My Case for John Wall
This post is not only going to try to make a case for John Wall, but is also going to give my thoughts on the K-Mart trade and about the 2010 free agency period. I hope you find my thoughts and perspectives interesting.
Well as of today, we have an 11.9% chance of winning the first overall pick in the NBA draft. After doing some quick analysis and contemplation, I've decided that if we win the lottery, we have to draft Wall, whom the scouts and executives are calling one of the prospects of the decade. Of course, here in Sacramento, we have a bit of a problem. We have Tyreke Evans who in reality is far the opposite of a 'problem.' Tyreke has come in this league and dominated from Day 1. His amazing driving and slashing ability has won many of our hearts here at Sactown Royalty. He might end up being the greatest draft pick in Sacramento history. Obviously we must build this team around Tyreke and his strengths. Here's why I think Tyreke could pair well with Wall:
1) As Ziller has tried to point out to us at various times, when Sergio used to be on the floor our offense gained a whole new dimension. Sergio would push the pace and make great passes which would really open this offense up. In fact Sergio and Tyreke are a combined +55 points this year. I think that because Tyreke is a great slasher and a creative finisher, he would really benefit from a pure point guard setting him up and pushing the tempo. I saw a bit of this also at the rookie-sophomore game when Flynn and Jennings set up Tyreke for some nice layups. Wall, with his great passing instincts, could also dish to Thompson and Landry around the basket. The addition of Wall could be great for this offense which is known to stagnate at times. Also on a quick note, you could have one of these guys on the floor at all times to initiate the offense which would just be amazing and would take great pressure off both of them.
2) Having Wall and Tyreke in our backcourt will also make for a nice defensive combo in the future. Wall has great speed and athleticism while Tyreke has great length and strength. These two will make a great defensive duo if they commit themselves. They would generate good amounts of steals and blocks which would open up the transition game.
3) At the end of games, we will have two premier options with which to work. Westphal will be able to decide who controls the ball depending on who played well and matchups. I distinctly remember the Cavaliers game when Tyreke was smothered by Lebron and we really had no other great options. Having Wall in that situation would be perfect.
Well okay, I'll adress the elephant in the room. They are both below average shooter. Ok, with that said, why can't they both improve? Lebron came into the league a below-average shooter, and now look how he's drilling jumpers over teams. The jumpshot is a relatively easy thing to fix (note "relatively"). Also we have Casspi and Garcia to drill 3's for us and spread the floor. Also Landry can hit the mid range.
Well that my logic for a potential Tyreke-Wall pairing. The fact of the matter is any two players can work together. (Yes I said "any") if they put the team and winning above everything else (above statistics and their own ego).
Random Thoughts:
K-Mart Trade:
Positives;
- Of course we get that consisten low post scorer in Landry who can complement this team well. Plus he's cheap next year.
-The cap space is always great. We get rid of a four year committment.
- K-Mart, from what I heard, simply couldn't handle pressure to pair with Tyreke and wanted out. He is also a bit injury prone.
- Like Ziller, I see Landry as a forward version of K-mart.
-Opens up time for Casspi, Donte and Cisco (the future of our SF+ Backup SG/SF)
Negatives:
- We should have tried to acquire some draft picks or at least unloaded either Beno or Nocioni in a K-Mart Deal like this. Overall I just felt, like many others here, that we could've gotten more.
- Landry is not a good rebounder (especially defensive) or defender- which are the attributes we sorely lack. I don't see him being able to average over 7 boards.
-Landry is also a bit older than I would prefer for our young team- he's 26.
-I still think we should have been patient and let Tyreke and Martin mesh the rest of the year and see if it worked. I mean in theory, it's the perfect match. (A driver + a gunner.) We could've dealt him for a high draft pick (New York's pick which is Utah's).
Free Agency: Like some others on this site, I'm afraid of what Petrie will do with the cap room considering none of the big ticket players will likely come here. Petrie doesn't have a good track record for signing middling, role players. The only real, solid signing I can see is David Lee to a 4 year, $44 million deal (through age 31).
Well that's all I got. Oh wait, if we don't get John Wall, I want Cole Alrich (just throwing that out there). Please feel free to poke hole in my logic, but please be respectful. Thanks for reading.
Quick Random Poll:
(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
1 recs |
34 comments
|
Comments
Great post first off...
But the one thing that I don’t like about Wall/Evans is that I feel like 2 back-court combo guards would not work well. I mean you have Bibby/Christie; Fisher/Bryant; ?/Jordan etc. So to me, the idea of drafting a big is better than Wall. Although I would not necessarily be drafting Aldrich. Although I like him, I have two better prospects in mind.
1) Derrick Favours (Georgia Tech)
Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry long, I mean like 9’ wingspan long. Although he doesn’t solve our C logjam, he is very, extremely, utterly capable of grabbing 10 NBA boards when entering the league. A defensive mastermind.
2) Donatas Motiejunas (Latvia)
Yes, I know some of you have never heard the name. But trust me, around 7’1/7’2 very smooth shooter, and can just score. He has size he can add to his frame, but the sky is the limit. I dare say, almost Vlade-esque if I may.
I'm Italian
so I get to see Motiejunas every week and this is what I think about him: NO.
I don’t like him, he has a complete lack of energy, his shot is not even similar to Bargnani’s and Dirk’s and he can’t rebound. He may turn out being a very good player, but I’d prefer seeing him doing it on a non-purple jersey.
I’d be very intrigued if Whiteside declared for this year draft, for I think he would be the perfect player for us.
"Even when I’m old and grey, I won’t be able to play it, but I’ll still love the game." — Michael Jordan
Go Kings!
I'm a Whiteside fan (because I follow Marshall University)
However, I do not think he will be seasoned enough to even help a lottery bound young team like the King’s next year.
He also reminds me more of Marcus Camby than anything a very good to great help defender while not being strong enough to body up the big guys and defend.
He has the motor and is a great rebounder and shot blocker (like Camby) but If he declares this year and we draft him he will be sitting on our bench learning the game that way (Similar to Mullens in OKC not that they are similar players but that they will both be stuck to the pine)
I like Whiteside and if we are able to draft him and WAIT then great… though I think another year of seasoning might be best.
Blessings.Love.Peace
by lifestyleforthesellout on Feb 20, 2010 10:45 AM PST up reply actions
Damn West Virginians following Marshall.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
hahaha!
My parents both graduated from there. But I was born in Fresno. I like Marshall because my dad was a big fan growing up.
Go Herd!
Blessings.Love.Peace
by lifestyleforthesellout on Feb 23, 2010 2:13 PM PST up reply actions
The best reason there is sellout.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Donatas can't rebound
The great thing about Favors is that he is super young, a true freshmen. Turns 19 in August. Whereas some other really good frosh are actually older; Hassan Whiteside is 2 years older than Favors. So, imagine Favors in 2 years getting oops from Tyreke.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 22, 2010 9:32 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Solomon Alabi = young Dikembe Mutumbo
its a no brainer for Petrie
I don't see how you can argue Petrie would do a bad job with the cap space
and then turnaround and argue for David Lee, which 4 years $44mil would be a horrible signing for us. Lee does the same things Landry does, except he rebounds better and isn’t as much of a goto scorer. Why do we need Lee when we have Landry here? He’s not going to help our defense materially.
Last thiing, don’t get too wrapped up in late first round draft picks. You only need so many of those guys, they take court time to develop and not all of them turn into Omri Casspi. With our available money, we can almost always buy the picks if we really want one, but at some point you have to start building a core of players, and not keep auditioning lots of low potential (because they are late first round) players.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
But imagine...
we get the #2 pick and take Evan Turner/Cousins, and with a mid 1st pick, we take Solomon Alabi/Xavier Henry
Two lineups
Reke
Turner
Casspi
Landry
Cousins
or
Reke
Henry
Casspi
Landry
Alabi
Tyreke Evans for R.O.Y!
by sac-townz finest on Feb 20, 2010 7:42 AM PST up reply actions
People always love college kids that haven't played in the NBA yet
and then they get to the NBA and reality hits. With our presumably Top-5 or so pick I expect we’ll get someone with a bright future, and will immediately contribute. There’s no mid-first round pick big guy in the upcoming draft with more than a remote chance of being better than Spencer Hawes or Jason Thompson next year. Any of those guys drafted will be sitting behind actual NBA players for several years more than likely.
Alabi, isn’t that the guy they say is the “next Dikembe Mutombo”? I’ve got news for you, if the actual Dikembe Mutombo was in this draft, he’d be the stone cold #2 pick and no one would be doubting it. Saying some kid you are going to get with the #15 pick is the next Mutumbo is a sick joke played on people that haven’t watched the NBA for any length of time.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
by Grasul on Feb 20, 2010 8:07 AM PST up reply actions 3 recs
Bottom line
We luck out and get the #1, we take Wall, and let Petrie sort it out. Evans can spend some time at the 3, as far as I’m concerned, I’m not passing up the chance to see athletes of this caliber in Kings uniforms.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen.
by andy sims on Feb 20, 2010 9:00 AM PST reply actions 3 recs
Evan Turner is a close second
has great skills and can do it all. No glaring weaknesses.
by betweentheeyes on Feb 20, 2010 12:53 PM PST up reply actions
Another thing to think about with John Wall is his trade value
If we get that first pick other teams will want it badly. That’s how you land a big name free agent. I would lure the big name guys with the promise of getting to play with Tyreke or John Wall. I’d keep one of those two and ship the other off for a sign and trade. If we got after Bosh I’d try to trade Wall to Toronto. We’d then basically be able to absorb the rest of Bosh’s max contract as well. Who are they gonna get in a sign and trade better than Wall. Same thing with Lebron, except I’d send Tyreke to Cleveland so James can play with his buddy Wall. Once again, who better can Cleveland get?
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Feb 20, 2010 11:18 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Good point about being able to absorb his contract too.
Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
You think
Cleveland would trace LeBron for Evans? Sorry can’t see that.
StR Token Female
by LeaguePassAddict on Feb 20, 2010 4:06 PM PST up reply actions
If LeBron wants to leave they have no choice
he’ll go to Danny Ferry and say “Listen, I want to play in Sac. I’d like a 6th year on my contract. You can sign and trade me and get Tyreke Evans, or I’ll leave for nothing.” What does Ferry say to that?
www.mancancook.net
to play with John Wall if we get the first pick
"Oh boy! If you don't like that you don't like Kings basketball"-Peaches
as much as everyone Loves wall
I don’t think LeBron would leave cavs to play with a kid who hasn’t played in the NBA, I can see him doing that to go to the heat or magic, because they have proven stars….Wall is a kid with potential….
by shadowchicken on Feb 21, 2010 1:58 PM PST up reply actions
... Who is a phenomenal passer and a freakish athlete.
And Wall will worship LeBron. The King likes talented PG’s that worship him (Mo!). Wall is better than Mo. And Wade/Howard won’t worship the King.
Not saying that it’s a shoe-in, but whoever gets Wall coming in as a rook has a pretty good shot at wooing LeBron.
"Thou must give props" - Ice_9ine
by tomroadrunner on Feb 21, 2010 3:18 PM PST up reply actions
The elephant in the room
Okay, let me see if I get this straight. You are making an argument that Tyreke and John Wall will make a “dynamic” guard duo, but their weakness is that they are both poor shooters. But, you have a solution for that – to fix the shooting weaknesses in both shooters. Also you are saying that they could make a great defensive duo IF they commit themselves.
Sounds like a lot of “ifs” to me.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
And wishful thinking
There was a lot of wishful thinking about Kevin Martin and Tyreke Evans, but we all know how that panned out. And Kevin did have the shooting ability.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
True...
it is wishful thinking, but i’m basically just saying how i could see the two of them work together.
I'll give you that.
They did have their opportunities, but for the most part it didn’t live up to expectations.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Evans is a 2
That’s the way it is, and everybody needs to start realizing that. The Kings need a point guard. They also need a big man that provides strong defense and rebounding, but they are both needs. Wall is hands down the best player in the draft, and he’s a point guard. He’s not a combo guard, he’s a point guard.
Yes, the man scores very well, but in his freshman season, he’s averaging 6.3 assists per game. Chris Paul, in his freshman season, averaged 5.9 assists and 6.6 in his sophmore season.
John Wall could be a god send for our team.
Not to poop in anyone's cereal...
…but we won’t get the #1 pick. This is the Kings we’re talking about.
A lonely Kings fan in a sea of gold and purple...

by 

























