Just Say Noc
I get it. The excitement. The rush. The...high.
I understand where you're coming from. Much like Ailene Voisin, you yearn -- nay, ACHE -- for a sexier version of the Kings.
You look up and down the roster, trying fill out the positions. Everything looks alright, or at least appears to have the potential to be alright, except for one spot. The same spot that we're supposedly over-stacked with players at -- small forward.
In a panicked attempt to plug this roster spot with something more, um, well, sexy -- you race to ESPN's trade machine and immediately engage in trades that give Nocioni away for something, ANYTHING, resembling a roster upgrade. Whether it's at PF, C, SG, SF, who cares!?! Upon distraction, you begin to entertain the idea of pawning Beno off on the last GM in the NBA who, for whatever reason, has no idea that Beno is not a starting-quality PG in this league. Ha-ha! Take that sucker!
Next, K9 (Woof!) is thrown in the mix, and before you know it, we're unloading KTEC to CHI for Noah and Hinrich (a minor coup no doubt), Noc is going to wherever, with Beno tagging along, and we're in cap space heaven.
The Kings are sexy, baby, yeah!
But it's only a quick fix. Soon, you'll be chasing the dragon again, my friend.Time for an intervention. As a trade machine addict, I know about that which I am speaking about (purposely redundantly written sentence).
Look, I want to get rid of Beno as bad as the next guy or girl (or Jamie Lee Curtis). And I want to parlay KTEC into Bosh or D-Wade (or Jamie Lee Curtis), too. But, before we start log-jamming the trade machine website and bemoaning the contract of Nocioni, while declaring Casspi or Greene the starter at SF, we need to examine what we're really looking at; a young Kings roster with some potential, but also in need of a lot of leadership and veteran presence. Thus, if you're going to party all night with the Trade Machine and wake up with a "GM hat" hangover, please consider the following when adding Noc's name into the equation.
I've seen much made of Noc's "bad" contract as of late and a strong push to, well, push the guy out of town. However, very few of those trades bring back anything resembling an upgrade at SF, with the assumption being that we can just roll Greene, Casspi or even Garcia out at the 3 spot.
Well, first of all, none of those guys would be better at the SF than Noc right now. Noc is a 5-year vet w/ a career average of 12 points and 5 boards. His best year resulted in a PER of over 16. Last year was substantially worse than that, at just over 12. Still, I don't see (especially after summer league) Greene doing particularly better, and Casspi is unproven as of yet.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see one of those guys earn the starting job by being better than Noc and becoming a more complete player. I'm just not convinced it's remotely close to being ready to happen yet. And I'm not advocating that we keep Noc no matter what. If the right trade comes up, pull the trigger. It could be the best thing for all parties involved (especially if rumblings about Noc not wanting to be around for a rebuild are true). But, we need a player to take his place. One who will (hopefully) be better, and also one who can provide some experience.
Which leads me to my second point. Noc better addresses the needs surrounding leadership and veteran presence than the other guys currently on our roster at SF. Not that Noc is notorious for commanding his teammates, but the guy displays hustle. He's been in the league five years and is still diving on the court for loose balls. He's still a physical player. It seems Casspi might follow in that mold, but we simply don' know yet. Regardless, neither Greene nor Casspi can bring that veteran presence or the "been-there-done-that" calming influence that is sometimes needed throughout the season. Especially on a young squad that is bound to run into growing pains. One need only look at Portland's desperate attempt to bring in anything resembling a veteran presence to confirm my point. POR is very talented, but they also recognize that to get over the hump, a veteran's presence is necessary.
Lastly, while Noc's contract is bigger than most of our other guys, it's still not that bad. I don't understand the rationale that his contract is grossly out of proportion to what he brings to the floor. Maybe he's a little overpaid, but compared to the rest of the league's bad contracts, it's not too difficult to stomach. Besides, while he'll make about $7.5M this season, his contract declines each remaining season, and the last year is a team option. It's not bad at all, really.
Would I love to get a stud SF on the roster? Duh. But, my point is reading some of these trade suggestions (in which Dalembert is curiously the flavor of the month -- at $25M over 2 years -- um, no thanks), it seems a lot of fans are disgruntled with the notion of Noc and his contract.
Until we can work a sensible trade for a better SF or Greene/Casspi demonstrate that they're ready to explode into a legit, consistent player, Noc represents our best option to serve as the anchor at a "stacked" small forward position, and to be a guy that can talk from an experienced viewpoint when needed.
Like it or not, for now we're married to the situation.
Maybe it's not the sexiest option, but that's marriage sometimes...or so I've heard. I've also heard, "if you can't be with the one you love, then love the one you're with." Either way, (and this is stating the obvious, but I feel it's worth stating given what I've seen lately) a trade involving Noc has to bring back something that does more than increase the amount of sex appeal the Kings have.
This is a basketball team. Not a late night movie on Cinemax.
(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
57 comments
|
13 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I hate you
I was this close to finagling Kevin Durant from the #*$&%@, then you go and post this.
(recd)
Victory is tasty.
So, what are we supposed to do between now & Oct.?
Noc could be the defensive glue that holds our young team together, but at what price?
He makes more than Cisco, Donte, & Casspi put together. He’s the 3rd highest paid contract on the team. That’s the dollars end of the business.
Unless your going to trade a young prospect of which we only have JT, Donte, Casspi who else is there. And, a trade must be made. We have 3 PG’s, 3 SF’s, 2 SG’s(martin & Cisco), 3 PF’s (including Thomas) and 1 Center. Let me repeat this we have 1 Center.
I’ll avoid getting in the the (Ike/May) debate because I don’t believe JT has or will have the low post game to backup at Center this year. Plus, I’d rather see JT learn how to play PF before we start pushing him in the Center spot.
Garcia is our backup SG & a BYC so getting a Center by trading him creates more problems and isn’t easily done. Beno is a serviceable backup with a unfavorable contract. Thomas, well no one wants to pay his contract until after the trade deadline. And, that leaves use with Noc or Donte or our cap space.
Something is going to have to go if we’re going to pick up a serviceable backup Center. And, if Noc has to go, then I guess our young team will have to rely on the coaching staff for their leadership until one of the players steps up.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
I don't think the team should be averse to trading Nocioni or Garcia
But not to shed salary. That should be reserved for the Beno Udrih’s of the world.
Nocioni and Garcia are quite likely to actually earn their money – and they both bring a bit of redass on the court. Bottom line is, they are reasonably paid for what you can get out of them. And Noc’s contract gets more reasonable as we go along, meaning you should be able to move him down the road if you really feel the need.
I prefer Garcia to Noc for 2 reasons
Noc is easier to trade this year due to his declining salary for the next 2 seasons after this, and Garcia has 4 more years (with a team option for the 4th year) after this season. Plus, with Cisco being BYC it’s going to make it hard to trade him.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Compelling argument
Noc is a 5-year vet w/ a career average of 12 points and 5 boards. His best year resulted in a PER of over 16. Last year was substantially worse than that, at just over 12. Still, I don’t see (especially after summer league) Greene doing particularly better, and Casspi is unproven as of yet.
Translation: his best year was slightly above average and now he’s a below-average performer and heading downhill, but we don’t know what the kids will do, so we better hang on to him so we can be respectably crappy.
Repeat after me: youth movement, youth movement, youth movement.
Give the kids a chance. They can’t be much worse, they’re a lot cheaper, and they at least have the potential to get better.
Noc will probably get worse before he gets better, and he won’t be around when the Kings get better anyway.
Expendable. Next.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Jul 18, 2009 2:32 PM PDT reply actions
Noc
The minute that you can unload him for expiring, pull the trigger. If it costs a game or two this year, the extra cap space next year will more than make up for it.
I agree with portions of the post, PK, especially as it pertains to trading anchors (Noc) for potentially bigger anchors (Dalembert). And as long as Noc is better than Greene or Casspi, he should get the starting nod.
Rec’d for the entertaining read.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
I agree with Section
Liked your post, disagree with a few of your points. Noc should definitely be the starting SF next year, but this is a young team. I think if we can trade Noc for a need (expiring contracts, a SF or a C with less years than Noc on their contract), we’ll be better off in the long run, even if Noc makes us better now.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.
I will rec you
Look, I want to get rid of Beno as bad as the next guy or girl (or Jamie Lee Curtis).
Especially for the hermaphrodite joke. I laughed… it was pretty darn funny.
Don't get it twisted...
I’m not saying hang onto Noc for dear life. If something comes along that makes sense for the team, do it.
What I’m saying is that:
a) I think Noc’s intangibles (the hustle, diving plays, toughness) are being underrated.
b) He should NOT be lumped into the Beno-KTEC group of underperforming-overpaid players.
c) As of right now, he’s the best option at SF.
d) You need some veteran influence on the floor, not just coming from the bench via the coaching staff. This is important for the growth of a young team, as it helps with identity and attitude.
e) Don’t be in such a rush to unload the guy that you take back another bad contract (i.e., Dalembert). Worst-case scenario, Noc does his thing (serviceably) until Greene or Casspi are ready to take over.
f) When using Trade Machine, try to create deals that make sense for both teams and take the Kings’ needs (especially for veteran players, ball-movement, cap space and the depth-chart) into consideration.
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jul 18, 2009 3:11 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
As Section and Aykis said, I might not be in 100% agreement with every point, but overall it was a good read. Good humor at the expense of poor Jamie, good rationale on slowing the freakout.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
Nice post, rec'd.
The Noce conundrum is that the Kings would like to lose his contract, but they are really hard up for floor leaders right now. Noce may be their best option in that respect, which is not saying much, but the guy does bring some leadership/intangibles. That is provided he doesn’t go postal over the fact that he is not in the long-term plans of a team for whom losing twice as many games as they win will be considered a major improvement.
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Jul 18, 2009 5:11 PM PDT reply actions
I say play it out
right now Noc is still he best player at the position, end of story. The way that the top tier teams are going for it right now see who feels they could use him and go from there. He is not a problem contract like KTEC or Beno due to the fact he contribrutes to the team. In the middle of July there should be no huge rush since free agency is still taking place and rosters are not set. It will work out in time, but until then I will appriciate a player busting their ass and hoping it rubs off.
Finding positives in a 65 loss season since 2009
Like your sig mayne
One of the true originals.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Doofus alert
I’m terrible sorry, what exactly does KTEC stand for?
I think I have the first two letters figured out.
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Jul 18, 2009 9:36 PM PDT reply actions
Ah
Intuitively obvious that
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Jul 18, 2009 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't forget
Noc was a a pretty hot commodity when we aquired him. I remember Amick saying there were a few teams that were pushing to grab him. I don’t know what the kings would yeild in return, but the thing is that Noc has some sort of value, and if the Kings ever decide to move him, it wouldn’t be that hard. Sure you might not get a young prospect, but you won’t get a bad contract in return. He is a skilled, tough, and atheltic garbage player. There aren’t too many players with his skill and athletisim that are willing to do the dirty work on the court.
Phil Jackson, after treatment for a kidney stone "When the anesthesiologist leaned over me, he said "We named your kidney stone Kobe because it's not passing."
If we wanna move Noc, move him at the trade deadline
Too many teams are desperate to stop the Lakers, Cavs & Magic that we may end up with a seriously good offer. Plus, we’ll see where we are at in the season — we might be half-way decent and have no intention of actually moving him (unless someone gives us the farm).
Moving at the speed of molasses.
Agreed
Noc is definitely the type of player that could help push a good team over the top. Given the arms race this summer, there might be a few desperate contenders at the trade deadline. Here’s hoping somebody overpays for him in youth and/or expiring contracts.
Also don't forget
that his stats might be inflated a bit (a la John Salmons) while playing on our crappy team until the trade deadline. I could see his stock rising by February.
In the mean time I’m glad to have him around to show young Casspi and Greene the ropes. It sounds like we are hoping for Casspi to be like a more talented version of Nocioni – meaning the toughness, hustle, and grit with more rim-rocking athleticism. Who better to teach him than the man himself?
by CDinSD on Jul 19, 2009 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed. Boston and Orlando might be particularly interested.
After all, they have to go through Lebron. And, while Noce isn’t the LBJ stopper, he’ll certainly hack, bump and foul LBJ into (at least) one bad game.
There can only be one Noce!
Very nice post, Phuture
rec’d
Nocioni should be considered a welcome addition to the roster. To re-iterate your commetns; he has these good qualities: He provides experience, hustle and talent. He is the starting 3 for this Kings team. The negatives to him are – he is not “young”, he is a bit slow and unathletic, his talents are unspectacular, he would not be a starter on a contending team, his contract is just a bit on the higher side (even with his declining pay scale) for an unspectacular player.
The item you have avoided in your assessment: He has expressed unhappiness on being on this team (a surprisingly unprofessional display for a foreign player).
Let’s just address the last negative:
- he has expressed unhappiness on being on this team – and that is what I believe has prompted the spark to ignite the “trade Noce” flame. Can there be a bigger turn off to a fan than rejection? Heck no. Are most athletes so self centered as to bite the hand that feeds. Obviously, because it happens too darn much. Most foreign players have had a tempering of the ego cultured into of them before they get here. Not unlike Supersizing and prostate cancer, all media access superEgo is an American byproduct. Nocioni has unfortunately acquired a touch of “diarrhea of the mouth” after his trade to Sacramento.. Ev eryone knows that being publicly unhappy lowers trade value and makes one more difficult to move, but id trumps common sense. So be it. I expect that over the next few years, as the Kings pass from cellar dweller to mediocre that the climb out of the basement will be a test of Nocioni’s professional attitude, if he stays a King. I am hopeful that his comments were a “speaking out of turn” event and will cease and desist. This summer and pre-season will give ample opportunity to either cry out again or get his feces cohesive. I (hope and) expect the latter because the resaon to have a veteran is to keep this young team focused and directed. If Nocioni is unhappy and keeps to himself (think the opposite of the ultimate Kings teammate – Vlade Divac) than he needs to go.
by betweentheeyes on Jul 19, 2009 10:54 AM PDT reply actions
Just to clarify a bit.
True, Noce did speak out of turn during the first few weeks of his Kings tenure. But, if I remember correctly, he was angry because he felt the Kings were not committed to winning and were, instead, committed to the “bottom line”.
I can’t blame the Maloofs. I mean, they are in this for the money (right?).
But would you seriously blame an ultra-competitive athlete for being mad that his team doesn’t seem committed to winning? (take note, I said “seem” meaning the opposite could be true and Noce just misunderstood the situation or jumped to the wrong conclusions.)
The guy takes losing badly. But I’ve seen him ecstatic after holding bronze medals and I think he can accept losing when he knows the team gave everything it had. its the “Not even trying” part that seems to really irritate him.
There can only be one Noce!
I tried because I thought I must be missing something
but I couldn’t find anything to disagree with you about.
We really are in the silly season, just because it works on the trade machine doesn’t mean it works. Maybe I missed your point but I didn’t read that you want to hang on to Noc at any cost, only that it makes no sense to trade him for no or low value just to get rid of his k.
He came in mid season and was tossed into a chaotic situation. He’s got some game, he’s the type of player the MLE was designed for. With an experienced coach who will bring in an established offensive system, strong staff and the ability to go through camp and practice with his team mates I expect Noc to play to his career averages.
There may be a trade to be made at the deadline, maybe not but all the things that are wrong with the Kings are not Noc’s fault. He and Cisco bring some of our best defense, such as it is, he hustles, makes some plays and will likely be one of the best players on the team this season. There will be a time to trade him but that time is not now and unless we can get expirings or good young players it doesn’t make any sense to force trades now. Good post.
"We are in the business of kicking butt and business is very, very good." - Charles Barkley
Stop looking at the SF position and look at the big picture.
Phuture make some excellent points as to why the Kings still need Noc.
Until we can work a sensible trade for a better SF or Greene/Casspi demonstrate that they’re ready to explode into a legit, consistent player, Noc represents our best option to serve as the anchor at a “stacked” small forward position, and to be a guy that can talk from an experienced viewpoint when needed.
Then there’s
Besides, while he’ll make about $7.5M this season, his contract declines each remaining season, and the last year is a team option. It’s not bad at all, really.
There is no question that no one has stepped up to beat Noc out of the starting job. And, he does offer experience and talent for a reasonably priced contract. And, I see no need as of this time to trade him, to upgrade the talent at SF. The point that people are missing is that if Noc were to get injured, we still have options. Cisco has started at the 3 and done well. Casspi although a NBA rookie, has played professional ball at the highest levels of European basketball. And, Donte is working hard to up his game and has already shown improved defense, rebounding and shot blocking.
Now, what happens if Hawes gets injured. Even if we sign (Ike or May or Powe) we still have a poor 4/5 rotation. JT has no low post game and didn’t shine at the 5 in SL, let alone the regular season. Brockman’s undersized with no offense, & still hasn’t proven he can rebound at the NBA level. And, none of the other prospective Bigs, can play the 5. So, we start JT out of position at the 5, and when he gets tired or gets into foul trouble, what do we do?
WE NEED ANOTHER CENTER. And, Noc, as has been pointed out, has talent and value with a reasonable contract. Which makes him our best tradeable commodity. Yes, we may get weaker at the 3. And, we’ll miss his leadership. But, at least at the 3 we have acceptable options. We have NO OPTIONS at the 5.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
You're telling me if you can dump Noc's contract for a salary cap dump
You don’t at least entertain the thought if not follow through?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure if anyone is advocating that point.
I’m certainly not. When I talk about a “sensible” trade, it means one in which we address team needs and do not take on a nasty contract for the sake of getting rid of Noc. I would consider a salary dump, because that address team needs by opening up more money for free agency. But, after watching Portland try and fail (repeatedly) to get something out of free agency this summer, I’m a little worried about what we can actually acquire.
The “problem” with Noc’s contract and a trade involving him is this: a) his contract is not hideously out of proportion to what he brings to the court to the point that you could label it a “bad” contract, but; b) it’s high enough that you could label it a bad contract because he’s not performing well enough to enable the Kings to tack Beno’s contract onto a deal involving Noc. For example no one is going to make a trade for Noc AND Beno straight up.
Thus, the result is that if we deal Noc, it most likely has to be a straight-deal involving only Noc, or one in which we must attach KTEC, thereby diminishing our return on a valuable expiring contract (or perhaps we’d have to attach one of our coveted young guys…if it’s the right deal, fine, but…). If it’s a straight-Noc deal, we’re likely not going to get something that is much better as far as addressing team needs in return (unless it’s expiring salary, which would be ok, or a bad contract coming back our way, which would suck).
Hence, the co-noc-drum we find ourselves in. He’s good for us, but not great, and he’s not likely to bring back equal value or talent in a trade on his own. We can’t package him with Al B. Tross (the B stands for Beno), and he’d likely take away from the value of KTEC if he were packaged into the deal.
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jul 19, 2009 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Holy Shizz...
I seriously just realized that I wrote “KT” and “value” in the same sentence! How long have we all been waiting to be able to legitimately make that argument!?!
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jul 19, 2009 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions
That's why I think dumping Noc in a salary dump (I think the Clippers is a wise destination for him, but there are others too)
And finding a way to attack Beno in any trade involving Kenny Thomas is the way this team will go.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Um
I hope you mean attach Beno in any K9 trade.
Attacking him is kind of uncalled-for.
The draft lottery has reinforced my belief that there are not enough bad words in the English language.
by LeaguePassAddict on Jul 19, 2009 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes Madam Editor
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Uncalled for? Sure. Understandable? Definitely.
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jul 20, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions
I share HighTops concerns
We are horribly, desperately thin at the 4/5. I don’t want to take on some crappy contract to address the problem but I also don’t want our young players to be forced to play out of position, to be wretchedly overmatched by PF after PF or Center after Center – I don’t think they’ll learn much in that scenario thats worth learning.
Q: Would you take on Kaman’s contract for Noce’s? The upside, if he’s healthy he’s a true physical post player, the downside – IF he’s healthy.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
The Center situation:
I really am becoming mystified as to what the hell we’re going to do about our lack of a backup C. The only FAs I’m really interested in right now are Sessions, Kleiza, Lee and Robinson. Those are young enough and proven enough that I feel they could have a lingering role on the team. Anyone else seems to be overpriced, not a good fit a stop-gap measure.
If we’re going to add players at a substantial cost, I want players who will be a part of the long term. I don’t mind a temporary fix as long as it comes at a bargain.
Regarding Kaman, 3 years and approx $35M is little hard to stomach if he’s going to be the back-up 5. It’d make sense if he were the starter, but that puts the team’s long-term plans (and Hawes’ development) on the shelf. If Kaman is a better fir for us, then maybe I’d do it. But, even if that were the case, my preference would be to save what little cap space we have in order to become a MAJOR player at the trade deadline. I think the players who will be available then would be a better fit, better talent, and better plan of attack for the Kings.
Granted, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, but Kaman is not in our hand, er, our hand is not in Kaman’s bush. I mean…well, you know what I mean!
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jul 20, 2009 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe Hawes needs to back up again for a while
Kaman would be very tradable if he’s reasonably healthy, Hawes is also tradable.
Anyway, I’m not going to the mat on the Kaman idea but he really plays aroud the rim and is great at it. We desperately need a guy, either a starter or back-up in a signifiant role who can do that. Every good team does.
Probably any trade for Kaman would have to include Hawes though. Would you give him up if the the Clippers . . . . (woof!)?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Jul 21, 2009 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions
$34 million over the next three years
for a career 10 and 8 guy whose only good season was in his contract year? Thank you, no.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Not to mention games missed over the past five seasons
19, 4, 7, 26, 51.
Durability? Not.
Given the price tag and the red flags, there is absolutely no way that a guy like Kaman fits into the Kings rebuilding plans. Or at least I hope not.
From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.
by My Losing Season on Jul 21, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Not to mention that it makes absolutely NO sense to include Hawes in the deal
when the whole point was to add an additional center to the roster. At this point, I wouldn’t even do Kaman for KT straight-up, because I think KTEC can get us more at the deadline. And if he can’t then no biggie. Kaman’s bad contract will still be there.
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jul 21, 2009 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Thats what she said.
"It would be my honor to be your new stepfather."
by PhutureKings on Jul 21, 2009 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions
how about this???
Was wondering if Noc (or Garcia) can be used in the Marques Daniels stand off that Boston and Indiana are having…Haven’t looked at all the contracts involved but,
Sac trades Noc (Garcia)
Boston trades Tony Allen + draft picks (?)
Indiana S&Ts Daniels
Sacramento gets Tony Allen + picks (?)
Boston get Daniels
Indiana gets Noc (Garcia)
this would clean up the logjam at the SF position, give us Allen to be the backup SG behind Martin and lose a long-term contact in either Noc or Garcia.
Trade the starting 3 or the first back up 3 off the bench
Noc or Garcia for a career bench warmer who gave the worst performance of the Celtics run against the Magic in Tony Allen. Oh, and a late round first rounder in a future draft.
I don’t have enough thumbs to turn this down in the manner it deserves.
by betweentheeyes on Jul 28, 2009 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Man, u make it sound like the Kings are contenders........
so you don’t think its a good move to thin out our crowded SF position and move a 4 year contract for an expiring contract of a guy better suited to fill the back up SG spot plus a late first round pick?
Yea, Tony Allen isn’t the most talented guard out there. However, u want to judge a guy based upon the entire 13 mins he played in the Orlando series? Can I guy get warmed up and into the flow of the game before u start labelling him a scrub? During the season, he did average 20 mins, 8 pts and 48% shooting. Now compared that to Noc’s and Garcia stats in Sacramento which are almost exactly the same (30 mins, 12 pts and 44% shooting) and you can see that Allen is not that large of a drop off.
Now, for that late first round draft pick. Let’s see, Casspi was a late first round draft pick in the last draft. Courtney Lee was a late first round last year. As with any draft pick, its all hit or miss anyways.
Lastly, as we near the trading deadline which do you think will be better for GP to work with: Noc and his 4 year contract or an expiring $2.5 mil deal in Allen?
for a straight salary dump I can't argue
from a talent stand point, no legs.
I think that Nocioni has the potential, since you like to invoke that hopeful dream, to be a true leader for the this somewhat rudderless squad.
wish there was someone besides Tony Allen.
by betweentheeyes on Jul 29, 2009 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions
meet ya half way....
Remember that our player will be going to Indiana in this deal. Larry Bird seems to like those hard working, limited athletically players. Seemed like Noc would be a kind of guy that fits that system AKA Jeff Foster, Hansborough, etc.
But what if it was Garcia going instead of Noc? Garcia’s contract isn’t exactly a gem to work with (from a GM’s point of view). Would you be able to stomach that kind of deal?
Unless they pay Daniels a lot of money
salary doesn’t match
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.-1984 George Orwell.
Not really...
If they can get Daniels to accept the same amount of a contract as Allen’s is ($2.5 mil for next year), then it works because Indiana is under the salary cap and can take on the extra of either Garcia or Noc’s contracts, thus off course creating a trade exception.
Right now, I think the most Boston can offer Daniels is $1.9 mil so this makes a little more sense. Just gotta get Indiana willing to buy off on it.
Plus, is Indiana still on the hook for....
the remainder of Tinsley’s $5 mil a year contract if he resigns with another team? I don’t think so. Heard that Knicks are looking at possibly adding him.
whoops...those were his buyout numbers...YIKES!
Sorry, misread that the $5 mil a year was the salary hit for the BUYOUT of his contract. Man, wish some1 would pay me $10 mil not to play basketball for them.
Larry Brown and Chris Webber hold the record
about $40M each for not playing or not coaching
by betweentheeyes on Jul 30, 2009 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions
I would be in favor of this
I’ve liked Daniels since his Mavs days. He brings something that we dont have while helping us deal with some redunancy at the SF position. And we get a late 1st rounder! I couldnt care less about Tony Allen tho.

by 


















