Justifying the contracts of the Summer of 2010 - FA Palooza
Joe Johnson - 6 years 120 million +
Rudy Gay - 6 years 84 million
Drew Gooden - 5 years 32 million
Amir Johnson - 5 years 34 million
Brad Miller - 3 years 15 million
Amare, Boozer, Pierce, Allen getting all max or near max deals....etc.
Most people ask, what is going on in the NBA today? What are these owners thinking? They're just throwing money around like it's is 2006. Aren't we in 'the worst economy since the Great Depression?" What could they possibly be thinking by throwing around long term big deals to such old and marginal players???
That's the billion dollar question!
I get it. I think I figured out what these NBA owners are doing. This being the last year of the CBA, heading into negotiations the Union and the owners are going to be fighting for every last penny moving forward. However, what Billy Hunter doesn't get, is that he's about to be played, and played well.
The conventional wisdom is the nba revenues went up, owners are spending like drunken sailor and the players are the lifeblood of the league. However, in pressing this argument, he's playing right into these owners plans. Albeit, not ALL are on board, but if you take a look around, a lot of the small market teams are paying through the nose currently for marginal talent, Minnesota, Milwaukee, Toronto(I know they're not small, but they're small for USA marketing standards and revenue) are paying some exorbitant contracts PURPOSEFULLY.
I mean, really, this is the cycle to BREAK the Union and give the owners the leverage they've lacked on the revenue of their league for decades now. Unlike, their NFL counterparts, the NBA is strapped with guaranteed contracts, long and expensive contracts and a luxury tax to attempt to level the playing field. What these owners are doing is taking a couple steps backwards, in order to move a mile forward. How? Through patience. Through their plan. By giving out the large contracts NOW of all times, they're going to have the leverage in these negotiations. They're going to be able to sit back and wait for THE CBA to be what THEY want it to be. With these large, long term lucrative contracts doled out this summer, coupled with the large, lucrative contracts of years past, these players aren't going to want to sit and wait out a lock-out for FUTURE years, when their payday is NOW!
Take Matt Barnes for instance. 2 year 10 million dollar deal. I believe that is his largest payday(or close to it) of his career/year. (Correct me if I'm wrong here). But why would a player like Barnes want to sit out a lock out just to watch his freshly signed contract only be honored at 50% of it's total value. He's not getting another contract like that. Same can be said for Joe Johnson, Amare Stoudemire, Gooden, Paul Pierce and a plethera of other players in the twilights of their careers. The younger players like Gay, Amir Johnson, etc will get addicted to their new found paychecks of over $100,000 bi-monthly. How will they cope when the well runs dry. Sure I understand this is a lot of money, but these young athletes are notorious for their riotous financial behaviors. Many will under-anticipate their needs and their financial liabilities and will soon be more motivated to strike a deal that gets their paychecks flowing back into their bank accounts and pronto.
You see, by giving out these contracts now, they're giving more players reasons to play the game, and the game will not be played on their terms, rather on the owners terms. The owners, not all, but most, are willing to take the hit NOW, in order to secure their financial solvency moving forward and secure their economic success. The difference between the individual and collective factions of 30 owners vs 400+ players is steeper than most realize. The owners are more easily united, have the ability and motivation to wait out the RIGHT deal for them and are looking to break the unions back this coming year.
So you see, there may actually be a method behind the madness we're witnessing this off-season, and while those contracts may be short-term nooses around certain franchises necks, the rope hanging these franchises up that are killing their ability to thrive financial is about to break. It's just a matter of patience for these owners. The owners are just increasing the incentive of the players into impatience which favors the owners.
(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I see no Darko in there
Because talent? You want to add a guy like boozer because hes talented? I’m sorry i just don’t see that as a valid reason. -- fffindeed
You bring up something I was curious about
Maybe someone here knows, if there is a lock out for a year would we lose 1 year of control of Tyreke or DMC? Does a 4 year NBA contract have a specific date range or is it for 4 seasons?
by BobTheAutomator on Jul 19, 2010 7:33 PM PDT reply actions
pretty sure we would lost that year
Because talent? You want to add a guy like boozer because hes talented? I’m sorry i just don’t see that as a valid reason. -- fffindeed
by wallywagon11 on Jul 19, 2010 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions
The Kings would likely lose that year.
But I think that would be hammered out under the new CBA.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
Handing out big contracts has been going on for more than one year.
The salary cap or the players share of Basketball revenue, is 51% of the total. Last year 28 teams were over the cap, and 11 of the top 15 team were in the Lux Tax which was $12M over the cap. Now, I won’t take the time to add it up , but it looks like the owners paid the players more than $360M over the agreed 51% of the BRI.
The bottom 15 teams overspent by $100M more, teams 6-14 spent over $100M more and the top 5 teams spent over $160M over the cap. This is nothing new. To stay in business every team is force to compete with the other 29 teams for a very limited work force. It’s not like 200 of the 400 players in the union are all stars and the other are solid players. If you are in business that requires highly skilled workers, you play top dollar for top employees. And, how many businesses in the world have to compete with 29 businesses for a work force that has less than 150 top quilified applicantes?
The players have never gotten the short straw from what I can see. Their share is based on the gross income. The owners bare all the expences from their 43%. And, the players always get more than what was agreed upon. The big markets and super rich owners keep throwing money at them trying to win a championship, and the teams without big money have to overspent (although not as severly) just to stay competetive.
The reality is that even if the owners got the union to agree to take 40% of the gross instead of 51%, the rich owners would overspent and the other owner would have to follow. And, in the end the players would get a lot more than 40%. Because if the owners can over pay by $360M now, they’ll probably pay $500M over the 40% just to put a winning team on the home court.
And, this isn’t just a owners issue. The players have to bear some of the burden, for keeping the league solvent.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
by HighTops on Jul 20, 2010 12:53 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
The NBA is solvent now.
That’s the point.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
I think you're probably right smills
It’s not all that complicated actually – Stern and the owners are going to get what they want, because the player’s union won’t be able to keep a significant number of the players onboard.
And Billy Hunter isn’t Marvin Miller, that’s for sure.
Maybe I'm dense...
But was your point that the owners are giving out crazy contracts this summer in order to tip the financial balance in favor of players ahead of bargaining the next CBA, in order to have the players owe the owners concessions, you know, over the liength of the new CBA, thereby saving the owners untold billions?
Nick Swisher is handsome.
Billions? Untold Billions?
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
I don't think he's counted on the fact that there isn't billions of dollars owed to players in the coming years.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by 


















