Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Chuck Hayes Is Not Kenny Thomas, And Other Facts

ESPN's Marc Stein has reported that the Sacramento Kings have offered Chuck Hayes a four-year, $20 million contract, and are optimistic that the free agent will take it once transactions are cleared for take-off on Friday. SI.com's Sam Amick has confirmed the report.

The initial opinions on Hayes have been all over the place -- from disappointment at the lack of a big splash to satisfication with a top defender in the frontcourt to a good number of height jokes. (Someone is going to make Tyreke Evans and Hayes stand back to back at some point, aren't they?)

Amid all of the fair points, though, there is some misunderstanding of Hayes, I feel. So let's talk about those things and some other things. The single most important thing about Chuck Hayes to know is that Chuck Hayes is not Kenny Thomas.

Star-divide

1. Chuck Hayes is not Kenny Thomas. I really need y'all to understand this: Chuck Hayes is not Kenny Thomas. When Kenny Thomas arrived in 2005, he had five years and $40 million remaining on his contract, or an average salary of $8 million per season. Under the deal as reported, Hayes will have an average salary of $5 million for a shorter term. Keep in mind that the salary cap has risen. In 2005-06, K-9's first full season in Sacramento, his $6.5 million contract represented 13 percent of the Kings' salary cap. A $5 million year for Hayes now represents 8.6 percent. Further, K-9's deal ran through a phase of the Kings' history where the team needed to drop salary and rebuild. The Kings cannot really drop salary at this point, and it's going to take a lot of bad contracts to make Hayes' contract a killer that hurts the Kings' ability to rebuild (again, within the next four years). If the Kings need to drop salary and rebuild within four years, something has gone terribly, terribly wrong.

2. Chuck Hayes is not going to make life more difficult for DeMarcus Cousins, the most important Kings' big man. There has been some concern as to what Hayes' presence could mean for Jason Thompson and J.J. Hickson. It feels like a ridiculously solid bet that Hayes will be the opening day starter, based on what we know about Paul Westphal and veterans. (I turn your attention to Desmond Mason and Antoine Wright.) So yes, that doesn't help Hickson or Thompson as the approach free agency. I love Thompson; I think he's a player worth keeping and I hope he sticks in Sacramento for the team's rise. But the Kings' fortune will not be determined on how many minutes Jason Thompson gets. The same applies to Hickson: he's a neat piece, but he's not the make-or-break player in the frontcount. That's DeMarcus Cousins. And Cousins will, in theory, get a whole lot of help from Hayes. Chuckwagon has proven he can defend both frontcourt positions, which will help Cousins (in theory, it's always theory with DMC) stay out of foul trouble and hide some defensive weaknesses he has. On the other end, Hayes will help hit the offensive glass hard; Cousins underperformed there due to setting up shop further from the rim, and will move the ball. He's not going to be taking shots away from Cousins or Tyreke Evans. That's no small matter. Even in Hayes' most shot-happy season last year, he took two fewer FGAs per 36 minutes than Samuel Dalembert, and he's obviously a much better passer and ball-protector.

3. Chuck Hayes will be the best frontcourt defender the Kings have had in years. Dalembert added an interior defensive presence that the Kings had long been looking for, something we hadn't seen since Scot Pollard, really. Hayes won't be blocking shots at the rim, which means that our guards have to do a better job keeping their man in front of them. But on the ball, he's better than Dalembert. As more big men step out to 18 feet and begin creating their own offense -- LaMarcus Aldridge, Dirk, Kevin Love, Amar'e Stoudemire, Pau, Zach Randolph and the golden child himself Blake Griffin -- those on-ball skills are going to be incredibly important. Think about it: if you keep Dalembert and run with that four big rotation (Sam, DMC, JT, J.J.), who do you put on Griffin? Sam's not stopping Blake or players like him. Hayes might. When you look at how many clubs (especially in the West) have skilled, high-offense power forwards, the usefulness of a defender like Hayes is readily apparent.

4. We're going to find out if Tyreke, DeMarcus and Jimmer Fredette can carry the team's offense. Hayes is a limited offensive player ... which means that Evans, Jimmer and Cousins will be required to bear the heavy load on that end ... which means we;re going to find out if this crazy experiment Geoff Petrie has cooked up will work. (That's one of my bigger problems with the John Salmons trade: in addition to playing unattractive basketball, he's going to take the ball out of Evans' and Cousins' hands. That might be good for the team's immediate efficiency needs, but long-term, it's Tyreke's and DeMarcus' team, right?) A high-touch big man wouldn't exactly have stunted the growth of the Tyreke-DeMarcus-Jimmer triumvirate, but we wouldn't have as clean a look at the potential of the group.

5. Chuck Hayes is a fan favorite. If we're not going to be a championship-caliber club for a few (few?) more years, why not love our guys?

Comment 235 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks TZ.

You have helped me climb off the ledge a bit.

by Sincere P. on Dec 8, 2011 6:47 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Shane Battier just tweeted...

He is taking his wrinkled head to South Beach…

by Ryan J on Dec 8, 2011 6:55 AM PST reply actions  

liiiiinkkkkk

GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
iashwash, you are the voice of reason - Holmdel

by iashwash on Dec 8, 2011 6:57 AM PST up reply actions  

laaaazy

he said, “shane battier just tweeted…” MAYBE CHECK TWITTER!

huh? wha?

by effin steve on Dec 8, 2011 7:16 AM PST up reply actions  

You've got to be kidding me?

Great signing by the Heat and this puts a lit of pressure on the orher powerhouses to sign more talent. Let the bidding wars begin, new CBA what?!?

"If the 49ers success offends you, so be it." Jim Harbaugh

by Mityt on Dec 8, 2011 7:59 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

everytime I search on twitter for someone famous

I get a million fake posters.

I don’t have the patience, let alone the comprehension to figure out the @weird_lexical #thatIStwitter in ordr to fgr out why I only hav 140 crctrs.

GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
iashwash, you are the voice of reason - Holmdel

by iashwash on Dec 8, 2011 9:09 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I feel ya

I don’t read anything on twitter either. I will wait for the unabridged English version to appear 10 minutes later on ESPN.com

by OrangeLazarus on Dec 9, 2011 9:20 AM PST up reply actions  

I like this signing...

if it is indeed true, and goes through.

My old account was lars.ON but I change it to match my Twitter handle.

Follow me on Twitter

by kwlarson on Dec 8, 2011 7:07 AM PST reply actions  

This is a great sign for the Kings!

Hayes will bring a defensive presence we haven’t had in years and he’ll be a great leader and mentor for Cousins, Hickson, etc… Hopefully they’ll feed off his intensity and understand more on how to bring it every night

Great sign Petrie!

by Screamer on Dec 8, 2011 7:23 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

Don't like

This team lacks shot blocking with their current bigs and adding another big that dosen’t challenge guys at the rim concerns me

by prostacker on Dec 8, 2011 7:37 AM PST reply actions  

Shot blocking is overrated- Much rather have a better rebounder/assister in a big man- And a guy who can play man defense

Founder of team Omté Caspeen

by Widowwolf on Dec 8, 2011 8:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Jerry talks about this all the time.

Blocked shots rarely lead to a turnover, and is some cases lead to an easier shot than the original attempt. I’d be curious to see how often the ball ends up out of bounds, giving the offense a chance to reset. It’s gotta be a good percentage. I’d take a guy with quick hands that can rack up the steals over a shot blocker who’s sole focus is to send the ball flying out of bounds.

by Crocoduck on Dec 8, 2011 8:32 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

That's one thing Dwight needs to work on.

He loves to block it into the stands when he could easily just grab it sometimes and throw an outlet pass.

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Dec 8, 2011 8:36 AM PST up reply actions  

Absolutely.

I think it was Bill Simmons that said if Dwight Howard had Bill Russel’s basketball IQ, you might as well fold up the league.

by Crocoduck on Dec 8, 2011 8:48 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

As a bit of an aside

I don’t watch Dwight Howard all that much but I almost feel like the potrayal of him as some offensively challenged dumb but increadibly athletic player is way over the top. Guy takes some really smart angles, rotates really good, and doesn’t seem as bad in the post on offense as people make it out to be.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 9:01 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah

he’s good offensively, and making great strides.

But there’s a big difference between good and Bill Russel :)

GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
iashwash, you are the voice of reason - Holmdel

by iashwash on Dec 8, 2011 9:13 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Yeah, he's the best actual defender in the league as well as shotblocker

Look at the other guys on the Magic roster the last couple years. That team has been one of the league’s best on defense, mostly because of Dwight Howard, everyone just funnels them in to him, or the other team doesn’t go inside as much and opts for jumpers because they’re afraid of him.

Author of NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Dec 8, 2011 9:13 AM PST up reply actions  

I've heard those same things from the talking heads.

I wouldn’t call him dumb by any means, but I think it’s fair to say he’s a bit goofy and often chooses to make the more spectacular play than the smart one. But I’d agree with you, he’s not the best defensive player in the world from being a dumb super athlete.

by Crocoduck on Dec 8, 2011 9:28 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

The intimidation factor of a big block isn't for nothing, though.

If you drive into the lane against Howard and put up a shot that gets spiked off the media table, aren’t you going to be a little sheepish about trying it again during the rest of the game?

"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie

by AnotherStupidSN on Dec 8, 2011 11:13 AM PST up reply actions  

No. And while you're at it, drain a 3 during the ensuing possession.

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Dec 8, 2011 11:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Maybe.

But I’ll still challenge him if I think I can get him in foul trouble.

"He forced it to go in the net, and that's a good thing." -Jerry Reynolds

"He's gonna get a big hug, and I'm gonna hang on for a while." -Duane Kuiper

by Juan Primo on Dec 8, 2011 11:37 AM PST up reply actions  

Whenever things like this happen, it always reminds me of this

by CloudyEyes on Dec 8, 2011 11:23 AM PST up reply actions  

It's not that I don't like this signing...

Hayes is a pretty solid rotation player. But with so much cap space I had bigger hopes for the Kings.

by Mad Hops on Dec 8, 2011 7:46 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

well

who knows if Petrie didn’t put out offers for the big guns and they declined ….. you really wanna spend 15 mil a year on Chandler? I don’t. I mean, the arena situation isn’t resolved yet (although I think it will be.) That might not sit well with the bigger names.

If we all wants the big names to come here …. there’s one big thing they can do to change that …. start winning. I think that happens here soon.

by Dub_TC on Dec 8, 2011 7:50 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree that winning changes things.

But I personally would have wanted the Kings to pay $15MM for Chandler. I believe that the Kings are a high quality center and a high quality small forward away from really competing and being able to go deep into the playoffs (assuming Cousins is a PF). Chandler is a proven NBA champion caliber center. There’s no reason to continue to hold on to this cap space. The future is now. A lot hinges on this year! If they go out and lay an egg in there first 20 games (say 4-16), the mementum for the arena would really be hindered.

by Mad Hops on Dec 8, 2011 8:48 AM PST up reply actions  

Had?

Free agency isn’t over. Technically it hasn’t even started.

by jveezy on Dec 8, 2011 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Judging by the posts here,

it has for us.

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Dec 8, 2011 12:41 PM PST up reply actions  

I like it, too

I don’t care that he’s 6’6" …. dude fills up the defensive stats. That’s EXACTLY what this team has needed for a while. We’re not depending on him to come in and score 15 a night. Dude gets over a steal a game, gets boards, passes the ball well …… I like it. Plus, at 5 mil a season …. it’s not a horrible contract that we’ll regret.

As much as I wanna see them go get a Nene or Gasol …. I’ll take this one. I’d much rather have them spend 5 mil on Hayes instead of spending 10 mil for Dalembert.

by Dub_TC on Dec 8, 2011 7:48 AM PST reply actions  

good points

I see what your saying and I don’t have anything against Hayes, he could be really solid.

I guess I was hoping for a bigger splash.but who knows what will go down tomorrow

Sometimes you just have to look yourself in the mirror and say....Tyreke Evans.
That just happened.

by darkadun on Dec 8, 2011 7:56 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

wait

Are you the artist formerly known as what the crap?

GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
iashwash, you are the voice of reason - Holmdel

by iashwash on Dec 8, 2011 9:14 AM PST up reply actions  

crap

"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."
- Chessmaster Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower

by lietothegirls on Dec 8, 2011 9:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Ka-ka

Purveyor of Bull Plop

by SayWhat? on Dec 8, 2011 11:41 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Doo-doo

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Dec 8, 2011 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm not hating on him, I'm just curious

If he’s only 6-6 how can he be such a good defensive player? I mean won’t other big men be able to just shoot over him?

by FTFeli on Dec 8, 2011 7:55 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

That's about Ron-Ron's size

Ask him. The Chuckwagon, like Artest, is about as wide as all outside. He has long arms and is as strong as an ox. He won’t block shots but 7 feet doesn’t help you when you can’t get within 10’ of the basket. Of course the guards cannot allow deep penetration or it wouldn’t matter if Bill Russell was manning the paint.

"If the 49ers success offends you, so be it." Jim Harbaugh

by Mityt on Dec 8, 2011 8:04 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Ron Ron doesn’t play center in the league and doesn’t defend 7 footers

Founder of team Omté Caspeen

by Widowwolf on Dec 8, 2011 8:08 AM PST up reply actions  

But Hayes does and he does

I was responding to the question if how a 6’6 player can be a good defender.

That being said, Ron could guard some centers. Not many, but some. Hayes also is a PF. He was forced to play center as Houston has nobody else. He can play center, but I expect him to play the 4 for Sac and be the backup C if necessary.

"If the 49ers success offends you, so be it." Jim Harbaugh

by Mityt on Dec 8, 2011 8:24 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

This is actually one of the things I like about this.

I’m more positive about Hayes than I am about what this means long term if that makes sense.

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 8, 2011 8:33 AM PST up reply actions  

Ron Ron was always billed

As a guy that defended four positions. Well we just bulked up Ronnie some and made him guard two positions.

It’s not a big conceptual leap that a 6’6" guy can play great defense at the 5 spot. I have no idea why people are getting so hung up about. Especially when you take into consideration how pretty much every NBA player has their height exaggerated.

GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
iashwash, you are the voice of reason - Holmdel

by iashwash on Dec 8, 2011 9:18 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

so what you're saying is...

Hayes is really only like 6’

..."You've got Burkle?"

by kingsforaday on Dec 8, 2011 9:51 AM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

not to mention

the C position is shrinking in the league as teams opt for putting a 4 man out there instead.

Currently satiating my hunger for Kings basketball with a renewed focus on the NINERS

by Tetsu on Dec 8, 2011 10:52 AM PST up reply actions  

He's a pain in the ass.

Yes they can shoot over him, but the intent is that they are doing so in an off-balance, fade-away, under duress, low-percentage type manner.

Getting around him can be quite difficult (take a look at the youtube links people posted on the last thread) as he has very quick lateral movement and difficult for the offensive player to move around in the low post.

by Gabraham on Dec 8, 2011 8:04 AM PST up reply actions  

Curiosity quenched.

He makes it so when they do post up they are out of position to take a comfortable shot, using his lower body strength, Ben Wallace was only 6-8 – 6-9 couple inches mean nothing when you have long arms.

by Ultrakingsfan on Dec 8, 2011 8:05 AM PST up reply actions  

Dejuan Blair

Seems to have a similar body type to Chuck. Short, stout, really long arms.

by unfair weather on Dec 8, 2011 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Really long arms

As I recall his wingspan is 7+ feet.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 8:07 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm hesitant to try to post it from my phone

But in the yesterday’s fanshot someone posted a video of Chuck Hayes playing defense against the likes of Dirk and Blake Griffin and he was absolutely beastly. He appears to be tremendously strong (Griffin was just bouncing backwards off of him) and has a great sense of where to position himself. Couple that with active feet and gorilla arms and you’ve really got something.

Honestly, I really like this and hope he signs. I’ve got a soft-spot for hard workers who maximize their talents and glue guys, and I think he’s both. Looking forward to what he can contribute to the Kings.

by lead_pipe on Dec 8, 2011 8:30 AM PST via mobile up reply actions   2 recs

Seems like the type of guy that would frustrate Dirk

I like Hayes. I just don’t like the type of moves you would make to help a veteran team or an establishes up and coming team on a team that won 25 games the last 3 years

by Allbenji on Dec 8, 2011 8:26 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

If this is the MLE he's accepting, will this count towards the Kings' salary cap?

I think I read Larry Coon’s chat to say that MLE for teams under the cap won’t affect their overall salary cap level. I may be getting confused…

by Sactown_Loyalty19 on Dec 8, 2011 8:27 AM PST reply actions  

I think I read that too

It will count towards reaching the floor, but not the cap if I read right

by markdog333 on Dec 8, 2011 11:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Chuck Hayes is not Kenny Thomas or vice versa.

Chuck Hayes was never lucky enough to be around Larry Brown on a day when Ed Snider felt like kissing LB’s ass for the final time.

I’m never been concerned about Hayes ability to mesh with Cousins on the court. My concern with Cousins what kind of a player who could have his ear. Sharing alma mater’s is not enough to convince me that Chuck Hayes could have the kind of between the ears effect Cousins needs. Sure, there’s always a possibility that another veteran like Nene or Chandler doesn’t do that either. There’s always risks involved in anything you do. But, I still think the odds are higher that Chandler (especially) would have a greater chance of reaching Cousins than Hayes would. The sad thing is that Chuck Hayes is a low budget version of a “good move”. That’s what I’m upset at; not Hayes himself.

Chuck Hayes didn’t keep those stars (Pau, Dirk, Griffin, Amar’e, etc) from doing their thing. He probably just made it more physically painful. Additionally I’m not buying that Hayes is a better defender than Dalembert, Nene or Tyson Chandler. Not buying it at all. Hayes is effective at what he does, no doubt, but he is not the total package of those guys. You can cite anything you want; Synergy, DRtg, or even adjusted +/-. For the record, I find the DRtg, adjusted +/- and even in general Hayes’ talents impressive. (Although that year of 37.5 TS% is mind blowing.) Since it’s obvious that neither of us would agree on this, that’s the way it is. Agree to disagree is the spice of life.

Not arguing about John Salmons as that is a complete waste of time here. I’d be slamming my head with a force of infinite gravity into a wall and surviving before my viewpoint agrees with yours on that. As far as Tyreke Evans, DeMarcus Cousins and Jimmer Fredette carrying the offense, isn’t that one of the reasons they were drafted? (Especially in Cuz & Jimmer’s case?) At some point you’re going to need guys who don’t play with the ball and guys who do play with the ball. You need guys who will take a lot of shots and guys who don’t. That’s kinda how the NBA works. There is no such thing as an utopia of basketball in the NBA (aka ball movement all the time), and the only fool is you for believing in that sorta thing (if you are one of those fools). Not having a player who is dominate and uses a lot of possessions has as many negatives as positives. At the end of the day, and in many cases vs almost all teams, you need a guy who can score 1 on 1. Isolation basketball in the NBA is just a part of the deal whether you can accept that or not. (And I’m not talking about Salmons here.) How Tyreke, Cuz & Jimmer are able to consistently get shots will define their careers offensively. That’s just the name of the game.

Chuck Hayes will be loved by the fans in Sacramento. There is no doubt about that.

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 8, 2011 8:30 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

There are four scorers on this team

Five if you count Thornton (which I personally think is a done deal), so five scorers should be enough to get you the points you need. If DMC and Evans avg 25ish a game (which I think is what we should expect) then you only need guys like Jimmer, Marcus and Salmons to get ten to fifteen, that should be doable.

Your rotation is probably Tyreke, DMC, Salmons, Thornton, Hayes, JJ, Jimmer, JT, Whoever plays the wing besides Salmons. That’s a nine player rotation that should score enough. The question is going to be do they stop anyone from scoring. Hayes helps stop people from scoring for a lesser cost than Tyson Chandler.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 8:52 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Cisco

Donte, Honeycutt, whoever. That player will most likely be on the floor for about ten minutes a game. If the problem is that we’re not getting enough from the second wing then things are going to be going pretty well. I hope.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 8:59 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I don't think Kenny Thomas was the first thing in people's minds

I think it was a combination of two things.

1. The Maloofs talked about a big free agent splash as a reason for some of their salary cap moves. People held them to it.

2. I know nobody has vocalized this but I personally think the elephant in the room is Carl Landry and his advanced stats when we traded for him and whether they will translate from Houston to Sac.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 8:30 AM PST reply actions   3 recs

So what you're saying is that

Hayes is Landry 2.0? I don’t see it at all though, Landry and Hayes do completely different things.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 8:39 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

It just comes off as saying that we acquired Landry and how that will translate.

When in fact you’re pointing to how the Kings were not very successful with Landry and another player from the relatively same system could end up with the same result.

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 8, 2011 8:45 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

yeah

basically I think at the very least there is a knee jerk concern about how “the Kings were not very successful with Landry and another player from the relatively same system could end up with the same result.” In addition, I also think the concern is heightened a bit because Hayes perceived value is not in the traditional way we perceive value (points, rebounds, blocks, height) which in some ways (although different) Landry’s perceived value was also largely based on nontraditional ways of valuing players.

Is it rationale? I dunno but I think in a blink of an instant my brain started processing the potential signing this way and it’s probably a big part of why I first thing “Eh, I dunno about this.” It’s a quick reaction forming a bias and prejudice. And I personally think I am not the only one to make this quick connection in their brain.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 8:54 AM PST up reply actions  

Not speaking for anyone else..

…but that’s not my concern at all. I don’t think the issues with Landry apply to Hayes or vice versa. That’s just the way I see it though.

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 8, 2011 8:56 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

I agree with this

I don’t think the two are similar except that they both come from Houston.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 9:01 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

i wasn't trying to put words in your mouth sorry

I just mean that what Carl does and what Hayes does are totally different if similarly nebulous items. As you stated Carl was an efficient scoring type of player who came here in a trade did well and then collapsed under the weight of expectations in a contract year. Hayes is a guy who did well (at what he does best, which isn’t very pretty) in a contract year and is getting a reward for that.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 9:17 AM PST up reply actions  

Landry is just what he always was

an offensively skilled third big man who doesn’t rebound well and is average on D – and can be worn down. Not to mention a great guy.

It’s what I said he was when we traded for him, it’s what he ended up being – it’s what he is.

"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."
- Chessmaster Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower

by lietothegirls on Dec 8, 2011 9:39 AM PST up reply actions  

I think we were expecting much better offense out of him

A “frontcourt Kevin Martin” is what most of us were thinking.

I suspect this was a PW issue though.

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 9:43 AM PST up reply actions  

I think that expecting a front court Kmart

is exactly what cause Landry to fail he couldn’t live up to that expectation. Doesn’t make him a bad guy just makes him human, very few players can be the focal point of a team.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 9:48 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm not sure he has a for-real "system"

Carl’s a good player, but he never found a niche. And with constantly rotating lineups, I don’t know how comfortable any of these guys could get offensively.

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 10:31 AM PST up reply actions  

And this is what confounds me

If memory serves, Carl’s rep was based in large part on being a good low post scorer. If that’s the case, then why is allowed to devolve in to a 20 foot jump shooter?

by outrider on Dec 8, 2011 10:44 AM PST up reply actions  

Answer

Posting Carl down low impacted Tyreke’s ability to drive to the basket so Carl got pulled out to the perimeter so as to clear the lane for Evans. And that was the beginning of the end for Carl.

"Live Long and Prosper." - Spock

by hozr on Dec 9, 2011 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

This is great analysis

Rec’d.

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 9:43 AM PST up reply actions  

Landry had/has a nice 12 foot jumper

For some reason he started taking it from 15-18

"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."
- Chessmaster Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower

by lietothegirls on Dec 8, 2011 9:46 AM PST up reply actions  

nice response

My bigger concern is that Hickson falls into the same offensive trap as Landry, because he shares a similar offensive profile.

what’s funny is my initial reaction was “but we are going to try and groom Hickson so Hayes might have to ride in the backseat a bit.” (by the way, when I talk about my reaction in this thread I am talking about my immediate reaction)

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 9:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Will be interesting to see how the front court play out

And if our coaches are equip to handle it. I am hoping that Smart lives up to his reputation as a savvy offensive coach and helps us to better maximize our potential.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Dec 8, 2011 9:57 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

On Hayes?

I thought nice pickup, but too long of a contract.

I would still like to see a bigger deal, but I think that realistically we’ve known it was’t coming from this free agency crop. I just hope we don’t make bad, short term decisions to appease the fan base. Cap space can still be used in the future or in trades as we see how our young uns are developing.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Dec 8, 2011 1:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Okay

Just to let you know, my comment was specifically in regards to the “meh” opinion that a lot of people had right away and it was an educated guess where the initial distate of the move was coming from. I just thought the whole K9 angle that Ziller was going after here was less of an initial factor than Landry even if people didn’t vocalize it as much as they did K9 jokes and regardless of fairness or whatever.

Obviously I could be wrong about what was going on and it certaintly could be something that never for a second was a factor in your head for even a split second (and perhaps the K9 one Ziller is talking about wasn’t there either). I just want to make sure people understand I am not calling Hayes Landry here.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 1:48 PM PST up reply actions  

damn it

sorry, the first sentence of the second paragraph reds wrong.

Obviously I could be wrong about what was going on generally and I am not trying to say you specifically thought that at all here (and you clearly have told me no that is not remotely a factor you yourself considered). Sorry.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 1:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Hayes isn't a risk to disappoint

Maybe that’s because the bar is so low, particularly on the offensive side. He will add toughness and defense, and those things never go out of style.

Hickson could easily become another Landry. Lots of similarities: offensive-minded player on a team full of chuckers. Hopefully he focuses on the boards and lets the rest of the game come to him.

"His D was a difference at the end."

by NewEraKings on Dec 9, 2011 9:18 AM PST up reply actions  

Unfortunately

That’s mostly on coaching and system. This two things haven’t changed. I’m not a fire Westphal guy but if he can’t get these guys to score 110 ppg I will be disappointed.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 8:55 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

LOL Wally.

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 8, 2011 8:58 AM PST up reply actions  

...

Photobucket

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 9:01 AM PST up reply actions   4 recs

ha ha

yeah, yeah, fine throw facts at me.

All I’m saying is that with the lineup as it is presently constituted there should be no problem getting to around 110

Tyrkeke 22ppg
DMC 24 ppg
MT 18 PPG
Salmons 12 PPG
Hayes 8 PPG

That’s 84 PPG right there if we can’t get 26 points from four other players then there’s a pretty big problem in and of itself. I know it’s not that easy or every team would score 160+. I’m just saying that between Jimmer, JT, JJ, CiscoDonteHoneycutt, and Isiah Thomas we should be able to get 24 points on a regular basis.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 9:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Wow

you think those five players are going to throw up 84 a game?

That’s … generous.

Back in 2004-2005 the Suns averaged 110.4 PPG. They did it with a combination of the highest offensive rating (114.5) in the league and the fastest pace in the league (95.9 possessions). Their top five scorers were Amare, Marion, Joe Johnson, Nash, and QRich. Those guys threw up 92.9 points combined. I have to tell you, those 5 Kings players are not going to be that close to the top five 2004-2005 Suns players. That is unless the Kings become much much much more efficient offensively.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 9:24 AM PST up reply actions  

seriously we scored 99 ppg last year and

we added Salmons and Jimmer I’m no huge fan of that necessarily, but you can’t tell me that we can’t get even 9 -11 more points per game out of those two than we did out of Cisco and Luther Head? It just boggles the mind I mean i see where it’s obvious we won’t score 110 or whatever but I guess I’m just overestimating.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 10:19 AM PST up reply actions  

It doesn't quite work like that-

A basket made by Salmons is as much an increase in scoring at his position as it is a basket not made by Tyreke. Bottom line is that 110ppg is an unrealistic expectation for any team in the NBA.

by lead_pipe on Dec 8, 2011 10:23 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree

and I know that rationally, like in my head it’s obvious, i just also can’t seem to let it go either it should be easy. Alas.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 10:25 AM PST up reply actions  

I think it would be a huge improvement if this team could get their averages up to 102 or 103 per game

And their defense continues it’s gradual improvement – that combination would translate to more wins.

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 10:33 AM PST up reply actions  

I see what you're saying

like I said rationally it’s ridiculous to think we should be scoring 110 a game or whatever. Then I look at the roster and I go well…

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 10:39 AM PST up reply actions  

I doubt Tyreke will put up 22 and DMC will put up 24

Since we’ve added Hickson, Jimmer and we’ll have a full year of Thornton and we traded for (dear God) John Salmons. Doesn’t defeat your larger point, that the offense should improve – but it means those guys are going to be taking shots away from Reke and DMC. I highly doubt they get to those averages.

Phoenix is the only team in the league the last few years that’s gotten to 110 points per game. And considering how craptastic our offense was last season, you may want to shoot for 102 or 103 per game this year before you assume offensive greatness.

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 9:26 AM PST up reply actions  

perhaps my projections for Demarcus are high

I think he should be able to get to around 24-25 consistently, he has the talent to do so and he has the desire to do, so the question is does he have the head to stay in the game to do so?

as for the rest of it.

I don’t know I just look at the stats I figure out where people should regress and progress and that’s what I come up with.
our pace last year was 95.2 that should go up
our ORTG was 103 that should definitely go up
we score 99.4 PPG last year that should go up

I’m not saying we can stop anyone but we should be able to score like the dickens

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 9:36 AM PST up reply actions  

We shall see
he has the talent to do so and he has the desire to do

Not sure I agree.

And don’t forget, averaging 24 or 25 in this league isn’t exactly easy. Only eight players in the entire league did that last season.

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 9:41 AM PST up reply actions  

like i said that projection is optimistic

to say the least but even if we lower that to say 18 ppg that means we can’t get 30 from the bench, the whole bench. I mean 30 seems like a lot but statistically we should be able to get 30.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 9:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Strongly disagree

our pace last year was 95.2 that should go up
our ORTG was 103 that should definitely go up
we score 99.4 PPG last year that should go up

Our pace was 4th in the league. “If” it goes up, it will hardly go up and that is a big “if.” If our pace is still at 95.2, we’d have to have an ORTG of 115.54. If our pace jumps up to the highest in the league last year, it would be at 96.5 (Twolves, and the highest I have ever seen) and we’d have to have an ORTG of 113.99.

Even in the Kings glory years they never had an ORTG that high (115.54 or 113.99) and if they did it would be one of the historically greatest seasons in the NBA (especially given the pace they would need which would be historically fast).

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 9:47 AM PST up reply actions  

and no way Cousins can get 24 that quickly

his efficiency needs to increase dramatically and his foul rate needs to decrease dramatically. We are talking miracle level if in one year.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 9:48 AM PST up reply actions  

You're most likely correct wally

I don’t hink that our pace can go much above 96 and our ORTG to maybe about 110-112, but efficiency is going to be the problem for sure.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 9:53 AM PST up reply actions  

in 01-02

we scored 104.6 on a pace of 95.6 with an ORTG of 110 so clearly my thoughts of 110 per game are out of line.

That said I don’t think that offense should be our problem and I would expect our ORTG to improve dramatically (say five points) while our pace remains consistent I don’t think it’s outlandish to think we should be one of the best scoring teams in the league next year.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 10:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Cousins won't avg 24

I’m totally in the ‘Cousins is gonna be a Star’ camp but 24 points a game puts him in that Category THIS year, among the top big man scorers in the league – not realistic.

"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."
- Chessmaster Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower

by lietothegirls on Dec 8, 2011 9:41 AM PST up reply actions  

I will agree that 24 is probably more wishful thinking on my part

but when i look at the package i see million dollar talent and ten cent head written all over it.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 9:43 AM PST up reply actions  

No, the guy IS smart

just immature.
That could change quickly, slowly – or not at all that crazy NBA world.

"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."
- Chessmaster Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower

by lietothegirls on Dec 8, 2011 9:44 AM PST up reply actions  

I'll be stoked if Cousins hits 24 ppg as a career-best 5 years from now.

I’ll do anything he tells me to for the rest of my life if he pulls that off this year.

"Where hope goes to die"

by napg on Dec 8, 2011 8:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I think you are expecting too much from Tyreke and Cousins

Based on what they’ve produced so far. I think the other numbers are reasonable and you can get the 26 points from the bench.

"His D was a difference at the end."

by NewEraKings on Dec 9, 2011 9:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Landry was great in the first half season after the trade.

The entire frontcourt underperformed badly in the first half of last season, and I’m guessing the constantly changing pecking order and minutes fluctuation had something to do with it.

by Tom Ziller on Dec 8, 2011 11:57 AM PST up reply actions  

Already said this in the thread

but again, I was talking about perception. My comment is about snap judgments, the type of stuff you read about in Malcolmb Gladwell books, and the type of stuff that doesn’t entirely line up with reality. The question is whether most Kings fans (and given I only got 3 rec’s probably not likely) went through the same biased quick logic in their head when they heard the deal.

Regardless of facts, if most Kings fan had a general perception of Landry being heralded as the forward version of Kevin Martin despite his height and one dimensional advanced stat value (although yes, very very good at it) and then he failed when he came here, the particulars might not matter a ton when they are making snap judgments.

Now, if everyone remembered the particulars right off the bat then maybe people wouldn’t factor in their head that Landry came from Houston, was short for his position, and the advanced stats show he has one very unique and very important skill. I was guessing above though that a lot of the initial “meh” was coming from people though making these snap judgments. I am not saying the snap judgments should matter or are important in the grand scheme of things. I am just saying I have a feeling, although there were a bunch of K9 jokes and no talk of Landry, this was going on in the back of people’s minds when they first heard of the rumor.

Again, it was about perception and snap judgments. Was not saying they accurately describe the realities of the situation.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

(plus usually would rather go for talent than fit).

That’s actually bullshit because I was one of those dumbasses that was not excited by the idea of Tony Parker (and yes, that sure seems dumb in retrospect).

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 8:33 AM PST up reply actions  

lol wally

Glad you finally came around.

GREENE! You’ve been superfluously apostrophe’d! - andy sims
iashwash, you are the voice of reason - Holmdel

by iashwash on Dec 8, 2011 9:21 AM PST up reply actions  

Hayes is a limited offensive player … which means that Evans, Jimmer and Cousins will be required to bear the heavy load on that end

lol, got some great visuals at the moment.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 8:40 AM PST reply actions  

I think the Hayes/Hickson will be awesome

Think about, put Hayes on Pau for 10 minutes, make him work for his shots, get in his face, anger him, make him pass off to Jason Kapono. Then, when Pau is sulking and Kobe is yelling at him, bring in JJ to take advantage. Start the 3rd the same way, then put Hayes back on the floor in the 4th to bring the defense. I like this move, a lot. People I know who follow the Rockets say Hayes is one of the best unknown players in the league.

by Rob Rodgers on Dec 8, 2011 8:46 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

This makes me smile
hen, when Pau is sulking and Kobe is yelling at him

by LPKingsFan on Dec 8, 2011 8:50 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

You forgot
…and Mike Brown is smiling like an idiot on the sidelines.

" 1 + 1 = 3 " - David Kahn

by Shizzo on Dec 8, 2011 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Word to the wise, CP3...

just replaced Pauting Baby and Odom.

Tariq Abdul-Wahad sings all of your favorite love songs on this 2-record set, "The Rookie & The Nookie." A stack of wax that’ll take your woman to the max!

Side note: This project just resulted in me comparing and contrasting the stats and values of Tariq Abdul-Wahad and Luther Head. Look what you’ve done to us, David Stern. Just look. You monster.

Thanks Exhibit G!!

by killerking on Dec 8, 2011 5:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Proof?

Everything said in the article makes sense abt Chuck’s defensive ability, but do we have any stats abt how he has actually performed against some of the names listed? (ie. Blake, Amare, Dirk, Pau, etc.)

by gregory l on Dec 8, 2011 8:50 AM PST reply actions  

Check some of the youtube videos from the previous post...

Some good ones of him rendering Blake, Amare, Dirk, and Garnett ineffective. Stats are good too, but they don’t measure just how much he frustrates these elite scorers. (especially Amare…I just felt bad for him at the end of that clip)

by Gabraham on Dec 8, 2011 8:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Good Stuff

He’s a scrapper. Blue-collar. Love it.

BTW, single tear runs down my cheek when I see that our blog has over 500 comments abt Chuck F’n Hayes!!

by gregory l on Dec 8, 2011 9:29 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Here's their career matchup stats.

Hayes holds Griffin, Nowitzki, and Gasol all below their typical efficiency.
Amare, on the other hand, destroys Chuck.

Blake Griffin vs Hayes
Nowitzki vs Hayes
Stoudamire vs Hayes
Gasol vs. Hayes

by unfair weather on Dec 8, 2011 10:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Man, I hate listening to other teams' announcers.

But that Chuck Hayes is an impressive combination of thick ’n quick.

"If you're going to lead the orchestra, you have to turn your back on the audience." -Geoff Petrie

by AnotherStupidSN on Dec 8, 2011 11:37 AM PST up reply actions  

?

Photobucket

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 12:27 PM PST up reply actions   4 recs

I'm not sure what I'm supposed to take away from those stats

other than the 4 players put up 16-17 shots and averaged 20-26 points per game. That means the team will have to make up the difference between those points and Hayes 3-5 per game.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 8, 2011 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

All teams have to make up the points between those guys and their guy.

They’re the top scoring big men out there.

And note that Hayes minutes are only around half of theirs in those head to heads.

Three of the guys were a little below their normal efficiencies. Griffin, in particular threw up some clunker games against Hayes. Stoudamire has matched up with him well.

That’s all that can be taken from it.

by unfair weather on Dec 8, 2011 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Where's the love for MT23?

Seriously? Tyreke, DMC and…..and Jimmer?!? carrying the offense? Thornton is a PROVEN scorer and averaged 20+ppg last year. How is he not one of the most important pieces on the offensive side of the ball? Any spark that Jimmer can add off the bench will be a bonus, but that’s all. I really hope Westphal doesn’t REQUIRE Jimmer to bear a heavy load, not with MT23 around.

by shaydbrayd on Dec 8, 2011 8:51 AM PST reply actions   2 recs

Use that 'reply' button

But I think you’re looking at above and it was clearly stated that MT23 was probably a sure thing as well.
For me, that’s a whole lot of guards that have to play for us to score . . .

"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."
- Chessmaster Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower

by lietothegirls on Dec 8, 2011 9:00 AM PST up reply actions  

I think we have to make sure Marcus is back on the team first.

which seems to be likely, but you never know.

Author of NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Dec 8, 2011 9:16 AM PST up reply actions  

If that doesn't happen

I may jump off the Burj Dubai.

/old school

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 9:26 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

I'm going to join you.

/ still loves that joke

No mistakes in the tango, Donna. Not like life. Simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get all tangled up, you just tango on.....

by pookeyguru on Dec 8, 2011 9:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Yes but in 38 mpg

With Tyreke healthy and Jimmer seal 1st round player minutes, Marcus’ scoring is going to be down along with his minutes. So, I’d put Thorntons contribution at about 15 per game, which is what he averaged his 1st season playing 26 mpg.

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 8, 2011 3:19 PM PST up reply actions  

I sure hope the team isn’t going to resign Thornton (some reports state it could be about 7 mil a year to keep him) only to reduce his role next year. He was the most consistant King last year, with or without Tyreke on the floor. Jimmer shouldn’t eat into any of Thornton’s minutes, but rather fill the minutes void that Beno left when he got traded.
Also, the Kings played some of their best ball last year when they went to a 3 guard lineup w/ Beno, MT23, and Reke (near 20 pt comeback with that lineup in finale against the Lakers).

by shaydbrayd on Dec 8, 2011 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Chill out guys!!!!

Just imagine what he can do at practice and share his knowledge with dmc, jj, thompson and whiteside. On offense it will prepare DMC to be better if he is paired with hayes at practice and on defense there is just so much to learn from this guy. Just hope that our young guns are willing to learn. Watch him play defense againts top stars and I think he is the best defensive big man and he is a pest.

by jayzfelon on Dec 8, 2011 9:10 AM PST reply actions  

I cannot wait for a Chuck Hayes triple double

Statistically unlikely, but the Arena-Formerly-Named-Power-Balance will literally crumble when this happens.

by clicc916 on Dec 8, 2011 9:26 AM PST reply actions  

This leaves the question

Do we still have the problem of not having a dependable front court scorer minus DMC – and what happens when he get into foul trouble?

I guess we’ll have to see how JJ does.

"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."
- Chessmaster Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower

by lietothegirls on Dec 8, 2011 9:59 AM PST reply actions  

pretty much

DMC is groomed for center, Hickson is the 2nd guy we have our hopes on while Hayes and JT are the backup role players with Whiteside playing the heel.

by wallywagon11 on Dec 8, 2011 10:01 AM PST up reply actions  

I think it's a mix of Hickson and Evans/Salmons post ups

Then again, you can count all of the dependable front court scorers in the league on about 2 hands

by SPTSJUNKIE on Dec 8, 2011 10:12 AM PST up reply actions  

Gasol
Howard
Love
Amare
Bosh
Dirk
Jefferson
Randolph
Cousins
Griffin

yeah two hands is about right, that’s just off the top of my head

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 10:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Horford
Scola

Three hands!

I cannot agree with those who rank modesty among the virtues. To the logician all things should be seen exactly as they are, and to underestimate one’s self is as much a departure from truth as to exaggerate one’s own powers.
--Holmes, on Modesty

by Donovan Jeska on Dec 8, 2011 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I wasn't a huge fan at first

but after watching some highlights of Chuck, I really like this signing. He isn’t the sexiest of pickups but every good team needs a defensive stopper. I think of Chuck as a Bruce Bowen type of player. Bowen made a living by making the other team’s best player work very hard for his offense. That alone can have a very big impact on a game even if it doesn’t show up in the box score.

"The mustache is the epitome of all that is manly" -George Parros

by Cincy Kings Fan on Dec 8, 2011 10:08 AM PST reply actions  

waste of money

watch a playoff series of chuck against elite big men then you can stop calling him a defensive stopper. the guy is like a knuckballer in baseball – coach’s like them because they eat up 200+ innings every year but you don’t really want them in your rotation come playoff time.

with JJ, JT, DMC, HW on the roster already and DJ available if you want him – not worth $20M to have a guy just take up space. what the kings need is a shot blocker to help Jimmer, MT on defense. Hayes won’t fill that role and the D is going to look very similar to when B52 and Hawes were back there on D.

you’d be better off paying dalembert or chandler than going with an undersized big that ultimately will get outplayed by JT, DMC & JJ in the rotation.

by Madzillagd on Dec 8, 2011 10:18 AM PST reply actions  

SHOTBLOCKING

guarding a guy in the post and being able to be a help defender by blocking shots are two different things. Hawes, Miller and Hayes are all poor shot blockers.

This team needs a shot blocker and that’s what SD does. Losing SD and signing Hayes doesn’t help IMO. The help defense is going to suffer. Everybody crucified Beno for his weak defense but that defense didn’t seem as bad when he had SD behind him instead of Hawes.

JJ can block shots – but will signing Hayes put him 4th in the big man rotation?

by Madzillagd on Dec 8, 2011 1:21 PM PST up reply actions  

It's going to help Houston, who'll probably sign SD

"If you don't have anything good to say, LIE" - Mom
The greatest impact player in NBA History - Tim Donaghy

by HighTops on Dec 8, 2011 3:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Or perhaps Nene now

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

David Thorpe

was asked in his chat about what he thought about Hayes to the Kings … his response …

I think they have made many head scratching decisions the past 6 years, but this is not one of them. It’s the no-brainer of the year.

by Dub_TC on Dec 8, 2011 10:24 AM PST reply actions  

If SAC can't land Chandler at least hope GSW doesn't either.

GSW reportedly offered 4 year 60 million, but Knicks emerge as front runner:

KBergCBS Ken Berger
Multiple league executives say the Knicks are now in the lead to land Tyson Chandler, jumping in front of the Warriors.

Setting up roster to land CP3 in 2012.

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Dec 8, 2011 10:38 AM PST reply actions  

if they have Carmelo

Amare and Chandler how are they going to afford Paul?

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 10:40 AM PST up reply actions  

How do they afford Chandler right now

unless they amnesty Billups?

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Dec 8, 2011 10:41 AM PST up reply actions  

Not sure That would be enough (?)

and yes, where would the cap room come from next year?

"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."
- Chessmaster Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower

by lietothegirls on Dec 8, 2011 10:46 AM PST up reply actions  

thats the plan
WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
As @KBergCBS reports, Knicks preparing huge offer for Tyson Chandler. Source tells Y! there’s scenario where Billups get amnesty, or traded.

And this:

alanhahn Alan Hahn
Most logical third team in money deals would be Sacramento, which needs to get to salary floor. Best scenario for Billups is a return to DEN

Don’t see whats in it for us.

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Dec 8, 2011 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Yeah and final year of contract

Could bring in an asset from Knicks. Help our team. And potentially be swung before deadline to a contender for another asset or open up more cap space for next season if we aren’t satisfied with what we are getting this year.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Dec 8, 2011 11:08 AM PST up reply actions  

Have you looked at the Knicks roster?

Who pray tell would be an asset?

"Victory goes to the player who makes the next-to-last mistake."
- Chessmaster Savielly Grigorievitch Tartakower

by lietothegirls on Dec 8, 2011 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Fields, Shumpert, Rauman, Douglass

Nothing I would trade a star player for. But some smaller pieces to roll the dice on for holding salary for them.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Dec 8, 2011 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

The speculation is Amare will be offered to NO for Paul.

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Dec 8, 2011 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Bad move for NO

Why rebuild around a 29 y/o PF with bad knees?

I would work on a deal with GS or the Clips and if Paul balks, just let him walk and sign with the Knicks for their exemption.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Dec 8, 2011 11:16 AM PST up reply actions  

Really the only way Chuck Hayes will be successful on the Kings

Is if Cousins learns FAST how to anchor a defense. Because as good as a man-to-man defender Hayes is, he’s not much use as a help defender. He’s not a rim-protector and we desperately need one.

I’m really upset that this likely means Sammy is gone. He’s a legitimate defensive anchor.

by Scirocco on Dec 8, 2011 10:45 AM PST reply actions  

well said.

i think people are ignoring what the Kings need vs what Hayes brings.

by Madzillagd on Dec 8, 2011 11:12 AM PST up reply actions  

This is an important point

Cousins is going to need to be focused defensively and avoid getting into constant foul trouble.

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 11:15 AM PST up reply actions  

Ha, could be worse Kings fans. I'll take Hayes over DeAndre at half the price
ESPNSteinLine Marc Stein
RT @sam_amick: Source says Golden State expected to make hard run at RFA DeAndre Jordan if/when New York wins out on Chandler (CO-SIGN)
ESPNSteinLine Marc Stein
Source close to Tyson Chandler talks just told ESPN.com: “It’s 98 percent sure that Tyson is going to wind up with the Knicks.”

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Dec 8, 2011 10:54 AM PST reply actions  

HAND DOWN MAN DOWN

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 11:15 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

This is why the NBA is great

Mark Jackson as head coach with no experience barking out awesome cliches.

Omri as starting ‘3’ trying to check LeBron and Paul Pierce.

Ricky Rubio vs. Tyreke Evans 4 times this year.

Ricky Rubio vs. Jimmerm 4 times this year.

8 games in 11 days starting 12/26/11!

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Dec 8, 2011 11:28 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

More Twitter News
WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Tayshaun Prince will sign a four year, $27 million dollar deal to stay with Detroit, league sources tell Y! Sports.

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Dec 8, 2011 10:56 AM PST reply actions  

I seriously don't get this

I thought Prince hated Detroit?

Author of NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Dec 8, 2011 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

And he makes so much sense for a rebuilding team

Detroit is just delaying the inevitable.

Author of NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Dec 8, 2011 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Yea, I totally don't get it from Detroit's POV

What’s the point?? They should be in full rebuild mode.

" 1 + 1 = 3 " - David Kahn

by Shizzo on Dec 8, 2011 12:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Per Woj
The new ownership of Tom Gores, the hiring of coach Lawrence Frank and the bond with general manager Joe Dumars helped sway Prince back to the chance to finish his career with Detroit.

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Dec 8, 2011 11:01 AM PST up reply actions  

competition! From Amick

According to Chuck Hayes’ agent, The #Sacramento #Kings & #Minnesota #Timberwolves are on equal ground in attaining Hayes. #NBA #Rockets

by Dub_TC on Dec 8, 2011 11:03 AM PST reply actions  

lol

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Dec 8, 2011 11:06 AM PST up reply actions  

Was just about to post this.

Lol. All this panic/celebrating and it’s not even a done deal yet. Oh well, there’s always Hawes :)

by SPTSJUNKIE on Dec 8, 2011 11:07 AM PST up reply actions  

I don't know what's worse

That our big free agent pickup could be Chuck Hayes, or that we might lose him out to KHAAANNNNN!!!!

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 11:18 AM PST up reply actions  

I'm guessing this move is Adelman influenced

from working with Hayes in Houston.

Author of NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Dec 8, 2011 11:35 AM PST up reply actions  

you know what's sad is we can't even get

mid level free agents to come here when we (very very slightly) over pay them how are we ever going to attract a guy like Gasol, Chandler etc. It sucks to be the laughing stock of the league sometimes.

by Lotusprime on Dec 8, 2011 11:53 AM PST up reply actions  

Chuck is from Modesto

I can’t imagine he’d choose starting a season in Minnesota in late December over coming home – unless they attained “equal ground” by offering more money… but what do i know, I’m not even on twitter

by lchristmas on Dec 8, 2011 1:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Hayes May Not Be Ours Yet
ChrisBHaynes Chris Haynes
According to Chuck Hayes’ agent, The #Sacramento #Kings & #Minnesota #Timberwolves are on equal ground in attaining Hayes. #NBA #Rockets

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Dec 8, 2011 11:04 AM PST reply actions  

See, this is why I wasn't flipping out yesterday

Free Agency hasn’t even started yet people.

Author of NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Dec 8, 2011 11:10 AM PST up reply actions  

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Dec 8, 2011 11:16 AM PST up reply actions   3 recs

The sky was falling in that movie though. :)

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 11:19 AM PST up reply actions  

In most polarizing arguments, the truth is found somewhere in the middle.

Follow me on Twitter
Author of Inside-Out Game

by Exhibit G on Dec 8, 2011 11:51 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Kings marketing slogan should read: 2012 Sacramento Kings: Ballin' on a Budget

Sad that we have to look up at Golden State again as having superior/aggressive ownership .

Of course, the Bay Area media did their part in turning public opinion against Chris Cohan so he was compelled to sell to an owner who wants to invest in the team and win. The Sacramento mass media outlets are still giving the Maloofs a pass.

by fire_voisin on Dec 8, 2011 11:07 AM PST reply actions  

Hayes shutting down Amare

For anyone hating on the Chuchwagon, check out this video of him locking up Amare Stoudemire.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6f5Uyu6Dv4

by garylicious on Dec 8, 2011 11:19 AM PST reply actions  

Sheesh, I didn't realize we were getting Bill Russell

He locks down everyone!

Amazing that he can only get offers from the Kings and T-Wolves.

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 11:20 AM PST up reply actions   3 recs

...

He sure doesn’t LOOK 4 inches shorter than Amar’e.

I cannot agree with those who rank modesty among the virtues. To the logician all things should be seen exactly as they are, and to underestimate one’s self is as much a departure from truth as to exaggerate one’s own powers.
--Holmes, on Modesty

by Donovan Jeska on Dec 8, 2011 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

TWSS!

The endless pounding.
A hole, blacker than despair.
John Salmons is back.

by twasserm on Jun 23, 2011

by Dirkula on Dec 8, 2011 2:19 PM PST up reply actions   4 recs

May only be from that game

But I liked what I saw. He played great D with good effort. Liking this signing a little more now

Al Davis 1929-2011 Just rest in peace, baby

"Da greatness of Da Rooster" - RLangford

Follow me on Twitter @FernandoRGallo

by darooster on Dec 9, 2011 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

With

all the rumors of CP3 going to LA, Pau to Houston, Chandler to NYK ….. perfect time to go offer $$$ to Nene!!

by Dub_TC on Dec 8, 2011 11:31 AM PST reply actions  

This isn't why we're gonna sign him, but...

His jump hook is really, really pretty. He gets a full extension on his arm and puts great rotation on the ball.

I cannot agree with those who rank modesty among the virtues. To the logician all things should be seen exactly as they are, and to underestimate one’s self is as much a departure from truth as to exaggerate one’s own powers.
--Holmes, on Modesty

by Donovan Jeska on Dec 8, 2011 11:35 AM PST reply actions  

It's official.

Chuck Hayes IS Hakeem Olajuwon.

" 1 + 1 = 3 " - David Kahn

by Shizzo on Dec 8, 2011 12:32 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Caron Butler - 3 years, $24 million to the Clippers

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 12:33 PM PST reply actions  

Sorry, shouldn't have just dumped this here

Wonder if we need a general NBA chatter thread on the front page? Seems there will be tons happening in the next few days.

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Has the CBA been signed yet?

Can teams actually start signing players tomorrow? I’ve heard Friday for two weeks.

by bignerd on Dec 8, 2011 12:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd heard today for ratification of the deal by owners and players

Tomorrow for training camps and player signings. That’s off the top of my head though.

"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team." - Michael Jordan (Owner, Charlotte Bobcats)

by otis29 on Dec 8, 2011 12:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I think they postponed training camps

to Monday so that the rosters could settle somewhat.

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Dec 8, 2011 12:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Chuck Hayes is a solid addition

He’ll add a veteran presence to our young group of bigs and give Westphal some options. And save us some money to spend elsewhere in the process.

Adding Barea or someone similar would be a similar move: improve the team without putting a lot of money out there.

Everyone wants to sign the big names, but they aren’t coming here anyway until we improve and get closer to contender status. So let’s relish the opportunity to add solid if unspectacular pieces to our young core and hope those youngsters emerge. That’s really what the Kings have to bank on in any case.

"His D was a difference at the end."

by NewEraKings on Dec 9, 2011 8:52 AM PST reply actions  

Rockets fan here

Y’all are going to absolutely love Chuck. Without a doubt, the best inch-for-inch post defender I’ve ever seen. He shuts down everybody from Amar’e, Blake, KG and Dirk to Pau, David West, and Bosh. He’s just amazing, I’m going to miss him immensely. You got a steal.

Check out The Dream Shake.

by Patrick Harrel on Dec 9, 2011 2:33 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Kyle Lowry
Small
A Learning Experience on Loyalty For Sacramento Via Golden State
Lionel_small
#HereWeStay
Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration (UofL days)
Kings_sports_illustrated_small
Funny story
Small
As I sit here and watch the OKC Thunder come back against the Lakers
Waymantisdale-tz-150_small
the owners called down the thunder
Chief_petty_officer_small
Maturity in Sacramento Debacle
Small
Ryan Anderson to the Kings - Petrie's Gotta Give It A Thought
Chief_petty_officer_small
Open letter to the Maloofs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G