Cal Expo Rejects Land Swap; Kings Arena Plan Reels
In a surprising turn of events, Cal Expo has rejected the plan to move to the current site of ARCO Arena so that developers can turn the current Expo site into a new business/residential center and fund the construction of a new Kings arena downtown. The Cal Expo board received a negative report from a consultant recently, but the developers, city of Sacramento and NBA had asked for an extension so that they could provide an amended plan. Instead of granting the extension, the Expo board denied the plan in total, and will apparently look to sell off part of their land to fund much needed fairgrounds in the future. (Chris Webber voice: "Good luck.")
The Bee's Tony Bizjak reports developer Gerry Kamilos is already working on a back-up plan to potentially sell and develop the current ARCO site and land to help fund a downtown arena. (Chris Webber voice: "Good luck.") Bizjak reports the developers have a 30-day window to submit a new plan to the city, which is working with the NBA to figure this thing out. The NBA could also seek another plan on its own.
This is but the latest setback in a string of setbacks for the prospect of building a new Kings arena in Sacramento. Every setback, though, begets another idea, and even Kenny Thomas can tell you it's impossible to miss every single time you make a shot. One is bound to go in, even if by dumb luck.
(Right?)
UPDATE: The Maloofs have released a brief statement about the vote:
We must continue to work hard to find a solution. We look forward to hearing what are the next steps and options. Right now we are focused on our exciting upcoming season.
89 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We would like to offer you a dump truck full of cash and the chance to build state of the art facilities. What say you?
“Go fuck yourselves.”
Okay, let’s see what’s next.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen. And for a limited time, every third person who follows me on Twitter (andy_sims) gets a free ice cream cone.
Which I will eat.
by andy sims on Sep 24, 2010 2:42 PM PDT reply actions 10 recs
And you're surprised Cal Expo turned this down? Really?
They lack imagination. How so? Read: Believing horse racing makes Cal Expo enough money to offset the current arena plan. It seems like the Cal Expo board is insistent on making this work for the state of California forgetting that most of California doesn’t go to Cal Expo in the first place.
This board isn’t very forward thinking at the moment.
EvilCowtownInc: Screwin Suckaz over since 1985...... On Twitter
No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....
/sigh
"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!
by caseycheesecake on Sep 24, 2010 2:42 PM PDT reply actions
I will never buy tickets to a Cal Expo event again.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
by Aykis16 on Sep 24, 2010 2:44 PM PDT reply actions 3 recs
The place is a dump
I have not attended anything there is a couple of years. Just not worth it.
I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...
Ran through there as part of the Komen Race for the Cure course -
Yeah, the place is a dump.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
That is so crazy it might actually work...
Building an arena on a Native American reservation…next to a casino…
The casino part probably wouldn’t fly with the Maloofs…
You got 30 days Kamilos.....
Hopefully they can come up with something. Kevin Johnson, Kamilos seem really determined though to get a new arena built downtown. Something will get done folks, Sacramento needs to step up especially if KJ wants Sacramento to become a destination city!
I'm not sitting in your car, or your living room with a gun pointed to your head telling you to listen to 1140. - Grant Napear
I will never
attend ANY Cal Expo event again. Ever! Easyriders, concerts, State Fair, you name it. Not a single $ is going their way for the rest of my lifetime. A$$HOLES!
"We are NOT going to talk about me and Darko in the same sentence!" - Chris Webber to David "Dipshit" Khan
I'd like to join the Cal Expo staff...
In that alternate universe they’re in where the real estate market has leveled off enough to warrant turning away a guaranteed buyer offering well above market value. Seems like they have a steadier economy in Bizarro Sacramento. I bet they’d even have a newspaper job for me. And the State Fair is probably fun to boot!
Dip til I rip
by Muff209 on Sep 24, 2010 2:52 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 5 recs
Yes, exactly
This is what surprises me the most about the rejection. The Cal Expo’s assertion that they can get more value for their real esate on the open market in this economy is laughable. I am not surprised that the deal fel through, but i am blown away that it is because the Expo think they can get more bang for their buck by seling land during one of the most depressed real esate markets ever.
Wait....Why is everybody clapping? Everyone around me is clapping.... I guess I should be clapping too... GO LAKERS!!! I hate living in So Cal
by 27freethrows on Sep 25, 2010 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions
this whole opposition to a new arena is ridiculous
It’s like certain people got spoiled by the winning years and now don’t see them as a good investment. What happened to the days when we were just happy to have a professional sports franchise. While it may not be the main reason people are opposed to the arena, look at Seattle and how much they were hurt by the move of the sonics and they have two other teams to fall back on!!! WTF is wrong with people.!!! This may not sound very rational right now but I’m just pissed. I have faith though that something will get done even though it doesn’t seem like it right now. I’m done reading the comments in the Bee articles. Screw those people, yeah I said it…
KINGS PLAYOFFS 2012
The Sacramento Kings will win an NBA championship in my lifetime...it's going to happen.
I write for the site Pardon My Bias. Check out our website and my numerous posts on there at http://pardonmybias.com. You can also follow me on twitter.
http://twitter.com/amishd
http://twitter.com/pardonmybias
by longlivethekings916 on Sep 24, 2010 2:55 PM PDT reply actions
I would totally boycott Cal Expo
had I previously had any intention of ever going there in the first place.
I’ve been twice: Waterworld as a middle school kid on a class trip, and the State Fair, once, to see The Bangles on a reunion tour, because Susanna Hoff, man. Susanna Hoff.
Totally with you on Susanna Hoff back in the day
Also, I loved Waterworld, but the place was falling apart when I took my kids a few years ago. Not at all like when I was a kid.
A government agency, losing Millions every year, want to stay with the status quo, what a SHOCK
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
by HighTops on Sep 24, 2010 3:02 PM PDT reply actions 2 recs
Meant to add, sounds like someones trying to protect their 'gravy train', I mean jobs.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
I'm wondering that too, if the board just wasn't sure how the whole "private company takeover" thing was going to affect their own jobs.
"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie
by AnotherStupidSN on Sep 24, 2010 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
That's an oversimplification.
The rank and file could possibly have seen staff cuts, but a board membership is like an annuity, there’s almost nothing that can screw it up. Once you’re on the board, you’re on the board.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen. And for a limited time, every third person who follows me on Twitter (andy_sims) gets a free ice cream cone.
Which I will eat.
Maybe it's oversimplified now
but if a private company takes over the day to day operation for the next 30 years, how long will it take the next administration to realize that they would be justified in taking the majority of the Fair Commissions budget and feed it into their own pet pork belly project?
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
I don't follow. My understanding is that there are rules that generally prevent such things.
Especially where bread and circuses are concerned.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen. And for a limited time, every third person who follows me on Twitter (andy_sims) gets a free ice cream cone.
Which I will eat.
I would like to see the stated conflicts of interest among board members
Also, if the companies they own or work for have any contracts to run or support the CalEXPO site. That has been my biggest question.
Are any of the board members profiting indirectly from their position on the board because they would lose that in the current proposal. Somebody else will be running the fairgrounds.
I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...
Gil Albiani is a realtor/broker
I could see him being interested in being involved in the sale of land for the rennovation of Cal Expo. It seems like a major conflict of interest, but I’m not sure how these things work.
There are a couple of directors into real estate
Real estate works off commission. They get a flat percentage of the overall sale. Them selling a parcel for 50+ million amounts to a huge figure. Somebody is going to get 6% of that.
$3 million… If I was crooked enough to have plans to select a broker of my choice to enrich and maybe get some kind of kick back later I think I might have a problem losing that opportunity.
I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...
The things this is really about, most likely
Is not corrupt officials. Just power-hungry ones. They don’t want to give up control of the fairgrounds and would have to do that if somebody else leased and ran it.
I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...
The directors don't own the CalExpo real estate. There's no commission for them if it's sold.
And there’s no way that one of the companies any of them is involved with would be allowed to be a broker on the deal. That’s just hogwash.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen. And for a limited time, every third person who follows me on Twitter (andy_sims) gets a free ice cream cone.
Which I will eat.
You have to understand that I'm from Chicago, where payola is a way of life in politics
The truth is that the directors only receive compensation for reasonable expenses. What they do control is the budget, and the contracts that are entered into by the Expo Center. And, since 9 of the 11 directors are appointed by the govenor, we can reasonably assume that they have party affiliations. So, although there is no reason to believe there is any dishonesty involve, my political past makes me a skeptic.
If you look at the locations of the residences of the directors, and review the guidelines of the BOARD OF DIRECTOR’S POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL, you can see where they have no requirement to consider the wellfare of the City or County of Sacramento. There duties to the Expo center are strickly outlined. So, they have no responsibility to consider the property tax revenue and job implications of NOT helping the city advance with their plans for the downtown redevelopment.
And, this is where the problems of politics rears it’s ugly head. Even tho the deal would increase the property tax revenue for the city and benefit the people of Sacramento with more jobs and a revitalized downtown, it’s not part of the mandate assigned to the Expo Directors. The term ’It’s not may job’ comes to mind.
Since the Directors can’t be replaced for doing there duty, (I believe it’s a 4 year appointment) it would be up to the Legislature to redefine their priorities, and I can’t see that happening either. So for now, they can sit in their offices like Boss Hawgs and use their power to their advantage.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
by HighTops on Sep 24, 2010 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Fat bureaucrats
That want to keep thier petty power and keep feeding off the taxpayer till
So imitate the action of the tiger!.
Lend the eye a terrible aspect
- and teach them how to war!
Henry V iii
They have accepted losing millions.. They should all be fired.
I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...
Hey, Cal Expo Board! How about a group photo of you for the article?
Thank you.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Sep 24, 2010 3:19 PM PDT reply actions 7 recs
Shouldn't that be a cow's ass?
Too soon?
Dip til I rip
by Muff209 on Sep 24, 2010 3:30 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions

I agree, Slamson. I agree.
"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie
by AnotherStupidSN on Sep 24, 2010 3:20 PM PDT reply actions
Thank You : )
Nice pic…
I'm not sitting in your car, or your living room with a gun pointed to your head telling you to listen to 1140. - Grant Napear
I think the plan was doomed to failure from the beginning for one reason.
Cal Expo’s thinking “Why is Kamilos paying us so much now to get his hands on our land? What does he see in it? He probably is going to turn the land around and sell it for billions. Well, we’ll show him. We’ll keep on to our land and sell it for billions ourselves! Who’s the idiot now?”
This.
by elfboy_ on Sep 24, 2010 3:21 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
we'll learn them damn city boy's.
Show’em how real estate is supposed to be done.
Umm... I thought we were officially referring to Voison as the Chick Replacing Amick at the Paper? or CRAP, for short.
by sac_faithful on Sep 24, 2010 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions
I understand this turn of events is heartbreaking but,
In the long run having to deal with these guys would have been a frequent headache. What comes next I don’t know, but I am confident it gets done. If nothing else because the economy sucks everywhere not just sactown.
Umm... I thought we were officially referring to Voison as the Chick Replacing Amick at the Paper? or CRAP, for short.
So, a 1% Sales Tax would've gotten it done, but it had to go to the voters and it was voted down.
Then, this land swap would’ve worked out even better, but it had to be voted on by the Cal Expo Board, and it’s voted down. The issue here seems to be that we keep letting people vote on these things. Here’s the new plan: Mayor Johnson convinces Governor Schwarzenegger to declare a State of Emergency in Sacramento, due to the idiocy outbreak that’s crippling progress in the city. This gives the mayor the power to address the idiocy problem without having to go through the normal bureaucratic channels. Wham. Bam. The Kings open the 2014 season downtown in beautiful new Schwarzenegger Arena.
"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie
by AnotherStupidSN on Sep 24, 2010 3:33 PM PDT reply actions
To be fair, you'd need to make it statewide. No...
Nationwide.
Worldwide.
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen. And for a limited time, every third person who follows me on Twitter (andy_sims) gets a free ice cream cone.
Which I will eat.
Dont know why I even read the comments on SacBee
I honestly should have never even read the comments on SacBee.com. I honestly do not understand why some people are so against this. Do they want Sacramento to be like Lodi, Stockton, etc? While I enjoy the city of Sacramento, if they lose the Kings there will be even less stuff to do in Sacramento.
I lived in Reno for the last 6 years and enjoyed all the major events the city brought in. These events bring in millions upon millions of dollars for the city. I know Street Vibrations, which is currently going on, will bring in an estimated 33.1 million dollars. From what I have seen with Sacramento there is not as many events, and because of these they have to take advantage of everything they can do to bring money into the city. With a new arena and new business, I am willing to bet that the city would bring in millions and millions of dollars. Now if we lose the Kings, where is Sacramento going to bring in money?
you don't understand
If they build the downtown Arena that’s money would have gone to fix the schools, pay the cops, firemen and teachers’ unions, reverse furloughs, pave the streets, feed the homeless, heal the sick and generally make life better for the future. Why can’t you see that?
by betweentheeyes on Sep 24, 2010 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I'm just thankful that they won't be raising our taxes now that this wasteful boondoggle has been rejected.
"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie
by AnotherStupidSN on Sep 24, 2010 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I hope your real name is "Rod"
or your username is kind of creepy.
"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie
by AnotherStupidSN on Sep 24, 2010 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I hope you were being sarcastic....
because a new downtown arena is an investment in our future. Every person that would go to that arena would be bringing more money to the entire area, let me emphasis that THE ENTIRE AREA. Thats money that can be put toward paying cops, firemen, teachers, building roads, building schools.
Having a professional sports team has its perks too. That big ’ol arena does more than host basketball games. That means no more concerts, monster trucks and the like.
Sometimes I wonder how people can’t see that by now.
by westcoastoffense on Sep 24, 2010 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
hmmm, I hadn't thought of that
Thanks. That helps.
But my statement stands. You must be one of those selfish sports fans. Who cares about the Kings anyhow? They don’t even win.
What about the children?
by betweentheeyes on Sep 24, 2010 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Wont someone please think of the children!?
Umm... I thought we were officially referring to Voison as the Chick Replacing Amick at the Paper? or CRAP, for short.
by sac_faithful on Sep 24, 2010 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Talk about dysfunctional
Expo’s going down the crapper and the owners don’t want to give the site up. You would think it would make more business sense to build expo’s facilities in Natomas and use Arco’s facilities, but the owners are very, very stubborn.
Get facts straight
You have to pay attention to the story from start to finish. Right from the start it was reported by the Bee that Cal Expo is 100% self supporting and that their deficit for this year would come ouf of there own coffers and not the general fund and that legally no money from the general fund can go to Cal Expo. That is why Cal Expo got involved initially, because there is no money coming from taxpayers to fix up the facility.
What are they supposed to do? Somebody paid those consultants a lot of money for a feasability study and they came back the recommendation that “it wasn’t feasable”.
I’m a huge King’s fan but to think the City, State,NBA and two developers were ever going to make this work defies logic. I’m glad this is over so no more time needs to be wasted on something that wasn’t going to work in the first place. Now let’s move on to plan 44 or whichever one we are on now but hopefully something a little more realistic will be initiated.
I read that the consultant said they needed $200M to make the necessary repairs,
and that the land that they would sell to developers would bring in $64M. Leaving a $130M deficit and no practical way of making up the needed money. And, that the consultant made no recommendation as to how they could come up with the necessary money.
So, 20 years from now when the health department, rules that the Expo facility is unfit for use by the public, then the Expo Directors can sell off the rest of the property. But, unfortunately, the proceeds of the sale won’t be sufficent to purchase another site in a metropolitan area and build all the facilities to make it a suitable site for the State Fair.
The short sightedness of the Expo Directors is only exceeded by that of the legislature. And, those who feel that the city and county can prosper without growth. The kind of growth in jobs and tax revenue that a revitalized downtown and an upscale housing development in the Arden area would bring.
"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy
by HighTops on Sep 24, 2010 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions 8 recs
Last post may have sounded to negative
My last post may have sounded more negative than intended. LIke I said I am a huge Kings fan. Season ticket holder for 23 years. I would vote for a tax payer funded arena in a heartbeat because I think a quality big time arena would be great for our city or any city. I’d love to see some of my hard earned tax money going toward something I can get some use out of for a change instead of what it gets wasted on now.
I just want to see something presented that is realistic and actually has a chance of materializing.
This plan was very realistic until a small handful of people decided they didn't like it.
"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie
by AnotherStupidSN on Sep 24, 2010 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Good call.
"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie
by AnotherStupidSN on Sep 27, 2010 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions
There's no doubt
I don’t feel bad about this whole thing anyway because I feel that Kamilos will find another way to build the arena without Cal Expo being involved. Seeing that Sacramento isn’t built very well to begin with, this land swap would have made some things right as in putting a state of the art arena downtown and and moving the fair to a more spacious area rather than where it’s couped up in now. With a much more improved team coming in this season and the beyond we’ll be ready to rock the lights out in our new house!!!
There's no doubt
I don’t feel bad about this whole thing anyway because I feel that Kamilos will find another way to build the arena without Cal Expo being involved. Seeing that Sacramento isn’t built very well to begin with, this land swap would have made some things right as in putting a state of the art arena downtown and and moving the fair to a more spacious area rather than where it’s couped up in now. With a much more improved team coming in this season and the beyond we’ll be ready to rock the lights out in our new house!!!
IF the Kings move,
I’m moving with them, I swear.
"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!
by caseycheesecake on Sep 25, 2010 1:57 AM PDT reply actions
I dont get it
I know a lot of people in Sacramento don’t want the Kings to get a new facility. Don’t know if it’s just that they hate sports, or wanna be difficult, but whatever.
Going to Cal Expo is like going to a giant Walmart, I have to take a shower when I get home and de-lice.
Hard work beats talent when talent is hardly working...
Similarities and differences
Both pay minimum wage with no benefits, but at least at Walmart you get what you pay for.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
If Kings end up moving to Anaheim
We’ll have to watch those stupid Warriors. :(
This is what really pisses me off about the vote
Cal Expo board members voted 7-2 against the idea, saying the Natomas site is too small and not visible enough from the freeway.
Too small? We’ve been through this. Your own consultant suggested you sell-off 125 acres of your current land to fund reconstruction of the current fairgrounds, bringing the size of your current land close to the size you’d be dealing with in Natomas. Lose the racetrack and build a parking garage and you’re good. You’re going to have to downsize either way. Also, it is very possible to acquire other open land surrounding the Arco site. It’s not too small. IT’S NOT TOO SMALL.
Not visible enough from the freeway? Quick show of hands, who’s driven to Arco on I-5? Ever wonder what that big building is sitting in the middle of nowhere with absolutely nothing between it and the Interstate? THAT’S ARCO FUCKING ARENA! Also, has anyone ever been driving on Business 80 towards Arden and thought to themselves “Hmmm… I wish there was some place around here for me to pull off the freeway and spend my entertainment dollars… what a second, is that a ferris wheel I see out there on that shitty expanse of wasteland?!? Maybe there’s a State Fair going on! I hope you kids are hungry, because we’re about to have a fried food feast!”. Bullshit.
In conclusion, the Cal Expo board members that voted against this because the Natomas site is too small or not visible enough is either a dirty lying liar scumbag, or they’re complete morons and all of their former teachers and their parents should all be arrested and locked-up for failing so miserably in educating these barely-functioning dimwits and unleashing this destructive wave of idiocy on the world. Either way, they can kiss my ass.
"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie
by AnotherStupidSN on Sep 25, 2010 10:52 AM PDT reply actions 13 recs
I'm voting
dirty lying liar scumbag
Umm... I thought we were officially referring to Voison as the Chick Replacing Amick at the Paper? or CRAP, for short.
by sac_faithful on Sep 25, 2010 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions
note to self
don’t piss off ASSN. rec’d (or else!)
by betweentheeyes on Sep 25, 2010 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions
It's just the right size.
And it works great. What are we talking about again?
Rocks are free, and slingshots easily stolen. And for a limited time, every third person who follows me on Twitter (andy_sims) gets a free ice cream cone.
Which I will eat.
I want to flag this for making too much sense.
Author of the Pick and Scroll. Follow me on Twitter here.
The Cal Expo board just voted it down
Wait....Why is everybody clapping? Everyone around me is clapping.... I guess I should be clapping too... GO LAKERS!!! I hate living in So Cal
by 27freethrows on Sep 25, 2010 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions 5 recs
Yello! first-time poster on here.....
Being a Seattle native and subsequent Seattle sports fan (shudders) I am really pullin for you guys to get an arena built. What happened with the Sonics in my town was pretty much a big punch in the dick from the NBA and I now sympathize and root for any smaller market team (especially west-coast teams) with similar situations. Don’t expect anything to get done soon but don’t lose faith either. You’ve got my support!
7 picks for 7 quarterbacks in Draft 2011! EFF IT!
by Seatown_Sport_Head321 on Sep 25, 2010 12:27 PM PDT via mobile reply actions 8 recs
thanks man.....
Honestly if it weren’t for pure boredom and my love of college B-ball and watching ex-Huskies (hence why I started watching and paying attention to you guys) I would’ve stopped watching the pros a long time ago. Most NBA “fans” are probably wearing Lebron James Heat jerseys or betting which year Kobe gets his second ring on his thumb.
7 picks for 7 quarterbacks in Draft 2011! EFF IT!
by Seatown_Sport_Head321 on Sep 25, 2010 12:57 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Speaking as a critic of the Convergence plan...
…I must share in some agreement with ASSN’s post above. Anyone who thinks that the current visibility of Cal Expo from the freeway is better in comparison to the Arco Park complex is either a) blind; b) a moron; or c) a Los Angeleno.
With that said, the 7-2 vote of the Cal Expo board is a bit of a message to the folks behind the Convergence, that being (I believe) that they felt like they were being taken along for a ride in this whole circus, and I believe they felt that their views and their priorities in this whole situation were, at best, a tertiary concern (behind those of the Maloofs and the Kamilos group).
The Board could have delayed, or waited the extra 30 days to see what Kamilos came up with, but instead basically said “logic be damned, GTFO.”
And so, the Convergence is pretty much deader than dogshit, but not in a manner that will satisfy anyone, because I believe the Convergence has not gotten its full hearing by the Cal Expo board.
Folks, if the Kings are to remain in town, in all likelihood the only way for that to happen is either with a) Arco 3.0 on the baseball stadium site, or b) Arco 2.1 on the existing building footprint with the team playing for one season down in Stockton while the rebuild happens.
That also means that the Maloofs are probably going to have to shoulder a much larger chunk of the payment for that to happen.
Those who walk on eggshells rarely leave footprints.
Some here are missing the obvious
This is simple. There was over a million dollars spent on study that recommended to the Cal Expo board not to pursue the convergence plan. Case closed. That’s it. Their board is NOT going to go against that. Use some common sense peeps.
If the Kamilos group didn’t put the best offer on the table to be studied, shame on them. They blew it.
I spent 5 hours of my life reading the Cal Expo report. Their #‘s weren’t even close to what the Kamilos group put out. NOT EVEN CLOSE. IT WAS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN FOLKS, so let’s get busy and get something going that has a chance at working.
But did you read the Kamilos revised proposal?
He completely revamped his original proposal and the consultant did not review that plan that I know of or have heard.
Also, if it is true that this study cost a millions dollars that blows me away. No wonder these morons are losing 15 million a year. How many other phat contracts have they handed out? I think the question needs to be asked.
I think the legislature needs to get involved and sell Cal Expo to Kamilos. The Governor wanted to sell off the property. Let that Board of Directors think about losing those cushy jobs completely. See how fast the idiots come around.
I didn't major in Common F-cking Sense, but ...
Kamilos group blew it when
they didn’t factor in bribe money into their proposal.
Graft. It doesn’t just mean hard work.
This.
by elfboy_ on Sep 25, 2010 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Well
at least we still have the River Cats and Moutain Lions… There’s some top notch sports entertainment right there.
I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars... and you. What else you need to know?
by NoCal-SteelCity on Sep 27, 2010 10:48 AM PDT reply actions

by 














