Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Kings are mentioned as a possible destination. Looks like they want to move up the draft.

11 months ago 103_2417_tiny Ellimist 530 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

why would they want garcia?

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Jun 21, 2011 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

If they're dealing Parker,

part of it is to shed salary.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

I offer the 7 and the 60

The 35 instead of the 60 if they twist my arm. But after that, not much. The Spurs need to shed salary, and there are only a few teams that can take Parker on without sending salary back in return.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 9:51 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

They are welcome to Pooh Jeter as well

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

you dont think it would take two number 1's?

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Jun 21, 2011 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ray Allen was worth a #5 pick

Richmond a #3. Jason Richardson a #8. The fact remains that San Antonio needs to shed salary and there are only a few teams that can take him off their hands without shackling them with at least some offsetting salary.

You can’t overlook the fact that Parker is 29, so you don’t want to mortgage the future of the franchise to land him. One or two picks out of this draft and Jeter might be the best deal that they find. I would part with Casspi if it were a deal breaker, but I’d prefer to hold onto to him, as he does have some value in relation to his contract. I can’t see inlcuding JT with Dalembert (or his replacement) not being in the fold.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

didnt think about that. good points.

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Jun 21, 2011 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Make it so!

Even if it was just for the 7th pick. I’m sure the Kings could snag a gem that fell out of the lottery at #35.

by CloudyEyes on Jun 21, 2011 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

dude

they would not take anyone back, unless its a good young player, Maybe casspi, the want to shed salary.

by sacman on Jun 21, 2011 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Woj said on twitter
If Spurs deal Tony Parker to Kings for 7th pick, expect Omri Caspi to be part of package, sources say. RC Buford has been long fond of him.

by james_kevin18 on Jun 22, 2011 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes.

All of this years picks + any player but Tyreke, DMC & Thornton.

Plus next year’s lottery protected, possibly.

Also, a year’s supply of backrubs if that helps any.

This.

by elfboy_ on Jun 21, 2011 6:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Ez cowboy

That’s a little much. Just the #7 and not much more will do.

by ivAAron on Jun 21, 2011 11:14 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yes, please.

/ Wondering if I should change my signature

by kwill on Jun 21, 2011 6:39 PM PDT reply actions  

No thanks

Not a fan of pairing Tyreke with another non-shooting guard.

by Smills9133 on Jun 21, 2011 6:43 PM PDT reply actions  

He actually shot 52% from the floor last year

Now, he is not a 3-point shooter by any stretch of the imagination. But over the past two years, he has become more of a distributor and less of a chucker. At age 29 it looks like he has this point guard thing figured out. I think that he could make a nice backcourt pairing with Evans – Thunder & Lightning.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

And adds the veteran on-court leadership this team desperately needs

Multiple-championship experience, at that. Very intriguing idea.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

But we already have Beno's championship experience

and really how much did championship experience play into this years playoffs? I see “championship experience” being the same for veterans as “upside” is for youngsters…its a crock.

huh? wha?

by effin steve on Jun 21, 2011 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Both finals MVP’s, and both guys that have succeeded and failed on the NBA’s biggest stage.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I cannot explain Lebron James' failures

but for the most part, one player doesnt “want it more” or have more heart, the winner usually just gets hotter for a few games and their team’s role players typically perform better than the other team’s. Sometimes gameplanning and coaching can take a player out of a game or two but for most part star players will perform to their averages regardless of championship experience.

huh? wha?

by effin steve on Jun 21, 2011 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed 100%

“The ring is the thing” is overhyped when valuing the worth of a player. The funny thing is the players themselves do much of the hyping.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

and really how much did championship experience play into this years playoffs?

How about we worry about trying to make the playoffs first?

"You can have the knowledge that a tomato is a fruit, but it takes wisdom not to put it in a fruit salad." Jerry Reynolds

by kingsfan300 on Jun 21, 2011 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Last time I checked, this team won 24 games last season and 25 the season before

Experience at a high level for a player who played an active role in achieving multiple championships should be valuable in helping a team grow.

"You can have the knowledge that a tomato is a fruit, but it takes wisdom not to put it in a fruit salad." Jerry Reynolds

by kingsfan300 on Jun 21, 2011 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, hes valuable alright

50 Million dollars over the next 4 years kinda valuable!

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well that last year is not guaranteed

"You can have the knowledge that a tomato is a fruit, but it takes wisdom not to put it in a fruit salad." Jerry Reynolds

by kingsfan300 on Jun 21, 2011 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually,

$37.5 over 3 years. The 4th year is not guaranteed and has a $3.5m buyout. Conversely, the #7 pick will earn roughly $12m over the same 3 years. So net-net, Parker costs you about $26m more over a 3 year period.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think

hes worth it IF you think he can remain healthy (play a league average number of games; Im not asking for an ironman) but i dont think his championship experience should play into it.

huh? wha?

by effin steve on Jun 21, 2011 10:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not so much the "championship" experience,

but I think that his NBA experience will help the young team, and I think that his accomplishments earn him at least a bit of respect from his teammates.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well said

"You can have the knowledge that a tomato is a fruit, but it takes wisdom not to put it in a fruit salad." Jerry Reynolds

by kingsfan300 on Jun 21, 2011 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

Hes a proven player, its not like giving James Posey or even Austin Croshere the contracts that they got after Championship runs (croshere lost the finals but he for sure won the offseason). Thats why Im down to do it if we think he can maintain some semblance of health.

I would be most interested to see what other roster moves we make. Do we go with five guards (including Garcia) or do we let thorton walk or sign and trade, or try to trade beno? What could we reasonably expect in return for either one?

huh? wha?

by effin steve on Jun 21, 2011 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that you could move Beno

for a to-be-determined 2nd round pick, but not much else. If you wanted to move Cisco, you’d probably have to package Omri or JT.

I think moving Beno would be enough. With the addition of Parker, the subtraction of Udrih and the extension of Thornton, you would have 10 players at about $40m, plus your 2nd round picks (not including Darnell Jackson). That would leave you probably $15-$20m to add another player or two (I’d make a hard run at Marc Gasol).

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed on el flaco being untradeable.

Although a second rounder for Beno basically changes the deal to the number 7 and beno for Parker, disregarding the fact that Beno would not be going to SAntonio. Im still in, its hard to believe beno has that little value but it does lower the net cost of Parker.

huh? wha?

by effin steve on Jun 21, 2011 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

what im trying to say is

Tony Parker is effing hawt.

huh? wha?

by effin steve on Jun 21, 2011 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Meh.

Even though the voices aren't real, they have some pretty good ideas!

by LeaguePassAddict on Jun 22, 2011 8:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

By the way,

he was 4th amongst point guards in scoring, and led them in FG%., but he was only 8th in shots taken. Pretty efficient.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

The flip side of the coin

He is a high usage player. That said, he flourished sharing the ball with the likes of Duncan and Manu. Could sharing with Evans and Cousins be that much more difficult?

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:23 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

this

J.UST E.NJOY T.HIS S.HIT
This is Forty08.

by big_p.a.w.z. on Jun 21, 2011 8:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm referring to shooting outside the paint

Parker is one of the best in the league at scoring at the rim, or dropping that sweet tear drop.

However, I don’t like his age, contract or fit(distance shooting) to make that rich of deal.

If they want to dump Parker’s contract, that’s one thing. Asking for a top 7 pick AND dumping him is another. I’m just not interested in that.

by Smills9133 on Jun 21, 2011 7:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're certainly entitled to your opinion

Though I agree with virtually none of it. 29 is not old – it just seems old because the current team is so freakin’ young. And efficient is efficient. If he’s effective at the rim and mid-range, who cares if he is not gifted beyond the arc? Not me. And his contract is very reasonable for a player of his caliber.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

29 is not old

But 10 full years in the NBA, many of them deep into the playoffs, is a lot. He takes a bit of a beating too. How many more miles does a guy like that have?

by Toeontheline on Jun 21, 2011 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hard to tell

It depends on the guy, I suppose. Guys like Billups, Nash and Kidd have more miles, and they lasted well into their 30s.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Valid concern

Parker minus a step is not Parker. He will be 29, 30 and 31 at the beginning of the guaranteed seasons of his contract. Not without risk, but it’s not like we’re talking Rip Van Winkle here.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I don’t see an all star at 7 this year. The players that I see at 7 can be snagged 10-12 picks later in most drafts or via free agency.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Parker for the #7 is a no brainer.

And whether or not we buy into the whole “he has a ring” mantra, the King’s players will, and that’s what really matters.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 21, 2011 11:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well,

he’s played about 400 fewer games than Kobe, and well over 300 fewer than Steve Nash. I guess it just comes down to the player, his drive and passion, and blind ass luck.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

He can still run...

At age 29 that’s not bad at all. I believe he has a good 5-6 years left on him.

by mrbaka on Jun 21, 2011 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

6 point guards cracked the 20 mark for player efficiency last year

He was one of them, joining CP3, Rose, Westbrook, Deron Williams and Nash. Nice company.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Elite company

That’s one hell of a company. Lets hope Petrie is serious in considering this. Not sure who he’s going to give up for Parker but like I mentioned below #7+Omri+Jeter. We can pick up a good pg at 35.

by mrbaka on Jun 21, 2011 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

San Antonio needs to shed salary

$75m payroll and only half a roster. The 7, maybe the 60 and Jeter (if they want a backcourt body in return) is about as far as I would go. I wouldn’t let Casspi be a deal breaker, but I wouldn’t just give him away.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was perusing at Pounding the Rock

and they worry about their SF position. They might be very interested in Casspi.

"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!

by caseycheesecake on Jun 21, 2011 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's old when the average age of your team is 23/24

And the average age of your rebuilding core is sub 22.

by Smills9133 on Jun 21, 2011 8:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

That makes the team young

That does not make Tony Parker old.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

It makes him needed for our team

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

24

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually,

we have 10 guys under contract right now, with an average age of 24.6. Parker would be the 2nd oldest guy on the team, younger than Garcia and slightly older than Udrih.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with this

Parker serves only our short term interest. Dally makes sense because of Cousins’ development. But we already have a vet at the PG position in Beno. I’d prefer to add a veteran SF if possible

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Beno is not a vet

the same way that TP is a vet. Parker gets instant locker room cred.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 21, 2011 11:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

he is better than any player you'd get with 7

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Jun 21, 2011 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Is he better than any player at 7 + the money we could use on a veteran free agent

Because that’s a much more accurate assessment of the opportunity cost lost by adding Parker for that price.

by Smills9133 on Jun 21, 2011 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, he's a much better talent than any free agent out there IMO

But that’s a relevant question.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

And to continue the devil's advocate

Is he better than #7 + the possibility of dealing for a player under contract and absorbing that contract(say Josh Smith, Andre Iguodala, etc)

I’d prefer Josh Smith(who’s names being bandied about) on the Kings than Iggy or Parker(though I’d pick Iggy over Parker).

by Smills9133 on Jun 21, 2011 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sure they'd have interest in

Dalembert, Thompson, Whiteside, #7 overall pick, Casspi, Greene.

I’d love a SnT of Daly for Smith, but don’t think the Hawks would bite.

  1. and Casspi for Smith would give the Hawks two young, cheap assets and free up a ton of cash to re-sign Crawford and perhaps pursue a Center(Bogut maybe? using the TPE and the assets they have).

by Smills9133 on Jun 21, 2011 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd prefer Dwight Howard

But it probably ain’t happening.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Howard's name

isn’t realistically being thrown around in trade talk right now either.

by Smills9133 on Jun 21, 2011 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Neither is Igoudala or Smith

At least not for the #7 pick. Sure, we talk about it. But if Philly or Atlanta and the Kings aren’t talking about it, then it’s not being talked about

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm talking about Players who are rumored to be available

I’m only speculating on what some of our best available assets would be.

by Smills9133 on Jun 21, 2011 7:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Listen

Sixers said they dont want to just dump salary for Iggy. Doubt Atlanta would just dump Smith for #7. And finally, adding Smith could turn the Kings locker room into a gas chamber.

I doubt the Spurs would move Parker for just #7. It’d prolly take two 1st round picks or Jason Thompson (to replace McDyess) and Omri Casspi.

Children, before you go to sleep check under your bed for the BOOGIE MAN!!

by kingme18 on Jun 21, 2011 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Way way way no deal on that

I would like to thank all of you for the outpouring of support during my time of need. I proudly, and with great relief, announce that my C is now working on my laptop and any errors from now on are due to my inabilty to proofread. I use to proofread my stuff, but it began lowering my self esteem,
I have found it hard to sound intelligent if I think while I key. So in summary ; the worse the keying the smarter my comment. The proceeds from the HereWeFixTheC car wash have been forwarded to HereWeBuild . Thanks.

by ElRonToro on Jun 21, 2011 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I’m fine with the #7. Heck, take our #60 for one of your Euro stash jobs if you like. I’ll even throw in a Pooh Jeter with low miles. But that’s about it.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

u talked about absorbing Iggy and Smith contract for #7 didn"t u? I said it wasn’t feasible.

Children, before you go to sleep check under your bed for the BOOGIE MAN!!

by kingme18 on Jun 21, 2011 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Fair enough

This is all speculation anyway. Under those circumstances, I do like the age of Iguodala and Smith better. Of course, if our concern is the team three years from now, both Iguodala and Smith would need to be re-signed, all during a time where the team is going to have to worry about paying Evans and Cousins. Pick your poison, I suppose.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh god no

I’m definitely not on the Josh Smith bandwagon. But I would prefer Iggy to Parker myself. However, it sounds like Philly may not be treating Iggy as a salary dump.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

Honestly, no elite free agent (if there is one in this class) is dying to come to Sacramento, sorry especially with potential relocation.

Children, before you go to sleep check under your bed for the BOOGIE MAN!!

by kingme18 on Jun 21, 2011 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would like it

but, same with felton, this is an expiring contract. So I’d have to say no.

Phil Jackson, after treatment for a kidney stone "When the anesthesiologist leaned over me, he said "We named your kidney stone Kobe because it's not passing."

by Ellimist on Jun 21, 2011 6:49 PM PDT reply actions  

He's signed through 2013/14

/ Wondering if I should change my signature

by kwill on Jun 21, 2011 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

ah you're right

Draftexpress has let me down.

Phil Jackson, after treatment for a kidney stone "When the anesthesiologist leaned over me, he said "We named your kidney stone Kobe because it's not passing."

by Ellimist on Jun 21, 2011 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's actually signe through 2014-15

But that year has a $3.5m buyout (team option).

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I saw it as "unguaranteed" on Shamsports

How did you find it was a buyout?

/ Wondering if I should change my signature

by kwill on Jun 21, 2011 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

On Shamsports

Hold your cursor over the player’s name.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

I have much to learn.

/ Wondering if I should change my signature

by kwill on Jun 21, 2011 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I found it by mistake

I was mindlessly following a gnat on my screen with the cursor when I discovered the feature.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Then it was a Nattin' gnat
I was mindlessly following a gnat on my screen with the cursor when I discovered the feature

.

by betweentheeyes on Jun 21, 2011 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Parker would...

Bring a veteran presence which the team desperately needs!

However without Eva Longoria sitting in Kings Row 1, I can’t go for this. Plus this sounds like a made up internet story to drive up hits on Yahoo.

"I know everything there is to know about the greatest game ever invented." -Shooter, aka Dennis Hopper, Hoosiers.

by Rory Sparrow on Jun 21, 2011 6:54 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

In a heartbeat

He just turned 29 last month, he’s in the prime of his career, a top PG in the league, 3 time NBA champion, a true veteran presence, good defender, fast, excellent ball handler, etc.

I think at one time he liked the attention that having a Hollywood wife brought him playing in a small market & might have liked taking his talents to NY. But after the whole mess of his divorce & TMZ dragging him through the mud he might like taking a break from that life & resting in SacTown. He’d be the man here for now something he wasn’t in SA. This is all assumption on my part of course but he would be exactly the type of player we all say we need.

I love beating dead horses.

by allbenji's on Jun 21, 2011 7:10 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

29, but with some miles attached

Still, he’s certainly got a few productive seasons left you would think.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

My big question

is by the time we are actually ready to make a title run, will Parker still be effective? Much of his success is due to his speed and quickness. Will he still have it in 3, 4 years time? I’m not so sure. We need a veteran or two, but I think that at the PG position, Walker will be the better player in the long run.

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, it's not my money to spend

But I’d say he’d still be a nice investment for a team that needs to do some growing up.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

J Kidd just won a ring...

So if you’re asking if veteran PGs can win Championships, then I say, yeas they can!

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 21, 2011 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're giving up the 7th pick in a weak draft

You bring him in, it makes everyone on the squad better. It gets them closer to the playoffs, it gets everyone big game experience. He’s an expiring contract after 3 years (2 if you figure his $3.5m buyout in year 4). I’m not sure that there is a ton of downside here.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agree.

I see no downside here at all.

Even though the voices aren't real, they have some pretty good ideas!

by LeaguePassAddict on Jun 21, 2011 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

I honestly believe

If we could get Lebron James for the #7 pick at least 1 person here(if not more) wouldn’t like the trade. I know Parker isn’t James but James would also neva, eva, eva, eva, eva, eva, eva, become available to us. You have a chance at a guy of Parkers caliber for peanuts you jump at it.

I love beating dead horses.

by allbenji's on Jun 21, 2011 8:05 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think the C-Webb thing proves it

When you get a chance to grab an exceptional player, due to circumstance, you do it.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 8:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Even if Walker or Burks become borderline All-Stars?

I’m nots saying its necessarily a bad move, just think that Walker or Burks would make us more competitive in the long run.

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

This idea seems so myopic to me. It’s for the hear and now. And while i want to make the playoffs, I don’t want to rob the future for the present.

by Smills9133 on Jun 21, 2011 7:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Are we really that concerned about the #7 pick in a weak draft coming back to haunt us?

If we did make this trade, I think we could rest assured Petrie didn’t feel the players at #7 were all that valuable.

This is actually a Jimmer thing, isn’t it?

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Eh I'm looking more at Petrie's draft record. Even in the WEAKEST of drafts, or deep in the first round he finds gems

See Hedo, Peja, Martin, Wallace, etc

Trading the pick, takes away one of Petrie’s biggest strengths as a GM. And that’s finding starting quality talent or better.

In his near 20 years as GM he’s had maybe 2 flops(Olivier St. Jean, aka Tariq Abdul Wahad and Quincy Douby).

by Smills9133 on Jun 21, 2011 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agree with this

As I said though – if he makes this deal, he’s clearly not enamored with the talent available to him at that draft slot.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tony Parker is beyond starting caliber talent.

Nothing really left to discover.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 21, 2011 11:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

But what if he drafts the best player at 7

and it winds up being like Spencer Hawes at 10 (not a reach) or JT at 12 (also not a reach)? This is a weak draft.

If your argument is that a guy of Tony Parker’s caliber is not worth the #7 pick in this year’s draft, I will respectfully disagree.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, let's play "in theory"

Say you add Parker now and the on-court product improves. When his contract expires, you still have the option to resign him at a lesser amount, or let him go and sign another FA or sign and trade him.

But you’ll at least have started to build a winning environment for the young pups.

I do see the difference in philosophies here and do think it’s a gamble. But I think the #7 becoming a productive NBA player is more of a gamble than Tony Parker.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions   4 recs

This

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 21, 2011 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

+1

Sometimes you just have to look yourself in the mirror and say....Tyreke Evans.
That just happened.

by darkadun on Jun 22, 2011 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

But Parker will expedite the team's growth

He’s played point on an NBA champion. He makes the team better right now, and still leaves cap space to add another player.

There’s wishing and then there’s reality. If this is reality, you shelve all the wishing and grab it. It makes you better, and all you’re giving up is the #7 pick in a weak draft.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Smills is right on this one I think

When you put all parts of this trade together we are giving up too much for a short term benefit.

by Passive Sloth on Jun 21, 2011 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

The 7th pick in this year's draft is too much

for one of the top point guards in the league, a 3-time all star and a finals MVP? I respectfully disagree.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 9:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agree with wholeheatedly with Section

We need Parker’s experience and most of all his “efficiency”. He will demand the players around him get better, grow up, play defense, etc. He will dramatically cut down on the stupid turnovers and lack of ball movement.

Also, I can see him lasting well into his mid 30s. Even if he loses a step, he has a proficient mid range game, and he’s smart. He will just use the pick and roll more (as opposed to just breaking his man down off the dribble) to find a crease in the defense.

Lastly, he makes Sacramento a more realistic destination for other free agents. Add Parker and Shane Battier, resign Thorton and Dally, and you’ve got a team, at least on paper, that could give the rest of the league fits.

by R-Man on Jun 21, 2011 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lot of praise for a guy Pop has had to ride his entire career.

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Huh?

Pop has “riddnen” Duncan and Manu the same way. Are we now insinuating that Parker would have gone on a three state killing spree had he not been under the ever-watchful eye of SpongePop Squarepants?

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 9:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who gives a F about finding a "gem"

When we have a chance at aquiring a bonifide star who just turned 29 at a position of need? You know all the “who are we going pair with Reke?” talk we’ve been discussing since the night we drafted him? Well problem solved! Move on to the next order of business please.

I love beating dead horses.

by allbenji's on Jun 21, 2011 8:46 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yup!

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 21, 2011 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's a pretty big "if"

We know what Parker is.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

This

We’re tossing around about 40 different draft options at the #7 pick because no one is outstanding. I’d call it a win if we landed a core rotation player out of this draft. Parker is much more than that.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

It goes both ways though

We do know that Parker is the better talent right now. But what about in a few years when it matters most?

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 7:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does it matter most then?

Not sure I agree. This team is young enough IMO. Time to add some veterans that will help move this program along. And he’s not tying down your cap space for eternity.

I never understand worrying about what’s going to happen three years down the road when you have the chance to add an exceptional player now.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not a gambling man, so I'm agree with you.

"You can have the knowledge that a tomato is a fruit, but it takes wisdom not to put it in a fruit salad." Jerry Reynolds

by kingsfan300 on Jun 21, 2011 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think it does matter most then

because it will more than likely take us that long to be in position to make a strong playoff/title run. I also dont think it’s a stretch to say that Kemba Walker will be better than Tony Parker in 3 years time. In fact I think it’s more than likely. But yes, obviously Petrie is a better judge of that than I.

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that's extremely questionable (regarding Kemba)

But if that’s your feeling, I can see why you wouldn’t want to do it.

Kemba appears to be one of the bigger enigmas in the draft. Is he going to Toronto at the 5 or is he dropping? What if you pass on a Parker deal and Kemba’s not around?

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Respectfully disagree

Walker could become the next Bobby Jackson or the next Mateen Cleaves. If it were a slam dunk that he would be better than Parker in 3 years, he’d be long gone by the time we get to the 7th pick.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think saying Kemba Walker will be better than Parker

In three years is a stretch. But I also don’t think Walker is gonna be very good

Can't wait for October

by KingsFanInPortland on Jun 21, 2011 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

My take on Walker

Is that there are so many people around the league that are high on him. Steve Smith and Greg Anthony said that he could very well end up the best PG in this draft class. If he’s not available I like Burks.

I guess our disagreement comes from our differing views on the their talent and potential as well as our risk aversion

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nah

A lot of people aren’t sold on Walker as well. And I just don’t see how a guy with Iverson game and half the athleticism is gonna be a big time player. Too short, too ball dominant, too horrendous a defender……My opinions however. but some are based in fact

Can't wait for October

by KingsFanInPortland on Jun 22, 2011 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I like the talent available at the 7th pick

But the draft is still a gamble. Sometimes it’s better to go with the sure thing, especially with such a young team, where you never know what you’ll get from them every night.

"You can have the knowledge that a tomato is a fruit, but it takes wisdom not to put it in a fruit salad." Jerry Reynolds

by kingsfan300 on Jun 21, 2011 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep

People forget this is a weak draft.

Ssory Doc, I'm on the Twitters

by 49er16 on Jun 21, 2011 9:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes please.

7th pick, plus anyone not named Tyreke, Marcus, or DeMarcus

by dampania on Jun 21, 2011 7:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Either way

We can’t trade Marcus Thornton anyways.

Children, before you go to sleep check under your bed for the BOOGIE MAN!!

by kingme18 on Jun 21, 2011 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would do this, with some reservations

Parker is not a good deep shooter, and he has benefitted over the years from playing with greats like Duncan and Manu. That said, he has not been a volume shooter for the past couple of years (averaging about 13.5 shots per game) while shooting about 50% from the floor. He has 3 years guaranteed at a reasonable $12.5m per, followed by a $12.5m option year that can be bought out for $3.5m. His arrival would place him and Evans in the starting backcourt, with Thornton as 6th man. Udrih would need to go.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:11 PM PDT reply actions  

I know Udrih left on bad terms but

He’s so much better now then he was then, he would only be needed to back up George Hill for a few seasons, & he knows the system over there. So it wouldn’t be that far fetched to see him go back.

Maybe Parker & his salary aren’t needed in SA at this point in time but I Hill is still young & probably needs a decent vet to back him up.

I love beating dead horses.

by allbenji's on Jun 21, 2011 7:38 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

lets be honest though

Parker isn’t exactly a stopper, but he still plays a lot.

Phil Jackson, after treatment for a kidney stone "When the anesthesiologist leaned over me, he said "We named your kidney stone Kobe because it's not passing."

by Ellimist on Jun 21, 2011 8:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

He benefits greatly

from San Antonio’s defensive scheme. His only job is to funnel his guy to the middle.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sure Tony

picked up a few tricks in San Antonio defensively.

Children, before you go to sleep check under your bed for the BOOGIE MAN!!

by kingme18 on Jun 21, 2011 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

But Beno’s exodus from San Antonio was not pretty – he and Pop had some words. Plus San Antonio only makes this deal to shed salary.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nice.

I agree with your opinion.

"Contraction, I didn't say anything about contraction. I'm talking about shrinking the league." - Lebron James

Thanks Lebron, for reminding me how miserable my life is.

by DTG13 on Jun 21, 2011 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like this deal...

And IMO increases the chances of SammyD resigning. Reke better be workin’ on his jumper because Parker is one of the few people in the league better at getting to the hoop!

by Doors Open on Jun 21, 2011 7:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Crazy?

I’d do this in a heartbeat, as a matter of fact, let’s do it now!!!!!!!!!

"I'm bleeding purple!"

by jackofspadez on Jun 21, 2011 7:22 PM PDT reply actions  

I hope this isn't fluff.

Getting Tony Parker for the 7th pick would be incredible.

Children, before you go to sleep check under your bed for the BOOGIE MAN!!

by kingme18 on Jun 21, 2011 7:22 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

dont salaries have to "match" up?

I would think Beno or Caspi would have to be a part of this…

by Ryan J on Jun 21, 2011 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

No

We are well under the cap so the salaries are not an issue.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Somebody has to ask every F**KING time! Lol.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 21, 2011 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nope

Plenty of cap space

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yipes otis (threadjack)

The first 8 Twins have reached base against Bumgarner. 6-0, still no outs.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

OH GAWD

I haven’t even switched it on. Been watching Phineas & Ferb with my daughter.

So what are the odds the Giants score six runs in this entire series, much less tonight?

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

He just got the hook

10 batters (he struck Pavano out), 1/3 inning, 8 runs, Twins still batting with one out and a runner on 2nd. Time for a big helping of Guillermo Mota. Eep.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

We need rain.

A lot of rain.

"He forced it to go in the net, and that's a good thing." -Jerry Reynolds

by Juan Primo on Jun 21, 2011 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or a dam to break

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can we just fold?

I’d hate to waste any runs on tonight’s game.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's like the summer of '99 all over again...

couple nice moves, young players developing, and a free agent signing… viola!

contender…

by Ryan J on Jun 21, 2011 7:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Tony Parker would be Webber.

He’d cry like hell about being traded to Sacramento. I’m not sure Parker’s father would talk him off the ledge, though.

"He forced it to go in the net, and that's a good thing." -Jerry Reynolds

by Juan Primo on Jun 21, 2011 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

What in Parker's background leads you to this assumption?

He’s played his entire NBA career in a small market and hasn’t barked about it once to my knowledge.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

If we're talking about reenacting the '99 scenario...

…who else would Parker be? Vlade? Nope—Vlade chose to sign with Sacramento.

Looking only at how SA and Sac are both small markets is misleading. SA had a contender in place by the time Parker was drafted. He was basically born on third base. Getting traded to Sacramento would put him in the on-deck circle.

"He forced it to go in the net, and that's a good thing." -Jerry Reynolds

by Juan Primo on Jun 21, 2011 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

So in other words this is pure conjecture

There is nothing anywhere that shows this guys as a prima donna or as a player that would “cry like hell.”

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wonder if he's on board with this

Hard to believe San Antonio would be shopping him so openly without both player and team in agreement.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 7:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry - didn't mean to come off sounding so douchey

I was just looking for confirmation that he had shown signs of being a malcontent, as that had never come across my radar. Webber, on the other hand, had quite the history before he ever set foot in Sacramento.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 7:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nah, it wasn't douchey.

And, yes, it is conjecture. I had thought I made that pretty obvious. (Fail.) I neglected to preface “he’d cry like hell” with “I think” because I wanted to garnish the conjecture with hyperbole.

Drawing parallels with our 1999 team is an ultimately pointless endeavor; my larger point was simply that it would be difficult for even the most consummate professional to cope with being traded from a perennial contender (and the only NBA franchise team he’s ever known) to a perennial lottery team.

I would not say that Parker is a malcontent at all, but let’s be honest—he hasn’t had much to gripe about in his career. He’s known nothing but stability (e.g. same coach, same system, and the same core of great players).

I would probably pull the trigger on a Parker trade, but I’d still very much worry about where his head is at. The fact that Parker has not demonstrated a history of complaining about his remarkably stable situation in the NBA offers me little comfort, to be honest. Maybe I’m just a worrier…

"He forced it to go in the net, and that's a good thing." -Jerry Reynolds

by Juan Primo on Jun 21, 2011 8:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

My biggest concern

would be seeing if his head exploded under Westphal after a career of being coached by Pop.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I gues the only difference is

That in San Antonio, you’re playing for the playoffs and winning the title. In Sacramento, the ambitions are not the same. I’m sure with a few shrewd moves, the Kings can become a playoff team sooner rather than later.

I don’t know if it’s just me but I’m ready to see the Kings make trades that make a big impact in the standings and not mainly for financial purposes.

Children, before you go to sleep check under your bed for the BOOGIE MAN!!

by kingme18 on Jun 21, 2011 8:15 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

true, but he also won multiple championships in that small market with a league-wide respect for professionalism. It seems hard to believe that he would be on board middling around with a long ways to go re-building small market team. Im not saying he is a prima donna at all, but I don’t see it being a happy move for him. he has already proven himself and I bet he wants to be challenging for rings asap. but who knows…

by gaindeyouth on Jun 21, 2011 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Asked and answered
with a league-wide respect for professionalism.

High character guy. I don’t see anything on his resumé that says he causes problems or pouts.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don't tease me bro.

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Jun 21, 2011 7:23 PM PDT reply actions   3 recs

Even though the voices aren't real, they have some pretty good ideas!

by LeaguePassAddict on Jun 21, 2011 7:32 PM PDT reply actions  

Brent Barry...

…thinks this a great move…

by Ryan J on Jun 21, 2011 7:41 PM PDT reply actions  

At first I was all hell yea

but then I looked at 10 years 700+ games and he is a scorer not a shooter. 73% lifetime for FTs. If he loses a step and can’t get to the basket his value will drop quickly.
Take away the draft pick and 13000 of cap space and all of a sudden doubts crept in.
I am currently leaning no.

I would like to thank all of you for the outpouring of support during my time of need. I proudly, and with great relief, announce that my C is now working on my laptop and any errors from now on are due to my inabilty to proofread. I use to proofread my stuff, but it began lowering my self esteem,
I have found it hard to sound intelligent if I think while I key. So in summary ; the worse the keying the smarter my comment. The proceeds from the HereWeFixTheC car wash have been forwarded to HereWeBuild . Thanks.

by ElRonToro on Jun 21, 2011 7:50 PM PDT reply actions  

My thoughts exactly..

Yes, it would instantly improve the team. My problem is I think when players like Reke, Cousins and Thornton start playing on his level he might be a too aged and we’ll be stuck looking for a replacement pg

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 9:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cross that bridge when it comes.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 21, 2011 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

A 3 guard lineup.

Tony, Marcus, and Reke on the floor at the same time would be compelling and would be problematic for the opposition. Toss in Cousins and Sammy anchoring the post…good times coming again??

by adamsite on Jun 21, 2011 7:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Not only would this be a massive talent upgrade

But Tony Parker is a recognized name with championship experience…a name that could help put fans in the seats, generate more excitement, and help the team stay in Sac (at least IMHO).

Plus, veteran, fills additional ball handler role, gets to the FT line (something we could use more of)….don’t seem much downside.

by sactoreg on Jun 21, 2011 7:56 PM PDT reply actions  

MAKE IT HAPPEN!!

I would love to see Tony Parker in a Kings uniform. I say the #7 with Omri and Jeter for Parker. If I recall the Spurs did like Omri also I think.

by mrbaka on Jun 21, 2011 7:57 PM PDT reply actions  

hell yea

tony fuckin parker now were talkin

by I HATE GRANT NAPEAR on Jun 21, 2011 8:08 PM PDT reply actions  

Maybe he will sleep with Peaches wife and make KHTK more interesting

Any time a perennial title contender can trade their 29 year old point guard for a lottery pick you got to do it … oh wait this isn’t Pounding The Rock.

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 8:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Those guys at Rock don't seem to upset with this

they are focusing on 5 more than 7 but are willing to make the deal to shed salary

I would like to thank all of you for the outpouring of support during my time of need. I proudly, and with great relief, announce that my C is now working on my laptop and any errors from now on are due to my inabilty to proofread. I use to proofread my stuff, but it began lowering my self esteem,
I have found it hard to sound intelligent if I think while I key. So in summary ; the worse the keying the smarter my comment. The proceeds from the HereWeFixTheC car wash have been forwarded to HereWeBuild . Thanks.

by ElRonToro on Jun 21, 2011 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep

The Spurs are at around $75m, and that’s with only half a roster.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

rather have them draft Jimmer or Kemba than go for Parker such a stupid idea

by NastyNas on Jun 21, 2011 8:17 PM PDT reply actions  

He said it was stupid....pay attention

I would like to thank all of you for the outpouring of support during my time of need. I proudly, and with great relief, announce that my C is now working on my laptop and any errors from now on are due to my inabilty to proofread. I use to proofread my stuff, but it began lowering my self esteem,
I have found it hard to sound intelligent if I think while I key. So in summary ; the worse the keying the smarter my comment. The proceeds from the HereWeFixTheC car wash have been forwarded to HereWeBuild . Thanks.

by ElRonToro on Jun 21, 2011 8:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

They arent going to be a championship team with Parker this year or next year so whats the point of it, might as well get more young guns and Andrew Gouedlock is basically a poor mans Stephen Curry who will be there at 35 lol

by NastyNas on Jun 21, 2011 8:20 PM PDT reply actions  

Free Agents

How much money would we still have for Sammy and a FA? Is it feasible to still sign a restricted FA away from another team or Battier? I ’m still on the Battier bandwagon this offseason.

by BobTheAutomator on Jun 21, 2011 8:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Good argument, if the Spurs were offering 29 year old Tim Duncan

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah -

A three-time all star and finals MVP is really beneath our standards.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

But what has he done since Eva left?

I would like to thank all of you for the outpouring of support during my time of need. I proudly, and with great relief, announce that my C is now working on my laptop and any errors from now on are due to my inabilty to proofread. I use to proofread my stuff, but it began lowering my self esteem,
I have found it hard to sound intelligent if I think while I key. So in summary ; the worse the keying the smarter my comment. The proceeds from the HereWeFixTheC car wash have been forwarded to HereWeBuild . Thanks.

by ElRonToro on Jun 21, 2011 8:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Cried?

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Same thing as every other guy not married to Eva Longoria...

"Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"

by Schneezel on Jun 21, 2011 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

...like hell.

"He forced it to go in the net, and that's a good thing." -Jerry Reynolds

by Juan Primo on Jun 21, 2011 9:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Got some?

"Live Long and Prosper." - Spock

by hozr on Jun 22, 2011 5:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Huge Salary. 29 years old.

Tons of miles on him. For the 7th pick? Pass. Only Smills gets it.

Parker is pretty ball dominant player and would take ball out of Reke’s hands too. Giving away the 7th pick you are foregoing your opportunity to draft a potential star on a rookie contract and committing money that could be used to land FA or other trade.

I don’t like it. Parker’s game is predicated on quickness and he is approaching the age he is going to lose half of a step.

Now if they want to trade Tony Parker for JT and Beno (or Garcia and Greene, take your pick), then we have a deal.

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Jun 21, 2011 8:29 PM PDT reply actions  

As a bad team, I think we over-value this draft way too much.

"Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"

by Schneezel on Jun 21, 2011 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

This draft is a joke. 3-4 years of Tony Parker is MUCH better than anything we can get at #7. Do the deal.

by Travis Mays Hayes on Jun 21, 2011 11:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

$12.5m x 3 years = huge salary?

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

12.5 X 2 years with a cheap third year buyout if it doesn't work out

Crap, he makes the same per year as Kevin Martin.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, he makes $12.5 x 3,

and $12.5 or a $3.5 buyout in year 4.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep, thanks for the correction

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

And

If the Spurs cannot dump Parker now his price will only go down.

I don’t even trust Parker to buy into this team. If the Kings were a contender I wouldn’t have a problem. He may take a look around and demand out because it will be years before he is competing for another title in Sacramento.

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I love this thought process

We need great players, but not players from great teams because they will not “buy in.” In other words, we can’t pursue winners because they will not be happy here?

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just the reality its hard convincing older players to stay on a young, building team while their career is coming to a close.

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Huge salary? On what planet?

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

NO

I don’t see how this really helps us in the long run. If we were a playoff team that needed that veteran player with championship experience to get us over the top, then I would be all for it. But, as we all know, we’re just trying to win more games and hopefully fight for that last playoff spot.

Parker does NOT make us an instant contender. No way in hell. He was basically outplayed by Mike Conley in the Memphis series. He is a slashing scorer who occasionally gets some assists. As mentioned above, his game will probably not age well. If this is what everyone thinks we need, then lets just draft Kemba Walker, who is about 8 years younger and much cheaper.

by CrimeD on Jun 21, 2011 8:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Wouldn’t a veteran presence help you “win more games”? I get your point, but if he’s the best available player we can get, why not get em? Also, he will help improve the team and help each players growth. A rookie will be a rookie. But if these players accelerate at a faster rate with a vet, the team will be better off in the future as a whole.

by Cold12 on Jun 21, 2011 8:39 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Kurt Rambis and Danny Ainge didn’t help the Kings turn the corner in the 80s.

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 8:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

No, but Vlade Divac did

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Gonna let you flush out that Tony Parker vs Vlade Divac comparison a little more.

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Vlade was a vet with a pedigree when he came here

And a much more appropriate comparison to Parker as an upper echelon core rotation player. Rambis had turned the corner on his career, and this was just a weigh station for Ainge.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes

We would win more games. But I doubt it would be enough to even make the playoffs next year. Then, the year after, we’re looking at a 30/31 year old Parker who is most likely on the downside of his career. I don’t see a Jason Kidd-like career ending for Parker.

by CrimeD on Jun 21, 2011 8:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

4 years younger than Jason Terry

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

4 years younger than Dirk

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

4 years younger than Shawn Marion

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's not that Parker is old,

it’s that our team is so goddamn young.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

He doesn't compare to any of those guys

Terry and Dirk are both shooters, and Marion is an athletic freak.

by CrimeD on Jun 21, 2011 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

And Parker is 4 years younger than all of them

He-is-not-old. We-are-young.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

The peanut gallery wants perfection not reality

A brief comparison between Mormonism and Historic Christianity
http://carm.org/comparison-between-christian-doctrine-and-mormon-doctrine

A former atheist's (me) appeal: Creation Science
http://creation.com/creation-answers

by sac_faithful on Jun 21, 2011 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, well remember how bad that 29 y/o Vlade was

for the young Kings team in ’99. Horrible mistake. We should have spent our cap space on a young buck like Ike Austin or Michael “Yogi” Stewart instead.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 9:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Remember Ike Austin too

I was very happy we had Petrie that season.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yogi was awesome though!! Haha

He was damn entertaining…

And not close to competing??
we made the playoffs that year

regardless, we both agree. His point is not valid

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Drafted Jason Williams

Traded for Chris Webber, Signed Vlade Divac….

Ya, I’d say they were ready to start competing when they signed him

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'll tell you what then

Let’s go kidnap Petrie, force him to make the trade and then see what else he does (and hope he does not call the cops) and see if he signs and trades anybody and then let’s wait a season, see what all happens and see how it works then we get our hands on a time machine and come back to today and we can talk about how the Kings with Tony Parker in 2010-2011 were either not ready to compete or ready to compete.

Pretty darn sure I remember stuck watching a crappy grainy VHS tape of JWill and Peja highlights that summer and nobody having a clue how good they were going to be nor whether Webber was going to implode, nor who was going to start at shooting guard given Wahad couldn’t shoot, nor whether we were going to be able to resign Corliss of whether he woudl fit playing more at SF, nor who the heck was going to come off the bench (Oliver Miller: The original Desmond Mason).

But I tell you what, we’ll get that time machine so we can do this proper.

by wallywagon11 on Jun 21, 2011 11:05 PM PDT up reply actions   3 recs

I remember that video

I was between my junior and senior year. I remember one of my best friends got a copy and we watched it obsessively.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

which netted us a 3-2 first round loss to the Jazz

Which we followed it up by a 44-38, first round loss to the Lakers

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 10:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Which we followed with our

7 game series to the Lakers in ‘02. That’s all progress right?

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 10:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

At some point

Someone has to argue how Tony Parker is so much like Vlade Divac for this analogy to hold any validity.

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

To you, HL, and BN

I agree. Not 100% the same.

However, when we signed Vlade, people said he was too old and had bad knees. Plus he had a rep for chain smoking. Parker may have 3 great years and 2 good years left. I know big guards who can shoot, last longer than small guards. But training and medicine are improving. Players are playing longer.

Second, Vlade helped a young, combustible team with chemistry. His contributions as a leader helped every bit as much, if not more, than his contributions on the court. Williams was an oddity and Webber was taking a wait and see attitude about staying in Sac. If our team fell apart in ’99 – The Team may have never existed. Parker can serve a similar role now.

That team’s core was not much older than this one. Webber was 25. That was a big difference. However, Peja, Williams, Wahad and eventually Polard were young. Petrie off-set that by signing Barry and Maxwell to help as well.

So the situation is not exact. However, the influence of a dedicated player with leadership skill to help direct a young team and get them winning is similar.

The difference between a 27 and 37+ win season this year will mean a lot for our momentum and future

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I struggle to see how Parker will become the glue locker room guy on or off the court but alright sure why not

I would hate to see us not win 37 games though and part with a draft pick for a guy who will likely only be here for three years. I know we can’t wait forever and certaintly not a horrid idea but just don’t see it being anything close to the sitaution like when we signed Vlade.

by wallywagon11 on Jun 21, 2011 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I respect your opinion as always WW

I will say I would struggle much more with this in a normal draft.

I just think this is a very mediocre draft. And I think we might be lucky to get a high end backup from the player we draft. Who may or may not stay with this team after his rookie contract.

Or we can get a veteran who has won 3 championships, is a three time all star and is a PG who can mentor Reke and help run our offense.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 11:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

We should keep getting younger

Maybe we’ll get in the NCAA tournament next season.

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions   4 recs

Apples and elephants

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

How many other teams have been able to build through the draft quite like them?

by Josh L on Jun 21, 2011 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

As a Kings fan I'm tired of hearing about the long run .

We say this year after year and we finally have the chance to get a 3x NBA champion with veteran experience . Parker helps our team NOW and gives us a HUGE talent upgrade . We still will have money to spend on a quality free-agent or two and Parker is a great start to a potential turnaround RIGHT NOW .

by Mrchristopher10 on Jun 21, 2011 8:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Do you think...

the Maloofs are going to pay Parker $12 million * 3 years, relinquish the cap-friendly rookie pay scale, and also go out and sign or trade for high-priced quality talent (or two)?

Doubt they want to go on spending spree when they effectively just lost the Palms.

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Jun 21, 2011 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

So it's not a good deal because the Maloofs don't think so?

Okie dokie.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don’t doubt the Maloofs and their decision making!

by Josh L on Jun 21, 2011 9:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Anybody think Parker would help sell tickets and get an arena deal done?

Come on they would do it in a heartbeat.

A brief comparison between Mormonism and Historic Christianity
http://carm.org/comparison-between-christian-doctrine-and-mormon-doctrine

A former atheist's (me) appeal: Creation Science
http://creation.com/creation-answers

by sac_faithful on Jun 21, 2011 9:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why do we think that we're going to get a star in this draft?

People always try to be optimistic, but seriously? In great drafts, they’re busts in the top 5 even. What we have here is a chance to take a player who has been a significant contributor on a championship team, and all we have to give up is the basically the worst possible pick we could’ve gotten in the worst draft we have ever seen. As for the other player who may have to be included? Very few players are not expendable when you win 25 games out of 82 outings.

The only thing that bothers me is that Parker’s already pretty sizable contract gets bigger with a trade-kicker in place.

"Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"

by Schneezel on Jun 21, 2011 8:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Let's get this deal done!!!

Next SF position, then Center if Dally goes!!! Welcome Back Hassan!!

by KINGKENJI on Jun 21, 2011 8:47 PM PDT reply actions  

I remember all the naysayers here with the Stoudamire rumors

Why are we so afraid of talent?

"Grant is a genius." - section214 - 5/17/11

by otis29 on Jun 21, 2011 8:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Chris Webber and Shareef Abdul Raheem

Almost as if Kings fans remembered recent PFs with knee issues

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 9:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

it was his eye at the time that people were scared of

was supposed to lose like 20% of his vision.

A brief comparison between Mormonism and Historic Christianity
http://carm.org/comparison-between-christian-doctrine-and-mormon-doctrine

A former atheist's (me) appeal: Creation Science
http://creation.com/creation-answers

by sac_faithful on Jun 21, 2011 9:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

To me

Stoudemire is a head case. And while I joke about not wanting Tony Parker I’d love to have him. He’s a great player and a fucking winner

"What the fuck did I do?" - McNulty

by vfettke on Jun 21, 2011 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why only Sac and Toronto interested?

Can’t believe all the nay sayers. Give SA whatever they want. #7 and any bench player other than thornton and JT. Oh and 29 is prime not old. 29 is when your physical and mental skills come together. After 29 mental skills increase and physical starts tailing off. Pull the trigger.

by 13uppercut on Jun 21, 2011 8:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Usually agree

But not always the case. I remember the core of Bibby, Peja and Miller were all suppose to be entering the prime of their careers and thus carry the Kings. It feel apart without Webber.

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 9:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Celtics, Spurs, Mavs all have way older players

not every 30 year old comes up lame.

A brief comparison between Mormonism and Historic Christianity
http://carm.org/comparison-between-christian-doctrine-and-mormon-doctrine

A former atheist's (me) appeal: Creation Science
http://creation.com/creation-answers

by sac_faithful on Jun 21, 2011 9:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

29 years is not old

But Parker relies on quickness to turn the corner on defenders and get into seams on fast break. So a player of his style of play, 29 years is definitely approaching old. He may have 2 to 3 years left, or less, before steep decline.

I will say in his favor I don’t think he ever sustained serious injury. But when he loses a half of a step, and it will happen, he’s not going to be the same player. Thats the risk, and thats why I don’t do it.

If the Kings think they can draft a potential star at #7, they have to keep the pick. If they are willing to trade away the pick, then they really must not be all that high on the candidates they auditioned. And I don’t think thats the case. I think they like at least 2 players (Jimmer, Burks) quite a bit.

"The Spurs subliment their statistics for the good of the team" Kings Coach PW.

by bench_blob on Jun 21, 2011 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Would have to agree

It’s like Parker is going to fall apart or blow his knee any moment, it’s just that guards who play like him tend to fall off a little early. He could be abnormal and succeed with a mid range shot I guess but I wouldn’t bet on it. Sure seems like a 3 year stop gap. A good one mind you but not interested in dealing a lotto pick for a stop gap even if it’s a weak draft.

by wallywagon11 on Jun 21, 2011 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not to mention

3 years of elite Parker might do more wonders for this franchise than 10 years of 6th man Draft Pick X.

If he can take pressure off of Reke and help teach him some of the PG skills he learned. Help keep Cousins in line and happy. Help our team win games, which will attract more talent and help team chemistry. Than even if he starts falling off quickly after 32, it will be a win.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 9:27 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed with
If the Kings think they can draft a potential star at #7, they have to keep the pick. If they are willing to trade away the pick, then they really must not be all that high on the candidates they auditioned.

Not so sure about

And I don’t think thats the case. I think they like at least 2 players (Jimmer, Burks) quite a bit.
I don’t like either of those guys more than Parker. But then again, I don’t get to vote.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

This is where we trust Petrie

Blob’s first quote you highlighted is spot on. If Petrie thinks Burks or Jimmer can be a long term solution for our team. Maybe not an all star, but something close, than you keep the pick.

If he’s unsure they can even be high end backups. You take Parker and run.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Parker

The Spurs ran pretty hard last year. Pop let them push the offense at a faster pace and Parker had a pretty fine year and excelled in the faster system. The Kings would go to the HNL with Parker.

I screwed up. There is no other way to say it... - Ailene Voisin

by Bambooozled on Jun 21, 2011 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think it all depends on Tyreke's progression .

If Reke is the player we all hope he is I think he can make that LEAP in his 3rd year to maybe be a borderline all-star . Parker could is a great mentor for him too .

by Mrchristopher10 on Jun 21, 2011 8:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Has anyone ever thought of the possiblilty

that maybe with Tony Parker we could maybe attract better free agents ?

by Mrchristopher10 on Jun 21, 2011 9:04 PM PDT reply actions  

I like Parker

But if that was our goal, Josh Smith and Iggy would be better targets.

"Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"

by Schneezel on Jun 21, 2011 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed

But if Iggy and Smith are unavailable to us, Parker is a nice alternative.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

here's the conundrum

who will be the best player in 2-3 years, Parker or whoever we take at #7?

the salary reqs and the experience somewhat offset each other imho (though it’s hard to beat a proven winner, swag is swag) so we’d be paying for a veteran nba all-star to lead our team.

I say do it. Give up the pick and nothing consequential (Jeter but not Omri).

時國王驕奢,不遵典憲。 《後漢書》

by sj60615 on Jun 21, 2011 9:09 PM PDT reply actions  

This

Well said

"I know everything there is to know about the greatest game ever invented." -Shooter, aka Dennis Hopper, Hoosiers.

by Rory Sparrow on Jun 21, 2011 10:33 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

2011 - 10 = 2001

Pretty sure we were decent somewhere in there…

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

hey man

he’s not THAT old!

時國王驕奢,不遵典憲。 《後漢書》

by sj60615 on Jun 21, 2011 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

When the vast majority of people here have been speculating if we’ll even get a starter out of this draft, and yet when we’re in the mix for a finals MVP we shy away?

"Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"

by Schneezel on Jun 21, 2011 9:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agree

Or to rephrase. If you are Petrie and won’t do this trade, you better have a lot of faith that the player you draft and the player you sign with the cap space will outproduce Parker.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 9:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

SOMEBODY CHECK HIS I.D.!!

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 12:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Speaking of which

Playing with a guy like Ginobili (successfully) is just another plus for Parker. Ginobili has a very similar Usage rate to Tyreke Evans. Parker has shown he can work with that type of player (a two guard who handles the ball for long periods of time).

Author of the Pick and Scroll and NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Jun 21, 2011 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I signed in JUST to REC this

I would make this trade over and over. The question is, once you have TP:

Do you trade Beno or do you trade Garcia? Both?

BRING BACK THE ARCO THUNDER....STOMP!

by kfipp on Jun 21, 2011 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd say Beno

Cisco could be backup SG and he’s a leader the rest of the team loves.

Author of the Pick and Scroll and NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Jun 21, 2011 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

And he's the current starting small forward

Not that I’m in love with that idea.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wouldn't you guys get the sense

that several more moves would follow a move like this (if it were to go down)?

BRING BACK THE ARCO THUNDER....STOMP!

by kfipp on Jun 21, 2011 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would certainly hope so

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

And, he can sit our younger guys on his knee

…and tell them about walking to school in the snow uphill both ways

by sactoreg on Jun 22, 2011 6:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hate the idea of giving up our pick, but...

Career averages;
MPG FG% 3P% FT% APG PPG
33.0 .493 .315 .732 5.7 16.7

I’d be pretty damn happy with this for a few years, thank you!

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 9:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Veteran leadership

Parker can play, but can he change our dysfunctional culture? Can we package him with the Spurs coaching staff?

by sonomanate on Jun 21, 2011 9:20 PM PDT reply actions  

I think he would command respect

He’s won 3 championships and has been an all star 3 times. The other players should respect and value that. If he can’t help change the team culture, than the organization has issues much deeper than any player we draft or trade for would be able to correct.

Just keep him away from the section with the player’s wives.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

EXACTLY

Can we trade PW for Popovich? Maybe if we throw in next year’s draft pick as well? Would be a nice salary dump for SA…

時國王驕奢,不遵典憲。 《後漢書》

by sj60615 on Jun 21, 2011 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

rec'd

spot on

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Have the Kings ever traded with SA?

Seems to me SA has always been a solid organization. My only concern would be; What do they know that we don’t when it pertains to this draft, AND; Will TP still have the same fire and commitment if he is playing for a rebuilding team. Otherwise, seems like a good addition for the Kings.

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 9:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Who did we get back Wally?

Thanks!

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

At the time this was a great trade

as we had a frontcourt rotation of Divac, Webber, Miller, which is pretty darn good.

Author of the Pick and Scroll and NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Jun 21, 2011 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's right, thanks

That’s where I had missed the connection. I couldn’t recall an actual deal where we dealt with SA straight up. I love how the Spurs operate, yet it does raise a level of distrust for some reason… I

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 9:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Disagree

Parker will be solid for years. PG’s adjust their game. He’s a pro and will do what it takes to make his club better.

by 13uppercut on Jun 21, 2011 9:26 PM PDT reply actions  

Especially in late game situations where the team struggled .

I trust Tony Parker with the ball in his hands in the clutch more than any player on our team now . WAY MORE .

by Mrchristopher10 on Jun 21, 2011 9:28 PM PDT reply actions  

No

I want nothing to do with any player who would cheat on Eva Longoria

"What the fuck did I do?" - McNulty

by vfettke on Jun 21, 2011 9:30 PM PDT reply actions  

If the Kings trade for Parker

Does that make Thornton expendable? Or would he be a part of that deal?

Ssory Doc, I'm on the Twitters

by 49er16 on Jun 21, 2011 9:37 PM PDT reply actions  

That's right

Thornton is a restricted free agent.

Ssory Doc, I'm on the Twitters

by 49er16 on Jun 21, 2011 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

That being said

For all his awesomeness, if he could be traded, I’d consider dealing him to San Antonio for Tony Parker.

Author of the Pick and Scroll and NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Jun 21, 2011 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

So who would be a part of that deal?

Beno and possibly JT? Beno and draft picks? Or just picks?

Ssory Doc, I'm on the Twitters

by 49er16 on Jun 21, 2011 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd consider looking at the Bulls, who need a backup PG

and trading for C.J. Watson or something, who is more of an undersized SG.

Author of the Pick and Scroll and NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Jun 21, 2011 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

FWIW, the last thing on Earth the Spurs need is a scoring 2-guard.

Time to build a new dynasty from the ashes of the old one.

by Tim C. on Jun 21, 2011 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

What do the Spurs really need?

Ssory Doc, I'm on the Twitters

by 49er16 on Jun 21, 2011 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Big men. Lots of folks at PtR like Thompson.

Time to build a new dynasty from the ashes of the old one.

by Tim C. on Jun 21, 2011 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

NO CAN HAVE.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'd do that.

Even though the voices aren't real, they have some pretty good ideas!

by LeaguePassAddict on Jun 22, 2011 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Curious

If there would be any animosity towards Parker, seeing how he had the affair with his team mate, (Brent Barry’s), Wife.
Trust is a huge factor when it comes to building a team, and I would be curious to know how his image is viewed by the rest of the leagues players.

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 9:41 PM PDT reply actions  

Who on the Kings is even married??

Serious question, because I can’t think of one off the top of my head

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Moot point

I would assume screwing a team mates girlfriend would still be frowned upon by his teammates! I mean, it just raises serious issues of trust, IMO.

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe he was just confused...

They do look a bit similar!

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 9:49 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Yeah...

I’m sorry, but I’d totally fuck Brent Barry’s, too.

If she’s a ho, she’s a ho…and it’s either gonna be you or some other dude.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not a likable person or player.

Popovich’s system made the best out of him. He is kind of overrated and never was a really good play maker. Plus he’s one more player without range. So, unless we give him a place in the front office where he can tell us ALL POP’S PLAYS AND ORGANIZATIONAL RULES OF THE SPURS, I don’t want him.

Bleeding Black and Purple 6710 miles South East of Sacramento.

by ZenBaller on Jun 21, 2011 9:57 PM PDT reply actions  

Excellent Summary

Exactly the point I’ve been failing to make in 20+ comments.

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

So using this thought process,

Stockton and Malone are not hall of famers – they owe it all to Jerry Sloan.

Three time all star. Finals MVP. Kid’s got something under the hood.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

We're talking about a specific player on a specific team.

Generalizing it to all championship teams of the past 70 years doesn’t make much sense.

Bleeding Black and Purple 6710 miles South East of Sacramento.

by ZenBaller on Jun 21, 2011 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not seeing how that was a generalization

But OK. If what you said was true, then wouldn’t the same hold true for Duncan and Ginobli? Your take is that Pop is the three time all star and finals MVP, but he gifted it to Parker. I disagree.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

We're talking about Parker here, there is no need to compare him to other players

to make sense. He was the “worse” of the trio but that’s not that important to the Kings. He’s a good player, a proven player and he’s still in an age to be considered both a veteran and young enough to still have 3-4 years of basketball at a high level. But I feel he’s the exact opposite of what the Kings need both as a character and as a player.

Bleeding Black and Purple 6710 miles South East of Sacramento.

by ZenBaller on Jun 21, 2011 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

how is he opposite.

he’s one of the 5 best pg’s in the league, and a multiple time all star, and a finals mvp, yeah your right who would want him.

by sacman on Jun 21, 2011 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

No problem if you think he's the wrong fit

But the “worse” player made the all star team three times and was a finals MVP. He may be the worst of that trio, but he would be the best player on the Kings today.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes that's true

He would be the best player right now even though I believe Tyreke and DMC are more talented with a higher ceiling.

I just can’t see Parker as an inspiring leader both on and off the court. And you know how difficult things become when you get a player with a heavy contract who’s not a good fit after all.

Bleeding Black and Purple 6710 miles South East of Sacramento.

by ZenBaller on Jun 21, 2011 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, I don't think his contract is all that heavy

3 years at $12.5m per and a 4th year team option with a $3.5m buyout. And we’re just going to have to disagree on this one, because I think he fits the current situation like a glove.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess time will tell who knows?

The weird thing is that if the rumour is right, the Spurs won’t to give up the only “young” player of the trio for a not-that-high pick in a shallow draft.

Bleeding Black and Purple 6710 miles South East of Sacramento.

by ZenBaller on Jun 21, 2011 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

won't=want

Bleeding Black and Purple 6710 miles South East of Sacramento.

by ZenBaller on Jun 21, 2011 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Except

they have George Hill waiting in the wings, which makes Parker the most expendable.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

So lets just take Jimmer or Kemba

That will put the Kings over the top

by Josh L on Jun 21, 2011 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Lol

I sense some sarcasm here

"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken

by thelettere on Jun 22, 2011 2:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

I kind of disagree

Don’t get me wrong, I’d love if the Kings modeled the front office after the Spurs. But, Parker a speedy scoring point guard, which isn’t something that would normally fit Pop’s slower style. Together, they made it work.

"What the fuck did I do?" - McNulty

by vfettke on Jun 21, 2011 11:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

If this trade does go through

Which I hope it does , Tyreke is really going to have to learn how to play without the ball this summer for this to work . Everything depends on Tyreke’s progression basically if this team wants to take that leap or not .

by Mrchristopher10 on Jun 21, 2011 9:59 PM PDT reply actions  

Yes Cousins too .

I only hope Tyreke & Demarcus can balance their egos for the good of the team . Parker could definitely help with the mental aspect of being a team player and WINNER in this league for both Reke & Cuz .

by Mrchristopher10 on Jun 21, 2011 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

parker does hit that midrange jumper beno likes pretty consistently

he would definitely be a better floor general for us. and tyreke did fine with beno at the point

by D00M on Jun 21, 2011 11:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

thats why i don't think this will go down.

reke and parker wouldn’t work well in my opinion. Now parkere and Thornton would I believe.

by sacman on Jun 21, 2011 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

What makes you think that?

Parker worked well with the high usage Manu. I understand that Ginobli is a far superior deep shooter than Tyreke, but if we’re talking about co-existing, I don’t see the big deal.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Don't know

In my opinion they are just to similiar. I don’t see them working well together. Manu is a 6th man. He comes in the game and attacks. Far better shooter also. I just think when you have a solid point guard that he should be paired more with a shooter. Just my opinion. but thats probably why I’m not a gm.

by sacman on Jun 21, 2011 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

but I would love to find out.

I want to see what tyreke has this season when healthy. I really hope he works on his game.

by sacman on Jun 21, 2011 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

"Parker could definitely help with the mental aspect of being a team player"

Such as;
It ain’t no fun, if the homies can’t have none!

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 10:09 PM PDT reply actions  

Damnit!

Reply fail.

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I really hope the Kings do not draft Leonard if they don’t make this trade go through.

by Josh L on Jun 21, 2011 10:14 PM PDT reply actions  

"Veteran Leadership"

The Thunder made it to the Western Conference Finals on young talent and “timely” veteran additions. They had already been to the playoffs once before signing their key veteran player (Kendrick Perkins). We won 24 games last year. I’d compare our draft this year to when the Thunder picked up Harden. Let our young guys get their feet wet and allow further evaluation. I’d be fine with a player in the 26-27 year old range but this just doesn’t seem like a beneficial trade for us in the long run. Doubt Petrie pulls the trigger

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 10:15 PM PDT reply actions  

We've heard the trade rumor

Doesn’t that mean it won’t happen?

sd377 wants to ban me for unleashing the Kaepernick Supernova Gamma Ray

by bignerd on Jun 21, 2011 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Theres a huge difference

The Kings don’t have Kevin Durant. Or even a player on par with Westbrook.

by Josh L on Jun 21, 2011 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

But we're in the earlier stages of the rebuilding process

Durant’s first season they won 20 games; second season 23 games. It’s not like he was great right away.

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Durant averaged 25 points in his 2nd year in the league

You’re basically saying that Evans+Cousins= Durant+ Westbrook and that Jimmer/Kemba/Leonard= Harden. I’m sorry but you’re being a little bit too optimistic here.

by Josh L on Jun 21, 2011 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Not much better than Reke's 20/5/5 IMO in his rookie year

Throw in Thornton and Walker and project a couple more years, I think our young talent will hold our own

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 10:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tell me, did Tyreke improve in any way in his 2nd year in the league?

by Josh L on Jun 21, 2011 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

Comparing Evans to Durant is just not fair.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's fair

But i don’t see him elevating his game to reach Durant’s level. Call me crazy.

by Josh L on Jun 21, 2011 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not comparing him to Durant

They’re different players. I’m comparing our collective young talent to theirs. It’s hard to assess accurately because we’re a couple years behind in our development. But I think we’re underestimating how good Reke and Cuz will be in this league

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

I just don’t see the harm in adding Parker to add to that talent

by Josh L on Jun 21, 2011 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Agreed

Parker would expedite their growth, not retard it.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

This

These kind of vets help. Especially since Reke is trying to learn some of the painful combo guard lessons Parker had to.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 11:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tyreke wasn't healthy his sophmore year

and yes, his outside shooting improved…

I also never saw this in his first year

http://youtu.be/wXd4NgAjDMo

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

nope

his outside shooting did not improve, his shot may have looked better, but his percentages were worse.

by sacman on Jun 21, 2011 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

What is wrong with seeing what he’s got with Parker?

by Josh L on Jun 21, 2011 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tell stats to stop lying then

http://www.hoopdata.com/player.aspx?name=Tyreke%20Evans

2010: 16-23 feet 32% Threes 38.3%
2011: 16-23 feet 33% Threes 43.7%

Damn those made up stats

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 10:59 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

BTW

For anyone wondering why those numbers look so funny.

16-23 feet is a FG%

Three pointers is eFG%

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes

I probably should have used normal 3pt%

2010: 25.5%
2011: 29%

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm saying that we have enough young talent at this point

to be able to make a playoff run without Parker. Assuming we keep the pick and get Walker or Burks and get a couple more role players via second round or free agency/trade. Parker would be a wasted investment in the long run IMO. You think Petrie would pull the trigger on this trade?

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree

We have nowhere near the young talent that OKC possesses. Durant and Westbrook are light years better than our best player. We won’t be drafting a Durant anytime soon, so we have to finish this job another way.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's not so much finishing the job "another way"

But finishing the job “too soon.” If Parker was 26-27 years old I’d say great. But he peaks a little too early IMO. And if he’s not going to be a major contributor for us in the long run, why trade for him? For “veteran leadership?” What could he give our young guys that Beno or Cisco or Dally couldn’t?

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 10:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

He's just a better player than those guys

So I’ll take better player plus veteran leadership over whatever the others offer.

"You can have the knowledge that a tomato is a fruit, but it takes wisdom not to put it in a fruit salad." Jerry Reynolds

by kingsfan300 on Jun 21, 2011 10:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually,

I think he times out perfectly. He becomes the best player on the team right now, and by the time his run is up Evans and Cousins mature into the best players on the team. Parker’s “option” year is the Cousins’ qualifying offer year, so the salaries spin out at the right time. If Parker were 26-27 he would not be as established or as good, and you would have to manage his next contract along with Tyreke and Cousins.

Parker for the #7 makes the Kings better, and the cost is a pick in a piss poor draft. If the choice is Parker or (insert name of your favorite draft pick here), it’s a no brainer for me. Give me the three time all start, the finals MVP, the guy that is still in the prime of his career.

Fun facts – The average age of the 10 Kings currently under contract is 24.4. Adding Parker would change that to 28.8. He is only ancient when compared to our roster. Half of the world champion Dallas Mavericks are older than him.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions   4 recs

I guess we differ mostly in how good we think our pick at 7 will be

I do want to mention that the Thunder have a very low average age as well. I know that we don’t have a Durant or a Westbrook, but I think that we would be doing a disservice to both Reke and DMC to not expect similar success from them. Collectively I think our young nucleus has a chance to be great. I also think Walker/Burks have a chance to be great. Not sure we can really compare the Mavs though. They drafted Nowitzki 13 years ago, which is when they began their rebuilding process. We essentially started when we drafted Reke. They’re at a completely different stage and probably only have one or two more years to make good playoff runs. We should aim to be competitive for the next 10 years.

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 11:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Someone correct me if I'm wrong

But wasn’t the success of the Thunder atypical for such a young team?

"You can have the knowledge that a tomato is a fruit, but it takes wisdom not to put it in a fruit salad." Jerry Reynolds

by kingsfan300 on Jun 21, 2011 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

And make sure that you ask to speak to the 29 year old Zach Randolph

or the 32 year old Shane Battier. Those ancient mariners looked pretty good in the playoffs.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's a good thing they have NEAR the miles Parker does

and play the same position, or else your comment would have almost made sense

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

What did I miss?

Your inference was that Memphis was a young team. And while I agree, much of their success was tied to their veteran players. I must have missed the part of your statement that said that all replies must tie directly to the point guard position.

DIRK!

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Point being that because a 29 year old big man was good for a young team

Does not mean that a 29 year old high miled point guard is good for our team

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

OK,

that was about a million miles away from what you initially posted, but whatever.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess I'm combining two different arguments

Basically at the end of the day Parker would be a short term solution to our problems.

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 11:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Right

And I’m fine with that. In the short term he becomes the best player on this team, which improves greatly upon his arrival. Eventually, Tyreke and Cousins grow into their roles as best players and team leaders. Parker’s contract is up when Cousins is up for extension, by which time Tyreke and Cousins are veteran performers with playoff experience (and hopefully success).

I will take the above scenario over Jimmer/Alec/Kawhi/Kemba/Jan/Jonas….

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

7 straight across, I'm fine with it.

But I’m not sure how set I am with packaging a donte/omri or something like that. Which is what I’m guessing they’d want

Though if they can trade up and draft a SF then that might change

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

I understand your point, but I'm not following your train of thought and how you arrived to this point.

"You can have the knowledge that a tomato is a fruit, but it takes wisdom not to put it in a fruit salad." Jerry Reynolds

by kingsfan300 on Jun 21, 2011 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah

but durant is an mvp type player.

by sacman on Jun 21, 2011 11:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that adding Parker

spurs on the success of Evans and Cousins, no pun intended.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Placing all our opinions aside

Who thinks Petrie actually pulls the trigger on the #7 for Parker? (Although we would probably have to add another piece)

by amack10 on Jun 21, 2011 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Depends on how enamored he is of the prospects

Given how many guys they’ve looked at, I don’t think that they’ve locked onto that “one guy.”

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think if he doesn't, he should maybe be fired.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 12:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

BTW, to go back to the Vlade comparison

When we signed Vlade, the average age of the players on our roster was: 24.1

Our record the previous season: 27-55

Average age our our starting 5: 23.6

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jun 21, 2011 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you have the opportunity

To bring a major talent like Parker to your team without having to trade any major pieces (Reke, Cousins, MT, etc.) you do it. Who at the #7 spot in this draft has the skill set or the experience to match what Parker has done or still can do at his position? Our youth movement phase has pretty much ended. It’s time to bring in skilled veteran players with experience that can contribute to the growth of this team much like Dally did last year.

by sacnativekingsfan on Jun 21, 2011 10:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Webber was 29 when he signed a $127 million, seven-year contract with the Kings

Parker just signed a 4 year extension for 50 Million.

I love what Parker brings but I am not sure I stick him in that same realm as C-Web. Couple that with the infidelity with a teammates Wife and I think I’m gonna have to retract my knee-jerk reaction of “Yes, Please!”.

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 10:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Webber was 29 when he signed a $127 million, seven-year contract with the Kings

Ya… how’d that work out for us….

by HeuristicLineup on Jun 21, 2011 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

$41m guaranteed, not $50m

The 4th year has a $3.5m buyout.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 10:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

agree 10000000%

if they want the #7 for parker, they would be a fool not to do it. he’s still one of the top 3-3 pg’s in the league. Only his durability is a question.

by sacman on Jun 21, 2011 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

i dont know about top 3, but he is top 10

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Jun 21, 2011 10:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

deron williams, chris paul, steve nash, derek rose are the top tier.

i guess he falls in the next group with rondo, westbrook, and wall.

close enough i guess.

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Jun 22, 2011 6:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

recd

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Jun 21, 2011 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yesss

Even if you don’t like Parker or think his value is inflated by Pop’s system – he’s still better than any other option at the #7 spot or any other free agent available. Period.

All else is pipe dreams and yellow-bellied nonsense.

"I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common sense."
-H.L. Mencken

by thelettere on Jun 22, 2011 2:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

If Parker's really a problem

could make it a 3-team with Portland and Batum and their 1st coming here

by LPKingsFan on Jun 21, 2011 10:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Once again, people!

HE CHEATED ON THIS:

I have to question his decision making abilities

"What the fuck did I do?" - McNulty

by vfettke on Jun 21, 2011 11:28 PM PDT reply actions   3 recs

Amen!

"Let's put this negatizm behind us!" - Joe Maloof

by Dirkula on Jun 21, 2011 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Uhhh... What were we talking about?

"Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"

by Schneezel on Jun 21, 2011 11:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

When you eat a steak dinner everynight,

sometimes a bowl of beans looks pretty good.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 12:38 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

getting parker i believe means

we are gonna lose either thornton or sammy d FOR SURE

by sacman on Jun 21, 2011 11:30 PM PDT reply actions  

We would probably have to move Beno to keep both Thornton and Dalembert

But I think that can be done.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 21, 2011 11:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

when Tyreke and Cousins hit 25,Tony would be how old 35? I dont get u peoples

by NastyNas on Jun 21, 2011 11:45 PM PDT reply actions  

I don't like Parker either but his age is perfect for the Kings

An experienced leader at PG with 2-3 good years left him is ideal for Tyreke and DMC. Let’s just hope he’s not Parker.

Bleeding Black and Purple 6710 miles South East of Sacramento.

by ZenBaller on Jun 21, 2011 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Gotta say. Great to be in trade discussions like this.

The asinine trade thread is fun and all, but some backing on these reports that informs the fanbase what kind of deals we’re swinging at is refreshing.

"Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"

by Schneezel on Jun 21, 2011 11:51 PM PDT reply actions  

interesting enough

i would like felton more than parker. the felton trade actually gives us the 22nd pick too where we can get a wing player like tyler honeycutt or chris singleton. i prefer honeycutt ’cause of his upside

by D00M on Jun 21, 2011 11:53 PM PDT reply actions  

Singleton + Felton < Parker

IMO I like Felton but Parker is a proven winner. I’d really like to get Chris Singleton or Kenneth Faried at 22 but that is unlikely.

"Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?"

by Schneezel on Jun 21, 2011 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Says who?

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

Parker sets the Kings up for disappointment

if he comes to the kings i anticipate his numbers dropping because he isnt dishing to players like duncan and ginobili and hes not getting coached as well. Nothing against Westphal but hes no Gregg Popovich. Parker has flourished in that setting for so long i dont necessarily see him handling being thrust onto the Kings that well. At least at first. I think eventually he would be a great addition to the Kings because of his veteren leadership and because he’s much more of a true point guard then anyone else the kings have. But there would be an adjustmant period, possibly resulting in another bad first half of the season, which no one would like to see. It may be worth it long term but it definately could make this upcoming season underwhelming and disappointing.

I officially floccinaucinihilipilificate Drew Gooden, Gerald Wallace, DeJuan Blair, Scott Brooks, the Los Angeles Clippers, and the internet!

by White Brocklate on Jun 22, 2011 12:29 AM PDT reply actions  

Parker is smart.

He’d adapt quickly.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Woj via Twitter

If Spurs deal Tony Parker to Kings for 7th pick, expect Omri Caspi to be part of package, sources say. RC Buford has been long fond of him.

The Kings coaching staff, in win-now mode to stay employed, are fully behind trading the 7th pick for an established player, sources say.

by Totes Magotes on Jun 22, 2011 12:29 AM PDT reply actions  

Well...

Omri, baby…I love you. But, uh, please hold the door open for Mr. Parker on your way out.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

THIS COULD BE...

huge. Really huge. a healthy tony parker could honestly push the kings into Playoffs. He’s a proven winner and is used to playing with two other stars( timmy = dmc and REKE = mano )

…or it could blow up in every ones face and Set our cheap team back a couple years.

by LongTimeReader1stTimeBlogger on Jun 22, 2011 12:36 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

The whole Parker and Felton situation indicates that

the Kings are after a PG via a trade, meaning that they definitely prefer a SF in the draft.

Bleeding Black and Purple 6710 miles South East of Sacramento.

by ZenBaller on Jun 22, 2011 12:50 AM PDT reply actions  

You're kinda missing the fact that we're giving up that pick in the trade, I think.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Right!

Bleeding Black and Purple 6710 miles South East of Sacramento.

by ZenBaller on Jun 22, 2011 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

so if we do draft a pg

would that mean tyreke starts at the 3? or thornton comes off the bench.. ‘cause i don’t think thornton would want to resign to play off the bench like he did in NO

by D00M on Jun 22, 2011 12:53 AM PDT reply actions  

thats why they need to draft Bismack or Jonas Valanciunas,Tyreke isnt a 3,Thornton is good enough to be a starter,and good guards can be found in the second round like Goudelock and Adam Hanga

by NastyNas on Jun 22, 2011 12:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

No to Bismack

Love Jonas, but dont think he comes over next year.

Can't wait for October

by KingsFanInPortland on Jun 22, 2011 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions  

Even if Thornton came off the bench he’d get plenty of minutes at the 6th man role. I can see him becoming a Jason Terry type player. But the NO situation was different. He earned time after what he did for that team last year when Chris Paul was injured, obviously him and Monty Williams had a personal problem because he played less than 12 minutes night in and night out. No disrespect to Marco Belinelli but Marcus Thornton is a much better player than him, he should have received a lot more playing time.

by james_kevin18 on Jun 22, 2011 1:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yahoo Sports is a Troll Sports Site

There is zero cred to this little story. San Antonio parting with Parker at 29?? LMAO I didn’t know it was fairy tale time on here…

by JVinci on Jun 22, 2011 1:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Marc Stein is talking about it today

And Woj. And nearly everyone else. Are we still at zero cred?

The Spurs have cap issues, and if they have determined that their championship window has closed, it’s time for them to unload and reload. Their deepest position is PG, where George Hill can take the reins. This is their opportunity to shed salary, get younger, and start reloading for their next run. Whether it happens or not, that is the reasoning behind it, and it seems rather sound to me.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 22, 2011 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

the source being cited is yahoo for the other guys too

That’s not credible enough for me. If a trade for parker does happen, I will change my opinion.

by JVinci on Jun 22, 2011 12:55 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

So -

Trade rumors are not credible unless they happen? Okie dokie.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jun 22, 2011 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I just see this as the perfect fit

Think about it this way. We could be trading Kawhi Leonard for Tony Parker, more or less. It’s been mentioned that we would “need” to move Beno, but I disagree. He would take a hit in his minutes, but I think he would still be valuable to the team. At this point, our weakness becomes bench scoring, and Beno’s ability to run the pick and role and mid-range game would really help that out.

Look at it this way. If the this trade gets done, and we sign a solid SF like Prince and resign Sammy, all of a sudden you have a team with the perfect blend of youth and veterans. Just thinking about that lineup gets me all goose pimply.

Phil Jackson, after treatment for a kidney stone "When the anesthesiologist leaned over me, he said "We named your kidney stone Kobe because it's not passing."

by Ellimist on Jun 22, 2011 1:44 AM PDT reply actions  

I don;t get the love affair people have with Prince.

No thanks.

Check out my comedy website, where you can access video clips of my stand-up @ here

"Put Kobe or Lebron in a wheelchair, and I can GUARANTEE Tyreke would demolish either. You might want to rethink what you just said." - MarcusC.

"I never read those trade threads. They seem to be mainly populated with the sports equivalent of people who think the Rapture is imminent." - andy sims.

by PhutureKings on Jun 22, 2011 1:46 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Kyle Lowry
Small
A Learning Experience on Loyalty For Sacramento Via Golden State
Lionel_small
#HereWeStay
Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration (UofL days)
Kings_sports_illustrated_small
Funny story
Small
As I sit here and watch the OKC Thunder come back against the Lakers
Waymantisdale-tz-150_small
the owners called down the thunder
Chief_petty_officer_small
Maturity in Sacramento Debacle
Small
Ryan Anderson to the Kings - Petrie's Gotta Give It A Thought
Chief_petty_officer_small
Open letter to the Maloofs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G