Wolves Offering J.Flynn & 2 First-Round Picks
Assuming they weren't expecting Danny Granger in return with the 10th, would this be worth our 5th pick?
almost 2 years ago
haze0945
40 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Deal...
Kings get- J.Flynn, Jefferson, 16th, 23rd
Wolves get- 5th, Landry, (Garcia or Beno), 33rd
KINGS WILL BE 10-11 CHAMPIONS
Don Dadda
Kings get Flynn, 16th and 23rd
Minny gets 5th and 33rd
I'm not sitting in your car, or your living room with a gun pointed to your head telling you to listen to 1140. - Grant Napear
But if they trade Flynn, who the hell is their point guard
Maybe they think by getting rid of Flynn, Rubio will come play for them?
I'm not sitting in your car, or your living room with a gun pointed to your head telling you to listen to 1140. - Grant Napear
Rubio isnt coming this year
one more year on his deal and he already admitted he will not negotiate a buyout with his spanish club
"I have missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I have lost almost 300 games. On 26 occasions I have been entrusted to take the game winning shot...and missed. And I have failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why... I succeed." Michael Jordan.
by Surprise Team on Jun 21, 2010 9:28 PM PDT up reply actions
Sessions
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 21, 2010 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Last year's number #6, this year's 16 and 23 for this years' #10?
Huh?
Well, they have given up quickly on a supposedly talented player in Flynn and if he stays, he will have little loyalty and confidence – two of his previously noted positvies.
What an odd deal. Am I missing something?
That would be a huge "no" then
I’d take 16, 23 and Flynn for my #10
Heartbeat
Something else must be the dealbreaker
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Jun 22, 2010 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah they've been after Granger for a while.
But Bird denied their last (known) attempt, which was a straight Big Al-Granger swap.
Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
Nice
But can Flynn and Tyreke both play together?
I think so
Flynn can shoot and defend (although his small size makes it tough against Reke type PGs). I’d be very tempted to do that deal. Get Flynn, Whiteside & Crawford or something similar. Would be interesting.
After the trade the Kings could package the picks to get a lottery pick and draft a big
Fuck the Lakers...Oh sorry the Fakers
nevermind its a deep draft
and Whiteside could still be available. They could draft a decent forward and a center.
Fuck the Lakers...Oh sorry the Fakers
Flynn, Whiteside, George or Anderson?
Flynn
Reke
Casspi
Landry
Sam
Whiteside, George or Anderson, Cisco, Beno, JT, etc…
Flynn became a favorite of mine, not from his numbers at the combine or anything like that, just the fact that he is a competitor and will run his body dry of sweat for his team to win a game.
We have two point guards already
Flynn isn’t an upgrade.
"I know we certainly gave up a lot to get him, but we do have other players on the perimeter who we can plug in. We haven’t had anybody who we feel is a go-to guy in the post. So we gave up a lot to get a lot, and we’re real excited about adding Carl." - Paul Westphal
I just asked this on real gm and kingsfanforum and pretty much got told I was crazy, but you know what Petrie can do with draft picks and if cousins isn’t there wouldn’t you want to add multiple good players rather than just one great one and a decent one at 33? You’d essentially get a lotto pick from last year a pretty good big at 16 a SG with potential at 23 that sounds good to me.
by da3ptspecialist on Jun 21, 2010 9:40 PM PDT reply actions
I'd rather get a shot at great players
We have plenty of good players already; you’d just be adding to the logjam. Better to upgrade, add a role player where necessary or stand pat.
"I know we certainly gave up a lot to get him, but we do have other players on the perimeter who we can plug in. We haven’t had anybody who we feel is a go-to guy in the post. So we gave up a lot to get a lot, and we’re real excited about adding Carl." - Paul Westphal
The Wolves possibly trading Flynn
Color me completely not shocked.
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
Me too......
But they made the offer, & It’s no way, they were expecting Granger in return. And aside from Granger, I feel we are way better at every position than the Pacers are. So we have more to offer in return, to go along with a higher draft pick. I think for the 5th & Landry, we could get both Flynn & Jefferson.
Flynn/Beno
Reke/Garcia
Greene/Casspi
Jefferson/JT
Dalembert/16th pick
Playoffs here we come!
KINGS WILL BE 10-11 CHAMPIONS
Yeah I want no part of that
Please note the 11 next to my name. All others are frauds.
by wallywagon11 on Jun 21, 2010 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions
I would rather have Flynn with Reke
Evans struggled with the smaller and quicker guards around the league like Jennings, Rondo, and Brooks.
I think Flynn would be a great backcourt partner who is quick and strong enough to guard those smaller guards. He could be our Avery Bradley with less overall skill.
Avery Bradley may have more skill, maybe not
Flynn was a bonafide high rated PG in a heavy PG draft. I believe the Kings rated him highly. However, the Kings are drafting “big” unless I misunderstood JR.
by betweentheeyes on Jun 21, 2010 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions
My understanding is that if Reke was gone
Flynn would’ve been a King.
Grandmaster of the "Never let AnotherStupidSN forget what a Sham-Wow is" Order and Originator of the "Brock Ness Monster".
The triangle is all wrong for Flynn
or any PG really.
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
by lietothegirls on Jun 22, 2010 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions
The way I understand this,
Indy offered the #10 pick for Flynn, and the Wolves said no. So eveidently, the Wolves see Flynn as worth at least the 9th pick in the draft. If that is the case, the scenarios being tossed around here are ludicrous.
Let’s try fair value – the #5 and the #33 for Flynn and the #23. I wouldn’t do that deal, but that is roughly fair value for a PG that played reasonably well in his rookie year for a very bad team, especially when the 2010 draft is bereft of true PG talent, John Wall notwithstanding.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Which is better?
Flynn + 16th pick
Collison + 11th pick
My only problem is their size. I’ve said it over & over, but if he were available, I’d give up the 5th pick in a heartbeat for OJ Mayo.
KINGS WILL BE 10-11 CHAMPIONS
Definitely Collison + 11
I like the idea of pairing a big guard with Reke, but you still have the option of pairing him with Beno, Garcia, and even Donte/Casspi if the matchup calls for it. Collison brings the playmaking and outside shooting to make an idela pairing. I think it could be a great move if NO were interested.
I'm assuming you'd take a big at 11, Who?
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
It is like an Agatha Christie novel. First there were four:
@ #5 Draft Rubio – can’t and/or won’t come over
@ #6 Draft Flynn – trade him after one year
@ #18 Darft Lawson – trade him to Denver
@ #21 Draft Collison – trade him to New Orleans
abracadabra – they are all magically gone. Khaaaaaaan!!!!
by betweentheeyes on Jun 21, 2010 10:27 PM PDT up reply actions
its amazing
that Kahn help on to the only 2 PG’s in the entire draft that didn’t have a really good rookie year. Not saying that Flynn or Rubio would won’t be good, but they are definetly not starting on a great note compared to the others
Phil Jackson, after treatment for a kidney stone "When the anesthesiologist leaned over me, he said "We named your kidney stone Kobe because it's not passing."
I like Granger
But I’m not really keen to doing this. I can see why Minny would offer that though.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985......
Maybe we should adjust our stats to per36 years of age? -- ElRonToro
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....















