Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks 90, Raptors 87: "Shump and Lin wouldn't let us lose."

Kings Crippled at the Line, Fall to Celtics 95-92

The Kings from the free throw line over the first 36 minutes of action: 17/20, or 85 percent.

The Kings from the free throw line over the final 12 minutes of action: 2/10, or (ahem) 20 percent. And one of those two makes was a shot Omri Casspi intended to miss.

Wooooo, what a painful way to lose a quite winnable game against a typically brilliant team. The Kings worked so hard from tip to buzzer, and if not for a few goofy bounces on those free throws they'd have had a marquee victory in ARCO. As it is, it's a marquee moral victory. We love those!

I'd prefer an immoral but real victory to a moral but fake victory any day (I'm sure that what the win in Detroit was, and I was happier on Wednesday of last week than Tuesday of this week). But it's hard to complain much. Remember that the Kings lost to Boston by 48 points when the Celtics visited last season. I remember, I was there, I was in excruciating "moral" pain the entire game. Brutal, not brutale. It was the most boring game I'd ever witnessed live -- the only stakes were whether Lady Ziller's second quarter bet that the Celtics would win by 50 would pay out. The loss then was a microcosm of the entire season: the Kings were routinely completely overmatched.

If this loss, a game in which the Kings held a late, brief but real lead and had two chances to tie the game from the free throw line, if this is a microcosm of the balance of this season, well then, giddy up. This team fights, and while it's not quite there, it's almost there, there enough to keep these interesting (to say the least), interesting enough to make contenders sweat when @SAC pops up on the schedule.

Star-divide

I couldn't have picked a better day to write a "I'm Not Worried About Jason Thompson" post, let me tell you that. Thompson started slowly, but I challenge you to find a better fourth quarter (ignoring two missed free throws). In the fourth, in which Thompson played nearly every second, Shock racked up six points on 3-4 shooting to go with (ready?) seven rebounds, two of them on offense. He had (still ready?) zero fouls and zero turnovers, and one block ... his fourth of the game. If you bottled the Essence of Jason Thompson on a perfect day, that'd be his fourth quarter (ignoring two missed free throws). His work on defense, on the boards, and on offense got the team in position to miss critical free throws with the game on the line. I'm not being cutely sardonic here -- with Thompson's floor work, we aren't talking about free throws. We're talking about a 7-point loss.

Similarly, another player who had a rough go at the line -- Omri Casspi -- kept the Kings in the pole position through the first quarter. Omri had 10 points in the first quarter -- he actually scored them all in one bunch, hitting four straight field goals in the middle of the period. He didn't so much cool off as the game wore on; he just didn't get as many looks. For the game? Nineteen points on 7-13 shooting, to go with six big rebounds, two blocks (including a masterpiece on Kevin Garnett), two steals, three assists, just one turnover. If not for the 2-6 free throw shooting, I dare say that'd have been a perfect game.

Tyreke Evans hit 6-8 free throws before missing a pair early in the fourth. As Boston's defense cinched up in the fourth, Reke had trouble breaking past Rajon Rondo into the paint. It was, again, really Thompson's activity and stroke that opened up the offense enough to get the Kings into a one-possession game late. Kevin Martin sat the entire fourth quarter, except for some spare seconds at the end. Paul Westphal actually sent Martin to the table with about seven minutes left. As the clock hit six minutes without a stoppage, Martin went back to the bench, waiting on the mandatory time-out. That didn't come for another two minutes plus of game time. At that point, the Kings unit on the floor -- with Evans and Beno Udrih in the backcourt, Casspi at the three, Thompson and Spencer Hawes up front -- had gotten the game to within a point; in his postgame comments, Westphal said at that point Martin indicated the unit on the floor had done so well he wouldn't be mad if they stayed out there. They did, and but for some missed free throws it would have worked.

Hawes played quite solid defense. On a late Paul Pierce three, which ended Sacramento's all-too-brief lead, I thought Hawes should have closed more quickly instead of sticking on a rolling-to-the-hoop Kendrick Perkins -- Perk was above the free throw line, Thompson was swallowing Perkins and spitting him out all game, and Paul Pierce is the mothaflubbing Truth. But otherwise, Hawes rotated well and generally caused trouble for Boston in the paint, which is a bit of a stunner, really.

***

Sean May had two blocked shots. I don't know what you want to do with that, but he did. I saw them. They happened.

***

Evans's final line: 17 points on 5-13 shooting, 11 rebounds, seven assists, one steal, one turnover. The man he marked, Rondo? Four points on 1-6 shooting, seven rebounds, six assists, three steals, three turnovers. Advantage: Rookie.

***

Welcome back, El Flaco. Roughly 1-1/2 minutes for Francisco Garcia in his return. Two fouls, one missed jumper. Can't wait to see more of him.

(Note that Flaco got only those 90 seconds or so, Andres Nocioni played 4-1/2 minutes, and Ime Udoka played a few seconds in the closing minute of each half. The Ron Artest Trade combined for 62 minutes. That's where we're headed, y'all.

***

The single biggest difference between the Kings on Tuesday night and the Kings we've seen over the past two months: the interior defense was astoundingly outstanding. Boston shot 11-23 at the rim. The C's usually shoot 65 percent at the rim, and Kings opponents typically shoot 65 percent at the rim. Had Boston shot 65 percent at the rim Tuesday night, they would have hit 15 of 23 shots, an extra eight points. So, um, interior defense matters! Keep it up, kids.

Comment 62 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Chapu doesn't miss free throws, especially in clutch situations.

Too bad he barely got any playing time against the Celts.

"Oh, y ahora ¿quién podrá defenderme?" "¡Yo!"

by chapuforyou on Feb 17, 2010 6:17 AM PST reply actions  

Kevin Martin

Martin’s critics argued that he couldn’t handle not being the alpha dog, that he couldn’t take a backseat to others (specifically Tyreke). His actions yesterday should decimate this argument. Sadly, I fear this will be lost as Martin’s critics attack him for not wanting to the “the man” in the final minutes of this game. In other news, critics would enjoy having their cake and eating it too.

Never forget: I am a complete idiot

by Exhibit G on Feb 17, 2010 6:21 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Usually I love Kmart, but not this time.

I am a Martin fan, but his desire to sit out crunch time doesn’t strike me as leadership, but rather a weak mental approach. No other leading scorer/leader in the league would allow himself to chill on the bench while others try to win. I don’t like it. It definitely makes me question what is going on in Kmart’s head.

by amonk81 on Feb 17, 2010 7:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Thanks for validating my point

Martin was called “mentally weak” when Napear decided that Martin couldn’t handle the idea of not being the alpha dog.

Now he’s getting called mentally weak for letting teammates continue playing when they had been playing well.

Hindsight is 20/20, but this would not have been an issue at all if the Kings had made a couple of free throws.

Never forget: I am a complete idiot

by Exhibit G on Feb 17, 2010 7:34 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I don't agree. This is an issue... period.

Screw what Napear said. Sitting the 4th out, like Kmart did, just doesn’t strike me as the actions of a player who really wants to be out there competing. Perhaps Kmart thought he was doing the correct thing, but it does signify a strange and perhaps weak mental approach to the game. I think PW is at fault here as well. He should have told Martin to get his ass in the game. Finally, what teammates were playing so damn well that Martin shouldn’t return? Beno? Give me a break.

by amonk81 on Feb 17, 2010 9:35 AM PST up reply actions  

This is a coaching decision and not a player's decision

Who plays and how long is up to the coach. This doesn’t reflect on the player at all. If Martin were to say that his coach was wrong and publicly state that he was upset or something like that for not being in the game it would be a big issue. He takes his orders and plays as the coach directs him to play, or not.

by MustangMBS on Feb 17, 2010 9:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Aside from the some nice 1st quarter ball movement

Martin was a non-factor. His shot wasn’t falling, and his defense wasn’t very good. And, in fact, Beno was playing well – better than Martin on this particualr night. Beno was not only shooting well. He was also making excellent cuts that were giving at least a little breathing room amidst the excellent Boston half court defense.

by Kusian on Feb 17, 2010 9:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Kevin seemed to control Allen (5-15) from my point of view

I don’t know why you think he had a bad defensive night. Guys like Allen are going to get free for some shots – thats who they are.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Feb 17, 2010 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

And

The shots that Allen got off were from some serious screens. Some of which could have been illegal as I saw movement and Martin hitting the floor on at least two of the made shots.

by MustangMBS on Feb 17, 2010 1:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Allen is a tough cover

but Kevin consistently gets beat by players who don’t have his foot speed, and he’s terrible at getting through screens, which I know is difficult but nevertheless something good defenders have to do.

by Kusian on Feb 17, 2010 1:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Beno

Beno’s eFG% was 56.3, Martin’s was 30.
Beno’s True Shooting % was56.3, Martin’s was 43.5.

I know Beno’s name isn’t as flashy around here, but Martin was having an off night. Martin was 3-10 from the field last night. What if Martin demanded to be in the game and then went on to miss every shot he took?

Never forget: I am a complete idiot

by Exhibit G on Feb 17, 2010 10:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Tyreke and Beno

have been the Kings most consistent players this year. Beno has had a very solid year – especially compared to last. I’ve got no complaints about our back up PG/SG besides his slightly below average lateral quickness, which impacts his D against very quick players.

by Kusian on Feb 17, 2010 10:35 AM PST up reply actions  

Creampuff
What if Martin demanded to be in the game and then went on to miss every shot he took?

I’d say he should come back in the next game and keep shooting.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 17, 2010 12:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Absolutely

He has to do what he does best: shoot. If he is not making an impact it’s up to PW to make a choice concerning playing time.

by Kusian on Feb 17, 2010 1:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Hawes and the offense

Every time I see the offense run through Hawes we seem to get easy baskets. Last night he had a great pass to ( fill in the blank) while he was on the baseline. He is a very gifted passer and seem to help, and when he gets that chance his defense seems to improve because he is part of thegame vs being in the game. IMHO we need to run quitre a few more plays through Hawes so the whole team benefits

by want2win on Feb 17, 2010 6:31 AM PST reply actions  

*Search and Replace Hawes to Chapu

"Oh, y ahora ¿quién podrá defenderme?" "¡Yo!"

by chapuforyou on Feb 17, 2010 6:40 AM PST up reply actions  

Great game to watch

The Kings played with great energy, and had a nice swarming defense around the basket. Both teams seemed to have a high level of intensity throughout the game. Oddly, even though there were a lot of free throws, it felt like the refs let them play for the most part. To the point that I wondered if it was getting a bit too physical out there.

Our boys had an awful stretch of outside shooting in the second half – that, combined with the missed free throw parade made it too big a hill to climb. The most frustrating part was a sequence (late in the third I think?) where three straight outside shots by the Kings were halfway down but spun out. I figured at that point it might not be our night.

As to Kevin in the 4th – well, when the coach tells you to go in the game, you go in the damn game. If you want to coach, hang up the sneakers and grab a clipboard.

"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty

by otis29 on Feb 17, 2010 7:01 AM PST reply actions  

Easily the most enjoyable viewing game of the year

Nice point, Otis, about the officiating: they let them play. I thought it was outstanding, actually. To me it was just about the perfect balance. Jerry Reynold’s reference to it being a game for “full grown men” left no doubt the official were letting them play. And the beauty of it was that our young men were freakin’ bringing it all night long! How about all those blocks? Thompson, Hawes, May, Caspi were all physical from the start to the finish. They were not intimidated at all by the multiple All Stars line up.

Aside from the below average shooting, this was as happy as I’ve been with this team the entire year. The played hard and smart. They competed against a very good team . And they believed they could win down to the final 0.7. Simply a very fun game to watch from a King’s fan perspective. Of course, I hoped they’d win, but for a lot of different ways I was happy with the effort. This is a game from which they can build something positive.

by Kusian on Feb 17, 2010 7:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Funny

I felt the same way – I’m not a big proponent of the “moral victory”, but it was a great game to watch. I loved what the frontcourt brought last night…there were very few easy baskets for the Celtics around the rim.

There was a lot of good stuff to take away from that game, outside of the Kevin/Westphal issue at the end.

"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty

by otis29 on Feb 17, 2010 8:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Agreed about Kevin.

So he had to wait a little bit before entering the game, what is the big deal with that?

To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.

by Slam_Dunk on Feb 17, 2010 8:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Can't be mad at the team, played great except those FTs ><

And I think Martin not playing in the 4th is being made too much of. If there’s anything we’ve learned about Westphal, its that he goes with what’s working. He put the best defenders out there and last night it worked great and almost won the game. Omri was much hotter than Kevin.

The NBA: "Where 27 free throws happens"

by lodisacfan on Feb 17, 2010 7:30 AM PST reply actions  

Kev was at the scorer's table...

…and he didn’t get into the game because a time out wasn’t called and there never was a dead ball situation… so how is it Kev’s fault? Had PW really wanted him there then why didn’t he call a time out? What am I missing here?

Hard work beats talent when talent is hardly working...

by kromeace on Feb 17, 2010 7:56 AM PST reply actions  

Kevin didn't wait for the timeout.

To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.

by Slam_Dunk on Feb 17, 2010 8:29 AM PST up reply actions  

It was only 3:28 later

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Feb 17, 2010 8:49 AM PST up reply actions  

and I may have missed something

but Westhpal, didn’t say Martin did not want to go in the game. He said Martin was ok with PW’s decision not to send him in the game at that point because the guys that were on the court were playing well.

by markdog333 on Feb 17, 2010 8:52 AM PST up reply actions  

It was a joke

I wasn’t really correcting you. I should have added the :-)

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Feb 17, 2010 11:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Great defense

That was the best defense I’ve seen a Kings team play in several years. Quite a block party. If they play like that every night, we’ll have no worries.

The young guys just need to shoot those clutch time free throws like they were in the second quarter. Same routine regardless of what point in the game it is. Naturally easier said than done. They’ll get there.

Not sure what to make out of the Martin 4th quarter deal. He seems to be a reluctant warrior these days. Maybe a case of Arcophobia acting up? They still need to get him the ball a little more when he’s coming off screens.

Onward and upward.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 17, 2010 8:15 AM PST reply actions  

The Kings played a great game last night

But to lose by missing so many free-throws??? That was disappointing and a missed opportunity to beat a good team.

To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.

by Slam_Dunk on Feb 17, 2010 8:25 AM PST reply actions  

What I liked most about this loss

is that the Kings beat themselves. That will change with experience. I will take that over getting beat by the refs. We all know that happens far too often for the Kings especially against elite teams.

I love beating dead horses.

by allbenji's on Feb 17, 2010 8:54 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

How about a caption for the picture above

Allen was oblivious to the fact that Martin was doing his brockness monster impersonation behind his head.

by markdog333 on Feb 17, 2010 8:55 AM PST reply actions  

We all need to send a comparison to Bill Simmons of Tyreke and Rajon's stat lines.

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Feb 17, 2010 9:10 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Also, that Eric Blasco character

Tyreke doesn’t play defense? Then why does every point guard he play against end up with a bad game?

Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut

by Ice_9ine on Feb 17, 2010 9:12 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

You mean like

Steve Nash?

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 17, 2010 12:22 PM PST up reply actions  

He has problems with some of the real fast ones

But he does a good job on the rest.

Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".

by Aykis16 on Feb 17, 2010 3:33 PM PST up reply actions  

He's not alone

Lots of people have problems covering Steve Nash. He kind of lost it the past couple of seasons, but he’s playing as well as ever this season.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 17, 2010 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

This is the one game where

I had absolutely no qualms with the officiating. Sure, Jason got away with a foul, but then they let KG get away with one. This game was entertaining, the fouls were called consistently throughout, and the Kings couldn’t hit their free throws.

by VenomySnicket on Feb 17, 2010 9:37 AM PST reply actions  

how "moral playoffs" didnt get Rec'd

I don’t understand.
This was a phenomenal game! Makes me want to keep everyone and just let ‘em learn how to win together. But I’m still looking forward to trade day. I am a huge Kevin Martin fan, but I do wonder if this team is better without him. Granted we haven’t seen him go off for 40 yet. But imagine another aggressive defender at the 2.
Soooo cool to see ’Cisco back BTW! Go Kings.
How come no one mentioned Hawes fantastic D? He was amazing!

by TheFNG on Feb 17, 2010 10:11 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Agreed

Spencer was very good on D last night. And, more importantly, he remained focused defensively despite having a few nice looking shots fail to fall. Often when that happens, Spencer will lose focus on the defensive end.

by Kusian on Feb 17, 2010 10:37 AM PST up reply actions  

What was nice about Spencer's D

is he was very patient, didn’t fall for the fakes, didn;t get pushed out the of the way, just held his ground and altered a lot of shots.

"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."

by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 17, 2010 12:24 PM PST up reply actions  

JT throws fans a crumb, and everyone pounces, lol

Not to take away from the effort, because relatively speaking he was brilliant. Compared to other games, he was all-world. But a star level player post the same numbers, and he gets labeled the goat for missing the freebies to tie the game.

The fact is the Cs were rotating their defense to Tyreke, drifting off JT, and he still did not make half his shots (6 for 14). His shot blocks were result of Big Baby Davis being glued to the floor, and off of KG, who has 60 year old knees. Both those guys play well below the rim, a rarity among NBA bigs. For crying out loud, Omri was swatting away KG!

At the end, JT threw in a face up 5 footer that looked purely accidental, and made a couple of scores by virtue of being unguarded. Cs were daring him to shoot! Again, by comparison to recent efforts, this was something. But when he stepped to the line I said to myself “no way are these going in”, and he affirmed my faith.

JR made interesting comment the other day that JT’s best position may be center. Read between the lines, and I think this may be a conciliatory statement he does possess the skills to be a starting PF. With all the attention Tyreke gets, our bigs should be torching the paint. With JT, there is barely a flicker.

by bench_blob on Feb 17, 2010 11:06 AM PST reply actions  

I agree to a point

and am certain that whatever the final outcome may be in year or two we obviously need more options.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Feb 17, 2010 11:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Unfortunately, I agree with your assessment of JT

If he could learn to keep the ball above his head like Pau does, he would be worlds better. You NEVER see Gasol get blocked because he dunks too fast. They don’t look pretty or particularly athletic, but by virtue of not bringing the ball waist high so he can jump higher, he gets rid of the ball too quickly to adjust to. Plus he has to stop crying about his fouls. He does get picked on by refs a bit but even when he fouls the crap out of someone he gets all bent out of shape. If anyone on the team is “mentally weak” it’s him.

by TheFNG on Feb 17, 2010 11:53 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I think we can all agree

he’ll never be as skilled as Pau Gasol…just like almost every other big guy in the NBA.

What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.

by Grasul on Feb 17, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Pau may not look athletic

but he’s very athletic. Dude jumps quickly, moves fluidly, and has tons of skils.

by Kusian on Feb 17, 2010 1:17 PM PST up reply actions  

If he's as bad as you think he is

you will have plenty of opportunities to hate when he has bad games right?

He played well, no ifs, ands or buts about it; he had a good game. The fact you’re attempting to make apologies for the Celtics is just pathetic. Almost everyone on this board has been slobbering all over themselves to get Kendrick Perkins, and KG may have bum knees, but he’s also going to the Hall of Fame. JT outplayed those guys last night; doesn’t mean anything in the big picture, he’s supposed to have some good nights, but trying to bash last night is weak.

Try to be a little less myopic about it, you’ll get your chances to take your shots at him.

What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.

by Grasul on Feb 17, 2010 12:38 PM PST up reply actions  

All I am doing

is putting JTs performance in proper perspective. Barring FT chokes, I do give him credit for not wilting in crunch time like he has so many times before. Show me more and I may be inclined to bash him less frequently. Unlikely, lol.

JT was opportunistic against an old and slow team that paid him little regard. If you want to believe differently and that he is a starting PF of the future, go ahead. I think you will be disappointed. Watch tonight and see: JT rarely plays well in consecutive games. I expect a foul prone, 3-12 FG, 3 TO, 6 rebound stinker. OK maybe I am being too hard on him… 4 for 12 FG, lol.

by bench_blob on Feb 17, 2010 1:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Where in my post did I say he is the starting PF of the future?

In fact, this is what I said:

“JT outplayed those guys last night; doesn’t mean anything in the big picture.”

If he’d have gone 3-14 with 2 rebounds and 5 fouls, you’d be here (rightfully) killing him for it, its no win. All I’m saying is step away from the blinders; I get you don’t think he’s got a future. You’ve made that abundently clear. But when he plays well, either acknowledge it or just be like most and don’t say anything about it. Trying to find excuses for the Celtics of all teams to detract from JT playing well is lame.

What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.

by Grasul on Feb 17, 2010 1:19 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Why #SayYes?
H0zca7s150tca95sfjscanfe1ybca7g7ohsca7s2phecadcfkcgcavang23cazdt3fpca3lwbl6ca97c92mcagt08cqca9mblmqcatpyt5lcano3ozbcapa2qy9caf2uy7ocaatxycicazwnb2scahv7ame_small
A Kings Fan's Guide To Yiddish
Demarcus-cousins-cho_small
A Micromoment in Time
Demarcus-cousins-kentucky-university-gestures-after-being-selected-the-sacramento-kings-the-fifth-overall-pick-the-2010-nba-draft-new-york_small
Just rewatched the game on TNT after being there....
Webber_in_tuxedo_small
A Story Within the Enemy Camp

Recent FanPosts

Elrontoro_small
Here is Cohn's positive response to my email
Small
Jj Hickson
Darth-vader_small
No Jimmer in the 3 point contest?!?!
Small
This Week's Asinine Trade Thread, February 12-20
Small
Here's to hoping for the best
S113399682030553_3084_small
Fan from a Far

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G