24Q: Will the Kings Use Their Amnesty Clause?
Today a rumor came out that the Kings would use their Amnesty Clause on Francisco Garcia if they signed Jamal Crawford, in order to make room. This didn't make sense on a few levels (neither does signing Jamal Crawford, but that's just me), and Jason Jones recently confirmed my suspicions by tweeting that the Kings had no plans to amnesty Garcia, and I for one, trust the Sacramento Kings beat writer over a reporter in Portland.
But will the Kings ever choose to use their amnesty clause? We know the amnesty clause can only be used on players and contracts in place as of July 1st, 2011 and can be used prior to any season through the length of the CBA. For the Kings, the only two guys that stand out as possible amnesty candidates are Francisco Garcia (3 years, $18.3 million) and John Salmons (4 years, $31.2 million). Both of those deals are essentially for one year less than that, since Garcia has a team option and Salmons' last year is only $1,000,000 guaranteed.
Of the two, Salmons is the better player, but seems to me to be the likelier amnesty candidate due to his larger contract and age. But remember, using the amnesty clause means you still have to pay the player, the contract just comes off the salary cap. I don't think the Maloofs would want to pay a player $8,000,000 + for a couple years for a player to not play for them (although they did with Kenny Thomas *Rimshot*), unless they really needed to clear room to sign a player of a much higher caliber.
So I don't see the Kings using the amnesty clause, not unless something comes along that is much better, or Salmons or Garcia suffer career-ending injuries or seriously regress. That's just my opinion. What's yours?
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ziller is on fire!!!
teamziller Tom Ziller
Man, don’t you all think Portland is just beautiful this time of year and every other time of year? @JCrossover
teamziller Tom Ziller
Pretty sure the Kings are going 0-66 this season. @JCrossover
I would join the bandwagon but JCrossover is not accepting my tweets. :)
"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.
you guys are ridiculous
you’ll be mad if a team like the Blazers, or God forbid, the Lakers were to add him to their team.
Personally, I think he should go to the Blazers and have a chance to average 20+ points a game for a playoff team. If he came to the kings, I think he would be similar to Gortat on the Magic. Gortat is the man, but it wastes his talents if he is stuck behind Howard.
The Blazers have a huge hole to fill with Roy retiring and Crawford should thrive there.
by SharkKings49 on Dec 14, 2011 3:14 PM PST up reply actions
I agree
I think Crawford fits in very well with the blazers.
by wildcard530 on Dec 14, 2011 3:19 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Yea, I agree that he's a good fit with Portland
But I think Kings are gonna be better. Portland always has the injury problem. Now Roy is done, Oden is missing another year, & Aldridge just had a heart procedure. I’d rather go to the team that has no injury problems and has incredible depth. This is going to be a winning team this year, especially if he joins it. Portland would be a good situation, but I don’t see them being better than the Kings. He gets more money to come to a better team.
I think the Kings only take amnesty if they sign both Kirilenko and Crawford
And if it comes down to dollars, it would be Salmons, as Garcia’s deal is really only guaranteed for two years at $12m and change. But if it’s a function of pulling the amnesty trigger to make contracts fit, I suppose it could come down to Garcia.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Voted yes, on Salmons
Mostly wishful thinking. Sorry, John.
In most polarizing arguments, the truth is found somewhere in the middle.
Follow me on Twitter
Author of Inside-Out Game
Salmons is better than Garcia
As long as his shot selection is good, he’s very good to have on the court for both ends of the floor
Garcia is on a smaller deal
And is a leader in the locker room. I’d rather keep him. Specifically, I hope we acquire a small forward who makes Salmons expendable.
In most polarizing arguments, the truth is found somewhere in the middle.
Follow me on Twitter
Author of Inside-Out Game
Salmons is better than Garcia
But his contract is worse: 3 yrs. @ $24m vs. 2 yrs. @ $12m.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Who cares
Salmons is better and makes this team better than Garcia. The difference between their contracts is 1 extra year and only $2mil more per season. That’s fine on a team with so much cap room. Salmons is a good player and any team would take him over Garcia any day of the week.
by Ninja King on Dec 14, 2011 4:28 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Well, my bet is that the Malindas care about an extra $12m
That extra year for Salmons coincides with Evans’ qualifying offer year, so that money could be a pretty big deal. And if the notion is that you have relegated both of these guys further down the bench as a result of signing Crawford and Kirilenko, it makes no sense to tie up that future money for no reason.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Comparing these two makes no sense
Beno was a very effective (54% adjusted FG%) two point shooter that occasionally ventured out to three point range. Crawford is a less effective (49% adjusted) shooter who fires a lot more from 3. Neither player gets props for defense.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
Also,
Beno had a 47% assist to shot taken percentage, compared to 27% for Crawford.
Apples and oranges.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
You mean we can't lump all poor defenders in to one category and make parallel comparisons about their overall quality as a basketball player based solely on their poor defense?
A brief comparison between Mormonism and Historic Christianity
http://carm.org/comparison-between-christian-doctrine-and-mormon-doctrine
A former atheist's (me) appeal: Creation Science
http://creation.com/creation-answers
by sac_faithful on Dec 14, 2011 3:44 PM PST up reply actions
Crawford isn't a bad defender. Limited his opponents to 36% shooting in the playoffs last season. Those 2 team he played against were the Magic & Bulls
Beno on the other hand is complete trash on defense
You're really bad at this - no offense
"I DECLARE BANKRUPTCY!" - Michael Scott
by otis29 on Dec 14, 2011 4:35 PM PST up reply actions 5 recs
Otis, you are so right
he takes tons of shots, misses most, shoots again. Low efficiency poster
Frances Amthor: I think you're a very stupid person. You look stupid, you're in a stupid business, and you're on a stupid case.
Philip Marlowe: I get it. I'm stupid Farewell My Lovely (1975)
And in this vein I get what I want how I want it because I am the customer. You might want to remember that you thieving scumbag mongrel bitches.
nate21h@evilcowtowninc.com
Beno rhymes with Drain-o. Understand now?
by Gabraham on Dec 14, 2011 3:02 PM PST up reply actions 5 recs
It makes perfect sense
Beno was efficient while Crawford was not. Beno couldn’t play defense but at least he did something. Crawford adds nothing but high volume shooting.
The whole point of this country is if you want to eat garbage, balloon up to 600 pounds and die of a heart attack at 43, you can! You are free to do so. To me, that's beautiful.---Ron Swanson
i put Garcia
but i dont really see them using it as things look now but if they do i think it would def be garcia. most overpaid player on our team. (i think everyone can agree with that)
Garcia if either
Don’t see them getting a stud SF any time soon. Salmons is an updgrade over Garcia. Personally think neither of those two though.
I voted yes on Salmons
but not this year or probably next.
"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."
- Chessmaster Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower
We don't have any albatross contracts
Necessity will determine if anyone gets amnestied. We would have to get an upgrade at SF and need the cap room to boot for anything to happen. As long as we are below the luxury tax everyone is staying on the team.
Furthermore, we need the depth. This will be an interesting year for mid level players because I foresee them getting a bit more playing time this year in order to give starters proper rest. It will also bump up role players stats for free agency next year so buyers beware.
A brief comparison between Mormonism and Historic Christianity
http://carm.org/comparison-between-christian-doctrine-and-mormon-doctrine
A former atheist's (me) appeal: Creation Science
http://creation.com/creation-answers
only crazy thing I can think of
would be Wilson Chandler as a free agent next offseason and we need to clear some room.
by wallywagon11 on Dec 14, 2011 3:54 PM PST up reply actions
I don't think the Kings will use amnesty on John
not just because I like him, but because of what I read on Cowbell Kingdom "Coach Paul Westphal on who is having the best camp so far: "I would say that Marcus Thornton had a terrific scrimmage last night and John Salmons has been excellent all the time. I think our rookies are adjusting really well and looking comfortable. I would say probably the two guys on top of their games or close to mid-season form as they can be are John (Salmons) and Marcus (Thornton)."
I'm no Salmons hater - but he is still our top amnesty candidate
He is a big upgrade at SF and consistent, and a good guy. And, the coach likes him. (Maybe too much… but that might be a coaching problem, right?)
But the Kings will use the amnesty clause on Salmons in two scenarios:
1) Andrei Kirilenko if he came would obviously start, and with other options (including a three-guard lineup with big guards like Tyreke and perhaps Crawford) you can see us doing both the financially reasonable thing, and the classy thing to let a player of Salmons’ quality and age find some minutes elsewhere.
2) In 2012 – remember the amnesty clause can be pulled out next season, and it is expected to be a significant free agent year.
I don’t see Franciso’s contract as terribly bad, nor as enough to blow the amnesty clause on. Bench depth matters, and he comes off the books around the time we need to re-up with young potential stars. And, he is a glue guy on the court, the locker room, the community and ownership values him for all of the above. I see Franciso with us for many years.
I voted for Salmons
It probably won’t be this year, but there are a lot of attractive FA’s next year and he is the highest paid guy on our team. Salmons is a better all around player, but Garcia seems to be more of a glue guy. I just wish his defense was as good as Salmons, because Garcia fits perfectly on offense by standing on the 3pt line and stroking 3’s.
Regarding Kings using amnesty
Having not read comments yet here’s a few thoughts. Wouldn’t surprise me if they used the amnesty. The Maloof’s are gamblers and the Kings are all they have left. They’ll go all in to the best of their ability financially. Time to bring the excitement back to the arena. I like how they are loading up the roster instead of just 1 big signing. That’s a good strategy in this shortened year. Also gives them a lot of flexibility to trade in future. That’s where there is probably a better opportunity than in this free agent class. Like the moves they’ve made and that they look like they can and will run. Won’t be much time for this team to develop into an effective half court offensive team.
by kurtis22 on Dec 14, 2011 5:55 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Voted Garcia
Just due to his contract. If next year the option comes along to trade for a legit starter making good money, I can see the team cutting Garcia in the last year of his contract to stay closer to the cap.
I don’t see them cutting Salmons for two reasons. First, he’d still get paid and I don’t see the Kings paying him to not play for them. Second, and whether people like it or not, coaching staff and front office REALLY like John Salmons. Tough to get over, I know… but it’s the obvious truth. Unless his production on the court really is terrible, this won’t change.
"Children want what they want when they want it." ... Andy Sims
Didn't I read somewhere that part of the new CBA allows teams to restructure a player's contract like in the NFL?
I wonder if Garcia would be a candidate for something like this as opposed to a straight amnesty. The team obviously values Garcia for a number of reasons, but probably not to the full extent of his paycheck. He’s a bit overpaid, but at this point there are only a couple of years left on his deal and really not a significant amount of money. I could see a lot of teams interested in grabbing him off of the waiver wire, but at a very low bid. Similarly, I could see a lot of teams, including the Kings, very interested in adding/keeping Garcia on their team after his current contract is up, though at a much lower salary.
I’m not totally sure how a contract restructuring would work or all of the pros/cons for Garcia and the team, but there’s something about Garcia’s value now and moving forward in his career that makes me feel like he might be content to take a pay cut now for a longer, lower contract. It would essentially be Cisco recognizing the fact that he’s probably never going to have a chance to earn another big contract on the Kings or on any team, and the value of most of his remaining career is pretty well set (and it’s set well below his current annual pay).
"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie
by AnotherStupidSN on Dec 15, 2011 8:30 AM PST reply actions
Jamal Crawford
I too am puzzled by the Kings interest in Jamal Crawford. While understanding he is a proven offensive weapon, it seems like our interest would have ended when we re-signed Thorton. The only thing I can think of is that the move would be part of another move the team is trying to make for an upgrade at the 3 or 5 spot.
I still wouldn’t mind seeing Sammy D. protecting the rim and allowing DeMarcus to play the 4 on occasion.
I am also a bit suprised that Westphal has named Hayes the starting 4 so soon. Would it not be better to have it be earned in camp. Hickson and Thompson should be given the chance to compete for that spot. Again, I am glad to have Hayes, but we have more and that decision made so early sends a message to both of those guys that is not positive.
Looking forward to seeing all of them in action soon. Go Kings!!

by 

















