Meet Paul Westphal the Decider
The Spencer Hawes Incident is simply that: an incident, incidental in the day-to-day haps of our favorite team but telling of a greater truth. And that truth should be more fairly clear at this point: Paul Westphal has a lot of power in this organization. And I don't mean a lot in the way many coaches have a lot of power. I mean A LOT.
Remember this passage from the Bee's Sam Amick just after the trade of Kevin Martin?
[I]t was no coincidence that Kings basketball president Geoff Petrie referenced his coach several times when explaining the trade Thursday. Wespthal's voice was heard loud and clear as it pertained to this trade, which takes us to the present.
This after a long quote from Westphal in which the suggestion Westphal didn't do much to reintegrate Martin after he returned from injury is thoroughly and a bit forcefully debunked by Westphal. (The most notable line in that quote: "He got 20 points a game shooting under 40 percent" -- just a bit high and tight there, Westie.)
The implication in both Amick's line and Westphal's reaction is that Westphal specifically didn't think Martin was working well with Tyreke Evans, and that Westphal endorsed switching it up.
And boom. Martin's traded.
Westphal has been involved in front office work in the past -- specifically, he was an off-site player personnel executive for Dallas last season. And maybe that's a bit of the norm elsewhere in the league, the coaching staff mixing with the front office and vice versa. But it's never been the case here. Despite appearances Petrie and Rick Adelman were tyte tight bros, that was heavily refuted upon Adelman's exile, and Adelman's staff -- most notably Elston Turner -- were critical of the lack of defensive-minded players acquired by the front office. Eric Musselman lost all credibility with his DUI; Reggie Theus adored Ron Artest but saw him traded away from right underneath him. The front office has always been the front office. It's a tight-knit, small group, as ESPN's John Hollinger said last week. This is a club, one to which coaches had not previously been invited.
But here's Westphal, being "heard loud and clear" as the team's top veteran and one-time franchise face gets traded away, and a week later benching the team's 21-year-old one-time Golden Boy center for fairly innocuous comments parrotted by teammates. This is Paul Westphal the Decider. I'd advise you get used to him.
***
This isn't a criticism. It's an analysis. Take it as such.
624 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
PW's post game comments
are now nowhere to be found, completely gone.
Who decided that? PW or Petrie or the Maloofs?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
Found them here...
http://www.sacbee.com/2010/02/24/2560353/kings-notes-outspoken-hawes-left.html
Hard work beats talent when talent is hardly working...
Or I should say I found the most damaging ones here
Hard work beats talent when talent is hardly working...
The video of his Post game has been pulled from everywhere I can find
Thats what I meant. Not on YouTube, nowhere.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Feb 24, 2010 11:39 AM PST up reply actions
Yup...ALL videos gone...
Nice censorship by the Maloof’s? Maybe afraid of yet more fans not giving a flying phuque?
Hard work beats talent when talent is hardly working...
Video is back
This time slightly more extended than the original.
Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
Thanks Aykis.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I recommend you have your volume up at the end
to hear the questions being asked.
Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
I'm doing that now. Thx for the tip.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I just watched it
Thanks for the link Aykis.
Was there more at the end. That was barely a smirk, that was more like the hint of a smirk. That can’t be what’s got everybody so upset at PW.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
Yep.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
You probably want to read more of the background
there was more.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Yeah we gotta get used to it....
looks like with all this control he’s gonna be here a while and we need to support him as best we can. let’s hope we don’t sour too soon…. but he needs to cool it w/his smart little comments until he takes us to the playoffs. and no i will not buy a hubacher cadillac!
I don’t know if that last bit is going to keep you out of the dog house. I won’t be surprised if I see you in street clothes in the stands for the next game…
by Merickel on Feb 24, 2010 11:32 AM PST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
I think your not giving Petrie enough credit
He would not do a trade unless HE felt it was right for the team, or the Maloofs told him to. Petrie has shown in the past that he is not the kind of guy to get pressured into anything by anyone that doesn’t give him a paycheck. I think if it ever comes to Westphal trying to Larry-Brown Petrie, Petrie would make it clear who is the coach and who can fire the coach.
Phil Jackson, after treatment for a kidney stone "When the anesthesiologist leaned over me, he said "We named your kidney stone Kobe because it's not passing."
True
The trade doesn’t happen if Petrie doesn’t want it to in the end. But don’t discount a strong (by volume, if nothing else) voice having great influence.
Petrie as more inclusive?
I think this goes back to the information that came out earlier in the season. Supposedly, Mason was picked up at PW’s insistence and the Brockman acquisition was linked to Hawes pushing for him. I was surprised by both of those pieces of information and wondered if the inclusiveness came from the Asst. GM Levien… That seemed to be the only change in the tight knit club that is the FO…
David Thorpe made a comment in his chat today
that the coaches in Sacramento felt that Martin was only good enough to be a bench scorer.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 24, 2010 11:50 AM PST up reply actions
Coming back off of injury it would have been better to ease him into the game
It doesn’t seem like PW did the best by the team or by Martin by throwing him into games for lots of minutes and not easing him into the lineup.
Which is...
… what they are doing now with Cisco, who was eased in gradually.
by henryclemente on Feb 24, 2010 2:45 PM PST up reply actions
Kind of interesting considering
Adleman is using him as a bench scorer now.
The man known simply as "Christmas Cheesesteak"
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
You're telling me that Petrie's vision bent to PW's?
This I gotta believe when I see it.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
And if Adelman had no influence....
…why was Gerald Wallace exposed in the expansion draft to Charlotte?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Keeping Anthony Peeler was cheaper
in retrospect, they should have exposed Webber in the draft. And before I get flamed, even if the Cats do take Webb, they take his 20 million dollar salary. That would have made it like an expiring contract. Knowing what we do now, that would have been a dream.
by VenomySnicket on Feb 24, 2010 5:42 PM PST up reply actions
No, Peeler had a player option and didnt pick it up
If the FO had any foresight, they would have made it a team option, picked it up, and left him exposed. But I could argue this all day…
I wouldn't say that...
I think that the vision was spelled out by the Maloofs… The way that vision comes out could look any number of ways, but this is their team and they own it. If PW is trying to put forth the team they say they want to play then it might look like PW is setting the agenda and bending GP to his vision, but that would be a mistake.
With all due respect
I didn’t ask you.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Come on man
That’s not the right attitude to take here.
As for Wallace, as we’ve discussed before: there was little other choice than to expose Wallace. And GW isn’t exactly a Petrie player in mature form, is he?
For that matter neither was Brian Grant or Michael Smith.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
But he said "with all due respect!"
Dip til I rip
by Muff209 on Feb 24, 2010 12:38 PM PST via mobile up reply actions 2 recs
heh
That’s never EVER stopped you from chiming in on a topic.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Of course not.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
And of course it won't stop me.
I think you brought up a valid point. I don’t see GP bending much for a coach, but if that coach was trying to implement a system envisioned by the owners then I can see it happening. The only thing I ever heard about the Maloofs being down on Adelman was the lack of accountability on player defense.
Is it, perhaps, relevant that the Maloofs were talking about buying the Spurs? Is that the kind of game and system that they would like to see run here? I mean that would explain the importance placed on defense by a coach that hasn’t been known for it and could explain the seemingly openness of a GM to that coaches suggestion.
I try to not read between the lines too much, but what is the vision for this team? All I see so far is the importance placed on D…
Can't play better D if you ain't got the horses....
But I figure you already knew that. Any solutions to the problem?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Yeah..
Take two years to completely dismantle the entire team.
Fire all the coaches, get rid of the players who don’t fit, and then start over completely from scratch. To do that you need to shed as much salary and have complete financial flexibility.
That mean you get cheap and inexpensive role players and young’uns who haven’t made it elsewhere to try out. It also means hanging the threat of not renewing the GMs contract over his head until he gets onboard.
It means you don’t try to win game as well cause you are building through the draft and taking the games to evaluate your young players. It is sacrificing anything that resembles good basketball in order to plan for a future that is envisioned by the new ownership.
Any organization's ownership that is stupid enough to believe that playing defense is mandatory
is stupid enough to follow something along those lines I suppose. Which of course, didn’t bring the Kings any success the last time the Maloof’s tried this tact.
I have yet to see a shred of evidence that says the trading of Kevin Martin had anything to do with someone not on the basketball staff or with the coaching staff.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
What I should have said is effective at playing defense
Every team plays defense technically by going back the other way. There are just teams who do it far more effectively than others.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
But that is what PW is doing..
He is demanding effective defense or at minimum max effort on D. Even with Max effort if an individual misses a D assignment he gets pulled. There is no team defense to speak of and no accountability as a team on D.
Players are getting pulled as soon as he doesn’t see individual D. Isn’t the one of the main criticisms that Maloofs had of Adelman? It really seems like Defense is trumping Offense in this new Kings team.
If that's happening I think it's a personal dynamic between PW & those players.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Ehmm...
I would agree if he only did this with a few of the players. He does it with almost everybody though.
What about Jason Thompson when he blows defensive assignments?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
It seems to me that
PW leaves JT out on the court regardless (unless he is in foul trouble) Bad shooting? Leave em. Bad D? Leave em. Apparently JT either has leverage over the coaching staff or he is doing more right than we are giving him credit for.
I’m more for setting up a specific rotation and letting the kids gel a bit and know OK I come off the bench I have to be ready. Ok I am a starter I need to get things moving here in the 1st and 3rd. This is (of course) over simplifying the game but still having say Donte/Beno come off the bench OK we know that we need to set the offense up and provide a spark on both sides of the ball.
The flip side is (and I remember Adelman saying this after the roster started to change after the Webber trade) Westphal is still trying to figure out this roster. We have an extremely young team we are not 100% sure of who can really bring what yet (aside from a few players like Tyreke or the roleplayers Noc/Udoka) this season (I always felt) was essentially a training camp for all parties concerned throw in the injuries to two of our top 5 players (Garcia and Martin) and the trade (which shipped out our second best player) and added a low post guy who had built a good amount of chemistry with his previous point guard and we have a bit of a conundrum.
And in all seriousness we cut a veteran player who helped during early season success at least rebounding and post D. I guess it’s just time to adjust AGAIN.
I’m anxious to see where we head the rest of the season.
Also, If we start Beno/Tyreke who helps set up the offense off the bench? Garcia? Greene? JT? (just a though I have been dwelling on)
Blessings.Love.Peace
by lifestyleforthesellout on Feb 24, 2010 2:36 PM PST up reply actions
Seems like the last few games support this
Once they won more than last year the attempts to win seem to have gone out the window. Now we are just playing guys in a scrimmage fashion to check them out.
This is also a young team that has no confidence right now.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I Agree
But even when JT is not boarding that well Westphal still seems to give him burn.
Just a basic observation I had.
Blessings.Love.Peace
by lifestyleforthesellout on Feb 24, 2010 2:54 PM PST up reply actions
Yep. This was more or less my point.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
It might have not been so much a loud voice
As passive-aggressive behavior by Westphal which indicated to Martin how he was going to be treated by the coach in the long term which motivated Martin to ask for a trade.
I would actually prefer that Westphal had gone to Petrie directly with a vision or plan and indicated that Martin didn’t really fit in his grand scheme, but I’m afraid it was a little more underhanded and nasty than that.
StR Token Female
by LeaguePassAddict on Feb 24, 2010 1:12 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Question is
Should he wield this much power?
This is a guy that wasn’t on anyone’s list of head coaching candidates during the cycle that the Kings picked him up. And now he’s able to force Petrie to eschew his normal glacial pace of decision making and trade Kevin Martin on short notice?
None of this makes much sense to me…
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I don't think he forced Petrie in any way.
The decision to trade Martin wasn’t knee jerk. They weren’t going to trade him and then Houston offered Landry. They had long ago decided they needed front court help, badly.
Plus this decision was made with the Maloof’s input I’m sure, as well as the coaching staff. We’re reading too much into it if we think this was primarily Westphal’s doing.
Plus I’ve gotta say, I trust Westphal’s instincts and direction (even though I don’t always understand them), and I think the front office does too.
by rico 59 on Feb 24, 2010 11:49 AM PST up reply actions 3 recs
Petrie is in charge of these trade decisions, not Westphal.
There is nothing to indicate that Westphal in any way usurped Petrie’s authority. There is only the indication that Petrie included the counsel of Coach Westphal in his decision. Having some influence on Petrie is a lot different than “forcing” Petrie. There is nothing to suggest that the balance of power has been violated in any way. In the final analysis, it was Petrie’s call.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Pure conjecture
But I think it may be valuable to keep in mind that Westphaul makes dirt compared with other head coaches.
It’s quite possible that the promise of a degree of control (or at least influence) within the organization was promised as further bait. I find it difficult to believe he was as unwanted as you portray him to be.
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
I never thought I agree with you but in this case I do
I’m guessing that when Westphal was hired he was given clear signs that he had two years to show progress and if not, don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. His response was likely that if that’s the case I want to have input on personnel decisions. With his coaching and front office experience they likely acceded. Also doesn’t mean by any stretch of the imagination that he has anything like total control.
No doubt it was a group decision to trade Kevin. Although Pookey respectfully didn’t ask for Mustang’s input I think Mustang got it right. From the FO’s POV, pieces (players) are going to come and go with the team keeping what they consider the best of the bunch.
Last thought: If it was Spencer’s desire and input to get Jon Brockman then the “Spencer Incident” doesn’t spell good things for Brockman’s long term future with this squad, especially if Dorsey continues to play a limited role well.
"I make love to pressure" - Stephen Jackson
As it should be
In Premier League football, the manager is the coach. He goes after the players he wants for his system, then puts them to use as he envisioned at the start. You make your bed, you lie in it…
I’m not saying this should be the case for the NBA, but you have to admit that the coach being a loud voice in these decisions makes a lot of sense.
by Rickyflip on Feb 24, 2010 11:38 AM PST via mobile reply actions
True
but this kind of power is nearly unprecedented in the NBA. From what I’ve read, many coaches are simply figureheads.
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
Call me worried
I’m trying to avoid a drastic overreaction, mostly because I expected this team to lose a lot even after their hot start, and I think a 5-game win streak can put everyone a bit on edge.
At the same time, I worry. I worry that our coach influenced the exile of a player who I liked and who also happened to be one of our best players. I worry that, on the heels of the trade, our coach is now seemingly in a feud (or at the very least, not playing nicely) with our 21-year old center.
I worry that the players are worried about the rotations. I worry that despite a widely-touted open-door policy, the players felt the need to take their concerns to the press instead of the coach. I worry that the coach has not responded to the issue of the rotations, other than to bench our 21-year old center.
All in all, I’m worried that our carpenter is blaming his tools, can’t find his measuring tape, threw away his saw, and is refusing to take his hammer out of the toolbox.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Feb 24, 2010 11:50 AM PST reply actions 18 recs
All in all, I’m worried that our carpenter is blaming his tools, can’t find his measuring tape, threw away his saw, and is refusing to take his hammer out of the toolbox.
TWSS
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Well said
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
Rec'd
Though I would say that the hammer has come out. Only not to build anything, but instead to tear down. Spencer just got the receiving end of that hammer.
by MustangMBS on Feb 24, 2010 12:35 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
that's more "crowbar"
another favorite tool for the beat down is the ‘axe handle’
by TheFifthMookie on Feb 24, 2010 2:24 PM PST up reply actions
I Agree
I don’t want to over-react but color me worried.
Blessings.Love.Peace
by lifestyleforthesellout on Feb 24, 2010 2:38 PM PST up reply actions
Bottom line for me is that we have more wins then last year.
I won’t be worried until we get to the end of a year and we can’t say that.
Ba-da
I'm not worried
I’m no Bob Vila, but when I’m working on something and the tool doesn’t fit the job or is defective, I put it at the bottom of the toolbox or toss it out and I get or buy new tools that will get the job done.
by getPGwithbounce on Feb 25, 2010 12:34 AM PST up reply actions
Westphal will only last as long as Tyreke wants him to last.
This is a players league and if Tyreke wants him gone he will be gone make no mistake about it.
If Westphal starts to lose the respect of his players, then its just a matter of time before he joins the unemployment line along with Musslehead, Reggie and Natt. The clock is slowly starting to tick and one can only wonder what Tyreke is thinking about the whole situation.
Tyreke's comments last night...
…looking forward to NEXT YEAR… that’s not good.
Hard work beats talent when talent is hardly working...
Tyreke was one of the three guys that said something about the rotations in the first place
and if Henry Abbott is a reasonably unbiased viewer of the situation, he thought Reke’s comments were the most damning in some ways.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
I do not have a problem with any of this.
… benching the team’s 21-year-old one-time Golden Boy center for fairly innocuous comments parroted by teammates.
In all due respect, Ziller, you do not know all the information as to what went into the benching of Spencer Hawes. To attribute it solely to “fairly innocuous” comments is a biased judgment on your part.
That Westphal has some say in some of the decisions made about his players is great! Nice that he has some input. Better, than if he had no voice at all, which is the case for a lot of coaches. That Westphal disciplines his players, rather than letting them get by without accountability, is to his credit.
Is this an “analysis” or stirring the pot?
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
You should read it again
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Feb 24, 2010 11:53 AM PST up reply actions
I read it. I think this is an overreaction.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
I think you missed the point..
That being that PW seems to have more influence in the FO than any other coach we have had including Adelman. This is a new development and I think the point here.
I didn't miss the point.
I do not have a problem with Westphal having some influence on important decisions which involve the players. Who knows the players better? As to actual power to make those decisions, those still rest with Petrie, not Westphal.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Here is what Westphal said
“I saw where he’s having a hard time understanding his role,” said Kings coach Paul Westphal. “He should understand it (after) tonight.”
The implication from reading that quote is that PW read the same Bee story, and had not talked to Spencer before making a decision to give him the night off.
If not, wouldn’t the coach have said “Spencer told me he’s having a hard time understanding his role”?
That being the case, why weren’t May or Evans’ comments (which were at least as harsh IMO) fitting for some type of punishment?
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I did not make the same implication as you did.
The implication from reading that quote is that PW read the same Bee story, and had not talked to Spencer before making a decision to give him the night off.
I do not see anything in his quote which would imply that he did not talk with Spencer further about this. That is a conclusion you drew from it.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
You're saying he would have left that tidbit out?
You must really like the guy.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I am saying that it was none of our business.
It was not incumbent upon Westphal to explain his actions to the press.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
It is when he uses the press as the vehicle for attacking his own players.
Or if he doesn’t, he shouldn’t question why fans speculate on his thoughts and motives. PW could make this go away by talking to Spencer and saying 20 words to the media. He chooses not to, which says a lot about the guy.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
He was disciplining a player.
He is not the first coach to use this form of discipline, sitting out a player, nor will he be the last.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
very few are arguing about the discipline
the discussion is about the unevenness of it. the method, and PW using the press and his position to massage his ego at the expense of one of his players.
Its real easy to be snarky to the press about your players when you’re the coach, real classless too.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
You are assuming that there was uneveness...
Since no one is into speculating here, I will avoid that. Instead here is a hypothetical scenario, which COULD have happened. I am not saying it did, but I can imagine this as a POSSIBILITY:
Let us say that Coach Westphal spoke with each of these players (Tyreke, Sean, and Spencer) individually about the Bee article. Further, let’s say, for the sake of argument, that Tyreke and Sean were both contrite, apologetic, and gave their assurances that this sort of thing would never happen again. Further, let’s say that the conversation with Spencer didn’t go this way. Perhaps, Coach Westphal has had a similar conversation with Spencer over similar matters. We don’t know, but that is a possibility. At any rate, let’s say, for the sake of argument that Spencer did not respond in the same contrite way as his teammates. Instead, he may have become defensive, argued his points, and complained about not knowing his “role” to Coach Westphal. Whatever. The conversation may have escalated to the point where Westphal may have felt that he needed discipline Spencer to make his point to him.
Now, I am not saying that this did happen. All I am saying is that this is one reasonable possible scenario of what may have happened. I am suggesting that people not second-guess Westphal’s actions. I am of the opinion that Coach Westphal did what he felt was the correct way to handle the matter.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 24, 2010 1:00 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I completely agree that's a plausible scenario
and if your scenario is right, I have no issue with PW sitting him for a game or more.
I have an issue with Westphal enjoying it, which it certainly seems like he has, based on the snark. He was obviously impressed with his wittiness in telling Spencer, through the press, he can figure out his role tonight. That’s the part I have an issue with, regardless of how big a pill Spencer was or wasn’t/
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
by Grasul on Feb 24, 2010 1:06 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed - Westphal could have handled the interview better.
His emotions entered into the discussion more than they probably should have. For me, he came across as being very frustrated by Spencer.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
That snark may have been in response to something Spence said.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Forming an antogonistic relationship
With one of your key players is virtually never “the correct way to handle” matters.
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
...
I thought Sean May’s comments made it clear that the reason he wasn’t disciplined was because he approached Coach Westphal after making the comments and explained that they weren’t a jab at the coach.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 1:15 PM PST up reply actions
We also don't know what's going on behind the scenes.
It could be that PW has talked numerous times to Spence and he’s just not happy about the fact he’s not starting again.
I’m in Westphal’s corner on this one. I for one welcome a coach with some gonads who will say, “listen, communicate the right way or else.”
He did say that there is an open door policy. If that’s the case, there is never a reason to go to the media and complain. Complain to the coach and leave it at that.
This isn’t that big of a deal. Westphal is doing what this team needs. He’s leading it decisively.
I dont know how
having random substitution rotations and starting players at multiple positions in consecutive games, and making pop remarks in the press himself is being a decisive leader.
If we're wrong
Westphal had a wide open opportunity to clarify. Instead, he added kindling.
Anyone who has read me for any length of time knows I’m not a pot-stirrer.
and that is the most damning point
for PW being abrasive and punitive rather than teaching or coaching through this situation
by MichaelMack on Feb 24, 2010 12:15 PM PST up reply actions
Eh
You’re a hater. Just admit it.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
by pookeyguru on Feb 24, 2010 12:17 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I do not have a long history on StR
I have a very high regard for the pieces that I have read, which you have written. However, that said, I do feel that you have lost some objectivity in this piece. Although you say it isn’t criticism, it comes across as such. IMO
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
I actually agree the piece isn't objective.
But that’s me.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Nothing's objective
And his point is accurate. So what are you bitchin’ about?
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
Does that look like bitchin?
No? Shut up.;
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Haha!
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Tee-hee.
"If you told him to head-butt the wall, he would do it." -- Paul Westphal re: Brockness Monster.
by PhutureKings on Feb 25, 2010 10:12 AM PST up reply actions
Not Objective, eh?
How is this analysis not objective enough to have some validity? You can disagree, but that is a different matter entirely.
As thelettere so aptly points out there is no such thing as pure objectivity. Everything is colored by subjectivitym but to say that author is so biased that he can’t make a point borders on the ludicrous.
Premise:
Paul Westphal has a lot of power in this organization. And I don’t mean a lot in the way many coaches have a lot of power. I mean A LOT.
Evidence supporting said premise:
Wespthal’s voice was heard loud and clear as it pertained to this trade,
The implication in both Amick’s line and Westphal’s reaction is that Westphal specifically didn’t think Martin was working well with Tyreke Evans, and that Westphal endorsed switching it up.
And boom. Martin’s traded.
This is a club (the FO), one to which coaches had not previously been invited.
But here’s Westphal, being “heard loud and clear” as the team’s top veteran and one-time franchise face gets traded away, and a week later benching the team’s 21-year-old one-time Golden Boy center for fairly innocuous comments parrotted by teammates.
Conclusion and point of this anaylsis:
This is Paul Westphal the Decider. I’d advise you get used to him.
Look I read it the first time.
What’s your point?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I didn't say I agree with the analysis
I just wouldn’t call it so subjective to be completely invalid. It has a valid premise and is supported by stated facts to point to a conclusion. I can’t see why this seems so biased by subjectivity. I also think that is an unfair criticism and perhaps that worst one you can make to an author.
And I even think that the analysis isn’t broad enough and may even be wrong. I am not agreeing with it here. I think that the ownership and what they envision, as stated above, should be factored into this equation…
Okay fair enough.
What I disagree with is any analysis that says the Kings traded Martin because he didn’t work with Reke. As I’ve said several times, I don’t think Reke was the problem. It was everyone else.
I also think that is an unfair criticism and perhaps that worst one you can make to an author.
i can think of worse criticism’s actually. But, that’s not the point. I said I didn’t think the piece is objective. And that may be my subjective opinion. Who knows?
The idea that PW in a span of roughly 9 months gained more voice in the franchise decisions is a bit over the top for me. And, to that, I don’t see as objective. This was not a guy who was Paul Westphal’s first choice. Anyone wishes to argue that Rick Adelman didn’t have input in a deal of a magnitude like this, I think, is arguing the very short end of the stick. The relationship with the Maloof’s had frayed, but that doesn’t mean Petrie didn’t actually ask Rick Adelman what he thought. (And, why wouldn’t Petrie try to save his job when he knows the Maloof’s had had it with RA?)
And this argues back to a point that has gone back & forth around here for several years: Who has the power? I think, and nothing suggests to me that PW has any more power than he did when the Kings took Tyreke Evans, that Geoff Petrie is the top dog. The Maloof’s for their mistakes in the past (and there have been plenty) probably didn’t know about it until they heard it on SportsCenter or something. I doubt Petrie keeps them in the loop when doing trades until they are completed.
I get the Martin contingent, and I get why they’re pissed off. But anyone who wants to argue TZ isn’t part of that contingent is crazy. And no one can be completely objective if they have reason to be emotionally tied to something. (Which is true of everyone here.) If that is indeed the case, the problem wasn’t objectivity. It was my using the wrong word to describe what I see as the problem.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
So let me say this
I disagree with the summation of evidence used to support PW had more evidence compared to other head coaches (particularly Adelman).
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
had more power^
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Also consider this regarding Adelman
There are several coaches with 5+ years coaching on the Kings. Les Harrison is one (including the banner year in ’51), but that was so long ago and before the shot clock (not to mention 3 cities ago) that it may not count.
Bob Cousy came close, but got canned in his 5th season.
Cotton Fitzsimmons coached 6 full seasons in KC.
Garry St. Jean coached nearly 5 seasons, but that was because he was Jim Thomas’ guy and Mitch Richmond liked him.
Rick Adelman is the only other coach to have coached more than 5 seasons in the Sac Era, and, in franchise history, than any other coach for this franchise. That says something too about power. You don’t stick around if the players that are playing for you don’t buy into what you’re saying.
Anybody wishes to argue that Adelman didn’t have some level of power in what has been a dominant dysfunctional franchise throughout NBA history is fooling themselves.
(Here is where I got all the info from.)
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
good point
I always thought Adelman was in on those meetings, as well he should have, he was an excellent coach.
Adelman is just a damned fine coach
He doesn’t need power to stay around. Biggest mistake was letting him go. He was the reason we did so well. I mean to take it to LA in the playoffs for Houston with both McGrady and Ming out was just stellar.
The other talent on that team (including Landry) didn't hurt either.
That Rockets team was very talented.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
With all due respect your logic is flawed.
It has a valid premise and is supported by stated facts to point to a conclusion.
First off, it does not have a valid premise if we define the words “has a lot of power” to mean that he has the power to decide if a player is traded. There is nothing to indicate that he has that power. It would be better to use the work “influence.” The supporting evidence that you cite is merely Westphal voicing his opinion about Kevin. Therefore, the conclusion that he was the decider (of the trade) does not follow from the premise that he has a lot of power.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Saying it was not a sound argument is different
Analysis can bring in disperse and minor observations that can seem a reach. Those same pieces of information may not mean the same thing to somebody else with a different knowledge base, but it doesn’t necessarily mean it is biased.
My point wasn’t that it was the soundest argument around. Just that it didn’t seem so completely subjective and biased as it was made out to be, to the point of showing little ability to be objective or an incapability to be objective.
Maybe you can say the argument was not proven well enough for you, but that is different that saying it is all just biased and bogusly written due to subjectivity.
I meant is as I stated it.
It wasn’t that the argument was not proven well. It wasn’t. It was more that the argument was made to make Westphal look as though he was the one in power to trade Kevin, when there was no evidence to support that.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Ziller we all know you love to get things going and cause
Infighting here on the board!
Particularly politically!
PalinObamaLimbaughFranken FTW!!
Blessings.Love.Peace
by lifestyleforthesellout on Feb 24, 2010 2:44 PM PST up reply actions
Way to straddle the divide. :)
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
You know how I do. ;)
Blessings.Love.Peace
by lifestyleforthesellout on Feb 24, 2010 2:45 PM PST up reply actions
I surely do. Keep it up. :P
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Is that why your cooking is so uneven?
;-) for the humor impaired.
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." - Cardinal Richelieu
Interesting
It sounds like you are raising the bar to an impossible level – since when do we have to have “all” of the information necessary to voice an opinion?
We might as well stop discussing rotations, draft picks, trades, coaching changes…really, anything tangible pertaining to this franchise.
The analysis here was made with the relevant information at hand. Just as TZ has no way of knowing if PW talked separately to Spencer, there’s no way for you to know that he did indeed speak with Spencer.
Yet, your opinion is somehow strengthened by this lack of information, and TZ is stirring the pot.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
by otis29 on Feb 24, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly
This isn’t metaphysics – if all the evidence points in a certain direction, it’s probably true.
Especially when it’s difficult to imagine what he could have done to deserve a benching. What could he have done; peed in his Koolaid, called him a bad name? This is not a family, and PW is not his dad – if it’s not performance related, “grounding” him is a silly and unnecessary move.
Unless he’s trying out for Colbert’s “Alpha dog of the week”, that is.
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
may be cleaning house a little?
PW inherited a team that has pretty much sucked the last few years and except for the rookies, has the same team. To ask him to turn a bunch of players who were part of that suckass team into something better merely by some magic coaching wand is asking quite a bit.
Think Bill Parcells a little bit ago with the Dolphins who sucked for several years. He came, he saw, and cleaned house.
I think we are kidding ourselves to expect PW to take all the players and magically transform them into some sort of playoff bound team. So far he gotten Evans to play great, Omri has exceeded expectations, Beno is back, and Donte has show signs of life.
The thing that scares me more than anything else is this. If you took Evans off this team for the first 50 games, we could be hanging out with New Jersey.
Take those 4 players out of the equation and you are left with the players who played suckass basketball for the last few years who got blown out after blow out not just on the road, but on their home floor. Maybe some pride needs to be instilled, because we have not seen it the last few years. I have no problem with PW cleaning up and having some power. If Spence would have opened up his mouth the last few years (and I have said this is more to the story just like there was more to the story with Martin and his agent and missing pregame shootarounds), I don’t believe Reggie, Natt, or Muss would have had the balls to do something about it.
I am glad PW took a stand.
by noreboundsnorings on Feb 24, 2010 12:03 PM PST reply actions
One piece of analysis missing
The team is awful right now, and has regressed substantially as the season has gone on. They are lifeless, there is bickering – and whether you think what he did with Spencer was the correct call or not – there were three players quoted in that Bee article (including our superstar), so Spencer’s not the only one with the problem.
Sorry, this may indeed blow over, but you’re trying to put a bow on top of a lump of crap and call it a birthday present.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
by otis29 on Feb 24, 2010 12:07 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I think PW wanted to make a point
And he can’t say anything against Tyreke, Sean doesnt matter, and Spence doesnt have enough of a following for there to be a huge backlash, so he chose the easiest route to punish someone.
by MichaelMack on Feb 24, 2010 12:17 PM PST up reply actions
PW WON'T say anything against Tyreke...
That is the big difference… he could if he wanted too…
Hard work beats talent when talent is hardly working...
If he's trying to make a point
and doesn’t “punish” consistently – then he will earn nothing but disrespect.
Further, what the hell would his point be – that everyone – except for those that really suck or are really good – have to listen to me? That’s laughable.
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
PW continued
If there is one thing I can count on it is Otis disagreeing with me. Granted there were a few other players who made statements too. However, if Spence has done other things that we do not know about and I gotta believe he has, PW may have felt that Spence has gotten enough rope and his statement was the last straw and he needed to be disciplined. I have never seen May or Evans make any comments in the paper or have had any strained relationship problems with Kings management. Spence has had 2 that we know of. The conditioning test and skipping summer league and those are just the 2 we know of.
For any us to think we have all the facts, you are kidding yourselves.
Have have a co-worker get fired and wonder why they got fired. It is only a matter of time before all the real details come out and how often we say I never knew about that. But management did.
by noreboundsnorings on Feb 24, 2010 12:43 PM PST up reply actions
I'd like to agree wholeheartedly nrnr
because giving the benefit of the doubt to the head coach over the 21 year old we know is capable of saying something stupid makes a lot of sense.
My only concern is the manner in which PW has gone about his business in this. He’s deliberately been as abrasive, condescending and dare I say immature as possible. He didn’t give Hawes a dnp-cd; he didn’t let him dress, and then was as insulting as possible within the bounds of his position in his comment to the press about it.
Even if Hawes deserved to be benched a game, what is the point in going about it in the manner that he did? That’s the main reason I have a tough time just giving PW the benefit of the doubt.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
If there is good reason to do something
the perpetrators generally have no issue being open about it. Westphaul has been anything but.
Using your co-worker example, If someone gets fired for stealing the copy machine, you’re going to hear about it. However, if someone gets fired for banging his boss’s wife, probably not.
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
At least from the boss, that is.
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
Again, as I responded upthread a bit to someone else
You are using the lack of information to strengthen your argument, but implying that the same lack of information is hurting my argument. That doesn’t make a lot of sense.
What I do know from watching this team is that Spencer is clearly not the sole problem, just as Kevin was not the sole problem. The Sacramento Kings, as a whole, are regressing, and there is some dissension in the locker room. Three players were quoted in the Bee article, Spencer being one of them.
I’m not a Spencer Hawes fan, to be honest (primarily over the conditioning and summer league issues you noted). And I do like Coach Westphal for the most part, and hope he’s able to get things heading back in the right direction.
But you put all these facts together, and it’s hard to say that PW’s doing a great job at the moment.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I agree with this
Kevin wasn’t the sole problem, but I think the conclusion GP & Co. came to was that Kevin wasn’t going to be the answer for the KINGS.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
That seemed to be a popular thing to do here just a few weeks ago.
Sorry, this may indeed blow over, but you’re trying to put a bow on top of a lump of crap and call it a birthday present.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 24, 2010 6:12 PM PST up reply actions
Well, he should DECIDE to run offensive plays
Seriously. How many times do we see Tyreke walk (not jog or trot) up the ball from the in-bounds pass? (No, seriously, I wish there was a stat for that so I could really see). He comes awfully close to getting 8-second half-court violations. Which leads to…
Why do we keep running isolation plays? I understand we have a few new guys but I’m sure most guys know how to run off a pick-and-roll (and by that I mean, just don’t stand around while the C/PF and PG/NaPG runs the play).
With those isolation plays, by the time the ball-handler is ready to attempt a shot (usually at the sub-10-second mark of the shot clock), the defense collapses and the play is either stuffed or the ball is passed to an outside shooter who needs to quickly put up a shot. Why don’t we either initiate closer to the 15-second mark in these cases? Or push the ball up the floor? I’m not advocating for 7SoL here, but we do tend to play better at a quicker pace.
Thanks, PW, for givng me an opportunity to gripe. Anyway, I’m sure everyone will move on and the team will improve with time…I hope.
What is it they say, the first stage is "denial", then comes "bargaining"?
I think TZ is in the “bargaining” stage on the trade of KMart, and specifically, “Does this mean I have a real rift with GP and the organization, or maybe my problem is just with expendable here today gone tomorrow PW?”
I think GP has been disappointed with KMart’s toughness and leadership since the EMuss days. I don’t think there was any overnight prodding by PW that made GP see KMart in a different light.
Is KMart no better than a bench scorer? I think we hoped he’d be the next Rip Hamilton, but I don’t think anyone still thinks he can be as good defensively (or as durable) as Rip, and so what does that leave you? In Vinnie Johnson, Jamal Crawford territory?
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
it seems very obvious
from everything that has come out since the trade that Martin and Westphal were not compatible.
We’ll see what Houston makes of Martin, if he can’t succeed there, I have a tough time picturing where he will.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
I don't know if this is true or not. (About the compatability.) However, I see why people say that.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I think
you’re stretching. I laid out some evidence Westphal was both down on Martin and had a voice in the trade proceedings, which is rare for Petrie. So that leads to the fairly obvious conclusion that Westphal has quite a bit more power than we previously assumed.
What powers did he have that he didnt in June?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
does he have now^
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Aye Carumba
What powers does PW have now that he didn’t have in June?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Paul Westphal
has gained X-Ray Vision and Super Smelling since June.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
by Xiane on Feb 24, 2010 10:49 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Hey, that's it...
Spencer just really stinks.
by Mityt on Feb 25, 2010 11:53 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Maybe I have rose coloured glasses
Of late the team is not playing well and seems to be making the same mistakes over and over again. The Pistons running the same plays over and over again and scoring, the Kings not moving the ball on offense, it would be nice if the ball made to both sides of the court before a shot gets tossed up and the miss gets outletted for a layup at the other end. Popovich used to pull Parker on occasion when he would make mistakes then put him back in, I don’t see this with Evans
Donte Greene has made some meaningful strides this year, by all means take the open three and cut to the basket, and look for offensive rebounds but that does not mean I want him trying to take guys off the dribble.
I would think younger players need structure and need to learn their roles and as they master those give them more, with the minutes some guys get it seems the opposite is happening.
Did anyone else listen to the Bill Simmons podcast with Daryl Morey, you find it on ESPN.com or at I Tunes, I found it to be pretty interesting, Simmons point was that K Mart was similar in type to Reggie Miller, a guy who needed to be used in a certain way, ie run off picks needs plays to be run for him. I’m not saying he is in Millers class but I don’t think he was used very well this year. I think Morey is a smart guy, look at the Houston this year and the talent they have and look how well they are doing. Time will tell who he does in Houston
Reggie Miller is a better goal for KMart
That’s a good point. Of course, Reggie was very tough mentally, a vocal leader, and killer in the clutch.
With that said, I hope KMart finds the right situation in Houston and kicks ass. Time will tell.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
Reggie Miller also never played with a ball dominant G whose main focus was scoring either.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
in addition
Paul Westphal has shown no interest in running an offense designed to use a shooter ala Martin, Reggie Miller or Rip Hamilton, which is really a fundamental reason why Martin is gone.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
As good a reason as any.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Which begs the question of why not?
Paul Westphal has shown no interest in running an offense designed to use a shooter ala Martin
Most everyone here has stressed the need for patience in rebuilding and player development, which I can see. Why then was the FO so impatient in dealing with Martin?
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
Because I think they felt the rest of the team suffered at the hands of getting Martin in the flow. In turn that made the team worse.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
If that is the reason
then there are some dumb people running our team. Martin didn’t need to be the focal point of the offense. Would it really have been that hard to draw up a few O sets for Martin? I think not, nor would that have been disruptive to the rest of the team.
At this point I don’t understand what the FO is doing…(…they may have some master plan, but I’m apparently too dumb to understand what it is!)
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
Kevin seemed to think differently.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Exactly
If we look at a timeline of the events that transpired, Martin ends up looking like a douchebag.
1. Tyreke Evans is obviously a ball-dominant player.
2. Martin says he really wants Tyreke Evans in the draft.
3. Martin and Evans play five games together. Evans does nothing, Martin does well and then hurts himself.
4. Evans goes crazy as the #1 option with Martin out.
5. Martin returns from his injury, is rusty, and isn’t making shots. Evans continues to be Evans.
6. Martin starts to complain about his role on the team, which he SHOULD’VE SEEN COMING given Evans’ game.
7. Martin gets to the point where he wants out, and plays like it.
8. Martin gets traded.
9. …
10. Profit!
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 4:36 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Maybe Kevin didn't like being one of the oldest players on the team,
playing second fiddle to one of the youngest players on the team. Going from being the best player on the team to being second best to a younger guy may have been hard for him to swallow.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Then why would he publically say he wanted Evans?
He should’ve said he wanted Rubio. Hell, it would’ve made more sense given that they have the same agent. He wanted Evans, then selfishly realized he’d have to take a backseat to Evans. That’s just immature. Martin, IMO, didn’t treat the whole situation very maturely.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 4:47 PM PST up reply actions
I don't get this at all
He never varied from his I want Evans statement. This really seems off-base and about what his agent said. Not what Kevin Martin said.
I'm confused as to what you're saying
Sentence 1: Martin never varied from his “I want Evans” statement. I agree with this.
Sentence 2: Huh? I came up with the Rubio thing on my own. If Martin had looked at Evans at all he would’ve realized he was a ball-dominant guard. Either Martin misjudged his ability to play with a ball-dominant guard, or he just flat-out thought it didn’t make a difference. Either way, he whiffed in his analysis.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:26 PM PST up reply actions
Or
he assumed Westphal would run an offense similar to what they’d run in previous year, not “give the ball to Tyreke and the rest of you stand as far away from the basket and each other as possible to space the floor.”
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
by Grasul on Feb 24, 2010 5:28 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
You are making some assumptions here, #6-7
Was it really Martin complaining about his role on the team. I never heard that. It also goes against everything I have heard about him. What I heard was that he seemed to feel like they weren’t planning on integrating him into the team. That is different.
And he played like it? The dude was coming back after an injury. I doubt he intentionally play bad. If that is what you are saying, and it seems like it, then that is just crap.
How many games does he get to play like he should, then?
Is there an arbitrary number that fits there? Does he gets 13 games, but 14 is too many? I think it was clear that the reason he wasn’t fitting in was because he wanted the other players to shape their games to his instead of vice-versa. He tried passing more and shooting less early on, didn’t like it, and turned the offense into a two-Alpha Dog offense. Either the play was going to Martin, or it was going to Evans. They didn’t really ever click together.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:24 PM PST up reply actions
And this addresses my points how?
You still don’t say where you heard that Martin complained about his role. I guess my point was made there.
How do you equate he was passing more and then turn around to say he turned it into a two-Alpha Dog offense in the same sentence. You are negating and contradicting your own self.
And, this wasn’t given time, the backcourt of these two players, and in the limited minutes we started to see some passing out from Evans to Martin. Barely happened at all and not enough to evaluate..
I don’t see how you can blame Martin here, but you seem bound on making this all about him and laying all the blame at his feet.
this is what puzles me about the whole thing
And, this wasn’t given time, the backcourt of these two players, and in the limited minutes we started to see some passing out from Evans to Martin. Barely happened at all and not enough to evaluate..
Exactly. And if offensive compatibility does become an issue, then at least see if you can adjust the scheme before getting rid of one of the components. Seems like the backcourt of Evans/Martin was never really given a chance to succeed.
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
...
How do you equate he was passing more and then turn around to say he turned it into a two-Alpha Dog offense in the same sentence. You are negating and contradicting your own self.
Did you not follow my sentence? I’ll walk you through it…
1. “He tried passing more and shooting less early on,” – Makes sense
2. “DIDN’T LIKE IT,” – He wasn’t happy with his role
3. “and turned the offense into a two-Alpha Dog offense.” – Still makes sense.
Martin complained about his role in our offense in the media after the trade. Did he complain during the season? Maybe. Maybe not. Sorry if I didn’t make that clear. I guess I whiffed that part.
The main problem here is the the reasons Kevin Martin was unhappy in Sacramento were all selfish reasons. He wasn’t as big a part of the offense as he’d have liked to be. He wasn’t “the man” anymore. Etc. The only thing I’m doing in this piece of this topic is agreeing with pookey that Martin seemed to think differently than the common refrain around here of “Martin didn’t need to be the focal point”. Martin seemed to think differently.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 6:47 PM PST up reply actions
Is this all just your opinion?
You are basically holding him to blame for way too much. For instance, Martin isn’t the PG or the coach so how does he turn the offense into anything?
3. "and turned the offense into a two-Alpha Dog offense." – Still makes sense.
How does this make sense? What is your basis for making this statement? Is it just your opinion or something because the facts don’t support this at all.
Here are the average number of shots taken for that last five games Martin played:
Tyreke Evans: 13.8 shots
Kevin Martin: 13 shots
Jason Thompson: 11.2 shots
Omri Casspi: 10.4 shots
I don’t even get what you are saying at all because JT and Casspi were shooting almost as much. If it was really just a two dog show wouldn’t their numbers be down? What the hell are you talking about?
And as to the rest of your points
I really think that this “he wasn’t the man” crap is reading way to much into it. It could just as easily be taken as he didn’t like it that management wasn’t making him part of the plan for the team’s future.
Whatever, read into it what you want. I just think that has more to do with your own internal assumptions. I just don’t get and don’t buy it.
thank you Mustang
I find it odd how many people project their own feelings onto the players, using phrases like “the man”. Personally, I dont think players spend a lot of time thinking about things like that, they probably laugh at how the agitators on sites like ESPN come up with story lines and narratives, and I think we read those and parrot the same things in conversation and sites such as this.
by MichaelMack on Feb 24, 2010 11:03 PM PST up reply actions
I don't dislike Martin
You can’t pretend like Martin was enthusiastic about being a King in the last few games he played for the team unless you didn’t watch the games.
You guys are nitpicking the timeline I made. The main point was the fact that Martin vocalized his support for Evans before the draft, then changed his mind and couldn’t figure out how to play with him.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 25, 2010 12:29 PM PST up reply actions
I think its more correct to say
Martin later decided Paul Westphal didn’t want him on the team than he didn’t want to play with Evans.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Well, now we're guessing
I got the feeling that Martin didn’t think he could play with Evans, but it’s just a feeling. All I wanted to emphasize is that he said he wanted Evans, got Evans, and couldn’t figure out how to play with Evans. Those things together struck me as kind of weak, since by vocalizing support for Evans, Martin had to know what kind of player they were getting. Maybe I’m wrong. That’s really all I was trying to highlight.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 25, 2010 12:41 PM PST up reply actions
I'm not really guessing
I’m running with what Westphal has said about it (which admittedly you have to read into) and what David Thrope said, which is pretty black and white.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Fair enough
Kevin Martin was never my favorite player, but I still liked him a lot. He just never seemed like the kind of guy that could carry a team. I don’t have a grudge against Martin or anything.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 25, 2010 12:47 PM PST up reply actions
Can we agree to give him the benefit of the doubt
I think that is fair. I also think that Martin is not a liar. When he says something I just can’t immediately disregard it. He has dodged plenty of questions from media and when he doesn’t want to answer he doesn’t.
I don’t know if you heard his interview on Koz’s show where he said good-bye. I am paraphrasing here. He said that one of the things he regretted was not having more time on the floor with Evans. He came across as genuinely regretting not giving the pairing a chance.
I think that given his explicit support of this pick and that every statement about Evans and him has been positive it is unfair to say he had any of feeling.
Grasul is absolutely correct. Every account I have heard, second hand, is that Martin felt the team (not Evans) didn’t have long-term plans for him. There has never been a statement or any indirect reference that I know of in which Martin implied any kind of negativity about Evans or their pairing.
His agent and others have made some comments, but even these were aimed at the Kings and not Evans.
I think my reply to you
was taken more as more contrary than I meant, when I meant to highlight how often we project feelings, when my gut instinct is the players are probably more business like than all the silly stories generated by online sources. I do agree with Grasul, in that I would think Kevin’s feelings of not fitting in were a direct result of the coaching staff than anything else.
Maybe they were scared of wasting their effort designing the gameplans for a guy who's injured so often
Jus’ sayin’.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 24, 2010 2:45 PM PST up reply actions
My humble opinion
“catering to Martin” means a huge amount of committment. Its not just running a few plays, its a style of play, a motion, passing type offense, and that just doesn’t seem to be anything Westphal is interested in running to me.
If Paul Westphal is the coach and you like him, and he doesn’t think Martin fits well with his scheme, what else can you do? This begs the question though, why didn’t they know this before he was hired? Part of the hiring process for head coach isn’t a discussion on style of play? That’s hard to believe honestly.
You know what would be really, really interesting is having an hour to discuss all things Kings with Coachie; that would be a priceless opportunity. I wonder if Westphal is taking the team in a direction that makes Coachie less interested in being a part of the organization, and he’s going to quietly retire at the end of the year.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
by Grasul on Feb 24, 2010 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I think that's partly it too Gras
The style fit Tyreke, and the other guys around Reke, but not Kevin. Well said.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
We have a style?
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Feb 24, 2010 4:05 PM PST up reply actions
So what's the upside?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
We don't have Corey Maggette
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 4:36 PM PST up reply actions
Damn.
I’m so prepared to fell awful about that too!
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
There are more upsides
We don’t have Monta Ellis
We don’t have a mascot that looks like The Tick
We don’t have Don Nelson’s sweaty ass leaving cheek marks on our scorer’s table
We are allowed to have players over 6’ 6"
Downside:
We don’t have Stephen Curry
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 4:42 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I hear what you're saying
But I don’t think a style of offense/offensive philosophy and a few set plays have to be mutually inclusive. It would be helpful if they were, but I don’t think that’s a requirement. Plus, I don’t think it would’ve been a case of here’s our philosophy, but to incorporate Kevin we’re going in a completely different direction, if only for a few plays.
As for Westphal, shouldn’t he have developed a scheme that maximized the pieces/talent he had, vs. having an a preconceived scheme that apparently does not (or at least is very very slow in adapting)? And you’re right- you think that would’ve been discussed in the hiring process.
Poor Coachie. I often wonder if he looks up at the rafters and wonders what the hell he’s doing here! We’re obviously not running in semblance of the Princeton, so what’s he doing with his time (and I don’t mean that as a knock on him)?
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
Rick Adelman didn't really run the Princeton either.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
So what does he do with his time?
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
Sleep.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
and get paid for it!
where do i sign up?
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
Adelman only sleeps when bears sleep.
He tries to hibernate through the winter – aka the longeurs of the NBA season. Soon the ice will crack, somewhere where they still have ice, and Rick will wake and begin coaching.
You can be sure he wasn’t pleased at 4 new cubs delivered to his cave, and one of his favorites gone.
Also, though, I would say that Adelman really does try to adapt his offense and defense to the talent on hand. I understand getting players that fit a system, but making no effort to accommodate talent into a given system seems foolish to me.
By the way, I’d imagine most people would think that Joe Johnson is a better player than Martin. I decided to look at Johnson and Martin on a “win shares per game” basis for their careers (not including this year). Martin gets .195 WS per game for his career. Johnson gets .073. There are flaws to this approach, and you may not like Win Shares, but it’s interesting, I think. Carl Landry averages .094 not including this year.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
Martin is actually .095 WS per game - sorry about the stray .1
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
Interesting Quote from Sean May at the end of that Jones Piece
“I didn’t mean anything by it,” said May, who spoke with his coach about it. “Coach has an open-door policy, and everybody knows that.”
Looks like May was clearly contrite and apologetic therefore didn’t get the benching, maybe Spencer wasn’t as forthcoming.
I think the missing piece of the analysis is...
…Spencer is an immature douchebag. And nobody likes an immature douchebag.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
I see where Grasul called PW "immature" above
and I can see the point, but to me PW’s “snark” was pretty typical Phil Jackson type quip material. Coaches get pissed off at guys, and can make quips. Phil Jackson did much the same thing with —damn what’s that 6’10" Euro dude who hurt himself snowboarding? Radmanovic? yeah, Jackson rode him in the LA Times for weeks with snark like this. I don’t think it’s a great sin on PW’s part.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
I can see that I suppose
I’ll try not to make the obligatory comparison between Jackson’s resume and Westphal’s.
And regardless of whether or not Spencer is an “immature douchebag” its good coaching to deactivate him for a game because of it?
I’d just like to see PW’s approach be different than it was in this case, and I am a little worried with the issues out there now. This really seems fixable with everyone close to the team working at it, definitely including Spencer, and I hope they all get there.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
You make good points
For me, this, like all things in life, comes back to “The Sound of Music.” Specifically, “What do you do with a problem like Maria?”
How do you motivate Spencer? Do you try to break his prima donna act and humble him so that he works harder on his game? So that he becomes a bit more coachable? I don’t know. I think figuring out how to motivate Spencer is a tough one.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
Prima Donna act?
Where does this come from? What has Spencer done that makes you label him as not humble and coachable?
StR Token Female
by LeaguePassAddict on Feb 24, 2010 1:22 PM PST up reply actions
serious?
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
sure, its a mantra but
where are the specific examples? i’’m not saying there aren’’t any — i’m just saying that its been repeated so many times that its taken on a life of its own and become exaggerated
by lchristmas on Feb 24, 2010 1:29 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Yeah are you serious?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
As a heart attack.
I know he’s a little mouthy, but where have you ever read or heard anything he said that leads you to believe he’s not coachable, or that he is a prima donna?
Because I haven’t heard anything. Not that warrants being labled as uncoachable.
StR Token Female
by LeaguePassAddict on Feb 24, 2010 2:50 PM PST up reply actions
Plenty of things actually.
I let it go because he’s 21. But there are plenty of things that worry about JT’s ability to take criticism, and Omri too. It’s not just Spence. It’s part of the NBA.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
You mean besides
not going to a conditioning camp, not showing up to summer league in shape (or at all), not meeting with the coach or coaching staff at all during the offseason to understand the offense or defense, making statements to the press without running them by the coach first, or were there other things you hadn’t heard? That said Spencer is hardly the only one who likes to throw a little pity party at the age of 21, Omri, JT, Donte, even the savior, they’ve all had some sulks here and there.
immature douchebag
If he can play people people will get over it, look at Giants fans and Barry Bonds
Exactly
Bow down to Big Daddy Coach or else you get a spankin’.
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
The way I see it
Spencer has read his own press clippings and thinks he is performing at a level greater than he is. Spencer can be a very good high post center as soon as he accepts he has a lot to learn, and be willing to work hard at improvinh his weaknesses. I am confident that he could become an excellent compliment to Reke and Landry, average 12-15 with 7-8 boards and 3-5 assists. But he will never get there until he grows up and accepts that he has a lot of work to do!
I think this is the proverbial swat to the nose or timeout, and is the right move
"If my aunt had a set of nuts, she'd be my uncle"
by want2win on Feb 24, 2010 12:52 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Then why not swat everyone who "mouthed off"?
You can’t play favorites. You can’t punish one and not the others.
What Westphal did is lose a measure of respect from every player on that team, and possibly instill a little fear.
And I found it ironic that he punished Spencer for talking to the press about in-house issues, then did the same thing. AND when asked if Spencer had learned his lesson, Westphal said, “You’ll have to ask him.”
Right. If I’m Spencer, I’m totally going to answer that question and be quoted in the newspaper again. (That was sarcasm, just so you know.)
StR Token Female
by LeaguePassAddict on Feb 24, 2010 1:21 PM PST up reply actions
Uhmm
You can play favorites if it is somebody that you want to get rid of and not have around anymore. This makes perfect sense if Spencer is on the chopping block. After the media treatment of Martin anyway. I expect to hear that Grant Napear is going off at Spencer next.
Let me rephrase.
You can’t play favorites and expect people to respect you.
StR Token Female
by LeaguePassAddict on Feb 24, 2010 1:38 PM PST up reply actions
I think the fact that he said you'll have to ask him
was kinda the point.
I agree to a certain extent
You should never play favorites, but it is hard not to favor those that bring the right attitude and work ethic. What my point did not clearly state is this; regardless of the benching I think Spencer is a little too full of himself, I think he has huge upside but will never realize it if he does not admit he needs to improve and make the effort to do so.
"If my aunt had a set of nuts, she'd be my uncle"
Behind the Scenes
We don’t know what private conversations the players had with Westphal about this before the game. Maybe Tyreke and May apologized and explained their case in a respectful way and Spencer instead had a heated and confrontational conversation with the coach. I don’t think Westphal would only pick on Hawes for no reason.
Kings rule! (They are royalty - right?)
i sincerely doubt
that “tywreck” apologized or would be expected to apologize for anything
he is the savior of this franchise
by lchristmas on Feb 24, 2010 1:30 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
We don't know
But we do know that PW used the media to relay what appeared to be kind of a shitty message. And he appeared to take some enjoyment in it.
I said it before and I’ll say it again:
Be the adult, not the child.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Unless i saw him say it I don't know about the enjoyment.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Isn't it obvious who is REALLY pulling the strings here?!?
It’s not the Maloofs, Petrie or even PW… Think about it.
Crazy?!? (like a fox)
Sound the trumpets, Raise the drawbridge, and drop the Oldsmobile
Coachie is Kaiser Sosay!!!!
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 24, 2010 2:51 PM PST up reply actions
Kaizer Soze is awesome! His cane was totally righteous!
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
This has become a question of who handled the situation badly, Spencer or PW?
Isn’t the real question," Is Westphal’s rotations and lack of consistent minutes hurting the young players and the team?" Some of the players think so, why doesn’t Westphal?
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
May hasn't played much
Reke could be complaining for others, and Spence has his own reasons.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
This wasn't Reke's first negative comment.
He’s complained before about people being out of position and ruining the play. He’s has vocal arguements with players on the court, Noc and Beno if I remember correctly. And, after this last game he also said he could have gotten 20 assists. (implying someone didn’t make shots and cost him assists). I am afraid that this is the tip of the iceberg.
Most of these guy went through this last year (17 wins), but we have 25 games left and Tyreke is already saying that he’s looking forward to the season ending. Imagine how Hawes, JT, Cisco, Noc, and Beno feel.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
Amick was on 1140 earlier
and said that Evans comments about getting 20 assists weren’t serious; he said it in a joking around way. The other stuff I havn’t really noticed and will try to watch for on the court.
I wasn't being serious either
In an other post I said something like PW needs to nip this in the bud too. I didn’t make my point here very well.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
So, if Paul had a voice in making the Martin decision, where does that leave Spencer?
I have a feeling Spencer might be moved this summer. Maybe we can get some good value for him.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
That might be the best thing for Spencer.
I’ve said several times that Spencer and JT would have had a better chance to develop with a better team, that was more stable, and allowed them to have better players around them.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
What better players that the Kings have had that would allow JT & Shawes to develop?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Not sure about your meaning, so I'll explain mine.
If Spencer were on the Pistons, when he came into the game for Wallace, he’d be in a more stable invironment because the players around him would be GOOD veterans that Knew their assignments and performed them well.
On the Kings Spencer has rookies and 1st year players all around him. And, those players are constantly blowing their defensive assignments, And the offense is so hap hazard who knows when someone is going to put up a shot.
I think you can learn your assignment better, when the players around you know theirs.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
by HighTops on Feb 24, 2010 2:23 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
You mean players develop better when veterans are still playing in front of them?
Seems counterintutive, because the whole point of a rebuild is to stockpile young talent and ship out the veteran dead wood.
No you misunderstood me.
It has nothing to do with who you play behind, but who you play with.
Let say Hawes got drafted as a backup center for Utah. When he came in for Okur, he’d be playing along side top pros like Kirilenko, Boozer, and Millsap. Guys who know their job and don’t need Spencer’s help to defend their man. Spencer than only has to worry about doing and learning to play his position.
There are too many breakdowns on the Kings defense. Players have to help others too often, and the defense ends up being too helter skelter. Rotations get screwed up, and assignments get confused. No one learns quickly or easily in an unstable environment.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
chapu would develop JT & Hawes in his spare time
the time he doesn’t spend feeding the orphans and clothing the homeless, anyway. /pre-emptive chapuforyou strike
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 2:24 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
As I said in another thread if I were Spencer I’d be working with my agent on an exit strategy ASAP.
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." - Cardinal Richelieu
That's weak, man.
You’re just gonna run from your problems? Most players on most teams would be punished for making comments that question the coach’s moves. It’s that simple. When I read the article the first time, I thought, “wow. This isn’t good. The players are talking negatively to the media about their coach’s rotation.” I expected some sort of fallout.
Spencer tends to be bitchy and he got what he deserved.
"If you told him to head-butt the wall, he would do it." -- Paul Westphal re: Brockness Monster.
by PhutureKings on Feb 25, 2010 10:18 AM PST up reply actions
Haha
actually most players on the Kings don’t “get punished for making comments that question the coach’s motives.”
Only one does.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Yeah not really.
The context of what Reke & Spence said was different. I think you have to grant that.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
This argument
Is splitting hairs a bit IMO. Both are voicing issues with the head coach’s rotation/minute allocation. And both did so to the media. Whether Reke was being a good leader of men and backing up his teammates, he was still questioning the coach.
Plus, I’ve read the comments plenty of times now – Reke’s criticism is much harsher than May or Hawes.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
When you're a franchise player you need to criticize your coach somewhat.
I think Reke will get better at that though. And let’s make that clear: Reke got away with this because he’s a franchise player. Spence is not.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I don't disagree with this
In turn, I’d say that if your franchise player and two other players are saying the same thing in the same article…you might not want to isolate one of them for a more excessive punishment than the others.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
And what happened?
May apologized and Spence did not. That was the problem.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
That was the problem according to PW
We don’t really know what happened. My money is still on the emotional stress he’s under due to his wife’s situation. But that’s still just a guess. Hopefully the whole blows over and things get back on track.
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." - Cardinal Richelieu
Reke is still a rookie and is still learning about dealing with media.
Coach cut him some slack for that reason.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Yes pookey what they said is different
but its not different in the context of what PW said he punished Spencer for. He said he punished Spencer for compaining about the coaches rotations, which is his prerogative to control. My point is, given what PW said the problem was, what Tyreke said was as bad or worse as what Spencer said.
If you’re willing to say Tyreke got treated differently because he’s the franchise guy (which you did below), then I have no problem, that’s my point.
Paul Westphal was disingenuous when he said Tyreke wasn’t punished because what he said was different; Tyreke wasn’t punished because he’s more important to the Kings than Westphal is, its that simple.
So at that point, we can see how stupid a move it was for Westphal to go this direction. He’s announced to the world that he’s not willing to exercise any control over Tyreke and demonstrated exactly where his authority ends. Not a good move from an otherwise very bright guy.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
What Spencer was said to be punished for
And what he was actually punished for are two different things.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I agree with this also
:-)
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Well okay.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I am coming to agree with this more and more
PW stated that he didn’t know his role. Spencer’s comments did not address… ‘role’. Seems like there has to be something else not being said.
Bingo.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
This was all about a message to Spencer. Not about making consistent rules in public. PW is smart enough to know that fans will recognize how he contradicted himself.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
This was also a message to the team
I am really curious about just what “role” Spencer took that was so offensive…
Whatever it is doesn't make a difference. It's interesting to see how this all transpires in the future.
Flare-up’s do happen with losing teams. In a lot of places, this would have been a lot worse. This is one area where having such a lightweight media is an advantage.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
You don't have an open door policy,
when you make an example of one individual, to shut up the rest of the team. Whether there were other issues involved makes not difference.
Tyreke said he heard it from other players. Tyreke’s closest friends are Donte & JT. May said JT and Spencer felt that way. Donte’s been the one who has seen, the issue the most. The great Kobe defender one day, 4 mins. against Utah the next. The Problem is real. The Players are saying it’s affecting them. All Westphal accomplished by punishing Spencer, is close the open door.
The players still think there’s a problem. And, until that is addressed by the coaching staff, nothing has changed. Except none of the players are going into the coaches office and talk to him about what’s making them unhappy.
And, when Tyreke gets unhappy, Westphal is gone.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
You've made your feelings known. I've made my known.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I suppose my issue is
And I think I am closer in thought to Grasul and HT than you are others on this board Pookey, is that this flare up and public spanking of Spencer is indicative of far greater problems with how the team is being coached, and how the orginization is being run.
Yes you have, and they've been well thought out
I’ve been in management, and I’ve seen employees turn on managers when they thought that their issues were being ignored or discounted. The decline happens quickly, and is almost never reversible. And, just like in professional sports, upper management always sees removing the manager as the easiest and quickest way to resolve the problem.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
The NBA is not the same as the big B as you refer to HT. I feel where you're coming from because I've worked for a big corportation too (or several) as a very low level employee.
But, on the flip side, the NBA is not like those companies. It happens in a very public specter and what not. Companies do not normally operate that way, and I’m not sure any would survive if they did.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I respectfully disagree with you about the open door policy.
Disciplining one person doesn’t destroy the open door policy. The players knew there was some friction between Westphal and Spencer, before this incident. They are savvy enough to see the disciplining of Spencer, as a consequence of a series of issues between Spencer and Westphal. I do not believe it is going to change the relationship the players have with their coach. The one thing that they will take from this is avoid talking about problems with the media. If anything, it placed greater emphasis on the open door policy. Each player knows, if he has a problem, talk to coaching staff about it.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Since when is planning for your future the same thing as running from your problems?
Get real. If your boss doesn’t like you, how raises and promotions do you think you’re going to get in that situation? So according to you people should be stuck in dead end situations because if they don’t stay they’d be running from their problems.
You must be the kind of guy that would look at the people jumping into lifeboats on the Titanic and quip “Look at those losers! Running from their problems won’t get them anywhere.”
Spencer looks to be on the same train as Martin. The smart thing to do would be to face that possibility head on and start making plans in the event that possibility becomes reality.
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." - Cardinal Richelieu
I read things differently.
I don’t see that Hawes bosses don’t like him. I see them thinking that Spencer could be a worthwhile member of the team, but that he has some attitude problems which need correcting. I don’t think that Hawes was punished solely for the Bee incident. It was just the straw that broke the camel’s back. If Spencer doesn’t get the message from the discipline he has been given and change his behavior, then I think he could be on the same train as Martin. I don’t see that as the case right now.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
From outside looking in it looks like it could go either way
But, if I’d been on my bosses shit list for as long as Spencer has (i.e. ever since Summer League) I’d consider that a red flag. At that point I’d be evaluating my options and planning ahead for either possibility. Obviously the smart thing to do is to do what you can to get off that shit list. But if you can’t, and Spencer hasn’t accomplished that to date, the smart thing to do is figure out ahead of time how you’re going to respond.
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." - Cardinal Richelieu
I agree with you on this point:
Obviously the smart thing to do is to do what you can to get off that shit list.
I think this may be the most important factor in the whole thing between Spencer and Westphal. Spencer has been on Westphal’s shit list and it is incumbent upon him to get himself off of it. Speaking to the media did not impress Westphal that he has been making efforts to correct his ways. Spencer just doesn’t get it. This is Westphal’s way of trying to get Spencer’s attention.
If Spencer chooses not to pay attention, then he better start making plans to leave. Coaches do not like to work with players who are hard to coach, refuse to listen, argue, and do not follow the rules. However, if he leaves without learning the lesson which was presented to him, then he will probably make the same kind of mistake with future teams. Spencer has an opportunity to change and grow into a better teammate, player, and person. The ball is in his court.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
And sometimes your boss just really doesn't like you
it happens regardless of your intentions or what you do about it.
PW’s actions this year certainly could give the impression he’d rather not have Hawes on the team. That doesn’t mean that’s what he thinks, but it is definitely plausible given what we know.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
True - sometimes your boss really doesn't like you or
you decide that you can’t stand your boss.
Whatever they may have felt about each other before this incident, their feelings may have changed with how this thing has been blown out of proportion. I am not sure how I would feel, if I were in either one of their shoes.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Hozr...You're a Douche.
Honestly, your argument is weak and your assumptions about me just make it seem like you took things personally. Which, I really don’t care if you did, but at the same time, I’m going to have to set the record straight.
First of all, Hawes is an NBA player, not Joe Six-pack. He does not have to deal with the same BS regarding raises and promotions as we do. He simply has to work hard, respect the team dynamic and rake in the cash.
I never stated people should be stuck in a dead end situation. Never. Hawes’ situation is far from dead end. All he has to do is learn how to appropriately address the media and mature a little bit. He would have the same problem he had here on any other team, so it makes little sense to me to request a trade just because he got benched for a game or two. That is what I meant by running from your problems. You can either learn your lesson from the situation, or you can run to a new situation and experience the same results as a consequence of not addressing the real issue. Do you see the difference?
You have no idea what kind of guy I am. It is purely asinine to assume anything about me. Based on your response, however, I feel safe in concluding that you’re a douche. Not to mention, I think everyone will agree that being benched for a few basketball games represents a stark contrast to an emergency situation aboard a seagoing vessel. But, if you can’t tell the difference, then I wish you luck in life.
The same train? What train is that? The train NBA-paycheck-ville? Martin is on a team that has a chance to make the playoffs and most commentators feel the Martin trade worked well for all teams involved. All aboard!
So, excuse me for formulating my own opinion, but it seems like the really smart thing for Hawes to do is quit undermining his coach in the media, focus on his game, and not let outside distractions take away from his value as a player. If he earns a reputation as a bitch, it’s gonna work against him.
The same advice goes for you. Next time you want to personally attack me, make it a logical and a worthwhile argument. Not some lame assumptions and Titanic jokes.
"If you told him to head-butt the wall, he would do it." -- Paul Westphal re: Brockness Monster.
by PhutureKings on Feb 26, 2010 11:30 AM PST up reply actions
wow
Regardless of how much money Hawes makes, he still has a boss and has to deal with a lot of the same organizational dynamics the rest of productive humantity has to. That includes the possibility of having a coach that has an irrational dislike of you; I’m not saying PW does have that, but it is possible.
Also, you probably don’t want to throw the insults around, not much productive comes of it.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
What insult?
I responded to a personal attack by calling it like I see it. And you , Sir, made a nice little point regarding bosses, so I respect that.
However, my point is that Spencer would have had this problem with any boss. You can’t throw your coach under the bus and expect nothing to come of it. He got what he deserved. If Hawes is a good player, then I don’t get why an NBA coach, whose job depends on success, would arbitrarily instigate a feud with the franchise’s supposed future starting center.
"If you told him to head-butt the wall, he would do it." -- Paul Westphal re: Brockness Monster.
by PhutureKings on Feb 26, 2010 1:18 PM PST up reply actions
However, my point is that Spencer would have had this problem with any boss. You can’t throw your coach under the bus and expect nothing to come of it. He got what he deserved. If Hawes is a good player, then I don’t get why an NBA coach, whose job depends on success, would arbitrarily instigate a feud with the franchise’s supposed future starting center.
This is the crux of my point, and the point I made in my preview today (albeit very obliquely) at EC. It’s time for Shawes & PW to knock off the horseshit and make it work. If it doesn’t, then it doesn’t.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
calling someone a douche
seems like a pretty straightforward insult; enlighten me on what you meant please, so I know how to take it next time someone calls me a douche, which the over/under on is about 15 minutes.
All I will say about Westphal, is it took less than 30 games for a guy that had been with the organization a long time to want out if you believe anything you read. And even comments Westphal himself has made seem to indicate he wanted Kevin gone as quickly as possible.
I’m not at all saying we know that to also be the case with Hawes, we don’t have nearly enough information to assert that. But given the short leash, and not starting the season and all the other things including this incident, its at least plausible that Westphal would really like a Center other than Spencer Hawes. Westphal certainly seems to have shown he’s capable of having an influence on whether or not existing players stay.
Let’s just hope they both work it out. If they both want to, there’s no reason why this has to be an issue.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
I think Kevin wanted out for reasons more than PW. I really do.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
And this whole "PW wanted Kevin out" is creating a wholy different dynamic that may need time to suss out.
God I love StR. Everything Kevin Martin is always drama related. This is exactly Ron Artest redux.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Definition: Douche
My understanding of a douche, and correct me if I am wrong, is someone who makes a personal attack against someone else, instead of criticizing the content of their remarks.
However, if someone makes a personal attack by calling someone a "douche, " then don’t they themselves become a douche by making a personal attack?
If so, then a douche would also include anyone who calls someone else a douche.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Kings in general
The Kings have been pretty bad as a team for a few years now, however, this year they are setting a record for futility. No offense, (14 points/quarter) no defense(other teams scoring highs). They have a future all star in Tyreke at some position but right now, not at the point. He is probably the best player in the league going to the basket. He makes unbelievable lay ins. That said, he offers little else. No jump shot, 3 point shot, does not see and/or get the ball to open players. Walks the ball up the court and uses up the clock dribbling around. These faults will vanish with experience and good coaching. He will get a lot of playing time because he is PW/s baby and can do no wrong. Now all the other players are scared to death to make a mistake, if they do, out they come.
The PW/SH escapade is really detrimental to this already mishmash of a team. If PW had a problem with any player it should have been behind closed doors and settled prior to opening the door. He could have not played Hawes without adding the embarassment of not suiting up but no, he had to add his arrogant remarks post game. A pie in the face is what PW should have received the way he handled the situation. Also punish everyone, not just Hawes. I strongly feel that all who spoke, told the truth and what’s wrong with that. Right now the Kings, as a team, are a screwed up mess……and it’s the coaches fault, not the players..
by Bill2 on Feb 24, 2010 2:14 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Setting a record for futility?
That would be the Nets.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Or last year's Kings.
If you exceed your win total from the prior season, I don’t think you can set a record for futility.
"If you told him to head-butt the wall, he would do it." -- Paul Westphal re: Brockness Monster.
by PhutureKings on Feb 25, 2010 10:19 AM PST up reply actions
Too true PK.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Exceeding a 17 win season, by 1
when you draft 2 of the top 6 rookies in the draft is not a major accomplishment. Natt could have done that.
And, the fact that we’ve done it, isn’t as important and the lack of progress we’ve made after 55 games.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
I expect that
Having won more than last year means that we now tank and aren’t as interested in winning. Yeah, we may see a set starting lineup, but only because the coach has met his need to win more than last year and can sacrifice the rest of the season to developing chemistry.
I think the primary issue
Is that this team, as it stands, is looking extremely similar to the Natt-led Kings of last year. Getting blown out by bad teams at home? Check. Confusing lineup decisions and rotations? Check. Regression of play on both the offensive and defensive ends of the court? Check.
I’m still very much pro-Westphal, but I think he’s starting to lose the benefit of the doubt.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I have a different recollection of the Natt era.
There is no way that I would compare Westphal with Natt. None. Natt had nothing redeeming that I could see as a coach. Nothing. He looked and acted like he didn’t know what he was doing. They team played as if there was no direction. He was clueless as to how to deal with his players. His post-game interviews were lame. He was the worst coach imaginable.
Westphal, on the other hand has a lot of redeeming values as a coach. He is a bright man, who was an outstanding player in his day. He does take an unconventional approach, but unlike Natt who had no identifiable approach, it is an approach. I see Westphal’s current actions, changing his starting lineups, as a means to an end. I do not believe that we are seeing Westphal’s end product. He is using this season to assess his players in game situations and to use game situations as part of their overall training. He is giving players opportunities to play that they might not otherwise get. He places players in situations to see how they will respond. He is learning about the players and they, in turn, are learning about themselves. We are not winning very many games, because the team isn’t very good, at this point.
I am glad you are still very much pro-Westphal, because I think we are only at the beginning of what we will see from him as a coach. We need to be patient and allow him to do his work.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
I just hope all this magnificent coaching includes things like:
1) an identifiable offensive philosophy
2) players being taught where they should be on the court at any given time
3) team defense
4) holding your best player as accountable as the others
5) putting players in situations they have a reasonable chance to succeed
6) an offense that results in an open shot more than one out of eight possessions
sometime soon.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Actually Natt couldn't have done that. Because Natt was not retained.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Respectfully disagree
The Kings have won 18 games vs. 12 to this point last year, a 50% increase.
Last year, they had lost 13 games (to date) by more than 20 points, 4 of those by 30+, 2 more by 40+.
This year, they have lost 3 games by 20+, with one of those games being in excess of 30.
This is a far more competitive team than last year’s squad. Now, that may speak more about how bad last year’s team was, but the bottom line is that this team is significantly better than last year’s team, in my opinion.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
There you go backing up what you say. I should do that sometime. I hear it does good things in the court of public opinion.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Those numbers may be correct
But I’d argue that this team right now would have trouble beating Natt’s team from the same timeframe last season.
That’s the one thing that’s really struck me watching this team lately – the things that made them so fun to watch earlier in the season (even in the losses) appear to be out of reach right now. It’s painful to watch them right now – the disorganization, the lackluster play…it is very reminiscent.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I might be alone in this but I'm glad this stuff happened.
For those guys who thought wins would be coming to them if they continued to play hard? Yeah, that’s life in the NBA. It’s rarely that simple.
They need to run better sets, more crisply and consistently if they want to win more games. It’s that simple. Losing does take it’s toll, but it a young NBA team doesn’t realize how it’s easy to lose they won’t appreciate what it is that allows them to win.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
"Painful to watch"
Most definitely! That last game was just freakin’ awful!
I tend to not watch other team’s games that much and it is just a sad comment that I enjoyed watching the NY Knicks game (Sergio was Awesome!) more than the Kings game against the Pistons. They almost beat the Celtics. The Knicks are more fun to watch than the Kings. That just sucks!
The Kings have a future that doesn't completely revolve around 2 max FA's though. The Knicks can't say the same.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I know
Just saying that it is a sad comment to say that about a Knicks game. Sergio had 18 pts., 6 asts, 5 rebs, and only 3 TOs in 38 minutes.
I may end up regretting losing Sergio, in the end, that Martin and that is saying a lot…
Can't agree with you there. Sergio also wanted out. You should listen to the Roto Radio link (it's linked at EC via CK if you want to listen to what Sam said about Sergio).
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Oh I kinda figured that. No surprise.
Players want to play and I don’t blame him. Doesn’t mean I won’t miss him though. His spark really helped, IMO.
The one thing you can say about GP is he puts players that leave in the position to be successful. Martin back with Adelman and Sergio with Dantoni, both perfect fits and they have to love him for that.
Now if he can just do that same damn thing for his own team I will be happy.
Petrie has also traded players or let them walk in FA who were successful in Sac and weren't as successful elsewhere too.
It’s a 2 way street.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
A loss is a loss,
but my bet is the 101-89 loss that we suffered the other night would have been a 111-79 loss last year. As bad as the game was the other night, it wasn’t truly over until there were a few minutes left in the game. Last year, there would have been absolutely no reason to watch the 4th quarter.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Oh come on
No offense section, but that game the other night was never in doubt. I think the closest it got was 12 points right?
That’s not overly impressive, considering the opponent and being on our home floor.
I guess ultimately we are arguing over what’s worse…gonorrhea or syphilis?
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Let me try to do a better job of making my point
Statistically, if you are down fewer possessions than minutes left in the game, you at least have a shot of coming back. The Kings were down 9 possessions to open the quarter and then managed to reduce the possessions to 4 possessions with a little more than 4 minutes left in the game, and they had the ball. Evans and Dorsey alone made the 4th quarter worth watching, and that just would not have been the case last year.
Is this a bad team right now? Absolutely. Does it compare to last year’s team, especially the post-all star break version? No way.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
You are right
Last year’s team was still worse. But not by a whole lot. I did a quick data analysis of the last 11 games (which covers the games played so far in February). Interestingly enough, both schedules included 7 road games and four home games. Both teams went 2-9 during that stretch. And both teams averaged just over 100 points per game.
Difference is, this year’s team has given up an average of about 113 points, this year’s 109.
So there’s definitely a bit of a statistical improvement defensively…but otherwise, there’s a lot of similarities.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Sorry, just to clarify
I looked at games 47-57 last season and this season. Just eyeballing the schedule, I’d say they were pretty close in difficulty as well.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Bleh
Should be:
Difference is, last year’s team gave up an average of about 113 points in that stretch, this year’s 109.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I'm just building up my post count
Next week, I’m going to start replying one letter at a time.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Beyotch
;)
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Detroit played scrubs the whole 4th quarter,
and if they wanted to they could have run the score up without any problem.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
In your opinion
As they didn’t play, we won’t know. What we do know is that the Kings that were on the floor did not quit, and they closed the gap, which is something that could not be said about last year’s team.
I stand by my statement – we are still one of the worst teams in the league, but we are night and day compared to last season.
There is a reason to watch this team this season, even with the way that they have been playing recently. You are welcome to disagree with that, of course. But I know that I am enjoying watching this team a million times more than the team that was on the floor at this time last season.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Feb 25, 2010 8:35 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Can I get an Amen Rabbi 214!
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Yep
A million times better, most of the year, but while it is day and all, it is only the dawn and not that bright yet. The sun is just peaking out to rise and there is lots more daylight on its way.
As long as there isn't a Kfan/214 post where it's all pictures of draft prospects against the Clippers
I can live with the rest of the season. (This is what I’m talking about.)
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Wow, down 35-13 at the end of the 1st Q
that’s not good.
Don't say stupid shit. You won’t be perceived as stupid. - pookeyguru
by Kfan in Korea on Feb 26, 2010 4:04 AM PST up reply actions
Do the Kings really have 2 of the top 6 rookies?
Casspi has been good, for a rookie, but when all is said and done do you really believe he will go down as a top-6 player out of this draft? I don’t.
Name your top 6 cabz.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I'd go top-10
This draft is turning out to be much better than people anticipated.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Mine would be in this order:
Tyreke 1) Steph Curry 2) Brandon Jennings (close enough to Curry he could overtake the 2nd spot) at 3.
Now, whose the other 3 spots? Arguments for James Hardens, Jonas Jerebko, DeMar DeRozan, Taj Gibson (I suppose), DeJuan Blair (he’s top 5—I did forget about him) among others. I think you can safely say Omri is in the top 6 and maybe top 5 if you take out Darren Collison’s recent play.
Right now I think people would go: Evans, Curry, Blair, Jennings, Collison and then Casspi. Seem’s fair to me.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Thabeet??
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I know it's a joke, but, contrary to popular belief, I'm not interested in being mean.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Feel better soon, pookey
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I feel fine Otis.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I know
Just trying to get you interested in being mean.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Only when I have to. Which I had to earlier with MM today.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
If you look at PER, playing time and productivity,
Casspi is probably the 4th best rookie right now, behind Evans, Jennings and Curry. That’s not to say that he will be the 4th best player to come out of this draft, but he is the 4th best player today.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
I like to be objective sir.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
On NBA.com individual statistics
under PTS/Rebs/Asts by rookies, Tyreke is 1st and Omri is 5th. Plus Omri was voted into the starting lineup of the Rookie Challenge. So, I’d say he’s top 6.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
I get your point
but why do you feel strongly that the players told the truth? From what we’ve read I think you could make the assertion that the players expressed their feelings truthfully but it’s not the same thing.
I don’t know if you saw Donté’s post games comments last night but he said something to the effect " I blew a bunch of defensive assignments and I understand why coach pulled me". He also said the other players need to “suck it up”. The one thing that Westphal has done for Donté this season is to make him coachable,I I think that’s a lesson Spencer hasn’t learned yet.
We are all speculating wildly, but since I’m at it, I’m sure that Paul Westphal didn’t make the decision to act on Spencer lightly. We have no idea what’s been going on behind the scene. Just from from Spencer’s unwillingness to take the fitness evaluation with the team and his refusal to show up at Summer League especially with the addition of a new coach I have no doubts that there is more to this story than we’ve have or will have been told.
"I make love to pressure" - Stephen Jackson
Carl Landry didn't make excuses either.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Donte
would have to be the stupidest person on the planet to say anything other than what he said after the game last night.
What else could he have said?
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Poured a shot on the floor..."This one for my Homie"...
Hard work beats talent when talent is hardly working...
Thankfully
Donte isn’t the stupidest person on the planet, though that would have been hilarious.
:-)
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
"Gonna go ask L'il Tae why I didn't get mo minutes"
“JT, want to go to Benihana’s?”
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 4:37 PM PST up reply actions
Those are probably actual quotes from his Twitter
Do you follow Donte on Twitter? He talks about his son all the time, and goes to Benihana’s with JT probably twice a week at minimum.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions
I don't mind the coach having so much power
I do mind though a coach whose substitution patterns seem arbitrary and clearly aren’t coming up with magic formulas to win. If we are going to lose, we should lose with our core, that way we can see if they are developing and what we need to fix it. Can’t the tinkering occur in practice.
What core, man?
Besides Evans, what are you talking about? We’ve got a team of all young players. We don’t really know at this point who is best at certain positions and who plays best with other players. We have some ideas, but I think it takes a lot of different experiments before the chemistry is understood fully.
That being said, there are times when the team seems to be doing pretty well and someone will get subbed out and I don’t like it. I get being frustrated with that. But, beyond Evans (who arguably might not be our PG of the future if we get a guy like Wall, for instance) is definitely our best player and is obviously starting every game. The rest of the “core” is just too uncertain to declare anyone a permanent starter.
"If you told him to head-butt the wall, he would do it." -- Paul Westphal re: Brockness Monster.
by PhutureKings on Feb 25, 2010 10:24 AM PST up reply actions
I think I have this figured out.
Hawes and Westphal did have a meeting. But you see much to Westies chagrin Hawes decided to turncoat on the conservative party and officially denounce Westies good friend Rush Limbaugh.
After which Hawes announced that he believed the GOP was dead and was turning Liberal.
Thus leading to Westie benching the youngun’ and making him learn his “role”.
Just a thought.
;)
Blessings.Love.Peace
by lifestyleforthesellout on Feb 24, 2010 2:52 PM PST reply actions
Everyone is Jumping on Amick's Article
… As the reason for SH benching and therefore the root of PW’s pettiness. The Kings just had their first practice since trading Martin trade and getting Landry.
Is it possible that maybe Spencer did or said something stupid during practice that resulted in his benching?
Simply -
Hawes got what he deserved when it came to the suspension. It’s Westphal’s ball and he can go home with it anytime he likes. However, just because Hawes acted like an “immature douchebag” (quoting Holmdel), this does not mean that Westphal has to act like an immature douchebag.
Westphal has the power, and he should conduct himself in that manner, both in and out of the press. He was extremely douchey when he announced the suspension, and was even more douchey when he was asked about it after the game.
If Westphal wants a level of respect and professionalism from his team, he needs to lead the way. I like Westphal, and I support his suspension of Hawes if he felt that it was needed. But his comments to the media were churlish and childish, and I think that he should apologize to his team for that.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Feb 24, 2010 2:54 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
While I take your word for what Pw said
I want to hear it for myself. It’s irritating the team took that video down.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Is this like the LeBron video, Did Cadillac have the video removed. Is this the start of Westygate
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
by HighTops on Feb 24, 2010 3:08 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
One might hope HT.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
"Well, he knows his role now."
Delivered with full smirk and snark.
Better approach for a coach demanding respect, professionalism and accountability: “We have rules and procdedures here, and Spencer did not abide by those rules procedures. Out of respect for Spencer, I won’t delve into the specifics. But this is the NBA, and only a priveliged few earn the right to play at this level. The right is earned, not given. Spencer understands that, but it continues to be a work in progress. The coaching staff and I are here to help Spencer with his growth if he decides to take advantage of this opportunity.”
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Feb 24, 2010 3:26 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I agree with your points. I don't like what PW did. I'm not arguing that I agree with it.
And your revised statement is spot on.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
The smirk is what got me
It really just seemed completely out of character from what I have seen so far. PW has come across as a very nice guy… but now I kind of wonder if that is just a front. He really seemed like a smug, snarky, jerk. It was completely unprofessional and over the top.
Are you offering your services?
Gentlemen... BEHOLD!!!
by Wrath of Kyle on Feb 24, 2010 3:42 PM PST up reply actions
But I thought you said "quality"
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." - Cardinal Richelieu
OH SNAP!! I guess I am your bottom bitch
Gentlemen... BEHOLD!!!
by Wrath of Kyle on Feb 24, 2010 3:50 PM PST up reply actions
No...
The only bottom bitch around here is Spencer and his ass belongs to PW. At least until this summer.
Well, at least we know it's not a rebound relationship
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 4:40 PM PST up reply actions
Nice
It’s Westphal’s ball and he can go home with it anytime he likes.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 4:38 PM PST up reply actions
I agree with everything that you said, except that I do not think he should apologize.
He might have handled himself a little bit better in the post-game interview, but he didn’t do anything wrong.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
What's going to be longer Westphal's head coaching career or Hawes NBA career.
Westphal can posture all he wants now, Spencer makes more money and is assured of having his option picked up, can Westphal say the same.
The man never wins in the eye of the public, when he puts his heel down on the neck of his subordinates. The moment Westphal made it power struggle between himself and his youthful charge, Westphal lost. And, if you heard his interview after todays practice, you know he’s back pedaling on the whole issue.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
here's my problem with the "role" and the "open door policy"
spencer still does not know what his role is, unless it’s the “role” of which thr rock used to speak when he wanted you to smell what he was cooking.
the “open door policy” wouldn’t do much good as the answer to the “what is my role” question (for anyone but tyreke) would be:
“your role is to show up and look at the starting lineup. if you’re in it you’ll start. if you aren’t, you might not play at all. you might play 8 great minutes in the 2nd quarter and not play at all in the second half. you might have a great game and then play 12 minutes tomorrow for no apparent reason. you might be surpassed in the rotation by a guy who we just got from the wizards for a bag of old socks. you might be asked to guard the fastest 2 guard in the nba even though you’re a 6 10 power forward and then benched because you couldn’t do it. you might be asked to take the minutes of a guy who allegedly has poor conditioning – even though you sweat gravy.”
“so does that clear things up? feel free to come check back anytime to see if your role has changed.”
by lchristmas on Feb 24, 2010 3:57 PM PST via mobile reply actions 9 recs
The door is open, so now they both can look thru it and be angry., Rec'd
I express myself, you acknowledge my concerns, you thank me for my openness, then you tell me to get the hell out of the office because nothing is changing. Your right & I’m wrong. Great system.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
rec'd
Possibly one of the funniest things I have ever read! We’ll done!
by elSAVinator on Feb 25, 2010 12:18 AM PST up reply actions
Linked above
but for those who haven’t seen it, Press conference with Westphal is back.
Spencer comments start at around 2:18.
Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
He was seriously flip. But he was more perturbed later on than he was originally.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
He DID have a crappy couple of days.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
He can fix it all
with a few statements to Peaches and a closed door conversation with Spencer, hopefully he does the right thing.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
That's what I'm hoping for.
I’m going to take loose notes on it.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
You won't need to Peaches will blab it and put his spin on it!
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Is that what he's been doing?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
This I gotta hear.....
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
ALL THE PLAYERS KNOW THEIR ROLE?
Ya sure about that PW??
Hard work beats talent when talent is hardly working...
PW is saying Tyreke's comments
are substantially different than Spencers.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
And they are.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
This is what Spencer said
“All year we’ve kind of been dealing with that,” he said. "When you think you have kind of gotten over that hump, it comes back up again. That’s the philosophy, so you’ve just got to deal with it.
“Everyone up and down the roster has had a taste of that, so everyone can relate. I think it’s kind of tough, the not-knowing part on a game-to-game basis, to get in that rhythm. But that’s the way it’s going and there’s not a whole lot you can do about it.”
vs what Tyreke said
“Guys never know when they’ll be having their time to play or they might be (starting),” Evans said.
“They’re going into the game confused, and when they get into the game they want to impress the coach and (try) to play well. … It’s probably hard for a player to keep that focus when they know that if they’re playing bad they might not go in again.”
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
That's youth talking,
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Tyreke's 20. Spencer's 21.
I haave a 20 year old son. I really don’t expect him to mature exponentially in the next year.
If Spencer got punished for his remarks, then I don’t see why Tyreke didn’t. They said essentially the same thing.
StR Token Female
by LeaguePassAddict on Feb 25, 2010 8:10 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
PW said a few times that he's spoken with Spencer about this sort of thing before
So, Spencer is a repeat offender, and the punishments are harsher for repeat offenders.
Also, Spencer’s comment suggested a disclaiming of responsibility for his performance, which probably struck a nerve. Tyreke’s did not.
Also, the difference between the two is not the one year, it is that Spencer has been in the League 3 years and knows the drill with the press corps, while Tyreke is still learning.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
I unlike you LPA
Was a 20 year old man. I’m well aware of what it means to be 20 in a grown man’s world. But, the difference is the intent: I think Tyreke was talking about team performance (his remarks didn’t seem to be about Reke as much) and certainly Sean May felt the need to apologize and clarify his remarks without PW asking him. May knew he stepped out of bounds. But Spence didn’t?
I’m not saying the team needs to trade Spence, but I am saying that Spence doesn’t always act maturely in every situation. That needs to be dealt with accordingly. (This did happen with Tyrus Thomas whose 23. And, I find it surprising that I’m taking the sides with the Bulls organization on this one.)
That said tomorrow’s another day, and the day after that is another new day and what not. I’m not taking anybody’s side, but I don’t think Tyreke got a free pass the way you claim he did. If he did get that, it’s because he’s a franchise player. Age has nothing to do with it.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I'm having a tought time parsing the difference between those statements
in the context of 20 or 21 year olds being interviewed in an unprepared setting.
This isn’t lawyers writing up something, or even a carefully crafted email you are sending for work. You’re talking about young guys in an impromptu setting and claiming there’s a significant difference between what they said?
I just don’t see it.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
I think the difference is
that when Tyreke said PW’s rotations were “retarded”, he was using the term as “political satire”.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
by Holmdel on Feb 24, 2010 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
It was the comments that Spencer made later to PW that were different from
the comments Tyreke made later to PW.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
That's not what I heard
PW say on Peaches’ show.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Right
He said that he didn’t have a “problem” with it.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
...
Hawes’ comments make it clear he’s experiencing this, and Tyreke’s are obviously from an outside perspective. They come across very differently. Hawes is speaking for himself; Evans is speaking for others.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 4:57 PM PST up reply actions
Pretty much.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
(Thanks for that PTBNL.)
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
You're welcome
It’s what I do. That and look at LOLcats.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:05 PM PST up reply actions
so its better
for Evans to complain on behalf of his teammates to the media, than for the players to do so for themselves?
I don’t see how that’s better.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
one appears selfish
and the other doesn’t.
Exactly
Hawes appears to be saying that he’s annoyed that he’s not getting consistent minutes. Tyreke is saying other players try too hard when they get in the game because their minutes are largely performance-based. Honestly I don’t see their comments as very similar at all.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:02 PM PST up reply actions
Hawes didn't say that
he said its tough to prepare for the minutes he gets not knowing when he’s going to get them.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
I'd say he did
I think it’s kind of tough, the not-knowing part on a game-to-game basis, to get in that rhythm. But that’s the way it’s going and there’s not a whole lot you can do about it.
There IS a lot you can do about it…PLAY CONSISTENT BASKETBALL. Rebound. Etc. Hawes’ minutes are inconsistent because he’s inconsistent. And I think a lot of the stuff he does that makes him inconsistent is stuff he can change without having to get consistent minutes, like boxing out hard on rebounds, not putting the ball on the ground around the basket, etc. Thompson’s minutes have suffered for pretty much the same reasons, but JT knows to keep his mouth shut and work on his game, apparently.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:10 PM PST up reply actions
Thompson's gotten an almost entirely free pass
for making the same stupid plays Spencer gets benched for but that’s a separate issue.
I posted above, when Spencer does the things (rebound supposedly) that in theory should get him extra minutes, his game minutes in subsequent games don’t bear out that he does.
And, no, PW controls Spencer’s minutes. He defended himself passionately that he has Spencer and the team’s best interests at heart on Peaches’ show, and I want to believe him. That I have the slightest doubt it might be true bugs me, a lot.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
This
I posted above, when Spencer does the things (rebound supposedly) that in theory should get him extra minutes, his game minutes in subsequent games don’t bear out that he does.
Doesn’t make sense to me. If Hawes is rebounding against Detroit, for example, why should that have anything to do with his playing time against Utah? He should play more AGAINST DETROIT, but if he’s not doing his job when we play Utah he should be held accountable for that. And Thompson gets benched more often than you think…it’s partially hidden by the fact that a lot of his mistakes result in fouls on him, which result in him being removed from the game anyway.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:17 PM PST up reply actions
There's no way to do any comparison within games
because by definition the data stopped being collected (he was out of the game) in the games he gets pulled. And I give you that what I posted may or may not be significant.
I disagree on Thompson, but that’s nearly here nor there.
We’ll see what happens, hopefully they figure it out, because this team really, really needs Spencer to be good, if they’re going to be good anytime in the near future.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
As the team's coach, I am sure he does have the team's best interests at heart.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
I think PTBNL hit it on the head
If I was Spencer’s boss, the thing that would drive me nuts is if he acted like he had no responsibility for his play or his minutes. And saying “there’s not a whole lot you can do about it” sounds too much like “I have no responsibility for how I play”, and would set me off if I was PW.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
I guess you've never made a mistake on your job.
If you have, has your boss ever demoted you?
How many 7 foot centers do we have? How many better centers do we have. Isn’t the point that you can go to the bench only so many times before you realize he’s the best you have. and, as such, you need to work with him more to make him better, instead of replacing him every time things don’t go well.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
I think the question is, how do you reach the one 7 foot center you have
And PW thinks it is by cracking down. Who am I to say he’s wrong?
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
Uhm
You’ve also never been a 7 foot center in the NBA making a ton of money. So who are you to say Spencer’s wrong?
I know that’s kind of a silly point, but there’s the possibility that both of these guys are in the wrong here.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I guess I'm a military-style discipline guy
I liked what PW had to say about instilling in the team a discipline in which they all work hard to do what’s in the best interestsof the team on and off the court, and that part of that is not complaining to the press about minutes. I say Spencer’s wrong in this because he should shut his damn mouth and focus on getting better.
It’s a matter of perspective and whether you like PW more than Spence or vice versa. And I guess I’m siding with PW on this one. My Dad made me watch a lot of John Wayne and James Cagney movies when I was little, so I guess it was inevitable.
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
Fair enough
I’m just not a big fan of doing the dirty work through the press – on either side. What it tells me is that PW might not be instilling that discipline, and is creating a gulf between himself and his players. It also brings into question the communication between the parties.
Spencer’s doesn’t appear to be the only one who doesn’t understand his role – and I realize PW claims to have an “open-door” policy, but communication is a two way street.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Doesn't it seem like it is a double standard?
I am previous service military as well and can appreciate rules of conduct, but they are more respected when everybody abides by them.
PW said they don’t air their greviances in the press and then did exactly that. He, by that act, violated his own policies.
Let me just be clear.
I appreciate that PW is going to maintain discipline, but he served nobody’s best interest by what he did in that post-game interview. It just smells bad for a lot of reasons.
He is probably even correct to bench Hawes for ongoing problems, but what they presented to the fans and media was not their best face.
I wonder why PW doesn't want the team to speak to the press about their grievances?
Could it just be to avoid this sort of thing? Remember, the players violated the rules of conduct, which got the issue into the paper in the first place. Had they kept their mouths shut, none of this would have happened.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
And if PW wouldn't have reacted as he had
these threads would have had 20 comments, not 500.
There’s blame to go around.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Players are expected to talk to the press
Sam Amick is given as much access to the players as the coaching staff. PW said it himself in the interview after practice, that reporters just dream of having a player say something controversial so the can make a story out of it.
Credit Amick to going to other players to get a comformation of the story before going to press with it. Yes, Spencer could have refused to comfirm what May said and the whole thing might have blown over. But, PW could have handled it internally, and it would have blown over as well.
And, this hasn’t ended. The players who spoke out still have the same feelings, and making an example of Hawes, didn’t fix that.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
Hawes refused comment.
So unless you keep bringing it up, right now you’re the only one HT.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Gents
Both lttg & I have been in the military too. Let’s not make this about service conduct? It’s not one & the same. (Although my 20 year old in a grown man’s world did stem from that.)
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Navy.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Ack. Sorry to hear that. (Also why I didn't join the Army.)
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Wise decision.
Eating dust is a foxhole with bombs and artillery being launched behind you and blowing up in front of you is no fun.
You don't have to convince me of that.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I'm prior active duty, too
Air Force.
I was air crew. I won’t even begin to tell you how easy my job was and the great traveling I did. …And I still hated the military, so that’s saying something!
"If you told him to head-butt the wall, he would do it." -- Paul Westphal re: Brockness Monster.
by PhutureKings on Feb 25, 2010 2:35 PM PST up reply actions
Am not surprised.
Lotta sports fans in the military and always will be.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Tyreke is very clear about his role so these changing lineups don't affect him personally.
Show up to the game and play in the starting lineup.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Cheescake and peaches serving up softball questions
Hard work beats talent when talent is hardly working...
I agree with PW on benching Spence
Ya Tyreke made some comments too. He is a rookie though, Spence has been in the league for 3 yrs now and knows better. I think this is Tyreke’s get out of jail free card as it pertains to the media. Hopefully PW can lite a fire under Spences ass like Singletary did to Vernon Davis.
PW on 1140
Wow, it’s becoming very clear he and Spence aren’t on speaking terms.
Dip til I rip
by Muff209 on Feb 24, 2010 4:51 PM PST via mobile reply actions
Yep. It is that.
But who is that on?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
He also isn't back talking to PW through the media.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
both of them
obviously they need to work on their communication skills
I don't think communication is PW's problem. I really don't.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
He's got a young roster.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Amazingly young
Our average player is 24.85 years old. That’s pretty crazy.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:01 PM PST up reply actions
Memphis and OKC are younger
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Sure,
They’re not stuck with Nocioni, and didn’t choose to have an older player like Udoka on their roster. Without those two our average is under 24 (I think…I didn’t save the data).
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:06 PM PST up reply actions
Sure
I’m just saying – we tend to talk about how young the roster is. There’s young with potential (OKC, Portland, Houston and Memphis), and there’s young with the jury still out (Sacramento, Minnesota).
I think there’s occasionally false logic used in evaluating PW. Namely, the roster is young so he’s doing a good job. When in reality, the roster is young, but he may or may not be doing a good job.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Agreed
One thing those teams that are “young with potential” have in common is that they’re not TOO deep and they’re top heavy.
Also, those teams were not the teams they are now when their best player was a rookie…it took at least one year. This is Durant’s second year, and he’s at another level now.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:15 PM PST up reply actions
Whoops
Yeah, that. Remember OKC had the third pick this year. They weren’t exactly awesome in Durant’s first or second years, either.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:19 PM PST up reply actions
And they've had 4 top 5 picks in 3 years. Not sayin jus sayin....
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I think he's done as well as he can.
And that’s part of the real problem Michael. He’s got a young roster still finding their bearings in the NBA. It’s hard to get teams to automatically transfer that over into NBA success quickly.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
PW has outstanding communication skills.IMO
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
As usual
It’s a little bit of both. Spence obviously has had some attitude issues but Westphal is handling it like a little kid.
Dip til I rip
by Muff209 on Feb 24, 2010 4:55 PM PST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Rick Adelman said the same shit Muff. Is he a child too?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Paul Westphal is no Rick Adelman
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Not saying that he is.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
He's dancing.
Rick was a man of few words and said what he meant. Westphal is just trying to say the right things
Dip til I rip
by Muff209 on Feb 24, 2010 5:00 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Rick danced in the media too Muff. I'm sorry.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I saw a presser the other day with Rick dancing with the Houston media.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I think they are different
There is a bit of “wanting to please” in Westphal for the most part. I’m not sure Rick ever really gave a crap what anyone thought of him.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
As I recall there was a little bit
of wanting to please the first year he was here too. of course after that it was look this is the way it is. Amazing how putting together a 50 win season will get you some cachet.
Yeah that's true.
I didn’t listen to Rick’s first season on KHTK though.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
That's the real problem
Spencer is 21 years old. He’s going to act like a child.
What I want to know…has PW mentioned whether the comments in the Bee are the full gist of what pissed him off and forced Spencer into street clothes last night? Or was there something additional?
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
That isn't going to get said.
I think that’s what happened before this interview. I know that’s what happened now
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Or let me say this differently
I thought Spence mouthed off behind the scenes. I know that now.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
You do?
How?
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I know it. Can't prove it. We can agree there is a difference right?
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Sure
I’m just not listening to the interview, so I’m trying to understand what you are saying here.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
I'm going to post something in the next 5 mins or so about this interview and my impressions about it.
Read that. I hope that will explain any gaps in your thinking.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
But there are no gaps in yours?
That’s quite an assumption to make that there was a previous conversation, unless you’re psychic.
StR Token Female
by LeaguePassAddict on Feb 25, 2010 8:15 AM PST up reply actions
Of course not. I'm completely infallible.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
what a coincidence, my wife is too
and my girlfriend is completely inflatable.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
LOL HT.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Does she have an inflated opinion of herself too?
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." - Cardinal Richelieu
After practice
Spencer said he hadn’t talked to Westphal about it at that point.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
I know.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
otis he said essentially Spencer was complaining about his minutes
and Tyreke wasn’t.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Yep.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
But all related to the Bee article itself?
Or was there more of an issue between them?
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
When asked
he wouldn’t answer the question. I’ll give him some credit for not embarrassing Spencer further.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
That's sweet of him!
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
If he wouldn't answer the question when asked, then that probably means there
was more of an issue, besides the Bee. Otherwise, he simply would have said “No.”
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Not if he has an ounce of media relations skills
which he does. He has to answer the question by not going into it, and then he has to spout the bullshit company line about how much he likes Spencer, which he did.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Or, he's avoiding saying that there wasn't anything else, and he handled it badly
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
PW is trying to motivate Spence
A lot of people would say that Singletary was in the wrong when he embarassed Vernon Davis on the field and in the media…then all of a sudden he is a different player now, a pro bowler in fact…different people need to be motivated different ways. I know one thing, nobody will be questioning the coaching staff anytime soon
This isn't the NFl.
I really don’t like cross-sport analogies.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
We are talking about player coach relationship..
I didnt mention anything about running the ball or scoring touchdowns
I know. But it's very different in the NBA than the NFL. That's really my point.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Very true
14 men vs. 53 men. 1000 coaches vs. 5 or 6. Completely different game with different responsibilities. Etc.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 24, 2010 5:20 PM PST up reply actions
Much different personalities too.
NFL coaches could never get away with what they do in the NFL in the NBA.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Here's the real issue IMO
And perhaps the reason some of us are in Spencer’s corner on this – because the comments made by those players are factually accurate.
Additionally, I just don’t like the idea of a coach hypocritically disciplining a player who bitches through the media…through the media.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
That's where I disagree a bit with you
I don’t think PW bitched through the media last night. He was answering questions.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
You misunderstand
Spencer did the bitching…PW did the disciplining.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
Than I guess I did misunderstand.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I'm only going to chime in with this
I took the quotes in the Bee, not as whining, but players, matter of factly saying how hard it is to play with flucuating lineups when asked a direct question. Anyone who has played knows this generally results in 2 responses , one, a player who plays timidly and in fear that the first mistake gets him benched, or the other kind, one who plays selfishly tring to do something so dynamic that he buys himself more playing time. The only players who are immune are stars who are confident that their play will be stellar, not players trying to establish themselves.
I also think PW was unprofessional being that snarky to the press out a player. He was much more of a pro on KHTK today.
I believe 1 of the 3 bigs has to go. they can’t work together, I just don’t know which one.
There are some guys smarter than me, some guys better looking, I take comfort in the fact that there is no guy that is both.
Paul Westphal knows which one
he’s made it abundently clear.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
In my mind its got to be Hawes or Landry
you cannot have 2 bigs that can’t RB.
Can you imagine a front line of Hawe Landry and Greene? We would never get a RB.
There are some guys smarter than me, some guys better looking, I take comfort in the fact that there is no guy that is both.
Get used to JT/Landry
and whatever big we draft, plus the cap space used on someone like Dalembert. We’ll succeed then in the Maloof’s vision of losing 60% of our games 94-85 while making Jeff Van Gundy’s teams seem positively explosive and watching Tyreke, Omri and Donte try to beat three guys off the dribble each time up the floor.
And we’ll be having fun, because that’s a 30 or so win season, so we’ll be able to talk about how improved we are.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
by Grasul on Feb 24, 2010 8:39 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm getting bitter now
haha :-)
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Haha seriously
Is it all the PW drama?
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
It is
that and the posturing of defending the indefensible.
Sean May says minutes are inconsistent and makes playing tough.
Spencer get asked about May’s comments, he agrees.
Tyreke gets asked, he says yah some guys on the team seem to have a tough time with inconsistent minutes.
Then Sean May runs to the coach and says, wait, wait I didn’t mean it like it sounds.
Then Westphal punishes Spencer, and goes out of his way to publicly humiliate him while doing nothing to the other two guys.
In the interview explaining himself, Westphal says he was punished because players should play and coaches should coach.
Westphal tries to make the case that Tyreke said something materially different than Spencer, which is ridiculous given what Westphal’s complaint was. Westphal said he didn’t punish Spencer because he’s selfish, or skipped a workout two years ago or skipped summer league or because he’s an asshole, he said he punished Spencer for telling him how to coach.
How you can read Tyreke’s statement and Spencer’s and say either of them say something different with regard to coaching is beyond me. If you think one of them is complaining that players are having a tough time with inconsistent minutes, you have to say they both were, which means they both were complaining about the coaching regardless of who they are complaining on behalf of.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
by Grasul on Feb 25, 2010 5:56 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I understand where you're coming from
And that’s why I’m trying to stay away from this one as much as possible. We’ve had way too much drama in the past couple weeks and with the team continuing to lose, all we have to talk about is negative stuff.
We’re thinking and analyzing things way too much. I’m just trying to take a mental break from all the crap.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
Which you're doing successfully.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Soft
And that’s why I’m trying to stay away from this one as much as possible.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
he didn't discipline him through the media
he sat his ass on the bench that was the discipline. the media just took it and ran with it.
no, no, no
PW said “I guess Spencer knows what his role is tonight.” to the media. Even Paul Westphal in his interview acknowledged that he could have done that better.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
That's why I give PW room. That's the only reason.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
PW didn't just step off the bus Lotus
He knew what he was doing, and that was busting Spencer’s balls publicly in order to punish him. Let’s at least be realistic about that…
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Here is what I don't get.
I have read and re-read Spencer’s comments. Where does he explicitly state that he doesn’t know his role? That isn’t in his comments at all. Because of this I tend to agree that more happened and was probably said.
It seems like PW is very hard on Spencer and that Spencer is on his shit list. So, Spencer says basically the same thing as two other players and gets nailed, while they get a pass.
Spencer is probably on his shit list.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Has been since summertime.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Completely agree on this point
And it hasn’t seemed to get any better. Who decided he was to take on the role of Union rep and when that was done is what I would like to know? Putting somebody who is already at odds with coaching staff already isn’t the best choice.
I don't think that's how that works MBS.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I'm pretty sure the players didn't factor the coach into the equation. In fact, why would they?
It has nothing to do with it.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
It wouldn't be much of a union
if the coaches or management got to decide who was or wasn’t reps.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
Yep this too.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I thought your write-up was very good and insightful.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Thanks.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
On a side note
I listened to the interview, and to me, proved Peaches wrong on a different topic. Back when he called Martin "mentally weak’ ….. he mentioned that Kevin said that the trade rumors were affecting the team. Peaches shot back (paraphrasing) “Please, it’s not affecting the team at all. The team doesn’t care.”
During the PW interview, when talking about recent struggles, he said something like, “I think trade rumors affected our team, but it affected the other team as well. it’s a sign of a young team. I think they (Kings players) didn’t handle it well emotionally cause there a young team.”
So Peaches said it didn’t matter, Paul said it did. Who am I going to believe?
A bit late to the party but I've been thinking about a couple things
Has PW ever talked bad about player to the media? or even criticize that player or players for their performances?
I’m really not siding with anyone here and I want to stay away from this topic as much as possible but as far as I can remember (and that’s why I asked the previous question) coah Westphal has never come out and said that a player wasn’t doing enough or that they weren’t getting it, or just something along those lines.
If Spencer (and May and Reke) ‘criticized’ PW through the media wouldn’t that break a bit of a code of trust that the team had? Again, I’m not picking sides, just trying to understand the situation a bit better.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
My impression of listening to PW's post-game interviews...
PW has been very tactful in talking about his players. I haven’t heard him speak bad about any of his players to the media. His comments about Spencer is the first I have every seen him make about anyone.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
Maybe
Maybe Spencer’s comments to the media were a watered down version of something else that took place either in practice or behind closed doors. Maybe Westphal invited Spencer into his office via the open door after reading Spencer’s comments and then Spencer’s 21 year old mouth got the best of him.
Maybe Westphal has more power than previous coaches, maybe he doesn’t. Perhaps he has more balls than previous coaches. Perhaps he is a coach dealing with a team filled with young millionaires that also happens to be in the thick of a huge collapse. I think Westphal was well within his right as the head coach to sit Spencer, and I hope that Westphal didn’t have to go to the front office and ask for permission to do so.
Not sure if this was posted in the thread yet
but here is PW’s comments after todays practice. Seemed a lot more upbeat about the team, also seemed as if the team had a pretty intense discussion after last nights game. He kind of sheds some light on the whole Spencer situation, and makes the childish comments that some placed upon him seem less reasonable.
Thanks for the video Gilo
I suggest making a fanshot of it. I’m guessing a lot of people want to see it.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
Crapola!
Watched the after practice interviews from PW ans Spence…
Spencer, “I don’t want to talk about what is going on” meaning this is not over and is still happening. He says that he had not talked to PW.
PW, Again, not looking like a nice guy by accusing the Bee reporting of intentionally going after a story and trying to get something negative from Spencer.
Wow, how about PW's last comment in Gilo's link from today's practice
“We want to know who is going to be able to face adversity and overcome it…that was one of the reasons for the changes…”
Translation: “Kevin Martin was not a guy who we thought was able to face adversity and overcome it, so we shipped his ass out.”
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
Yep
That caught my ear too. PW was no big fan of Kevin Martin to say the least. He was looking for competitive spirit, leadership and toughness and he was not getting it. It is more than missing shots, it was the way he played the game. Nothing epitomizes K-Mart level of play upon return from injury for me more than than running prayer @ Nuggets where he was just hoping for a bail out foul call. He could have started packing his bags that night, because his days were numbered from that day forward, if not before.
At that point, PW would have traded him for Tom Landry
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.
What I Took ...
… from the last 30 seconds of that interview. PW has a long term multi year plan for developing this team and it’s young players. Part of that is putting them under pressure by not letting them get comfortable with a set rotation …
It was mentioned earlier here half in jest. But there is probably a large amount of truth in it. Your role is to check the starting line up, if you’re listed as a starter, be ready to start. If not, be ready to come off the bench.
I don't know.
I think a lot of it is that he just doesn’t have players good enough to start all the time. He pretty much said that.
by MustangMBS on Feb 24, 2010 10:27 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Loyalty, Betrayal and what the heck do I know
Aan old fart mature guy’s look at this.
Interesting read above and should probably be put to rest but I will add my own meaningless take on this:
Coach Westphal has been very complimentary and patient with his players in the press. The post game interviews have been upbeat and encouraging, even when frustration runs rampant. This is the same guy who two months ago was in the running for Coach of the Year honors.
The NBA is a select club. Paul Westphal is a long time member having been involved as a high draft pick, on championship clubs, All-Star games, coaching and front office duties. It is my opinion that this select club has some rules one of which is a loyalty rule. You are a team. You live together – you win together, you lose together. The coach is the leader. When you speak out against your team and your coach you betray that loyalty. That is considered a sin of the highest order by some, and I would expect that as a dyed in the wool NBA guy like Paul Westphal, Spencer Hawes crossed that line. And for that betrayal, Spencer recieved a bit of come uppance.
It is not for me to judge if that is right or wrong, I don’t know what happened and can only guess. Paul Westphal has earned some trust with this difficult season and as such I give him the benefit of the doubt in handling this in the way he chose to.
Lastly, in the video linked above on the post game there was a comment on Spencer but there was also a comment that these last few days have been among the worst of his life.. Wow, those are the strongest words I heard on the video not the words about Hawes. I don’t know what Coach Westphal is going through but I have a feeling that who is at the 5 spot is NOT at the top of the list. He may have shared his stressful events with the players and in return got backhanded by a newspaper article questioning his decision making – a percieved kick me while I am down feeling. Spencer is the team spokesperson (the guy who was present at the player talks during the All Star break) and as such perhaps more discretion was expected. You don’t say things like Westphal did unless his feelings were hurt..
by betweentheeyes on Feb 25, 2010 12:03 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Does PW have the power to demand players not say negative things,
obviously yes,
With all the disaster control that he’s had to do in the press since this started, does he wish he had handled it differently, maybe.
To me this “he said she said” between Westphal and Spencer, is a smoke screen to avoid the real issue. At least 3 players on his team, talked to the press about players concerns about the rotations and consistent playing time. And, if 3 talked about it in public, I’m certain in my own mind that more than 3 feel that way.
So, Isn’t this the real problem? And does Westphal preceive it to be a problem? And, what if anything is Westphal planning to do about it? One thing is certain, he won’t be discussing it in public. So, I guess we’ll have to watch closely over these last 25 games, to see if anything changes with the rotations and PT. And, if anything changes will it make the team better.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
Well
The worst days of his life are because his wife is sick. He keeps going down to So Cal to be with her. Sounds pretty bad. So, he has that stress and clarified in the post practice interview that he meant that.
He also stated that there is a rule that the team don’t speak out in the media about their problems. The issue is that three players did and only one got penalized for it. I say there has to be more going on. Either Spencer and PW have been at odds and this is the straw that broke the camel’s back or worse happened.
They say they have not talked so it might be that Spencer and him just don’t get along. Either way I have an issue with any coach that chastises a player through the media and PW showed a real lack of professionalism by displaying the amount of angst in the press interview following the game. There is no worse thing than a poisonous lockerroom and it looks like that is happening now.
The post-practice interview didn’t help either because he basically brushed off the Evans comments as a 20 year old inexperienced thing, accepted May’s apology and then slammed Spencer who isn’t that much older and doesn’t seem as mature as Evans.
The whole thing is trouble for this team and PW is NOT handling it well at all. Ultimately, he is the mature and responsible adult amongst a bunch of kids. I would expect him to lead by example and he didn’t at all. I have little doubt that he lost a lot of respect and replaced with fear from his team and players.
I can be understanding about his wife’s illness and wish him the best while also acknowledging that he isn’t helping by serving as a coach who is too stressed to handle a situation like this better. He should take a leave of absence or something.
as he (Westphal) said in today's video
there are things that you (the media) just don’t know and won’t know.
Tyreke gets a pass because he is 20 and doesn’t know better – explained.
Sean May read the articile and immediately owned up and apologized – forgiven
Spencer is the team representative and has lots of media experience, no apology given – unacceptable.
I think that sums it up.
Tough year, the losing is grinding and he feels the team needs to stick together, not fraction off and spout off. You may not agree with his style but he made it clear he is ok with it – it is his authority to dispense playing time and complaiining in the press will not work. He feels that there is a lesson to be learned and chose this method to enforce that rule. I don’t get the impression he is uncomfortable or unhappy with the way it went down, maybe disappointed that there was a problem.
A leave of absence because he disciplined Spencer Hawes and some fans are unhappy? I don’t think that sends a very good team message. Maybe I misunderstand your point.
by betweentheeyes on Feb 25, 2010 1:20 AM PST up reply actions
Yes, there was a misunderstanding
He clearly is struggling with very difficult personal issues, his wife’s health. He should take the time off to be with her. Nobody would hold that against him.
My question
Why didn’t Hawes apologize for his comments like Sean May? This whole thing likely could’ve been avoided. The problem is likely that Hawes doesn’t feel like he did anything wrong, and that’s a dangerous precident to set. Westphal tried to nip that in the bud by disciplining Hawes. You can’t have your players not only criticizing the coach, but also feeling like that’s okay to do. THAT, in my opinion, is the main issue here. May knew he’d stepped over the line and apologized. Hawes either knew he stepped over the line and felt like that was okay, or didn’t know that his comments were over the line, neither of which are acceptable for a professional basketball player.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 25, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions
Yet
they were acceptable for the babe in the woods with a blueprint and a team of handlers Tyreke Evans.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
if this came across as confrontational
I didn’t mean it to be. I was going more for cynically hunorous.
Spencer definitely needs to show some maturity here too.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
I sincerely hope
Hawes goes to PW and apologizes and PW isn’t an ass about accepting it.
That would certainly be the right thing for Spencer to do now, let’s hope he does it.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
He may not have even read it.
Maybe his preferred reading is the Wall Street Journal or something.
I actually think that he was punished for something beyond the article.
I support PW weeding out the fringe/pseudo starters with these different rotations...
Is it too early to revisit and discuss that post a while back about
Spencer being the most overpaid in 2011? Found it….Ziller’s Aug 5th…
by getPGwithbounce on Feb 25, 2010 12:07 AM PST reply actions
PW is trying to establish some direction
Something this team hasn’t had in a looong time.
Spencer, judging from his interviews, has always seemed like a know it all.
Remember, PW was the only coach putting HIS hand up for the job. He must of seen something he liked here…..Plus with our new tough team, some experience and a few more pieces, who knows…
Right now where on the right track, but wrong train….but that’s rebuilding. Takes time.
My opinion on JT is that Rebounding is a Big aspect of Bball, and he goes hard at them boards, so without him or Brockman, who else is effectively gonna get more? Until Sac adds more BIG redentials to our front court, then he gets time, no matter how bad he plays.
Until we get a rotation that actually works, then keep expecting it to get changed. Players are suppose to be professional Basket ball players, not overpaid whinges. PW seems to me as professional, knowledgeable, and the right person for this team (right now at least).
Paul must love Chapu then.
Why else would he not have been traded?
"Oh, y ahora ¿quién podrá defenderme?" "¡Yo!"
I like Chapu.
I think that makes 4 Chapu fans now.
Gentlemen... BEHOLD!!!
by Wrath of Kyle on Feb 25, 2010 8:36 AM PST up reply actions
I think most questions were answered in the post practice interview yesterday
I love how the media was trying to provoke Spence in his post-practice interview. Damn vultures.
They were doing their job
Asking players and coaches about an ongoing problem is what they are paid to do. If they didn’t ask those questions people would be saying what lame reporters we have at the Bee.
It is fine to ask a question about the incident
if it is your desire to get information. It is quite a different thing to phrase a leading question that has no right answer for a story that has probably already been written.
How do you define good journalism then?
Just a bunch of softball questions that get no information beyond the spin control a team wants to put out?
velvet glove needed to complement iron fist
In my opinion, I think Westfall was right to bench Spence but now I think Westfall needs to show a velvet glove as the.complement to the iron fist before he loses his team. His players need to respect him in order to play well for him and while fear is a good motivator, fear and respect are even better
To do that, he should probably recognize that good communication is a 2-way street, that in this instance, he probably needed to realize that Spence may not intuitively know his role after a big trade which brings in another (small) big man and which has Thompson starting over him at center, even though that had been occuring already. Still, with Hawes’ immature ego and desire for minutes that far exceed his desire on defense, Westfall probably should have sat down with ALL the bigs (and donte) whose playing time and role would be affected by the trade and announce/explain his rotation plans going forward. I suspect that did not happen, in part because of his personal situation in soCal. If he had done that and spence still did what he did, then Spence fully deserves his benching. But I am guessing that did not happen since May also voiced his confusion. Still, while there may have been that mitigating circumstances for Spence, a rule is still a rule and Westfall was totally within his rights as the coach to enforce the rule and to make an example if necessary, and perhaps this one was necessary for more reasons than are readily apparent.
Now that the LAW has been imposed, that velvet glove needs to be shown – to win back or gain respect in the locker room. I hope that he will take the step of talking to the entire team, to explain his plans for them going forward, and to address some confidence and insecurity issues before they fester into something more, irreversibly.
Also, the team and the fans have got to realize that he is the best coach the Kings have had in at least three years. And I doubt that Adelman with his tight rotations and general relunctance to play rookies would have done any better (and would have cost a lot more to fail just as much if not more).
I thought a few weeks ago that PW needed to settle on a consistent rotation or else he will lose his team, but I also thought then that it is too bad that his players were not more consistent and reliable so that he could establish a consistent rotation. Alas, things have only gotten worse and the trade and lack of practice time has not helped.
At this point, the team needs a unifier, and the person to fill that role has to be the coach.
by dumbkingsfan on Feb 25, 2010 11:15 AM PST reply actions 6 recs
I agree about the velvet glove.
But I don’t really think PW has taken this beyond where he originally wanted it to go. I think he was attempting to demonstrate what happens when dissension is made public on such a fragile thing as a NBA team. Even more so when the team is so young as the Kings are.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
That sounds like a porn
The Velvet Glove and the Iron Fist, now in HD!
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 25, 2010 12:43 PM PST up reply actions
the classic review of the 1974 Stag's Leap Cellars Cask 23 Cabernet Sauvignon
that won the Battle of Bordeaux and allowed the Napa wines to be recognized or at least less ignored by the Old World.
(re: Iron fist in a velvet glove)
by betweentheeyes on Feb 25, 2010 12:59 PM PST up reply actions
actually, it was a 1973 stag's leap that took the prize
over a 1970 mouton rothschild and a 1970 haut brion. the most shocking thing was that 1973 was just considered to be an above average year in napa while 1970 was considered to be a very good vintage year in bordeaux.
perhaps that is where i remembered the phrase.
by dumbkingsfan on Feb 25, 2010 2:34 PM PST up reply actions
I've developed a greater interest in the Kings since the trade.
The one thing I’d say in this situation is that Westphal probably isn’t being a martinet. He might be inconsistent, but I’m not sure he’s wrong. An NBA team really only has three levers on its players – playing time, trades and from time to time, contracts. Trades are rare, but do happen as we’ve seen. Contracts are guaranteed, so if someone goes into a multi-year sulk, there’s not so much you can do about it.
The final and most immediate lever is playing time. Honestly this is why I think McGrady went on sabbatical until the trade. He started out by suiting up before the Rockets wanted to bring him back, later he complained about his minutes, and when he didn’t get what he wanted in that regard, he went away.
From the Rockets perspective this is entirely logical – you cannot, cannot, allow players to make playing time decisions for the coach, or he loses the one and only lever he has, beyond motivational speeches. To let the players think playing time is up for discussion just can’t be allowed, even if the player is right. Whether Westphal sent the right message, or sent it in a consistent way is another matter.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
by Xiane on Feb 25, 2010 11:58 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
make that "public discussion" - a private conversation about playing time is one thing, a media interview is another.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
You have more interest because of Landry?
Is that why you keep commenting in game threads Xiane? LOL
On a serious note, your point is all too true. I have a feeling this was more of a “nip in the bud” action and trying to get the point across to Spence than anything else.
As far as drama goes, this was pretty light. Most of the drama have come from the fans (including me) on this deal.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
I think the Kings are an interesting team anyway, with all the young players
but yes, I’m afflicted, I’ll watch former Rockets play, for a while anyway.
I think for a lot of Rockets fans Landry is kind of a special player – one of the first signs that the new regime really knew what it was doing after a fair amount of draft futility.
Also your game threads are snarky and sardonic in a way few teams manage, and being perverse, I like that.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
We are just a snarky sardonic bunch.
It’s who and what we are. It may be the best thing about StR.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
As I say, I'm a fan.
Also, I get to discuss nuclear power here. It’s one of my many, many, hobby-horses, so I’m grateful for that.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
Wherever Sims is, I shake my fist at you!
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Dreamshake will get there.
StR didn’t always 1200 comments on threads either. (Like last year.)
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
so let me get this straight
you like coming to this board because it has some opinionated smart ass perverts?
Welcome, brutha
by betweentheeyes on Feb 25, 2010 1:02 PM PST up reply actions
Or before there were some opinionated smart ass perverts.
The opinionated smart ass perverts just add another reason.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Yeah, these threads are getting pretty damn lengthy and crowded (insert twss here)
It’s so overwhelming I may have to abandon StR and start lurking around over at Evil Cowtown.
"If you told him to head-butt the wall, he would do it." -- Paul Westphal re: Brockness Monster.
by PhutureKings on Feb 25, 2010 2:40 PM PST up reply actions
Don't do that. You'll just find EC underwhelming in 2197.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
PW a good coach?
People keep saying that they believe that PW is the best coach the Kings have had in the last few years. I would like to know what his accomplishments are so far this year. The Kings have more individual talent now and yet the team is probably the worst team in the league. No defense (as in the past) and the offensive is non productive. Their shooting is awful, no passing game and it is generally a dribble, dribble oriented offense. I won’t even mention free throws. Just a bunch of guys standing around waiting for Tyreke to do something. Similar to a YMCA pickup game. Throw in the Hawes/PW mess and you’ve got an unhappy, unknowing bunch of young kids. PW has been arrogant a few times on post game interviews. (defending his 4flat offense and his teaching Hawes a lesson) The Hawes situation should have been handled in his office behind closed doors. What I am trying to point out that the Kings right now are a total mess, players are afraid of a mistake in the game and afraid to say anything outloud. Losses don’t bother me as much as watching how they play on the court. Completely screwed up……..
Probably the worst team in the league?
No. They are not the worst team in the league. You keep stating that and it keeps being untrue. The Nets & Wolves are the worst teams in the league BY FAR.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Bottom three
You may be right but the bottom three isn’t a good place to be. Also they did beat the Nets 109-96, but they split with the Wolves , won 120-100 and lost 96 to 112. They allowed the Wolves to break the century mark twice….I believe that was in Nov and Dec when they were playing better than they are now. They have until March 24 to prepare for the Nets again……
Listen up.
The Sonics drafted Kevin Durant AND Jeff Green. They won 20 games. The next year, probably because they had PJ Carleismo still, only won 23 games. Now the Thunder, this season, have won 33 games so far already. That’s a major improvement.
But to get where they wanted to go they had to suffer through a few miserable seasons. So, relax and enjoy the little things. You’ll see this team grow. This recent incident was clearly part of that. I’m hoping it doesn’t happen again, but we’ll see. The future is never guaranteed anything.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Let me second that.
Ask anyone five years ago if a team with Tracy McGrady and Yao Ming was destined for greatness and the answer would almost universally be “Yes!”.
All you can hope for is that you have a front office and coaching staff that are alert and making sound decisions based on solid preparation. Anything beyond that is up to the players, the rest of the league, and the basketball gods – just ask McGrady’s back and knees, and Yao’s feet.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
How anybody can argue that Tmac was a guy leading you to rings is beyond me....
…but apparently Carroll Dawson felt differently.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Oh no.
Let’s just let that one lie. Look again at McGrady’s early-mid 00s numbers. People forget how awesome he was. Besides, Houston got him for Francis and Mobley (mainly) just before Francis turned into a pumpkin.
Significant gravitas shortfall expected in 2010.
Stevie Franchise was always a pumpkin
Cat Mobley was alright and I think helped him straighten out and fly right for a bit but he never learned how to turn into a chariot
Reminds of Ty Thomas but with much more realized potential. He (Francis) is one of the reasons the CBA has been and will again be renegotiated.
by betweentheeyes on Feb 25, 2010 1:06 PM PST up reply actions
Oh I remember how good he was. Just never thought he was good enough to lead a team to rings. After the 1st round debacle against Dallas, my feelings were completely cemented?
Talented? No question. But, talented in ways that make you a championship contender? IMO, no.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
And I have no problem with why you may disagree. Your pregorative as it is mine. :)
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Ok Pookey
I’m listening up and somewhat believe in what you are saying. Our heyday is a few years off due to the young age of our players. I just hope that management doesn’t trade a few players without giving them time to develop. I also hope they don’t screw them up brainwise. Evans is a future star. Hawes will develop into a good 5 if allowed. (such as Bogut). I’m just not sure PW is the man to lead with his sometimes uppity attitude. At this point I don’t want to see a another coach change. We’ve had too many already and too much player shuffle to develop into a playoff team…….We need time. My problem is I don’t have too much time left to see the results………I’m getting older and watching the Kings increases my age with each game…..
Hawes is not like Bogut. Nowhere close. So let's not walk down that road.
Bill, unless you’re 75+ or have a major condition that may see you not live tomorrow, I’m not really swayed by that argument. (There are also others with physical ailments on this site. I wish it weren’t so, but that doesn’t make the reality any less.)
Having said that, trading Kevin Martin is not necessarily a sign that they were going to change the core. I wouldn’t be shocked one bit to see Hawes or JT traded over the summer for an upgrade at the 4/5 along with another player drafted to help the team more up front.
The fact is that you build a team full of assets and then you go out trying to find what you need to make your team better without your team falling back. When the Kings have won 17 games, there is nowhere to go but up. Yes it hasn’t been pretty lately, but this team showed glimpses in Nov & Dec. I’m more curious to see how this transpires given that than I was about the actual winning. There’s a lot going on with this franchise and I want to see how it turns out. (Also, being 30 maybe I can afford to be practical here. But, there are others quite a bit older with the same expectations. So….?)
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Age?
Well Pookey, I fit in the above catagory. 76 today. I said the “not much time left” with tongue in cheek. I do expect to see the Kings rise again. I have played BB most of my life. High school, college and later just plain old league ball. I have coached little guys and big guys. I admit I am no expert just a little experienced. My problem with the present day Kings is not how many games they lose but how they go about losing them. Most of the best games they played, they lost, but I was appreciative of how they played. Lately, they are completely disoriented on the floor. Same players different game. Why? I blame the coaching staff…….I hope you are wrong about Hawes. He is only 21 and has a lot of ability. Just time to develop…….Bill
Well at the very least you've lived to see 76. I hope I'll do the same.
I have no problem with being frustrated with the losing Bill. I get that. I really do. But at the same time young teams do that. I don’t think the coaching staff is really to blame, and I’m not sure the players are either. I just think it’s one of the things you commit to when blowing up a roster and re-stocking it with youth. There are growing pains, and many of them are exactly what you dislike most Bill.
And, with all due respect to your playing experience (which is more than I can say for myself), I would believe that unless you’re a former NBA player and/or coach, I don’t think people realize how hard it is to win (in general—not you specifically) a NBA game. These guys are all very very very good basketball players. Many of them the best to ever play where they grew up when they were still amateurs.
I’m not thrilled with the recent disorientation of the team, but I’m willing to see what’s beyond door #1 or door #2 to speak. There is time with this team to see what happens. In fact, and I know this will be a heresy of sorts, I think it will aid the team more in it’s development as opposed to the first 2 months which only aided to the belief that all it takes to win is effort in the NBA. It takes a hell of a lot more than that, and when these young kids realize that (and a set rotation comes into place—there are so many problems with this team I’m not sure which solution comes first—if I had to guess PW will take whichever solution appears first) this team will improve. When or how, or even if, that happens? I have no clue. It would take a great deal of foresight (not one of my better qualities) to tell you that.
As far as Hawes not being Bogut, I might like to point something out. Most top big men in the NBA are top 5 picks. In fact, I’m trying to remember All-Star studs not being the top pick or one of the top 5 picks. Charles Barkley is one big man of high quality, and he was the 5th pick overall in 1984. Bill Russell was picked 2nd overall (I won’t include Wilt cuz he was a territorial pick and that system ended in 1965), Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 1 overall, Bill Walton 1 overall, Hakeem Olajuwon 1 overall, Kevin McHale 3rd overall, Shaq O’Neal 1st overlal, Alonzo Mourning 2nd overall, Chris Webber 1st overall, Tim Duncan 1st overall, David Robinson 1st overall, Pau Gasol 3rd overall, Yao Ming 1st overall, Dwight Howard 1st overall, Chris Bosh 4th overall. Andrew Bogut? 1st overall. (I also know of the exceptions too like Amare Stoudemire—9th overall in 2002—same year as Yao Ming. But there aren’t many. Which is my point. And Spencer Hawes never had the body Amare has had. Never will.)
I hope I’ve made my point about the best big men going very very high in the draft without fail. It’s because they are so so so so so valuable.
Glad you’ve joined StR Bill. You clearly care about the team and have thoughts to share.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
by pookeyguru on Feb 25, 2010 1:49 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I dunno pookey
Looking at the whole body of work, you are probably right. But right now, I’m not 100% sure they could eat either of those teams in Arco.
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
At this moment
I might take Kansas over our guys, but it will get better.
I think.
What we've got here is, failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach.
You take Kansas. I'll take my Baby Royals.
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I'm not sure Donald Sterling is a human being. He had to have been manufactured by someone, possibly David Stern, so that one team could solely just make profit for the NBA while doing nothing good for themselves. -- Aykis 16
Oliver Miller could eat them
I’m not 100% sure they could eat either of those teams in Arco.
"custer’s battle plan at little big horn was more coordinated than deandre jordan" ~ lchristmas
by CaliforniaJag on Feb 25, 2010 12:55 PM PST up reply actions
Tractor Traylor, John "Hot Plate" Williams, Oliver Miller, Sean May, Charles Barkley
are the Joey Chestnut and Kobayashi’s of the NBA. They are the Dream Team and could eat any team in the world
by betweentheeyes on Feb 25, 2010 1:09 PM PST up reply actions
Whoops!
“Preview” is my friend eh?
"You know what I consider mentally weak? Using your audience to settle a grudge with someone who had the audacity to publicly call you on your sh*t. The only thing more offensive is that Napear thinks we're all too stupid to see it for what it is." - TZ, Sactown Royalty
thought Terry Porter was coaching somewhere
What’s he doing with the journo crew in the photo up top?
Life is every mammal's journey from very very wet to very very dry.

by 




















