Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Final Report Card Sacramento Kings 2009-10 Season - Part Four,The Coaches and Front Office

 

82 games,  six months gone and it is time to discuss how the team makes the grade as seen from my eyes.  A full report card is too long so I will break this down into 4 parts. The Core, The Near Core, The Here Todays, The Coaching Staff and Front Office. Today, The Coaching Staff and Front Office

Star-divide

The Coaching staff: Seven members strong led by Head Coach Paul Douglas Westphal with Jim Eyen, Mario Elie, Truck Robinson, Bryan Gates, Shareef Abdur-Rahim and Pete “Coachie” Carril.

An exciting start ended once the new calender arrived. 2010 ended much like last season’s 2009 in the win column. But this is a different team. This team plays through adversity. They don’t win, but it is not for want of trying. Ultimately, all coaches are judged, fairly or not, on wins. That said, it was smart to keep the current staff in place – they are good with the young guys and this team is the among the youngest in the League. The draft and the Vegas Summer League (VSL) will be of patrcular important for this coaching staff.  With just two core players, expecting wins is a bit unfair.  If you don’t think Coach Paul is even average, given the 3rd worst record in the League, look at his contempeories: Saunders, O’Brian, Hughes, Kuester, Jordan, Rambis, KiKi, Neliie on the talent end. Would you want any of these guys in his place? I have to admit some bias, as I really enjoy this guy and I am happy he was given a contract extension. C+ (B)

The Front Office: The Kings hit a grand slam with expected Rookie of the Year and future superstar Tyreke Evans. Casspi petered out in the second half of the year but should be a fine addition, possibly a future starter but not there yet. Extending Coach Westphal and Carl Landry are highlights. The lowlight was  the handling of former face ot the franchise and NBA ambassador Kevin Martin. The radio influence and the coaching interaction may be the outward problem but the responsibiity goes to the Front Office and their stance – often too quiet and uncharateristically lacking in class. The involvement of Dan Fegan and a lot of negative press allude to a contentious undercurrent. It is one of the biggest disappointments of the season.  It seems that every off season has been “the biggest off season ever” but I will still repeat the sentiment.  A high draft pick, no coaching search and a large chunk of money need to translate into more wins ; factor in the 2011 CBA and it is a tough row to hoe.  I like the positioning of the available cash as much as those Cisco, Udrih and Nocioni contracts stand out. With too much cash  (yes, there is such a thing) the Kings would be forced to spend no matter what. Improvement and playing time for the young’uns was the agenda and they held to it.  C+   (B)

Ownership: Overall, the Kings ownership is making the effort to bring fans back to ARCO, working on Arena deals, ticket packages, Fan incentives and dropping John Thomas from the Front Office. The product is still not up to snuff. Given a B for effort. B  (B+)

FINAL GRADE: D+ (C-)

An eight game improvement from last season which is welcome step up. Unfortunately, the second half grade this season was D- (as in dismal). the Kings still sit on the lower rungs of the NBA ladder. Hopes run high, but winning 1/3 of their games leaves much to be desired.  The addition of the expected RoY in Tyreke Evans and the mid season acquisition of Carl Landry make the Kings a bit more promising but the second half of the season had the team in the bottom 3 of the League. This year was about improvement and that gives the Kings a below average grade as the Kings still have one foot on the cellar floor.

(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)

Comment 48 comments  |  12 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Reke'd

For an incredibly well done series.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Apr 18, 2010 9:53 PM PDT reply actions  

With.

Though, maybe the homer in me sees the grades as kinda harsh, but hey, it only gives us more room to grow (and get higher grades).

Tanking? I don't know what you're talking about, tanking. I'm just losing more efficiently.

by elfboy_ on Apr 18, 2010 10:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

You might wish to change how you stated it bte

But PW’s option year on his contract was picked up. No extension was given.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Apr 18, 2010 11:12 PM PDT reply actions  

thanks PG

will do. I am delighted he will be signed for the next two seasons. This team cannot go forward without someone to captain the ship (with the FO to chose the course). Once again, the players are leaderless on the teammate front. Cisco is the de facto leader I suppose. I don’t even know who is the “team captain” this season.

by betweentheeyes on Apr 18, 2010 11:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I had to look it up

the only answer I could find was Kevin Martin

by betweentheeyes on Apr 18, 2010 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would argue that the team leader is Tyreke Evans. Or Cisco.

But how important is team leadership?

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Apr 18, 2010 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

That is a great question

Sometimes it is nothing but a title, sometimes it conveys a sense of purpose to an individual player and thus a team, and a sense of order. It may be media opportunity.

As you often note and I will paraphrase: it matters as much as it may matter which can be nothing at all.

by betweentheeyes on Apr 19, 2010 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

What do you consider leadership?

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Apr 19, 2010 1:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

The player who steps up to be the face of the team for the season

out of necessity, not out of vanity. Usually embraced by teammates and fans alike, vocal in the press and in the locker room.

We don’t have that guy quite yet.

by VenomySnicket on Apr 19, 2010 2:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'd love to meet that player. He don't exist in reality.

And, for instance, Michael Jordan wasn’t that guy.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Apr 19, 2010 2:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

also, that Jordan isn’t one.
Perhaps Lebron comes close to that description?

Dunking Dutchman

by RikSmits on Apr 19, 2010 5:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Puhhhh-leez.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Apr 19, 2010 6:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

there might be a variation of "that guy"

but I think he is mostly created by the media so they can have a narrative for the season

There will never be another Kareem.

by MichaelMack on Apr 19, 2010 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yuh. Bingo!

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Apr 19, 2010 4:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I thought the leader in any basketball team

is the head coach.

Tanking? I don't know what you're talking about, tanking. I'm just losing more efficiently.

by elfboy_ on Apr 19, 2010 4:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

I thought it was Hawes. lol.

by Beer_man on Apr 19, 2010 9:12 AM PDT reply actions  

Great stuff once again BTE

And I like how you don’t give grades just to give them. An A should only be given for having led this team to a playoff berth, etc. You sir, are not soft or mentally weak in any shape or form.

Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".

by Aykis16 on Apr 19, 2010 9:23 AM PDT reply actions  

TWSS.

The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.

by jjham15 on Apr 19, 2010 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Someone must have failed Math Class

Final Grade: C+, C+, B… translates to a D+…

Wonder if you were combining all categories from Core on down, didn’t specify.

If Ziegler blows a save... I'll flag his next post.

by gdub171 on Apr 19, 2010 10:00 AM PDT reply actions  

that would be correct if the team grade was a cummulative mark. It is not. However, you must have failed good manners.

Ever have a great bordeaux? They go wonderfully with a Carl’s Jr. burger. What makes this Grand Cru grand? The classic claret is a blend of five varietals: taken on their own they have their own merits. The strength of the fruit comes from the cabernet sauvignon and the merlot – depending on the region and style this can vary on percentage. But this is not a two man game. To soften the tannins, widen the aromatics blend the acids and round out the flavor you have petit verdot, malbec and cabernet france. On their own they are not worthy of separate bottling. Together, they age and meld and produce a world class wine to excite the nose and dazzle the palate . If one were to grade each component on it’s singular merits a different outcome would arise.
Let’s use a basketball example: The 2004 USA Basketball squad. They were composed of NBA stars, young and established. LeBron James, Carmelo Anthony joined Allen Iverson and Tim Duncan among others, the team was coached by the heralded Larry Brown. Everybody on this squad got an “A” or “A+” ranking. However their cumulative grade was decidedly different. They lost 3 games to international competition: first Puerto Rico (by 19!), Lithuania and Argentia. Their final grade: the bronze medal.

So Mr. Wise and wonderful Golden State Warrior troll, bringer of disdain, bereft of class, devoid of civility, I hope this simple explanation will explain the overall grade.

Oh, and Steph Curry is a great talent, but he failed RoY. Have a nice day! Particularly June 14, 2010.

by betweentheeyes on Apr 19, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Smooooothest

spanking I have ever given witness to.
Also props for correctly utilizing one of the most butchered euphemisms in history in “tough row to hoe.” BTE gets an “A”….!

"What...Me worry!?"

by Sacto_J on Apr 19, 2010 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like wine.

and that was a bare ass spanking with a leather belt.

The Sacramento Convergence concept offers Sacramento, the Central Valley, and the State a solution to feasibly construct a new multi-use Entertainment and Sports Complex.

by jjham15 on Apr 19, 2010 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Im with JJ on this

about wine and the proper spanking

There will never be another Kareem.

by MichaelMack on Apr 19, 2010 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great Series! Rec'd

I love what you did in this series BTE.

I only have one reservation in the above and that is how PW handled the Spencer Hawes thing in the media. That wasn’t mentioned and really was the low point and most disappointing thing about the coaching this year.

I think you got the grade on coaching right… I guess I would add a Citizenship grade and PW would get a D on that one. His display of temper and bad judgement really was a let down.

On that note, I would also give the management/Front Office a bad Citizenship grade for how they let Napear be such a tool and don’t reign him in, e.g. Kevin Martin attacks.

by MustangMBS on Apr 19, 2010 12:47 PM PDT reply actions  

an oversight

I agree – the SpencerGate was a pothole in the road as bad as the reaction was, the remedy was equally positive and I think they cancelled themselves out.
I also agree with the Front Office handling of Kevin Martin as I mentioned in my paragraph above.

by betweentheeyes on Apr 19, 2010 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Will they allow it again?

Who will be Grant’s pissing pole next season?

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Apr 20, 2010 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Spencer is the most obvious target

He’s already butted heads with the team a few times, and he’s in the last year of his contract.

However, Spencer might be the type to get in Napear’s face about it, so Peaches might avoid it altogether. That being the case, I’d go with Donté or JT as the backup plan.

I've got squirrels in my pants!

by otis29 on Apr 20, 2010 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Beno

because he probably doesn’t care enough to squabble and he is not as scary as Nocioni.

by betweentheeyes on Apr 20, 2010 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

but JT and Donte

are close with Tyreke, and that might mean Grant might not be able to stand next to him in the locker room

There will never be another Kareem.

by MichaelMack on Apr 20, 2010 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

This series of posts would make a lot more sense to me

if you would clarify what an example of each letter grade is. by reading the posts, I would infer that the grades for each piece would have to be a legitimate contributor to team success on a scale something like:
A+ = winning a title,
A = contending for a title
B = playoff team
C = shows potential to be useful for a playoff team
D = not helpful to reach playoffs
F = abject failure.

thanks for the interesting read

by TheFifthMookie on Apr 20, 2010 8:28 AM PDT reply actions  

A= means

being Eric Maynor.
There is only one A+ in the whole wide world.

Dunking Dutchman

by RikSmits on Apr 20, 2010 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

lilke all graders throughout the various educational systems and media outlets around the globe

I reserve the right to not have to explain myself or make sense or meaning out of my evaluations. Don’t make me get out my red pen!

Kidding aside that is a reasonable request. Player grades are more on the basis of where they fit in my mind in the scope of the NBA in general and to the Kings in particular. Are they an average NBA player for their position? Do they add more to the team than just their basketball skill ? Do they make their teammates better? If they were on another team with average talent and an average number of wins and losses would they get more or less minutes? Have they shown significant improvement over time, or perhaps digressed? What is their consistency? Do they have a role and do they know it?
The mindset for the Front Office and Coaching is more subjective – do they make the goals of the team well known? Is the team playing to it’s reasonable expectation? Is there a distinctive style of play (if capable)? Are adjustments made throughout the season to tailor player strengths to a winning (or improving) formula? Are the players together as a unit or do they just share laundry? Chemistry – good or bad or imperceptible? Do the coaching staff and managment work together or do they seem to be independent? How is everyone handling adversity? Success? Is there an apparent plan moving forward? Are the steps moving forward meager, indecisive, more financial than personnel oriented, too big, too risky or as best as seems reasonable? Do they inspire confidence from their fan base?

There is more but that is some of what there is to consider off the cuff. Setting strict guidelines is just as confusing as having an abstract system – it will cause as many arguments as quiet controversy; it would be like having each of us describe a sunset: there is more than one answer.

The purpose of this exercise in grading the Kings is to find opinions on players and management at season’s end. We have discussed this team daily with Tom ZIller, esq, with Aykis16’s superb weekly chronicles, and with our general banter. Taken as a whole what do you think of this season?

by betweentheeyes on Apr 20, 2010 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

not so briefly:

based on the scale I described above, I’d go with:

Last Year’s Team: F – abstract failure, multiple blowouts with no effort, rotating cast of coaches, talent dumping trades.

This year’s team:

Starters (loosely):
Tyreke: A – obvious and large impact, played better in his rookie year than his opposition including established stars at his position, and was frequently the best player on the floor for either team. I believe Tyreke can be the superstar on a team that’s competing for a title.

Beno: C+ – I’m not sure Beno is a starter on a playoff team. He’s improved wildly this year from last year (where he’d have been a D at best), but if I compare him to other 2’s or points in the league he doesn’t show very well in comparison

small forward (Donte/Omri/Noc): C – In the future, both Omri and Donte could be legitimate small forwards on playoff teams, but they need to improve (Donte’s presence/focus, Omri’s conditioning). I’m really hopeful about the combination of speed and height for Donte, but it sure seems like something’s missing from his game. Likewise, Omri’s controlled intensity was really nice to see, but the late season fade was troubling. Noc is a horrid fit on this team, and I hear people say how he can be a contributor to a playoff team, probably by being an enforcer/rough type defender and 3 shooter.

Landry: B – I believe Carl would work as a power forward on a playoff team. He scores efficiently but doesn’t rebound well (as we all know on here), what keeps him from being any kind of A to me is that the real contenders have ‘legit’ big men at the 4/5, from Gasol to Perkins, Dwight to Amare, and Carl doesn’t stack up in my mind like those guys do

Spencer: C – Spence shows potential to be a legit playoff contributor. He has basketball skills and IQ, but seems to get pushed around by the ‘legit’ big guys. Maybe he can change despite saying he can’t, and adopts that bull in a chinashop mentality later. As of right now, he’s not a starter on a playoff team, and probably won’t improve enough in the offseason to become one. I think of Spence as “Mehmet Okur-light” sometimes.

Bench:
JT: B- – I want to give JT a C score here, but that list that went about recently put his points/rebounds per game in with some pretty good company, and I wonder if my expectations are too high. I think JT is closer to being a starter on a playoff team than Spencer, and the Kings played well when it was JT and Carl in the 4/5. Foul less, and complain less about the calls!

Brockness: C – I want to see Brockman succeed in the NBA, I like having him on our team, but lack of height and/or hops (dunk competition what?!?) in game and a current lack of a shooting touch hurt his chances. I think his upside is that of a bench/energy guy on a competitor, he’s got some improvements to make to get there though.

Cisco: (INC) – CIsco’s season was ruined by the wrist injury, and he never seemed healed. His contract seems to large. Thinking forward he strikes me as another energy off the bench guy for a competitor, rather than a legit starter at the 2/3.

Ime/May: D – Although both played hard and acted as consummate professionals, I’m not sure either of these guys will be a serious contributor to a winning team.

Coaching/Front Office:
Westphaul: C+ – Westphaul got the guys to play hard all year, and the attitude change in the team was readily apparent. Westphaul also is possibly responsible for some player improvements (specifically thinking of Donte and defense), and is obviously a zillion times better than Natt/Theus was going to be this year. That said, the team’s offensive sets seemed ineffectual often, the constant lineup changes seemed to hurt consistency, and the final plays of the game (with all the 1on1 plays) worried me. Perhaps I’m still stuck on Adelman/Carril ball with all the movement, and its long gone and I should get used to it, but it seemed like something was missing.

Petrie: B – Petries grade here is predicated hiring Westphail, on the draft, and on Kevin’s trade. The Westphaul hiring looks pretty good right now (Rambis anyone?), the draft was phenomenal, as Tyreke is an impact player, and Omri may be one very soon, but the Kevin Martin trade was very troublesome, as the rumblings from around the league indicated that Petrie hadn’t reached out to many organizations that he was available, and seemed like he may have missed out on getting the most value for Kevin, especially considering we also had K9’s expiring, it seemed more draft picks or something could have been gotten with a little more prep. Drafting Tyreke trumps this, so I went with the B

Kings Media and outreaach: D – I strongly considered going for an F in this department this year. Killing the Kayte and Koz pre- an post game shows actually did make me watch a few less games, and letting Grant (recognized everywhere as the voice of the franchise) rant about team assets (Kevin) for weeks on end on public airwaves was really reckless. Saving them from the F was the plethora of artistic billboards around the city as well as the the variety of ticket promotions they ran over the course of the year.

Arena Progress: C+ – Kevin Johnson as mayor has more to do with this than anything, but the identification of various possible plans this year was heartening, especially since some of the plans didn’t involve public fincancing.

Overall Grade: C+ – The team gets a lot of credit in my eyes for committing to the rebuild, getting coaches in here that foster player growth, and going young, young, young. The team appears to have significant long term upside through the improvement of existing players and the upcoming draft, and it has cap room for now. I end the year hopeful that the team will be a playoff team in a couple of years, and retains the ability to develop into a full fledged title contender within 6 years, which, in my opinion, is all you can ask from your team – to have a shot to win it all.

by TheFifthMookie on Apr 20, 2010 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions   4 recs

This is a really well done analysis

Thanks for posting it…

I've got squirrels in my pants!

by otis29 on Apr 20, 2010 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like your comments

and agree generally about the grades excpt for the Beno grade and the Arena which went from nowhere to sunrise.
Beno I thought had an A – year. Graded against his physical and leadership abiltiies I think he maximized both nearly 100%. You can’t grade him against D Wade or Kobe.
This is a problem I have with Player grades; are we grading against the league as a whole, against pieces we think we need to contend for a championship – or against maximizing their personal potential?

I’m a believer in dual grades myself. One grade for how they rate as championship pieces and another as to how well they maximized their individual talents, taking into account their development.

On that basis:

                Personal acheivement Championship Caliber
Tyreke: A A
Beno: A – B (3rd guard)
Hawes: C C – (just hasn’t shown he can be physical – headcase?)
JT: C + C + (3rd big)
Landry: B B – (3rd big/complementary big)
Casspi: B B – (has to prove he can keep grinding)
Greene: B C (7th or 8th man?)
Brockman: C C (4th or 5th big)
Cisco: Inc C (utility guy)

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Apr 20, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

That came out screwy when I hit post

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Apr 20, 2010 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

what no cheerleader rankings?

you must be an imposter – I know you have a MVC candidate.

You are more lenient grader than I though. I think this team needs talent and these guys, for the most part, aren’t there yet.

by betweentheeyes on Apr 20, 2010 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was grading "against what it would take from that position on this team vs. the league"

Obviously no team will be full of superstars, so there’s some leeway.

I like the idea of grading the player in terms of their success versus their potential, and Beno would get an A in that category. I just don’t think he’s the guy who plays 2 guard on a championship contender. Maybe I should have given him a B or B- in the ‘vs league’ rating.

by TheFifthMookie on Apr 20, 2010 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

yes, opinions on Beno can vary widely

with the benefit of last year to compare an “A” for improvement is about right. His ability to score and his passing are all B+ to C+ quality. His defense is D to C, against a B or A level PG he will give up at least as much as he contributes more than 50% of the time. His consistency – what you can expect day in day out, his ability to come in and play to an expected level – also “A”.
Is he a solid PG in the NBA – maybe not upper level, but if you compare him to Ramon Sessions, Steve Blake, Jonny Flynn, Mike Conley Jr, Kyle Lowry, Jordan Farmer – he fits right in and is better than most of these guys – none of these guys have a Yeti

by betweentheeyes on Apr 20, 2010 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

btw Mook

enjoyed your write up. I think your Kings media grade a bit harsh but our experiences and preferences differ.

Good stuff.

by betweentheeyes on Apr 20, 2010 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

The media grade really represented my feelings for the year

I was really bent out of shape about the way things went down at the trade deadline. So, of all the grades I gave, that one was probably the least objective.

I think part of it is that 8 years ago, I couldn’t get enough Kings radio talk, and now, I can’t stand most of it. Maybe they’ve gotten more negative and frustrating, or maybe I’m just done with the local talk radio, I’m not sure.

by TheFifthMookie on Apr 21, 2010 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

we are of a like mind

I have increasingly found sports talk radio disappointing and at the same time find so much pleasure in audio books that I don’t mourn that loss.
On the internet front – I was reading the comments on Sacbee.com/Kings back when Scoop and Kriedler were still on board and was horrified at the vitriol and around the disgruntled attitude exhibited on a daily basis – the most vile sports people on the internet seemed to congregrate there. Angry people spewing angry things. I got very depressed about it – you (we) are often best described by your (our) peer group(s). I hated mine – hence, depression ensued.
Having been a life long NBA fan and a fan of the Kings in Sacramento as our arrivals conincided. I have shared season tickets for 12 years and have attended games every season they have been here. I was so upset about the Sacbee.com commenters I was ready to give up on the Kings and may or may not have found my way over to the Warriors (The SF Chron/Examiner is fish wrap IMO) when I stumbled onto SactownRoyalty.com I was skeptical at first but quickly came to appreciate the combination of stats, information and editorial comment on this site where I can share my Cowpoke passion with the rest of this group.

Don’t lament the direction of the media too much – some of it is information overload, some of it is the unfettered access that a line and a keyboard give to the depth and breadth of society – all without benefit of a filter. Find the highlights, ignore the lowlights (and lowlifes) and savor the passion.

by betweentheeyes on Apr 21, 2010 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

This.

EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Apr 21, 2010 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with your grading.

After the start of the year, it was dismal.

To be the best, you have to do your best. Otherwise, you are only second-rate.

by Slam_Dunk on Apr 20, 2010 11:06 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
A Learning Experience on Loyalty For Sacramento Via Golden State
Lionel_small
#HereWeStay
Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration (UofL days)
Kings_sports_illustrated_small
Funny story
Small
As I sit here and watch the OKC Thunder come back against the Lakers
Waymantisdale-tz-150_small
the owners called down the thunder
Chief_petty_officer_small
Maturity in Sacramento Debacle
Small
Ryan Anderson to the Kings - Petrie's Gotta Give It A Thought
Chief_petty_officer_small
Open letter to the Maloofs
Small
Middle Ground on the Roster Situation

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G