Sactown Royalty: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

In Which the Sacramento Kings are Compared to the Portland Trail Blazers

As you all know, our beloved Sacramento Kings were the worst team in the NBA last season, falling to a measly 17-65 record, a franchise worst.  But we still have hope that with our young talent we have hit rock bottom, and there is nowhere to go but up.

So where do the Trail Blazers come into this?  Well I've heard a lot of comparisons with Sacramento and Portland, mostly just because they're a couple of the teams in the league that have tried rebuilding with young talent through the draft and getting rid of bad personalities and contracts.  For the Trail Blazers, this was a successful strategy, and they finished 4th in the West last season with a fantastic young nucleus that is still developing.  The Kings obviously hope to emulate this success, so lets see what it took to get the Blazers from NBA worst, to one of the better teams in the league.  And are the Kings all that similar?

Star-divide

For much of the 80s and 90s, Portland was considered a good to great team.  The Blazers were perennial players in the NBA Playoffs, and had a run of 21 straight seasons until the 2003-04 season.  Then came a few years of middling to below average effort by the team, as its stars were getting older, and its off-court issues dominated the locker room and media, earning the team the moniker "Jail Blazers".

The 2005-06 Blazers were the league's worst team, ending with a record of 21-61, having struggled as they dealt with the loss of many of their star veterans like Rasheed Wallace, Bonzi Wells and Arvydas Sabonis.  They were still a relatively young team, compared to most teams, but had a few veterans, such as Voshon Lenard, Theo Ratliff, and Ruben Patterson.  Obviously management realized that whatever happened, wasn't good enough and it was time to start over.  None of those three players were on the team next year. 

So the summer began and Portland, with the worst record, ended up with the #4 pick in the draft.  But they also had Boston's #7 pick from a previous trade.  Two lottery picks were nothing to sneeze at.  With the #4 and 7 selections, in a draft the experts called weak, Portland chose Tyrus Thomas and Randy Foye.  Then began the start of the Kevin Pritchard draft day dealings.  Portland trade the rights to Thomas and Viktor Khryapa for the rights to the #2 pick, LaMarcus Aldridge, and a future 2nd round pick.  Then in a seperate trade, Portland traded the rights to Foye to the Minnesota Timberwolves for the rights to the #6 pick, Brandon Roy.  Along with these trades, Portland also acquired Spanish Point Guard Sergio Rodriguez from Phoenix for cash, and drafted Australian Joel Freeland with the 30th pick in the draft (who has yet to come over).

Next year, with Portland's new look team, they posted a record of 32-50.  The team was improving, and it helped that the Blazers had gotten such strong lottery selections, as both Aldridge and Roy looked to be future stars, with Roy winning the Rookie of the Year award.  But there were still some problems with the team, especially with their leading scorer, Zach Randolph, whose big contract and nutty brain were bringing down the team.  He needed to be moved.  Again this would come on draft day, and big draft day moves would become synonymous with Pritchards name.

In the Draft Lottery, unlike the last year where the Blazers got "screwed" by the lottery in getting the 4th pick, this time Portland crushed the odds and got the #1 pick in the draft with only a 5% chance.  Selecting Greg Oden of Ohio, the Blazers again were not content to simply wait.  The Blazers unloaded the last of their headcases, Zach Randolph, to the New York Knicks in a move that did not seem good for them talent wise.  In return for Randolph, Fred Jones, Dan Dickau and Demetris Nichols, the Knicks only gave up Channing Frye, Steve Francis way past his prime and a 2008 second round pick.  But the move did help the Blazers, as Frye was a promising young talent they could evaluate, and they got rid of Randolphs massive contract in return for Francis's expiring deal.

Unfortunately for Portland, Oden injured himself before the start of the NBA season and ended up missing the entire season.  Still, behind All-Star Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge, the Blazers were steadily improving, and finished the season at 41-41, failing to reach the playoffs but showing tremendous potential, especially for such a young team.  Of the veterans on this team, only Przybilla had an impact on the floor, while Pritchard let Center Raef Lafrentz and his expiring contract simply expire and pocket the money instead of using the contract as trade bait.

In 08-09 the Blazers acquired even more young talent.  On Draft Day they traded with the Indiana Pacers to acquire Guard Jerryd Bayless, and they drafted Forward Nicolas Batum.  Also, Rudy Fernandez, a player they had acquired in a draft day deal two years earlier for cash, had come to join the team from overseas, and Greg Oden came back from his injury.  Together with the now veteran young players,  Portland went on to win 54 games and become the 4th seed in the Western Conference.  But youth could not trump experience and the Blazers lost to the Rockets in the first round.

So the Blazers went from the worst in the NBA to 4th in the West in 3 complete seasons.  Can the Kings do the same?  Perhaps but its important to look at how the Blazers were able to do it:

1. A focus on ridding the team of bad contracts, aging players, and nutcases.

2. Bringing in as much talent as possible, through trades and picks in the draft.

3. Capitalizing on teams that are looking to save money by acquiring picks with cash.

4. Avoiding spending any money on the free agent market.

5. Building around a solid core of young stars and creating an identity.

The Kings have started to do a few of those things.  Number 1 on that list has definitely been a priority.  #2 has never been Geoff's style, but he did acquire some talent in the draft this year through a trade, trading the 31st pick to Portland for Sergio Rodriguez and Jon Brockman.  Petrie also is very good at selecting talent and used the Ron Artest deal to acquire the #23 pick (Casspi). Number 3 won't work for Sacramento, at least not now, because we need all the money we can get.  Number 4, Petrie seems to be getting.  The franchise already regrets its MLE offer to Beno Udrih, and will probably look to try to move him and Andres Nocioni to be rid of their contracts, although a trade might be hard to come by.  And the Kings are definitely building around a core of young players.  Which exact young players though, its not quite clear yet.  Martin is the current star of the team, but he's not the kind of guy you build around.  Thompson and Hawes don't really have franchise labels, although they're good players.  The Kings are hoping Evans will be that player, but we'll have to wait and see.

This team probably won't succeed as fast as Portland did.  The circumstances are different.  These players have played for almost as many coaches as the years they've been in the league.  McMillan was with his guys from the beginning.  So we'll see what Westphal can do.  But I think its clear that we are building through young talent, just as Portland did.  Portland got darn lucky in the draft lottery, and they have an owner who was willing to shell out money so his aggressive GM could go out and buy.  

Portland went from worst to 4th in 3 seasons. I don't see us going that far that fast.  Depending on how our picks turn out, and how Westphal implements his system and such, I definitely think we could make the playoffs in 2 or 3 seasons.  But we're likely in for one, if not two more lottery years.  And thats ok.  As long as the team keeps improving.  It worked for Portland, and it can work for us.  And who knows? Petrie's different than Pritchard.  He's used Free Agency and trades to make his team a lot better (see summer of 98).  We could be back a lot sooner than we think.

(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)

6 recs  |  Comment 63 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

good read

i didnt realize how similar we are to what the blazers did
we will be back in the playoffs soon

evans to kmart !!!!!

by 31_FLAVAS on Jul 13, 2009 11:58 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Portland is the model franchise for rebuilding

If the Kings plan is anything close, I’ll be happy.

by DesertFox on Jul 14, 2009 1:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Aykis I would like to take the opportunity to call you a douche

For daring to compare to the [redacted] to our beloved worthless dipshits. Good day sir!

Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jul 14, 2009 1:18 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think

a general word for this is ‘Rebuilding’. Is Portland’s case much different from the norm? It might be in that they are executing the rebuilding process well. Now that they have their young core it’s time to sprinkle in some vets and make a run.

I think that we need at least one more top 5 pick to have the talent around to be considered done with the ‘gathering young talent’ phase and move to the ‘develop and fill-in with vets’ phase.

by DustyG on Jul 14, 2009 9:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Think Portland is more the exception...

Because they seemed to “hit” with all their draft picks over the last couple of years. Roy, Aldridge, Fernandez, Bayless, Batum. They only question mark pick will probably be Oden and that is because of his injuries. Staying away from draft busts always pays off. Aint that right, Pervis Ellison?

That is what the Kings have to do is to make sure that they make solid, quality draft picks based more on “overall talent” than “filling a team’s need”. Always believed a GM’s rule of thumb should be “Draft for talent, trade for team needs”.

by Fredman on Jul 14, 2009 10:38 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Correct

without scoring a ‘hit’ with Brandon Roy, the Blazers would be nowhere special.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Jul 14, 2009 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

No car flags necessary.

by JETisKing on Jul 15, 2009 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

if only

The Blazers have a good young big with a possible All-star future with Aldridge. If only Spencer and Shock would prove to me they were worth keeping around… They are good but is Spence ever going to be as good as Aldridge? Don’t tell me they play a different position, Hawes is a forward until he can actually defend some big centers man to man.

Kevin is underrated but I think he can be at least as effective as Roy. If he stays on the court.

We might be better off quicker than expected depending on Evans. The Blazers covet a good point player and would kill for someone like him.

So there bigs are better, but our backcourt might end up great. 3 years until homecourt advantage in the playoffs? I can live with that.

This is gonna be fun.

by Ice_9ine on Jul 14, 2009 10:58 AM PDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

We seriously need another piece in the frontcourt

We have all our eggs in the Hawes/JT basket right now. Hopefully we can address that with a trade of Noce or something along those lines, but we must add another young (true) big who has the potential to be a starter – and let them settle it on the court.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Jul 14, 2009 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

We need another big, one with all-star potential. But I’m not sure if a trade if needed now.

Maybe we wait, see how our current players do with Westphal, and then hope for someone in the draft.

I have a feeling P-Dub wants to run a little, and we need someone who can play that style, a young Kemp, or Amare, someone like that.

by Ice_9ine on Jul 14, 2009 11:39 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

No sense in waiting if you can score somone young with potential

If JT or Hawes go down for any length of time – what then? We’re crazy thin depth-wise at the the 4 and 5.
I wasn’t advocating trading for an expensive established star.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Jul 14, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unless - (woof!)???

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Jul 14, 2009 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yep mad thin

But who is out there that we could get? For Nocioni and/or Beno? Nobody wants them. And especially nobody wants to give up the type of player that we are talking about.

The depth is bad, but I think we will have to hold tight for a permanent answer is all. Because the right now it seems like we will have some summer league filler for this season.

I get the feeling Donte is gonna get time at the 4 spot. If he focuses on being quick to the basket that could be great. Brockman is all hustle. So maybe some 7 footer for fouls is all Petrie does this season. Bryant on the VSL team seems good enough for that.

by Ice_9ine on Jul 14, 2009 12:31 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Lots of guys from last years class

that a team a litle closer might move for Noce, to be good now.

I’d think a number of teams might be interested in him, especially by the trade deadline – but maybe sooner. Remember, his contract gets cheaper over the next few years.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Jul 14, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Young big with potential??

I heard next year’s draft is loaded with bigs. I heard we may have another lottery pick as well.

by eduardo_m7 on Jul 14, 2009 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd rather have a guy with a year or two under his belt

Too many freakin’ rookies is not always a good thing.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Jul 14, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What can you offer for Pryz?

Big D from Blog-A-Bull - "Pritchard is such a genius that teams just give him players for free."

Greg Oden - The only other rookie with more than 500 points, 400 rebounds, and 65 blocks in under 1400 minutes played. Since 1946

by FiveOhThree-RipCity!! on Jul 14, 2009 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beno Udrih

The future begins now...

by eduardo_m7 on Jul 15, 2009 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd give up Garcia or Noc or Udrih

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jul 15, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure about Garcia

But yes for the other 2

The future begins now...

by eduardo_m7 on Jul 15, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nothing against Garcia

But he’s $23 millon guaranteed vs. $14 million for Pryz (halve that if Pryz opts out next year). So we fill a glaring need and shed contract one way of the other.

That said, I do not know what would compel Portland to deal Pryzbilla.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jul 15, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My only concern with dealing Cisco

is that our SF position, as deep as it may seem, is probably the one that needs the most work. If Greene and Casspi don’t pan out, and we know Noc is not part of our future, then Cisco is the only “sure thing” we have (as the backup 2-3 of course).

I don’t know what would make them trade Joel either.

The future begins now...

by eduardo_m7 on Jul 15, 2009 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But Garcia is BYC

I don’t know that Portland will be able to do that deal.

Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jul 15, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or would want to commit their cap space to Garcia like that I should say

Evil Cowtown Inc: Screwin' Suckaz over since Nineteen Eighty-Five.....

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jul 15, 2009 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jul 15, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Portland not giving up Pryz...

They can’t afford to give up Pryz because one never knows when Oden is going to get hurt again.

About the only person we can throw at them is Beno. However, I don’t see Beno being any better than Blake or Bayless that are currently on Portland’s roster.

Their roster has their own logjam of SFs so I am pretty sure that they aren’t going to want to add one of ours to their mix.

by Fredman on Jul 18, 2009 8:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed....

Hey, isn’t the projected #1 talent in next years draft at center? Maybe, we get lucky and get the #1 pick with and get that guy. Trading for talented bigs is a hard thing to do because they aren’t but a handful of them in the NBA currently and not a lot of them can be found in the college ranks as well. So Hawes/JT may not be the best, but they sure aren’t the worse and they still have a couple more years to grow

by Fredman on Jul 18, 2009 8:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hawes position

Hawes is better at defending Cs than PFs, so I consider him a C. You’re right, he has a hard time covering centers, but I think he’s worse with PFs.

I agree with lttg’s response to your post as well. We need another big, and I would try to do that through the draft.

by DustyG on Jul 14, 2009 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tough to compare

Pritchard fleeced Chicago and Minnesota getting Roy and Aldridge. Those type of steals don’t happen often. I have faith that Petrie has the potential to pull of deals like those, but they’re tough to do unless they are on draft day.

And even though Oden hasn’t made a big impact yet, you can’t compare our rebuilding efforts to Portland’s when they lucked into the first pick.

Ultimately, every franchise is different. No two rebuilding efforts will be exactly the same, but there are some good lessons to be learned. Get rid of headcases, avoid overspending on free agents, draft well.

P.S., I thought LaFrenz’s deal just expired this year.

Never forget: I am a complete idiot

by Exhibit G on Jul 14, 2009 11:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

yes, LaF just expired

insurance was paying a lot (85%?) of his salary for the last two years.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Jul 14, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's right.

My bad.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.

by Aykis16 on Jul 14, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It happens

no worries

Never forget: I am a complete idiot

by Exhibit G on Jul 14, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rule #4: Avoiding spending any money on the free agent market---EXACTLY

Well, not exactly, but close. The situations are different in that for three years in a row the Blazers had between two and three first round picks per year, including draft deals with other teams. In 2006, it was Aldridge, Roy, and Rodriguez. In 2007, it was Oden, Fernandez, and Koponen. In 2008, it was Bayless and Batum. This put the Blazers in the enviable position of having a ton of young, cheap talent, thus allowing them to undertake a prolonged talent evaluation period involving NO free agents.

The Kings are not so fortunate (or perhaps Petrie is less shrewd than Pritchard) and so their young first-round talent is less extensive and possibly not as good. Still, when people start clamoring for the Kings to make a play at Hedo or Ariza, I don’t think that makes a lot of sense at this point. IMO, the Kings strategy in free agency should be to stay more or less on the sidelines unless they can either find a bargain (recall the first Bobby Jackson signing) or a veteran who brings leadership, needed skills, and big-time intangibles (recall Vlade). Maybe down the road, a high-priced first-tier free agent will make sense, provided he’s young, has a huge upside, and comes with a minimum of red flags.

One interesting point to add is that (according to Wikipedia anyway), as assistant GM in 2005, Pritchard pushed his superiors to draft Chris Paul with the #3 pick, but was overruled when the Blazers traded down for Martell Webster and a future pick. Mindful of the fact that their future draft positions might have been different with Paul in the line-up, can you imagine that Blazers team with Chris Paul on it. Ho-lee crap!

Anyway, nice post Aykis. Rec’d.

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Jul 14, 2009 2:25 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Portland didn't quite avoid FA spending

Pritchard went and got Blake for $4 million a year.

But the main post has the essence of what he was doing. He didn’t go the FA route to create a winning team. He got Blake because a steady hand was needed to help the young players develop. You can’t develop young players if you can’t rely on someone to bring the ball up and start the offense. Blake was that unusual acquisition of a free agent who is there to help your young players improve.

In the case of the Kings, that might mean a relatively inexpensive big man, so that you always have someone relatively solid in the front court.

It rarely makes sense for a rebuilding team to spend big on free agency (unless you are picking up Michael Jordan or something), but it can make sense to get a role player who will make your other guys better and let the kids learn their roles without having to compensate for incompetence.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Jul 17, 2009 11:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In the NFL, the leader is the one that calls out the offense or defense

Defensively, when Noc arrived last yr he started calling out what the Kings defense should do based on how the offensive plays was developing. He wondered why no one else on the KIngs was talking. He had the experience to see things developing, but our young squad didn’t know. The guards can call out the offensive set, because everyone should know their role. But, no one knew how to play defense let alone call out what defensive set we should be in just by watching the play develop.

That’s the difference between a team getting back on defense and a team playing defense.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Jul 18, 2009 1:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was one of the big differences between Artest and Salmons

Both were very good man defenders. But Artest talked constantly, while Salmons just seemed to keep his mouth shut. None of the other Kings seemed to learn this habit from Artest, which makes you wonder if it is more of a temperment thing. If so, it is apparently something Petrie has overlooked. His focus has always seemed to be on offensive skills rather than defensive presence and leadership, which goes a long way to explaining the Kings downfall in recent years.

Artest was the only real team leader in the period since Webber and Vlade left. A leadership vacuum arose and no one really stepped in to fill it, both before Artest and after. It sounds like Noce has tried, but he apparently became frustrated very quickly. Maybe because no one was listening.

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Jul 18, 2009 1:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice post.

Big D from Blog-A-Bull - "Pritchard is such a genius that teams just give him players for free."

Greg Oden - The only other rookie with more than 500 points, 400 rebounds, and 65 blocks in under 1400 minutes played. Since 1946

by FiveOhThree-RipCity!! on Jul 14, 2009 11:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

speaking of Portland

Maybe the kings could benefit from their supposed lust of Hinrich.

Kings get Pryzbilla, a huge rebounding and defensive force.

Chicago gets Batum, our beloved K9, and mad cap space for Wade and Bosh.

Portland gets Hinrich and Tyrus.

Yay! Portland gets what they want, we get something for nothing, and Chicago continues to pray for cap relief and free agents in ’10

by Ice_9ine on Jul 15, 2009 12:41 PM PDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

I really like it, now just sell the 3 teams

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Jul 15, 2009 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow

Actually makes sense. woah.

Victory is tasty.

by iashwash on Jul 15, 2009 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And it works in the Trade Machine.

by UCIrvine kings fan on Jul 15, 2009 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Portland wouldn't do it

Batum and Przybilla for Hinrich and Tyrus? Nope. Won’t happen.

As far as I can tell, Portland’s supposed lust for Hinrich is an Internet creation, largely driven by a whole bunch of people on Blazers Edge.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Jul 17, 2009 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, I never got the impression that Hinrich was that big an upgrade over Blake

A bit better on defense perhaps, but not worth giving up your best rebounder and one of your young rising talents. And Thomas was veering dangerously close to lottery bust territory before a late season rennaisance of sorts last season. The verdict is still out on him. With Pryzbilla, you know exactly what your getting, and it is pretty solid, if unspectacular.

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Jul 18, 2009 2:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can you really model your plan after Portland?

One advantage Portland has is an owner with lots of money to flush away buying other teams 1st round draft picks. Not to mention I think he also bought out Steve Francis huge contract in order to create cap room. Neither of which can be done in Sacramento.

Also, Portland IMO is still a bit overrated. Oden isn’t exactly what you expect from a No #1 pick, nor can a team count on winning the lottery. For all the young players they have obtained they even seem lost at what to do with them at times. Not like a Kings should talk, we’ve been stocking piling SG and SF for years.

by bignerd on Jul 15, 2009 8:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Buying out Francis didn't gain any cap room

On a buyout, you are still on the hook as far as the cap is concerned. He had two more years, and stayed on the cap for those years. It expired this year, which is why Portland has cap room this summer.

It saved a couple million per year in cap and a couple million of PA’s money to buy him out — actually, it saved that doubled because it reduced luxury tax. The main factors were freeing a roster space and getting rid of a cancer.

The picks Portland purchased were Rodriguez, Batum, and Fernandez. Take those players away and you still have a playoff team. The rebuilding model is pretty sound, even if you can’t buy picks. No reason the Kings can’t do it.

Everything you said in your last paragraph is true — Oden isn’t (at least yet) what you would expect from a #1, and they haven’t really been able to mold all that young talent into a cohesive force. Yet, they still won 54 games — if Oden develops, and they put all that talent together, you are looking at 65 plus wins. To do that, the Kings probably need to luck into a superstar, either by winning the lottery or by finding a player like Brandon Roy (who fell all the way to 7 in the draft). But stockpiling young talent is the way to go when rebuilding. Some of them will pan out.

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Jul 17, 2009 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is all good stuff

You make the key point that the Francis trade and buyout achieved two things: 1) getting rid of Zach Randolph and his onerous contract; and 2) getting rid of Francis. He was never in the plans and never fit the team culture. The trade accomplished salary cap relief; the buyout did not.

It should be noted that it is helpful to have a multi-bazillionaire owner with the willingness to cover these kinds of things. K9 might have been bought out three years ago if the Kings ownership had pockets that deep. Not that the Maloofs are struggling in any sense that ordinary people are, but there does seem to be a difference between them and Paul Allen.

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Jul 18, 2009 2:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This was nice reading from a Blazer fan perspective.

However, if you read on Blazers edge, you’d know that you have evaluated the Blazers talent all wrong:

Bayless = bust
Oden = bust
Rudy = too skinny
Batum = too young
Webster = not Chris Paul
Travis = too inconsistent
Aldridge = too soft
Blake = too white

Disaster looms.

by raoulduke on Jul 17, 2009 6:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

LOL

When I rule the world, everyone will know how to use Excel.

by jscot on Jul 17, 2009 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thank you! I was getting tired of all the Blazer Fanboy Love

as a poster said recently, in the wake of Hedo doing us a tremendous favor and taking a contract in Canada, “54 wins is nothing to be proud of”

"its tough to play with one eye, unless you're a pirate." Delonte West
"una canasta a Pau en la cara" Rudy

by Honka Playboy on Jul 18, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's a nice line Honka

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jul 18, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry about being off topic

but did you manage the Court Rivals team “Honka Playboys?” I was Alvin Holbrook, with the power forward “Jason Thompson.”

"Greed is the inventor of injustice as well as the current enforcer." - Julian Casablancas

by submison on Jul 19, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I actually agree to a point

Without scoring big on the BRoy pick the others are questionable. Talented yes, but are they championship pieces? Too soon to tell.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Jul 20, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Portland rebuilded their team just like any other team but

the only main difference was NO BAD CHARACTER GUYS. off court chemistry is on court chemistry. i think ur franchise should adopt that as well.

"shaq and zach randolph have the same trainer... "

best one liner i ever heard.

by bowdown on Jul 17, 2009 7:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

rebuilt*

i feel like a dumbass

"shaq and zach randolph have the same trainer... "

best one liner i ever heard.

by bowdown on Jul 17, 2009 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tyreke Evans

He drove somebody who participated in a shooting and saw it all happen. That’s bad character if you ask me.

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jul 17, 2009 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep trade him

Maybe we can turn him into someone like a Ricky Davis!

by propane on Jul 17, 2009 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes!

Ricky Davis Jr is just whom I want!

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jul 18, 2009 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd for truth

No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Jul 18, 2009 11:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seconded

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Jul 18, 2009 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn't agree more.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.

by Aykis16 on Jul 18, 2009 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tis the truth

Also, want Beno? He’s free to a good home.

by propane on Jul 18, 2009 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.
Start posting about the Kings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

200751153242283_small
That was then...
Spaceshaolinninja_small
NCAA Hoops Preview from the Kings' Perspective
Zebulon_small
Jason Thompson, Foul Machine
Eastern_logs_small
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Week 3
Old_logo_gif_small
Pookeyguru's Salary Cap FAQ

Recent FanPosts

Eastern_logs_small
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Week 4
Tyreke_yahoo_small
The League is Catching Up to Jason Thompson
Small
Spencer Hawes's failing grade
Small
Searching for a backup center
Small
If the Kings Lose Tonight it's All My Fault...
S5000963_small
Break Down of New Possible Trade
___small
Kings Remain Active in Trade Talks

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Local Sponsors


Editor

Loofie_small Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Authors

Banana2_small Exhibit G