Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Getting Better Without Tangible Results

Now that all hopes of a competitive season are gone, that the dreams of a dark horse playoff bid have been popped, we are left looking for progress. To date, none has been found. The brightest youngsters -- Tyreke Evans and DeMarcus Cousins -- have struggled. The question marks -- Donte Greene, Omri Casspi and Jason Thompson -- have struggled to maintain consistency. The veterans -- Carl Landry, Samuel Dalembert and Beno Udrih -- have been as flawed as they have been productive. The slog has been tough, and bleak.

But external changes are hard to envision, and it's certainly not clear the team would be helped by course alterations. That means trades, that means with the coaching staff. If the Kings make a big trade, they will have given up assets -- cap space or young players -- and potentially hurt the real future of the team, which obviously lies beyond Sacramento's record come April 15, 2011. If the Kings terminate Paul Wespthal, they aren't bringing in a big name at midseason, and it's unlikely they'll be able to recruit a big man in June after what looks to be a dreadful season, with no assurances of an improved roster for 2011-12 and beyond.

I take it that Geoff Petrie understands this, or at least believes it. His comments to The Bee's Jason Jones indicate as much. He will err on the side of caution as the Kings try to break through and register a heartbeat. That's smart, and the right thing to do. We all have our own set of angst-y feelings about Westphal -- some measured, some ... well, angst-y. But provided he is working hard to develop the Kings' young players and hold the kids accountable, he should be here. Provided those goals (and any goals Petrie has laid out) are met, there's literally nothing to lose in keeping him on board. The benefit could be whatever a measure of franchise consistency or stability provides.

Star-divide

Granted, some disagree that Westphal is fair about meting out "punishment" or minutes; others may think the inconsistent rotation has hurt the development of Greene, Casspi and/or Thompson. Those are valid concerns; I don't share them. Like section214, I feel that no player on this team is sacred right now. No one has won his starting spot, or rotation spot, and frankly, only a couple players have earned their freaking roster spot.

I am certainly guilty at times of misremembering the 2008-09 season, that 17-win travesty. I remember it as FAILURE precipitating CHANGE. But really, it was FAILURE precipitating CHANGE precipitating EVEN GREATER FAILURE. The Kings under Kenny Natt were so, so bad. So bad John Salmons had to be the sweetener to lose Brad Miller, and the Kings still had to take Andres Nocioni back! So bad the team had to engage in all manner of tiny trades to cut salary to prevent catastrophic losses in the ledger. So bad the team had to leave an able-bodied player -- Kenny Thomas -- home on road trips to save on hotel costs. Seriously.

That's embarrassing in retrospect, and the specter of such should send shivers down any fan's spine. I personally believe Mario Elie to be far more qualified than Natt to be a head coach, and I understand that even if he weren't, the idea of Tyreke Evans and DeMarcus Cousins playing out the season is much preferred to, say, Spencer Hawes and Bobby Jackson. Things can't go that wrong again. But they can go wrong-er than they are now, and for that, patience remains a virtue in Sacramento.

Comment 212 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ziller, always the voice reason.

But I’ve already begun using the NCAA to ease my pain from this Kings season. I can’t help but think how good some of these draft prospects will look in a Kings uni next year. It’s the only thing that keeps me optimistic. As a team you have to be good at what you do, nothing worse than being average. If you’re going to be good, be very good. If you’re going to suck, suck so bad that you end up with the Blake Griffins, the John Walls, or even the Tyreke Evans of the basketball world. If you’re bad but still average? Well then you’re just stuck with Ekpe Udohs and the Greg Monroes.

by glazier_25 on Dec 2, 2010 2:47 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for cheering me up!

Good god do I need a suprise win.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Dec 2, 2010 2:48 PM PST reply actions  

Any win would be a surprise about now.

At least the young’s are getting a lesson in adversity, rather than having success handed to them.

by jozyme on Dec 2, 2010 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Nice post.

Heres to hoping that after everything comes to a head , things will start to click.

by 9K1NGS6 on Dec 2, 2010 2:49 PM PST reply actions  

Holmdel shattered

his Ziller wants to get Westphaul fired conspiracies are ruined!

"Good Luck"

by TheFifthMookie on Dec 2, 2010 2:52 PM PST reply actions  

Smokescreen!

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Dec 2, 2010 2:57 PM PST up reply actions  

He is obviously abusing his forum

Keep Jason Thompson out of the damn fruit salad!

by prowseinthehouse on Dec 2, 2010 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Until he checked Ziller's twitter account

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

OMG

did you read what he had on there?!?! He’s got an agenda I tell you!!!!

"Good Luck"

by TheFifthMookie on Dec 2, 2010 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Hast to be rec'd

For the effective use of 3rd person, if nothing else.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Dec 2, 2010 6:06 PM PST up reply actions  

This post is sponsored by Rickey Henderson

Oh, and Samsung of course.

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~ Rogers Hornsby

by otis29 on Dec 2, 2010 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Holmdel is Westphal!

I hope you guys aren't trying to have me get a virus, thats f'd up - MarcusC

by slamson on Dec 2, 2010 5:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Turn the “M” upside down to make the “W”, the “d” upside down and backwards to make the “p”, squish the “l” down into an “s” and add a “t” and BAM!
it spells WeSTPhol. Then, just change the “o” to an “a”.

I’m off to go write the prequel to Angels and Demons.

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Dec 3, 2010 10:20 AM PST up reply actions   3 recs

LOL

that joke snuck up on me

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 10:31 AM PST up reply actions  

as Holmdel, I think this is hilarious

but as WeSTPhol, I’m getting a little neRVOus.

Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.

by Holmdel on Dec 3, 2010 11:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Seriously TZ

you have a gift of absorbing all thoughts and feelings from the Kings fan base and shaping them into a great organized post. That’s not a compliment, that’s an observation.

About the team… the present situation is not as bad as having the 17-win team and Natt as the coach. Things are much better now. I mean it. Having two – good to great – young players and 2-3 more decent ones and a great salary cap status is a BIG deal. We might be disappointed but the light is still bright at the end of the tunnel.

I would only say that the situation is worse than the Natt-era, if Tyreke’s contract was about to expire, because he would have nothing to hold him here.

The famous Presti model needed four top 5 picks. The Hawks needed four top 6 picks (3 of them were underachievers) + Joe Johnson (RFA) + Josh Smith at #16. What do we have for now? Two high picks, great picks actually (Tyreke and DMC)… and 3 more – at least – decent players picked at 12 (JT), 23 (Casspi) and 28 (Greene). We’re still two good players away from the playoffs and given that no one will gift us Gasol for Pooh and a 2015 pick, I think we have to “wait” for a couple of more top 5 picks and/or a good FA .

(This is not a pro-Westphal comment, thank you very much)

by ZenBaller on Dec 2, 2010 3:18 PM PST reply actions  

Patience??

     Not to rain on everyone’s parade, but here is our record for the last 5 years.
2006-2007 (33-49), 2007-2008 (38-44), 2008-2009 (17-65), 2009-2010 (25-57) and currently 4-12. Not one year over 500. I like GP, but he has had 4 years to get the ship on course and it looks like another year of the ship floating aimlessly at sea. So we get another high draft pick next year and we get 30-35 wins next year, and this may seem like a long shot because several of us (me included) thought this record was attainable this year. So 6 years of “rebuilding” and staying the course.
      Call me impatient, but 6 years is a long time to get things turned around. And before the question is asked “what would I like Petrie to do?”, if I gave that type of response to my customers I would be down at the EDD line. And if your response is his hands are tied, well then he tied them himself.

by noreboundsnorings on Dec 2, 2010 3:26 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

I disagree with a lot of this.

Not all these years were rebuilding. Not until the 08-09 season were the Kings even in rebuilding mode, and it wasn’t until they knew they had a top 4 pick in the 2009 draft that they were serious about the rebuilding effort.

Quite frankly, I’m not sure the Kings have failed at rebuilding. What Geoff Petrie and the Maloof’s delayed was the inevitable and that’s what the Kings are doing now. That’s a fair criticism, but one that means little at this point because GP & the Maloof’s have shown they will stick to a plan they are committed to.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 3:32 PM PST up reply actions  

and I should have read this

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Doesn't really hurt anybody for you to state something in your own way.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

The fact is there is no way to know how this will turn out.

Building a good team takes time and development. There is no quick fix to this problem. It seems like what you are hoping will happen is that we scrap everything so far and try to make a nonsensical, video game-like trade to get a superstar (which isn’t gonna happen), or go out and overpay for a player who will underachieve just because no one else will come out here. Reading the posts above, you look at teams like OKC and ATL who were bad for years. They held on to their young talent to develop them and got role players to surround them with and now they are pretty good teams. The patience will pay off and with a few more picks this team could make a jump. It takes time for these things to happen but usually its worth it.

Never Turn Back - Crush 40

by raiderking21 on Dec 2, 2010 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Come on

we didn’t really start the rebuild until 2008. Don’t get me wrong, I am not a fan of some of the 06-08 moves but let’s not pretend that was part of the rebuild.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think you are wrong.

…and I REALLY like Petrie.

It seems to me that he is an outstanding evaluator of offensive talent, but doesn’t spot (or undervalues) defensive talent in young, developing players.

He typically covers for these shortcoming through effective trades. Think about it though, have we drafted a single defensive stud? I can’t think of one.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Why is not drafting a defensive stud such a big deal? Explain your reasoning. I'd love to hear it, and I'm not being sarcastic.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

It isn't necessarily.

In the past he has ‘fixed’ this issue through trades.

It IS a problem now as we don’t have a stopper of any kind, nor do we play good team defense.

I wasn’t trying to throw Petrie under the bus at all – read my posts, I LIKE Petrie. I’m just making an observation.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Once you establish a core and identify them as your core...

…perhaps finding players to augment them as defensive guys would be the next step.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 4:34 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I'll buy that.

Question: How much more time do you give PW to identify a core and reduce his rotation?

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:54 PM PST up reply actions  

As much time as it takes.

I don’t know if you can specify a set amount of time to identify the core. You’ll know when you have it and right now the Kings don’t have a core.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 6:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Yuh.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 10:06 AM PST up reply actions  

My two cents

and that is probably all it is worth.

I dont see how drafting a defensive stud makes us a good defensive team. Dally is one of the best shot blockers in the last decade, we are no better defensively. Our team defense sucks ass. One player is not going to change that.

by MichaelMack on Dec 2, 2010 4:59 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

There is this point too. Rec'd Mike.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 6:38 PM PST up reply actions  

And we have guys who are geared offensively who can't stop anybody right now.

That’s the problem with this team.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 9:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Isn't this a paradox

Last season we scored 108 in our wins and 97 pts in our loses. Who are the major players from last year who aren’t here any more? Hawes and Noc, and Martin who only played 22 games last season.

So unless you consister Udoka, May, Brockman, Mason, Thomas, Temple, Armstrong, Dorsey & McGuire great offensive players, we basicly have the same offensive players we had at the end of last Feb. when we averaged 100 ppg, last March when we averaged 96 ppg, and April when we averaged 101 ppg.

So, maybe they all forgot how to score, or maybe there’s some other reason.

I’m not saying it wouldnt be great to upgrade a couple of our players and bring in better scorers who are better all around players. But, maybe our players are better than they seem, but just don’t run the offense well, or maybe the offense isn’t that great for the talent we have.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 3, 2010 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Here is a bit of brilliance:

But, maybe our players are better than they seem, but just don’t run the offense well, or maybe the offense isn’t that great for the talent we have.

I think that is completely true. So do we go find players who can play good offense under Westphal’s system, or do we find a coach who can utilize our players strengths?

by MichaelMack on Dec 3, 2010 5:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Carl has a TS% of 54.7% and the league average for PF is 65%

In Houston, Carl shot around 70% at the rim. This year Carl is 68% at the rim. DeMarcus’ TS% is is 47% but he shoots 72.5% at the rim. Is there anyone who’s seem them play that doesn’t believe that they can shot at a high percentage at the rim?

So, why is Carl averaging 6 shot outside of 10ft and only 2.8 at the rim. And, why is Cousins only averaging 2.5 at the rim?

Maybe we’re a bad offensive team because we don’t get the ball to players in spots where they can be successful.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 3, 2010 7:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Gerald Wallace sure blows on defense

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 5:08 PM PST up reply actions  

the only thing that worries me...

is that the kings haven’t had a track record of developing any young players. i dont know if that is coaching, opportunity, or the players themselves. but who was the last player that got a lot better on the kings?

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Dec 2, 2010 6:17 PM PST up reply actions  

only one i can think of is kevin martin.

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Dec 2, 2010 6:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Kevin Martin

Other than that … Donte Greene (what he was better last year!), Kevin Martin, John Salmons, Peja, Corliss, Brian Grant, and Bibby?

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 6:22 PM PST up reply actions  

ug major fail with hedo

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 6:39 PM PST up reply actions  

umm...

cisco seems like the same player he was in college.
thompson, still incredibly inconsistent and has trouble finishing at the basket.
salmons and bibby were vets.
corliss?
brian grant was only here like a year or two right? then he went and got really good on portland.

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Dec 3, 2010 8:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Depends on your definition of "stud"

because there are only 4-5 in the league at a time and they are usually a top lottery pick (Duncan, Camby, Howard, Olajuwon) or one of the millions of flawed, athletic later picks who find their niche (Artest, Ben Wallace, Dennis Rodman).

However, Petrie did draft Brian Grant, Abdul-Wahad (pretty good defender till he blew out his knee in Denver) and Gerald Wallace.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Dec 3, 2010 12:58 AM PST up reply actions  

How many "defensive studs" come out of every draft?

Less than 1?

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Dec 3, 2010 10:23 AM PST up reply actions  

2,3,8 or even 11 sometimes.

Defensive studs are everywhere if you just look for them!

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 10:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Recommended

for saying things that are just pure common sense. Low expectations produce low results.

"Not new here and there is a core that believes they have the only opinion that matters, and they feel that their opinions are the only correct ones. ... Go against the grain and have an opinion different than the rest of the good ole boy club and they come out swinging trying to dismantle you and your opinions… and not in a mature debate fashion either, like elementary school."

by NewEraKings on Dec 2, 2010 11:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Low expectations produce low results?

Weren’t there low expecations last year with Oklahoma? Weren’t there low expectations the year Brandon Roy was a rookie for the Blazers? Weren’t there low expectations for the Grizzlies back in the Hubie Brown days? Weren’t there low expectations for the Jazz the year after Malone and Stockton left? Weren’t there low expectations when the Knicks lost Patrick Ewing for the playoffs and went to the finals? Weren’t there low expecations for the Bucks last year? Weren’t there low expectations for the Rockets last year without Yao? Weren’t there low expecations for the aging Spurs this year? Weren’t there low expecations for the Pacers this year? Weren’t there low expecations for the Hornets this year?

Weren’t there high expecations for the Pistons when they traded for AI? Wasn’t there 70 game winning expecations for the Heat this year? Weren’t there high expecations for the Knicks when they traded for Marbury?

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 8:24 AM PST up reply actions   3 recs

For example -

The 2010 San Francisco Giants. Nobody expected them to do anything and…oops, that doesn’t support this theory at all. Nevermind.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Dec 3, 2010 8:34 AM PST up reply actions  

The Small Sample Size Institute (SSSI)

approves this comment.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Dec 3, 2010 8:36 AM PST up reply actions  

That’s small sample size due to Steroids

Founder of team Omté Caspeen

by Widowwolf on Dec 4, 2010 12:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Heck

One could argue our 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 records were because of high expectations that lead us to do stupid stuff those years and the years prior.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 9:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Mark me down as a FIRM believer in the damage of inconsistent (or non-existent) rotation.

A coach can’t fix anything with young players by jerking their minutes around constantly. This only frustrates them and makes them timid.

I have really not seen Westphal take anyone out for a minute – just enough to teach them something but not being angry, but by talking to them during the game and making a point. Tyreke especially needs this. He doesn’t need no leash as he has some pretty bad habits, but he needs less than a reprimand. He needs to learn. I just don’t see any teaching at all. This is true of all of the young players.

Many of us have complained about PW’s rotations, but consider how ridiculous they are. Phil Jackson (I KNOW he has stars) is a master at defining roles. He typically has an 8 man rotation. The two biggest players get around 40 minutes a game. The next two get low 30s. One gets mid-high 20s and the bench players get 15-18. The rest of the bench doesn’t play.

Consider PW. Against Indiana Evans led us with 34 minutes, Udrih played 30. After that Thompson had the most with 24. That is amazing. SIX other players played at least 20 minutes!!!
This is actually proof that there IS no rotation. IMO this is just garbage coaching. Too many here excuse coaching on youth. My question is what are you teaching??? Instability?

If you are incapable of making decisions after 100+ games, then you just can’t do it. The only other view that would support the complete gridlock is to assume that Petrie has done a very poor job of drafting – that is a view that I do not have.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 3:31 PM PST reply actions  

sorry

this was actually meant as a joke. didn’t realize it read so harsh.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I think most of us got it anyways.

Well, I laughed at it… maybe that makes me harsh. Oh well.

Never Turn Back - Crush 40

by raiderking21 on Dec 2, 2010 3:56 PM PST up reply actions  

It's cool.

I don’t get your point though.

I can’t think of ANY good coach that uses as much of his bench for as many minutes as Westphal. He has SEVEN players getting 20+ minutes a game currently, and that doesn’t include the two that get 30 mins. That is ludicrous. Even Phoenix, which plays a ridiculous pace, only has three guys playing between 20 and 30. Same with NY. Dantoni’s rotation is smaller.

Jerry Sloan, Larry Brown, Rick Adelman None of them do it.

Popovich plays his starters shorter minutes, but even he has 4 guys getting more than 30, and some of that is age.

I’m telling you – NOBODY has a deeper and broader rotation than us. It is completely stupid.

We can agree that this season will stink from a record standpoint, so why not actually start developing some sense of team?

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I think for Westphal to do what you are asking

It requires Petrie to trade some of our breadth of talent for some depth of talent. But that’s not likely until the summer time comes around.

" 1 + 1 = 3 " - David Kahn

by Shizzo on Dec 2, 2010 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

It is chicken and the egg.

How is Petrie supposed to know what Westphal needs/wants if the team has no identity?

It goes back to my posts from the last couple of days. I don’t believe that the ownership believes in Westphal enough to invest in him. That being the case, there is no acquisition that makes sense as Petrie can’t know what the next coach will need.

This flop is a bi-product of no leadership. The Maloofs simply have to open their pocketbooks and get a coach who is empowered to make moves.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

So in otherwords you don't want to wait out rebuilding huh?

Well, you clearly disagree with the Maloof’s on that. Because they are doing exactly that.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I think you are completely incorrect.

I don’t agree with you premise about rebuilding in the least. We have BEEN rebuilding. The product is crap. We look far worse with MORE talent than we did last year.

Just so you know – I have been more than patient. I attended the Kings’ first game in Sacramento. I attended the last game that Mitch Richmond was at home. I have stuck with them through it all. I am not impatient.

Why won’t you acknowledge that there is something wrong?

Frankly, I don’t care what the Maloofs say. What are they going to say, “Time to give up on us, this think stinks….?” Of course not. I know what I am seeing on the court. You can rebuild without being uncompetitive and stupid.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Of course not. I know what I am seeing on the court. You can rebuild without being uncompetitive and stupid.

Here’s the rub though: what have they done in the last two years that was incompetent and stupid?

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

personally, not the biggest fan of the Westphal signing and the Kevin Martin trade

but hardly see either as incompetent

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Retained Westphal. Not signed a deep shooter.

He has done nothing to retain this job.

The shooting hole has been completely obvious since Martin was shipped.

I realize that this is just my opinion.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:59 PM PST up reply actions  

What did he do last year to lose his job?

You honestly think we underperformed last year?

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 5:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I am guessing you meant

guaranteeing the third year of Westphal’s contract, not retaining him.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 5:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree that he didn't anything especially worrisome.

However, he didn’t do anything outstanding either.

Add in what the team looks like now and I have serious problems. My very biggest issue is rotation. I honestly see no plan.

What kind of team are we? I can’t believe after over 100 games we can’t answer that question.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 10:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Let me ask you something: Who do you think is really enjoying what's going on with this team?

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 10:59 AM PST up reply actions  

all the other teams

Founder of team Omté Caspeen

by Widowwolf on Dec 4, 2010 12:17 AM PST up reply actions  

There might be some confusion here between you and I Hoops Mike

Me

Here’s the rub though: what have they done in the last two years that was incompetent and stupid?

You

Retained Westphal. Not signed a deep shooter.

Are you saying it was stupid or incompetent of the Maloofs to have retained Westphal for this year or did you really mean it was stupid or incompetent of the Maloofs to guarantee the third year of his contract this past off season?

I have a very very hard time seeing how one could call it stupid or incompetent for them to have retained him for this year, which is what I thought you meant at first and then after your second comment here. Just want to make sure.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Desperation rarely serves any team well.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 11:01 AM PST up reply actions  

I see nothing desperate in firing Westphal.

This season is probably not going anywhere. Next year if we are at this same place it will be one hell of a lot more desperate.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 11:06 AM PST up reply actions  

Let me use a medical analogy here.

Do you treat the disease or the symptom? Firing Westphal is the symptom. The question is: What is the disease?

The problem isn’t Westphal. The problem that is the underlying issue of all this squabbling is that fans are really split on what the issue’s are. Therefore the split on solutions too.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 11:09 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree partially.

We have some systemic problems here IMO. I DO think Westphal is a large part of the problem. It doesn’t mean that I am correct. Maybe he gets this thing turned around, I just wouldn’t bet on it. I think the Maloofs have been reluctant to spend for a coach. I think that is a problem. Not hiring Larry Brown when it appeared that he was very willing to take the job was a poor decision.

Certainly our youth is an issue, but young teams have played well in the past with a good coaching performance. I concede that it isn’t a given, but you would at least like to see positive growth.

Why are you so convinced that Westphal isn’t the problem?

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 12:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not convinced of anything.

I’m not sure making a change in early December solves anything. If you want to fire Westphal next summer, than okay. But to me you judge growth over a season and not in a 16 game span.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 1:40 PM PST up reply actions  

I disagree with your opinion abour firing Westphal

Mainly because I do not believe that makes us better in the short or long term. It is not like there is someone who is going to come in and make these guys significantly better or increase their individual growth as players this year.

I do believe the team is under achieving a little this year, but not much.

by markdog333 on Dec 3, 2010 11:16 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

OK.

I think it definitely makes us better in the long term. In fact I think it will be a miracle if Westphal gets a second contract.

I agree that it probably wouldn’t have a huge effect on our record this year.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 12:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Look - I was just making a point.

I would fire Westphal, but if folks want more proof – fine. I do think the issue with the shooting needs was dumb – and obvious.

My broader point is you can go through rebuilding and show increasing progress. That is not what we have despite us being in ‘rebuild’ mode.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 11:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Just wanted to clarify but now I am really confused

If it were stupid or incompetent for them to have retained PW for this year I would think it would have been so clear that we would have heard everyone this past offseason calling for the firing of PW immediately. Heck if it was so stupid and incompetent of a decision shouldn’t there have been a growing number of people calling for his firing in June? I dunno maybe you warned us around draft time about how the Kings should fire PW but I just don’t remember it.

Really odd to use this year’s results to show how incompetent a decision it was given this year had not happened yet.

Now I can definitely understand arguing it was a stupid move to guarantee his 3rd year, I’ll give you that because it seemed kind of unnecessary pretty much the day after it was announced but apparantly that is not what you are saying.

And you are right, we can definitely show increasing progress while rebuilding and we aren’t. We clearly needed a SF this past offseason who can shoot. Personally though I don’t think it is not necessarily stupid or incompetent to hold off on spending around $7 million a year for the likes of Outlaw though. Not saying I am happy with the losing but I understand holding off last offseason on going all in during an insane free agency period where a ton of teams had cap room and a new CBA on the horizon.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 11:10 AM PST up reply actions  

Now I can definitely understand arguing it was a stupid move to guarantee his 3rd year, I’ll give you that because it seemed kind of unnecessary pretty much the day after it was announced but apparantly that is not what you are saying.

I think a big part of this was that Geoff Petrie didn’t want to create a lame duck scenario where firing a head coach was a simple solution. He wanted Paul Westphal around for the 3rd season regardless of how this season played out.

I really believe that more than ever.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 11:13 AM PST up reply actions  

absolutely it was trying to avoid the lame duck scenario. You see it all the time.

Personally though I thought PW was kind of screwed either way though given the team wasn’t going to spend.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 11:15 AM PST up reply actions  

Right.

Maybe Petrie thought it was wise for the team to not spend money, retain PW and put the screws to him this time in 2011 if it’s continuing.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 11:16 AM PST up reply actions  

ug, brainfart

I actually kind of doubt whether PW is staying nomatter what. It was solely

PW did okay first year + we might be okay this year so let’s not make him a lame duck + hell if he screws it up in the grand scheme of things it is only one year more and not terribly expensive.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 11:16 AM PST up reply actions  

I think Petrie sort of anticipated tough times this season.

Or anticipated the call to fire PW. It happens a lot around the league. Jim O’Brien is an excellent example of this.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 11:19 AM PST up reply actions  

I JUST said I was making a point.

Throw out what I said and forget it. Jesus!!!

I just stated that you can rebuild and not look horrible.

I agree with the rest, although there were shooters that were free agents who we didn’t appear to make a play for. It doesn’t mean that we absolutely didn’t – I admit.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 11:42 AM PST up reply actions  

I just stated that you can rebuild and not look horrible.

And, that’s your basis for thinking PW should be fired? Because it’s possible to rebuild and not look horrible? That kind of logic seems petty to me.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 11:48 AM PST up reply actions  

I will say though Pook

if PW can’t fix it and the same problems keep popping up, whether it is fair or not, I could care less if the Kings decide to fire him or not.

Granted I hardly see the team winning with another coach managing this current roster, but I don’t think it’s much of a risk either way to be honest. Even if it’s all on the players and he is a wonderful coach who just got screwed with a bad group of guys, I doubt they are going to be listening to him much after this season anyway if this keeps up.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 12:11 PM PST up reply actions  

I was trying to understand your point Hoops Mike, that's it. I'm sorry but it confused me and I was just trying to give you a little rope is all.

I should point out though, in regards to what I wrote …

although there were shooters that were free agents who we didn’t appear to make a play for. It doesn’t mean that we absolutely didn’t – I admit.

I never said we actually did make a play on any shooters if that is what you thought I said. I actually meant (believe it or not) that for the most part I am glad the Kings did not make a play for shooters even though it was a need. I am glad the Kings never went after Outlaw even if I believe they need a SF who can shoot. I am also not terribly upset about not making a play out Morrow given I feel Tyreke is going to be a SG anyway, plus no way Morrow comes here unless he got paid a lot more than in NJ because he seems to have only taken the short term NJ deal because he knew he would get minutes (I have a hard time seeing him being sure he woudl get minutes here wtih Beno, Garcia, and Evans but that do I know).

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 12:02 PM PST up reply actions  

ug

at the end — “but what do I know”

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 12:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Fair enough.

I don’t even disagree with you necessarily. If they believed that the roster would be OK – a reasonable belief – then their lack of offseason movement is explained. (I actually was of the opinion that they should vastly overpay Ray Allen for a short-term deal for the very reasons that we needed shooting, backcourt play-making, and certainly leadership. Do I think he would have taken a 2 year deal for 25 million? – probably not – but I would have liked to see a public attempt.)

This would not have effected our ability to resign our pending FAs, and would have expired by the time we need to worry about Tyreke and DMC.

Just ideas – but like you, what do I know? That is why we are posting on a blog….;-)

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 12:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Heck

I see you make a comment about PW coaching a bad game on November 3, 2010 and then voicing concerns on November 10, 2010. I don’t see anything about firing him last June so again I am a little confused.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 11:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Okay so you're not impatient (even though your opinions and tone very much give off the impression that you're impatient--but you're not impatient so you're not impatient okay? Have we got that settled!)

I HAVE acknowledged that there are things wrong. I disagree with you about taking drastic measures. Excuse the shit out of me for thinking that 21 year olds showing their age in the toughest profesional league of the sport, that has no sympathy, and is tougher on young players than any other professional league in other sports, requires some kind of curve if things aren’t going perfectly as much of us were hoping. Excuse me for thinking that the world and sky isn’t falling around me.

 Shit I was wrong. Nevermind. Just fire Westphal and the sky won’t fall anymore.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 4:41 PM PST up reply actions  

They took a full four years to rebuild

counting from when they were the Sonics. This is our second year. That’s all pookey is saying.

by VenomySnicket on Dec 2, 2010 6:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Eh they really didn't start rebuilding until the Durant draft

I don’t think drafting Sene in 06 counted as much of a rebuild. Kind of the Spencer Hawes equivalent.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 6:52 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd take Spencer Hawes over Sene any day of the week

I agree with Wally that Seattle didn’t start the rebuilding process till the Durant draft. Getting rid of Allen was the biggest hurdle, as well as clearing out those contracts.

Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Dec 2, 2010 9:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep.

I say it started with Durant.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 6:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Why are you so defensive?

You have been asking me continually about my opinion (that is all it is), and I have been answering, but you seem to twist my frustration with the team to frustration with you.

I’m not saying YOU are dumb. We just disagree.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 5:02 PM PST up reply actions  

When you tell me why I won't acknowledge that there is something wrong when I have said what I think is wrong in multiple places and ways...

…..yeah, I get a bit defensive. Mostly I’m tired of your self aggrandizing like this team is devaluing your self worth. Get over it already.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 6:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Once again you feel the need to insult me.

Do me a favor and don’t respond to my posts, and in return I won’t respond to yours. If you feel the need to keep making it personal, I can be every bit as unpleasant as you are.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 10:28 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm not really insulting you.

If you feel insulted by it, well okay. it is insulting no question. I’m just not sure there is any way to have a conversation with you that won’t insult you at some point.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 11:03 AM PST up reply actions  

???????

You state that you are not really insulting me, and then go on to post that is “is insulting, no question.”

You can absolutely have a conversation with me, but is there a need to say “Mostly I’m tired of your self aggrandizing like this team is devaluing your self worth. Get over it already.”

??

What the hell are you talking about? I don’t have any vested interest in the team aside from entertainment and interest in basketball. That coupled with my being a native of Sacramento.

I just don’t agree with YOU.

Argue with my posts. You don’t know me in the least, so it seems foolish to project some psychological meaning on to my posts on a fan site.

Just saying.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

I am arguing with your posts. Duh.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 11:19 AM PST up reply actions  

NO.

If you addressing something beyond the substance of the post, you are NOT simply addressing the post.

"Mostly I’m tired of your self aggrandizing like this team is devaluing your self worth. Get over it already."

This is clearly not addressing my argument, it is addressing ME.

Let me ask you – will you ever concede that you are incorrect? (I’m not saying that you are regarding this coaching discussion) How about that regardless of your intended purpose , something you say could reasonably be taken badly. Is this always the fault of the respondent, or do you bear any responsibility?

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 11:52 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Let me ask you – will you ever concede that you are incorrect?

Nope. NEENER NEENER NEENER!

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 1:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Interesting

I can’t think of ANY good coach that uses as much of his bench for as many minutes as Westphal. He has SEVEN players getting 20+ minutes a game currently, and that doesn’t include the two that get 30 mins. That is ludicrous.

This year the Kings have been playing two guys at least 30 minutes and seven guys at least 20 minutes. Last year it was 4 guys over 30 (Kevin and Carl were not on the team at the same time obviously) and 3 guys over 20 minutes for most of the season with Garcia rocking over 20 minutes but only 28 games played and Nocioni just barely under 20.

Hate to break it to you but plenty of good coaches have played their bench as many minutes as PW has (not to say I am completely happy with PW’s rotation or strategy though). For instance, Popovich who you already mentioned but you said it was just because of age this year. Sorry but the guy has always done it. Check out his “ludicrious” use of the bench in 06-07 when they won their last championship. Three guys with at least 30 minutes, three at least 20, and then Elson at 19 minutes, Oberto over 17 and Horry over 16.

Heck look at the Jazz last year. Two guys over 30 minutes (plus Ronnie Brewer before he was traded), five over 20, and Korver at over 18.

Hube Brown back in 03-04 with the Grizzles was my favorite. One guy over 30 minutes, 7 guys over 20 minutes, with Bo Outlaw and Stromile Swift rocking over 19 minutes.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 5:06 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think the problem is necessarily how many guys and how many minutes

but rather some consistency in the minutes. The Spurs team you mention, for example, I doubt if Horry played 30 minutes some nights and got a DNP others to average 16 minutes a game. He probably had a general band of minutes he played based on matchups and game situations, but the point is, he had a role.

It’s hard to compare a young team to the Spurs, but in any case, Westphal has to begin to develop some identity, and I think that begins with some semblance of a rotation.

"Not new here and there is a core that believes they have the only opinion that matters, and they feel that their opinions are the only correct ones. ... Go against the grain and have an opinion different than the rest of the good ole boy club and they come out swinging trying to dismantle you and your opinions… and not in a mature debate fashion either, like elementary school."

by NewEraKings on Dec 2, 2010 11:10 PM PST up reply actions  

That is easier to do

when you have a core of Duncan, Parker and Ginobli. Our core is Tyreke…and that is basically it. Westhpal doesn’t know what he is going to get from anyone else on any given night.

by markdog333 on Dec 3, 2010 7:51 AM PST up reply actions  

That isn't entirely true

he knows he is going to get steady offense and poor defenst from Beno, and steady defense and poor offense from Sammy.

by markdog333 on Dec 3, 2010 7:52 AM PST up reply actions  

yeah I think you are right, it is more of a consistency issue than minutes

I was only addressing the minutes stuff Hoops Mike brought up.

I must admit I am not a fan of the DNPs to starter to DNP stuff but I will say though that we knew going into the season that if Dalembert didn’t help the defense then we would have a better understanding of whether our guards who are allowing penetration might be the problem defensively so I am not terribly shocked we have seen all kinds of changes in regards to Beno, Head, and Garcia. We also knew that SF was a huge black hole for the Kings so I get how those two positions in particular have had a lot of changes game in and game out.

That being said though, the rotations have been fairly wacky when we see Greene sit for games and all of a sudden he is thrown into 30 minutes a night and what not. I dunno, I guess even though I am not terribly happy with the situation I feel we need to also acknowledge PW is in a tough spot. I personally would give him a little more breathing room on this only because I feel there is plently of time to terminate him if it continues to go wrong.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 8:17 AM PST up reply actions  

You found two individual seasons - congrats!

Kudos on the 03-04 Grizzlies. You must have really had to search for that. I will point out that Hubie wasn’t a very good coach. He had 5 winning seasons in 13 seasons. The season you pointed out was tied for his best. Still – nice find.

Last Year’s Jazz is interesting as well, although they had guys much closer to 30 minutes than 20, and Wesley Matthews likely would have had 30 per as he only started 48 games as he replaced Brewer. Still, it is a flatter rotation. That really isn’t a typical Sloan distribution, but certainly it is closer to what I am criticizing.

Your Popovich use of 06-07 isn’t remotely comparable. 6 vs. 9. I must not understand math but it sounds like the distribution of minutes over 20 per game applied to 50% of Pops team but 75% of PW’s. Hardly apples-to-apples.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Um, okay?

Your Popovich use of 06-07 isn’t remotely comparable. 6 vs. 9. I must not understand math but it sounds like the distribution of minutes over 20 per game applied to 50% of Pops team but 75% of PW’s. Hardly apples-to-apples.

Interesting, so I am guessing then that the Kings minute distrbutions last year were perfectly okay with you (8 vs. 6 on the arbitraty scale … oh God 50% versus 66.7% on the arbitrary scale! Not apples to apples! Screw the fact that one can clearly see that Popovich was rocking 11 man rotations the whole year, all that matters is the 20 and 30 minute marks!). If you are only worried about this year it should clear up some as the season goes along.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 12:30 PM PST up reply actions  

“If you are only worried about this year it should clear up some as the season goes along.”

I hope so!

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 1:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Don't get me wrong Hoops Mike

Not many good coaches tend to yank guys from the starting lineup to the DNP to the starting lineup with 30 minutes two weeks later. I just don’t get the point of criticizing him for giving a lot of guys minutes because that does in fact happen.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I've been

FratellOwned again!!

"Good Luck"

by TheFifthMookie on Dec 2, 2010 3:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Its really hard to have a consistent rotation when none of your players are consistent.

I agree PW has been really unorthodox with his rotation, but, given the state of the players’ games as of late, its hard to justify giving a solid consistent role to anyone on this team. Having minutes fluctuate obviously doesn’t help, but I just don’t see how PW is the only guilty one out of this situation.

Never Turn Back - Crush 40

by raiderking21 on Dec 2, 2010 3:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Seriously???

That is what a coach is FOR.

A coach isn’t there is roll out a ball and let the players determine who the starting five will be. He is there to mold something.

I’m not saying that PW is the only person in the organization who is to blame. Certainly there are others, but as far as the product on the floor, you can’t blame all of the confusion on a bunch of 20-24 year olds.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:14 PM PST up reply actions  

It isn't blame.

It’s a reason for the struggles. Don’t you get the subtle difference that is implying?

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think the difference is subtle at all.

Westphal isn’t blaming anyone in setting a rotation.

For instance, putting Landry on the bench is not a demotion – it is needing scoring punch off the bench. It is his MINUTES that matter.

That is not what Westphal is doing.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:26 PM PST up reply actions  

So you're saying it's Westphal's job to carve out a starting 5 when there are about 10 players with similar talent and production levels. Right?

That’s what you seem to be saying anyway.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

YES.

If need be, that is exactly what I am saying.

There has to be a framework before you can even truly evaluate.

BTW, we do not have 10 players with similar talent. Not at all. That is a complete cop out which just bails out the coach. We are lacking a defensive stopper (Udoka, Wright – fail) and certainly a good deep shooter. The shooter was apparent for the entire off-season. Personally I lobbied hard for Ray Allen and was cool with Anthony Morrow as an option. (There was certainly no guarantees that we could have had either – I was frustrated by the apparent lack of effort to acquire them – as far as I could tell, which doesn’t mean much)

Aside from those shortcomings we have as diverse a roster as most other teams.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Ray Allen and Anthony Morrow were willing to come here during the off-season?

I didn’t know that.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I believe I posted my lack of knowledge about the reality about that above.

If you are going to be critical of my posts (which is fine), please at least read them.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Okay. I read your post completely and totally.

Ray Allen and Anthony Morrow WANTED to come here and said so via their twitter account and 8 newspaper accounts right? And it’s Geoff Petrie and the Maloof’s fault for not shouting it from the rooftops in 100 + degree heat to let you know that they were going to acquire Ray Allen and Anthony Morrow. Give the Maloof’s credit: They wanted to shout from the rooftops in Sac about acquiring Allen or Morrow but found the logistics a bit difficult given that they were at the Palms.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

I honestly don't even understand your point.

Do you know that they DID try?

I already acknowledged that I don’t know.

In addition, I’d say it was likely that they didn’t as Morrow didn’t appear to have lots of suitors (nor am I sure he would have been what we needed – not a great defender) and we didn’t sign a shooter of any kind until we got Head at the very last minute when no other team wanted him.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 5:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Hoops Mike

You shouldn’t argue with pookey, don’t you know he’s part of the good ol boys lol

I hope you guys aren't trying to have me get a virus, thats f'd up - MarcusC

by slamson on Dec 2, 2010 5:25 PM PST up reply actions  

There are lots of reasons to not argue with Pookey.

Being a part of the much-touted but non-existent “good ol’ boys” is not one of them.

Profanity, frustration, unwillingness to read 5k word posts, and his pretty clear understanding of the CBA are the reasons I would have cited.

StR Token Female

by LeaguePassAddict on Dec 2, 2010 5:50 PM PST up reply actions  

You forgot to add that I'm always right to your reasons.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 2, 2010 6:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Or at least you think you are

But thats all that matters right? Even I’ve read this blog long enough to know not to argue with pookey.

Never Turn Back - Crush 40

by raiderking21 on Dec 2, 2010 8:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I knew you were going to agree.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 6:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Oh.

Then don’t argue with pookey. His idea of civility is not putting his f-bombs in all caps.

:-)

StR Token Female

by LeaguePassAddict on Dec 3, 2010 12:50 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Or one of the ways anyway.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 1:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Pookey has been quite polite and entertaining this year

though being a Pookey fan, perhaps I am biased. He and I disagree on most players on the team and rarely have a cross word.

by MichaelMack on Dec 3, 2010 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

He has been pretty polite

Pretty damn disappointing. I can’t even get a proper bitchfest going with him anymore.

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~ Rogers Hornsby

by otis29 on Dec 3, 2010 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I will argue with anyone if it is civil.

I think argument is fun. It is just basketball – it isn’t like any of this is actually important.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 10:32 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm also not saying PW is not to blame nor am I putting all the blame on the young players.

What I am saying is that it seems difficult for a coach to forge an identity with this team.

It doesn’t excuse his funky rotations and inconsistent minute distribution, but I don’t think that it is fair to place a larger blame on him than on the players and vice versa.

The execution that these players lack has more to do with knowledge of the playbook than rotations. Though that’s just my opinion. Your guess is as good as mine since we don’t know what these players think themselves.

Never Turn Back - Crush 40

by raiderking21 on Dec 2, 2010 8:26 PM PST up reply actions  

The issue of rotation instability is probably the most important, I agree

How can you perform as a player when you don’t have a sense of stability for at least 4-5 matches? You can’t. “Will the coach DNP me for 5 games like Donte?” I bet that goes on in a lot of players minds.

by ZenBaller on Dec 2, 2010 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

No kidding.

It isn’t even just a matter of getting DNP’d, it is that I can go from starter to DNP, or vice versa. It is crazy.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:16 PM PST up reply actions  

It’s a good article and I agree with the premise that trading away the young core is a mistake…

However, we aren’t going to sign any free agent difference makers as a young team figuring it out. AND we are in cowtown, and it’s just not that attractive a destination for young millionaires…face it. If I was 25 and a millionaire I would not be figuring out a way to live in Sacramento. So we need to take guys like Landry and Dalembert, with expiring deals and trade value, and move them for pieces that either make sense for the future or land us playmakers today. Landry/Dalembert for guys like Jrue Holiday, Bayless, DeRozan, Teague, Josh Smith, Marvin Williams, ABSOLUTELY… the list goes on and on. But don’t give us the Troy Murphys and Dunleavy’s of the world please

I like the games of both Landry and Dally so if they are talking about resigning, that’s fine. But if there’s a sense that we can’t make a deal and lock them up, then we need to move them for other players.

Cousins is going to be a good player, perhaps even an All Star, so there’s no sanity in moving him anywhere unless you get a similar big that is young with tremendous upside. But local history suggests that moving a young big that is tough to handle at times sets the franchise back. Just look at what happened to the Warriors when they were forced to trade Webber and got back Gugliotta… Disaster.

Besides, the Kings have a payroll that is less than half that of the Lakers, Magic, Celtics, Mavs, etc. Does anyone think we are going to compete with the lowest payroll in the league? We don’t need MORE cap space, we need management to spend money once they are confident that a few free agent additions will make a difference.

by LDM on Dec 2, 2010 3:57 PM PST reply actions  

I agree with you.

I ‘slightly’ disagree about not being able to sign ANY notables, but you are largely correct IMO.

We are assembling a lot of talent. No need to trade it away for anything beyond a sure thing (or close to it). We just need to develop what we have. My frustration is that I don’t see development occurring.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

I think the block below is important
But provided he is working hard to develop the Kings’ young players and hold the kids accountable, he should be here. Provided those goals (and any goals Petrie has laid out) are met, there’s literally nothing to lose in keeping him on board. The benefit could be whatever a measure of franchise consistency or stability provides.

I’d add “and as long as he hasn’t lost the team” (which it would appear he has not at this point) to that. Petrie and the Maloofs aren’t stupid, nor do they want the team to flounder any more than the rest of us. I’ve found some of PW’s decisions puzzling, but GP and the Maloofs are the ultimate arbiters there. Bottom line, they don’t want the team to suck any more than we do and if they didn’t think PW was getting done they’d get rid of him.

by outrider on Dec 2, 2010 4:05 PM PST reply actions  

Geoff's words are more calming than Paul's or even Jerry's

but in the end, how many people here on this site are going out to buy more tickets the way the team is playing. We’re on pace to win less games than last year, after making 2 major additions to our low post game.

As far a players earning minutes, when your a rebuilding team your youth needs some minutes. And a comfort level that allows them to enjoy whatever minutes they do get without worrying that their next mistake will get them pulled and possibly a DNP-CD in the next game.

I have never said that the coach needs to be fired, but I have been against his rotation policies since the middle of last year. And, I could understand last season because of all the injuries and roster changes. But, there are no excuses this season. Our 6 returning core players, and 3 major additions of Dalembert, Cousins and Head, should not be mysteries after training camp, preseason and a month and a half of regular season. So, whatever minutes they have earned that should be getting consistently.

But, still it continues. Donte scored 6pt and held Granger to 5pts in the 1st quarter of the Indiana game, yet Greene didn’t play the last 18 minutes of the game. PW’s wants consistency, yet he is the biggest culprit when it comes to not being inconsistent.

Petrie makes a good point about the rotation changes improving the defense, because it has. We added Dalembert which was the purpose we added him in the first place. And, we started Donte who leads the team in DNP-CD, and we replaced Beno with Luther who also was added to the team for his defense as well as his outside shot. But, those improvements came from player movement. When are we going to see improvement directly related to coaching?

Petrie also makes the point that the players know the plays but just sometimes forget. But, it seems that even when they do remember them, the plays are perdictable and highly defensable. How good are the plays when the result is DeMarcus getting the ball at the left elbow extended and having him beat his man one on one and drive to the basket. Or the same for Carl, only on the right wing, or Evans at the top of the key? From all accounts at least one of the players has the same concern and maybe others. And, unless JT is suffering from Althimers, how is it that after 15 months of PW’s coaching, he still can’t defend or run a pick and roll with Tyreke.

As for TZ’s final conclusion that things could go wrong-er by changing the coach right now, that might be true. But, if PW doesn’t stop coaching by his gut when it comes to playing time and rotations, and start teaching his young players how to rely on each other to get themselves out of trouble, this team will implode before the end of the season. And that will be even wrong-er-er.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 2, 2010 4:35 PM PST reply actions  

Well said..

And while the rotations bother me as well, I’m not sure the kings offensive style(if you can call it that) meshes with their assets. We are a young team and should focus more on transition offense than half court. Walking the ball up court, letting the clock run down to 10-12 seconds and forcing an iso play is certainly not working.

Ball movement, ball movement, ball movement. Lets wear out these older guys and relish in our youth.

Of course to be a good transition team we need consistency in the rotations so players know what to expect from each other.

These problems PW owns.

When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car.

by nothingbutnet on Dec 2, 2010 5:05 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

You seem to pick on JT a lot HT

Is JT our only big that you feel can’t run pick and roll with Tyreke? Are you saying that Landry is better than JT at defending a pick and roll?

by MichaelMack on Dec 2, 2010 5:05 PM PST up reply actions  

By pick if you mean point out his weaknesses,(as I see them) then maybe I do

But, I’ve said negative things about everyone on the team from time to time. Not to discredit them as much as to bring some of the high expectation closer to reality.

but to answer your question, Landry might be the worst, and Dalembert is the best. Cousins is coming along, and I don’t have a good enough handle on Jackson because I just haven’t seen enough of him to create an opinion.

I usually use how a big shows or Impedes the ball handler coming off the pick, and whether he stays long enough to allow the ball handlers defender to reacquire his man, before the big drops out of the double and either picks up his own man or if he gets help, his helpers man. JT and Carl are very slow to even follow their man out to help on the pick. And, when they do they usually fail to impede the Ball handler or simply bail out and follow thier own man leaving their teammate beaten and trailing the man with the ball.

On setting the pick, you have to get in close enough and come to a stop long enough to allow your teammate to run his man off of you. JT is like a yo-yo, running in at the last moment, then almost immediately bouncing back out. And, that’s why he gets called for so many moving screens. One of the BasketBall websites had an example of Sammy when he was still with the Sixers, running the pick and roll against the Kings, and pointed out how Sammy knew just the right amount of time to set before moving out.

The true point here isn’t that JT isn’t capable of doing what Sammy knows how to do. But, that under the guidance of PW and his coaching staff, that JT hasn’t gotten any better at it then he was in his rookie year. And, the same could be said about the other young players concerning their ability to make their defensive rotations. There I go again picking on the young guys.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 2, 2010 10:43 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Too bad that after Sammy's pick

You have to rely on his roll. The thought of Dalembert making a move to the basket that does not involve a one-step dunk frightens me.

That said, I agree with your premise and do not understand why either JT or TopHat cannot learn how to set a proper pick.

Here’s another question, do we even run the PNR? I would guess not very much (likely due to both playcalling and a lack of PNR talent).

by Mityt on Dec 3, 2010 7:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Well, they start out as Picks but seldom end as Rolls

But, yes we do occasionally. Beno has a bad habit of not waiting for the pick to set, and is usually only looking to get to his spot and put up his Beno Draino. It’s almost always about him scoring and never about getting the ball to the big. Which could be why the bigs run the play so half heartedly.

Evans at least trys occasionally, but doesn’t seem to have a good handle on how to make the pass when the man covering the screener move out on him. And, he seldom cuts hard off the screen so he almost always ends up putting himself in the double team.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 3, 2010 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Your last line

is a point I see often in the game. As much as the big has a responsibility to set a solid screen, the guard has to run his man into the screen, not somewhat close to where his screen is. I think as bonehead as JT is, he does pick up fouls trying to use his hips to close the gaps where our guards are leaving too much room between themselves and where our big men are set, and the guard is cutting at half speed, which makes it easy for the defense to step out and allow the defensive guard to catch up.

When I said “pick on JT”, it seems like he weathers a few more pop remarks from you in regards to these situations than Carl, when he is not worse, and in my eyes, a touch better at the pick and roll. Especially this year, Carl seems out of sorts. He seems slow to very slow on defense, much more so than last year, where I thought he was pretty adequate, and I dont know if that he is carrying extra weight or if it is the weight of this disorganized team slowing him down. I will admit to being a bit more of an JT apologist though because I think rebounding wins games, and as we search for an identity, I wish we would play our biggest team possible, try and dominate the defensive boards, and use that to kick start the break and let Reke, Beno, Casspi, Greene, and Cisco fly, they all can be effective running the floor.

by MichaelMack on Dec 3, 2010 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

He gets a lot of fouls on those

and so is even more tenative setting them – leading to more fouls . . . .

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Dec 3, 2010 9:39 AM PST up reply actions  

Youth Movement and Development

A lot of the Kings problems, inconsistencies, etc. are definitely related to the young ages of the players and future success is dependent on the development of those players. With age they will be better, how much better remains to be seen. Tyreke hasn’t shown much improvement from last year. Defenses are wise to his 4 on 1 offense and easy layups don’t come as easy as before. His jump shot improvement has a long way to go and without a good one defenses will continue to plug up the key. Cousins sometimes appears to be lost on the floor and PW, well, that’s another topic. If it takes another 2-4 years to develop into a play-off contender, will the Kings still be in Sacramento? Are the Maloof’s pockets deep enough and are they willing to watch attendance continue to drop. They need a winner. No matter how big a fan you are no one likes a loser year after year. NBA is a business and they are good business men. Empty seats don’t pay the bills and what bothers me is that by the time the Kings youth grow up they may do so elsewhere.

by Bill2 on Dec 2, 2010 4:51 PM PST reply actions  

Good ol' Maloofs.

Can’t cost cut to buy your budget cake and it be tasty too.

by Slikk_J on Dec 2, 2010 4:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Love your post.

I agree with all of the above

(except for wanting Westphal gone….. ;-)

by Hoops Mike on Dec 2, 2010 4:52 PM PST reply actions  

I miss Salmons.

As said, too bad he had to be the sweetener to get rid of Millers terrible contract, because although he liked to wind the clock down and drive, he was consistently good on both ends of the floor, and was cheap. Glad to see him get a good contract and wish him the best, but thinking about him slotting into SF right now….Offense and Defense look a lot better.

That’s why being a stinge doesn’t help in the long run (err unless all that free cap space goes to greatness touch wood/mashallah).

by Slikk_J on Dec 2, 2010 4:55 PM PST reply actions  

Your are right

along with Head, Reke, Beno, and Landry, we cant have too many offensive players who hold that ball too long and drive.

by MichaelMack on Dec 2, 2010 5:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Salmons is a good player

but the last thing this team needs is another guy dribbling the crap out of the ball

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Dec 3, 2010 9:40 AM PST up reply actions  

I thought that we already decided that the players forgetting the play, cause all the dribbling

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 3, 2010 2:59 PM PST up reply actions  

OT: Miami vs. Cleveland

LeBron’s just dismantling the Cavs tonight. Not quite the revenge the Cleveland fans were looking for.

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~ Rogers Hornsby

by otis29 on Dec 2, 2010 7:02 PM PST reply actions  

I'm just waiting for the "Delonte" chants

"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims

by edm7 on Dec 2, 2010 7:05 PM PST up reply actions  

I was amused at the "Whos your daddy?" chants

"For five decades (and counting), these fans have been blessed with West, Baylor, Wilt, Kareem, Magic, Shaq and Kobe. Seven of the 15 best players ever. At some point, the gravy train will end. The Lakers will bottom out like the Knicks did last decade, submarined by bad moves, poor signings and unlucky drafts. Their fans will flee in droves. Jack will pass away. The buzz will be gone. That's how the NBA works -- in a 30-team league, you can't always get lucky, not even if you're a big-market team with deep pockets. I don't know if that day is three years off or 30, but it's coming." Bill Simmons

by king4life on Dec 2, 2010 7:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow that's kind of messed up in a way isn't it?

Pretty sure Lebron’s dad left before he ever knew him.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 2, 2010 7:39 PM PST up reply actions  

I believe they were referencing the Delonte West rumors of last year

"For five decades (and counting), these fans have been blessed with West, Baylor, Wilt, Kareem, Magic, Shaq and Kobe. Seven of the 15 best players ever. At some point, the gravy train will end. The Lakers will bottom out like the Knicks did last decade, submarined by bad moves, poor signings and unlucky drafts. Their fans will flee in droves. Jack will pass away. The buzz will be gone. That's how the NBA works -- in a 30-team league, you can't always get lucky, not even if you're a big-market team with deep pockets. I don't know if that day is three years off or 30, but it's coming." Bill Simmons

by king4life on Dec 2, 2010 8:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Do you guys know we only have 3 guys playing

at least half a game? Has this ever been done before?
It strikes me as very odd. I really don’t have abything to say , except weird.

There are some guys smarter than me, some guys better looking, I take comfort in the fact that there is no guy that is both.

by ElRonToro on Dec 2, 2010 10:50 PM PST reply actions  

BTW

We are 30th in home attendance but 21st in road….poeple must like train wrecks.

Here

There are some guys smarter than me, some guys better looking, I take comfort in the fact that there is no guy that is both.

by ElRonToro on Dec 2, 2010 11:15 PM PST up reply actions  

or here

http://espn.go.com/nba/attendance/_/sort/awayAvg

There are some guys smarter than me, some guys better looking, I take comfort in the fact that there is no guy that is both.

by ElRonToro on Dec 2, 2010 11:15 PM PST up reply actions  

It probably means the other team is drawing well.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 6:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes, Carl 28.8 mpg, Beno 30 mpg and Evans 36.6 mpg

Also, only 3 players have started in more than 66% of our games. Tyreke 15 starts, Landry 14 starts and Dalembert 11 starts out of 16 games.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 2, 2010 11:16 PM PST up reply actions  

With this system, you'd think we'd have more wins

everybody being so well rested

There are some guys smarter than me, some guys better looking, I take comfort in the fact that there is no guy that is both.

by ElRonToro on Dec 2, 2010 11:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe that's the real problem, no ones playing enough minutes to be in game shape ;)

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 3, 2010 7:20 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

It is inexcuseable.

Seriously.

Identifying a rotation is probably the most basic function a coach can perform. There is no reasonable excuse after this much time.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 3, 2010 10:41 AM PST up reply actions  

You think it's inexcusable that we do not have a settled PG and SF?

I get the frustration with the DNPs but I can definitely understand having different people start at those positions (except for Thompson at SF I suppose)

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 10:43 AM PST up reply actions  

As Section so aptly points out there's very little talent difference at those positions

so what difference is it going to make who plays? Just pick one and stay with him until he gets comfortable playing with the other regulars.

We only have 11 players getting minutes. How difficult can it be to pick a 9 man rotation and stick with it. PW seems to think that every game he has Battier dressed in a Kings uni, and he keeps calling out numbers until he finds him.

In the Indiana game, PW pointed out that he tried everyone on Granger to shut him down. Well, did he ever think, that the answer wasn’t in any one person, but in something. Like a different defensive scheme. In a team sport the answer isn’t always about ther personel, but how the personel play together. If you want consistency maybe we should start with consistent lineups.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 3, 2010 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh my goodness

Thank you for posting this. We keep deriding PW for thinking that if he subs the right player, the course of the game is going to change, and then so many clamor for a trade for a player that will change the King’s fortune. We finally added a superior shot blocker in Dally, still defensive troubles. Good defensive teams play good team defense! I think both our defense and our offense would improve with just consistency and familiarity, and without lookig over their shoulder wondering if a bad game means a DNP.

by MichaelMack on Dec 3, 2010 5:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Hassan Whiteside

Hassan Whiteside blocked four shots in just 13 minutes of play in Reno. Just sayin’

by swooshrc on Dec 3, 2010 9:03 AM PST reply actions  

Hassan Whiteside

Hassan Whiteside had 5 fouls in just 13 minutes of play in Reno. Just sayin’ (he isn’t ready yet)

by Skinny Pete on Dec 3, 2010 11:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Minutes for Omri and DMC

I would really like to see Cousins and Omri play more. He has been really inconsistent, of course. And he has been in foul trouble in nearly every game; but he has only fouled out of three games. He’s only played more than 30 minutes in one game and it was 30:26 or something. Now, having said that, there are certainly instances, like the Bulls game, where he does nothing less than take himself out of the game by making repeated silly decisions. But that should mean taking him out, sitting him down, settling him, and instructing him before his return.

Same with Omri. Omri is has played really sparse minutes in the last 7. It may have been because he was missing assignments – offensively or defensively; I dunno. But the reprocussions have been huge in terms of floor time.

I really want to see some player development; and if not that, at least I want to see the players put in a position to develop; and if not that then I would like to know why they aren’t seeing floor time. At the least, I’d hope that the players know why they aren’t seeing floor time…

There have been very few bright spots for this team; but any semblance of player development would be great to see.

Go Kings!

by DustyG on Dec 3, 2010 9:16 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

DMC

does seem like he is in horrible shape, tho.

by DustyG on Dec 3, 2010 9:17 AM PST up reply actions  

He needs to read the Roy Hibbert book on getting into shape

When Hibbert was in Georgetown, he looked sluggish and unathletic.

He now looks slim and in great shape – a potential MIP for this year. If DMC can follow in Hibbert’s footsteps, DMC would be a beast!

by KingsJunkie on Dec 3, 2010 9:32 AM PST up reply actions  

Hibberts improvements

Are said to be as a result of working with Bill walton this off-season. Maybe the Maloofs could just by-pass Waltons remaining game spots for us, and just have him work with OUR bigs.

by 9K1NGS6 on Dec 3, 2010 10:22 AM PST up reply actions  

DMC is usually playing as many minutes

as his fouls allow.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Dec 3, 2010 9:42 AM PST up reply actions  

As I mentioned

He’s only fouled out of 3 games out of 16. I wouldn’t say that qualifies as ‘usually’. And, ya, I realize he ends up with 5 fouls many other times; but 5 fouls do not a player disqualify! Let him play!

by DustyG on Dec 3, 2010 10:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Should probably point out

I know at least up to last week he was rocking a Danny Fortson per36 foul rate.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 10:08 AM PST up reply actions  

So...

should we let him play more? or is a Danny Fortson foul rate mean that he should not be allowed to pick up his sixth?

What’s your point?

by DustyG on Dec 3, 2010 11:08 AM PST up reply actions  

I essentially meant what lttg said

I know he usually has been getting 5 fouls but if you play him more minutes I assure you he will get the 6th very quick

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 11:14 AM PST up reply actions  

Uh huh...

My point remains:

It is very likely that if he plays some time after his fifth foul he will pick up his sixth. But I’m sure that he won’t get playing time after his fifth if you don’t put him in the ballgame.

by DustyG on Dec 3, 2010 11:40 AM PST up reply actions  

yeah

but don’t be shocked if his minutes only increases by a few because he will get that 6th foul pretty quick on average is all

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 3, 2010 11:49 AM PST up reply actions  

ok

that’s all i would really like to see really – an increase of a few minutes per game.

by DustyG on Dec 5, 2010 10:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I think you 2 are mssing the big picture

If PW believes he needs him for crunch time (say last 4 minutes) he will do his best to monitor his fouls. If he gets thru those 4 minutes without a foul then , yes, PW could have given him more minutes.
An extension of your logic would be that we don’t take players out for anything but fatigue or tactical subs; if those 2 situations don’t exist we attempt to play from start to finish , until they pick up 6.

There are some guys smarter than me, some guys better looking, I take comfort in the fact that there is no guy that is both.

by ElRonToro on Dec 3, 2010 5:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Still is rocking Forston's foul rate Wally.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 3, 2010 11:51 AM PST up reply actions  

As long as he doesn't rock Fortson's pigtails

I’m good.

There are some guys smarter than me, some guys better looking, I take comfort in the fact that there is no guy that is both.

by ElRonToro on Dec 3, 2010 5:05 PM PST up reply actions  

It is very likely that if he plays some time after his fifth foul he will pick up his sixth. But I’m sure that he won’t get playing time after his fifth if you don’t put him in the ballgame.

by DustyG on Dec 3, 2010 11:10 AM PST up reply actions  

So do you put him in just for the sake of getting time untill his sixth foul?

Or do you give hime crunch time minutes ? Your arguement only makes sense if he gets number five within the last three minutes of the game or so. If you want to put him in key situations at the games end (where he seams to respond) and he gets number five with ten minutes in the fourth, you have to sit him at least till the five minute mark so he can get the key minutes that will teach the most at the end of the game.

by 9K1NGS6 on Dec 3, 2010 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Crunch time minutes!!

Haha. When’s the last time we had some crunchtime minutes?! The first 3 minutes of the game are the crunchiest times for this squad!

by DustyG on Dec 4, 2010 6:19 PM PST up reply actions  

The four games between

11/14 and 11/21 were probably the last games where nearly every possession mattered down the stretch (losses to the Pistons, Knicks and Hornets, with a win against the Nets). Seems like a long time ago.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Dec 4, 2010 6:45 PM PST up reply actions  

One of the things to remember is the records of the following teams that picked ahead of us

Wizards: 5-12
Sixers: 5-13
Nets: 6-13
T-Wolves: 4-14

A top five pick, even when accompanied by another top 5 pick from the year before, does not turn a team around. Even the Clips who have probably this year’s ROY, who was a number 1 pick last year are 4-15.

We are not where I’d like us to be. But I don’t think we’re as far off where we should be as most people think. This is why a lot of us “good old boys” were warning people not to start thinking we are a playoff team. It is a long slow process.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 3, 2010 12:02 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Well
warning people not to start thinking we are a playoff team

This team’s play is off, I’d say. Does that count?

Dunking Dutchman

by RikSmits on Dec 4, 2010 12:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
A Learning Experience on Loyalty For Sacramento Via Golden State
Lionel_small
#HereWeStay
Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration (UofL days)
Kings_sports_illustrated_small
Funny story
Small
As I sit here and watch the OKC Thunder come back against the Lakers
Waymantisdale-tz-150_small
the owners called down the thunder
Chief_petty_officer_small
Maturity in Sacramento Debacle
Small
Ryan Anderson to the Kings - Petrie's Gotta Give It A Thought
Chief_petty_officer_small
Open letter to the Maloofs
Small
Middle Ground on the Roster Situation

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G