Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Judging the Kings' Schedule Using Win Probability

When the full 2010-11 NBA schedule was released earlier this week, it became clear the Kings would have a pretty accomodating slate early on but huge difficulty from mid-December on. (Sort of like 2009-10.)

But just how easy is the first part, and just how difficult does it get?

I used Bill James' log-5 prediction method, as adapted to NBA use by current Rockets analyst Ed Kupfer, to map out the weakest and toughest stretches of the Kings' '10-11 schedule. There are some inherent difficulties in doing this now, one of which being several teams changed dramatically this summer. For now, I've used last season's record as the variable for opponent strength; clearly, Cleveland won't be as good as they were last year, and Miami will be better. But season-to-season quality tends to hold pretty well in the NBA, so big picture this should look just about right. (Later, when Basketball Prospectus' new book comes out, I'll update using Kevin Pelton's team projections.)

As the key notes, the purple line represents the game-to-game win probabilities, based on opponent record and home court advantage. The red line is a moving 5-game average of the Kings' win probability. That helps us see trends in the schedule's difficulty. One more important note: I have assigned the Kings' ability (or winning percentage, in this case) as that of a 32-50 team. That's my official prediction as of August 13. Put it in the book, and ... well, you know.

Kingsprob1011_medium

After the jump, some interesting (to me) notes about what log-5 says right now.

Star-divide

* Based on my 32-50 prediction, log-5 has the Kings' best record at ... 8-7. At no point in log-5's projection do the Kings get more than one game over .500. Mind you, this system currently assumes Cleveland is a 60+-win team, which clearly isn't the case. If you adjust that downward below 42 wins, the Kings end up two games over .500 at 8-6.

* The last time the Kings are .500 is at 10-10, on Dec. 8.

* The log-5 system projects an 8-8 record in October and November, a 6-7 record in December, a 5-11 record in January, a 4-9 record in February, a 6-10 record in March and a 3-5 record in April. So the Kings would start 14-15 (.482) and then go 18-35 (.339) the rest of the way.

Now remember: this assumes a 32-50 record. You may think that's pessimistic. You may think that's optimistic. Just for kicks, if you think the Kings have the ability of a .500 team, the team peaks at 21-17 on Jan. 15 before coming back to Earth (where "back to Earth" is ".500 ball"). If you think the Kings have the ability of a 25-57 club (the team's record last season), then the team peaks at the gaudy record of 6-6. This tool isn't to be used to predict the Kings record -- that's an input, the prediction. This just shows you in action how the early schedule is quite easier than the January-February section.

Comment 25 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Feb-Mar is shaping up to be a killer

I hope that, like last year, the players don’t mail it in towards the end of the season and continue to play hard.

by clicc916 on Aug 13, 2010 1:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Wait

So you are saying Miami improved this off-season???

Well they did keep Haslem

by mbcarval on Aug 13, 2010 1:37 PM PDT reply actions  

How would this adjust

if we obtained Rudy Fernandez? (Ducks)

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Aug 13, 2010 2:31 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Hmm... So, I wonder.

If there is a net gain potentially for the Kings from the FA moves. Cleveland is clearly on the table. Toronto is easier. Then you have some of the other players moving. Probably a net sum of zero gain, but interesting. Might make us more able to pick up a couple more wins.

I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...

by MustangMBS on Aug 13, 2010 3:00 PM PDT reply actions  

I agree with your 32-50 record projection

In fact I wrote a FanPost about it back in May that came to the conclusion that we can reasonably expect, based on league history, to have a record of 31-51 or 32-50.

by jasonrp on Aug 13, 2010 3:01 PM PDT reply actions  

That's the most realistic - and therefore, we're screwed.

At that rate, we’re not going to make the playoffs at any point on ’Reek’s rookie contract. I don’t see him re-signing with us if that’s the case.

"Where hope goes to die"

by napg on Aug 13, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe not

I had another FanPost a year ago that showed, based on league history, that we should be back to winning in 2013-2014 which is the last year of Tyreke’s contract.

by jasonrp on Aug 13, 2010 3:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Looks like a Kings fan's EKG

By April, he or she will be dead.

The FairWeather Channel - Sports Comics and Bandwagon Forecast

by Hit4TheCycle on Aug 13, 2010 3:48 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Reke'd

If you want to be your best, you have to do your best, otherwise you are only second rate.
______________________
People Who Live In Glass Houses Should Not Throw Stones - English Idiom

by Slam_Dunk on Aug 14, 2010 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

32-50?

Blashpemy!

Drop the zero, then you are talking, since 32-5 will be our home record come next April.

That graph is meaningless lines of scribble IMO since the primary reasons the Kings tanked last year was because (1) Noccioni could not produce, and (2) JT went into major funk, after our strong start.

Noce is gone, and JT will have a much diminished role, so forget about last year. Over and done. And after half of a decade of wimpy play under the hoop, that will be ancient history, courtesy of DMC, Top Hat, and Sammy D.

One problem in your analysis is assuming carryover from one year to the next when team dynamic will be entirely new. I anticipate at least .500 ball or better, since with our defense and toughness commitment we should OWN our home court.

 I only wish we upgraded at SG.

by bench_blob on Aug 13, 2010 4:59 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Sound the trumpets, Raise the drawbridge, and drop the Oldsmobile

by Balky Needs on Aug 13, 2010 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cheers

I’m glad you and others are more optimstic. As I said, this isn’t a prediction, it’s a way of showing the schedule difficulty. If you think the team is going to go 32-50, 41-41 or 50-32, the difficulty of the schedule still undulates in the same way. The line just rises or falls based on the team’s quality.

by Tom Ziller on Aug 14, 2010 4:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I can only assume that you are using sarcasm.

If you want to be your best, you have to do your best, otherwise you are only second rate.
______________________
People Who Live In Glass Houses Should Not Throw Stones - English Idiom

by Slam_Dunk on Aug 14, 2010 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

great stuff

and beats out the stuffing out of the Ouija board.

Is this a similar model to the ESPN Accuscore? On game day the ESPN insider would run a predictor of each game outcome along with scores. I also wonder what model the sports books use in Las Vegas and how that compares. Science is always a bit more fun when there is cash involved.

by betweentheeyes on Aug 13, 2010 11:25 PM PDT reply actions  

I believe

Accuscore is similar, but not identical, to what log-5 gives you. Basketball-reference.com uses log-5 for gameday probabilities.

by Tom Ziller on Aug 14, 2010 4:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

The average 25-win team improves

Teams that won 23-27 games in one year in the past several years averaged 36 wins in the next. I plan to do a fanpost on this soon.

"I know we certainly gave up a lot to get him, but we do have other players on the perimeter who we can plug in. We haven’t had anybody who we feel is a go-to guy in the post. So we gave up a lot to get a lot, and we’re real excited about adding Carl." - Paul Westphal

by NewEraKings on Aug 14, 2010 10:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Im sorry

But barring injuries Kings are gonna win at least 35

Can't wait for October

by KingsFanInPortland on Aug 14, 2010 12:45 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

under 30 or little over still a budding season...

few up…
A journeyman T.E. if keeping his chops on by scoring off dribble will stay or roll towards a winning attitude…it’s in his nature. They will eventually roll dice next summer. I’m thinking one big name or two (min.) solid vet. players…we must all hope they get real lucky i.e. stay injury free.

by Poison Monkey on Aug 14, 2010 6:35 PM PDT reply actions  

The Kings future is promising

I’m not a King fans first, but I like to see them do well.
The Kings are in for some good teams ahead. Next season I see 30-35 wins. After that, as they gain experience and other Western teams get old (Spurs, Lakers, Suns, Mavs are all aging)
The Kings have a talented star in Tyreke Evans. Omri Caspi is developing into a good player, and the Kings frontcourt is going to be lethal with Landry, Dalembert, Whiteside and Cousins. They still have a lot of cap room and in the coming offseasons they’ll add some talented players through free agency, and/or have the room keep all their talent. This season they’ll be a respectable 30-35 wins. After that I see the Kings being continual playoff contenders. Experience and one or two more players is all thats keeping the Kings from being a league elite. I’m excited for the Kings to be a league powerhouse again

by ut2006 on Aug 14, 2010 8:16 PM PDT reply actions  

"sounds" pessimistic
Now remember: this assumes a 32-50 record. You may think that’s pessimistic. You may think that’s optimistic.

But the Kings are getting younger than last year, no? And they certainly look better, if even “only” 7 games better…

This smells, looks, and feels like a 50 win team in 2011-2012.

Nick Swisher is handsome.

by ChrisCEIT on Aug 16, 2010 9:43 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm saving my official predictions until I se a few pre-season games

But I’m guessing I’ll land somewhere around 35 wins.

So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii

by lietothegirls on Aug 16, 2010 4:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Kyle Lowry
Small
A Learning Experience on Loyalty For Sacramento Via Golden State
Lionel_small
#HereWeStay
Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration (UofL days)
Kings_sports_illustrated_small
Funny story
Small
As I sit here and watch the OKC Thunder come back against the Lakers
Waymantisdale-tz-150_small
the owners called down the thunder
Chief_petty_officer_small
Maturity in Sacramento Debacle
Small
Ryan Anderson to the Kings - Petrie's Gotta Give It A Thought
Chief_petty_officer_small
Open letter to the Maloofs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G