Poll of the Indeterminate Time Period
3 recs |
561 comments
Comments
I'm writing this comment to say
I have no comment.
by Ziller on Feb 6, 2010 8:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why do I think you know more than you are letting on
Wait....Why is everybody clapping? Everyone around me is clapping.... I guess I should be clapping too... GO LAKERS!!! I hate living in So Cal
by 27freethrows on Feb 6, 2010 10:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Or you won't say.
But if you had heard rumors more or less likely than you would say so. I believe you, but only halfway.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And now I believe for the record Marc Stein's statement started this.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 10:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why not do this?
Iggy is a better all-around player than Kevin Martin. We can’t sign sign any big name players like him as free agents. I don’t think he’s the ideal fit next the Tyreke being that he can’t shoot the long ball, but they’d figure it out. Sam’s contract doesn’t last that long and he’s a perfect fit for what we need.
The only reason not to do this is because it gives us a worse shot at John Wall. Just kidding – the contracts are a major reason not to do this – puts us in a riskier situation. But Andre is a killer player and I don’t see why you wouldn’t take a shot at this trade. Just keep Sergio out of it if possible.
Also – anyone have input on who is our SF of the future? Donte is playing really well lately. And I’m a huge fan of Casspi, so I’m split. Luckily they’re both versatile.
by KeonClark on Feb 6, 2010 11:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Would rather keep sergio and throw in another expiring deal.
If that is all he is there for. But taking on two players from the 76ers starting lineup on a team that just isn’t very good seems odd. But we could do worse.
Hope
by Ultrakingsfan on Feb 6, 2010 8:30 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Two defensive minded players never hurt though.
but I still don’t understand why philly is trading their best player.
Hope
by Ultrakingsfan on Feb 6, 2010 8:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Personally, no.
I’d like to see Petrie take the approach that Presti took with Durant (surrounding him with players his age that will develop with him) with Tyreke. Even if it takes another sub 500 season. I think we just need to turn those guys into young prospects like Speights or possibly draft picks.
by sdfd on Feb 6, 2010 8:30 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
I disagree...
with your statement:
Even if it takes another sub 500 season.
The players need to experience some wins. Continuing in this vein of losses is not going to bode well with their ongoing development. Ask yourself, if you were in the shoes of one of these players, how would feel right now, losing? There is nothing like a few wins to pump up the spirit and confidence of a team. A win is reinforcement for a job well done.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 10:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You are wildly optimistic
if you think next year we’ll be above .500
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 10:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if Igoudala and Dalembert don't get the Kings to .500 next year
then don’t do the deal. I think they would though.
by Pollard4LIfe on Feb 6, 2010 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you have to ask if they get you to the playoffs. I'm not sure they do.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 11:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No shot for playoffs
But could certinainly flirt with .500. I’m making the assumption that the young guns develop in some quantifiable way.
Screw you Knicks! LBJ to the Kings!!!
by Shizzo on Feb 6, 2010 2:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You either need extra revenue from the playoffs or a high draft pick. None if this in-between mediocre hell we were stuck with for 3 years.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 2:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah whatever one spreads the court so Iggy and Reke have driving lanes
by MJ5 on Feb 6, 2010 3:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
after that I would trade Francisco for spare parts
or trade Nocioni to Boston for Scalabrine, marquis daniels, and jr giddens in order to free up minutes for Donte Green, Omri Caspi, and ime Udoka. I think if Ime was given Nocioni’s minutes he could produce similarily. Also it would indirectly free up minutes for Beno and Sergio. So if we could get Iggy we would have to good passers and guys who can defend. We would also have Iggy and Reke driving to the rim, Omri and Spencer spreading the court and Dalembert getting offensive rebounds, setting picks, and getting putbacks
by MJ5 on Feb 6, 2010 4:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am certainly hoping that next year we will be playing for a playoff spot.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 4:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You may be setting yourself up for dissapointment
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 4:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You almost definitely are
While I’d be thrilled to see the Kings advance that quickly, hope is much to strong of a word for a team that will be VERY luck to win 30 games this year. It’s actually easier in my opinion to go from 17-30 than it is to go from 30 to the probably 50 wins that it would take to make the playoffs next year in the west. You have to ask yourself what teams we are going to leapfrog over.
"And I never said I don’t like KMart. I just don’t think the duo is good for the team. They are essentially two of the same player"
Sammyp831.
by SavageBeast on Feb 6, 2010 4:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If we win 30 games this year
then 40-41 next year is not unreasonable.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Which would be a great improvement
But would not be enough to get into the playoffs. Last year, the 8th team had 48 wins.
"And I never said I don’t like KMart. I just don’t think the duo is good for the team. They are essentially two of the same player"
Sammyp831.
by SavageBeast on Feb 6, 2010 5:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am assuming that we are going to get one or more defensive pieces before next season.
I am also assuming that the experience the guys get this year is going to make a substantial difference in their play next year. Perhaps I am setting myself up for disappointment, but I believe it is possible. They are a bright and talented young group who have received a lot of experience this season.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 5:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dalmbert and Iggy are the defensive pieces
and Tyreke and all the young guys are going to improve. They will get stronger, improve their offensive game, and improve their defensive. They will also be better because they will be used to NBA’s style of play and have experience.
by MJ5 on Feb 6, 2010 5:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly!
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So you think we can win at least 45 games next season?
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
personally i think that unless shock and hawes make huge leaps next year, the kings are two years away...
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know it depends on the development of the young guys
I totally expect Reke to get very good very soon and become one of the superstars of the league. But the guys around him have to help him out. All of them have to be consistent. Omri has to be able to drop the three when called on. Spencer and JT need to be efficient inside scorers and rebounders. The young guys need to improve. I think the Kings are 2 years away also. But with a young team, anything is possible. The Kings have shown flashes of brillance.
by MJ5 on Feb 6, 2010 5:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Haws making a huge leap..now thats funny
Judgment day is coming!
by Widowwolf on Feb 6, 2010 9:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think that we will be competitive for a playoff spot.
Our offense is fine now and will only improve. This season, the guys have just been thrown in together with a variety of lineups. They are going to know each other much better next season . The biggest problem has been our defense. I am assuming in my expectations, this will be corrected with some better players for defense.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 5:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well they better get used to the variety of lineups... westphal aint going anywhere.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That is my point.
They will be used to the variety of lineups, which is why they are only going to improve. They are going to get to know each other very well.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 5:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not to be an asshole SD
but you didn’t answer my question, do you expect this team to win 45 next year?
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I expect them to be around the .500 mark next season
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 5:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
are they realigning? because that still wont sniff the playoffs in the west
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That is next season, not this season.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 5:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That doesn't get you in the playoffs in the west though
Though it’s waaay too early to start thinking about nnext year, the normal progress of a young team would suggest we’d be between 35-40. That’d be awesome in my opinion
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Remember when we got Ron Artest?
The team sucked. We didn’t think that we would make a playoff spot when we got him. But we did.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 5:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We also had an established veteran team
with a veteran coach that had made the playoffs the previous year. Different time, different team
I see very few players making us a playoff team next year, and I don’t see any of them coming to Sac.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if this were fantasy land...
there are at least 20 players who if they came to the kings without the kings giving anything up in return would make them a playoff team
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We will just have to wait and see what the trade will bring.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 5:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ron Artest stayed here in Sacramento.
He was traded away, but he was hoping that the Maloofs would offer him a contract to stay. There are a lot of perks for some people to come to California.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 5:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You would have signed Artest to an extension?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ha - No way!
Way too much drama. But, one heck of a defender.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 7:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He was great individually at times.
The Kings just weren’t that good of a defensive team with him.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 8:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Part of it was because he was so busy trying to develop his offensive game.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 11:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't mean coming to Sacramento
to imply that they wouldn’t come because of the city. I meant I don’t see Bron, Wade, Bosh, and others coming here.
Those type of players will probably not come to play for the Kings and make them a playoff contender next year,
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 6:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I know what you meant.
To attract really good players, they want to be on a team that will put them into the playoffs, at the least, and contenders for a championship, at the best.
No, we won’t attract LeBron, Wade, or Bosh.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 7:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i doubt there was one too.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If we could unload noc and beno in other deals
I would be down. Assuming we keep sergio.
Hope
by Ultrakingsfan on Feb 6, 2010 8:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I vote no
I like Iggy and Dalembert, and I am not opposed to trading KMart, but I don’t think this trade does much for us beyond next season, and it might hurt the rebuilding process. I dont think that replacing Martin with Iggy does much to improve the team overall, but I could be underestimating Iggy’s impact on D.
The addition of Dalembert would be significant, but would only be thru next year. And it might make us good enough just to not get good draft picks and hamper the rebuild. If we could somehow get rid of Noc in the deal, I’d do it, but that doesn’t work.
by DustyG on Feb 6, 2010 8:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Whats not to like
The Kings add a great athletic wing who is a good defender and a great passer.
They add the defensive big they need in Dalembert who not only is a terrific defender, but also is a great rebounder.
Reke
Iggy
Omri You get rid of a horrible defender and add two good defenders
JT
Dalembert
by MJ5 on Feb 6, 2010 12:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd vote to start Spencer with Dalembert
Spencer’s offensive production and shooting threat will balance Dalembert’s nothingness on that end of the floor. Hell, Spence might even produce 2 dunks for Dalembert off of slick passes. Right now, I fear JT being on the floor. The guy just looks terrrrrible on offense and defense right now, except for rebounding spurts.
And Iggy + Reke = best defensive backcourt in the league, NO DOUBT.
Screw you Knicks! LBJ to the Kings!!!
by Shizzo on Feb 6, 2010 2:23 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
MJ5-
I do think that the trade would make the Kings better for the next season and a half, but I’m not sure I want that. But as I mentioned it above, I think that the rebuild is still in progress (probably two more lottery picks to go…) and to become mediocre for two years in the middle of the rebuild might just render it ineffective (our young talent won’t be so young anymore, and they will cost more money to keep around, and we will lose that consolidation of talent that I feel is so important to making special teams).
Additionally, it would be nearly $40 million (by my calcs) in ADDITIONAL salary commitment over the next five and a half years.
I think that you are right that the team would be instantly better for the move, but worse off in the long run (3-5 years).
by DustyG on Feb 6, 2010 4:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
keep Sergio
what is wrong with Martin?
Donte on the other hand, is playing great. He plays smart, which is incredible given how he played last year.
by KeonClark on Feb 6, 2010 8:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't that great of Donte last night?
He is a keeper and so is Sergio.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 4:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I voted no
but not because I thought we weren’t getting a fair return. I think what we’re getting back in more than fair, but I’m not sold on Iguodala and I’d rather have flexibility over the next two years salary wise and see what happens.
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 8:53 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
i voted yes but i was very close to going with your logic here.
i dunno if there is a right answer on this one. Whether or not we trade Martin, we are still losing this year.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 10:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but i loooove me some iggy. always have and always will.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 10:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ut Dalembert expires after next season so then we have salary flexibility then!
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 10:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
only if you don't resign him
and you have nothing basically for this trade deadline, this summer or next trade deadline, other than Dalelbert’s expiring deal, which again sort of kills the reason to get him.
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 11:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent poll question
I was very torn, and could easily be swayed either way. My initial reaction was that I probably would pull the trigger, but I’m already second-guessing myself.
My biggest questions comes from the fact that I haven’t watched enough of Iguodala, so I don’t know how he gets his points. My perception is that he’s more of a slasher. If his game is too similar to Tyreke’s I would be less inclined to go for it.
I look forward to the discussion this generates.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Feb 6, 2010 8:55 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
How's about we start running the offense through Spence in the High post
and he’s got two excellent slashers to pass to who can finish at the rim. Mucho assists for Spence, mucho “and 1s” for ‘Reke and Iggy. I’m just saying, talent is talent, so I’m really not too worried about Iggy (or anyone else) fitting in with ‘Reke. I think he’ll get his points, and his backcourt mate will have his chance to get his points too. Martin would be getting plenty of points right now if he was making his shots.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 9:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I voted yes as well
But had to think about it for a bit.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 1:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Iggy is a well rounded offensive player (contrary to popular perception)
2 years ago, he had no consistent jump shot what so ever, and his form didn’t look too nice either. He would lean back very often and sometimes be floating backwards as well, which killed his consistency. But this year it seems he’s really worked on it over the summer. His jump shot is pretty darn effective. His 3pt% doesn’t look too good, but that’s cause he never gets open looks generated for him. Instead, he’s generating the looks for others. And many of his 3pt attempts are the end-of-shot-clock variety. I think he’d be a solid 40+% 3pt shooter if he had open looks like the ones Reke produces for our guys.
And its’ well documented he’s a ferocious slasher, has good handles, and is a darn good passer. Players extremely unselfishly often times getting passes to Dalembert, Louis, and Thaddeus that I never expect him to see or be able to make.
Screw you Knicks! LBJ to the Kings!!!
by Shizzo on Feb 6, 2010 2:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Question
Is this a valid rumor or just wishful thinking? Voted yes btw.
by kingme on Feb 6, 2010 9:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I love me my K-Mart
and I must confess I’ve never seen either Iggy or Dalembert play – but this is a tempting offer.
Iggy is a poor man’s KMart on offense – but looks as if he makes up for it on the rebounding/defensive end. Along with Reke, Dalembert and Iggy could perhaps make up for the defensive and rebounding liabilities of JT.
The trade appears to address all our weaknesses, so I voted yes.
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
by thelettere on Feb 6, 2010 9:07 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Iggy and Martin
have somewhat different offensive games. Iggy’s perimeter game is not nearly as good, he relies more on his athleticism than KMart. Which isn’t to say that KMart isn’t athletic, only that they use it in different ways.
by sactown on Feb 6, 2010 9:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, Iggy is built like a tank.
"Thou must give props" - Ice_9ine
by tomroadrunner on Feb 6, 2010 9:53 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks
I’m gonna make a point to watch a few sixers games to get some more exposure.
"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken
by thelettere on Feb 6, 2010 2:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
iggy is all kinds of fun to watch play
dunks galore. very solid man on man defense but takes some very questionable shots. not a great shooter though
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 10:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wait a second...
So is Evans/Iggy a good pairing, but Evans/Wall isn’t? I’m not directing this at anyone in particular, but I thought the reasons that certain people gave for why Evans/Martin is a better pairing than Evans/Wall would also be the same reasons why Evans/Iggy wouldn’t work out.
In other words, Tyreke likes to go to the basket so we need a good perimeter shooter like Kevin, right?
by getPGwithbounce on Feb 6, 2010 11:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i actually think that the people who are big propoents of saying no to iggy are the same people who were proponents of saying no to wall
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 11:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not necessarily
At least on my case. I understand how John Wall and Reke wouldn’t work but because they would both be rookie and sophmore, respectively, I’d give it a shot. It is a bit of the same situation in terms of styles of play but the $$ is the deal breaker in a way. That’s the biggest difference
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 7, 2010 2:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
keep sergio
Great trade, but replace Rodriguez with Nocioni. Run Iguodala, Evans, Dalembert, Thompson and Greene. Casspi’s your sixth man. This is a pretty solid core. Next, through in a high draft pick, and a free agent or two. The Kings future would definitely start looking up.
by deepnu666 on Feb 6, 2010 9:09 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sixers wouldn't want Nocioni
Father of the "Natt this!" movement, Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order, and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
by Aykis16 on Feb 6, 2010 10:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If we take a semi-questionable contract back, they could be open to it.
I’m sayin that becaues they are STARVING for 3pt production. Especially that classic “stretch 4”. Thaddeus does a good impersonation but he doesn’t have that physicality that Noc has to guard PFs.
Screw you Knicks! LBJ to the Kings!!!
by Shizzo on Feb 6, 2010 2:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dalembert is easily classified as semi-questionable.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 2:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No
Not quite yet; however, if this team can’t show some kind of marked improvement (at least playing up their admittedly low potential) by the end of this season KMart is fair game for any trading situatio, IMHO.
by batso on Feb 6, 2010 9:10 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I say no
I am a huge fan of Iggy’s game but I wouldnt yet. If nothing improves by the summer then maybe. I will admit I didnt expect the team to do much better than this for the season so I probably am more patient.
by Hilton on Feb 6, 2010 9:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Iguodala is a better player than Martin
But I would actually vote no. We would be swapping for better defense and rebounding, but would be a huge loss on perimeter shooting. Iguodala’s 31% from 3 will make it very easy for opposing teams to pack the lane, doing neither Iggy nor Tyreke any good. I just don’t see Tyreke and Igg coexisting well, w/o major 3pt threats at the 3 and 4.
by sactown on Feb 6, 2010 9:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
You could spread the floor
With casspi at the three and Donte at the four.
by Doors Open on Feb 6, 2010 9:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Donte’s 3pt shooting is not where it needs to be for that to be effective strategy. Donte’s current game is most effective when he slashes, much like Iggy and Reke.
by sactown on Feb 6, 2010 9:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Unlike a lot of 4's
He has to be guarded out to the three point line. Who cares what he’s most effective at. He has the ability to stretch the D.
by Doors Open on Feb 6, 2010 9:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
Until he proves that he can consistently shoot the 3, teams will always leave him to help low.
by sactown on Feb 6, 2010 9:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great
Donte would be a great 3-pt shooter with nobody guarding him. Plus, casspi and hawes on the floor with tyreke range increasing game by game. I’m looking into the future
by Doors Open on Feb 6, 2010 9:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Am I the only one who thinkd Donte at the 4 won't work consistently
Guys don’t change their rebounding stripes…sometimes there is little improvement but never great improvement. If you consistently put Hawes and Donte out there at the 4 and 5 for 60 minutes, you would get 12 RBs. I think he is a 2 who can play situational 4.
by ElRonToro on Feb 6, 2010 9:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Donte may be somewhat like Josh Smith.
Much less of a shotblocker, but with more range on his shot. e could possibly fill a role like that, but I do not know how likely it is to try and have him play the 4 full-time.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 9:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree teams could pack the lane
…but right now the 76ers don’t seem to have any shooters at all, and Iggy still gets his. I’d wonder if the sprinkling of Casspi/Beno/Noce onto the floor might open things up even more for Iguodala
by sactoreg on Feb 6, 2010 9:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hadn't thought about that
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 10:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hoopshype says
the sixers are considering a trade with the Suns for Amare and Barbosa. It would really surprise me if they are interested in anything the Kings could offer.
by KingsFan on Feb 6, 2010 9:17 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
That's risky for them...
Amar’e might stay next year and they would be in trouble
by Doors Open on Feb 6, 2010 9:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The one thing going for the Kings right now, with Martin, is that he has a very reasonable contract for a player of his caliber. Once he hits his stride, he will be a very tradeable asset. Not that I want to see him go, I think this entire circus is ridiculous.
by sactown on Feb 6, 2010 9:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No
I’m extremely leery of committing that kind of money for that length of time to Iguodala. Dalembert’s contract expires after next season, right? Then what? Commit big $$$ to him as well?
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
by outrider on Feb 6, 2010 9:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why?
Iguodala just turned 26.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 1:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
His age doesn't bother me
For 2010-2013 we’d be paying about 2 mil a year more for Iggy with the likelihood of having to pay him almost 16 mil for 13-14 (Martin expires after 12-13; Iggy has an ETO for 13-14). So, does taking on a bigger, longer contract hinder us from making any moves along the way? And what of Dalembert when he expires after next year?
My knowledge of the salary cap is basic at best, but in Iggy’s case it seems like we’d be committing more $$$ for perhaps a somewhat better player. And assuming we did want to resign Dalembert, what could we resign him for? I don’t think that dude is worth 13 mil a year…
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
by outrider on Feb 6, 2010 2:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So we have a younger, better, more durable player for more moeny
and we resign Dalembert for a much smaller deal maybe 5-6 million. If he will not take it then he goes elsewhere or is traded. He is a better played than Kenny Thomas and a larger expiring contract next season than K9 is this season. So we get 2 better players for more money than the main components we are trading away.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 2:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Are the Maloofs willing to spend additional $$$
for the shorter term (Dalembert) and the longer term (Iggy)?
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
by outrider on Feb 6, 2010 2:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget
That Dalembert, even as an expiring…is still an asset.
I seriously doubt he’s getting $13 million per year after his contract expires.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 2:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd lean towards yes
Because the thought of having perimeter defense in the form of Evans (especially once his defense ratchets up to his physical potential), Iggy, and Donte makes me a bit giddy. I’d miss Martin’s offense, but Iguodala is no slouch in that department either…posting a fairly consistent 19-5-5 line for numerous years.
We talk about how the Evans/Martin pairing could potentially be the one of the best backcourts in the NBA, and I agree, though that’s mostly considering the offensive output they could bring. As Evans defense improves, I’d believe an Evans/Iguodala combo could also be one of the best backcourts in the league, offensively and defensively.
by sactoreg on Feb 6, 2010 9:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I have been pro this trade for a while.
I think the real question is if PHi is desperate to get out from under those salaries then maybe we can get them to give us a first rounder. We could also include Armstrong with Rodriguez, or just Armstrong and not Rodriguez. The Kings after this trade would remind me a bit of Toronto when they first got Vince Carter and had some vets in Charles Oakley and Antonio Davis and they became a team that made noise in the playoffs before TMac left and Vince went into operation shutdown.
According to Dean Oliver Iguodala has created the most wins of ANY shooting guard at the midpoint of this season. Also if he struggles offensively he still can rebound, pass, and defend. If Kevin struggles
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 9:32 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
darn accidentaly click on laptop touch pad!
If Kevin struggles offensively we get almost nothing out of him. I really like Kevin, but Iguodala is younger, more versatile, and more durable. And the trade nets us a decent third big.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 9:34 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
disable the touchpad clicker. I do that on all touchpads I work with. I hate that tap to click feature that always clicks when you don’t want it to. Can cause a major problem in my line.
by KingsFan on Feb 6, 2010 9:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tempted
to rec you for that last sentence fragment.
by sactown on Feb 6, 2010 9:35 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
If GP really wanted to
trade KMart, this is the deal I’d want. Iggy is averaging 17-6-5 right now. Add in Sammy, who can get you double digit rebounds on any night. Talent wise, I think that’s the deal we should go for.
But I’m still not on the ‘trade Martin’ bandwagon yet. I think it’s too early.
by what_the_crap on Feb 6, 2010 9:51 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you.
If he goes I want this deal, but I do not think he needs to be traded.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 11:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Try not to think of it though as a question of whether or not Martin "needs" to be traded
but rather a question of whether or not this team needs a different mix of players, and whether or not Martin is the guy to trade to get those players. I’m leaning towards yes right now.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 11:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not so sure
Funny thing is, just this morning, before reading this trade poll, I saw Iguodala’s statline from last night (14 pts., 9 reb., 7 ast., 1 to., 1 stl., 1 blk.) and thought…this is a guy who -if not scoring/shooting well, can do plenty of other things. Unlike Martin, as mayfield stated above. I also thought about Iguodala and Tyreke coexisting, and because they both bring it in so many different areas every night, I started dreaming about 2 backcourt players getting triple doubles together.
I came straight to the computer and trade machined Martin, Armstrong, May/Udoka for Iggy and Jason Smith. Smith is someone I liked when he was drafted (7’, 240; 23 yrs old; 12 pts., 9 reb., 2 blk. per 40 min in NBA so far; 2 yrs @ $1.4) but I’m not sure what happened to him besides an ankle/knee? injury last year. I haven’t looked into what’s going on with him now. The reason I was think about him instead of Dalembert is the contracts. So it would basically be Martin 4 @ $10m for Iggy 5 @ $12m with a tryout for a young big (if he’s cleared to play) until the draft.
After all that, I voted yes.
by busybe on Feb 6, 2010 10:08 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
nope
I don’t see how taking 40% of the starting line up of a team worse than us makes us better, especially when both players are overpaid.
by longtimelistenerfirsttimecaller on Feb 6, 2010 10:20 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Dalembert becomes a bench player so it is not exactly a fair comparison.
And we get their best player for our second best player.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 11:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I have said it before and I will say it again
Nobody gets Kevin unless a first round pick sent back.
Following that principle, I trade Kevin and Hilton for Dalembert and a first rounder.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 10:23 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
No Iggy! Lottery pick!
We are still rebuilding people. Let’s not rush the job.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 10:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Iggy 25
That doesn’t qualify as rebuilding? How is that rushing. Do not understand your logic here. Keep your 25 year old, former allstar, who does a little bit of everything and we will keep K-Mart who is older and not as good
by Doors Open on Feb 6, 2010 10:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
See pookey's comment right below.
And then think about drafting Hassan Whiteside and Xavier Henry instead.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 10:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Xavier Henry (a pick) for Kmart is not fair.
Iggy is WAY better than Henry as well.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, bad example.
Iguodala just seems like Shawn Marion lite to me. I would rather take my chances with Petrie and 2 draft picks than Iggy and just 1.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 11:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What if you had a chance to get Derrick Favors and Evan Turner?
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Omri Casspi and Donte Greene aren't enough for you huh?
You must have 6 All-Stars at every position to compete in the NBA < / sarcasm >
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
nowadays... yeah.
GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
by iashwash on Feb 6, 2010 4:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How about this
If coach Westphal could convince me that we’re as terrible as we are defensively only because we need more practice time, or his schemes aren’t working, or in some other way takes responsibility on himself and his coaching staff, then I’d be willing to be patient with Martin and everyone else to see if this group of guys could become a decent defensive team. But to my eyes, this team plays terrible defense because too many of these players don’t know how to play team defense. Youth and inexperience can be largely to blame for that, but the most effective and sure-fire way to fix it is by getting better defensive players.
I think this trade would leave us with more than enough offensive firepower to still win games, and leave us enough of a good young core that I wouldn’t be at all worried about derailing the rebuild. In Petrie we trust, after all. I say do it.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 10:25 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Listening to Westphal with Grant and the Mike yesterday...
Westphal pointed to the Kings defensive woes as a lack of experience and a lack of effort but he was very clear to point out that it was too early to really tell which of these lables he could attach to individual players. I thought it was an intersting listen, Westphal is very charming and I think a lot of people miss some of his more poinient statements and Grant/Mike are too weak sauce to ask follow ups. I’m not sure that I agree with your statement that “the most effective and sure-fire way to fix it is by getting better defensive players”- the Kings are VERY young and it is possible that the most effective and sure-fire way to fix the current issue with defense is to allow this team to grow into a unit together while adding more pieces through the draft/low level free agency.
A rush to aquire defensive minded players usually means that you give up offensive players to do so. So in a sense, you end up trading one issue for another. While I would hate to see Martin go, this particular trade is very intriguing to me because Iggy is a very good two way player which is something that has become extremely rare int he NBA. I also see Iggy as a guy who doesn’t need the ball as much as Martin. On the season (and looking at last season as well)- Martin averages about 16.1 (15.9 last yr) shots a game and an additional 7.1 free throw attempts (10.3 last yr) while Iguodala shoots 14.3 shots and 5 free throw attempts. While Martin is a superior scorer, Iguodala is a far superior distributor.
The reason I bring these numbers up is because I see the Kings becoming more of a well rounded scoring team in the absence of Martin with Evans leading the way and a group of 5 or 6 secondary double digit scorers flanking him. If you add Martin and his 23.2 collective shots to Evans, there is really a lack of offensive opportunites for other players. Iguodala would provide better defense, better ball movement and better durability (missed only 6 games out of 459)- overall, Iggy would be a more complete “team” player.
So a long winded response to your post is this, I don’t neccessarily agree with your assumption that aquiring better defensive players is the quickest/sure-fire way to become a better defensive team. I do agree that Iguodala is probably a very good way to accomplish both defensive improvement and offensive balance while staying young.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 11:50 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I still don't like this idea, but this is the best and most complete argument so far for it.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 12:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ice-
I understand that you want to load up in this years draft. Maybe you have fallen in love with a few players a little too much, maybe you believe that a team with an average age of 20 can win a championship but I think you have to look at this a little more objectively.
The Kings have a ton of youth and if they are able to ship out Noc and K-9 they get even younger. This off-season the Kings should have a pick that lands somewhere between #1 and #10- that player should be a solid to good pro to complement the already growing number of young solid to good pros that Geoff Petrie has already assembled. Add to this that Iguodala is a year younger than Martin, tougher than Martin and locked up for a long time.
So let’s dispell a few other objections here-
With Martin gone, the defense will be able to collapse on Evans argument.
Answer: Omri Casspi and wait for it….Francisco Garcia. Most of us believe that Noc will be shipped out at the deadline. With the newly immerging Donte “I can play power forward” Greene, the three position is about to primarily played by guys who can stretch the defense in Casspi, Garcia and Udoka. Spencer Hawes also helps with this issue but the real answer is deep shooting small forwards.
But Martin is our best player and the fans love him argument:
Answer: Kevin Martin has missed 84 games over the last 2 1/2 seasons. The fans are coming out to watch Kevin Martin’s back-up 40% of the time. I have yet to see a combo Kevin Martin/Beno Udrih/Francisco Garcia jersey, but I think there would be a lot of money in said jersey.
How do we replace Kevin Martin’s scoring argument.
Answer: Garcia, Iguodala and the maturation of Casspi, Greene, Thompson and Evans.
But Kevin is the leader of this team argument:
Answer: The sound of silence.
I love Kevin Martin, but if the Kings can take similar contracts (Martin and Iggy), add a shot blocking presence, get slightly younger, open up more shots for the amazing young talent already in place, improve defensively, improve rebounding, get tougher…………
I’m a Kings fan first. Players come and go. Martin’s jersey will join Webbers, Peja’s and Bibby’s in my man cave of former great Kings- whether that happens this year or in 8 years, it’s still going to happen.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 1:21 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I don't want to load up in this draft.
I want a defensive big man who can score. Why do you people think I’m pushing Derrick Favors so hard? Do think it’s an accident I’m pushing ONE young player as opposed to 3 or 4?
I respect your arguments JJ, but anybody who says SpeedRacer is a leader is full of shit. Or they simply don’t have an accurate assessment of the Kings situation at the moment.
I don’t think Noc is likely to be traded unless a team like Boston decides they need him to make a stretch run this season. I don’t think the Kings will take on a worse contract with Noc the same way they haven’t with K9. I also don’t think K9 will be moved unless it’s with Noc or Beno and an expiring contract comes back for either guy.
Just as important, I, too, am a Kings fan first and a big Kevin Martin fan. I want to see Kevin succeed here, but I would be satisfied to see him do well elsewhere, Philadelphia or otherwise.
I think Kevin Martin is really valuable right now too. I don’t think getting Sammy D and Iggy is the best value the Kings can get. Quite honestly, there isn’t a perfect value for Kevin, but Iggy and Sammy D are probably the best the KINGS CAN REALISTICALLY GET at any point now or in the future. I don’t consider that good enough.
I’m willing to be patient and live through this year as I see improvement. I’m willing to see if the Kings can get a young big like a Favors and improve defensively enough to make more strides. Others or not, and I understand that too.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:34 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
“Quite honestly, there isn’t a perfect value for Kevin, but Iggy and Sammy D are probably the best the KINGS CAN REALISTICALLY GET at any point now or in the future.”
THANK YOU!
“I don’t consider that good enough.”
And I’ve been saying for the past month…who the hell do you guys want? Yao Ming for Martin?
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 1:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
nobody responded to that because it was a silly comment
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 1:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope.
I want a defensive big man who can score enough to keep him from being Kenny Thomas on the court. I don’t consider Kevin Martin the issue right now even with his struggles.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Or he's not the main issue for me to complain about the little stuff that has gone on.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A defensive big man that can score?
Like Dwight Howard or Chris Bosh? Amare does not cut it he plays no defense. Maybe Nene or Oakfor qualify for your wants. So every guy on the list that qualifies was picked in the top 7 and only 2 have ever been traded. Also they are not available right now. Defensive bigs that can score are some of the best all-around players in the league and Kevin MArtin is not enough to get one.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 2:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank You for understanding my point mayfield.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 3:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Recommended.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 1:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
yep yep yep.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 1:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Went no.
AI2 isn’t a good enough shooter to entice me at this point. I’m also not convinced that you can play Omri with AI2 and Reke and make it work either. Plus, there’s no guarantee with Dalembert that you’re better either.
Right now, hell to the no.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 10:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Iggy
Has a higher FG% then Martin for their careers. Who says you have to shoot from 25 feet away to be a good shooter. Offensively your not really losing and if you are not very much. Plus, iggy is a better defender, passer, rebounder, shotblocker, not to mention the intangbles.
by Doors Open on Feb 6, 2010 10:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well i am guessing tyreke has a better shooting percentage than Kevin. Doesn't mean he's a better shooter
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 12:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well put Wally.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well put Wally.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well put Wally.
When life gives you lemons, just say "f--- the lemons" and bail
by Player To Be Named Later on Feb 7, 2010 1:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
'

When life gives you lemons, just say "f--- the lemons" and bail
by Player To Be Named Later on Feb 7, 2010 10:44 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
This
coming from the guy who doesn’t want Chris Bosh, top 5 PER in the NBA, for JT or Hawes. Because JT and Hawes are going to evolve into dominant low post players, just wait and see.
And also this from the guy who would rather not have Rajon Rando on his team for anything, because lock down defenders and nightly triple double threats don’t really help your team and all.
And you know we really shouldn’t be interested in shaking up a team that lost 19 out of 22 games because the chemistry is bound to gel by 2015.
by bench_blob on Feb 6, 2010 11:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just to clarify
You are not talking about me
by Doors Open on Feb 6, 2010 11:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I do not want Rajon Rondo under any circumstance. Even more so with Tyreke Evans around. Even more so with what Rondo is getting paid (to be a 2nd All-Star on a team where if everyone was healthy he'd be the 4th best player)
Yeah, I’m crazy. As far as Bosh, I like him, no question, but I don’t believe selling the farm to get Bosh makes you a better team. You can’t get Bosh without selling the farm. That’s going to make it nearly impossible to make your team BETTER and improve with Bosh around. If the Kings could get a top flight defensive big with Bosh, and keep JT or Spence, I’d do that in a heartbeat. No, Samuel Dalembert does not qualify as a top flight defensive big.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I also voted no. I think we’d be getting superior talent back, but I don’t see how a Tyreke, AI, Casspi, JT, and Spencer lineup works. In today’s NBA, I just think you need at least two shooters on the floor to spread the floor to be able to have any success driving to the basket.
With that lineup, what would stop teams from packing the paint to keep Tyreke and AI from driving in? Whoever is guarding Omri could stay with him, and the rest of the team could just focus on stopping penetration.
by Charlieb on Feb 6, 2010 4:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Me too
Wait....Why is everybody clapping? Everyone around me is clapping.... I guess I should be clapping too... GO LAKERS!!! I hate living in So Cal
by 27freethrows on Feb 6, 2010 10:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Other than saving money, how does this help the Sixers?
Wouldn’t they rather have Martin AND Iggy and let us have their first rounder?
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 10:44 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
A team concerned as they are with salary would likely rather than its first rounder than Martin.
by sactown on Feb 6, 2010 10:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But I wouldn't really say that Philly is rebuilding.
From their perspective, trading Iguodala when you may not have to seems to set you back a bit.
I doubt they make the playoffs this year but imagine going into next year with no draft pick but a line-up of
Lou Williams
Kevin Martin
André Iguodala
Elton Brand
Marreese Speights
Thad Young coming off the bench?
Meanwhile, the Kings don’t have to worry about winning this season, they can improve by having 2 lottery picks. And we all know what magic Petrie can conjure with picks.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 11:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
EF-NO!
I just don’t get peoples infatuation with Iggy! He is extremely overpaid & overrated. This trade litterally makes me want to throw up. I am not opposed to trading KM but I would be happier with a straight salary dump that rids us of KM, Noce, &/or Beno. Do you realize how many horrible contracts the Kings would have?!!!!!!
I love beating dead horses.
by allbenji's on Feb 6, 2010 10:53 AM PST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
We would have no horrible contracts after the trade.
Dalembert expires next season and we would have a young all-star worthy defender who is improving and incredibly durable. Iguodala would be the only long-term deal with big money.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 11:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Its difficult to argue
that Iguodala isn’t at least moderately overpaid.
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 11:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It is difficult to argue that every NBA player is not overpaid.
I suppose you should look at salary divided by PER or salary divided by Win Shares. That could help see who has more value per dollar.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 2:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wasn't making a statement about social justice
if you compare Iggy to his peers, its tough to argue he’s not a little overpaid. He’s not Beno, but he has a big contract.
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 3:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Beno is a bad contract again? Really?
I remember being flamed for suggesting this a month or so back when he was playing good.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 1:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
*for suggesting trading him while his value was still high
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 1:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
*…and then everyone got on my case that Beno was suddenly worth a whole lot more than his contract and that we should hang onto it for a few years.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 1:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What makes you believe that Beno had value because he had some good games?
That was a big part of the argument.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In order to sell HIGH you have to have SOMEONE to actually BUY the commodity.
Capiche?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
WTF is the difference
between Iggy & Josh Howard? ok Howard can shoot & doesn’t cripple our franchise for years. Out of all the trade scenarios I’ve heard this is by far the worst. This actually ruins my day.
I love beating dead horses.
by allbenji's on Feb 6, 2010 10:59 AM PST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
What's the difference?
Oh, about four years in age and about 7 points in PER this season.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 1:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And about 40 million dollars.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 2:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But you'd be dropping Martin's contract as well
So you have to factor that in.
Iguodala is a better player than Howard. Better players cost money.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 2:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
70% to 30% in favor poll results, when I propose Iggy trade, which has been doing obsessively for 2 weeks, lol, it gets mainly negative reaction, with exception of mayfield, a fellow wise yoda-like blogger participant like myself.
First off, if you haven’t seen Iggy play, you are not entitled to an opinion, lol. OK, just kidding you can chime in, but let’s take it for what its worth, a hill of non-organic pinto beans, and at least be forthright and admit you haven’t seen him play enough. Don’t worry I am blessed with direct tv and league pass, so I will form a strong opinion, of which you can freely borrow as your own, lol.
Here’s what gets me: the best counter argument I have heard is that Tyreke needs a shooter playing at his side, so that when he drives the lane, he has someone to kick to on the wing. Iggy is not the best shooter so ix-nay on the trade-nay. When Tyreke drives to the hole and gets cut off he is looking for an open player to pass to. That doesn’t have to be a shooter! A player gets open by relying on his athleticism, instincts, aggression, and being attuned with teammates. Iggy is all that. There is more to getting open than just waiting at the 3 point line to catch a pass.
When considering if players will gel, I like to think of athleticism, attitude, defensive prowess, unselfishness, ways to score, and ability to contribute without monopolizing the ball. Iggy comes ahead on all counts. He can score on put-backs, transition, trailing plays, leading plays. And as a superior defender and rebounder, we get more stops, more transition breaks. Tyreke is a superior athletic specimen with bullying force. Iggy has the same physical gifts. Their aggressive styles of play would blend more than K-Mart and his finesse game. Tyreke and Iggy would punish opponents in transition, and as a duo of perimeter defenders. Sound intriguing? I think so. There’s more to chemistry than knocking down corner jumpers.
by bench_blob on Feb 6, 2010 11:02 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
I agree that Iggy is awesome. I just think if you can get a pick from Philly your future is brighter.
Petrie could get 2 big men, or one big man and one shooter, or one big man one perimeter defender. I think there would be more possibilities and more upside than with André.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 11:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What if we did this trade
and were able to get another late first round pick this year in a Noc or Beno trade? We’re already gonna have a top 5 pick this year to use on a good big man, and we all know what Petrie can do with a late first rounder. Then we’d in all likelihood have another lottery pick next year.
I guess I just feel like I’d be happy adding some proven talent in a Martin trade (Iggy and Dalembert, for example), seeing as we have a good amount of young potential now and in the near future anyways.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 11:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Contingent on another trade for a draft pick and dumping salary I would do it.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
obviously you are the only person in the world with League Pass
and thus the only person able to form an opinion. Iguodala is a good player, no question. He’s also paid about $3mil a year more than Martin, and we’re getting Dalembert with him, who also has an expensive contract.
And Iggy’s jumpshot or lack thereof is a concern. This year 72% of his shots have been jumpshots, and his eFG% is .405, that’s not good.
I don’t think this trade is horrendous, but I wouldn’t do it. I’d rather see what we can do with the cap space other than taking on two marginal/bad contracts.
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Sammy D also has a trade kicker as well.
This deal is about saving money for hte Sixers, and shaking up the Kings and building around AI2 and Reke. I’m not sure that’s in the Kings best interest short or long term. Sammy D is what he is.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i do hope that people who are pro on this trade don't actually think of Sammy as a long term solution
and even in the short term he isn’t much, just some solid depth.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 12:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think people are looking to trade Kevin because they see him as the problem and they want the Kings to win now.
I don’t think the Kings will suddenly become a better team long term by trading away Kevin now, and I think the patience that is needed with a young team would still apply with AI2 and Dalembert on the roster. Neither guy will be a cure all to the Kings problems.
Plus, if money is an issue, and it certainly was in the case of Okafor, then I can see why the Maloof’s would not be thrilled to take on more money for a player in Iggy who isn’t going to put people in the seats consistently.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Kings become a better team if Martin is dealt for the right player.
Iggy is a year younger and he doesn’t miss games. I’m not saying that this is the perfect deal but I would applaud a bold move that solves both long term and short term issues in one fail swoop. The Kings would get a similar/arguably better player and a shot blocker, move their free agency dreams back a year and buy some valuable time to assess the current talent while developing another pick.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 1:30 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
If the Kings had 2010 FA dreams they should have never taken Noc back in the Miller/Salmons deal.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just gonna let you speak for me on this from here on out
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 1:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think this is where I am as well
It’s not a perfect deal in any way, shape or form…but I think it makes us a better team.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 2:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I do not think Martin is the problem.
I think every player but Martin and Evans is the problem at least in some small way. I am not seeking to trade the team or players just to shake things up. But trading Martin for Iggy K9 for Dalembert and including an expiring (Armstrong is my preference) is a no brainer for me. We get upgrades at both positions at the cost of salary.
I do not expect us to be able to sign free agents so the salary cap room is less relevant for us. If we would acquire a big-time player in a future trade then we have higher quality assets for that hypothetical trade.
I do not think this would automatically make us a playoff team or even a .500 team, but we get more talent and we get younger, but with decent experience. People talk about how we have the 3rd youngest team in the NBA, but our starters have less experience than the Thunder or the Grizzlies. I think consistency and time will be the most important thing. Plus a 22 year-old Tyreke Evans who has been working with Coachie for 2 more years will be freaking ridiculous.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 3:05 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Sammy gets the Kings to a better point in history.
I agree that he isn’t a long term fix but I also know that Hawes, who takes the first 35-40 games off to start the season and Thompson who gets a bad case of the January’s will be better players in 2011 than they are right now. Factor into this equation a top 10 pick power player getting a year or seasoning behind a threesome of Hawes, JT and Sammy and I think the Kings are better for the investment.
Hell, it’s not my money.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 1:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the Kings are wary buyers at this point.
Which is why the only trades they’ve made since the deadline included financial incentives that didn’t hurt the Maloof’s pocketbook.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we (definitely myself included) really do not realize how much they are hurting financially in the here and now
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 1:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Maloofs need WINS.
Kings win, the stadium begins to fill back up. Kings lose 4 in a row on the road and the 10,000 peeps show up. If they spend it we will come.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 1:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ummm
if they spend we might not necessarily win
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 1:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
None of these deals makes you a better team in the interim. But there is one thing that is guaranteed: You have a lot more salary for a bit longer than you did before without this deal.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Kings aren't better with Iggy and Sammy?
This team lacks interior defense and defensive rebounding. Iggy plays evey night and is a better defender, rebounder and play maker. Dalembert is a very good rebounder and defender. Again, I love Martin and I would love to see Evans, Martin and Iggy play side by side but this deal would make the Kings better today and next year and probably the year after that.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 1:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think they dramatically improve.
Sammy is a reasonable rebounder, but a very good defender? Uh, not really no.
I think people are frustrated by the last month and half and it’s clouding the reality of where this team was always headed: Towards another bottom of the NBA finish.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm frustrated but...
I see this as a win win as long as the Kings don’t toss in a JT, Hawes, Omri, Donte. The Kings are really struggling with finding enough shots to go around for all of these guys. I think players like Omri and Donte are pressing because they believe that they are more than just NBA role players and they want to show that to everyone. The reduction in shots between Martn and Iguodala is roughly 4 opportunities per game and I think those shots would be a god sent to some of these hungry young dudes.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 1:50 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
You're going to tell me that Iggy will reduce his shot opportunities coming here?
I doubt that.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No, there is a reduction in shots taken + free throws....
from Martin to Iguodala of about 4 per game. Martin averages 23.2 shots + FT this season- down from 26.2 last year. Iguodala is at 19.3 combined this yr and close to that for the last few years. Martin takes about the right amount of shots IMO for his role but when you add the other posessions where he gets fouled and goes tot he line, that number becomes pretty high- again, not that I mind because he hits the FTs. The point is, landing Iggy in a trade would free up a few shots for a few other guys that are currently being taken by Kevin Martin. The result may be negative but these young guys need a few more looks IMO. Also, Iguodala has some pretty nice assist and rebounding numbers for a 2/3. I just have a real hard time believing that he isn’t a far superior all around player than Martin.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 2:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and Pookey, on a seperate note...
The little dude tossed my laptop and broke the screen. I can’t watch the little one and sit in our office on the desk top so that is why I have not gone forward with the epic piece we had developed (which is now locked away in a dead computer). Hopefully I will be able to work it out asap. Sorry dude.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 1:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I still have the words if you want me to resend them to you.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I have them in my e-mail.
This is the perfect time to bust out that article. When I really get into a piece it stays with me all day and I think of new ways to work it and this particular piece is doing that. I will try to to get back into it today. Any ideas on how to get into a laptop that has no monitor? It sill starts up the screen just turns on for a second and then disapears.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 1:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No if I had any computer expertise I'd be fixing my own laptop.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you could
attach an external monitor, if you have one. or a docking station.
by what_the_crap on Feb 6, 2010 1:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Or you could attach an external monitor or a docking station if you have one.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
I was being a smartass. Gives me an idea how to maybe fix my laptop though.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 2:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No. It's a completely different issue.
What mine does is have problems loading and freezing up. My firefox does a lot of “not responding” (especially when I’m watching the Kings on broadband). It’s an internal issue, but I was thinking the site you linked to might be able to help me find an answer.
It’s not a simple answer like hooking up to a monitor to my laptop either.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 2:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you haven't
tried it already, try running a defrag, or CHKDSK. Try and clear as much memory as you can. Anything you dont need, delete it.
Also, reinstalling Firefox might help. Or you can just throw it at Kobe next time he comes to Arco.
by what_the_crap on Feb 6, 2010 2:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Be a bit hard since I live in Seattle.
But thanks anyway.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 3:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No problem!
Just wait until the next time he comes up to play the Son…
Never mind.
by smgmatt on Feb 6, 2010 6:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Low blow
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 8:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not meant to be
I’ve voiced my opinion on this more than once. The whole thing disgusted me.
This is one thing that I’m absolutely behind Simmons on (and incidentally something I thought of independent of him bringing it up), in that I won’t refer to the new team’s name, and don’t care to recognize them as a legitimate franchise.
The fact that they got Durant in the process makes me even more angry . . . but this is neither the time nor place, so I’ll just leave it at that.
The point of my comment was more to state that there SHOULD be a team there, when in fact there is not.
by smgmatt on Feb 6, 2010 8:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you haven't watched Sonicsgate you should.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 10:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good.
It was good stuff for those who haven’t viewed it.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I was just joking, as always
I just fish for cheap “recs” as a way to fill the void in my life too big for boxed wine and ice cream alone.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 11:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You would rather drink beer than wine?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Or wine than beer I mean?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cheap wine is cheaper than cheap beer
Otherwise, no.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 11:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cheap wine tastes better than cheap beer in my opinion
But I prefer beer on most days.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement, Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order, and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
by Aykis16 on Feb 7, 2010 12:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Let me be more precise
Beer, wine, or bourbon depending on many different factors. But I’m more likely to have cheap wine in the house these days than cheap beer.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 7, 2010 8:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, I will try this in a few.
The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.
by jjham15 on Feb 6, 2010 1:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is the best argument against Iguodala so far.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 12:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i am usually one of those who says no
but only because i would think the 76ers wouldn’t go for the trade so why bother thinking about it.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 12:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Iggy is the kind of player
that would complement Ty. He’s a lot like Ty in that he can carry a time in crunch time. This would be a great trade IMO but not likely because why would Philly.
by KingsFan on Feb 6, 2010 11:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
NO.
That is all.
by Carl on Feb 6, 2010 11:35 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
No
No way I would do this. It’s too much long-term salary to take on, and Iggy and SD haven’t been able to get the 76ers to the second round of the Eastern playoffs. Why would they help here in the west? I wouldn’t trade Martin, unless it was to include Nocioni with him for an expiring contract or better big man. SD is too inconsistent.
Vi Victa Vis
by cicero on Feb 6, 2010 11:47 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I like that as well. They are in the east. Why are they losing?
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 12:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
no D whats so ever
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 12:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
“Iggy and SD haven’t been able to get the 76ers to the second round of the Eastern playoffs”
2 players aren’t a Basketball team.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 12:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Um I don't get it
Why would philly do this? The only way this would work would be if Philly is actually trying to dump Dalembert’s contract for nothing. I would do a straight up Kevin for Andre trade but why would Philly throw in Dalembert?
by White Brocklate on Feb 6, 2010 11:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Because they don't want to pay him
and Philly realizes having an overpaid center for two years when you’re not going to contend anyway doesn’t make sense……
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 11:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sammy's contract expires in 2011 4-3.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So basically you're talking a season & change.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
right, so...
What benefit do the Kings get for paying Dalembert $15-$18mil between now and next summer (counting kicker)?
In theory he’ll be a big expiring at this time next year, but sometimes even those don’t end up getting traded, and then you’re paying all that money when you have no chance to contend anyway and next summer when he’s a free agent, you’ll have the same options you’d have without getting him now.
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 11:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're a smarter man than I am 4-3.
Beats the shit outta me.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
does Dalembert's pay equal into the equation?
If the Kings cannot afford his salary, if things are that bad for them right (which is a very distinct possibility) then I would hope they would not even think about doing this trde.
However, if they can sustain the business, I don’t really see the problem with paying him 15-18 million for a year and a half. Personally, I am okay with overpaying a guy short term. I don’t think his contract will hinder the Kings much (i don’t see us making a huge deal this offseason) and I think we need someone competant in our frontcourt who can at least play 20 minutes. I know it limits our options (this summer can’t spend big on a PF or C for the long term) but i think i would rather draft one of the bigs coming into the draft anyway.
But yeah, as for the Iggy contract concerns, that I can understand a little bit more, albet I would personally prefer this trade.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 12:27 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
i still don’t understand why the 76ers would do this. I would think they could get rid of Dalembert without dumping Iggy and I just don’t see how Kevin Martin helps that team.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 12:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i would also like to point out to all the Pro-Amare and Pro-Boozer people that the 76ers are really regretting that Brand signing that was supposed to make so great
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 12:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dalembert has a year and a half left on his contract.
If (and I’m saying IF, since I believe he will work out) he doesn’t work out, his contract would still be worth value as an expiring contract next season.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 12:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
To do what?
Get another big contract like Iggy’s?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I voted no...
but I posted a very similar trade in the Asinine Trade Thread:
Iggy & Dalembert for Martin, Thomas & Beno
I wouldn’t consider doing the deal without getting rid of Beno’s contract, thereby taking back less overall salary.
Having said that, some of the arguements I hear simply don’t hold water. Iggy=Josh Howard? C’mon – look at their stats and tell me that they are the same player. It’s really not that close. Iggy is a bad contract? He might be a little overpaid, but his deal isn’t so bad. You could make an argument that he is a better player than Martin, who is paid about 3 million less a year, which isn’t too much different. The following arguements are what I consider to be relevant:
1. With Iguodala, you gain significant durability, defense and rebounding that Martin simply doesn’t provide. You lose outside shooting, which with Tyreke as your point, is a significant loss. Both Iggy and Martin are athletic players, so you aren’t gaining or losing anything significant there. To do this deal, you have to believe that Martin/Evans won’t work in the future. Iggy/Evans would almost certainly work very well on defense, but offensively would be a question mark as well…
2. Dalembert is too big of a contract to take back. Valid point, but as Ziller mentioned in his post game recap, the Kings really need some interior defense. I don’t know if Sammy is that guy, but at some point, the Kings have to get someone to shore up the middle and he is a pretty good player in that regard.
3. Hold the current team together because they aren’t going to the playoffs anytime soon anyways. This is true to a certain extent – Petrie can afford to be patient and I agree that there is no need to rush things. But at some point, you need to make a leap and pull the trigger. Maybe this is the deal, maybe not. But at some point, you have got to have some balls and take a chance on either a trade or a free agent. Just sayin…
"Granted, this is not a great situation, but when all you have is lemons, you add some vodka to dull the pain..."
by Mcamp49 on Feb 6, 2010 12:07 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
They're both really good players, who are worth their contracts, or just slightly less than them
Why would the 76ers throw out their players like a clearance special at some flea market? I think both of them are worth more than ONLY expiring contracts. You’ve got to think from their perspective, too.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hell yes
Basically K-Mart for Iggy and Dalembert? Where do I sign?
I think some of you that voted no are thinking in terms of offense only. Iggy and Dalembert are both well-rounded players, known more for their D than their offense. We don’t need K-Mart as the primary scorer anymore. What we need are glue guys that can solidify this team around Tyreke. Plus, we already have a viable second scoring option in Omri, while Iggy and Dalembert do still have a moderate offensive game.
I think this is one of the best deals i’ve ever seen and I’m seeing a lot of people throwing it out the window like a hot-cake, without much explanation as to why.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 12:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think some of you that voted yes
are only thinking about the players and not considering the financial implications.
This isn’t K-Mart, and expirings for Iguodala/Dalembert.
Its K-Mart + whatever you would do with the $20mil we pay Dalembert + the $3mil a year in salary difference between K-Mart and Iggy for Iggy/(Dalembert for two years)
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 12:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i would rather pay Dalembert $20mill for a year and a half than Haywood $20 mill for 4 years
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 12:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
interesting question
Are you presuming JT/Hawes + a big we draft this summer will be ready in two years and thus Dalembert wouldn’t be needed after the upcoming year? Because if not, you have to presume you’re going to replace Dalembert with someone that will cost legit $$$.
I’d be pretty happy with adding Haywood this summer for 4yrs/$20mil honestly.
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 12:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Say JT/Hawes aren’t ready, I have not looked but it would seem to me that we would have lots of money under the salary cap NEXT offseason (2011). Granted, we might use alot of that to resign Hawes but if we consider him as “not being reading” then I am assuming he not part of the future and we can spend it on another big, who yes is likely to cost legit $$$.
I think regardless of whether we pick up Dalembert’s contract or not, we will have spend legit $$$, either now or later if we wish to acquire a big in free agency. Please correct me if I am wrong, but it seems to me what you are really worried here is that we are limiting our options, essentially, we are closing a door here. Instead of having the discretion to pay up for a player we need (likely a big) either THIS offseason or NEXT offseason, the idea of picking up Dalembert would make it so we can really only go after a free agent NEXT summer and that’s it.
If this is in fact what you are thinking, I would argue that the deal is worth it simply because I don’t see that big i want long term this offseason. Heck i dunno if i see it next offseason (unless Perkins and his dislocated shoulder becomes available). I think it’s less risky to overpay Dalembert for a year and a half (and yes, it is definitely overpaying) then it is to pay Haywood for 4 years because I don’t want Haywoods last two years (I also have a feeling he will cost more than 5 mill a year if a team under the salary cap goes after him). I think they are similar, neither is a long term fix. If Dalembert is available now, I would rather get him for sure now and know it’s only two years. We really need some depth down low.
I must note though, my opinion on the trade as a whole is based largely on the fact that I like Iggy more than Kevin Martin and I really don’t want to start focusing on the trees on that one, I would prefer to just look at the forest and argue that I think he’s a better player. Obviously, I haven’t made a great arguement on that part and that’s not the point of what i was trying to say.
I will say as a cautionary note, that I hope people are not saying no to this trade solely because they want to tank for the rest of the year. I get the fact the Kings are not that talented right now and need the lottery picks but if there is a trade out there that betters the team without hindering the team’s future, I would want the Kings to do it. Personally, I don’t see the commitment to Dalembert as being much of a hinderance (granted i have no idea how desperate the Maloofs are for liquidity) on our ability to improve through the draft and free agency and I personally think Iggy is a better player than Iggy. That’s about it.
By getting Dalembert we limit our options, we can’t go with the now, we must go with the later. If there is someone you think is worth it now, then i suppose you might want to take that risk.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 1:03 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
sorry that last sentence was not supposed to be there
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 1:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
The Kings are going to experience some serious salary implications, if their salary total is right at the salary cap.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 12:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NO
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Feb 6, 2010 12:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
wow
reke
AI
Casspi
JT
Dalembert
Bench: Beno, Greene, Hawes, The Monster….thats a nice looking team
by shadowchicken on Feb 6, 2010 12:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
What lttg said
NO
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 12:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
To add on my NO
Let me say I don’t really think this trade deadline is the time to make a significant trade, unless it’s a no brainer.
Hell, I’m even reluctant to make a Dalembert for K-9, unless we could unload Noce or Beno in other moves. I would love to keep financial flexibility as much as possible.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 1:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If i am saying no to this trade
this is the logic i am using
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 1:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's mine
I believe Iggy is a better player than Kevin, I don’t doubt that. I question the fit with Tyreke and also question the financial implications (I posted a bit on that below).
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 2:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here is my suggestion. It is rather asinine, and I apologize in advance.
Boston gets André Iguodala and Beno Udrih
Philly gets Kevin Martin, Andres Nocioni, and Hilton Armstrong
Sacramento gets Ray Allen and Samuel Dalembert, a 2010 first round pick from Sixers and a 2012 first rounder from Boston
We dump some serious contracts this year, get a couple good picks, and have an expiring defensive big man to trade to a contender next season.
Philly saves money and gets Martin.
Boston looks a whole helluva lot tougher starting Rondo, Iggy, Pierce, Garnett and Perkins with Beno, House and Big Baby off the bench. For that they give us their pick in 2 years. Or 3.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 12:56 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
No way Philly does that
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 12:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was just thinking that. I wonder who we would have to give up in addition.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 12:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I’m in the boat where the Sixers would want some value in their trade. They’d want a good player and expirings before they blow their whole team up… That’s about the extent of what they’d trade. You don’t ship off your bad contracts to teams that are rebuilding.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 1:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And rebuilding teams don't ship
their draft picks. If that’s where Philly is heading they probably want to keep those.
The only way I see Philly giving up their picks is if a team takes on Elton Brand’s contract
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 1:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 1:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In a heartbeat
This deal would continue the Kings emergence towards a tougher. more physical, defensive minded team.
Martin seems to be on his way out anyway.
"The basis for winning an NBA title is having a superstar in his prime. Not an all-star, or a bunch of all-stars, but a superstar."
by coolcatreportdotcom on Feb 6, 2010 12:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
and if we really need someone who can bury an open 3 from the corner we can draft some science major from the patriot league or something in the second round
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:36 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I like Sammy D for his interior D and fairly short contract
I’d try to get a third team involved to take on Iggy though. He’s an excellent player, but we already have Tyreke to do the same stuff and then some at a way cheaper price.
www.mancancook.net
by vfettke on Feb 6, 2010 1:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
imagine reke iggy and donte running a break
hell ya
by 31_FLAVAS on Feb 6, 2010 2:05 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ziller
There’s something called an “Asinine Trade Thread” for this kind of stuff. Please observe proper StR protocol before posting in the future. Thanks.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 2:05 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
Hilarious. I hope he doesn't flag you.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 2:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
this just made my day
awesome
Phil Jackson, after treatment for a kidney stone "When the anesthesiologist leaned over me, he said "We named your kidney stone Kobe because it's not passing."
by Ellimist on Feb 6, 2010 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Quick look at the financial implications
2011-2012
With this move the Kings woule be at $55,305,093, before any draft picks.
Roster would be Noce, Beno, Cisco, Reke, Hawes, JT, Omri, Donte, Brock, Iggy, Sammy D. Add a high pick and we’re looking at close to $60 mil with a 12 man roster.
2012-2013
We would be at $43,081,948. This takes into account Reke, JT, Omri, and Donte having their options picked up.
IT doesn’t take into account Spencer’s extension or qualifying offer for $4 mil. It also doesn’t take into account the salary of our 2011’d draft pick. It also doesn’t take into account the salary for our 2012 draft pick. That takes us up to something like $54-$56 mil
If that’s the case, the 11-man roster would be Noce, Beno, Cisco, Reke, JT, Omri, Donte, Spencer, Iggy, 2011 draft pick, and 2012 draft pick.
All of this info per Shamsports. Please anyone feel free to correct any of the numbers above.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 2:11 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Where is the salary cap relative to this?
I know we could only project where future caps might be, but I’m assuming the Maloofs don’t want to drift in to the luxury tax zone?
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
by outrider on Feb 6, 2010 2:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Per Larry Coon
The cap is at $57.7 this year. From what I’ve read, many have predicted this to go down to around $54 (maybe lower) next year.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 2:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Meaning the Kings would be at the salary cap
In order to sign free agents, you only can use money below the salary cap. Right now, the Kings are something like $5 mil under the cap.
HOWEVER, there are exceptions. I believe teams can match another team’s offer, if their player goes into free agency. They can also offer whatever they want, if they possess a player’s Bird Rights, I believe. Also, there are exemptions if you’re over the salary cap. For example, since the Kings were over the salary cap last season, they offered Beno and Garcia a mid-level exemption. A mid level exemption consists of paying them the average NBA salary at a fixed number of years.
Anyway, those exemptions are worth about 5 to 7 mil, so that’s all we’d be able to offer, anyway. If we left the team the way it is and dropped K9, along with all the other expirings, the Kings will have roughly $12 mil in cap (using this year’s salary cap) to offer a free agent in the 2010 FA market.
However, many of us believe gambling in that market is not the way to go, and it’s best to pick up a good big man now, since things clearly aren’t working out with this team. The others believe taking the hit and using that $12 mil for a player is the way to go.
If this trade did go through, the Kings wouldn’t have any money to mingle in the 2010 FA market, but they wouldn’t be in the luxury tax, either, and would still be able to offer exemptions for renewal contracts.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 4:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Kings are not 5 million under the cap.
They’re about 1.3 million under the cap right now. Do not get yourself in trouble in believing you can use exceptions like the Mid Level and cap room together. That is stricly prohibited. As it is, the Kings do not have the use of the Mid Level Exception this season because they renounced it in order to be under the cap.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And the tax line is much higher
If I’m reading correctly from Coon’s Q&A, the tax line is at $69.92 mil this year
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 2:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Meaning
That the luxury tax doesn’t kick in until salaries are above 69.92 mil? My knowledge of the cap and associated issues is limited at best…
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
by outrider on Feb 6, 2010 2:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's Pookey territory
or a couple others here that are knowledgable on the topic. But I believe you are correct. Once your $$ hit that line, you start paying tax. I also believe this tax payment doesn’t happen until the end of the season, so teams (like New Orleans this year) have the whole season to make moves and get under that line.
At this point, being over the cap is what I’m looking at because they would limit our ability to make moves or sign players. Again, I’m a rookie on NBA money stuff but we have many here that can clearly answer some of your questions.
If you’re interested in learning more about this, Larry Coon’s Q&A is the place to go.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 3:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My concern as well
At this point, being over the cap is what I’m looking at because they would limit our ability to make moves or sign players.
I’m totally with you there and that’s my big concern.
I actually bookmarked the Coon page before signing up here, but I haven’t had Pookey’s time or inclination to master the damn thing! (Plus, we need to have some reason to keep Pook around, right?)
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
by outrider on Feb 6, 2010 3:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah the biggest reason would be that I still feel like coming around.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 3:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I love ya Pook!
So, In keeping with my laziness about reading the Coon stuff, is ed right about the 69.92 amount? what does it mean (relative to making deals) to be over the cap?
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
by outrider on Feb 6, 2010 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It means that there is 12.22 million dollars of wiggle room in being over the salary cap and before you start paying a dollar for dollar tax for being over the luxury tax line.
But the way Ed did describe the tax is the way it works. If you had 70 million even in salary, you would be responsible for the 70 million in salary plus the 8 thousand in luxury tax as well.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
80 thousand^
Not 8 thousand.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Think I found my answer above...
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.
by outrider on Feb 6, 2010 5:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And by the way
This a great argument. Both sides have great points.
I hope that this puts any “Kevin Martin group think/love” BS to rest. Yes, many of us love Speed, but are also willing to see him go to improve the team. And I’m saying this having voted No.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 2:23 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good observation.
The difference in the 2 sides to this is HOW we should improve the team.
Another flaw in the human character is that everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance. Vonnegut
by Ice_9ine on Feb 6, 2010 2:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I voted yes, after much consideration
all things equal, there is no question that the Kings get substantially more talented with this trade, it makes 2 of our weaknesses into strenghts, in perimiter defense and defensive rebounding. It has to be assumed that Dalembert would start.
Now, the only quesiton of this trade has to be the finacial implications…..Dalembert is on the books for only one more season, so his contract can’t be too big of an issue. If push comes to shove, next season he will be very tradeable, seeing how he is an excellent defensive big man and a huge expiring contract.
The main issue in this trade, no matter what side you are on, is Iggy’s contract. Now this comes down to opinion, but I think 3 million a year more is not that much when looking at these players’ contracts…I think 3 million a year extra is WORTH IT, seeing all the other aspects you get with a player like Iggy. He has to be a top 6 or 7 in COMPLETE players in the game.
Another issue here is how the kings loose finacial flexibility….who do you want to get with that room? Is there any player that you think the kings can get through Free angency that is better/better value than Iggy? Petrie has a history of overpaying players; there was a great post a while ago on how they would rather see the Kings make a trade for a slightly overpaid player than have petrie have to overpay to get a player to come to sacramento.
Given the Finacial parts of this trade, I think it would be fair to hold out for them taking Noc as well, (or mabye even Beno, but thats streching it) but this is a fair trade for both teams. I think the kings would be hard pressed to find a deal for impact players like this one, without giving one of your young bigs.
Phil Jackson, after treatment for a kidney stone "When the anesthesiologist leaned over me, he said "We named your kidney stone Kobe because it's not passing."
by Ellimist on Feb 6, 2010 3:18 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
There is a true issue here that I think is being ignored.
Do the Kings want to put all their eggs in their basket with Iggy & Sammy D? My belief is no for a lot of reasons that I will try to capture as best as I can.
There is no question that Iggy has a higher PER, but he’s also one of the primary ball handlers for the Sixers. That’s what he does best offensively is handle the ball and slash. He is also heavily turnover prone, but that’s okay. Kevin Martin is not doing so swell in that department consistently either. (AI has about double the assists Kevin gets.)
My question with Iggy isn’t whether he’s better or not than SpeedRacer. At this point, is how does Iggy project around the other players on this team. You could say the question at this point is do the Kings need another ball handler with Tyreke more than they need a shooter (when Kevin shoots well that is) with Tyreke? And, as Eddie said just up top of this comment, it comes down to opinion on whether this team needs one or the other.
On the face of the value, this deal isn’t about Sammy D because he isn’t a long term cost. But, Iggy is. And he’s more expensive than Martin for what doesn’t necessarily rate as a clear upgrade in my eyes. The reason it doesn’t rate as a clear upgrade is because you’re swapping 2 players at the same position (Iggy and Speed are basically off-guards), and you’re bringing in a guy who does many of the same things as Reke already does. Does this addition make Reke worse or better?
Additionally, you have the question is how movable Iggy is if he doesn’t work out in Sacramento. That’s what really scares me more than anything else. There is no guarantee that moving Iggy would be possible as he gets more expensive (especially with a looming CBA that is likely to make contracts like Iggy even more difficult to move) in the next several years. Essentially you’re putting all your eggs into one basket with Andre Iguodala, and, IMO, he’s just not good enough to do that.
(This is my way of explaining what Eddie already has in a way.)
Here’s where I think people need to step back and take a long view. I didn’t expect a winning team at any point this season. I was thrilled by the victories in November & December (and January), but I’m not downtrodden by the recent streak of losing. There’s too much history in this league that suggests that making your team younger doesn’t make your team more competitive in the interim.
I think many problems stem from the raised expectations that the early winning brought about. I, too, want to see a winning team. But I don’t believe the Kings are far from finished in their rebuilding yet. They still have a high draft pick (which would be really swell if the Kings could use that pick to improve on defense on the interior), they still have much growing on both ends to do with the young players ALREADY on the roster. Spence, JT, Omri, Donte, and Reke all have much room to grow. That patience, that almost barbaric satanic masochistic word is necessary.
Jerry Reynolds had a great piece of wisdom (or I think it’s great anyway—I don’t care if anybody else does or not) in his bright breezy memoir about owners:
Any way you slice it the deal was bad. (The Derek Smith trade.) You often see that around the league now with new owners who don’t really understand how the league works. They get ahead of themselves in trying to push their teams to the next level. Making this trade set our franchise back 4, 5 6 years, who knows?
Basically that’s what I think has really happened with most of the people here. The judgment is: We’re not that far away if we get better interior defense and change the mix up. Here’s the reality: This judgment is being based on improvement from Spence, JT, Donte, Omri and Reke that hasn’t happened yet.
I don’t think Omri’s shooting got worse because of Kevin. I think his shooting has got worse because he hasn’t fully developed as a NBA player and is still getting accustomed to how the NBA works. He’s making strides as a player no doubt. He’s far better than anybody thought he had the right to be up to this point. That doesn’t mean that taking Kevin Martin out of the equation and substituting Andre Iguodala will make Omri a better player in the future.
JT has struggled, Spence has struggled, Omri has struggled, Donte has made progress but also has struggled at times too, Reke has struggled, the whole team has struggled at one point or another. This is not a complete, or perfect team yet. Let’s sit back and ride this thing out and make minor tweaks as the next several years go by. Decisions do not have to be made today because the last month & half for everyone has been unsatisfactory.
SYNOPSIS:
As far as I’m concerned, unless you’re making a trade for a superstar player while keeping the majority of your young core intact, you’re not making progress by making a deal for Iggy. You’re only compounding the problem by taking a very good player instead of a great one with the kind of money Iggy is making.
The deals I see happening are minor deals that could see the Kings move a Nocioni (if that’s even possible at this point—it very well may not be) to save some dollars at some point. But just because you save dollars on Noc doesn’t mean that should give you an extra incentive to make an Iggy deal. It’s just wise to shed a contract where and when you can when the opportunity presents itself.
This team can and will come back. But impatience and eagerness to improve a thoroughly flawed product is not one way to be successful. If that was the case, the Kings would have won 10 championships in the Gregg Lukenbill/JIm Thomas era.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 3:22 PM PST reply actions 6 recs
well stated pookey
I agree, I don’t have the urgency to do something like this deal now.
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 3:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts exactly but written in a much much better way.
Good stuff Pookey, that post was the perfect lenght by the way and I’m being 100% serious.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 3:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
good read and I do have a question
Additionally, you have the question is how movable Iggy is if he doesn’t work out in Sacramento. That’s what really scares me more than anything else. There is no guarantee that moving Iggy would be possible as he gets more expensive (especially with a looming CBA that is likely to make contracts like Iggy even more difficult to move) in the next several years. Essentially you’re putting all your eggs into one basket with Andre Iguodala, and, IMO, he’s just not good enough to do that.
You argue there is no guarantee that moving Iggy would be possible as he gets more expensive in the next several years but what about Kevin Martin? What if he fails here? I have stated many times that I am not huge on moving Kevin Martin (largely because his trade value appears pretty darn low at the moment – don’t try to tell me Josh Howard, Okafur, or McGrady are fair value) but I don’t understand how trading for Iggy (who i do feel is comparible value) is putting all our eggs in one basket but waiting with Kevin is not. I know he costs more but I also feel that he has very similar trade value with Kevin in this league and that’s including his salary increase over Martin. I dunno, I just feel like it’s very similar risks either way.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 3:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry that first paragraph was supposed to look like this
Additionally, you have the question is how movable Iggy is if he doesn’t work out in Sacramento. That’s what really scares me more than anything else. There is no guarantee that moving Iggy would be possible as he gets more expensive (especially with a looming CBA that is likely to make contracts like Iggy even more difficult to move) in the next several years. Essentially you’re putting all your eggs into one basket with Andre Iguodala, and, IMO, he’s just not good enough to do that.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 3:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair question Wally.
First, it’s a matter of opinion in how valuable Iggy vs Speed is around the league. If you listen to fans, Martin is pretty valuable. The question is do teams feel the same way. I’m not even sure why the Sixers do this deal to be honest with you other than it saves money and they can perhaps get on the way of rebuilding their team a bit differently. I’m not really sure how Kevin Martin HELPS make them a better team next season and beyond.
One area that this concerns me is that Iggy is already making significantly more than Kevin right now. About 3 million more to be exact. That’s a lot of extra money each (although that drops next season in fairness to the Iggy supporters), but goes up at about the same rate every year afterwards. Additionally, Iggy also has an extra year that will be (conceivably) when any extension for Reke and Omri come through. Almost every year, you’re talking about a guy making 2-3 million more than Kevin AND with an extra year on his deal. There is a reason why Iggy is in talk for deals because Philly is trying to make a deal that suits them using Iggy as the bait.
I’m not concerned about the next 2 years after this season. It’s the next 2 years AFTER that I’m concerned with. To me this is a very tricky deal where it’s asking a lot of things to go well for it to work out well. There’s a lot of downside and little upside.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 3:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah that last year of his contract could be pretty brutal
I really don’t see why the 76ers would want this trade. It makes little sense to me so I do have to wonder why TZ put this poll up (ducking the lightning).
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 4:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because it spawned a great conversation?
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Feb 6, 2010 4:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
good enough i suppose. it is a good conversation. beats just about 99.999999994915% of what you get in the asinine trade section
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 4:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's because many of the most knowledgable StR members don't participate there.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 4:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I do like that Iguodala is a much more well-rounded player than Martin. The frustrating thing about Martin is that he’s only good at scoring, and when he’s off he really has no other way of helping the team. His defense is terrible, he’s not a good passer, and he doesn’t really find ways to do the little things. It’s scoring or nothing.
But that said, I think Tyreke and Iguodala duplicate each other to an uncomfortable degree. Their games are extremely similar – both need the ball and slash and aren’t great shooting from outside. Tyreke is a really unique player and ideally you’d surround him with guys who can shoot from outside so the other team doesn’t pack the lane. What i find insane about the “Tyreke and Martin can’t play together” meme is that Martin is EXACTLY the type of player you’d want alongside Tyreke. It hasn’t worked for long stretches yet, but that’s not to say it won’t work down the line. Martin and Tyreke worked brilliantly together in the Utah game. Tyreke/Iguodala would be great defensively, but I don’t like it on offense.
Factor in the extra cost of Iguodala, and I’m just not sure it makes sense. The only reason to trade Martin is if a big is coming in. Other than that the potential of Evans/Martin as a dynamic backcourt is too great to pass up.
by nbrans on Feb 6, 2010 4:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"But that said, I think Tyreke and Iguodala duplicate each other to an uncomfortable degree."
What’s funny is this is the exact same argument against drafting Wall.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i do worry that sometimes when looking at the forest we get lost looking into the trees
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is an apples to oranges comparison
If you get the #1 you pick Wall and figure it out later. It’s a massive net improvement. That’s a completely different situation than considering giving up Martin for someone who makes $12 million a year and who may not represent an improvement.
And besides, I think Wall and Evans could play together, but that’s a discussion for another thread.
by nbrans on Feb 6, 2010 5:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I actually agree with that Cloudy.
It is the same argument essentially. The difference between Wall is that he’s 20 years old and will be making 8 million-10 million less than iggy will over the next 4 seasons beyond this one. That’s assuming Wall gets taken at 1st overall.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If the choice is between Wall and Iggy
I take Wall every day
Father of the "Natt this!" movement, Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order, and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
by Aykis16 on Feb 6, 2010 8:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes well Iggy isn't going to get that much better
Wall has freakish potential. Could be a Superstar. You Know who would pick Iguodala over him
by MJ5 on Feb 6, 2010 8:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would take Wall too.
But that is not a choice.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 8:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well the question is does this short-term upgrade effect our future prospects.
I do not think our young player’s development is based upon having Kevin or AI2 on the team. They will improve based upon their own hard work and we lose none of our young core players, nor do we put others in their roles. The only downside is money spent.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 4:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think this is both a short-term and a long-term gain
Iguodala is young and improving as well. Two years from now is is prime along with a 22 year-old Tyreke and Spence at 23, etc.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 4:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
One could also argue that putting all your eggs into one basket with Martin isn’t a good plan, either.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What are you even talking about?
What eggs are in what basket? Is Martin the hand in the bush that’s worth two birds?
by nbrans on Feb 6, 2010 5:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he's referring to pookey's post talking about putting all our eggs in one basket with Iggy
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But pookey's metaphor made sense, his didn't
What pookey was saying is that if you do this trade you’ve essentially given up your trade chips and gone all in with Iguodala. You’ve used up your eggs, so Iguodala had better work.
Keeping Martin does not constitute putting all of your eggs in one basket. You still have eggs (Martin, Thomas, potential cap space) and the basket isn’t full.
God I hate the eggs in the basket metaphor. Who wants an omelette?
by nbrans on Feb 6, 2010 5:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
as you can probably see above, i would actually agree someone with cloudyeyes on this
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I personally think that doing this trade only limits the kings this offseason, other than that i don't see how it is more limiting then keeping Martin
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It limits you becacuse Iguodala has a much bigger contract
Which:
1) Means he’s harder to move if it doesn’t work
2) Cuts into potential cap space
by nbrans on Feb 6, 2010 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but igoudala is better than anyone the kings could possibly sign in free agency
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But that difference in salaries could help facilitate a trade
or help get a player that, added to not losing Kevin Martin, could help the team in other areas.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure I totally agree ed
You are against trading for a guy that might be an upgrade because it might prevent us from trading for a guy that might be an upgrade…in the future?
I’m not sure if this proposed Iggy deal is the right one for this team, but I’d hate for this team to be paralyzed because they are always hoping for that “better deal” down the road.
On the flip side, I do understand that making a trade just for trade’s sake is bad juju as well. We need to hope Petrie finds that happy medium.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
On the flip side, I do understand that making a trade just for trade’s sake is bad juju as well. We need to hope Petrie finds that happy medium.
That’s what this talk mostly feels like to me. A change that’s needed for change sake because a group of the fanbase wants to see winning now.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Could very well be
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 5:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I've been agreeing with you way too much today.
by nbrans on Feb 6, 2010 5:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you upgrade it is not change for change's sake.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 5:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah it scares the shit out of me too.
Tomorrow we can argue incessantly about John Wall if you like.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe I didn't explain well enough
or maybe I did and you still disagree ;). Let me try an example:
Say somehow we’re able to get Tyrus Thomas this offseason with the cap space we have. To me, not getting Iggy means we now have Kevin Martin and Tyrus Thomas (which in combination are better than just having AI2)
Maybe you did get it and still disagree. No worries, I do seethat the point of assuming there’s a better deal down the road may be flawed
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Precisely.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i personally don't see the $3 million more a year as making him harder to move. I think the perception around the league is that he is better than Martin and therefore i think he would be just as hard to move as martin in the long run
as for the cap space, seems to me that the Kings still have cap space in 2011 (obviously not in 2010 so that door would be completely closed). I think they are taking on more talent and i think it’s worth not signing a free agent this summer. that’s about it. i know they are not going to win a ton more games but i do think they will be better and won’t mortgage the future for it
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The part where the CBA is going to drop is the other part of this.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and that is frickin important
and that’s actually why i asked the other day about exactly when it drops
i thought in the summer of 1998 we signed Vlade, then the strike went into affect. Was it the other way around? I know the rookie contracts went from 3 years guaranteed to two years guaranteed to two qualifying offers but i didn’t recall exactly what happened with the free agents from that summer
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We signed Vlade after the strike was over.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
remember when we traded webber for 3 players that would allegedly be easier to move? how many people wish we had never traded webber and just let him expire?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Those people are very wrong and don't understand the full implications of that deal.
So that’s that.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i would have been very upset if we kept him
plus, could you imagine the left over venom and anger that would have hung around this team?
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i think we traded him the year before the expiring contract craze began right?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There was never a better deal out there. Despite what some think.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How are the Kings putting all their eggs into one basket with Kevin Martin right now?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The situation between Martin and Evans isn’t working out right now and Martin seems like he’s on a downward trend. His contract has value now. If we wait a season or 2, his value might not be as high as it is now. We wouldn’t get max returns for Martin…especially when there’s buyers out there for Martin, right now.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i want to focus on this one statement if we could
when you say we have buyers for martin, which ones are you referring to?
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Off the top of my head
Boston and Dallas have vocalized their interest already.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
take your time, don't have to be in a rush
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Add Houston and Cleveland
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay so far we got a list of
Boston (i assume Ray Allen?)
Dallas (Josh Howard)
Houston (McGrady)
Cleveland (Igauskasdfasdfdf)
I don’t know if Okafur counts but can we agree that this is a fairly good list of what type of offers we have gotten for Martin?
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
cloudyeyes, is this a good representation of what offers we are getting for Martin in your eye?
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if the kings trade martin for ray allen i will burn my jersey in the arco parking lot
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, there always can be third teams included in trades, you know. I’m sure GP could work some of his magic.
I’m not really set on any one trade, but the trade listed for this poll is the best trade i’ve seen so far.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For talent yes.
But in terms of monetary risk, there’s a huge part of this that I think some are ignoring because it isn’t their money. The Maloof’s, IMO, are not in a position to roll the dice on a player that isn’t going to sell major tix to fans upon his arrival. I like Iggy as a player, but he is not Allen Iverson in terms of popularity.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
neither is k-mart anywhere but here. once iggy starts catching alley-oops from tyreke he'll be fine
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well you have Martin already.
It’s a moot point.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i agree. i dont want to trade him. but igoudala is a much better all around player
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Now I'm not saying K-Mart's going to turn into K-9
I’m just saying his value looks like it’s diminishing to the point where he seems he could eventually be overpaid, relative to his contract.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Is it because he's had bad games after returning from injury?
Honest question, not trying to mock your assumption
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
Considering our run after he came back from injury, one has to thing something’s wrong. On paper, I’ll confess Evans and Martin are supposed to be a good fit. The team seems broken right now and I’m seeing Martin miss wide open layups. That terrifies me.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
not all his fault. whole team gone to crap. also the schedule has gotten much more difficult.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I honestly don't understand what you mean by
“his value is diminishing” and this didn’t help me.
So, a bad Kings team is losing games and he has had sme bad games. Is that it?
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
Refer to the post below, as well. His shooting percentage has been on the decline over his career, as well.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Refer to the reply of that post
that talks about true shoting percentage and Kevin taking more shots because of the lack of talent on the Kings
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I have to disagree
The talent has been consistently declining during the past 5 years. From the Artest/Bibby era, to when he was the lone scorer, to now, when he’s paired with Evans.
Sure, one could argue that defenses are increasingly focused on Martin over those years, thus causing a decrease in his shooting %. However, teams aren’t really focusing on him this year. This season has been a wash and Martin will be 28 next year. I’m not sure if I’d want to wait a few more years to find out where this goes.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not about defenses focusing on him
It’s simple, the more shots you take, the more shots you have a chance of missing.
And he may be 28 next year but how many “miles” does he really have on him? Isn’t that a better question?
I’m not arguing not to trade him, I’m arguing that you think he’s declining.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not really
His decreased shooting percentage is irrelevant IMO. Here are his points scored per shot attempt in his career:
04-05 1.15
05-06 1.42
06-07 1.52
07-08 1.58
08-09 1.55
09-10 1.27
I don’t see any kind of “consistent decline” there. Unless you want to focus solely on this season – and this year’s numbers are over 17 games…or as we like to call it around here – SSS.
So it’s pretty obvious that Martin’s offense hasn’t suffered despite the decline in his shooting percentage.
You can choose to disregard these numbers, as well as TS% if you like, but I wouldn’t recommend it.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 5:50 PM PST up reply actions 6 recs
Agreed.
Well done Otis.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can understand your concern about Kevin Martin
Admittedly, he is coming back from an injury and trying in to fit into a team that has changed. However, how long should it take for someone to fit back in? I really thought this would be a non-issue by now, but it is not. I think that it is a legitimate concern at this point. Some have contemplated that perhaps he wants to be traded. I don’t think anyone really knows what is going on with him right now.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 6:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Martin is great personally.
But this trade gives us upgrades at telent, durability, and defense at the cost of salary.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 6:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i agree
and at the same time i think it has to just be left at that.
anything short of building a flux capasitor and stealing some plutonium from the Libians, I don’t think we are going to be able to convince people that it’s worth it. But I also think that’s okay.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 6:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
flux capacitor^ Libyans^
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I see what he means though
If we trade Kevin Martin and a bunch of expirings for a player Whats the point because are we going to be contenders with dalembert and Iguodala no. But we will certaintly be better, but is it worth trading away all that and taking away minutes from younger guys and affecting their growth. Because if make this trade we won’t be successful and there won’t be a ton of cap space and roster space seeing as we would have a lot of 2-3 year deals and guys who demand minutes, so it will also clog the roster. Which option is better, make the trade now and be a moderately successful team, or continue the way we are, and have faith in the young guys to play well and improve and make us a good team.
by MJ5 on Feb 6, 2010 5:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we should keep Kevin Martin unless you can get a good player and good draft picks for him and trade Francisco Garcia and Nocioni for expirings and cap relief
by MJ5 on Feb 6, 2010 5:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
good luck finding anyone who wants cisco's contract
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
CloudyEyes, sorry about picking on you about this but i think it's important
The situation between Martin and Evans isn’t working out right now and Martin seems like he’s on a downward trend. His contract has value now. If we wait a season or 2, his value might not be as high as it is now. We wouldn’t get max returns for Martin…especially when there’s buyers out there for Martin, right now.
Could you please explain to me what value Kevin Martin has now? At this moment, it appears he has the value of an expiring contract and that’s it. I personally don’t see that as much value for a guy who can do what he does. I also don’t see how that value could be any lower in the next two years. If he sucks next year I am pretty sure we would be stuck having to trade him and maybe an expiring contract (like nocioni).
I’m okay with trading him for value but let’s not jump the gun just because we are all scared about his performance. If nothing comes around that’s worth trading for, then wait.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ug sorry again, not my day
The situation between Martin and Evans isn’t working out right now and Martin seems like he’s on a downward trend. His contract has value now. If we wait a season or 2, his value might not be as high as it is now. We wouldn’t get max returns for Martin…especially when there’s buyers out there for Martin, right now.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the teams that want him have nothing to give back that is remotely close to value. igoudala is the best player anyone has talked about getting in return
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if this is in response to me
yes iggy is the best value and i actually would be fine with that, this isn’t a negative iggy trade comment
i just wanted to emphasize the fact that the notion “we must trade Kevin now before his value drops” is based on false assertions. Remember, this Iggy thing is not coming from a rumor, this is just random conjecture. So far we have only heard concrete rumors involving bad contracts
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Which brings me to the conclusion...
This is the best realistic trade I’ve heard for Martin, lately. If someone has a better trade, I’m all ears.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ok i was just talking about the general premise about how he has value only now
alot of people have been using that to even argue for the josh howard and ray allen trades. i just wanted to point out that the notion that we have to make such trades right away is horrible. Now the iggy one is a bit fair and i actually don’t think it’s based simply on “the team is losing we need to rearrange chairs on the Titantic” type logic. I think people really think he has value
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In terms of value for a big guy
Martin has the value of a big-man averaging a double double, or close to it. …About a David Lee, probably.
by CloudyEyes on Feb 6, 2010 5:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and it is a sad state of affairs that no one would even trade a bum like david lee for him
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I just wanted to say
this has been a great thread by all concerned, those I agree with and those that are misguided…I mean those I don’t.
:-)
Seriously, great thread everyone.
Free Omri...trade.Noc.
by ForThree on Feb 6, 2010 3:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
darn good thread
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 3:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Iguodala is one of the best defenders in the league, a good passer, and a superb rebounder. Martin is good, but is mainly a one-trick pony. No matter how good of a scorer he is, the all-around brilliance Iguodala makes this a must.
#52 #10 #25 #7
by Cablinasian on Feb 6, 2010 3:39 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Aren't you among the same group that argues that Durant's brilliance isn't that big of a deal because of his poor passing?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 3:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ouch. really?
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 3:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately yes.
Cab is still a very thoughtful intelligent fellow and his opinion is a worthwhile one. I just don’t agree with his (& primarily Morty’s take—both are from Bedge) about Durant.
This isn’t a simple transaction in the same way the thought of acquiring Okafor isn’t a simple transaction.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 3:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Durant is a great player, I just don’t think he’s in the upper tier of NBA stars. When you have a usage of over 30 and have had more turnovers than assists in every NBA season, there is an issue there. Can he resolve it? Sure. But I have a hard time seeing transcendent, NBA Champion talents in NBA history who had USG% nearly triple their AST%.
It’s not just Durant. I’m not as big a Kevin Martin or Danny Granger fan as most.
Could Durant be great with, say, a Tyreke Evans beside him? That’s different. I take Tyreke over Durant.
#52 #10 #25 #7
by Cablinasian on Feb 6, 2010 4:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well i hope your right
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 4:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he does not have many teammates that are good on Offense.
He is most of their offense which results in him having to be so high usage.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 4:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep & yep.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the usage isn’t the problem, it’s his Outlaw/Gay esque passing to go with the usage.
#52 #10 #25 #7
by Cablinasian on Feb 6, 2010 5:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If Durant played on a higher quality offensive team it would be a problem.
But OKC’s offense sucks.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
cant we just trade beno and noc for durant? those euros would love oklahoma
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes absolutely.
Saves OKC from having to sign Durant to a contract extension.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sweet. long time listener. first time caller.
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately Noc is SouthAmerican
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
im sure he comes from a long line of nazi war criminals hiding in argentina
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So are you admitting that you really are Mexican Eddie?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I have no idea
what does have to do with anything, but sure. Why not?
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm mostly amusing myself.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah but i would trade martin for durant too...
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
would there be a better defensive backcourt in the league than reke and andre?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Question
You all know I am a hige K-mart fan. I love having a great outside shooter to team with Martin. But . . .
05-06 480
06-07 473
07-08 456
08-09 420
09-10 383
These are K-Mart’s shooting stats for the last five years. As you can see, his best year was his second in the NBA as far as pure shooting %. His three point shooting has improved and he has drawn a few more fouls per game over that same stretch. But his games played, obviously have gone down. We talk about Iggy being hard to trade, but if K-Mart’s shooting percentage is on teh decline (I do say IF), his value could slide as well.
I had to think a lot about this deal. But ultimately, I voted yes. If it was a straight K-Mart for Iggy deal. I say no. So if we don’t keep SammyD, the deal has MUCH less value in my opinion. I think a quality rebounding shot-blocking big man is a must for us. And Iggy and K-Mart are very close in value. We become much better on defense. We rebound better. We pass very well. I think this is a go for me.
All of that being said, I like the deal MUCH better of we replace K-9 with Noc. Obviously, the 76ers want cap space. So we trade Noc, K-Mart, and some filler to them. They then send Noc and K-Mart to Dallas for expirings, and we end up with a solid front five and some cap space.
"And I never said I don’t like KMart. I just don’t think the duo is good for the team. They are essentially two of the same player"
Sammyp831.
by SavageBeast on Feb 6, 2010 4:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I remember a few discussions on this a couple years back
Most everyone felt that Kevin wasn’t taking as many shots as he needed to – he was only taking the absolute best shots available within the offense.
The fact that he became the focal point of the offense (and the opposing defenses) means he was taking more shots, and taking tougher shots. I fully expected his shooting percentage to decline over time.
But this is where true shooting percentages become important IMO. Kevin is a better three point shooter than he was, and that’s a pretty big deal. And his ability to get to the line and make free throws has really made his declining shooting percentage less of an issue. His TS % for the same periods:
05-06 .604
06-07 .614
07-08 .618
08-09 .601
09-10 .532
This year has been a concern with him…certainly. But in the grand scheme of things (and at his age) it’s likely statistical noise.
I do agree with your other points.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 4:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
I’m not worried about this year at all—although maybe I should be. His scoring per game has gone up every year but this year along with his true shooting %. You can see why Dallas is salivating over him. Can you imagine how good he would be with Kidd as his PG as Dirk taking most of the defensive heat?
"And I never said I don’t like KMart. I just don’t think the duo is good for the team. They are essentially two of the same player"
Sammyp831.
by SavageBeast on Feb 6, 2010 4:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
As much as I hate to say it SB
I would heavily have to consider trading Speed with Noc to Dallas because of the financial implications.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 4:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just out of curiosity for all the veterans here
Wasn’t around here for the trade deadline stuff last year. Just curious about (i) how did people value Brad Miller as a trade asset last year (was everyone begging for it? did everyone think the Kings were going to get JJ Hickson?) and (ii) how did everyone felt about the Brad Miller trade right when it happened?
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 4:17 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think
Most people knew it was going to be a salary dump. We didn’t expect to get much of anything back. In fact, a lot of us were suprised we actually found a taker for Brad.
"And I never said I don’t like KMart. I just don’t think the duo is good for the team. They are essentially two of the same player"
Sammyp831.
by SavageBeast on Feb 6, 2010 4:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think people were more frustrated by Salmons getting so little more than anything else.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 4:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Right
"And I never said I don’t like KMart. I just don’t think the duo is good for the team. They are essentially two of the same player"
Sammyp831.
by SavageBeast on Feb 6, 2010 4:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And add the end
the feeling was that we needed to add package Salmons with Brad, just to be able to get Brad out of here. It worked out at the end I would think.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 4:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Even if we don't move Noc at some point it still worked out for the Kings in the long run.
As strange as that sounds.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 4:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wasn't around town here but from far away
I was sort of confused about the need to dump brad miller only because i felt like JT and Spencer should each be able to at least get 24 minutes a game as it was.
But then again I didn’t realize just how bad the money sitaution was for the Maloofs. I find it kind of funny that they spent $2 million on making the court look like it’s on fire (new graphics in the stadium) and then everything went down the crapper right after. Might not have been the smartest move.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 4:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Brad (and John to a lesser extent)
Weren’t the best clubhouse guys – the body language was bad, Brad’s desire to play here seemed to be waning. I think there was some “addition by subtraction” going on there.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 4:42 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
If you look at it from "addition by subtraction"
It’s amazing the Kings ever won games with Salmons or BradBaby.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Brad thing reminded me of Adelman
I think both parties were ready for the breakup.
Having said that, I was always a Brad supporter – I think he did the things on the court to facilitate the offense that nobody else could on that team. Even when it looked like Brad was playing poorly, the results always seemed to be a bit better when he was on the court.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i dont remember... what did the kings actually end up with after all those trades last year? only nocioni rght? did they save any money?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Over the life of the contracts no.
With what was due Salmons and Miller this year, yes.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 5:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
they saved money on the short term i know that
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but they didnt get millers expiring this year. he is expiring isnt he?
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
I think Iggy kills KMART in every aspect besides scoring. I would not give up sergio, perhaps Hilton instead. Samuel is overpaid, but I like the fact that he would be a $12million expiring contract next year. That would be a great trade chip for a team looking for interior D going into the playoffs.
by elSAVinator on Feb 6, 2010 4:48 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i would trade sergio for a 7 ft tall bag of doritos to just put a jersey on and set in the paint...
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Think about a lineup of
Tyreke, Iguodala, Udoka, Donte and Dalembert. If you had to stop the other guys at the end of the game this would be good.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 5:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Think about this lineup
Tyreke, Martin, Casspi, Thompson, and Hawes. If you had to score on the other guys at the end of the game this woudl be good
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think
If the above two lineups played each other for 48 mins, the defensive lineup wins
by chenp22 on Feb 6, 2010 6:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Because defenses wins championships
< / whistling at Mark Jackson’s infallible logic >
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not only that,
But I actually think the defensive lineup is a pretty good offensive lineup…Well better than that offensive lineups defense.. If that even makes sense..
by chenp22 on Feb 6, 2010 6:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The idea that defense wins championships is complete bullshit.
Great teams on 2 ends of the ball win championships. The end.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and as composed the kings suck balls on D... with iggy and dalembert they are hugely improved on D without really losing a ton of scoring. They averaged over 100 a game w/o kmart in teh first place
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 6:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 6:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
On the plus side
I think its possible for the kings to go 2-1 on this 3 game road trip. But then again im pretty optimistic being a kings fan..
by chenp22 on Feb 6, 2010 6:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not arguing this again.
I’ve already addressed this.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 7:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You have to look at the whole game.
We have had this lineup this season and lost. Why? Poor defense. We can score just fine, but if we don’t keep the other team from scoring more than we do, then it won’t come down to the end of the game.
I agree with chenp22. The defensive lineup wins.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 6:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i think if you are going to trade martin, a guy like igoudala is the least you take back...
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:16 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Tried the trade out on 2k10
Went from 24 wins to 29 haha
by elSAVinator on Feb 6, 2010 5:20 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
hmmm... now its just costing us ping pong balls...
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Like last year when we had the most
and got the 4th pick ha
by elSAVinator on Feb 6, 2010 5:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
worked out ok. in the end that saved us money!
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
holy crap
is it just me or did stuff get really crazy in here for a few minutes
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:48 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i was typing the Z button like crazy
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
holy crap i didnt know that did anything... i just tried it... FREAKING AWESOME!!
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i've been scrolling all these months
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I knew there was such shortcut
but couldn’t remember. Thanks Wally, you just made StR even better for me
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 5:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
nobody bothered to read the guide stuff when they joined?
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
only the people who read the guide to ANYTHING they buy
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Z button
It’s the greatest invention in the history of mankind. – Bill Walton
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 5:57 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
i made a post about signing darius miles just to screw over the blazers on my first day. happy times...
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 5:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i have yet to do my first post
i have no clue what i would talk about
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 6:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
On my first post
I said that Beno, Kevin, Donte, JT, and Hawes was our lineup of the future and tried to guess what Petrie’s plans were for the 2010 offseason. We’re almost there.
Beno our PG of the future…. ohh god!!
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 6:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jerry Reynolds and Geoff Petrie struck out on that one a bit too.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol, awesome
someday when i have enough time and stop making a million typos I would like to do a debate type post with someone. One where we can post oppositve views on something. Nothing off limits, whatever insults we feel like using in our arguments, we just can’t go into the comments on the bottom (at least not until it’s over). We each take three stabs at each other, back and forth and that’s it.
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 6:10 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
JJ & I are in the process of doing that very thing.
But if you like, you can always do it with JJ instead of me.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's up to JJ however.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah ask me in about 2 months
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 6:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well JJ & I have been trying to do this for the last 3 months.
Never as simple as one thinks it might be.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
actually i would think it incredibly difficult
and something were you really have to stick with a schedule nomatter what and just plug along.
by the way, what were you two going to debate?
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 6:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's a secret.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gah me and G have been planning this as well.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement, Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order, and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
by Aykis16 on Feb 6, 2010 8:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Of course you have.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 9:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
talk about how awesome marcus johnson would look in a kings uni...
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 6:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
boy that esculated quickly. I think i saw pookey kill a man. Did he throw a trident?
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 5:51 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Yes.
I got some prawns too. You hungry?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It got real crazy for a few minutes there.
To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.
by Slam_Dunk on Feb 6, 2010 6:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If you just jump in,
And start pressing Z.. You gotta press Z forever. I dont know if Ill ever catch up to the live feed.
by chenp22 on Feb 6, 2010 6:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
you can shift -a it
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 6:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Shift-a for the large threads that I haven’t looked at yet…then I can skim some of the threads, and then catch the new comments as they come in.
I’ve gotta admit, SBN has a lot of nice tools.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 6, 2010 6:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Is this all in the welcome guide
I need to learn some of this stuff
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
by edm7 on Feb 6, 2010 7:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not really.
The blockquote/bullet point/number listing you already know how to do righ Ed? (If you don’t, just look at the comment guide in the bottom comment box at the bottom of the thread. It will show you there.) The how to mark comments is actually at the very top of the commenting section right below the main text of the post.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 7:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Most of this stuff
I learned over time just from people in the thread comments.
"When you look at him, you say: 'Holy God.'" - Pete Carril on Tyreke Evans
by otis29 on Feb 7, 2010 5:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's why I don't do it. I do mark the lot of comments read on a rare occasion though.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 6:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Does anybody here check out hoopsanalyst.com?
The guy running it has DeMarcus Cousins as the top prospect and John Wall … wait for it …. wait for it … FOURTH!
Now that is ballsy
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 6:29 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
with our luck in teh lottery that means he is coming to us!!!! yeah!!!!
At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.
by TrojanCBB on Feb 6, 2010 6:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He didn't even spell Derrick Favors first name right.
Yes, that’s picky, but if you can’t figure out how a guys name is spelled perhaps you’re not all that astute. (I realize Dwyane is not how you usually spell Dwayne, but, does that mean Dwyane Wade is crazy?)
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 7:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No
It just means his momma is crazy.
by kingsfan300 on Feb 6, 2010 7:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone's momma is crazy.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 8:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Late to the thread
great read because there are compelling well thought out arguments on both sides.. The whole post is rec’d.
I voted No. Though the clock appears to be ticking slower, it is not. Adding Iggy and Sammy for Keviny and Kenny and Hitony will hasten the rebuild, but not by much, and certainly not at all for the Sixers, who would be waving the white flag on their season. It’s the East, it’s Philly, I don’t see it happening.
The Kings need talent but they also need to conserve cost. That is the one thing that has not changed from last season. The Kings are playing with house money as far as improvement goes. They have already shown they are a better team. They have already shown the promise of a brighter future with the RoY (Evans) and an All-Rookie selection in Casspi. Why spend more? With the CBA about to change in the summer of 2011 the Kings will play “wait and see” before adding more to their bottom line.
by betweentheeyes on Feb 6, 2010 7:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Anyone else catching the Houston - Philly game?
Was just thinking about Iggy vs Ariza.. Who would you take for the kings salary/talent wise if you had the choice?
by chenp22 on Feb 6, 2010 7:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ariza
i like to pay for my dunks on the cheap, much like my hookers
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 7:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ariza’s def longer and slicker. Iggy’s stronger. but there pretty similar players..IMO Either one of them could help the kings.
by chenp22 on Feb 6, 2010 7:47 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I am untrusting of Ariza's attitude
particularly if he is traded halfway through his “big” season. Iggy > Ariza. Further, Ariza is a 3.
by betweentheeyes on Feb 6, 2010 7:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you trying to advocate patience too?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 7:52 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I am one dimensional in that regard
by betweentheeyes on Feb 6, 2010 7:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Me too.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 8:15 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
even with all of this hand wringing
I can still clap.
I will break out the tissues and disgust in two seasons if nothing much changes.
(of course, I lie, I will probably still say the same thing)
by betweentheeyes on Feb 6, 2010 8:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I won't be.
I’ll be upset as all hell if there isn’t progress in 2011-12. But, it’s 2009-10. I can be patient for the time being waiting for the better days on the horizon.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 8:19 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I do not think this trade makes the Kings impatient.
I think it is better for the long-term since we get a younger better SG out of the deal.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 8:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Iggy has more talent I agree.
But SpeedRacer is a different player than AI2.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 9:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
technically i was ansering this question in a vacuum
people it’s pretty pointless
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 7:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
SB Nation really needs to come up with a spell check
either that or i actually try to learn how to type
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 7:55 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
be like me
It’s not my fault, it is my keyboard’s.
by betweentheeyes on Feb 6, 2010 7:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Firefox has spellcheck.
But it does not work in the reply/comment titles for some reason.
by mayfieldcol on Feb 6, 2010 8:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes it does
It works in the comment section for me; I even mistakenly thought it was a SBNation feature at one point.
I’m currently using version 3.6, but it’s worked in past versions as well.
by smgmatt on Feb 6, 2010 9:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You know you're going to have to sound off right smg?
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 9:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bah
I was waiting for Section to comment so I could just agree with him and move on. I don’t really have anything new to add that wasn’t said in the first ~500 comments. ;-)
I think Aykis (below) summed up my thoughts fairly well with this line:
…I would not be against this trade if it happened, although I will not advocate for it.
I will add that it would be hard for me to see Martin flourish somewhere else; even though I’d be happy for him, I think we’d all like to see him make the All Star Team representing the Kings. That said, I’d be willing to move him to improve the team long-term.
I’ll end with an old classic: if Geoff Petrie made this deal, then I’m sure I’d support it because I trust his judgment more so than my own (for the record, I voted “NO”).
In Petrie We Trust, right?
by smgmatt on Feb 6, 2010 9:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Mmmm More or less yes.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 9:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm thinking hookers is one of the few things I go "top shelf" on every time.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 8:58 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
i think i have given anotherstupidsn more assists than tyreke has had all season
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 10:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's what ASSN does
He puts down the simple lobs with no effort.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I do have trouble creating my own shot
at least that’s the scouting report on me.
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 11:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Better than shooting all over.
I hear that creates tension in unwanted areas.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 11:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
NaPG
"Sometimes the capriciousness of youth anesthetizes common sense." -Let Geoff's words guide our patience this season.
by AnotherStupidSN on Feb 6, 2010 11:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i find the vote break down really interesting
seems to me that a majority of the people who are willing to comment are actually thinking the opposite
Could some of you maybe use a condom once in a while?
by wallywagon11 on Feb 6, 2010 7:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Just got off work so its taken me a while to read through the thread
But here’s my opinion for those who care.
Andre Iguodala is a better player than Kevin Martin. I don’t think you can argue that. And Dalembert is exactly the type of player we’ve been looking for to guard the paint. This trade instantly makes the Kings better defensively, and they become more athletic.
So I voted No. Now I want to say yes.
Here are the Cons to me:
- The Kings lose all financial flexibility for 2010 FA market (if they can’t get rid of Noc), and lose out on a guy like Tyrus Thomas as an example.
- Iggy and Tyreke have similar games in which they both slash and kick out to shooters, and both aren’t very good shooters themselves. Teams are going to pack the paint every time down the court and if our other shooters are off, that hurts our offense.
- Hurts our lottery pick for this year, because I do think this helps us out in the win department for now. But I don’t think this helps us out too much in the long run.
The Pros to me:
- Upgraded Defense and Athleticism. Speaks for itself.
- Gain an exciting player in Iguodala. Iggy is one of the most fun players to watch in the NBA in my opinion. Kings haven’t had a guy this athletic since Gerald Wallace.
- Iguodala actually has a much SMALLER Usage rate than Kevin Martin. A surprising fact to me, but one that could actually benefit a Tyreke/Iggy backcourt.
- It adds another ballhandler to the backcourt with Tyreke. This was shown to be effective earlier this year when Beno and Tyreke would be paired up.
I just have to say that I would not be against this trade if it happened, although I will not advocate for it. I sort of disagree with Pookey that Iguodala will be hard to trade, because players of that caliber aren’t that hard to trade, especially when they’re not making max money (this could all be moot if player salaries take a big hit in the new CBA).
Father of the "Natt this!" movement, Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order, and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
by Aykis16 on Feb 6, 2010 8:46 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
The new CBA is a big reason why I'm against this.
It’s going to go down, and so are salaries. But that’s precisely when Iggy’s goes up. I don’t think Philly ever thought that it would quite happen that way, but that’s the way the breaks roll sometimes.
I very easily could see a Houston trade that has Iggy & Dalembert going to the Rockets and T-Mac going back to the Sixers and dumping salary.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 9:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dalembert's contract however could be a big boon with the new CBA
seeing as how it expires after next year.
Father of the "Natt this!" movement, Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order, and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
by Aykis16 on Feb 6, 2010 9:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My concern is not the first year of the new CBA.
It’s the 2 years after that. It’s why I wrote it that way.
UNLESS that underground cavern was a David Thorpe run training facility. The problem of course, is that players really need to play in NBA game situations for them to develop well. So a league of cyborgs needs to be built along with a regulation-sized stadium and tons of fake fans to simulate real NBA games to develop the players. Though at this point the team is spending billions of dollars to develop those players, so you know… maybe it would be smarter to just wait. -- Iashwash
by pookeyguru on Feb 6, 2010 9:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 