Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

In Defense of PW



Now, before I get labeled as an apologist for Paul Westphal, I would like to say that I am not sure he is the right fit for the team long term. That remains to be seen (and I believe that should depend more on player development than wins and losses).

That being said, watching how this season has unfolded and how he has been blamed for pretty much everything under the sun, I think we should also recognize that he has not been dealt a very good hand.


The reason is this team is a vastly different from the one we ended with last year. Not only in terms of personnel, but also in terms of style of play and offensive philosophy.

Star-divide

The biggest change between this year and last has been the of the play of Tyreke, which is the one thing clearly that hasn't been Paul's fault. Tyreke hasn't been able to replicate the success of his rookie year.  In fact, I would argue that he is responsible for most of our troubles this year. Whether he isn't getting it done because of his bum foot or because the league has caught up with him (i.e., has learned how to take away his ability to drive by packing the paint) remains to be seen, but what is clear is that we can't build our offense solely around him.

When we ended the season last year, Tyreke was the focal point of our offense, and the offense worked with moderate success. This year that offensive philosophy has failed miserably and PW has had to change on the fly. Furthermore, I believe Tyreke's tendency to dominate the ball has probably caused some problems in the locker room, which only makes things more difficult for PW. If we were winning, it wouldn't be an issue, but we aren't, so players have got to be unhappy when one player dominates the ball.

As a result, PW has had to change the offensive philosophy without pissing off arguably our best player in Tyreke. This can't be easy. In the last few games, I have seen the Kings push the ball more to get fast break opportunities with success. Also, I have seen Demarcus get the ball deep in the paint more in the half court with success. I like the thinking and I am excited to see how it develops, but it is not something that is going to happen overnight.

Simply put, I think PW is trying some things that have started to pay dividends and he is trying to do so without alienating Tyreke, which he seems to have managed so far.

Again, it seems like a very delicate situation from where I am sitting.

(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)

Comment 75 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

can't say i agree at all

the offense was bad last year too. the kings stood around and watched tyreke go 1:1 last year – especially down the stretch as he pushed for his 20-5-5. this is not a new problem – it was something they should have been aware of going into the offseason and done something about then – not on the fly at the beginning of this year as you success.

PW has created much of his own issues in my opinion. constant shifting of the lineup to start the year made it virtually impossible for any of the players so get a rhythm. they all struggled and didn’t start breaking the 100 pt barrier until recently he stopped the musical chairs act.

as for dalembert in the post…. really???? success – making a shot does seem like success when you miss 16 in a row but please – the guy is not a good offensive player and should be the 5th option whenever he is on the floor.

as for Tyreke – his struggles are well-documented and it definitely impacts the team. however, i’d argue it’s PW’s insistence on having Tyreke run PG and initiate the offense much of the time that compounds the issue. If you have a 2 that is struggling it mainly impacts him but not the rest of the team because they will still get their touches. If you have a scoring 1 that is playing poorly – not only is he not hitting his shots but he is not getting other guys their shots as well.

by Madzillagd on Dec 9, 2010 11:18 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Solid points Madz

I hope you guys aren't trying to have me get a virus, thats f'd up - MarcusC

by slamson on Dec 9, 2010 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Pretty sure...

That he said Demarcus in the post, not Dalembert.

I cannot agree with those who rank modesty among the virtues. To the logician all things should be seen exactly as they are, and to underestimate one’s self is as much a departure from truth as to exaggerate one’s own powers.
--Holmes, on Modesty

by Donovan Jeska on Dec 10, 2010 1:19 PM PST up reply actions  

So, defense of PW by shifting the blame to Tyreke?

No, I don’t think so and, if that wasn’t clear as mud, I disagree. PW has brought thi upon himself. Madz addresses a lot of the points, but did not address some important issues. Like playing Landry in the high post distributing the ball and having JT play 3.

PW does not seem to understand how to get the most out of and use these players the best. He has seemed more bent on pushing players into a mold they can’t play rather than using them and their talents best. Luther Head should not play PG, SG yeah, but he isn’t good at setting up plays.

They still do this at times and you will see weird assignments on the floor. You will see Pooh on the floor basically playing SG or SF rather than PG and you will still see Landry in the high post. It is just less often rather than all the time.

PW has been his own worst enemy, IMO. Tyreke Evans has been playing hurt. That is all there is to it and other players need to step up. Beno and JT did last night. Omri did the game before that. It is up the coach to start putting other players in the position to score and he wasn’t doing that. He wasn’t playing them to their best abilities and setting them up to succeed.

I get that this is a young and rebuilding team, but PW has clearly screwed it up repeatedly. He seems to be turning it around, I hope.

I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...

by MustangMBS on Dec 9, 2010 2:08 PM PST reply actions  

PW is a veteran "players coach"

He’s a veteran at coaching veteran players. Players who have established their own game and play within themselves.

And, by that I mean that he let’s the players play their game within the confines of the offense. Less structure and more freedom. And, that’s why we’re seeing Carl and Cuz getting the ball 15 ft from the basket instead of in the paint. And, Tyreke still playing his game.

On the positive side, I can remember posting in the past that the past coaches needed to play the rookies more. But, that’s never been a complaint against PW. In fact, he seems to be letting Cuz and Tyreke do their thing and find their own way. Some times to the detriment of the team which may be why he feels he needs to continually change the lineup in order to find ways to conteract the problems that they’re causing.

I think it’s debatable as to whether or not that’s the best way to develop a player like Cuz or Reke. But, at least their getting their minutes. And, overall if we were to be on pace for a 30-33 win season, we would need 7 or 8 wins in our first 20 games. And, looking back at the schedule, I think the only games we should have won that we didn’t were the home games against Minny and Detroit. INDY & NYK are much better than I thought coming into the season, and losing to the Clips on the road while disappointing, wasn’t to be totally unexpected.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 9, 2010 2:24 PM PST reply actions  

When I read something like this...

..it feels like you’re living in my brain SB. No offense.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 9, 2010 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

A high compliment indeed.

And I mean that.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 9, 2010 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

We've been seeing eye to eye in many of the important realms lately.

Maybe it’s just me, but I’ve noticed that this site has become a stomping ground for the “don’t fire PW; there are bigger problems and the coach being fired won’t solve ’em” and the "fire PW crowd because he’s harming the “development” of younger players".

It’s like noting how the US has become either red or blue in political stature. It’s kinda strange.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 9, 2010 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

As for the "fire PW crowd"

I will say I really appreciate the work HighTops has done articulating his thoughts and opinions on Westphal.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 9, 2010 6:50 PM PST up reply actions  

there are some similarities

because much like US politics, it seems to me the ’don’t blame PW’ crowd spends most of their time trying to bash the ‘anti-PW’ arguments rather than present anything positive about PW at all. it’s all about negative attack ads.

i think the anti-PW crowd has presented a pretty good case: crazy rotations, DNP to Starter scenarios, horrendous offense, questionable development

So far what i’ve read from the Pro-PW (okay not Pro but the anti-anti-PW crowd is): tyreke is hurt, ??, ??

Can someone please present some Pro-PW arguments that aren’t just contradictions to the anti-PW arguments

by Madzillagd on Dec 10, 2010 9:59 AM PST up reply actions  

Dude

If you haven’t manged to find the keep PW arguments by now, you never will. Obviously you are seeing what you want to see. And using your logic, all of your fire PW arguments are just contradictions to the keep PW arguments.

But thank you for playing.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 10, 2010 10:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Yup.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2010 10:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Agree with you on this Madzillagd

There’s plenty of reason to question PW’s ability to handle this squad, just as there are questions about which of these players is a long-term fit on the roster.

However, I think the main argument of the pro-PW crowd is pretty simple – he hasn’t had enough time with this current roster to really put his mark on it. And I think that’s also a fair argument.

My response would be that he didn’t experience a full-roster shakeout from last season. He’s inherited predominantly the same team, plus a few new pieces in Dalembert and Cousins. The fact that he’s decided to use some journeyman players in his rotation (Head, Jackson, Jeter) that were really end of the bench guys was his decision and is open for question. He gets no sympathy in my book for shaking up his rotation to play guys who might not have a job in the league if they weren’t in Sacramento. It’s fair to question if those decisions are hurting the development of the young players. It certainly hasn’t resulted in an increase in wins – well, one win is an increase I suppose.

So the big question is – is this team making tangible improvement? For most of the season, that would be a resounding “no”. The last few games have rekindled my optimism though. We’ll see whether that’s sustainable over time against better teams.

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~ Rogers Hornsby

by otis29 on Dec 10, 2010 10:31 AM PST up reply actions  

LMAO

This response is glorious.

So far what i’ve read from the Pro-PW (okay not Pro but the anti-anti-PW crowd is): tyreke is hurt, ??, ??
 
Can someone please present some Pro-PW arguments that aren’t just contradictions to the anti-PW arguments

I was unaware that the Anti-PW element were in fact arguing that Tyreke has been healthy thus turning this into a mere contradiction. Interesting. Actually the whole thing about Tyreke’s health is in fact an arguement about the hand PW has been dealt which is in fact an arguement on it’s own, not a contradiction.

The anti-PW crowd has provided good insight in regards to the “DNP to Starter scenarios” and “horrendous offense” (personally think HT in particular has had the most interesting comments in regards to the offense). All I am saying is the pro-PW group have actually also made arguements as to why they believe PW does not deserve to be fired that are not just mere contractions to the anti-PW arguement (like “Hey this team’s talent is the main issue”) but this is just a comically hilarious attempt to try alter the burden of proof. Apparanlty in order to say PW shouldn’t be fired you can no longer point out to why you think he hasn’t been given a fair deal. Nope, it is a mere contradiction! Apparantly contradiction is the new definition of an opinion that differs from yours.

Well done on the spin. Well done.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 10, 2010 10:38 AM PST up reply actions  

To be fair wallywagon

There is a pro-PW element here who create arguments that the anti-PW or the not-sure-on-PW contingent don’t really make. Stuff like “geez, you guys bitch about him not having a set lineup, then bitch at him for not being more flexible”. I think arguments from different people (who may have different reasons for disliking Westphal’s work) are occasionally put together to discredit anti-PW arguments as a whole. But I guess that’s life on a very active sports message board.

I’m really on the fence with Westphal right now, but I see both sides having some arguments that have merit. And I don’t think any decision should be made on his future until the end of the season.

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~ Rogers Hornsby

by otis29 on Dec 10, 2010 11:26 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree, stuff like "geez, you guys bitch about him not having a set lineup, then bitch at him for not being more flexible" aren't arguements

like, for instance, the observation that very few people who are supportive of PW have offered positive statements abourt the coach as part of their arguement. Both are fine observations but (a) don’t engage in such obversvations when you are simultaneously complaining about others making them and (b) it’s mildly entertaining to watch someone paint an opposing group of people with a giant brush and mischaracterize all their arguements as “contradictions” and bring up images of “negative attack ads” and then use an example that … was an arguement and nowhere near a “contradiction.” Hey I am just saying that is pretty impressive.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 10, 2010 11:49 AM PST up reply actions  

supreme fail

“like, for insance, the observation that vew people who are supportive of PW have offered positive statments about the coach is not an arguement either.”

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 10, 2010 12:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Fair points

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~ Rogers Hornsby

by otis29 on Dec 10, 2010 12:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Rec'd. Nailed it from baseline to baseline.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2010 11:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Good points

I would disagree that it is all Pro or Anti- PW. That most on this forum are either one way or the other. We may lean one way, but aren’t committed to it fully. I was leaning toward the fire him side, but it isn’t so simple.

I think a lot of people feel there is a balanced perspective to take. That it really isn’t just about keeping or firing him at this point, but continuing to evaluate him. To do that you have to be objective about the issues. I think, to be fair, there are valid counterpoints to a lot of what you state above which are equally compelling. I just think it is important to have your list of pros and cons, but still keep an open mind.

I think too many people have made up there minds already and that is too bad. There has been some good points and counterpoints. For example, I really enjoyed the dialog with Section. He made some good points about lack of talent, but then there is the other side of questioning of how PW uses the talent he has and if that is effective or not. My point was that a lot of times it is not and we can’t even successfully evaluate the talent if it isn’t used right.

There is a back and forth that has been meaningful, but all too often it involves discrediting each other that really isn’t productive or helpful. There are valid points on both sides and if you are too far either way you are probably just wrong.

I think it is best to keep an open mind and see what develops. There is no clear cut right or wrong and we need to see what happens. Sure, we lost a lot of games and clearly PW screwed the pooch on a number of things, but he seems to be doing the right stuff now.

Let’s see what happens now that we have a more stable rotation and what seems to be a better use of talent.

I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...

by MustangMBS on Dec 10, 2010 11:48 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree

In fact I think you would find that even the Pro PW people are really just anti-firing him right now. I might very well be arguing to replace him at the end of the season. But I want enough to time and enough games to make an informed decision.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 10, 2010 11:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Not going to lie

But I like his x’s and o’s. I like that he preaches a ball moving offense and a rotation defense.

I struggle mightily trying to give an educated opinion on this type of stuff and it’s mildly embarrassing given I have watched basketball for so long. But it’s true.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 10, 2010 11:51 AM PST up reply actions  

And it's very hard

To know when the team is following his instructions and when they aren’t. Was that a called Iso play, or Tyreke just dribbling the ball? Did the coach really want Dally holding the ball at the top of the key while everyone else watched him. I have to base much of my decisions on what he says in interviews and how the media break things down. But from what I’ve heard, he’s preaching what I generally believe in.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 10, 2010 11:54 AM PST up reply actions  

That's my problem with PW.

How do I know the difference between the team running his plays correctly or incorrectly? It’s so difficult to tell.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2010 12:00 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I think that if we don't see

clear improvement by the end of the year, we can determine that either his plays stink or he can’t teach them. After two full seasons, either the plan works or it’s time to look for a new plan.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 10, 2010 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Seems reasonable.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2010 12:26 PM PST up reply actions  

rec'd for

responded to the challenge.

by Madzillagd on Dec 10, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Back at you!

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 10, 2010 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Wow SB that was impressive

I’ve been just as frustrated with PW as anyone here(even though I don’t want hime fired) but that was a great argument. I still think he should have known what he had (& stuck with it) after training camp & preseason but I am not as irrate as I once was. Good job.

I love beating dead horses.

by allbenji's on Dec 10, 2010 8:32 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm sorry, I'm not buying it.

Westphal is not the only one to blame, the players need to do their jobs too. However there are things that have happened with this team that are under Westphal’s control that just has me scratching my head.

The most glaring of which is not just the constant changes in the starting line up and rotations, but how dramatic they are. How does Jason Thompson go from DNP to starter? How about Donte and Omri switching from starters to DNP’s? Earlier it was Luther Head and now it’s Pooh Jeter. Maybe it would be more understandable if a player goes from starter to sixth man but Westphal goes in such extremes in terms of playing time for players it staggering. No other team in the league does this, not even close.

Also what happened in the off-season was a head scratcher too. Was there no communication between the coach and his players at all? Why did Donte bulk up all summer with no knowledge of the staff? And speaking of off-season, how does Westphal not find his starting line up during the off-season like everyone else? If (and that’s a big if) he’s set on this starting line up why did it take 20 games into the regular season?

I did think the players gave up on him with the dismal play against the Lakers and Clippers (to mention a few). But the players seem to be playing better the last few games so we’ll see.

A win is good, but it was against a Wizards team missing their best player. If the Kings can string together a decent run then maybe I will eat my words. And in decent run, I don’t mean wins necessarily, just quality play from the team. I somehow doubt this is the last line up change we will see and I just don’t see Westphal as the coach at the end of the season. I would love to be wrong and see this team turn it around.

by nerdninja on Dec 9, 2010 2:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Also what happened in the off-season was a head scratcher too. Was there no communication between the coach and his players at all? Why did Donte bulk up all summer with no knowledge of the staff? And speaking of off-season, how does Westphal not find his starting line up during the off-season like everyone else? If (and that’s a big if) he’s set on this starting line up why did it take 20 games into the regular season?

Not sure what Westphal is supposed to do for Donte there and I have a hard time believing much of the “he said, she said” comments about it. As for the starting lineup, I know it’s been a real long time since preseason but you might remember that there were a ton of injuries and a lot of guys weren’t playing much during the preseason.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 9, 2010 3:43 PM PST up reply actions  

PW has settled on a lineup as of late.

That’s all you can really do.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 9, 2010 3:52 PM PST up reply actions  

In PW's situation I mean.

It’s not as simple as creating a lineup and then sticking with it.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 9, 2010 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly

If PW had played one line-up all year and we were losing this badly, everyone would be calling for his head because he wasn’t adaptable. The sad truth is that with a few exceptions, we not only don’t know who is the best starter, but if we have an actual starter on the team at that position at all.

It’s not like PW came to a team with a set rotation and began screwing with it. He’s been looking for the right pieces to fit together, while dealing with some very young and inconsistent players. If JT played all the time like he did last night, he would be a consistent starter. If Landry played like he did in Houston (or even parts of last year) he’s be the starter.

The thing I like is that guys like Pooh are getting a chance. Everyone on the team knows that if they are not playing, it not because they weren’t given a chance. I actually see the starting line-up beginning to settle down and I’m pretty happy with it at this point.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 9, 2010 4:10 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Yup yup. Rec'd.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 9, 2010 4:23 PM PST up reply actions  

If PW had played one line-up all year and we were losing this badly, everyone would be calling for his head because he wasn’t adaptable. The sad truth is that with a few exceptions, we not only don’t know who is the best starter, but if we have an actual starter on the team at that position at all.

Is it just me or is it kind of odd that there are a lot of people who have complained about the constant line-up changes and at the same time complaints about how we should pull Tyreke?

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 9, 2010 6:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I hope you're right....

But I fear you are wrong. I have no reason to believe that the line up will settle down. And I am not opposed to coaches making tweaks in their rotation and line up, it’s just the extremes that Westphal goes with it.

And to play JT at small forward, then bench him, then DNP him, then start him back at the 4 is a very weird way to develop a guy. This constant juglgle on the team makes Westphal look like he doesn’t know what he’s doing. With young guys leave them in a spot and know that their play will be inconsistent, but if you’re consistant in the way you use a player they usually start figuring it out.

But as a coach it’s his job to know which players will be best utulized in what positions and to develop a system that will put players in a position to suceed. To this point I am not convinced he’s done this.

by nerdninja on Dec 9, 2010 11:52 PM PST up reply actions  

I believe in PW!

He did great things with our team last year…I think the only difference now is that teams know how to defend Reke now, Force him left and give him a step or two let him fade away 3s! Also Casspi wont be comming out of no were anymore, plus beno isn’t playing like we want him too.

Also think about it, Reke is no longer a Rookie, it is HIS team and he knows it….JT and Greene hasn’t worked as hard as they could, Carl laundry has really been our only bright spot..when he’s rebounding. And let s not talk about how inconsistant Garcia and Pooh are…

yeah PW needs to make some better decsions, IDK why ppl are still bitching about how JT played the 3…that one time, and how he never has a set rotaion. Well he sat Greene for a few games…and he exploted for a few games…and now he’s back down…Think what that does to a coach.

We have 1 player who can start for a playoff team…everyone else is coming off the bench fight now (well 2 if u count Top hat, but that’s only on the 6-8 seeds).

I know some times i scratch my head at PW, but last year we all loved him! I think this team just needs to grow up and learn how to play the game of basketball day-in and day-out

by shadowchicken on Dec 9, 2010 8:01 PM PST reply actions  

Don't know where your getting your facts, the players and a lot of posters complained about PW's rotations last season

As far as I’m concerned the only thing that PW did last season was give Tyreke all the playing time he could want. Other than that, the team defense and especially the pick & roll defense was horrible as was the rotations when we doubled. In fact things were so screwed up that one time Beno and Noc both left their man to double at the same time. and, left 2 shooters open and no one else moved. And, team defense is still a problem this season, to the point that PW started Luther over Beno. And, how did that work out?

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 10, 2010 12:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Actually defensively it worked quite well

Offensively it was another story. But I must be missing your point. Are you saying that you think Beno is a good defender? At the time, defense was our biggest problem and the changes PW made had a huge impact on defense.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 10, 2010 7:25 AM PST up reply actions  

JT hasn't worked hard? Landry has been our only bright spot when he is rebounding?

W T F . . . . .

I mean some of your points are close to the mark. But when has Landry really ever rebounded well? When has JT not worked hard. And we did not all love PW last year. His wacked out rotations, pulling players willy nilly, and the whole Spencer fiasco were not all hands down appreciated.

AND yeah ppl are still talking about JT at 3 because it highlights a particular point. That PW has a consistent pattern of putting players in roles they are not suited to play. That is my point and that isn’t the only instance or support for it.

I am not saying PW is unredeemable. I am not even saying fire him now. I am saying that he has screwed up and I recognize that fact. I am not going to let my fanhood blind myself to reality. PW is a question mark. He has the opportunity to change that and I hope he does that.

I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...

by MustangMBS on Dec 9, 2010 8:13 PM PST reply actions  

Reply fail = response to shadowchicken

I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...

by MustangMBS on Dec 9, 2010 8:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Sit Tyreke.

Let him heal up. As that Bulls fan from a week ago said, Rose went through this type of injury that also resulted in a slump in his gameplay. The Bulls sat him, then he got back to playing better than ever.

"Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"

by Schneezel on Dec 9, 2010 10:14 PM PST reply actions  

Fire Tyreke! Replace him with Elie!

Seriously though… one day it feels like all players have no idea what to do on court and that can only be blamed to Westphal’s bad job, another day it looks like that we just don’t have quality, we’re a bad team and that’s all, not Westphal’s fault. Maybe the truth is somewhere in the middle. The bright side is that they are all young so there’s only upside. That’s very very important.

Look at the Clippers. Baron Davis is better than Beno in every way. Gordon plays way better than Tyreke. Griffin is much better than any of our PFs. Kaman (although injured) is still better than DMC and we’re probably a bit better at SF. They have more quality, yet they have a worse record. And yes.. they have a new coach this year.

by ZenBaller on Dec 10, 2010 6:27 AM PST reply actions  

The Clippers haven't had Kaman or Davis for long stretches though.

Both have had significant injuries.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2010 10:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes

still they were 1-7 with Kaman and 0-3 with Baron in the beginning of the season. They have some kind of lack-of-teamwork-curse for decades.

by ZenBaller on Dec 10, 2010 11:22 AM PST up reply actions  

1) Westphal is very experienced.

Which translates to what? You would think experience would lead to stability but that hasn’t been the case with these players. The constant shifting of lineups, the inconsistent handling of players – how has experience helped? Musselman also had NBA experience.

2) Coaching philosophy.

I’m not expecting a winning record from this club so that isn’t an issue. How many coaches in the NBA don’t preach ball movement or defensive rotation? 25th in the league in scoring, 25th in the league in assists, 18th in Opps pts per game – he apparently isn’t being heard by the team because it isn’t working. every coach has a philosphy.

if you want ball movement – why would you ever have tyreke initiate the offense? if you want to pick up the pace – why do you let tyreke take 10 seconds to get up the floor and not start the offense until there’s 14 seconds on the shot clock – that’s not a whole lot of time to get good ball and player movement. if you want ball movement – why would you ever throw the ball into Dalembert in the post???

3) I listen to the people who spend time with him. And what these people keep repeating is that if the players were playing as well as Westphal was coaching, this team wouldn’t be losing like they are. Jerry Reynolds is adamant that PW is doing a good job. Yes, he is paid by the Kings, but that hasn’t stopped him from saying what he believed in the past. Bill Walton repeated the exact same thing.

4) He rewards hard play.

Agree to an extent. Donte lost his job after 1 game – not enough time in my opinion to lose a starting spot. I didn’t see he sit Reke all of a sudden after he tanked a game a couple weeks ago. I want a guy to have to perform to earn their minutes but the issue is you have to be consistent. Landy has received far more PT than his play has warranted.
  
5) The players did NOT give up on him.

Tough to make that call. I don’t think the players are nearly as supportive of him as you think. Following guys on twitter – when Donte was racking up DNPs he was constantly was retweeting comments from folks that were critical of his lack of playing time etc. Why speak out about you getting screwed when you can have somebody else do it and you just retweet it.

6) Continuity.

I’m not expecting playoffs, i’m expecting improvement. since the first two months of the season of last year we have not shown improvement – we’ve gotten worse. the kings won 8 games in November last year – they won 9 games total in Feb, Mar, April. kings record in 2010 (calendar year) = 16-55. 27% winning percentage. how long do you stick with that level of success before you make a change?

7) Future coaches.

Agree – I think PW is a stepping stone. He isn’t the answer and I think the Kings know that. I was expecting him to maybe get the team back to .500 in 3-4 years and then sent on his way for a higher-priced option. Now, however, I don’t think he has what it takes to get us to the .500 level. The problem I see it is you are going to lose players the longer you have a dead duck coach. If you want to keep your existing talent and attract new talent you need to spend the $$ to bring in a top coach. I don’t want a coaching change for another bargain basement – time for the Maloofs to spend the $$.

8) Lastly, like it or not.

Your points here are quiet humerous because you are basically talking about the beginning of last year. PW was shifting the lineup all around and the kings were playing close to .500 ball. Guess what – it drove me nuts and seemed just as idiotic back then.

yes several players were in high school a few years ago but if you look at Westphal’s run at Pepperdine – he hasn’t done so well with this age-group.

by Madzillagd on Dec 10, 2010 1:45 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd for solid responses

Actually I don’t think we disagree near as much as we might think. It mostly a matter of timing and interpretation. I have issues with a lot of the same things you do. I’m just willing to wait longer and give him the benefit of the doubt. Over the next twenty games either I am going to be pulled more to your interpretation or you will be pulled toward mine.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 10, 2010 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think it's the issue's that's the real divide.

It’s the solution. I don’t think the solution is as clear cut as maybe some are thinking it is.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2010 2:03 PM PST up reply actions  

I think you're right

You can’t just say “fire Westphal” without having an idea of what direction to go next. Well, you can, but it doesn’t really make sense.

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~ Rogers Hornsby

by otis29 on Dec 10, 2010 2:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I remember the outcry when Petrie said he thought the biggest issue the Kings were having was on offense.

Yet, what PW did was insert Head into the starting lineup to get more defense. Now he’s inserted Pooh Jeter for more offense.

I think the reality here is that PW has so many opinions that without any immediate and quick fix, he’s sorta stuck. Most coaches switch their lineups and try to find things that work. It’s not just Paul Westphal who does that. Would you fire Nate McMillan for taking out Nicolas Batum and inserting Wes Matthews in the starting lineup?

I think people need to chill out and recognize that players are growing under his tutelage. DeMarcus Cousins is far & away better defensively than I thought he would be this season. That is progress yes? I think getting Donte Greene to admit that he didn’t listen to the coaching staff was a measure of progress. When players realize that the coaching staff is there to assist them in victory, and that includes taking them out of games, it helps a lot.

Okay so the Kings haven’t won as many games as they did at this point last year. But who gives a shit really? All you’re proving is that you only gauge progress is based on your expectations of how victories and losses are going in line to how you saw the team before the season.

The fact is that this team isn’t as good out of the gate as fans wanted. Many are disappointed because of that, and since many fans love the young players, it has to be Paul Westphal’s fault. I didn’t expect this kind of start, but to say I’m really surprised? I have to say that I’m not really surprised even though I think the team has underachieved. Part of that is due to injury, youth and frustration that it hasn’t come together seamlessly.

What I know is that the Kings have a future if DMC continues to improve and get better (how much talk has there been since DMC has put up quality numbers in every game since getting thrown out of practice?), and if Casspi/Greene do the same. If Tyreke’s offense returns to the same level it was last season, I don’t think as many people will focus on his lack of passing.

I think what Kings fans really need is a peace pipe and the biggest chill pill in the history of the world. What do I know? I’m just a Paul Westphal apologist.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2010 2:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm pretty surprised by the level of suck we have seen

but, having said that, I like the players we have this year (and their contracts) more than the group we had a year ago today.

I predict JT will never breathe through his nose.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 10, 2010 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd still like for you to define what failure would mean to you.

What would it take for you to to be cool with Westphal’s removal?

by Hoops Mike on Dec 10, 2010 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

A full season of suckage.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 11, 2010 9:18 AM PST up reply actions  

If Westphal coached Portland.....

He would have taken Batum out and started Armon Johnson. At least Matthews was a high priced free agent who was averaging big numbers off the bench. Westphal likes to start guys who were getting DNP’s a week before their accention. Maybe he thinks it makes them hungrier or maybe he thinks with all that rest they will have more energy.

by nerdninja on Dec 11, 2010 9:16 AM PST up reply actions  

That's a huge assumption.

Westphal starts players who earn it in practice, which you, I’m guessing, do not attend, and tries to see if they can earn it on the court during a game as well.

Tell me, other than Tyreke, who are the clear-cut starters on this roster? Who has shown he belongs in the starting lineup night in and night out?

Batum is a starter on most teams in the league. Who on our roster can you say the same thing about?

StR Token Female

by LeaguePassAddict on Dec 11, 2010 9:46 AM PST up reply actions  

Batum is a starter on most teams in the league. Who on our roster can you say the same thing about?

Omri Casspi, Donte Greene and DeMarcus Cousins. Sometimes.

I would say Beno Udrih is the other clear cut starter, and like Ailene Voisin (I know I’m agreeing with her and that’s dangerous but I agree with what I’m going to quote) I agree Beno has had the one legitimate gripe about PT:

Beno Udrih is the one Kings player who has a completely legitimate gripe about playing time. Frankly, he deserves better. He is regarded among his teammates as the smartest player on the roster, and increasingly, can be seen instructing players about where to be. He is especially attention to Evans – demonstrating ball fakes and shifty moves. As TNT analyst Steve Kerr suggested during the Thanksgiving Day telecast of Kings-Clippers, Beno would be a terrific third guard on a contender. He is the player his former Spurs Coach Gregg Popovich always said he could be …. if he only grew up. Well, he has.

The reality here is, yeah. That’s the reality.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 11, 2010 12:12 PM PST up reply actions  

So if there isn't a clear rotation...

…what is it Paul Westphal is really doing wrong?

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 11, 2010 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

And I meant that Mike.

Enlighten me dude.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 11, 2010 2:59 PM PST up reply actions  

I disagree.
Omri Casspi, Donte Greene and DeMarcus Cousins. Sometimes

I mean, if they’re sometimes good enough to be starters, and sometimes not, then they’re really not consistent enough to put in the starting lineup of any team except a young, rebuilding team with no other options.

Of the three, I think Omri is the closest. He’s certainly the most consistent, but that’s not saying much. And it’s probably because he’s played professional basketball longer.

StR Token Female

by LeaguePassAddict on Dec 12, 2010 1:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm glad to see you get the point Madam LPA.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 12, 2010 7:42 PM PST up reply actions  

The only thing I would add here

Is that I don’t care at all about Pepperdine. When you look at how few coaches transition from college to the NBA or the other way, successfully, you realize that it is a whole different skill set. Reggie did very well at New Mexico, so he would have been the perfect guy to coach young players if that comparison actually held true. I think coaching a bunch of kids fresh out of high school, when they have virtually no power at all, and coaching millionaires who all think they are the best of the best is worlds apart.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 10, 2010 2:03 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Rec'd for the last line.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 10, 2010 2:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Jeez...

I don’t know about all of this mutual respect. It is disturbing. I log onto here to get my fix of Pookey knocking around newbies, being insensitive to others, and all I get is you being reasonable? Please stop!

What are you doing agreeing with well thought out and reasonable position…? Are you a replicant? Some clone gone wrong? Why can’t you just be disagreeable about things like you used to do… That would be less disturbing in a twisted and reassuring way.

You are approaching something close to respectability and I say this must stop before it is too late!

I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...

by MustangMBS on Dec 10, 2010 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

It amazes even I.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 11, 2010 9:18 AM PST up reply actions  

You mean...

It amazes even me.

Which, you know, it does.

StR Token Female

by LeaguePassAddict on Dec 11, 2010 9:47 AM PST up reply actions  

It amazes both of him

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Dec 11, 2010 9:59 AM PST up reply actions  

No I meant it amazes even I.

I was leaving me & myself out of the equation. Multiple personalities don’t count in discussions of this nature.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 11, 2010 11:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Agree100%

I have definitely been on board with getting rid of PW, but the majority of differences that I have with those opposed to firing him are ones regarding the sample time. I don’t disagree with the notion that we don’t necessarily get better this season through PW’s termination, I just believe in the power of the firing statement, as well as in any move which helps us to define what kind of team we are. System someone?

If my only difference with these folks is time frame however, I guess I’m OK with that as long as they define their expectations for this year given our team. If they will all give realistic appraisal of PW’s performance at the end of the year, then I guess I am willing to wait.

by Hoops Mike on Dec 10, 2010 3:58 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't know that I can define success in wins and loses for this year

But I can say that I’d have to see a majority of our games look like the way we played against Dallas. Crisp ball movement. Above average defense. I’d like to see Cux averaging close to a double double and Tyreke close to last years numbers or above. I’d like to see a consistent starting line-up. I’d like the dribble and drools to be the exception rather than the rule. Basically, I’d like to see a team that I could imagine going to the playoffs within the next year. If I could see most of that, I would be happy with giving Westphal another year, unless an amazing coach fell into our lap. How about you? What’s your definition of success.

"This season is another learning process for this team. There is no segment of the schedule that looms larger than the sum of the season, in my opinion."

Section 214

by SavageBeast on Dec 10, 2010 5:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
A Learning Experience on Loyalty For Sacramento Via Golden State
Lionel_small
#HereWeStay
Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration (UofL days)
Kings_sports_illustrated_small
Funny story
Small
As I sit here and watch the OKC Thunder come back against the Lakers
Waymantisdale-tz-150_small
the owners called down the thunder
Chief_petty_officer_small
Maturity in Sacramento Debacle
Small
Ryan Anderson to the Kings - Petrie's Gotta Give It A Thought
Chief_petty_officer_small
Open letter to the Maloofs
Small
Middle Ground on the Roster Situation

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G