Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dog Football! Which Breeds Are Best Suited For The Gridiron?

Kings continued misuse of talent

 

I think that one of the most frustrating things for me in watching this team in the last few years has been how the players have been used, or misused.  A lot of this has been due to a limited roster and poor selection of players to fill out the roster.  It is just more frustrating and worse as the poor selection has been compounded by the poor use of what talent that does exist on the team.  I am a little concern about the past continuing into the present… 

Star-divide

The single most frustrating thing has been watching players not used to their best talents.  There are some players who have been used well.  Kevin Martin is a good example, but he is such an excellent shooter that it really would be hard to do anything else.  He really is the exception. 

 

Let’s look at our bigs.  Spence is an excellent shooter and can knock down buckets.  If you have seen him practice you know that this guys makes all his shots and this is translating to his game.  He is, however, also the tallest guy on the team.  Because of his height he is the Center, but should he be?

 

I propose that Spencer not be a Center and instead should play PF.  Just because he is 7’ tall does not mean he should be the Center, tall does not Center make.  He really doesn’t like all the banging down low and doesn’t seem comfortable throwing his weight around.  He is also a better shooter outside than he is down low.  It seems IDIOTIC to me to have him play Center.  He really just should not be expected to play in such a way that is not consistent with how best to use him. 

 

JT should be the Center for the team.  He is almost as tall as Spence at 6’11”, a little heavier, loves and thrives off the contact.  So much so that he gets in foul trouble and is ready to use his body more defensively.  He ENJOYS the physicality of the Center position more than Spence and will, because of that, do better at it.  He is also a monster offensive rebounder so when Spence misses his shots JT will be there to clean up.

 

OK, if that doesn’t sell you on this then here is a really great parallel as an example.  Dirk Nowitzki of the Mavs is actually the tallest guy on their roster at 7’ and he does not play Center.  Erik Dampier is 6’11” and only 20 lbs heavier than Nowitzki, but plays Center.  Why?  Because Nowitzki is a better shooter and doesn’t like the contact.  Dampier likes the down low banging and does it better than Dirk… Sound familiar.  I am sure I could dig up more, but you get my point. 

 

I would like the Kings to use what talent they have in smarter ways.  I really don’t want to see the kind of misuse that happened last year.  I hope Westphal will do great, he can’t do much worse than last year. I am, however, very concerned when I hear statements from him about Spencer. 

 

It seems that he is pushing Spencer to play more like a traditional Center which he can never achieve instead of looking to use him in a way that best uses his shooting talent.  Not that he can’t improve on the defense and learn to use his height and weight better, but he won’t ever be a true Center whereas JT can be such a player.  Spence is more likely to have a game similar to Nowitzki.  Why not make the most of that? 

Poll
Who should be the team Center?
Spence
66 votes
JT
22 votes
Slamson
21 votes

109 votes | Poll has closed

(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Spencer can never be a traditional center?

I don’t think I would go that far. Yeah, he hasn’t looked particularly strong down low. But he has shown flashes of potential post moves—an offensive array that even Dirk doesn’t have down low. Shock, who looks to be a rebounder, hustler, and a banger in the paint, doesn’t much in the way of inside offense other than dunks and put backs. If this team is to go anywhere, it will need someone who can create in the post. Maybe Reke can be that guy if we choose to exploit his size advantage at the point. But I think Spencer has a lot of potential, based on some flashes he’s shown so far, of being a good offensive player inside as well.

Now, using his perimeter game and inside game don’t have to be mutually exclusive. Look at Vlade, for example. We loved his passing out of the high post, but he had his crafty post up moves as well. Spencer could be used in a similar fashion.

by LPKingsFan on Sep 25, 2009 10:58 PM PDT reply actions  

His hook

Your post reminds me of Spence’s hook shot. That has really been coming along pretty well and I can see what you mean…

I think the Kings need the most out of all their players and i hope they keep all sorts of peg holes in mind in developing each player to their individual best. Cause without that this open mindedness the Kings are going to be a lot poorer as a team in talent.

by MustangMBS on Sep 27, 2009 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have a couple of issues here

OK, to be fair, I have lots of issues. But specifically, I have a couple of issues with this post.

First, the title. You state that the KIngs continue to misuse talent, but you give no historical examples.

2nd, Hawes and JT played less than a half-season together in the starting lineup, under an interim head coach. That’s an awfully small sample size to make the declaration of "misuse of talent, in my opinion.

Now, to your question, I think that it depends on the matchup. Against Utah, for example, Hawes would cover Okur and JT would cover Boozer. By definition, Hawes is covering the opposing center. But that center is playing the on the perimeter, so Hawes is basically defending in the high post and JT in the low post.

Offensively, I think that Webber and Divac proved that the designation of "center’ or “power forward” didn’t mean much. They alternated in the high and low post. Divac was called the center and Webber was called the power forward, but they roamed the floor freely.

Also lost in your analysis is the fact that Hawes is easily the best shot blocker on the team (Francisco Garcia is the 2nd best shot blocker). So, if you are talking about setting up defensively from a zone point of view, Hawes would be your best defender at the basket.

Bottom line, I don’t think that it matters who is the “center” on this team. What matters is who is on the floor, and how the match ups play out.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Sep 26, 2009 9:03 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

I also have some issues

JT has no low post game other than the tip drill. He’s got a good midrange jumper and is learning to put the ball on the floor & drive to the rim where he finishes strong. But, flat footed under the rim, I have yet to see him put the ball in the basket with any authority while defended. I’m not sure he ever will, because of his lack of vertical jumping ability. He has the perfect skill set for a PF, but could be a decent backup center in time with improvement in his low post moves, expecially his left hand.

Spence is a center. He is prone to lose the ball when he dribble penetrates. Which makes him a poor choice for PF because away from the rim his only viable option is the jumpshoot. In his limited PT he’s shown to be a decent scorer in the low post, who will undoubtedly improve with time. He’s also taller & a better leaper than JT. Also, JT is 3yrs older, so allow Spence a few more year to bulk up, I see Hawes being a stonger defensive presence. Plus as 214 mentioned, he’s already the best shoot blocker we’ve had in years expecially from the weakside.

And, although I agree with Section that both players & positions are interchangeable on this team, Spencer is far better equiped to play center than JT, even though JT had more experience playing the position in college. Don’t let Spence’s ability to hit the outside shot cloud the issue.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom

by HighTops on Sep 26, 2009 9:29 AM PDT reply actions  

Good points all

Development of the players and seeing how they grow may be the key to many of these issues. I sometimes question if it is lack of talent or if they just need the right coaching.

Spence seems lanky and long and I wonder if he will really bulk up. His body type just seems that way to me, but then again I filled in from being a bean pole so we shall see. Isn’t weakside help usually somebody coming in and helping the Center and not the Center himself?

I don’t know that I was thinking about their current skill set as much what they could achieve later with growth and development. Taking Spence’s shooting ability and working from there really leads to some nice thoughts about just what he could do. It may be that I focus too much on that and not other skills..

Thanks for the input.

by MustangMBS on Sep 27, 2009 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Part of it

that I didn’t make explicit is not as much about how they are playing now, but in terms of thinking how each player will develop and what should the coaching focus on developing. IMHO I think Spence, with the right work, could develop more into a Dirk type of player and less than a Dampier type and JT could more easily develop into the reverse.

I just hope the coaching staff don’t try to mash these kids into molds and let their strengths play. Granted we had REALLY bad coaching who did not know how to use what they had in the past and that given this teams history it would seem that we can do better and use talent accordingly.

I think that this is how the two guys will be used regardless of their designated letters. More like the example the 214 gives of Webber and Vlade. IMHO I think it will just naturally work out that way and yeah we can hope the coaching staff can match these guys up well. I just hope that the coaching staff can get past forcing people into roles that they cannot fill. I think this has happened a lot, but again Westphal should be able to do better.

A lot of my frustration was not with Spence and JT in the mismatched use of talent and may have been more due the limited roster. There really wasn’t sufficient depth at PG with anybody who could pass well. For example, in pushing Douby and Garcia into that role, or trying, they could not set them up as outside shooters. It was just weird to see this team play half the time.

by MustangMBS on Sep 26, 2009 10:04 AM PDT reply actions  

Douby is a good example

of trying to pound a square peg into a round hole. The only question that remains is whether he will ever prove that he does indeed possess NBA talent. One thing is for sure – this one was a “fail” for the Kings.

I don’t agree as much with Garcia. He is a multi-faceted player whose many dimensions come in handy as an off the bench player. Indeed, the need for Garcia to wear so many hats has probably better developed him as an overall player.

To your earlier point, yes, Spencer could be Dirk if he was playing with Dampier. He could also be Okur if he were playing with Boozer. So a lot of this comes down to how the talent around Hawes develops, as well as how Hawes develops himself. I don’t see that as a misuse of talent as much as I see it as a development of talent.

Good take.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Sep 26, 2009 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Garcia, Spence, and JF

I absolutely agree with you about how that use of Garcia may have benefited his development. I think the gains for him in development came at the expense of points, but there really wasn’t many other options for ball handlers. He is probably, IMHO, one of the most complete players on the team. Offense, defense, and all the little things he does for the team.

I think that as you point out with Garcia, use of a player leads to development and that is one of my concerns. The stuff I have heard is that Spence should draw more fouls, be more physically aggressive in the paint, and basically play more like a stereotypical Center. I don’t think this really is Spence’s game. His shot is off when somebody puts a body on him and, while I hope he can improve that, I wonder if pushing him to act more like a stereotypical Center has some risks for his development.

I do agree that he needs to have a Dampier type to develop in this way. I guess I have been thinking JT can fill that bill, but I think that JT has more potential than just that. In looking at what he feeds off and what gets JT going it seems like he really likes the contact. That it revs him up and adds to the intensity with which he plays.

It is kind of like fist fighting. There are some guys you would just not want to fight. It is those guys that take a punch, smile cause they love it, and come back twice as intense. I think there is some of that in JT that could be developed. In reflecting on this I really think it is taking that kind of individual quality and developing it that is really important and could make JT more of a low post presence than Spence.

Maybe I am off on what I have seen the play of these players.

by MustangMBS on Sep 27, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

All Hawes has to do to draw more fouls

is to greatly simplify his game around the basket.
He tries to make too many moves, tries to shoot around the defenders instead of forcing the issue – and therefore misses more than he should close in.

If he learns to invite a little contact down there rather than giving the opponent 3 or 4 dribbles to prepare his inevitiable shot – he’ll both draw more fouls and make more shots.
Its not even close to being over for his development. This season will tell a lot.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Sep 28, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

prepare 'for' his inevit. shot

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Sep 28, 2009 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

We saw some early signs of a post game last season, that were nonexistent during his rookie season. Most of which is due to his strength increases last summer. I expect his growth to continue this year.

I also hope the coach calls an occasional play so we don’t stop getting the ball to Hawes in the post after 1-2 tries.

I think we need continue to be patient. He’s still 2-3 years away from final conclusion status, imo. Continued progress in the right direction and solid improvement each season is what we should be looking for.

Ball movement ... is like jogging for most people: They do it occasionally, and it makes them happy. Then they go back to not doing it. - Henry Abbott

by Kfan in Korea on Sep 28, 2009 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Positions...

I think positions are really about defense—about minimizing mismatches. I think JT’s style is well-suited for post defense, sure. And I think that Hawes’ style is more perimenter-oriented. BUT, the (poor for Kings) mismatch created by Hawes guarding most PFs overcomes the benefit of trying to work to the player’s styles…

Probably a bad example to try to illustrate my point: Say Dirk and Bonsi Wells played on the same team…and Dirk is perimeter-oriented shooter-type and Bonsi is a banger physical guy. Does this mean that Bonsi and Dirk should switch positions? Probably not…it would create to many mismatches to overcome on the defensive end…

Of course, the difference between Shock and Hawes is less than that of Dirk and Bonsi, but I think the principal holds.

Anyways, not much point in arguing about positions, I feel. As long as we know their characteristics, they can be switched on D to best suit the situation—just as we might switch KMart and Tyreke in some situations.

by DustyG on Sep 26, 2009 12:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Good point

Spence would really have a hard time guarding a really quick PF. Match ups is really going to be key to how this plays out.

by MustangMBS on Sep 27, 2009 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Why #SayYes?
H0zca7s150tca95sfjscanfe1ybca7g7ohsca7s2phecadcfkcgcavang23cazdt3fpca3lwbl6ca97c92mcagt08cqca9mblmqcatpyt5lcano3ozbcapa2qy9caf2uy7ocaatxycicazwnb2scahv7ame_small
A Kings Fan's Guide To Yiddish
Demarcus-cousins-cho_small
A Micromoment in Time
Demarcus-cousins-kentucky-university-gestures-after-being-selected-the-sacramento-kings-the-fifth-overall-pick-the-2010-nba-draft-new-york_small
Just rewatched the game on TNT after being there....
Webber_in_tuxedo_small
A Story Within the Enemy Camp

Recent FanPosts

Elrontoro_small
Here is Cohn's positive response to my email
Small
Jj Hickson
Darth-vader_small
No Jimmer in the 3 point contest?!?!
Small
This Week's Asinine Trade Thread, February 12-20
Small
Here's to hoping for the best
S113399682030553_3084_small
Fan from a Far

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G