Why I trust Keith Smart
Keith Smart is a very interesting coach to examine. This man has never coached a winning NBA franchise. So why was he chosen to replace Paul Westphal?
The first reason why Smart was chosen to replace Westphal is because he was a logical, in-house choice. The Kings' players were already somewhat familiar with his coaching style and he already had some idea of what he was going to be working with. Plus what coach wouldn't want another opportunity after the way he was let go from Golden State? Perhaps the most compelling part of it all is how Coach Smart is able to maintain such a positive attitude through it all. His puppy could be killed right in front of him and I'm inclined to think that he would say something to the effect of "That's a part of life" or "Every good pet must pass on." Call me an optimist but I love how optimistic Smart is. That optimism rubs off on the players no matter what their attitude is. Take DeMarcus Cousins for instance. Was there ever a player more down and out around three weeks ago? Look at him now since Smart has taken over. The dude is back to being the double-doubles machine that we know and love. In fact, he has had double-doubles in all of Smart's four games as coach including a career-high 19 rebounds tonight against the Raptors.
Tyreke is another person to take into account in this whole situation. This is a player that was admittedly lost under Paul Westphal. Perhaps the best thing for Smart to do was to put the ball exclusively in Tyreke's hands. Tyreke is the only ankle-breaker on the Kings outside of Isaiah Thomas. He also has been in the league for two and a half years and knows the ropes a little bit. It is no coincidence that Tyreke is averaging much closer to his 20-5-5 output as a rookie than his uncharacteristic lack of production the past year and a half. It is amazing what psychology has to do with how players perform. If a coach shows confidence in a player, win or lose, the player will most likely respond to that in a positive way more often than not. That is what we are seeing with the Kings. Yeah that 27-point loss to a red hot Sixers team was demoralizing to say the least, but you have to put it in context. To come back the next night and get a quality win on the second night of a back-to-back against any NBA team is a pretty big positive no matter who you play. Winning on the road is something that Smart has mentioned as the key to being a competitive team. Tonight was the first step in that process.
That's another thing I love about Smart; he understands that becoming a good NBA team is a process. He doesn't get impatient with his rotations and sit players because they have a bad shooting night. That was a prominent criticism of Westphal, and for good reason. Again it goes back to player psychology. If a player fears that having a bad shooting night might affect his playing time, is he more likely to play differently than he normally would if he had no fear? Absolutely! Smart rides out the storm no matter what it brings. He understands when to call timeouts and he doesn't second guess the players he subs in the game. Right or wrong, the players know that Smart has their back. As a result, they play harder because they respect him as their coach. After awhile the wins start coming and Smart's job becomes easier. No longer does he have to maintain his optimism despite the losses. Eventually the players become intrinsically optimistic because they are seeing the results of their play and effort in the box score. Again, this isn't rocket science but just a little insight into effective human relations. Belief and effort are more powerful than talent and athleticism many times.
Like Smart and the rest of the Kings organization continue to state: It's a process. The Kings aren't going to win every night or even most nights. The important part is that they don't have regular, extended losing streaks. They need to stay afloat on the road and take care of business at PBP. The Western Conference is very wide open this year after the top 5 or 6 teams. Teams like Memphis and New Orleans aren't what they were last year. The Clippers have improved, along with some other teams, but the Kings have proven that they can play with any team in the league on a given night. With Smart at the helm, the Kings will bring it most nights and will be pretty competitive on a regular basis imo. This team has talent. Finally now we are starting to see the importance of a little psychology and how it affects the performance of some of this franchise's most important players.
Stay tuned for some more Smart psychology.
(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)
12 comments
|
17 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rec'd
Because I am a sucker for optimism!
"If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well
It were done quickly..."
The difference between how Westphal and Smart
each used Cousins is enough to make the hiring worth it for me.
Look at the FG% when he played for each.
"We're not talking about me and Darko in the same sentence." - Chris Webber vs KAHN!
by caseycheesecake on Jan 11, 2012 10:26 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
The final report card for Smart will come at the end of the season.
Smart rides out the storm no matter what it brings.
But for now, his infusion of optimism and hope for a team that was frozen in uncertainty is a ray of sunshine on a gloomy day.
Asked if the Kings had any intention of trading Cousins, basketball president Geoff Petrie said, "No."
I'm not on the Keith Smart bandwagon (yet),
but this is a very compelling and well-reasoned post as to why I should jump on. Very well done, and rec’d.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Jan 12, 2012 8:17 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
"Perhaps the best thing for Smart to do was to put the ball exclusively in Tyreke's hands"
Don’t agree with that sentiment, but I agree with everything else. In hindsight, I’m thinking Westphal should have reined Reke in a lot more. It’s on the players too, I don’t see Rip Hamilton standing around even in a Paul Westphal or Kenny Natt offense, but the coach is supposed to demand a fluid offense.
Smart looks like he can relate to the players, I’d like to see him get through to Reke, where Reke gets plenty of touches but isn’t helps instead of hinders the offensive flow.
Great Read and Rec'd
"Smelling the cork from an open bottle of wine is like smelling a woman's ass before you make love to her"
Miles from the novel "Sideways"
by A Night At The Arco on Jan 12, 2012 9:01 AM PST reply actions
Good read, CKF
I’m cautiously optimistic about Smart. He may or may not be a quality NBA coach, it remains to be seen. He definitely has made an impact on this young team, though, and it shows on the court, and I’m definitely glad that PW was let go (seriously liked the guy, thought he signed on for an uphill climb, but totally lost the team this year and had to go.)
Psychology / chemistry / atmosphere definitely make a difference with a team, and I think Smart at least understands that and tries to get the players to embrace this type of culture. It also has to be augmented with intelligent on-floor and systematic coaching decisions, but so far I like his approach. Keep writing, mane…
...Watching DeMarcus Cousins’ transformation from large human to immortal kill beast...
Hadn't given Smart much thought other than my first reaction "better than Westphal"
I was watching his interview after the win in Toronto and as I listened Smart made a lot of sense. Wasn’t the normal blah…blah…blah you often hear. Then they played his interview after the beat down in Philly and he didn’t sound all that different. He understands the process, he doesn’t make excuses and he knows the game. I thought his rotations against the Raptors made sense and Demarcus played out of mind but not insane. Reke was passing, Izzy was rocking and the boys were showing each other a lot of love, even before the win was assured.
I still don’t think Jimmer has any business starting but again, that’s a process.
Frances Amthor: I think you're a very stupid person. You look stupid, you're in a stupid business, and you're on a stupid case.
Philip Marlowe: I get it. I'm stupid Farewell My Lovely (1975)
And in this vein I get what I want how I want it because I am the customer. You might want to remember that you thieving scumbag mongrel bitches.
nate21h@evilcowtowninc.com
Coaching in the NBA is really firggin tough
If I had to ballpark how many high quality coaches there are in the league who consistently get the most out of their players night in and night out, I’d name:
Thibodeau
Spoelstra?
Doc
Scotty Brooks (remember when we passed on him? Ouch)
Nate McMillan
Rick Carlisle
Pop
Adelman
There might be a few more and cases could be made for guys like Mike Woodson or Mike D’Antoni but what I’m saying is that the expectation isn’t for the guy you just hired to be a long-lasting and well respected coach. From the things I’ve heard Smart say thus far about the kind of system he’d like to employ here, the team’s clear positive response to his personality, and his quality assistant coaching history serving under well-respected coaches, I’m inclined to think that Smart has more potential to fit into that narrow category of quality coaches I just named than what we’ve seen in a long while.
I'd agree. He's doing an awesome job this year.
and I meant Mike Brown, not Woodson…
Think Spoelstra, Doc and Books are all questionable.
Spoelstra has three top 20 players (2 top 5). Not saying he’s a bad coach, but if he took over our team tomorrow, I have no idea if he could coach or if it would be a disaster.
Doc is like a less abrasive version of Westphal. Excelled with three HOF players. But he was lousy, played terrible rotations and failed to develop young players before the Big 3 came to town. If he had been fired from the Celtics before the Big 3 and hired to replace Natt here, I’m not confident our team would be much better.
Brooks I think is the best of the bunch. He was smart enough to undo PJ’s stupidity (PJ mismanaged OKC, much the way Westphal here playing Evans off ball and Cousins/Hickson high post). He’s been spotty in the playoffs against the better coaches and has a superstar and 2nd tier star. I do like how the young players have developed though. He may belong on the list, but I think it’s too early to tell.

by 


















