Evans vs. Jennings is like a Pitbull vs. a Puppy
Not a Kings fan, just an NBA fan and Bleacherreport writer looking for a little bit more exposure...
Over the first half of the season, the Sacramento Kings’ Tyreke Evans and the Milwaukee Bucks’ Brandon Jennings have established themselves as the two best rookie point guards in the league.
But which one is better, and how good can each of them be?
In two separate games—Sacramento’s 118-114 victory over the New York Knicks, and Milwaukee’s 97-77 victory over the New Jersey Nets, I set out to answer that question.
Here’s the stat line of each player’s performance:
Evans: 11-26 FG, 0-1 3FG, 5-7 FT, 10 REB, 6 AST, 3 TO, 1 STL, 27 PTS
Jennings: 3-8 FG, 0-0 3FT, 1-2 FT, 3 REB, 3 AST, 5 TO, 2 STL, 7 PTS
Evans Offense
Evans has a wealth of natural talent, which he used to lead Sacramento back from a 15-point fourth-quarter deficit.
He almost always operates from the top of the key where he looks to either feed a wing down screen for one of Sacramento’s perimeter shooters, or receive a screen and go from there. If the down screen doesn’t open up, Evans will stay at the top of the key, get the ball back, and either reverse the ball or go into the screen/roll. Late in the shot clock, Evans will forego the screen and simply isolate at the top.
Whether he’s isolating or using a screen, Evans gets to the rim an incredible amount of times. Of his 26 shot attempts, 18 came in the immediate basket area, and one was a short floater. While he missed the floater and seven layups, the majority came early in the game or on indecisiveness on which hand to finish with at the rim.
Evans only finishes with his left hand when his attempts are uncontested. In traffic, he has little confidence with his left and makes shot attempts more difficult by attempting to finish with his right on the left side of the rim.
When Evans sees an opening, he covers an enormous amount of ground with his natural speed, explosive first step, and his lengthy strides. He also lulls opponents to sleep because he doesn’t play at full throttle on simple plays. His ability to change gears and play at different speeds overwhelms opponents.
Over the first three quarters, Evans played at three-quarter speed, gliding through the game, setting up teammates, and only attacking when he saw a seam to the basket or a defensive mistake.
All that changed in the second half.
Going one-on-one at the top, left-to-right spin moves straight into Jared Jeffries sent him sprawling backwards while Evans had all the space in the world to finish a layup.
A right-to-left spin left Jeffries frozen in space while Evans found himself uncontested at the basket to sink a layup.
Another drive forced a double team, where a drop off pass to Jason Thompson led to an uncontested dunk and a tied game.
The combination of terrific speed, raw strength, hang time, and creativity puts Evans on an approximate talent level as last season’s version of Derrick Rose. The natural abilities are all there.
However, Evans has major work to do on his jump shot. He still releases the ball over his head (though not as dramatically as early in the season) and doesn’t get enough extension with his elbow. As a result he has little control over where his jumpers will land, and he only connected on one of his seven attempts outside the paint.
He has good court vision and is a creative passer. Three of his assists came on good decisions in transition, two came on accurate passes on down screens, and the sixth was the game-tying dime to Thompson.
However, he failed to read the Knicks overplaying a high post entry pass and the pass was deflected. He also threw a bad pass off the dribble that was deflected out of bounds, and an attempted drive and drop was deflected by David Lee when Evans threw a chest pass that should’ve been a bounce pass.
Evans’ other two turnovers came on a palm early in the game, and a pass straight to Omri Casspi that Casspi failed to attempt to catch. Meaning that despite several bad passes and several turnovers, only once was Evans responsible for a bad pass turnover.
Despite this, Evans has a habit of putting his head down on his drives. This keeps him from inspecting the entire court and seeing events unfurling. At least twice Evans had his head away from the action when a shooter was all alone in the corner and a cutter was wide open under the basket.
Also, Evans literally does nothing on offense without the ball in his hands. Part of this is his responsibility to balance the court, but he never receives the ball with any kind of off-ball action, which limits the possibilities he has to attack. He doesn’t cut, he doesn’t fill, he doesn’t screen away, he simply stands around watching.
The only time Evans made any meaningful basketball move without the ball was on the final play of regulation where Evans was asked to inbound and make a backdoor cut, but he was defended well and the backdoor pass was easily broken up.
For Evans to continue his ascent as an elite point guard, he’ll need to dramatically improve his understanding of how to be a factor without the ball in his hands and how to attack from various parts of the court.
He also has major work to do on his jump shot, and needs to further develop his ability to finish with his left hand.
Based on raw athleticism alone though, Evans is as good as it gets at the point guard spot.
Jennings Offense
Because Milwaukee’s offense features more ball movement, player movement, and general complexity, Jennings’ has a lot more responsibility as a facilitator than a scorer in Milwaukee’s offense.
As so, Jennings’ main attack opportunities come in transition or around screen/rolls going to his left, his dominant hand.
Jennings is fairly quick, but not much quicker than the stable of ultra-quick point guards already employed in the NBA. If Jennings was quick enough to turn the corner on screens, he wasn’t quick enough to beat New Jersey’s contesting helpers converging at the rim.
Jennings shot attempts were equally distributed inside and outside the paint. In the paint, he missed three of his four layups, both his right handed attempts, and a left-handed reverse layup which was swatted by Brook Lopez.
Both of Jennings’ made jumpers were wide open. A short banker after his blocked layup bounced back to him, and an open jumper going left off a screen. A step back jumper going left, and a jumper going right were missed.
If Jennings didn’t force any shots, he forced a pair of passes.
A forced chest pass in traffic needed to be a bounce pass to reach its destination. Instead, Yi Jianlian picked up a steal. Also, an entry pass to a post player being overplayed was knocked away.
Jennings drove parallel to the foul line going right after a screen on the left side, couldn’t turn the corner against a wall of Nets, didn‘t take the jump shot that the Nets gave him, picked up his dribble in able to throw the ball back to the weak side wing, found the angle cut off, and took an extra step to find a passing lane.
His other two turnovers came when he tried to catch a pass with one hand and it rolled out of bounds, and when he didn’t meet the ball, and had it stolen by Courtney Lee, hinting at a lack of focus.
Jennings is far too small to be a reliable finisher, and his overall field goal percentage is actually lower than his three point percentage. His puny size also allows defenses to push him where they want him to go, and he’s not quick enough to compensate. While he has decent vision, he’s prone to stretches where he loses focus, and therefore isn’t adept at running an offense yet.
While Jennings is certainly okay, he’s not the difference maker Evans is.
Evans Defense
Evans’ defense was almost as bad as his off-ball offense. On the weak-side he does nothing but ball gaze, allowing Jared Jeffries to beat him back door once, though the Knicks never took advantage.
When Evans’ teammates get beat off the dribble, Evans ends up in no-man’s land, neither throwing his body in the way of the penetration, nor being in a position to contest his own man should a pass make its way to him. Worse, Evans’ closeouts are atrocious, and any quick move can either get a player past Evans, or get Evans sprawling in the air.
Evans is tentative defending screens, usually needing the screen defender to take a step back so he can go under the screen without giving up too much room for a jump shot. Even with this strategy, Evans had difficulty recovering after reading the screen.
On-ball Evans’ defense of choice is to reach around the ball handler to try and poke away the ball from behind as the ball handler beats him off the bounce.
Indeed, the only player Evans defended with success was Chris Duhon who Evans was able to stay on par with and use his long wingspan to discourage a shot over him.
Otherwise, Evans’ hands are at his sides, he doesn’t contest dribbles, and plays with no aggression whatsoever.
In other words, as talented as Evans is offensively, is as poor as he is defensively.
Jennings Defense
Due to Scott Skiles’ philosophy, Jennings is by default a better defender than Evans simply because Milwaukee’s point guards will pressure the ball up the floor.
While Jennings doesn’t make a major impact on wrecking an opponent’s philosophy, the extra second or two to get an offense set up is an intrinsic help.
Jennings is more willing to move his feet and raise his hands on defense, and he’s slightly more alert in his weak-side defense.
Jennings’ main problem is because of how tiny he is, he gets wiped out by every single screen, and on one play, even fell to the floor after getting nailed by a Brook Lopez pick.
Indeed Devin Harris screen/rolls found great success for the Nets due to Jennings’ diminutive stature. When Jennings did stay within the vicinity of Harris, as he did on one particular drive, Harris just drove to a spot 12 feet away from the hoop and shot over Jennings—something most average-sized point guard can do with regularity against Jennings.
If Jennings has some speed and quickness to play adequate defense, he needs to put on weight or he’ll be at the opposition’s mercy.
Scoreboard
Speed/Quickness
Jennings may be quick, but Evans can get to the basket at will thanks to his natural speed and his long strides. He can also shake and bake with the best of them. If Jennings may be able to beat Evans in a 40-meter dash, Evans beats Jennings to the basket.
Edge: Evans by a little.
Strength
Evans is made of steel while Jennings is a runt.
Edge: Evans by a lot.
Scoring At The Rim
Jennings is one of the worst finishers in basketball right now, while Evans has the body type and body control to be a terrific finisher. Each is uncomfortable with his off-hand, but Evans is stronger with his dominant hand.
Edge: Evans by a lot.
Jump Shooting
Evans’ form still needs major reconstructing. Jennings isn’t a terrific shooter either, but has more range.
Edge: Jennings by a fair amount.
Classic Point Guard Skills
Evans plays in a simpler offense and has somewhat less responsibility than Jennings. Both have good vision, though Jennings sometimes loses focus and Evans plays with his head down. Evans is much more of an attack guard, while Jennings is more of a distributor.
Edge: Jennings by a little.
Defense
Jennings is slightly less awful than Evans, though if Evans learns to take more pride in his defense he has more upside to become a good defender.
Edge: Jennings by a little.
Intangibles
Evans can take over games by his lonesome, as he essentially did against the Knicks. He lives in the paint, has more explosive moves, and his strength and size allow him to be dominant down low. He was given the responsibility of carrying his team back in order to win on the road and succeeded with flying colors.
However, with Evans’ attacking mindset and raw strength, it’s a wonder if he’ll eventually become a playmaking combo guard or if he’s really set in stone as Sacramento’s point guard?
Jennings isn’t even the best point guard on his own team, as Luke Ridnour’s vision, unselfishness, smarts, and tricky mid-range shooting has him on the floor in crunch time and relegates Jennings to the bench much more often than an elite point guard would be.
One caveat—Evans is given maximum playing time because he can play both guard positions, while Jennings really isn’t a two-guard at all. Also, Jennings hasn’t been given full reign to play and make mistakes with the Bucks in contention for a playoff spot.
Edge: Evans by a lot.
Final Score
Jennings has the potential to develop into an above average NBA point guard. Evans has the potential to be mentioned with the best point guards in the NBA.
Edge: Evans, and it’s not even close.
(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
39 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Mostly good stuff, but a couple of segments are flawed, one extremely
The extreme flaw is on defense. You need to watch a lot more of Evans playing. He is an outstanding defender. He has stuffed a lot of very good point guards, including Deron Williams, and I mean flat out stuff them.
He was getting beaten off the dribble by Jared Jeffries and buying JJ’s pump fakes. That’s pretty bad. He also didn’t offer much resistance on a few Wilson Chandler drives (forgivable), didn’t communicate on a back screen leading to a lob to Chandler (unforgivable), and does nothing on the weak side. His hands are at his sides, his head is fixated on the ball, all bad stuff.
I can see a few situations where he’ll play decent on-ball defense, but a lot of defense happens off the ball too, and Tyreke doesn’t play off-the-ball defense at this point in his career.
by Erick Blasco on Feb 12, 2010 8:49 PM PST up reply actions
Perhaps he didn't do too much against Knicks..
But his strength and size allow him to guard bigger opponents….not just PG’s. I think his D is better than Jennings IMO, but of course, still much more room for improvement!
Which is why I think if he ever takes defense seriously (and he’s still extremely young in his NBA career…a certain LeBron was a horrendous defender early in his career too) he can be pretty good. He has the strength to match up with two guards, plus the size. His athletic measurables are off the charts.
From the small handful of games I’ve seen of him, he looks disinterested unless he absolutely needs to make a play (the Arenas steal).
by Erick Blasco on Feb 12, 2010 8:52 PM PST up reply actions
Mostly fair criticism about Reke's D. But I do feel he is a little better than you give him credit for.
There are times where he gets a tad lackadaisical, but there have also been several instances where he has made jaw-dropping defensive stops, as some others here have mentioned.
I will agree that Tyreke needs to work on his off the ball offense, but hopefully this will be addressed in the off-season.
Thanks for writing this up. It was a pleasant read.
"Thou must give props" - Ice_9ine
Thanks for the kind words, and most non-specialist rookies struggle defensively in their rookie years. It’s part of being a rookie. NBA defense is a different animal than college defense, and I certainly expect him to improve. But I can only go by what I see, and while he’s made jaw-dropping stops, the best defenders are defenders who consistently make it difficult for their opponent, rather than make a few great plays here and there.
The fact that Evans CAN be really good defensively only means that he’s not reaching his defensive potential enough.
On the other hand, he also plays major minutes and is Sacramento’s primary scorer which drains some energy.
Still, a player being judged in the present should be judged by what he does consistently, not by what his highest and lowest moments are.
by Erick Blasco on Feb 12, 2010 9:26 PM PST up reply actions
i think
your greatly underestimating reke’s defensive abilities. he has defensive lapses, as does any other player, but more often than not i see him guard the other teams best backcourt player. he blocks above average for a pg, and is a pickpocket. as stated in your post, tyreke has the ability to change gears offensively (ie playing three quarter speed), but he also has the gift of changing gears on defense. and since we’re isolating single games to characterize and judge a player, as you are with the knicks, take a peak at tyreke’s game winner against the wizards a few months ago.
if anything, tyreke needs to improve his pick and roll/screen defense.
I hope this is not solely based off those 2 games.
1 of which was the snow game.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Not solely. This isn’t the first time I’ve seen the Bucks or Kings play (I even did a very bad video segment early in the year on Milwaukee’s defensive strategy of overplaying every screen).
But all games reveal elements of a player, and because the Bucks and Knicks each played a metropolitan area team and because the blizzard freed me up from school Wednesday night, it was a convenient week for me to do a comparison.
Nothing in how either player performed was far from his usual performances (except maybe Jennings’ turnovers, many of which were unusually bad).
by Erick Blasco on Feb 12, 2010 9:45 PM PST up reply actions
Not every player has defensive lapses. You do a lot of discrediting to players like Kevin Garnett, Kirk Hinrich, Shane Battier, and many others, who almost never take defensive possessions off.
His pickpocketing is done as a last resort and is lazy. Not many good defensive players’ strategies are to poke the ball out from behind (except maybe Rondo when trailing screens).
Defense isn’t like offense. Defense is energy related and needs constant communication and effort to keep up with opponents. Changing gears on defense is another phrase for not playing hard or smart for stretches at a time.
And I saw the Wizards game. Arenas also scored 32 that game, though I don’t remember if Evans was defending Arenas for the majority.
If Evans is going to make great plays like the Arenas steal, do it more often.
He does get props in my mind for stepping up when the game is on the line, but the handful of points given up in the second quarter could be the difference between being up two or down two late in the fourth quarter.
BTW, this post should be a reply to Harrisonyaka
by Erick Blasco on Feb 12, 2010 9:36 PM PST up reply actions
Sorry but this a silly argument
Tyreke is not the defender he has the potential to be because he’s a 20 year old rookie with less than 60 games in the league. What Erick points out are anecdotes from a game and there are many truths to it. I agree Reke is a bad off-the-ball defender and seems lazy at times on that end. But that’s fine because he’s a rookie and is barely learning.
When he applies himself and tries hard, which happens a lot too, he is a very good defender, considering (again) hat he’s only 20 years old! Yes, he’s no that good of a defender in NBA terms yet but that’s normal. He is however a good defender when you compare him to other rookies and 20 year olds.
Pointing ths out is silly because no one should expect a 20 year old rookie to be a great defender right off the bat. It’s also silly to argue about him as a defender now because he will undoubtely improve. Ths is just a circular argument that will get nowhere
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
one thing
The one thing that you can take away though is the desire to do things the right way. Jennings has almost no impact defensively either, but he doesn’t take short cuts. He pressures the ball. He tries to fight around screens (unsuccessfully). He’s somewhat aware on the weakside. He’ll probably be better prepared to being an adequate defender faster than Evans simply because its demanded that he do things the right way.
I don’t mean that as any slight towards Sacramento’s strategy. Usually bad teams have to become good before they care about defense, and Milwaukee has a more veteran roster.
But bad habits aren’t easily broken.
I did just check out basketballprospectus.com to see what the numbers are on Evans’ defense. Evans’ dMult is actually pretty good (below 1) so he must be doing something right.
by Erick Blasco on Feb 12, 2010 10:11 PM PST up reply actions
For the past month and a half,
Stephen Curry has been closer to Evans than Jennings. As Jennings is the best rookie in the Eastern half of the country, Curry may not overtake him in the final ROY voting. But if Curry and Jennings both continue to play as they are at this moment, it will be Curry that deserves to have this type of comparison to Tyreke drawn, not Brandon Jennings.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Curry
The problem I have with Curry is that he’s one of the softest players in the game. His free throw attempts per game are almost comical, and he’s a terrible defensive player too. Plus, even though Evans plays a lot of two-guard, and Curry a lot of the point, I don’t look at Curry as a point guard, especially since there are no point guard responsibilities on the Warriors. Whoever has the ball first is the point guard and that’s usually Ellis or even Maggette.
But Curry’s really produced of late and is worthy of recognition. I wish he played on a real system instead of Golden State’s all-iso all the time.
by Erick Blasco on Feb 12, 2010 10:15 PM PST up reply actions
Enjoyed reading your analysis of both players
1 – Your compliments of Tyreke Evans are obviously shared on this board. We also think he walks on water and are surprised that even with snow on the ground you didn’t see that
2 – Tyreke has the ability to be a better defender as he is strong, long and athletic. He does need more time and more teaching, but the ingredients are there, he needs to piece them together
3- The Jump shot. A work in progress. It has improved but has many gym hours to go before he can really open up his game. On the Kings he has been option #1 and option #2 since Kevin Martin went down and Kevin Martin has not yet returned to his pre-injury levels.
4 – Brandon Jennings is brash.with both his game and his personality. He has talent but agree that he is going to “ceiling out” before Evans. As Section214 remarks above – Steph Curry has overtaken Jennings in the RoY race with his stats and with his improvement. He is playing in a Don Nelson system so keep that in mind. He reads passing lanes well and makes good decisions (it is all relative, he is teamed with Monta Ellis which can make many players appear Einsteinian BB IQ wise)
Thanks for the Charley Rosen treatment. Look forward to more comments in the future.
by betweentheeyes on Feb 12, 2010 10:18 PM PST reply actions
LOL @ the Uncle Charlie treatment.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
One thing about Evans’ jumper, the mechanics are slightly better now than before. He doesn’t bring the ball behind his head like he used to. So he is putting in some time there. He’ll really need a complete offseason to overhaul it though.
I’ll try to bring some anecdotes of my CBA coaching days for an authentic Uncle Charley article =)
by Erick Blasco on Feb 13, 2010 12:51 PM PST up reply actions
Wait.
I’m pretty sure Curry is rated number two right now
by White Brocklate on Feb 12, 2010 11:00 PM PST reply actions
Great piece Erick
I think you hit most of the nails right on the head. We at STR tend to think of Evans as a really solid defender, and he gets enough steals to make it look that way. But when you read the reviews of more unbiased outside observers, you hear the same thing over and over. We are not a good defensive team right now and Evans is as guilty of that as most of our players. However, as you pointed out, with some work and additional experience he could be an elite point guard on both ends of the court. He has the speed, strength, and length to be Artest-like in his defense. I am confident it will come in time. I’ll try to read more of your posts. You did a great job of analyzing what Reke did right and wrong in teh Knicks game and where he can improve.
"And I never said I don’t like KMart. I just don’t think the duo is good for the team. They are essentially two of the same player"
Sammyp831.
A pibull could also be a puppy
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 13, 2010 11:29 AM PST reply actions
Talent versus technique
The talent is there on all fronts. The technique will follow. Defensively included.
My favorite:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cch6iu6SfE&feature=related
Tyreke is a willing and able defender
He might get tired at times for holding the ball all game but I would take him defensively over any rookie – giving Jennings an edge over him in D is asinine and makes you question how much Reke this guy has watched. His quickness for his linebacker like body has Ron Artest potential without the headgames.
Ron Rivera for Cal Head Coach. I'm a one man movement!
by bringbackbuddytrees on Feb 14, 2010 11:50 AM PST reply actions
...what's not mentioned here on this post;
…is that he is the best interviewee of all time. God forbid if he gets hurt or when he retires, ESPN will be banging down his doors for Sportscenter anchor or NBA analyst.
I do like how his wingspan is 7’1…right? I remember the pre-draft post on here from Ziller called something to the effect of “Tyreke Evans is HUGE”
Dannyboy
Reke's wingspan is 6'11.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
7'1" with gloves,
6’11" without.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Feb 15, 2010 9:51 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
rimshot
hey Section, I watched “Whatever Works” the newer Woody Allen flick on rental and if you like old Allen films (“Play it again, Sam, Annie Hall, Manhatten, Bananas”, etc) you might like this one. I did. A good ol’ fashion, NY-styled kvetch-fest.
by betweentheeyes on Feb 15, 2010 10:16 AM PST up reply actions
Jennings
above average NBA point guard? he is going to be waaaayyy better he’ll be in all-star games no reason to compare them they are both amazing
by lemmetakeutodamovies on Feb 15, 2010 1:14 AM PST reply actions
Jennings is such a great defender
that against Sacramento with 0.9 seconds left, he was taken OUT of the game. Right before Tyreke’s game winner.

by 















