Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Veterans Share Favorite Sports Memories

The Kings, according to a source, will not be offering Thompson -- no longer starting in Sacramento and posting career lows in points and rebounds -- an extension.

4 months ago Images_tiny wallywagon11 21 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

In a related story...

The Kings may give Jason Thompson the starting role over JJ Hickson :-/

by CrownedPotential on Jan 17, 2012 1:43 PM PST reply actions  

Also in the article...
J.J. Hickson, Kings (19th)

The agent for both players, Andy Miller, said last week that he’d had “boilerplate” conversations with the Kings about an extension for Hickson, but had not made much headway. Hickson is hoping that Sacramento wants to keep him around after giving up a first-round pick and forward Omri Casspi for him last summer. The two sides will “revisit” a deal in the next few days, Miller said.

by CrownedPotential on Jan 17, 2012 1:57 PM PST reply actions  

Have to say that I don't like this

Whatever his faults, JT’s a consistently hard worker, and his willingness this year to finish at the rim with dunks, rather than garbage flips that rim out, has been great. It’s a shame to think how he might have developed under different coaching, he’s always appeared to be someone willing to put the time in. I assume the motivation for extending JJ over JT is greater upside; good thing the organization has shown such remarkable player development over the years…

by lead_pipe on Jan 17, 2012 2:21 PM PST reply actions  

This saddens me

He has been the best player on the team this year. I really hope this doesn’t affect his effort he’s been showing so far this season. It’s even worse that they are considering an extension for JJ but not JT. Just terrible

Sanka....you dead? Ya Man

by prowseinthehouse on Jan 17, 2012 2:27 PM PST reply actions  

This upsets me, especially when JT has been putting in the effort and showing improvement.

Asked if the Kings had any intention of trading Cousins, basketball president Geoff Petrie said, "No."

by Slam_Dunk on Jan 17, 2012 3:07 PM PST reply actions  

Devil's advocate

If the Kings do not tender offers to Thompson or Hickson, they go into next year with about $40m in salary. If they took the $20m that they will be under the cap (figuring a $2m bump in the cap) and made oversized offers to RFA’s D.J. Augustin and Ryan Anderson, would the team be better?

Of course, this will not happen, as it is predicated on the insane notion that the owners will actually spend more than the league mandated minimum. But if it could happen, what do you think?

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jan 17, 2012 3:23 PM PST up reply actions  

Okay, I see your points on having greater salary flexibility. That makes sense.

Asked if the Kings had any intention of trading Cousins, basketball president Geoff Petrie said, "No."

by Slam_Dunk on Jan 17, 2012 3:33 PM PST up reply actions  

JT would not take much money at all

I don’t see any point in keeping Hickson. I don’t think keeping JT or letting JT go would have much impact on said scenario at all. What worries me is that they are considering extending Hickson which I think is a bad idea especially since I think he’ll demand more and GP’s habit of overpaying returning players.

Sanka....you dead? Ya Man

by prowseinthehouse on Jan 17, 2012 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

JT's qualifying offer stands at $4.1m

Not sure if they can negotiate an extension under that number or not.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jan 17, 2012 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

I didn't think about just signing a new deal as a RFA instead

that would be ok with me. I’d just hate to see him go, he is a great role player. What would really urk me is if they kept Hickson instead just to protect GP’s ego

Sanka....you dead? Ya Man

by prowseinthehouse on Jan 17, 2012 4:42 PM PST up reply actions  

That would be great!

I’m fine with not jumping the gun on JT like we did Garcia. I would just be livid if we offered JJ an extension right now

by Allbenji on Jan 17, 2012 5:20 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Sweet, more money

So we can barely grace the minimum salary cap by squandering it on another dead fish (Salmons,Outlaw I’m looking at you – but mostly at Salmons).

Claremont Mckenna College
Forbes #3 in the West, #12 in the Nation
"Crescit cum comercio civicas"

Throw it around the back so it look fly when I pass//
Just to avoid the block go high off the glass//
I'm killing them out there they gon' have to bring caskets//
This all I hear after the baskets *swoosh*//

by HarveySpecter on Jan 17, 2012 8:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I understand this more than I understand why the Kings aren't starting him over Hickson

JT is an obvious candidate for letting him test the market as a RFA, since the Kings will be able to match any contracts. He’s not good enough to get vastly overpaid, but if someone wants to, by all means let them. Otherwise, the Kings can give JT a 4-5 million a year deal for 4 years, which would be fine with me.

Author of NBA Mashups. Follow me on Twitter here.

by Aykis16 on Jan 17, 2012 3:21 PM PST reply actions   3 recs

Agree. I'd also add both players are candidates to come back on a qualifying offer

Both JT and JJ have a lot to prove. No need to commit 5-6 million a year on one prematurely. Though it could cost us more in the long run if one (JJ particularly) breaks out.

by SPTSJUNKIE on Jan 18, 2012 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

While I agree with Aykis, I dont like the signings this year and not starting JT and dint like all this , and that it’s coming out right now with all the Turmoil

Founder of team Omté Caspeen

by Widowwolf on Jan 17, 2012 10:52 PM PST reply actions  

Apoet is on freakin fire!

That might be one of the best takes I’ve ever read on this site. Good job my man.

by Allbenji on Jan 18, 2012 11:26 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

You should think about reposting this as its own FanPost

just my $.02. Rec’d.

時國王驕奢,不遵典憲。 《後漢書》
When Kings are too proud and extravagant, they do not obey the rules and regulations, and thus end up in foul trouble.
_Book_of_the_Later_Han_ (ca. 400 A.D.)

by sj60615 on Jan 18, 2012 11:38 AM PST up reply actions  

That's a good idea

This should get front page :)

by Allbenji on Jan 18, 2012 12:19 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I dont want to go off on a rant or anything...but

"First we get jobs, then we get the khakis, then we get the chicks."

by Wonderchild on Jan 18, 2012 12:45 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Kyle Lowry
Small
A Learning Experience on Loyalty For Sacramento Via Golden State
Lionel_small
#HereWeStay
Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration (UofL days)
Kings_sports_illustrated_small
Funny story
Small
As I sit here and watch the OKC Thunder come back against the Lakers
Waymantisdale-tz-150_small
the owners called down the thunder
Chief_petty_officer_small
Maturity in Sacramento Debacle
Small
Ryan Anderson to the Kings - Petrie's Gotta Give It A Thought
Chief_petty_officer_small
Open letter to the Maloofs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G