Sactown Royalty: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

Building around a SUPERSTAR. Can the Kings do this?


This is my first "Fan Post" here, so be gentle. 


Everyone knows that the most conventional and historically best way to build a championship contender is to build around a bonafide SUPERSTAR. One of those top 10-15 best players in the entire league.

My question is this: Can the Kings do this with any one of our core group of young players. I include our core group of young players as:
1) Tyreke Evans
2) Spencer Hawes
3) Jason Thompson
4) Donte Greene
5) Omri Casspi

Let's get started in evaluating the potential that each one of these players has and see if any of them have "SUPERSTAR" potential, the bona fide kind. 

Star-divide


1) Tyreke Evans - This guy is the consensus pick amongst 'conventional wisdom' to become a bona fide superstar. He has the ability to CREATE for himself as well as teammates, perhaps not in the traditional sense. His strengths are attacking the basket, his physical size(both offensive and defensively he should have an advantage against smaller guards) and his ball handling skills. His weaknesses are shooting, shooting and shooting. 

The good news: Shooting can be improved with time. It's the most easily correctable weakness, especially when you have Pete Carrill on your staff. Also, his ability to finish and take advantage of the opposition with his physical attributes won't go away.

The bad news: He's only 19 and probably years away from realizing his potential. For a franchise starving for success, this could be a long-term fix for us. 

Conclusion: Evans definitely has superstar potential. He may be a good player, sooner-than-later and I'm a big fan, I think SUPERSTAR status is at least 4-5 years away for this kid. I don't see him being LeBron-eque or even Wade-esque in the sense that he brings team success to his franchise at a rather young age. But the kid WILL, IMO be at worst a perennial all-star caliber player by the time he's 24 years old. 

Spencer Hawes - The ENIGMA. He has all the skill in the world. He even has some favorable physical attributes. The key is harnessing those skills and attributes to maximize himself as a player.

The Good: He's smart, crafty and better on defense than anyone gives him credit for. I think for Spencer the sky's the limit. The key is for him to elevate the CEREBRAL game. If he becomes half as crafty as Vlade was, then Hawes has All-Star written all over him.

The Bad: The same thing that may be his virtue, may also be his vice. Just because you CAN hit the three, doesn't mean you SHOULD hit the three. I think that statement is critical for Hawes, development as a player, and not just in the realm of shot selection.

Conclusion: I think THIS roster, may NEED him to hit the three to be successful overall, but what I mean is that Hawes needs to operate within a system. With Evans' lack of shooting ability, it may be necessary for Hawes to pull the opposing Center AWAY from the basket for Evans to be effective at getting to the rim. Hawes CAN be a star in this league, however, this year will determine if a team can be built AROUND him as a player. 

Jason Thompson - What's not to like? The kid is skilled, athletic and hustles like Michael Smith of old. He's got two-way potential. When I say two-way potential, I mean he could go either way in terms of making an all-NBA team (probably 3rd team) on either offense or defense. 

The good: He hustles, he's passionate and he's versatile. Thompson can play inside, he can play outside. He can play defense, he can play offense. He can play the PF position or the Center position effectively. He's VERSATILE. The key is to figure out, what is he BEST at, and what is he BEST at to COMPLEMENT this roster. I think he needs to focus on the defensive end. He has more potential defensively than Hawes does IMO. He's already got a fairly polished offensive game for a young big man. He can shoot, he gets lots of put-backs and tip-ins and he rebounds well(especially on the offensive side of the ball.

The bad: He out-paces the game. I think that's the MAJOR trait he needs to improve on. Pacing himself. This is the reason I think he makes silly fouls and gets himself out of the game. He needs to understand when he's beat and let it go. We can't have him sitting the bench in foul trouble each game. This is why I think his DEFENSE should be his focal point. His offense will come. He can hit the 18 footer, get a couple put back, hit some free throws, out-run his opponent on a fast-break finish, nail a shot with the clock winding down. He'll get his 15 points a game. But the CRITICAL aspect for Shock is to SHUT DOWN the opposition best BIG MAN. He can guard the shooter(Rasheed's, Mehmets', Dirk's, West's of the league) he has that ABILITY. He can also guard the post-men( Howards, Duncans's etc) he has that ABILITY. The question is, will he put it together.

In conclusion: Thompson has star ability, but I don't think he'll ever be an all-star in this league, but rather a SUPER SOLID big man who helps you win games

Donte Greene - What trumps an engima? Whatever it is, that's Donte Greene. He OOZES potential. In fact, I wonder if it's border-line institutionalize-me if I say this, "Donte Greene has the MOST potential for superstardom of any one player on our roster". Is that a false statement? I dunno, but my opinion is that while he may have that potential, I also fear he's the least likely to realize that potential of anyone of our core. 

The good - He's young. He fun. He's cocky. Pete Carrill is a coach over him.! He's got the POTENTIAL mind-set of a star. Similar to a Ron Artest without the CRAZY. If you move two steps from the 'insanity' that is Ron to the 'Sanity' realm of things, I think you have Donte' Greene's mindset. He's tall, athletic and can 'supposedly shoot;.

The Bad - He can 'supposedly shoot'(as I haven't seen it in the NBA, YET. Is as RAW as they come. And doesn't understand the game of basketball.....yet. I say yet, because I have faith that coach and Westphal will help this kid 'figure it out'.

Conclusion - Donte' may be the biggest CONUNDRUM of any one of our prospects, I think he has the ability to become a SUPERSTAR player. It's mostly cerebral, as I think the tools are there Phsycially, skillfully and emotionally. I think the emotional make-up of a player is what drives the good to greatness in the NBA, i.e Larry Bird, Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson. 

Omri Casspi - It's hard to say here. I know so little about him first-hand. So I'll leave it inconclusive. However, with what I have read, he seems to be a typical Petrie-find in a late first. Not a star, not a bust. He could be a VERY important piece to the puzzle, but not the center-stone of that puzzle. I could be wrong, and hope that I am towards the STAR 'spectrum'. But that's what I think. He could be a perfect complement to this roster as his play-making, rebounding and tenacity are sorely needed to complement this roster.

Poll
Of our 'CORE YOUTH', who's MOST likely to transform into a superstar on our roster that we can build around?
Tyreke Evans
169 votes
Spencer Hawes
6 votes
Jason Thompson
8 votes
Donte' Greene
7 votes
Omri Casspi
3 votes

193 votes | Poll has closed

(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)

5 recs  |  Comment 56 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Sactown Royalty

Size Matters: Lakers 106, Kings 99

Mar 2010 by Ziller - 127 comments

Preview: Lakers at Kings

Mar 2010 by Ziller - 128 comments

Blazers 110, Kings 94

Mar 2010 by Ziller - 69 comments

Around SB Nation

Game 66 Preview: Kings vs. Blazers

Mar 2010 from Blazersedge - 30 comments

Saturday Morning Roundup

Mar 2010 from Mavs Moneyball - 4 comments

Comments

Display:

Evans has the best chance at becoming a superstar.

I still believe in Ryan Garko...........

by 49er16 on Sep 23, 2009 1:23 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I would have still given you the rec

even if it wasn’t your first post. Nicely done.

Without a minute of real NBA playtime ‘Reke looks like the easy pick for future superstardom and can possibly be the the piece we need to rebuild the franchise around, but man, it’s early yet. I love JT and agree with you and TZ that he should focus on his defensive game as the vehicle to elevate his entire game and value to the team. I agree that JT probably isn’t an All Star but he at least has the drive to turn every bit of potential into ability and above average career stats.

Donté, Donté,Donté. I think it was either TZ or Section who labeled é the poster child for unrealized potential. As great of a coach as Pete Carrill is, even coachie can’t teach heart.

"We are in the business of kicking butt and business is very, very good." - Charles Barkley

by Bluejohn on Sep 23, 2009 1:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You claiming Donté has no

héart? Not sure I get that one.

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Sep 23, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ya if you list Donte's weaknesses

I wouldn’t put “heart” on that list.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.

by Aykis16 on Sep 23, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, I should have been clearer

What I meant to say was that I don’t believe that he has that drive to be the absolute best that super stars have. I think with a little time and maturity and consistent training he can be be a better pro baller but I don’t see the “want to” in his personality that the superstars, All -Stars and elites have. I don’t believe it can be taught.

"We are in the business of kicking butt and business is very, very good." - Charles Barkley

by Bluejohn on Sep 23, 2009 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How can a kid

who has just completed his first NBA campaign after only one actually unspectacular year at Syracuse already have “unrealized potential”?

Lower their expectations and rise to met them

by left hand on Sep 23, 2009 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Has to be Tyreke...

or we are screwed. Superstars are found in the top of draft — almost exclusively (particularly after every team started scouting the HS and foreign talent – thus nobody slips a Kobe or Dirk past the lottery). If it isn’t Tyreke, it better be our top choice next year.

by longtimelistenerfirsttimecaller on Sep 23, 2009 4:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted for Tyreke

He is the most likely to become a superstar. Donte Greene does, however, have the most potential, as Smills mentioned. He reminds me a lot of Anthony Randolph in that we can see his potential but we just hope he learns to harness it. Luckily for us we have a coach/front office that is better prepared to develop younger players than Anthony Randolph has in Oakland

www.mancancook.net

by vfettke on Sep 23, 2009 4:20 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Anthony Randolph

will also not be an NBA superstar.

I dunno, maybe I’m missing something here. Maybe we’re talking apples and oranges, but by my definition “NBA superstar” means a star among stars; the creme de la creme. In other words, a player so eminent that he is counted among the top half dozen or so players in the league at any given time. So right now there’s LeBron, there’s Kobe, there’s uh, Dwight Howard. After that, perhaps Dwyane Wade, maaaaybe Chris Paul, and if you still wanna count Tim Duncan I wouldn’t argue the point, even though he’s not quite the player he was a season or two back. That’s it. That’s the entire list of current NBA superstars.

The next level below that, guys like Garnett, Nowitzki, Gasol, etc; . those are just regular, garden variety NBA stars.

Evans is the only name on this list who has a decent chance of reaching that kind of level; and he’s the only player on the Kings even remotely capable of attaining Superstar status.

"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)

by Mucho Moss on Sep 25, 2009 2:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you want to say Duncan is still an NBA superstar

Then I think you’d have to include Garnett and Nowitzki as well. Kevin Durant is probably going to be a superstar, and Anthony is on the brink as well.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.

by Aykis16 on Sep 25, 2009 7:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duncan has Superstar Emeritus status

And actually so does Shaq (cough).

TD’s true superstar days are past, and Shaq’s are WAY past. There may be a few others in that group, i.e., still playing and were once borderline superstar material (e.g., Garnett, Iverson, McGrady). I may be being a bit generous there.

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Sep 25, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Iverson was a superstar

He was Philadelphia for a few years and his MVP award and their success (he did take them to the NBA Finals) were well deserved. And it was mostly because of him.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.

by Aykis16 on Sep 25, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

right.

I gave Duncan Emeritus status (thanks for that phrase, MLS). With that one exception I excluded anyone who’s a “gonna be” or “a used to be”.

If all those guys are “Superstars” then the term becomes next to meaningless.

We could make it pretty simple really. LeBron is the Gold Standard. If a player is say, 75% of LeBron in terms of physical skill and ability, game impact, and cultural interest and visibility, then I’ll grant them NBA Superstar status.

Otherwise they’ll have to just settle for regular old stardom.

"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)

by Mucho Moss on Sep 25, 2009 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not only is Evans

the ONLY one either likely or with the potential to become a Superstar (unless this is not as lofty an aspiration as I think it is), he is simply the one the team WILL build around. The only way that changes is through some drastic change/addition to the roster via trade or draft.

Neither Donte’ Greene nor any other current King, nor Anthony Randolph, will become a Superstar. Some will turn out to be really good, even All-Star quality. Superstar?

Lower their expectations and rise to met them

by left hand on Sep 23, 2009 5:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree.

"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)

by Mucho Moss on Sep 25, 2009 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A note on JT

I think JT doesn’t know how to move his defender down low. He is quick and he often hustles and jukes his way into an open shot but he does so at the deficit of his balance, hoop vision, and shooting form and thus missed a lot of shots in close. He could use lessons in body contact, getting the defender to commit his feet and weight in one direction or another, making his defender lean on him, backing him up, knowing when to move quickly and knowing when to move forcefully. He should go take pummeling lessons from whoever is wrestling heavyweight for UCD.

Also, a note to SMills re: the picture next to your name. It is my impression that StR generally discourages overt political instigation. I think a hammer and sickle juxtaposed with an Obama campaign icon qualifies as such.

by BrooklynFan on Sep 23, 2009 5:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Spencer Hawes would approve.

of the avatar that is.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.

by Aykis16 on Sep 23, 2009 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So it's okay to have an Obama O as an avatar, but not Smills' version?

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Sep 26, 2009 7:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You pose a fair question

and I admit, I have my blind spots and my sensitivities and both help form my thresholds. Would an Obama O avatar have crossed my threshold for political instigation? Obviously it has not nor would a McCain Palin one. A Hitler mustachioed Bush one would have, just as Smills’s has, due to their striking and forceful symbolism. I am however not StR’s PC police. I speak for myself as a community member as I expect all others to do. In reviewing my own statements on the topic (i.e. this one, the one you questioned, and the one farther down) I see that I should have been more explicit in stating that my opinions on the matter belong only to me.

by BrooklynFan on Sep 27, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I definitely agree that Smills' avatar is worse than an Obama O

My problem is that I’ve often felt like people are much more tolerable of leftist politics here at StR, while getting up in arms at this. I don’t really think that’s fair. People shouldn’t just assume that everybody shares their politics, even if it may seem that way.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Sep 27, 2009 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What matters in what Smills91 thinks about politics?

Whoever brought up the politics should let it go, this is a Kings blog.

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.-1984 George Orwell.

by tomkanti on Sep 27, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

People just don't get upset about politics unless someone disagrees with them.

If people don’t like it, they can flag it, and action will be taken. Keep the politics off StR, even if you think everybody agrees with you. That’s my point.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Sep 27, 2009 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

“…Keep the politics off StR, even if you think everybody agrees with you.”

This makes sense, Jedi. Which is why if you were being consistent you would be against Sactown members wearing their politics on the sleeve of their avatars.

"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)

by Mucho Moss on Sep 27, 2009 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Smills brought up the politics

Everyone else is reacting to his opinion. He’s walking around a basketball blog making a political statement through his avatar.

If he wasn’t making a political statement in a place where it’s totally irrelevant and divisive we wouldn’t be having this argument.

Obviously.

"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)

by Mucho Moss on Sep 27, 2009 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excuse me?

No I didn’t.

YOU hijacked my thread here.

by Smills91 on Sep 27, 2009 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If any have a chance - it'll show up soon

Does anyone know of a Star that pretty early on, the first few years, just about everyone could see that they would possibly be a Star?
I can’t think of one. A few guys that ended up very good, (KM for instance) marginal All-Stars yes,
but Star potential shows up very very early. So I think we’ll soon know.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Sep 23, 2009 5:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Jermaine O'Neal? Tracy McGrady

Neither could quite carry a team on their own, but both were bona fide stars. Neither seemed to do much early on, if I recall correctly.

by LPKingsFan on Sep 25, 2009 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As you can see from your results...

…the question you pose is absurd.

Sorry, Smills, but even the most myopic, rose-tinted-glasses-wearing Kings homer can see that there is ZERO chance, none, nada, zilcho, that Spencer Hawes, JT, Donte’ Greene, or Omri freakin’ Casspi will somehow magically sprout wings and become NBA superstars! What is this the Sci-Fi channel?

I mean, Evans is also a longshot, but at least it’s within the realm of imagination. He does have considerable and rather unique athletic abilities, he’s extremely young, and (most important of all) he has done nothing yet to prove that it’s not possible.

Those other dudes though… development into solid NBA players, maybe an all-star appearance or two between the bunch of ‘em, that’s about the best we can hope for.

I’d say we’ve seen about 60%-75% of the ceiling potential of both Shock and Hawes. They will get better, that’s pretty for sure. But beyond that, what are we talking about here? Hawes is gonna be struck by lightning and evolve into the Second Coming of Bill Walton, and Jason Thompson gets bit by a radioactive spider and morphs into Kevin Garnett?

I think not.

"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)

by Mucho Moss on Sep 25, 2009 1:28 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The results is an evaluation

I’m not here saying they WILL become superstars, I’m here to evaluate the probability they will. I think Greene has superstar potential, but will unlikely reach it. I think Evans is likely to become a star. Thompson won’t IMO. Hawes will likely be an all-star a couple times or so in his prime. And I doubt Casspi comes close to that level.

The point is to evaluate our ROSTER and see, do we have someone with SS potential? And if so, will they reach that level. I thought I made that clear in my post, if not, I hope I did here in this post.

by Smills91 on Sep 25, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I see...

I didn’t notice your cute little political statement logo until just now either. Now I get it. You’re a wingnut.

Yeah, right, Smills, I see where you’re coming from now. The President of the United States is a covert Leninist Fellow Traveler and Spencer Hawes will soon have a plaque in Springfield.

Whoo hoo!

"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)

by Mucho Moss on Sep 25, 2009 1:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Glenn Beck his hero no doubt

Its amazing how a crazy (and I mean it – he’s both nuts and dangerous) can get people to listen to bile and hate.

From the left and right the idea is to rock the boat – not sink it.
(sorry, I said I wouldn’t talk politics here and I’ll shut up now.)

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Sep 25, 2009 9:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Politics is stupid

Its why I argue about sports instead.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.

by Aykis16 on Sep 25, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We live in an age

Where political demagoguery has been embraced by the mainstream media because it’s diversionary and it sells.

And now back to our previously-scheduled comment thread.

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Sep 25, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its nothing new

Its always been this way. The characters change and so does the time, but people – they stay the same throught the years.

by kwill on Sep 25, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It may not be new

But it’s a lot worse than it used to be. News and commentary used to be informed, in-depth and civil (think Walter Cronkite). It has since devolved into infotainment, propaganda, and mud wrestling. Frankly I don’t trust a damn thing I hear on the mainstream news (CNN, FOX, NBC, ABC, CBS, etc. etc.). All of the major media organizations are rife with conflicts of interests, and as a result their reporting is completely skewed, misdirected, and largely vacuous.

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Sep 25, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm Ron Burgundy


“Go f*ck yourself, MLS.”

(Kidding, of course – just couldn’t resist.)

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Sep 25, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No image, damn it!

Just a red “X” in a white box. And I didn’t see the movie. So I’m lagging badly here.

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Sep 25, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You really really need to see that movie.

Father of the "Natt this!" movement and Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order.

by Aykis16 on Sep 25, 2009 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The trailers look alternately hilarious and agonizingly painful

Sort of a “Tom Brokaw meets Borat” kind of a thing.

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Sep 25, 2009 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice how his views aren't allowed, but you guys are free to spit this drivel

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Sep 26, 2009 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, I like that word: "drivel"

Walking around here carrying a sign that claims the President of the United States is a Communist is exactly that… drivel. And it’s deliberately provocative drivel at that.

If you think somebody can say something that that and not start an argument you’re naive.

As soon as the political avatars are gone we’ll get back to talking hoops.

"When the going gets Weird, the Weird turn professional."
(Hunter Thompson)

by Mucho Moss on Sep 27, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's the thing

If you feel that his avatar is really that bad (which is your right), flag the comment and explain yourself to the moderators. Your tirade against Glenn Beck and flat-Earth republicans puts you on the same level as Smills. You may disagree with his views, but your arguments are full of at least as much vitriol as his avatar. I fully support your right to be up in arms about his political statement—I just think you’re going about it in the wrong way.

m*****f***ing c***s***ing peanut butter and jelly!! f*** f*** f***!!!

by JediLeroy on Sep 27, 2009 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is exactly why political avatars are inappropriate

They are a blaring invitation for an argument. Anyone with a political avatar (Smills, Kusian, others?), irrespective of their position, is essentially saying: “HERE ARE MY POLITICAL VIEWS! CARE TO ARGUE?” (Yes, the all caps are quite intentional.) It is a huge distraction from the topic(s) at hand, and it gets us all pissed off at each other, when we should be here to discuss basketball and the Kings, NOT our political views.

I try never to start these things. But I too get sucked in when others begin tossing political ideologies around. This is the wrong venue for it. It’s a lose-lose proposition; nobody is going to convert anyone on this site. An occasional political dig? Fine. Political grandstanding? Somewhere else.

So I move that we table the political debates, and that those of us with political avatars (right, left, up, down, whatever), ditch the political poster and come up with something fitting for this venue.

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Sep 26, 2009 8:05 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm against losing seasons and therefore am enraged by your avatar

please remove it.

Kidding, I just felt left out because I chose not to engage in the ruckus above.

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Sep 26, 2009 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some alternative avatars

Scoop ’em up, gang. Pick the one that best fits your personality!



SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Sep 26, 2009 9:38 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

I love a woman with a library

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Sep 26, 2009 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Library?

All I see are a couple of bookends. My face being the book.

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Sep 27, 2009 2:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or if you prefer a tougher candidate

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Sep 26, 2009 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

P.S. Note to Smills91

I have nothing personal against you at all. I respect (and in fact, I defend) your right to have political opinions that are the different from mine. But do you see what happened here?

You put a lot of thought into your first post, and the result was intelligent and comprehensible. But meanwhile a political loudspeaker is blaring in the background, and that loudspeaker was a total distraction from your intended topic. It was an invitation to debate politics when that was not really your intent (I assume).

So again, I courteously urge all my colleagues to refrain from political avatars on this website. Let’s try to focus on our similarities, not our differences. After all, we are all Kings fans here. Can’t we all just get along?

From the people who brought you Reggie Musselnatt.

by My Losing Season on Sep 26, 2009 9:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Why are you lecturing me?

Mucho Molar is the one that brought up the damn politics. I have every right to choose an avatar of my choice. I never mentioned politics once in any post until Mucho Molar continual harrassed me about a picture.

He’s the one that’s hijacked this thread.

In honesty, I’d like my first fanpost to get back to the topic on hand…BUILDING AROUND A SUPERSTAR, can the Kings do this?

by Smills91 on Sep 27, 2009 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And we're done here

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Sep 27, 2009 7:11 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.
Start posting about the Kings »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

200751153242283_small
Lottery Watch
Resized_tyreke6_small
NCAA March Madness Brackets!
Sadisticcomradepookey2_small
Why the recent Grant Napear-Sam Amick nonsense is just that: Nonsense
Garcia_small
Sacramento's Small Media Market is Showing
200751153242283_small
Talking about the "is" instead of the "isn't"

Recent FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Small
Let me calm everyone down...
Small
The classic non-scientific poll
Sadisticcomradepookey2_small
Getting together for the Peachquel....in Seattle
Small
Aldrich vs Monroe vs Udoh vs Whiteside
Small
Favorite player of all time.....
Small
Wesley Johnson?
Dsc02920_small
Truth in Advertising (AKA a look at the rookies)
Small
Who should replace Sam Amick?
Small
Tiago Splitter

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Local Sponsors

SBNation.com Recent Stories

San Antonio Spurs guard Malik Hairston is fouled on a dunk attempt over the Golden State Warriors' Anthony Tolliver during the second half of an NBA basketball game at the AT&T Center in San Antonio, Friday, March 19, 2010. The Spurs beat the Warriors, 147-116. (AP Photo/Bahram Mark Sobhani)

Spurs Torch Warriors, 147-116, In Highest Scoring Game Since 1991

Atlanta Hawks forward Marvin Williams, looks for a shot against Charlotte Bobcats forward Boris Diaw, left, of France, during the first quarter of an NBA basketball game at Philips Arena, Friday, March 19, 2010 in Atlanta. (AP Photo/Gregory Smith)

Johnson Does His Best Jordan Impersonation, Hits Winning Shot In OT

New Orleans Hornets forward James Posey, left, reaches in for the ball as Denver Nuggets forward Carmelo Anthony looks for a shot in the fourth quarter of the Nuggets' 93-80 victory in an NBA basketball game in Denver on Thursday, March 18, 2010. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski) link

Nuggets Rout Hornets 93-80

More from SBNation.com >


Editor

Loofie_small Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G

Eastern_logs_small Aykis16