Taking a Look at Advanced Statistics from Preseason
With the help of www.dougstats.com and my advanced statistics calculator, I decided to take a look at some of the advanced statistics of the Kings from preseason. Note: Due to the already small sample size of preseason, I only focused on the players that played six or seven games. Also, do remember that this is a combination of small sample size and preseason, so take some of them with a grain of salt.
Alright let's take a look at the stats after the jump. I only focused on stats that matter for certain players, like Assist Rate for the guards, and rebound rate for the bigs, etc. If you're interested in finding out the other stats, use the calculator above with the stats from DougStats.
True Shooting % (Measure's shot efficiency, taking into account FG%, FT%, and 3P%)
- Luther Head - 60.2%
- Darnell Jackson - 56.4%
- Carl Landry - 55.7%
- Omri Casspi - 50.4%
- Tyreke Evans - 49.7%
- DeMarcus Cousins - 49.5%
- Jason Thompson - 46.1%
- Donté Greene - 42.7%
- Pooh Jeter - 42.7%
- Tyreke Evans - 37.4%
- Luther Head - 20.7%
- Pooh Jeter - 18.0%
- Omri Casspi - 15.8%
- Jason Thompson - 14.3%
- DeMarcus Cousins - 13.2%
- Carl Landry - 5.9%
- Omri Casspi - 26.3%
- Jason Thompson - 21.5%
- Darnell Jackson - 20.8%
- DeMarcus Cousins - 20.6%
- Donté Greene - 16.9%
- Carl Landry - 11.7%
- Jason Thompson - 19.5%
- Tyreke Evans - 18.0%
- DeMarcus Cousins - 17.2%
- Pooh Jeter - 14.6%
- Omri Casspi - 10.1%
- Luther Head - 7.4%
- DeMarcus Cousins - 29.1%
- Tyreke Evans - 28.3%
- Jason Thompson - 20.4%
- Carl Landry - 19.1%
- Donte Greene - 18.6%
- Omri Casspi - 17.6%
- Pooh Jeter - 16.4%
- Luther Head - 15.8%
- Darnell Jackson - 14.0%
124 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'd like to see Evans' TS% go up into the high 50's
And yes, Landry’s rebounding numbers look horrible. I think if he goes into an offensive slump this season, it’s going to be VERY bad for him, although a 6th man role may fit him quite well when all’s said and done.
Good luck with that.
With a few of the players I’ve perused over time, and with relation to what you said about Tyreke’s TS% going up, the likelihood is that it won’t. Unless something dramatically changes about Tyreke in the next few years that is.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
He could get around the mid 50s pretty easily
If his jumper gets better and his free throw % gets to the 80% range like I think it should.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
Mid 50's isn't anything to write home about.
He won’t catch my attention until he’s 58+ consistently.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
The top 40 players last season were from between 58% and 64.3%
That’s for players who played at least 20+ mpg and in 40+ games. And, only 11 of those 40 were guards, so 58% would put him in the top 10 among guards. Not bad. But, not likely considering the nature of his game right now.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
If he ain't in the top 10 of G's in efficiency.....
…he’d better be doing EVERYTHING else in the top 5 if he’s a franchise talent. That simple HT.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Umm, not no really.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
no not really^
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Exactly how
did Donte win that starting spot over Omri again? Was the starting spot first place in the preseason competition, or second?
I still like Donte in the starting lineup
If he only gets 20 minutes and Omri gets 28 (or more) that’s fine to me. I just don’t like having Donte and Carl in the starting lineup.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
But then again, if you have Omri and Carl in the starting lineup
That’s 4 players that really need shots together at the same time between them and Reke-DMC.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
Yeah, I prefer Donté and Carl starting over
Donté and JT being our offense off the bench.
Don't say stupid shit. You won’t be perceived as stupid. - pookeyguru
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 25, 2010 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions
I worry about rebounding with those two guys
(as I’ve said a bunch of times)
I think either JT has to start or Omri so we stop losing the 1st and 3rd quarter rebounding. The current problem/other side of the coin is that JT can play either C or PF so with Sammy out .. . but that sounds like it changes soon.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions
I hear you about the rebounding. I'd be more inclined to start JT over Carl
to address that problem and reap the rewards of Carl and Omri providing offense with the second unit.
I’m afraid if Omri gets the start, we’ll end up wasting a lot of his offense because he’ll end up being the 4th or 5th option.
Don't say stupid shit. You won’t be perceived as stupid. - pookeyguru
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 25, 2010 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions
Agreed completely.
It’s why I prefer Omri off the bench.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
Ultimately, I am hopeful that Omri improves to the point where he can play 35 minutes a game
and focus on ball-movement, rebounding and defense with the first unit and scoring when the second unit joins him out there.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
Good points
Omri is a good fit off the bench, but Greene and Landry have to improve their rebounding if they are going to start together. Greene has shown some improvement, Landry hasn’t.
Also, JT is a bit more energetic, where Landry is a bit more methodical in approach. With Casspi starting on the bench, the energy and husstle of Thompson in the starting lineup could help to avoid slow starts.
Dunking Dutchman
Nice breakdown Aykis
Should I assume that Donté’s turnover rate was less than 7.4% since he showed up in other stats? That encouraging.
Don't say stupid shit. You won’t be perceived as stupid. - pookeyguru
He had 7 turnovers and only 3 assists
So I didn’t opt to put him in the ballhandlers stats like Omri, who had way more assists. Omri had 6 turnovers in 10 more minutes, so Donte’s TOV% was probably around 11-12%.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
Well then, boo for your misleading stats
and double boo for Donté’s poor play overall though out the preseason.
Don't say stupid shit. You won’t be perceived as stupid. - pookeyguru
by Kfan in Korea on Oct 25, 2010 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions
His TOV% for career is 13.1%
so he’s pretty much in line with what he already has. But yeah, other than upping the rebounding, he’s done poorly.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
He's been wretched.
he needs to show some improvement soon or PW will pull the trigger.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions
I'm mostly pissed that he can't hit a damn free throw.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
I'd settle
for him looking reasonably efficient and controlled out there, including FTs.
Start from there.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions
I am actually encouraged by Greene's rebounding
that requires a change in mindset. I hope he can improve om last year’s shooting, and that he isn’t on target yet in the preseason doesn’t worry me too much.
The biggest question I have is whether he can establish himself as a good defender, and can consistently slow down the superstars of this league. .
Dunking Dutchman
I only saw one game with improved rebounding
maybe two, and in both those games neither team shot very well so there were a lot more rebounding opportunities. Still, he did do it so there’s some hope.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Aykis
never mind my comment about Head vs Jeter in the other thread, I see what you based the opinion on but – small sample size . . .
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
I also have what my eyes see
And that is that Head is pretty quick himself, a better defender than Jeter, and his size provides less of a disadvantage on both ends of the court.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
Could you amend this and give us non advanced stat guys
an idea of what league averages are on these categories?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions
That might be a job for Ziller actually, I don't know exactly what the league average is.
I just know around what’s good for certain players. 20% or over is what you want defensive rebounding from your bigs, 15-16% or over is great from a SF or SG. Offensive rebounding above 10% is good.
Usage has to be taken in context. The higher it is, the more he’s getting the ball. You have to look at what he’s doing with the ball however. Is it good, a la Tyreke last year, or bad, like DMC has been in the last few games of preseason.
Assist Rate you want ideally over 25% for your main guard, but elite guys are all in the upper 30s. John Stockton had years over 50% SEVEN years, and stayed above 45% every year but his first two. There has never been a passer like him. The best passer now is Steve Nash, and he’s at about 40.3% for his career.
Turnover % is good around 13% or lower.
True Shooting % you probably want around 55% or higher. Bigs should be more efficient, especially if they tend to play down low.
Hope that helps.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
by Aykis16 on Oct 25, 2010 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Great work Aykis.
Way to use your advanced stat calculator to add great insight to the pre-season.
Casspi has been amazing. I had this discussion with Section yesterday about what is expected of the small forward position and the misconception that goes with those expectations. Just because Donté Greene is the 4th or 5th option on offense, doesn’t mean that he will take the 4th or 5th number of shots in comparison with the other starters. An open player is going to get plenty of opportunities, he just doesn’t get to control when those opportunities will come so he needs to be prepared when they do. What Westphal wants is a guy who stays in the corner and hits the three and on occasion up fakes and takes the ball to the hole. The small forward is also not precluded from grabbing rebounds and scoring on those rebounds.
What the small forward is not, is a guy who spends 10 seconds trying to create off the dribble. He is not a primary ball handler or “point forward”. I look at this position as a check down receiver in the NFL. When the first option fails, there is the second option. After the second option, a properly positioned player has just as much of a chance of getting a shot as anyone, and with the play style of Tyreke Evans, the corner should be open most of the time.
Casspi get’s it. If he wants more shots then he rebounds better or he runs harder on the break for a couple of freebies. If he wants the kick-out, then he needs to be in position and dish to teammates when they have a better shot. It is pretty basic basketball. It requires a player like Greene or Casspi to focus on specific things like perimeter shooting, defense and rebounding.
I’m not sure what to expect out of this early season but I do know that the Kings have a much deeper and more talented team than they have had in a long time. If somebody doesn’t get the concept quickly, there is someone ready to take over at just about every position. I can’t remember the last time the Kings had a bench with quality NBA players like Omri Casspi, Antoine Wright, Luther Head, Jason Thompson, Francisco Garcia and either DeMarcus Cousins, Samuel Dalembert or Carl Landry. There are not just bench guys waiting in the wings but starters and that is a nice problem to have.
The world is not your Trade Machine.
-Ziller
Bench mob?
“The Mob is comprised of its primary group—Martin, Barry, Peja Stojakovic,Lawrence Funderburke and Scot Pollard—and a secondary group, defensive specialists Tyrone Corbin and Tony Delk, plus rarely used center Bill Wennington.”
Thanks
I think I and most will need something to compare how our guys rate vs their contemporaries at their positions to find the data truly revealing.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions
A note on Stockton.
Keep in mind that one reason his Assists continued to be high because he and Karl Malone played almost all of their high volume minutes over the course of their career together. (Malone had a few years before Stock played heavy minutes in Utah—Stock didn’t start for the first 3 years of his career—and declined his last 4 years in Utah.) Karl Malone is the 2nd leading scorer of all time, and a lot of those buckets were assisted by Stockton.
As much as I like Stockton, and he was a brilliant player whose great characteristics I think too often are noted by his “assist” total, he was aided greatly by a lot of circumstances many of the gifted passers in NBA history weren’t afforded.
All I’m trying to say on this one.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Luther Head has become an ok player?
When did this happen? I remember him as horrible in Houston.
"Each in turn... volunteered his suggestions, his invaluable suggestions."
Twitter - xiane1
The Dreamshake
by Xiane on Oct 25, 2010 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
DeMarcus uses up a lot of possessions, and that’s a bit troubling right now, because he’s pretty inefficient. He tends to keep trying to score even when he’s having an off night, and he needs to learn to utilize his excellent passing skills more often, to move the ball around.
And people wonder why I wanted Derrick Favors. This is exactly the problem I had with DMC in college, and so far it’s holding true in the pro’s. Whether it changes or not we shall see. It might in 2 years, and maybe not. Only time will tell on this one.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Derrick Favors is averaging
4 points and 4 rebounds. He is not exactly tearing it up, either.
DMC was extremely efficient in college. I don’t see the correlation. The mistakes are to be expected. What will be important is to see how quickly he learns from them. Personally I have a lot of confidence in DMC he is going to adjust quickly.
I predict JT puts up 7/5 this year.
No actually Favors was extremely efficient in college.
And DMC was middle of the road. You got it backward. But then again, I wouldn’t expect anything less from you.
And just so you know here is Favors TS% at GA TEch and Cousins TS%. Cousins TS% is well below Favors. In an environment that absolutely favors a player like Cousins with his offensive talent.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I didn't say anything about Favors efficiency in college.
And TS% is a measure of scoring efficieny. It is not a measure of overall efficiency.
From, ESPN Insider:
DeMarcus Cousins has the fifth-highest rating in the Draft Rater’s nine seasons evaluated.
Based on that, the outlook for Cousins is quite positive. Of the eight previous players from 2002 to 2008 to rate 15.0 or higher, four became superstars: Durant, Carmelo Anthony, Dwyane Wade and Chris Paul. Of the other four, three have been very productive starters — Rudy Gay, Luol Deng and Drew Gooden — and one became, well, Mike Conley. We had another three last year, and from that trio, one was awesome (Tyreke Evans), one was good (Ty Lawson) and one didn’t play a game (Blake Griffin).
Draft Rater’s top 12 (Projected PER based on College stats)
1 DeMarcus Cousins 16.14
2. Evan Turner 14.79
3. John Wall 14.68
4. Greg Monroe 14.39
5. Derrick Favors 13.98
In other words, you are incorrect.
I predict JT puts up 7/5 this year.
In otherwords.....
…I was talking about shooting efficiency. Do you read anything blob? Or do you just make up the argument as you go and then answer it to your satisfaction? Don’t answer that. I’m not really interested in any insights into your moronic commentary you retarded douchebag.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I think you're both
worrying and trying to draw conclusions over some pre-season stats. I think Cousins will be the superior player pretty easily but why don’t we revisit this with a month r two of real NBA data?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 2:18 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't have a temper
I am a passionate fan, though.
Pookey Guru in his infinite expertise said he had a problem with DMCs inefficiency in college. And so far it is holding true in the pros. Word for word. (See above)
And I countered with the fact that was completely false, with the facts to back it up. And for that I am a douchebag and moron? Give me a break.
I predict JT puts up 7/5 this year.
My conclusion about DMC came from a few observations (not enough but it almost never is).....
….and looking at stats months ago. His TS% during pre-season was low, but even he doesn’t shoot that inefficiently. But higher than 57%? Not likely. It’s just not. Sorry.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
What makes JTs preseason stats disconcerting
…is he came to camp ‘improved’ and in great shape after a ‘great’ summer. And these are the results? Yikes.
At least Carl was admittedly ‘rusty’ and is self-critical despite playing pretty good. DMC has a lot of work to do on his conditioning and experience to gain. What excuse does JT have? He has gotten minutes, knows the league, and yet he wallows in underachieving.
I have been accused of having irrational hatred and emotional bias against JT by many on StR. Hopefully these silly accusations will end as others are able to look at JT with the same objective criticism as I do. I scoffed at the presumption he is an ideal third big on a contending team, unless you are contending for another high lotto pick.
The idea that JT is a beast on the boards can be dismissed too. When he gets tough rebounds in traffic, and rebounds balls outside his own area more often, then we can talk about his beastly status. A player cannot be a beast on the boards if he has bad hands and below average hand-eye coordination.
The further idea that JT needs to be on the floor for rebounding and defense is negated by alarming TO rate and inability to score with any efficiency. What good is gaining a possession (rebound) if you can’t do anything with it (TO or miss)?
JT had the 31st out of 37th worst PER of all Western conference ’4’s and ’5’s players last year. This preseason is not an anomaly. Just a continuation of the player he has shown to be, fundamentally lacking with an unstable emotional temperament.
With Sammy D and Upside rehabbing, with DMC learning the ways of the NBA, we really could use stability down low and a reliable second big to Carl to make a lot of smart and basic plays. JT could be a significant anchor and winning influence if he could raise his level of play to one of consistent contribution. Unfortunately he doesn’t appear capable.
Further, Carl and Omri need to have higher usage rates than JT. A double whammy to team success is a player who is not very good, but thinks he is: a relatively low PER and high usage rate is a recipe for defeat.
Sorry for all the negativity before the season even starts, lol, but Akis advanced stats set me off, it is his fault. :) I don’t like to be negative, which I know is probably hard to believe, lol, so I will end with a positive. Upside had 3 blocks in 14 minutes, only the stat man screwed him out of one in the second quarter. On a prorated 36 minutes basis, Upside will average almost 8 blocks a game and shatter the NBA record!!
I predict JT puts up 7/5 this year.
And you wonder why people think you're a zealot.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
#1 in offensive rebounding rate this preseason for the Kings, #2 in defensive rate
Since I’ll take you at your word when it comes to being “objective,” I’ll assume that this information wound up in an erroneously edited paragraph.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Oct 25, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
and section beat me to it
I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.
by wallywagon11 on Oct 25, 2010 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions
The idea that JT is a beast on the boards can be dismissed too. When he gets tough rebounds in traffic, and rebounds balls outside his own area more often, then we can talk about his beastly status. A player cannot be a beast on the boards if he has bad hands and below average hand-eye coordination.
How about we measure his rebounding by actually looking at how well he rebounds. Maybe his rebound rate would be better than hyperbole?
I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.
by wallywagon11 on Oct 25, 2010 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Cmon now!
Honesty and facts are just pesky things that get in the way of a real argument. This is, of course, opposed to hyperbole and bullshit where being butthurt and fake arguments that turn into World War 3. This is what’s really important, yanno.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Not hyperbole
Just a personal observation. Let me ask you, how often do you see JT get a tough rebound in traffic, or hustle down a board and beat a man to it? Or tap a ball to himself, or anticipate the bounce off the rim, and the direction it will go? He reacts, he does not anticipate.
Maybe I am missing something. But I don’t think so. I see him get a lot of rebounds in his area. I see him get his share of missed free throws. This doesn’t make him beastly.
I predict JT puts up 7/5 this year.
Then how come JT rebounds way more than Carl Landry?
And by way more, I mean more than double.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
Every single one of those rebounds
For the past two years, could not have simply been luck.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
No doubt
Carl is an inferior rebounder to JT. But last year Carl averaged 6.5 boards with the Kings, while JT got 8.5. That is hardly double. In preseason, the stats are 5.0 to 7.6. Thats not double either.
Let’s forget about ‘beastly’ because it is difficult to quantify. I think an elite rebounder has soft hands, an ability to anticipate, and tap the ball to himself or a teammate over out stretched arms. Does JT ever do that? Not really. Think Jon Brockman, and pre-injury C-Webb. They brought special rebounding skill.
Yes JT is a good rebounder. I like his hustle. But he is not elite. Not close. He misses opportunity because he jabs at the ball. He lacks anticipation, timing, and coordination. He will reach for it and slap it out bounds or fight with a teammate and lose possession.
All this means is JTs contribution on the boards is readily replaceable once Hasaan and DMC mature as players.
I predict JT puts up 7/5 this year.
Carl is an inferior rebounder to JT. But last year Carl averaged 6.5 boards with the Kings, while JT got 8.5. That is hardly double.
During Landry’s time in Sac he had a 9.9% true rebounding percentage. 15.4% is not double but one might want to use rate numbers in this arguement.
Let’s forget about ‘beastly’ because it is difficult to quantify
agreed
Yes JT is a good rebounder. I like his hustle. But he is not elite. Not close. He misses opportunity because he jabs at the ball. He lacks anticipation, timing, and coordination. He will reach for it and slap it out bounds or fight with a teammate and lose possession.
All this means is JTs contribution on the boards is readily replaceable once Hasaan and DMC mature as players.
I enjoy how you try and turn a plus for Jason into a negative. Look, I personally like Landry more than Jason so on one hand I get where you are coming from but at the same time this is kind of a silly to keep driving this home constantly. One can say that DMC makes Landry just as replaceable give his scoring punch and Whiteside could just roll over to the PF spot like the Kings want him to.
I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.
by wallywagon11 on Oct 25, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions
awesome block quote fail on my part at the beginning there
I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.
by wallywagon11 on Oct 25, 2010 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't totally disagree about JT's ability to fight for rebounds at the rim
but to clarify the numbers, JT played 20% fewer minutes than Carl last year. So, Carl’s rebounds are somewhat inflated by his PT. But, if you look at TRR for last year, JT was at 15.5% and Carl was at 9.9%. To put that in perspective, Hawes who was everyone’s whipping boy on the boards, had a rate of 13.1.
I brought this one up elsewhere in this threat, but I wonder what the total average rebounds per game for them would be if we deducted rebounds off of missed FT. I only say this because at 6-8, I don’t believe Carl gets to stand closest to the rim during FT attempts. I’m guessing the taller players like Spencer, JT, & Donte got that advantage. Although I didn’t pay close attention so I really don’t know.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
by HighTops on Oct 25, 2010 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Um -
5.0 to 7.6 is more than a 50% difference. That is tangible, no?
Now, I agree 100% that Cousins and Whiteside might eventually replace what Thompson brings to the table…except that if Dalembert and Landry both wind up going elswhere after the season, Thompson will continue to fill the 3rd or 4th man up front seat at a relatively low price.
Blob, you make it sound like anyone can just show up and grab rebounds. But over the past two years, Carl Landry couldn’t do it, Spencer Hawes couldn’t do it, Kenny Thomas couldn’t do it, Sean May couldn’t do it, Mikki Moore couldn’t do it, Shelden Williams couldn’t do it…
There is more to rebounding than you are willing to give Thompson credit for. If it were truly that easy, everyone would do it.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Also the point I use rebound rate instead of just rebound numbers
Is they take into account rebounds grabbed while on the court. That’s why I used the “double” This is more of a reply to Blob than you Section.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
Let's face it, Rebounding Rate is nothing more than an attempt a quantifying value by averaging averages
It takes into consideration the players rebounds and his PT, and then compares that to how many of the total rebounds by both teams divided by the total minutes played timer the players PT. But, in reality, it doesn’t really know how many rebounds there really were while he was on the court or where he was on the court compared to where to rebound was made. And, then it’s adjusted to 100 per game.
If Beno is on the court for 48 mins and stays beyond the FT line because his assignment it to get back on defense to stop the break, how many of the 100 rebounds does he really have a legitamate chance to get? And, Everyone knows that in his first year, JT’s offensive rebounding numbers were inflated by tip ins off his own missed shots.
I’m not saying that you can’t compare players who play like positions over a long period of time because things should eventually average out. What I am saying, is that the numbers aren’t a scientific certainty, and as such don’t prove that someone is twice as good as someone else.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
How many Angels balance on the head of a needle? No, I want an answer now! Don't tell me you can't give me that answer! NOW GODDAMMIT! NOW! NOW!
Yeah, that was overboard. Which is the point.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
great post, High Tops
And this (coupled with your observation below about Omri grabbing half his rebounds from missed FTs) is why I am skeptical of discovering through advanced metrics that bad players are actually good and vice versa. To me, many times advanced metrics are the lie that gets halfway around the world before the truth runs it down.
Let’s watch games and let our eyes tell us who is helping us win and who sucks.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
Uhhhh
That comment, actually question, was about Landry vs JT. I believe Omri would be playing with the same rebounding disadvantage as Landry, that is, not being in the #1 position on Free throws.
Still, an interesting question.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions
Unfortunately, I didn't look it up but quoted based on memory
and as lttg pointed out it wasn’t half, it was more like 50% from Omri off of missed FT’s, and I’m also not sure if Omri was getting one of the front spots.
To really know, I’d have to go and rewatch the games. Sorry for the misinformation.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
More like 25% not 50% which is of course half.
pretty soon I’m going to have to hire my own editor, just so I can post.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
It is difficult to debate someone
who takes exception to what is or isn’t ‘double’. My point to Akis is simply to question the assertion that JT rebounds at double the rate of Carl. Does he? No. Is 7.5 50% more than 5.0? Yes, and irrelevant to my point.
Whether you want to use absolute numbers, or rebounding rate, he is not twice the rebounder. Not 200% better. JT is superior, but not that superior!
Regarding your list of names, you conveniently leave off Jon Brockman, a 6’7" rookie with superior rebounding ability than JT. Last year, Brockness Monster, as a second round pick that we traded away for nothing, had 18.7% rebounding rate. JT had rate of 15.5% rebounding rate.
So if you want to assign value to JTs skill as a rebounder it is only fair to consider it in full context, of which Brockman can be included.
I predict JT puts up 7/5 this year.
Last year, Brockness Monster, as a second round pick thatwe traded away for nothing
But in reality for Darnell Jackson and a 2011 2nd round pick.
Darnell Jackson and a 2nd rd pick are not “nothing”. It may not be valuable to you, but technically that’s “something”. The NBA CBA requires such blob. Of course, if you had an ounce of sense, of which I’m beginning to question if you really in fact possess this, or you just possession of such when you come to StR to talk about the Kings, you might have gotten the facts straight. But you didn’t. As usual.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
just lack possession of such^
argh @ no proofreading
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
You are making a myopic and insignificant point
I realize that the trade of Brockman was for Jackson and a pick.
But it was not motivated to improve our basketball team. It was a give away of a player based on financial concerns, allowing what was best from Brockman and his future in the league, and a numbers crunch in the front court.
So we traded away Brockman without specific designs on getting better as a team. In that regard, we traded him for nothing.
I predict JT puts up 7/5 this year.
How would have keeping Brockman helped the Kings improve as a team THIS YEAR?
Whose minutes would he have taken away? Or, is that part of the equation a meaningless abstract moment in your pointless existence?
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not debating anything with you
I am merely pointing out that Thompson is the one guy that has, over his two years as a King, robounded the ball better than anyone else. You want to include Brockman? Fine. It is too bad that his skill set and was even more limited than your perception of JT’s, or he might have actually logged a few more minutes.
And yes, 50% more is not double. But be honest – your point wasn’t semantics. Your point was that there is not a big difference between 5 and 7.6 rebounds a game. I beg to differ.
You’ve done it again, blob. Through your continued protestations of anything positive about Thompson, you have shown yourself to be a hater of the young man. I have given up trying to figure out why. But you are nowhere near even or balanced when it comes to this kid. You’ve already got Hassan Whiteside passing him by, and Whiteside has played about 6 minutes of preseason basketball.
The great thing for you is that Thompson (barring injury) is likely to have at least a 10 year NBA career, so you still have a lot of time to vent about him. Good luck and God bless. Your take on him is so unbalanced that I no longer have any desire to discuss it with you. Life is short, and I respectfully (emphasis on “fully”) disagree with your take on Thompson.
I do not look forward to you pounding your one note throughout the game threads this year. I suppose it has to be a given player and poster each year. Last year it was Kevin Martin and Virginia Blue. This year it will be Jason Thompson and bench_blob. So not looking forward to it.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Oct 25, 2010 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
Thabeeeeeeet!
(feel better?)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions
No
My point is JT does not get twice as many rebounds, or rebound at twice the rate. Please don’t tell me my point. I am quite capable of making my own without your assistance.
If someone wanted to reasonably debate the merits of JT, they might talk about improved post play, developing a half hook, reducing foul tendencies, improved passing, etc, but tangible evidence is in short supply. He seems to have regressed and/or plateaued by observable measure, and not the player the front office envisioned. This is not a crime or an insult. This is just the reality.
But what happens when rational counterpoints cannot be levied? The argument turns personal. And all of the sudden I am a hater and speak in hyperbole. Or I get called names and verbally attacked (see pookey guru), and which happens when people run out of intelligible things to say on topic, so they make it about the other person, instead of the issue.
I want to see the Kings win. And if I see a player on the roster who in my view is incapable of facilitating team success then I am going to say so. Its not anything personal against the player. I want to see the Kings win. I feel like I need to repeat this ten times for you because you don’t get it. You think you have me figured out and you are wrong.
Its not anything personal against the player. I want to see the Kings win.
Its not anything personal against the player. I want to see the Kings win.
Its not anything personal against the player. I want to see the Kings win.
Its not anything personal against the player. I want to see the Kings win.
Its not anything personal against the player. I want to see the Kings win.
The list of players I have questioned does not start and end with JT. Before him, there was:
Ime Udoka
Shelden Williams
John Salmons
post -injury C-Webb
Jason Hart
Donte Greene (pending)
And a few others I am missing but I care not to recall.
I ask you this:
Who would garner more credibility to an impartial observer of two fans to their favorite sports team: Fan #1 who adores all players, supports them regardless of their flaws, and lack of skill development, and spotty performance record, or Fan #2 who wants to see his team win just as badly, but is able to discern between players who can lead to team success versus those with a borderline set of basketball skills and unstable performance temperament?
I think the answer to this question is obvious. I am Fan #2. You are Fan #1. So you see to an outside rational observer who does not root for the Kings, which is 99.999% of the worlds population, my point of view carries more credibility than yours. So in closing you are outnumbered by about six billion people, lol.
But you and I are alike in one respect. We both want to see the Kings win. I am passionate Kings fan and I have not missed a game in a long time. The big difference is if I see a player on the team who lacks fundamentals, plays selfishly, does not learn from their mistakes, then this adds up over time. And ultimately there is a tipping point in which a player is not going to help you get to where you want to go: deeply into the playoffs on a perennial basis.
Petrie made that call recently on Spencer Hawes. JT is next in line, among others. If I am proven wrong, I will willingly say so. And frankly I hope I am wrong! Another difference between you and me, I do not hold onto my opinion like a life vest in a tsunami. I am willing to be wrong, I am not bound up in my ego, and I am receptive to differing and astute opinions.
Until then I have no intention of continuously bashing JT, something else you are wrong about. I have no interest in that. The whole idea does not appeal to me. I plan to enjoy the season, and invite all Kings fans to do the same!!!
As show of sincere gesture, I will put myself on a self-imposed moratorium for at least one month. No post from me will have the words “JT, Jason, Thompson” in them until December. Its not my intention to bash a guy continuously. I will let his play speak for itself. I will leave any criticism to others who are objective, and apparently daring, enough to speak out.
Peace and Go Kings.
P.S. I reserve the right to refer to said player as ‘guy in the 34 jersey’ ;)
I predict JT puts up 7/5 this year.
by bench_blob on Oct 25, 2010 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Isn't JT awesome?
I mean he is such a stud rebounder. Kicks Landry’s butt at rebounding all day. I was also really impressed with his defense against Kaman. Kaman really was giving DMC fits until JT came into the game and put a stop to that. Was cool to see that his game is improving so much.
P.S. We are organizing a JT fan club and you get a one month free membership.
I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...
"I do not hold onto my opinion like a life vest in a tsunami"
favorite line in a great, great post.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
But what happens when rational counterpoints cannot be levied?
Let me know when you are going to start issuing rational counterpoints as it pertains to Thompson – I await that eagerly.
And you are mistaken when you cast me as a fan that supports all players regardless of their flaws. The difference between you and me, as it pertains to Thompson, is that while we both agree that he has flaws, I am also willing to give him credit for what he does well – something that you seem unwilling or unable to do.
You see, you think that he has to be great or he has to suck. I think that there is a place in the middle, and that’s where JT sits.
Fan #1 is a centralist. He can look at one’s positives and negatives, and fashion an overall view of a player without resorting to hyperbole. Fan #2 is an extremist. He has to win an argument at any cost, and once his mind is made up, he will cease to be rational or listen to rational thought.
I am fan #1. You are fan #2. Peace right back at you.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
If you need assistance getting off that cross, let me know
Who would garner more credibility to an impartial observer of two fans to their favorite sports team: Fan #1 who adores all players, supports them regardless of their flaws, and lack of skill development, and spotty performance record, or Fan #2 who wants to see his team win just as badly, but is able to discern between players who can lead to team success versus those with a borderline set of basketball skills and unstable performance temperament?
Thing is, you’re actually neither of these fans, but I’d think of Section as Fan #2.
If you think the bolded area applies to you, that’s pretty laughable.
People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~ Rogers Hornsby
I have zero clue what is the definition of "beastly" and I don't see a ton of people saying he is either
What I do know is that he is a careet 15.4% true rebounding rate with a 15.5% true rebound rate last year. I also know there were at least 20 players in the league with a higher rebound rate than that (I don’t know the grand total because am an idiot and was only able to pull up the top 20 on basketball-reference) regardless of position (although obviously all of them are PFs and Cs anyway).
Is that beastly? Personally no I don’t think so. I do think it shows he is one of our best rebounders and not a bad rebounder and I think there is a lot more weight in those numbers than how you perceive him when you watch him play.
I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.
by wallywagon11 on Oct 25, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions
I have zero clue what is the definition of “beastly”
Beast·ly
adjective, -li·er, -li·est, adverb
–adjective
1.
of or like a beast; bestial.
2.
Informal . nasty; unpleasant; disagreeable.
–adverb
3.
Chiefly British Informal . very; exceedingly: It’s beastly cold out.
4.
British Informal . disagreeably; outrageously: beastly rude.
Use beastly in a Sentence
Origin:
1175–1225; ME beasteliche, later be ( e ) stly. See beast, -ly 1
—Related forms
beast·li·ness, noun
—Synonyms
2. abominable, hateful, vile, foul, mean, disgusting.
I see him get a lot of rebounds in his area.
Doesn’t that mean he is doing his job by establishing solid position. I thought half of rebounding was about putting yourself in the right “area” and keeping our man out of said location, but hey, what do I know?
"The Kings have nothing to lose but their games."
by SactoRyan on Oct 25, 2010 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Let me put it this way
I have zero clue of the likes of Kaman, Jefferson, or Hortford go up and get the tough rebound in traffic, hustle down the boards and beat their man to it at a higher rate than JT or below the rate he does or the same. What I do know is that they are all pretty solid rebounders given their rebound rates.
I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.
by wallywagon11 on Oct 25, 2010 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions
TS%
From what I’ve been told about True Shooting Percentage, I can only assume we’ll be benching Tyreke in favor of Head. Right?
Great job, Aykis.
Never forget, I'm an idiot.
by Exhibit G on Oct 25, 2010 1:45 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Hahahahahaha
G for the win.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I don't think the point of the small sample size was emphasized enough
It wasn’t just the small number of games, but the uneven amount of minutes and the unusual rotations. It’s really unrealistic to believe you can get any true analysis from these type of numbers.
Jeter played 145 minutes while Head only played 110, and Tyreke played 188. Jeter and Tyreke played with the starter more than Head, so how can their numbers be evaluated fairly.
As far as Donte, if you adjust the PT for 30 mpg, Casspi scores 10.9ppg, JT scores 10.4ppg and Donte scores 9.7ppg. Taking it one step further, adjusted for 30mpg, JT & Donte tied for 2nd in blocks per game at 1.10 and only are behind Hassan who would average 4.3. In Steals per 30 mpg, Donte is 2nd with .88spg to Carl’s .95 while Casspi is last among the front court players at .61.
I’m not trying to rank anyone with these numbers, only pointing out that the disparity in minutes played makes the small sample size even more unreliable. I believe that this is a time when you need to go by what you saw rather then by any set of numbers.
What I saw was our offense looked one dimentional. Omri looked only slightly better offensively than JT & Donte who seem to put up the occasional wild shot or pass. Both JT & Donte seem like better shot blockers than Cuz who’s having a hard time with bigtime NBA centers, and offers little weakside help defensively.
As the season starts, I’m much more concerned with our offense, then our defense or rebounding. So until Dalembert returns, I think the starting lineup needs to be determined by matchups, rather then any one skill set. And, the matchup that poses the biggest challenge in the Minny game is Love. I don’t believe either Carl or JT can match Love’s offense right now. So, it comes down to defense, so I’d go with Carl, Cuz & Donte. With the understanding that Cousins is only going to get 6 minutes per stretch and Hassan isn’t in game shape so he’ll have shorter stretchs than DeMarcus. That means JT sees most of his minutes coming at center.
As far as the SF position goes, Omri offers more scoring and rebounding but Donte offers more shotblocking and steals, which is the kind of help we need with DMC & Carl starting. But, if JT rotates in for Cuz, I could see PW rotating Omri in for Donte at the same time. At this point in the season, I don’t see any real advantage Offensively & Defensively which ever way we go because no one on the entire team has really stepped up.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
by HighTops on Oct 25, 2010 2:07 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Agree completely about the small sample size HT
But some things like rebounding, translate regardless of rotations.
Also, Cisco had a ridiculous block rate, 6 blocks in 4 games or something like that. Didn’t include him though.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
A point was made above that I find interesting.
Rebounds off of missed FT’s. Is there a corrolation between who sets up at the 1st position and who has the highest number of rebounds. I usually don’t pay much attention, but I assume that at 6’8 Landry doesn’t get the 1st position. And, I was looking at the tape of the Utah game and it seemed that Omri got half of his rebounds off of missed FT’s by our opponents.
I guess you could say that a rebound is a rebound, but when your given decent position and don’t have to fight or work for it, doesn’t the numbers look better than they actually are?
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
That IS an interesting question
How many are in game traffic opportunities and how many on the advantages of the 1st position on FTs. That could easily equal a few extra per game.
An analysis of play by play rundowns would answer that I suppose. Who wants a project?!
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions
In the GS game (Casspi didn't play against Utah)
NBA.com has him with 8 rebounds rather than nine, all defensive and two were off FTs, six off jumpers.
(I had to go through the play by play)
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Donte' had 5 rebounds, 4 on defense
1 offensive off missed Cisco shot
1 off FT
2 off jumpers
1 off Cousins block of Kaman
Casspi played 30 minutes, Donte 20. For whatever its worth.
If I have some time I’ll look at the JT vs Landry thing.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks for looking that up, and of course it was not Utah, I watched both tapes
In my case the mind wasn’t the first thing to go, but it was in the top 3.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
Don't you mean the Clippers,
Omri got 9 against GS. One on someone elses block, 2 off of FT, one off his own miss( the 1 offensive), and 5 defensive after a miss.
The 8 rebound game was in the 2nd Clips game.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
That is correct
The Clippers
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm worried about FTs - Again!
And general offensive efficiency, or even competance, as HT mentions above.
I think the D will really come around quite a bit.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
I am reminded
of Jason Thompson speaking to The Rise Guys back in June about Westphal’s focus on improving free throw shooting and reducing turnovers. My bet is that coach is going to become a very unhappy camper if the Kings continue to turn the ball over and miss free throws at their current rate.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
I remember
you’d thnk after saying that he’d have hopefully worked hard on FT’s in the summer, maybe he did, but although I haven’t seen his pre-season stats fully I’m guessing his FT % is baad.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm worried that we send our opponents to the FT line as often as we did last year
but so far in the preseason be shot more FT and made more FT than our opponents. As far as making a higher percentage, I think that the players that will go to the FT line the most, are in general good FT shooters except JT & Donte who are shooting 63%.
Tyreke, Beno, Cuz & Carl are solid, and Jeter & Cisco are up in the 80% range. I think we can survive with 70-75% average if we stop sending out opponent to the line before we even get into the penalty.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
Job exceedingly well done guys
Now do me proud and make a bigger deal out of these than is humanly possible
I knew you wouldn’t let me down.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
by Aykis16 on Oct 25, 2010 3:15 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
We skipped over that part :-)
You needed to use it as a break between each section I guess.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions
You know the season is about to start when...
Kings fans are at each others throats over preseason statistics, i.e. see the above threads.
Good God, I am glad the season is about to start and StR banter helps gear me up every time.
Umm... I thought we were officially referring to Voison as the Chick Replacing Amick at the Paper? or CRAP, for short.
Not gonna lie...
The words “Advanced Statistics” usually send me running in the other direction. I actually aced Statistics a few years back (literally got 105 outta 100 on three straight tests) but for whatever reason the advanced stuff often makes my eyes glaze over.
This post is the exception. Very interesting stuff and organized to be super easy to read.
This is semi-off topic, but I just feel the need to say that the editors/contributors (whatever the title is…) of StR are beyond amazing. Seriously, I just spent some time looking at a certain NFL blog of a team that shall not be named, and their writers/editors/contributors/mods/whatever they’re callled were so unbelievably biased and utterly unprofessional. I know that games are emotional, but I never see the writers/editors/etc of StR engaging in shit like that. You guys are always fair, always even-handed and are the first to admit when the Kings make mistakes. I really appreciate and admire the way you are able to put aside emotions and be really objective despite the fact that you’re obviously Kings fans. So in summary, StR is the best sports site on the Internet. The end.
"That was the most offensive thing I have seen in 20 years of teaching and that includes an elementary school production of "Hair.""
by Christina_J on Oct 25, 2010 8:17 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
105 out of 100? Is that statistically possible?
That’s like the time I had a six-pack of Guiness and I drank all 7 of them. ;)
by chandlerj on Oct 25, 2010 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Haha
I like to think the extra credit questions he put on the later tests was because I killed the curve. Literally. I was the only one above 100 on any of the tests (he did a rundown of grades in whatever ranges) so yeah….haha. Sucks to be my classmates in that class :-P
"That was the most offensive thing I have seen in 20 years of teaching and that includes an elementary school production of "Hair.""
Curves are rutheless.
"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!
by caseycheesecake on Oct 26, 2010 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions
They can be
They can also be beyond awesome, like in my psych class this semester. Outta 50 questions I’d be shocked if I got more than 40 right and yet on a curve I got a 48. Yay for those who bring down the curve! lol
"That was the most offensive thing I have seen in 20 years of teaching and that includes an elementary school production of "Hair.""
Yeah - I still need
league averages by position to really make any sense of how these numbers indicate good, mediocre or bad play.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 25, 2010 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Just a few thoughts on an old dead thread
First, great job as always Aykis.
Second, while I don’t think blob is objective on JT, it also doesn’t make him wrong necessarily. He and I have disagreed on other threads about the point but overall I’m coming to the conclusion that he’s not far off the mark. My belief is that as fans we over projected Shock and Hawes skill set, oh I don’t know……………kind of like a life vest in a tsunami, because we had a desperate need to improve and had nothing else to hang on to.
JT is looking like he is going to be a decent rotational big, a bench player who occasionally will give you a big night but overall will not be the second coming of Karl Malone or become the border line All – Star, we (myself included) were hoping for. He can be a starter on a bad team or a role player on a good one. He is a solid rebounder not a great one unless he is compared to a non rebounder. He is athletic, yet has a somewhat mechanical game. He plays a highly emotional game, is reactive and hasn’t seemed to learn a lot from his mistakes. I’m not saying that he can’t or won’t improve only that so far he is still playing pretty much the same game he entered the league with. I had been hoping for a lot more.
JT seems like a great guy and team mate but I won’t be surprised if he’s traded and won’t be that upset if he is. In short, not all different from what you would expect from most 12th picks. Barring injury he should have a long and somewhat productive NBA career providing a few more wins than an average replacement player.
I haven’t been commenting much this summer but will say that I thought in the main my take was that this threads gang bang of the blob was reactive and out of proportion to his initial comments and above all a highly personal attack. I’m not quite sure why but all in all I thought it was beastly wicked (great line Mustang) because despite his obvious prejudice against JT I have found his posts and comments to be full of good stuff, informative and well written.
"I make love to pressure" - Stephen Jackson
JT is looking like he is going to be a decent rotational big, a bench player who occasionally will give you a big night but overall will not be the second coming of Karl Malone or become the border line All – Star, we (myself included) were hoping for
Agreed 100%.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
good for you for calling out the gang bang
articulate post
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
I actually have to take exception with this
And I thought long and hard about just letting this go, but I can’t.
If I post that Tyreke Evans is not a good player because he turns the ball over too much, I’m going to anticipate that there is going to be a response. And when people respond back to me and show me all of the good things that Tyreke does, and my response is that he really, really turns the ball over too much, I’m going to anticipate that there is going to be a response. And when II have a history of making somewhat personal remarks (vague though they may be) during this and/or past conversations, I’m going to anticipate that there is going to be a response. And if several people disagree with me, I’m going to anticipate that I am going to hear it from each of them.
You see, a “gang bang” or “group think” would be an organized effort – one voice speaking on behalf of the entire group. But because there is no gang or group here, each person contributes individually, as was the case here.
Can the comments get out of hand? Certainly. But that is a gate that swings both ways. One can’t have an argument with oneself (schizo’s notwithstanding).
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Ewww! A gang bang that swings both ways.
Seriously though. I would have to agree completely.
Are some people’s opinion respected more and more likely to get agreement. Sure. Is there a dogpile every once in a while with a lot of agreement that somebody is way off? Yes, but that is not group think. To say anything else just dismisses the diversity and strength of StR.
I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...
My feelings on JT
His ceiling is to grow into that ideal first big off the bench, with an endless motor, ability to hit the glass, and not be a complete offensive liability. Almost like a taller Haslem. That’s the way I see JT. I don’t try to project him as a starter on a playoff team, but I think a lot of playoff teams would love to have him be the first big off the bench.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
Absolutely
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Oct 27, 2010 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions
Interesting placement, because he may not be the first big off the bench here.
And offensively, last season he evolved into more of a long 2 jump shooter after being more of a offensive boards and short range jump shooter his first year. Which seems to make it look like JT is a tweener, or more like not a center & not a PF.
He doesn’t have the post moves of a center, and can’t get to the rim & finish from 15ft like a PF. He’s too handsy to defend away from the basket, and cant seem to keep his man from backing him down and getting position in the paint to defend the center position. But, the one point that I have made from the beginning of his career, is that he relies too much on tipping the ball and not on going up and wrestling the ball out of the air from the opposition.
I really feel that JT & Donte are in the same boat. Both are great atheletes but their athleticism has allowed the KIngs to move them around so much, that neither has developed a true identity or role on this team. JT is no SF and yet PW had him defending Kirilenko at the SF even in the last game. Poor Donte had been asked to play every position from SG to center.
I know that the roster and injuries played a part in a lot of the player movement. But, atheletes like JT succeeded in college based on their physical talent and not on their skill sets. And, when your asked to play inside one year and outside the next. When your asked to play Center then PF then SF, and you haven’t developed the skills offensively or defensively for all of those positions, it’s easy to underachieve.
In a way I feel sorry for our young guys. If they had been drafted by a more stable team and allowed to develop at the one position to which they were the best suited, their careers could look a lot brighter than they do now. But, for now, I have no idea what their ceiling is. Although in JT’s case, if either Sammy or Carl resign with the team, JT won’t be the 1st big off the bench.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by 



















