the combine to defend athletic 2’s. You may be right, my opinion is that this is a clear smokescreen.
by Ebomb on Jun 22, 2009 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well put
I heard something along these lines the other day. I’m trying to remember for sure, but I think it was Bill Simmons. He was talking about how we place so much importance on “assigned position” rather than just putting the 5 best players on the floor. It’s a thought I agree with. You put your best 5 players on the floor and find ways to make that lineup successful.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Jun 22, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a good point about the 5 best players on the floor
I need to address than and ’Reke immediately.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But
Your point guard has to shoot better than 27% from three and not have an ugly looking shot right? Well, an ugly shot is fine if your name is Kevin Martin and it’s going in, but not if you are a point guard and it’s not going in. No point guards have made it in the NBA with a weak 3-pt shot.
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kidd, Jason
Worked out pretty well for him.
Oh, well. Rajon Rondo won a ring last year.
Just to name two pg who are actually in the league.
"Even when I’m old and grey, I won’t be able to play it, but I’ll still love the game." — Michael Jordan
Go Kings!
by Panzerfaust on Jun 22, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But that's only two
and no great NBA shooting guards shoot poorly from three right?
Hmm, maybe Evans is a bust…
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dwyane Wade
Parker can’t shoot. Payton wasn’t a great shooter. The list can go on for days.
by Ziller on Jun 22, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But
TZ, I am hearing a lot of talk that Evans can’t shoot so he can’t be a star. Most of the players mentioned above are point guards that put up over 8 assists a night. Maybe Evans IS going to be a bust?
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So ignore it dalt
I don’t want Evans, but it has nothing to do with his shooting. If that was really the criteria here, why would I be so hot to trot over Rubio?
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the dude shaved his head
the Pookeyguru love affair would be over
by BrooklynFan on Jun 22, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I shave my head
So, love affair so not anything to do with shaved head or not.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is that alliteration?
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just laugh
We all have our favorite players in this draft, but I am not going to dismiss any player just because they aren’t my pick.
By the way Pookey, you say your pick is Rubio but what if he’s off the board at #4?
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I bet it's Jennings
"Greed is the inventor of injustice as well as the current enforcer." - Julian Casablancas
by submison on Jun 22, 2009 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I think the scenario has to be that Evans talent clearly exceeds the other players the Kings have worked out. Otherwise, all bets are off.
If you say Rubio/Evans/Jennings/Flynn/Holliday/Curry are fairly equal in overall talent, then your existing roster deficiencies become a larger factor in determining the actual pick.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Which is exactly why I've dumped Evans to the wayside Otis
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Question
What if the reports are true that Evans was like a “man against boys” against the other top point guard prospects?
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is a tough question
You can’t just dismiss the question of whether Evans can play the point in the NBA as unimportant. If Evans is able to play the one, he might well be the best player coming out of this year’s draft. That’s still possible if he’s a two guard, but working him out against a group of smaller point guards isn’t going to help you make that determination (IMO).
It does make the whole Evans thing extremely tricky. You need to pick the best player available, but how can you be sure of that when you appear to be pigeonholing your pick to the point guard position?
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
exect for your point about Evans working out against a group of smaller point guards. Calathes (6’5") and Curry (6’3") are not “small” point guards. If Evans is going to be playing the point guard position for the Kings, than those are the players he will be going up against = smaller point guards.
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's what I've thinking all day
Everyone keeps complaining that Evans worked out against smaller point guards, but those are exactly the same PGs or the height of the PGs he’s gonna go against nigth in and night out. Evans could be a matchup nightmare.
Yes, he has his limitation when it comes to shooting and handles (the most important to me) but the fact that he abuses smaller point guards shouldn’t be a problem, it should be an advantage.
by eduardo_m7 on Jun 22, 2009 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Handles
I think he has much better handles than people think. The problem is that he forces the issue too much. Similar to the way Salmons was when he first got here. Salmons impoved a lot last year with that. I think Evans can improve as well…
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Evans also isn't 28 years old
and been in the league for a while. He’s got lots of upside.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement.
by Aykis16 on Jun 22, 2009 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the bigger problem is defense
He might be able to beat points off the dribble, but is he going to score more than he’s going to give up?
He’s not that quick for a 6’5" guard, let alone for a point guard. I also question whether he’s viable bringing up the ball against pressure.
Basically I agree with John Hollinger:
I rated him strictly as a wing. I’m always highly suspicious of 6-5 or 6-6 guys who have “point guard skills” actually playing the point — usually they’re either too slow to defend opposing PGs or can’t push it up fast enough to get transition points and they end up playing their whole career at the 2.
by nbrans on Jun 22, 2009 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can understand that
I just don’t like the point everyone makes about him working out with smaller PGs like he was taking advantage of them. If he is going to play PG in the NBA (whether we or everyone around agrees or not) he is going to have an advantage on the offensive end and that’s a good thing.
Now, on the defensive end is another story. I haven’t see enough on that end to make an educated argument so maybe you can all help out. I did think that his reach (what most people rave about) would help him on that end. If he stands taller than most PGs wouldn’t that help in the perimeter by denying the ball and at the rim by maybe blocking the ball from behind? He also seems to be physical enough to handle his own there…
by eduardo_m7 on Jun 22, 2009 7:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, one more point on the drills
A 1×1 or 3×3 setting kind of enhances Evans’ strengths because it’s easier to muscle through guys. In a 5×5 setting where the lane is filled it’s not quite as easy to just brush past your guy and get to the hoop. But really, Evans strength is his craftiness with the ball.
As for the defense, I didn’t think he was particularly good at Memphis. He’s not really physically quick, even though he’s a good penetrator.
by nbrans on Jun 22, 2009 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crafty he is
and as much as I DO worry about him being a PG he could develop certain skills (not all) that could help him succed at the position. He certainly as a lot of tools to work with.
I have a lot of reservations but he strikes me as a player who could turn into a star in this league. Maybe not a superstar, but a very solid contributor on a team. I see bigger upside than a lot of players we are discussing
by eduardo_m7 on Jun 22, 2009 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I think the appealing thing about Evans
Is that the Kings could draft him and he could play some time at the PG even if the SG is (I still think) his natural long term position. Then they could see how he develops and either trade him or Martin depending on who is looking better as a SG of the future. But at least in the meantime Evans can put in some time at the 1/2, and if he works out at the PG spot that’s great.
That’s one reason I wouldn’t be upset if the Kings drafted Evans as a BPA as opposed to say Harden, who is only going to get 8 minutes a night backing up Martin because he definitely can’t play PG.
by nbrans on Jun 22, 2009 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Personally
I would feel much better about this strategy if Lawson were realistically in play for the #23 pick . . . but since they didn’t even work him out they’ll likely pass even if he’s still available.
It would be a shame not to get at least one full-time PG out of a very PG-heavy draft.
This is obviously assuming Evans does not play PG full-time, since that’s what you’re talking about.
by smgmatt on Jun 22, 2009 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Evans beating up on little PG's isn't a problem
it just doesn’t mean anything – It’s what a bigger player is supposed to do in situations like that. Stick any decent shooting guard in with those PG’s, and he’d dominate 1-on-1 and 3-on-3 drills.
And it’s not going to be an advantage in the NBA, because he is going to be matched up with shooting guards, which will be a fair fight.
by Charlieb on Jun 22, 2009 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, let's assume
The Kings draft him, he’s playing point guard, again, whether everyone likes it or not. How is he getting matched up with shooting guards?? On offense?? On defense??
If the other team’s shooting guard is guarding Evans then who guards Kevin?? The other team’s PG. This situation = matchup problem.
If Evans is just uarded by the other teams PG, he will most likely be taller and longer, and hopefully able to abuse him. This situation = matchup problem.
by eduardo_m7 on Jun 22, 2009 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Evans might start out at PG, but he'll never be the PG on a quality team
He might play PG with the Kings briefly until they can find a real PG (at which time they would probably have to decide between trading either Kevin or Tyreke), but eventually, he’ll slide over to his natural position, shooting guard. He will spend most of his career guarding shooting guards.
All my doubts about Evans playing the point have to do with his ability to run an NBA offense and distribute the ball efficiently. Being able to handle a PG in a one-on-one matchup was never a question – any semi-athletic shooting guard can do that. The reason teams play a PG instead of 2 SG’s, despite the fact that SG’s have obvious matchup advantages against smaller players, is that having a PG that can efficiently run an offense can have a hugely positive impact on a team. My doubts about Evans are all because I don’t think he can efficiently run an offense and distribute the ball well enough to play PG in the NBA (refer to his A:TO ratio).
All these workouts did was confirm what we already knew (he can beat up smaller players – whoopee), while doing nothing to dispel any of the doubts. How that moves him up anybody’s draft board is beyond me.
by Charlieb on Jun 23, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Evans beat up on smaller players
You seem to see that as a negative. I can see not putting much stock from his workouts because of that, but I get the idea you see it as a disqualifier.
Which makes no sense to me.
Even if Evans ends up being a two guard in this league, he may well still be the best player to come out of this draft. If Petrie feels that’s the case, he should take him.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 23, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think it's a negative
I just don’t think it matters at all either way. He just did what everyone should have expected. Nothing more, nothing less.
Evans might be a great 2-guard some day, but the Kings desperately need a point guard, and there are some good ones in this draft. If Petrie drafts anybody other than a point guard, then he better be pretty damn convinced he’s the best player.
by Charlieb on Jun 23, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unless he gets his point guard at #23
I’d rather he spend the #4 on the best player available. This team needs to stockpile talent, not try to fill needs.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 23, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think there is a "best player available"
Everyone is a gamble, and there are a few players of equivalent talent. Since there’s no sure thing, why not gamble on a player that at least plays the position you need?
by Charlieb on Jun 23, 2009 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Petrie feels that way
I agree with you. I’m not so sure they are all equivalent though.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 23, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just a quick point
Tyreke does have a 6’11" wingspan. Makes up for getting beat more than some might think. Also, because of his length, he can back off his man a bit and still get up the block or challenge a shot.
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What I wanted to say
only you said it much much better. Thanks Dalt
by eduardo_m7 on Jun 22, 2009 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could care less if my PG 'pushes the ball up the floor'...
…I wanna see him PASS the ball up the floor. It’s the fastest and most effective way to advance the ball, not to mention the fundamentally SOUND and CORRECT way to PUSH the ball in transition.
by Smills91 on Jun 22, 2009 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tyreke Evans as a 2 guard
The Kings were 17-65 this year.
In my opinion, If Rubio is off the board and Tyreke is available at #4, you take him. Period. I don’t care if he is a “tweener” guard or mosly a shooting guard, the Kings need to take him. You don’t take a good player like Jonny Flynn and HOPE he becomes a star. You also don’t take Curry who has the same issues as Evans but is smaller and a worse defender. Evans has star potential.
As far a his 1.08 assist/turnover rate. Dwyane Wade’s a/t rate as a freshman was 1.15. Brandon Roy’s a/t rate as a freshman was 0.70 and as a sophomore was 1.21. When you can possibly get a player of that caliber of potential, you take him. Memphis got better as he was moved into the point guard role this year. He is no Ricky Rubio, but he’s no OJ Mayo either. Evans averaged 2 more assists that OJ did in college and OJ dished out 3.2 assists this year.
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Neither Wade nor Roy plays the point
Chalmers and Quinn/Steve Blake, Rodriguez play point for those teams.
by discocricket on Jun 22, 2009 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The point was that
both players are more than capable of playing the point guard position. Wade pretty much does do that while Chalmers/Quinn shoot off the ball.
"Greed is the inventor of injustice as well as the current enforcer." - Julian Casablancas
by submison on Jun 22, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do those guys usually guard the other teams SG or PG?
Cause Martin probably shouldn’t be guarding PGs.
by discocricket on Jun 22, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Roy and Wade are both bigger than their point guard teammates
so defending shooting guards is what they do.
I agree with Martin not guarding point guards, but unless we draft Harden that won’t happen.
"Greed is the inventor of injustice as well as the current enforcer." - Julian Casablancas
by submison on Jun 22, 2009 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Further
Roy’s freshman rate you quote he only played 13 games that season an average 15 Minutes, those stats are worthless, and as said below, Wade and Roy don’t play the point, and both of them perofrmed better than Evans in college as far as A/TO, and both shot better.
by Ebomb on Jun 22, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
So who is your pick if Rubio is off the board?
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curry
He’s the second best point in the draft, I think the Kings need to improve their defense, but defense at the point isn’t the place to start, Curry is the best shooter, and underrated passer, his agility and bench press numbers tell me he is a better athlete and stronger than the perception for him. People compare him to Bibby, I think his ceiling is higher.
by Ebomb on Jun 22, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Defense improves with made shots
it’s the missed shots leading to fast breaks that kill you. I like Curry as #4. Defensively with Martin it looks pretty ugly, but pick up a defensive minded SF and things change quickly. I think JT will only get better defensively – especially if he stops the foul trouble. It is up to Spencer to improve defensively. if he does, big if, then a Curry/Martin back court can bring a lot of worry to teams night after night. Defensive rebounds are the key and this team would be very exciting to watch.
by STH114 on Jun 22, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's a combo guard
He has little driving ability and is mostly a shooter. His assist/turnover rate as a Junior this year was a below average 1.50.
I like Curry a LOT but if you are going to dismiss Evans for one weakness than you have to do the same with Curry. My point is that there are NO sure things in this draft. To dismiss a player based on a year in college is valid but should than be valid for every other player.
But, with all that said, the Kings have to pick somebody and I would be happy with Evans or Curry. I just think Evans gets a bad rap from some people because he shot less than 30% from 3-pt range as a freshman in college.
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
by dalt99 on Jun 22, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you dismiss Curry too quickly as a combo guard
Yeah his A/TO was 1.50, Evans was 1, however that davidson team was putrid he played on. I saw several highlight clips containing his passes where his players just couldn’t finish even though set up perfectly. Clearly it’s not certain he can play the point, I just think chances are he can.
by Ebomb on Jun 22, 2009 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And what I have seen of Curry
he is more than ready for NBA life. He grew up in professional basketball… i see more star potential in him than any other mentioned – purely speaking from who can handle being a star. This kid is well anchored, which leads me to believe he will develop faster than your normal rookie who will get lost in the bright lights.
by STH114 on Jun 22, 2009 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Similarly
His team may have been putrid, but he was facing lesser competition as well (Davidson’s strength of schedule was pretty low). Those factors may not balance out, but you might need to consider both.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curry's assist/turnover rate
I think you also have to take into account that he was double and triple teamed almost every time down the floor, which led to more turnovers. That’s not going to happen in the NBA, if anything his game would benefit in the NBA even more because the floor is more spread and he will have room to operate.
I watched Curry quite a bit this season and he was a different player than his first two seasons. He really looked like a true point guard, not just a capable passer but a creative passer. Because of that I think he’ll be a very good offensive player if he can be freed from his man in a pick & roll (I don’t think he’s quick enough to beat anyone off the dribble), and as a true point guard.
But even if his ceiling is higher than Bibby’s he brings the same limitations — you basically have to design your offense around him to free him for shots (just as Bibby suffered when they stopped running the offense through Brad in the high post and let Bibby run off of him), and defensively you get killed every single night.
I like Curry, but I’ve seen enough of that for a while.
by nbrans on Jun 22, 2009 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Understandable
With the success rate of draft picks, if you can get a guy with as productive of a career as Mike Bibby has had at #4, that’s a good pick, even if you don’t necessarily want to watch his game.
by Ebomb on Jun 22, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I disagree...
…that Evans is purely a 2 guard. He’s a COMBO guard in the mold of Dwayne Wade. I would rather grab Evans at 4 and perhaps look for a TRUE PG at 23, a la Maynor, Lawson, Mills, or even Collison. At LEAST one of them would be available.
Evans has TOO much upside and pure talent NOW to pass on at 4 IMO. I say take him and have a 3 guard rotation of Martin/Evans and whoever we land at #23. Evans can handle the one enough to play 20 some odd minutes there a night.
by Smills91 on Jun 22, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm worn out with this
I think I’ve read Rubios more in my life than C-Webbs. I’m tired. Who has got the good stuff to get me thru this and do I get a King’s fan discount?
by ElRonToro on Jun 22, 2009 12:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Read my post
Dont Worry, Be Happy.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement.
by Aykis16 on Jun 22, 2009 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
no trades
stay with 4… draft evans or flynn!!!!
by silverguy on Jun 22, 2009 12:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Kings Need Everything
Take the best player available. The Kings backcourt has been inconsistent and injured. The small forward position has been a revolving door. The bigs are promising, but young. Dept is an issue across the board. A PG can be obtained via trade or free agency, as a short term or long term option.
You take the best player, period. Yes, if you have a shooting guard and a point guard rated about the same, maybe you go with the need at that point. Otherwise, best player. We don’t need another ‘pass over Paul Pierce because Jason Williams fits a bigger need’ draft.
by PurplePurple on Jun 22, 2009 12:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Just out of curiousity
What time is the first pick made? I know the Draft Preview is at 4:00 with the actual draft at 4:30. Will the 1st pick be made immediately at 4:35?
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Jun 22, 2009 12:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I checked last year's draft thread
It looks like the first pick occurred around 4:40pm Pacific.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
All this talk of drafting PGs
…But take the scenario that Thabeet drops to the Kings. What then? Griz draft Rubio, OKC drafts Harden, what do the Kings do? Draft him or a PG?
IMHO, I say that we should take Thabeet, then trade off Hawes to somewhere like Memphis for their PG they just replaced…Mike Conley. Everybody wins.
by CloudyEyes on Jun 22, 2009 1:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Or...dare I say it?
Nick Calathes at #31 or 23?
by CloudyEyes on Jun 22, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At this point, if Rubio's gone at 4
I trade down to #6 or #7 to get Flynn and maybe another piece
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Jun 22, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That wont' happen
The 4th overall pick isn’t that valuable, and I don’t think any team believes the Kings really want Evans.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone getting together at a sports bar or something for the draft?
Could be fun to get a bunch of StR’ers together for the draft.
We can all collectively groan as we take Thabeet or Jenkins McSquirt.
Or cheer wildly as we select Rubio or Evans.
Or shrug semi-pleased as Curry or Flynn come our way.
Or cry uncontrollably as MEM trades their pick to MIN or NY to select Rubio, at which point OKC goes w/ Harden or Thabeet, at which point the Kings frantically to trade down and settle on selling the #4 pick & K9 plus Beno for “cash considerations.”
I am remaining fairly pessimistic, based on recent events.
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2009 1:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I forgot the good news...
We use the cash from the above deal to acquire Camby from the Clips, lure Ostertag out of retirement, and buy Colleen Maloof a fifth of JD and some Percoset.
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why are you pessimistic?
Rubio is at Kings practice facility right now converting all the non-believers. This is a good day.
by bench_blob on Jun 22, 2009 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
StR Draft Thread
You don’t want to miss it. Last year’s was epic. I can only imagine what this year’s will be like….
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Jun 22, 2009 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
StR would explode if we passed on Rubio...
and not in the good way, in the Osama Bin Laden way.
There now I've met the 75 word count. -pookeyguru
by moproblemz on Jun 22, 2009 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I'm really going to love the 100 fuck's if that happen
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
"I'm really going to love the 100 fucks"
Sounds good in theory, but in practice you end up a bit sore.
Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott
by Kfan in Korea on Jun 22, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
You don't achieve legendary status without some sacrifice...
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2009 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sactown Royalty Defcon Ratings on Draft Night
Kings keep #4, draft Rubio – Defcon 1
Kings keep #4, draft Evans – Defcon 2
Kings keep #4, draft Flynn – Defcon 2
Kings trade JT & #4 for #2 pick – Defcon 3
Kings pick Hasheem Thabeet anywhere in draft – Defcon 4
Kings trade all first round picks for cash – Defcon 5
Rubio is available at the #4 but the Kings pass him up – Defcon ∞
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Kings trade all first round picks for cash – Defcon 5
STR might be calm, but after we work out the details Natomas would be under siege. In fact, after David Stern announces the cash buy out trades he might as well announce the Maloofs have signed a 20 year lease with Anaheim effective immediately.
by bignerd on Jun 22, 2009 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Suspense is killing me
Taking the kids to the draft party at arco, but it might be more fun to hang on STR.
by STH114 on Jun 22, 2009 3:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Memphis Fan Here.......
Being a friend of TZ’s, this is where I come for my Kings news and fan opinions…..
I don’t think you guys are being too fair to memphis…..
We know what it is like to have the worst record in the league and get the 4th pick….it happened to us in 06 during the Oden/Durant draft, which sorta turned into the Oden/Durant/Horford draft and left us out in the cold.
First, you say that “puff their chest out and be a big player, saying they’ll draft Ricky Rubio”. But that isn’t really the case. There has only been about 1% of all mock drafts having Memphis take him (and instead, they all say things like “rubio is the 2nd best player, but Memphis is ran by a bunch of idiots, so there isn’t a chance in hell they draft the best player, we will give them Thabeet but we suspect they might draft Wayne Ellington 2nd”). There have been no articles in the local paper we are puffing out our chest saying we will take Rubio. In fact, the beat writer has been on the radio constantly saying how much Rubio sucks and how awesome Mike Conley and Thabeet are, and basically telling the fans that despite what every scout says, Rubio isn’t any good. And BTW, Ron Tillery is very close to our owner. You have every national media outlet saying we aren’t drafting Rubio.
Basically the only quote that says anything about us taking Rubio is one where chris wallace says “if we want Rubio, we will take Rubio” and says he isn’t scared about Rubio not playing here or his buyout or what not.
That isn’t puffing out one’s chest. That is just saying what you should say. How would the Griz get treated if our GM said “we are deathly scared of Dan Fegan. I’m not drafting Ricky Rubio because I’m scared of getting beat up. Please, come take advantage of the Memphis Grizzlies right now”.
So really, if he says we will draft him if we want, or he says, we won’t draft him….either way, the national media and fans of other teams will use it to make fun of the Grizzlies.
And really, hasn’t that been the main theme since the Lottery? To make fun of the Grizzlies, the organization, and Memphis, the city.
I don’t see how any objectionable observer could see it any other way. And it really is sorta unfair, despite me also believing that our leadership is shall we say lacking. But ask TZ and I’m sure he will agree that for the most part, the Chad Fords and Jonathon Givony’s of the world have been extremely unfair to Memphis for the last month.
So, where does Memphis stand? As I have synthesized the various local and national reports, along with some stuff I’ve been told in confidential from local media (I need to say that I contribute to 3 Shades of Blue on occasion), here is how the situation is stacking up.
—Chris Wallace (the only real talent evaluator in the organization that isn’t an idiot) likes Ricky Rubio. If it was his choice alone, that would be the pick. But he isn’t head of heels in love with him enough to put his foot down and demand we take Rubio.
—Hollins, our new coach who has been given as much final say in the pick as Wallace (kill me now), is a fan of 2 players. Thabeet and Curry.
—The scouting department is torn between Thabeet and Curry.
—Harden and Evans remain in the mix, with Evans probably slightly above Harden, but they have no intention of drafting either at #2.
—There is a 50% chance we draft Thabeet, a 40% chance we draft and trade Rubio, and a 10% chance of a wildcard being thrown in.
—There is still open talks with the Twolves regarding swapping KLove and the #2.
And finally, Michael Heisley told Chip of 3SoB that he will be making the final call on draft night after being presented the options and arguments for each option.
Personally, i’m pissed and a little sick to my stomach that the one year we actually get the 1 or 2 pick, the waters is so poisoned that foreign and american players alike are trying to avoid being selected by Memphis. Why couldn’t have Durant told Seattle and Atlanta that he wasn’t going to go there if they drafted him?
Sour grapes? Yes……but you guys are in a great position of losing the lottery and still winning, so I think all this “bash Memphis” talk I keep reading on every post is not fair at all. The chance of you guys getting Rubio are good, no need to find as many ways as possible to bash Memphis in the process. Be glad that you lost the lottery in the right year.
by zackmann on Jun 22, 2009 4:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If Chris Wallace is your only non-idiot in the organization
You really are in trouble.
by nbrans on Jun 22, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
chris wallace also gets a bad rap
the pau trade was heisley’s doing….chris made the best of what he could do…….
and chris was behind the mayo trade….
in fact, chris wallace has drafted really well, even with boston…….he hasn’t been the best at using the direction his bosses told him via trades, however (the bad boston trades where pushed for by Pitno in order to get them further in the playoffs….the went to the conference finals that year)
by zackmann on Jun 22, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That shows poor historical knowledge
Pitino was fired by the time the Celtics made the ECF. It was Jim O’Brien that year.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
either way
why is it necessary to bash on Memphis while you gloat about winning the lottery despite getting drawn 4th? Basically any mention of Memphis on this thread and virtually any thread I’ve read is used to say how bad memphis is.
but you are not alone, chad ford and jonathon givony has been the leaders of the “bash memphis” crowd. I just think it is too easy and a little lazy to just pile it on memphis.
It just seems that the media is mad that Memphis got #2….I’m sure if we got #1, we’d hear how Blake Girffin will go play in Greece before playing for Memphis….
by zackmann on Jun 22, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't bashed Memphis
I don’t care about Memphis the city. I think Heisley is a terrible owner (if he isn’t the worst in the NBA—Sterling is), and Wallace isn’t that smart of a GM. But, believe what you wish.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In addition, zachmann...
I think that most (if not all) of the perceived “bashing” is really just “wishful thinking” on the part of Rubio fans in Sacramento.
It’s easier to believe that Rubio may actually be available at #4 (which would have been the overwhelming choice here if Sacramento had gotten #2) if Memphis is scared/dumb/crazy/threatened enough to pass on him.
I wouldn’t take any of it personally, and the fact that it’s all being said internally (i.e. at StR) and not in a Memphis forum (e.g. 3SoB) goes to show the lack of vitriol that you may be reading into any of the commentary.
Just thought it should be said.
by smgmatt on Jun 22, 2009 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too quick to post?
I just noticed that some of these points are made below . . . I posted this as I was reading through the comments, so I apologize if I stepped on/repeated any points that were made before mine (but fall lower on the page).
by smgmatt on Jun 22, 2009 6:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shit happens
Go drink a beer.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 6:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No worries
I was over it before I hit post . . . just thought I should clarify.
by smgmatt on Jun 22, 2009 6:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, respect
It’s overrated.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 6:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for dropping in zackmann
I agree, some of the criticism of Memphis here is over the top, but it’s an offshoot of the hope some here have of getting Rubio.
And I’ve mentioned in the past that I don’t really care for a player’s strategy of trying to dictate where he lands in the draft. If you apply for the draft, you should be a professional and report to whatever team grabs you IMO.
Having said that, Memphis (whether by Heisley’s hand or Wallace’s) has shot itself in the foot enough times to develop a near comical reputation in the league, so your team’s management aren’t exempt from criticism. And a guy like Rubio happens to have leverage that college players don’t have – I may not think it’s completely ethical to use that leverage, but then again – I’m not sure I wouldn’t do the same if I was in his shoes.
Good luck in the draft…
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
People want Rubio so much they start bashing the team with the #2 pick just because they might pick him.
But loooordy don’t suggest things get irrational around here when it comes to Rubio. No sir, no sir.
Am I right, otis29? Am I right?
by nbrans on Jun 22, 2009 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very nice
One thread was not enough eh?
See, I used the following words – “some here”. Those words – “some here” – rather than “Everyone around here” or “Sactown Royalty views” or even “The vast majority” is really the way to provide a bit more accurate assessment of the climate at this site.
But what do I know? I’m part of the Rubio Cheerleading Squad. Well, that is unless we pick Evans.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
fair enough
i make fun of our organization all the time too…..maybe not for the same reasons, though
when i look at the situation of rubio, you guys have only 2 things that make it more appealing than memphis or OKC….
—No good PG (sorry, i’m implying here that Beno sucks)
—Lots of Mexicans
really, that is it……
the more positive approach to being happy that you got 4th but still get Rubio (assuming Presti also takes the idiot pills, which I don’t think he does) is to be happy you gave Beno the MLE and that tons of mexicans live in California. If it wasn’t for the extra endorsement deals Rubio would get in California, going there over memphis would cost him a lot of money. And if you happen to have Mike Conley or Westbrook as your PG instead of Beno on the MLE, he would be trying to go somewhere else beside Sac…..
And I admit….I’m jealous.
We got screwed in the 03 draft….
We got screwed in the 07 draft….
We sorta got screwed in the 08 draft….
We finally get lucky, and we get screwed again. I’m sure next year there will be 4 can’t miss prospects, the Griz will have the worst record in the league and we will draw #5.
Even still, my point remains. The National media is bashing the griz because it is easy and they suck as writers…plus they don’t want a top pick to go to Memphis…..and other teams fans are bashing the griz because….well I’m not sure….I guess if you make fun of the Grizzlies, you know you aren’t the worst organization in the league…..and that makes fans feel good….not being last…..
by zackmann on Jun 22, 2009 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don't know why all other NBA fans hate you? We all hate you for this!

Absolutely unforgivable. Do you have any idea the kind of pain Memphis has caused the last two years? That’s your organization screwing everyone else, and no one made you do it.
by bignerd on Jun 22, 2009 4:43 PM PDT up reply actions 8 recs
LOL
I’m torn between rec’ing the content or flagging the picture.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement.
by Aykis16 on Jun 22, 2009 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
If the Grizz have the worst record next year
They’ll only be able to drop to 4. Just like the Kings this year.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There are more than 2 things
Better ownership and a better general manager. No offense, but the decline we’ve had the last few years here doesn’t fully change Petrie’s track record, or that of the current ownership.
And…see what bignerd said above.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 22, 2009 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lots of Mexicans
They go to SacCiudadReal.com. Mucho Grande blog!!! At least 10 times bigger than this english, small sister version blog. BTW, saying hispanic or latin would circulate better than mexican.
by bignerd on Jun 22, 2009 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Who gives a shit
He’s not wrong. There ARE A LOT of Mexicans. Even if he thinks of people from Guatemala, El Salvador, Panama, or any other country in South America as Mexicans, he’s still not wrong that the majority of Spanish Speakers in Sacto and Cali are still Mexican in general.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 5:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m just giving him the PC word before someone decides to get pissy.
by bignerd on Jun 22, 2009 5:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is Pookey you're talking too.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement.
by Aykis16 on Jun 22, 2009 6:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
links
read these 3 links and tell me how Memphis is puffing out their chest about taking Rubio. If anything they are conceding they aren’t taking him….
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2009/jun/21/nba-draftthursday-6-pm-cdt-new-york-espn-quick/
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2009/jun/18/more-questions-than-answers/
by zackmann on Jun 22, 2009 4:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Links
The 1st two links don’t really talk about Rubio. On this site we’ve had plenty of articles discussing Evans, but I wouldn’t use those as evidence that Sacramento wasn’t interested in Rubio. The first two links do not support my statement that Memphis is “puffing out their chest”, but they also do not disprove anything.
The third link includes the quote I was referencing:
“If we want (Rubio), we’re going to take him,” Wallace said Wednesday. “We wouldn’t have taken a 10-hour flight to Spain if we didn’t have interest in him.”
This quote supports the point I was trying to make. I believe that Memphis wants to trade down, but they are struggling to get good offers because none of the other teams think that Memphis will actually draft Rubio. Wallace’s quote is a direct rebuttal to those points, in an effort to get better offers. This, in my mind, is puffing one’s chest out.
My full paragraph read as follows:
The Grizzlies are trying to puff their chest out and be a big player, saying they’ll draft Ricky Rubio, but nobody is buying it. Chris Wallace is already a bit of a laughingstock, and he can’t afford to end up with egg on his face again. Deep down, he knows he cannot go toe-to-toe with Fegan. And he knows he would have zero leverage if he drafted Rubio and tried to trade him. Wallace has made some dumb moves, but I have faith that he is smart enough to realize this (can’t be that dumb, right? Right?). So the Grizzlies will not draft him.
I call Wallace a laughingstock. This is based on league perception. As you mentioned, it is a common theme for writers to bash on Memphis. I was not bashing on him, simply stating the perception of him. I follow that up with the idea that he cannot afford to have egg on his face again. I state this because I think he’s probably gotten a worse rep than he deserves. But if he blunders the #2 pick, his reputation will get worse. I state that Memphis would lack leverage if they draft Rubio and try to trade him, and then I give Wallace credit to be smart enough to know this!
I’m really sorry if you took this as an insult to your team. That was not my intent. I was trying to interpret a messy situation, and the many subtle nuances that were involved. If I took liberties in my tone, they were based on personal hope towards a specific outcome, as well as an attempt to write something that would appeal to this target audience.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Jun 23, 2009 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where the Griz are
Signs point to a win-win for Sacramento and Memphis. Two likely scenarios:
1. Memphis snags Rubio in hopes of making a deal with Sac for Evans.
Sac has the upper hand in this deal with Sac, if no other team comes up with a good offer, obviously the league knows Rubio doesn’t want to sign with Memphis.
2.Memphis bites the bullet, plays it safe and takes either Evans (who they really want) or Thabeet, Rubio is still on the board for Sac, and Sac hopes OKC passes, which is likely.
Don’t believe the Memphis “not really interested in Evans talk”. Mumblings in the Memphis front office say #2 is most likely. But if Sac gets Evans instead of Rubio, are we really that bad off?
by theinsider on Jun 22, 2009 4:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Question
If Minny is really dangling Kevin Love for Rubio, then wouldn’t Presti just take that deal (regardless of what pick cam back with it)?
To be honest, the odds of Rubio falling to #4 are probably not nearly as good as has been talked about around here lately. Somewhere along the line, “best case scenario” (Rubio falling to #4 without having to trade up to get him) has seemingly turned into almost a given.
I’m just saying that you shouldn’t assume that if Rubio gets past Memphis that he’s a lock to fall to #4.
Everyone in the pro-Rubio camp can hope that he’s available with the 4th overall pick (I know I am), but I hope that they’re also prepared for the likelihood that this will probably not be the case (I think I am).
In any case, the 2009 StR Draft Threads™ will be EPIC.
by smgmatt on Jun 22, 2009 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm coming here late
but I agree that the negative Rubio rumblings from the Kings are posturing. So is the talk about selling #23. Both, I think, are warning shots to Memphis that even a package of 4 and 23 may not be offered for Rubio if the Grizzlies take him at 2 since “we may be selling 2,” and “we don’t really like Rubio that much anyway.” At least that’s what I’d be doing if I were in the Kings FO.
by LPKingsFan on Jun 22, 2009 6:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't get that whole "Memphis has no leverage if they draft Rubio"
Fegan tried the exact same stuff with Yi, and guess what, the Bucks didn’t blink and took him. The next year they traded him and scrubs for Richard Jefferson. They didn’t exactly win the lottery with that, but are still better off today for it.
If Memphis drafts Rubio, they have his rights. Rubio isn’t on great terms with Badalona anymore. Either he plays for Memphis, or they can trade him later. They don’t have to do it on draft night. But they can. Passing up on Rubio when they know other teams covet him would be the dumb thing to do for Wallace.
by Norsktroll on Jun 22, 2009 7:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
But would they have been better off picking someone who could actually play?
Jefferson is not essential to the Bucks future. In fact his salary is holding them back and is a big reason that they’re probably going to lose two very promising players in Charlie Villanueva and Ramon Sessions.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement.
by Aykis16 on Jun 22, 2009 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Memphis
Would only have his rights for two years, during which time he is under contract to Spain. He doesn’t have to buy his way out, and if they hold hard feelings toward him, they can trade him.
If he doesn’t want to play in Memphis, he doesn’t buy out his contract, waits for their rights to expire, then gets drafted by someone else at the ripe old age of 20.
Ricky Rubio has all the leverage in the world to keep from playing in Memphis.
The draft lottery has reinforced my belief that there are not enough bad words in the English language.
by LeaguePassAddict on Jun 22, 2009 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
To add to that
Other teams know Rubio doesn’t want to play in Memphis so are going to try to low-ball the Grizz meaning theyare not getting true value for Rubio. Why not just draft someone else that will give them overall better value than having to deal with all this Rubio drama.
One more point, and I’m sure many will disagree but Memphis HAS to be thinking about their reputation. After the Gasol trade and just overall being cheap, Memphis has a bad reputation around the league and, as shown by almost all good prospects not wanting to work out for them, players just don’t want to play there. They have to start changing that and drafting Rubio and dragging the situation along doesn’t help that at all.
by eduardo_m7 on Jun 22, 2009 8:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think he has all the leverage in the world
Is he really going to call someone’s bluff at this point? He burned his bridges with his old club and basically went all-in on the NBA. After all that, is he really going to go back to Spain just because Memphis drafted him? I really don’t see it.
I don’t doubt that he and Fegan would rather have him in Sacramento or OKC and are trying to make that happen, but Rubio does not have a whole lot of leverage.
by nbrans on Jun 22, 2009 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Once the buyout is taken care of
He can sign with anyone he likes over there I believe? So he should have some leverage, albeit not a lot.
But the indications from his agent a few weeks back was that Rubio was 100% in for the NBA next season. Fegan is just doing the waltz with the teams with the top 4 picks now.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 23, 2009 5:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
European teams...
…can offer MORE towards his buy-out than NBA teams. They can contribute quite a bit more actually. IF the Grizz take him and won’t trade him, YES, I could see him going to a different club to help ‘buy him out’ for one year and playing on the cheap. That club would re-coup what they lost in Rubio in that ONE year alone due to his popularity over there. Rubio has a LOT of leverage in this game of chicken, and i doubt Wallace has the stones(nor should he) to call his bluff. This is a TOP 2 pick. You CAN’T screw this up!
by Smills91 on Jun 23, 2009 7:22 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not correct, the Spurs and Magic are holding on to Splitter and Vasquez for longer
by Norsktroll on Jun 22, 2009 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And in the case of Splitter
The Spurs may be willing to overpay Splitter to get him out of his contract with Tau Ceramica.
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In 2010 that is
Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
by pookeyguru on Jun 22, 2009 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ripe old age of
snicker
:)
m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!
by JediLeroy on Jun 22, 2009 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just because thabeet has not been in to see the kings
does not mean GP wouldn’t draft him.
He is a legit + 7 foot shot blocker. If petrie decides thats what he wants, then thats what he’ll draft.
I don’t agree at all with any of the Must do stuff. If GP has shown anything it’s a willingness to do whatever the hell he likes if he thinks it’s the right decision.
If it gets to #4 and rubio is off the table and evans is gone, he’ll take his next best option and live with it. Be that accepting a trade down, drafting a player for a team lower than 5, etc etc.
" Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes, that way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. "
by Bushka on Jun 22, 2009 8:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If GP has shown anything it’s a willingness to do whatever the hell he likes if he thinks it’s the right decision.
But he does whatever he wants after doing the proper research. That’s why he drafted Jason Thompson. JT worked out a couple times for the Kings. Petrie and the scouting dept did their due diligence. They have not done that with Thabeet, therefore they won’t draft him.
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Jun 22, 2009 8:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i just don't buy it
Thabeets playing it smart. He is such a known quantity he has had numerous nationally televised appearances and played against all kinds of players who the kings have had in. It’s not like he would have excelled in shooting 3’s or shown amazing up and down court speed.
He blocks shots he is 7-3. It’s about all you can really need to know about the guy.
" Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes, that way when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes. "
by Bushka on Jun 22, 2009 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not really
You still have to see if what the kid has offensively, even if it’s limited. You have to interview him to see what his personality/intelligence is like.
Maybe if you were considering a guy like Thabeet outside the lottery you could pick him sight unseen, but not in the top 4.
With the 4th pick in the 2009 NBA Draft, the Sacramento Kings select Rickeke Flynenningday, point guard from Europe, Memphis, Syracuse, UCLA and Parts Unknown.
by otis29 on Jun 23, 2009 5:25 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
how is everyone so sure OKC won't take rubio? I think they're more likely than memphis
by KingsForLife on Jun 22, 2009 9:10 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Then they have two point guards who need the ball in their hands to be effective
and Rubio’s much more of a project player than Westbrook is. They’re more likely to draft a 2 guard like Harden or DeRozan or even Curry.
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Jun 22, 2009 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention...
…that’d be the WORSE outside shooting backcourt in the entire NBA, which would allow defenses to collapse on Durant rendering Durant AND westbrook much less effective.
by Smills91 on Jun 23, 2009 7:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
















