time for the next step
2009 draft is now history. We pick tyreke evans to be our point. Now, its time for K9's expiring contract to go to work. In my opinion, we should EITHER get a PF/C or a SF..
Amare Stoudamire.
Second, if your not down we the first, then we should, in ny opinion get a SF (see Explosive 1 2 3 fan post). With our new backcourt combo filling the 1 and 2 spot and JT/Hawes filling the 4/5, i think we got a hole in the 3 position, I kknow that we have Garcia and Noc for that matter, but i personally think these guys are not starting 3, but more of an energy-off-the-bench 3 guys. Garcia is our sixth man and noc... i just dont feel it. We need a SF who could play above the rim, excite the crowd with rim-rattling dunks, shoot decently from the perimeter and play defense at the same time. My guy here is Josh Smith. He is just an incredible athlete. High-flyer, decent mid range shooter, and most of all, he can play some D which is highlighted by his multiple blocks per game. Atlanta recently acquired Jamal Crawford. JJ, Crawford, and Smith are all 3 starters. I dont think one of them is gonna be cool playing sixthman because of their superstar ego, so sac should be able to answer that problem, we get smith and they get Noc/Garcia plus K9. Atlanta would get the six man they wants in the person of Noc/Garcia, without having the starters' ego problem because either of these two guys are very comfortable coming off the bench, because that was the original role these two guys have in their previous teams. Plus, atlanta wants to resign mike bibby. They should be able to do that because of K9's expiring contract. Then, we get an explosive SF via a josh smith. So with that trade, we will have:
Tyreke Evans
Kevin Martin
Josh Smith
Jason Thompson
Spencer Hawes
Among the two I prefer the first trade scenario.
Please Comment.
(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
i would not hesitate to trade for josh smith
he brings defense, energy, athleticism, to the SF position
we desperatly need all three of those things
that team would not only be a great improvement on defense but also an extremely fun team to watch
BRING IT ON
by 31_FLAVAS on Jun 26, 2009 2:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
his 7 million dollar buyout for whoever trades for him really sucks tho
by 31_FLAVAS on Jun 26, 2009 2:26 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
He has a 7 mil buyout? To who?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Jun 26, 2009 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
trade kicker but it goes away soon.
"Or, as Randy Jackson would say: Not feelin’ it, dawg."
-bench-blob- posting virgin.
by jjham15 on Jun 26, 2009 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Amare
Is he really a top 10 player in the league?
I don’t get the appeal of this guy, yeh he puts up good numbers, and is a phenomonal athlete, albeit one who has micfrofracture surgery on his knee. He doesn’t play D and really shows no signs of wanting to, he wants to get paid. In short I don’t see him as guy who really cares about winning
Zach Randolph is a 20/10 guy, I wouldn’t want him either
by Murf on Jun 26, 2009 1:20 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Amare doesn't rebound either.
He’s really weak on the boards. And when you consider his athletic ability that’s pretty pathetic because you get the idea he just doesn’t want to make the effort in that aspect of the game.
Hey, if you’ve got great rebounding elsewhere in the line-up and you want to run a super-up-tempo offense like Phoenix did under D’Antoni, then Amare can be a very effective player.
But the Kings don’t have those kind of players and it seems they’re not gonna run that kind of offense. Stoudemire would be a terrible fit on this roster.
"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)
by Mucho Moss on Jul 3, 2009 1:17 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
way rather have josh smith
with tyreke kmart shock and hawes
ages of 19 26 23 23 and 21
by 31_FLAVAS on Jun 26, 2009 1:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















