Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Arena Opponent Will Attempt To Put Downtown Sacramento Facility On Ballot

Ryan Lillis of the Sacramento Bee reports that Sacramento City Councilwoman Sandy Sheedy, who opposes building a new entertainment and sports complex in downtown Sacramento, will ask the Council to put a measure on the June ballot asking for voter approval to use public parking assets to help provide capital for the facility. The push is clearly a device to either stall the arena decision to past the point of no return for the chance to keep the Sacramento Kings in town, or to crank up pressure on Mayor Kevin Johnson's campaign to win council approval for the leasing of downtown parking inventory to provide initial capital for the construction.

The council is expected to vote on a parking lease proposal in February. Sheedy has been beating the popular vote drum since it became apparent she was in a clear minority on the council in opposition of the arena. She will almost assuredly demonize as undemocratic any councilmembers who do not vote with her in this naked ploy to politicize the ESC push. Sheedy has a well-documented feud with Johnson over endorsements in council races, and is using the arena push as a political prop.

As Lillis notes, it is highly unlikely that Sheedy's trickery will be eaten up by the council; Darrell Fong, a swaying palm, may vote with her, but it's difficult to see anyone else on the concil voting to castrate itself ahead of a big decision next month.

Nonetheless, supporters of the ESC project cannot cede an inch to Sheedy's ham-handed politics. If you can make the Tuesday meeting, please do so and remind the council why a new entertainment and sports complex in downtown Sacramento is so vital to our communities and region.

Comment 64 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I would rather they have the balls to vote no on the arena than to take the cowards way out that Sheedy is suggesting.

It is the no vote.

by wallywagon11 on Jan 19, 2012 3:01 PM PST up reply actions  

the projects that did not have to go to public vote (such as the community center) that were successful and ended up being a boon to the city both in revenue and in increased tourism.

I think one problem is people remember things like the Sheraton hotel.

by wallywagon11 on Jan 19, 2012 3:46 PM PST up reply actions  

There was a Sheraton hotel?

35 and 31. I'm calling it now. Reke and Cousins 1-2 in most improved award both All-stars. Jimmer leads rookies in scoring, passing and Ole's. Make 2nd round of playoffs and Salmons is not here by seasons end.

by ElRonToro on Jan 19, 2012 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Didnt the sale of the Sheraton net city big profit?

And bring us arguably one of our two nicest hotels? What’s the issue there?

Can't wait for October

by KingsFanInPortland on Jan 19, 2012 5:59 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Although the sale of the Sheraton itself is a tad bit controversial, I honestly wasn't referring to that

I was referring to the tax-exempt revenue bond financing of the Sheraton which was tied to the Convention Center. I was alluding to the fact that there were projections with the project that were very much incorrect and people remember those things.

by wallywagon11 on Jan 19, 2012 6:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Projections for hotel were off at first, but ended up making big profit right?

Or are you referring to convention center projections being off?

Can't wait for October

by KingsFanInPortland on Jan 19, 2012 6:45 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I don't want to get too bogged down into the sale of the Sheraton which is where the city saw it's "big profit."

but the city was having a very difficult time paying the bond debt on the project, it did not increase convention use nearly much as stated which was half the reason the public paid for it, and the other big reason for public spending on it was it would increase occupancy at the other downtown hotels which it actually decreased along with decreasing the prices. The city almost stopped making payments on the hotel before selling it which would have been a significant downgrade on the city’s credit.

by wallywagon11 on Jan 19, 2012 8:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Ah

Yea I remembered the Convention Center didn’t do the projected business, just didn’t know how it was all tied together

Can't wait for October

by KingsFanInPortland on Jan 19, 2012 9:00 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Yes BIG!!

Lets go time to THINK BIG right?

Lets rally at a game, get it coordinated properly. Show em we still want our Kings!!

Sacramento Kings, Oakland Raiders. Best teams everrrrrrr

by Robby1987 on Jan 19, 2012 4:35 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Amen

Out of all the city council meetings I’ve seen, the most intelligent thing I’ve heard her discuss is her review on the new Smash Burger in her district.

by HeuristicLineup on Jan 19, 2012 2:16 PM PST up reply actions  

If anyone lives in District 2...

remember this come next City Council election. Here are the boundaries, http://www.cityofsacramento.org/gis/documents/Council_Dist2_A.pdf

My old account was lars.ON but I change it to match my Twitter handle.

Follow me on Twitter

by kwlarson on Jan 19, 2012 2:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Lol

I guess Ill be one of em voting against her.

Sacramento Kings, Oakland Raiders. Best teams everrrrrrr

by Robby1987 on Jan 19, 2012 4:38 PM PST up reply actions   3 recs

My parents own commercial property in that district

The mall excluded (maybe included?) it’s not a great part of town. I’d be surprised if she actually lived there.

by misterbrister on Jan 20, 2012 6:31 AM PST up reply actions  

So basically

she’s courting Occupiers.

formerly what_the_crap

by Dub_TC on Jan 19, 2012 2:23 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed.

I agree with the Occupy movement and also understand that an ESC, if done right, would make Downtown Sac more fun, would create jobs and bring people (and their money) to the area, where everyone benefits.

Plus, the Maloofs are not rich.

by Carl on Jan 19, 2012 3:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Occupiers in Sacramento are mostly bums

Not “bums” as being lazy, but “bums” as literal homeless bums. I remember driving by when it started and I didn’t think it was like occupy NY, but rather bums trying sleep in the park, thus I don’t think they meet the requirements to vote.

by SharkKings49 on Jan 19, 2012 2:45 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Too bad we can't vote on our owners

Dude on the right looks qualified to run a team and even the president wanted to hold that man’s resume’.

by SharkKings49 on Jan 19, 2012 2:42 PM PST up reply actions   3 recs

Basketball aside (politics not)

Colbert has been awesome as of late making a mockery of our political system

by yaboyrafa on Jan 19, 2012 2:44 PM PST up reply actions  

if i lived in south carolina

i would most definitely be voting for Herman Cain haha

by yaboyrafa on Jan 19, 2012 3:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

I grew up reading Art Buchwald, but he and Jon Stewart are taking political satire to an entirely new level.

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jan 19, 2012 2:47 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

thank god though

somebody (with money) needs to expose the huge flaws especially when it comes to campaigns and super pacs haha

by yaboyrafa on Jan 19, 2012 3:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I must have missed it

Did Colbert really call out Sheedy or was it a photoshop thats been circulated around enough to become a fact? Was he the only member of the national media to talk about the Kings/Sheedy poll?

by SharkKings49 on Jan 19, 2012 2:50 PM PST up reply actions  

It was a kfipp special

I love that nutty bastard!

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jan 19, 2012 3:35 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

He's a jerk

BRING BACK THE ARCO THUNDER....STOMP!

by kfipp on Jan 19, 2012 3:54 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

A buddy advised me of this site...

AFTER I went through the trouble of photoshopping this one.

BRING BACK THE ARCO THUNDER....STOMP!

by kfipp on Jan 19, 2012 4:31 PM PST up reply actions  

She has nothing to gain from responding the C.D.

The people she would be defending her stance to, couldn’t care less by what she has to say. The people who care what she thinks, couldn’t careless what C.D. has to say.

by HeuristicLineup on Jan 19, 2012 3:30 PM PST up reply actions  

That's probably true

Maybe I’m alone on this, but if she has legitimate concerns about the financing and long term ramifications of the ESC I would love to know about it.

by Crocoduck on Jan 20, 2012 7:38 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I always thought

You voted so the folks you voted for made decisions that were in the best interests of the community. If you don’t like the decisions being made you can always vote for someone else at the next election.

I don’t think she is ignorant she is playing to a position that she either agrees with her or worse will allow her to get reelected next time

I would suggest if she had a genuine concern she would go on the radio and have a grown up discussion stating whatever objections she would have for an arena project.

by Murf on Jan 19, 2012 2:50 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

if she had a genuine concern she would go on the radio and have a grown up discussion stating whatever objections she would have for an arena project.

and present a plan to replace the loss of the kings and those kings created jobs to the local economy? A leader can’t just say no they gotta also say yes to something.

Mirror on the wall
Here we are again.

by Skeptic con Urquell on Jan 19, 2012 3:13 PM PST reply actions  

I don't like our city council.

At USC we're not snobs, we're just better than you.

by TrojanCBB on Jan 19, 2012 3:24 PM PST reply actions  

I do

currently the majority of them are on our side.

by HeuristicLineup on Jan 19, 2012 3:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm just kind of wondering

when was the last city council that had a 50% or more approval rating (not including first 6 months after election)?
We may be in an it is what it is situation.

35 and 31. I'm calling it now. Reke and Cousins 1-2 in most improved award both All-stars. Jimmer leads rookies in scoring, passing and Ole's. Make 2nd round of playoffs and Salmons is not here by seasons end.

by ElRonToro on Jan 19, 2012 5:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Sandy Sheedy said on December 13th, "We cannot afford to lose the arts."

According to the Sacramento Press:

http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/15863

Community Theater Renovation
by Michael Zwahlen, published on October 19, 2009 at 9:39 PM

The Theater will be financed using bonds from future bonds issued by the City of Sacramento Financing Authority. Bond repayments will come from a $3.00 per ticket where approximately $1 million will go toward the bond payment of $3.7 million annually and the remaining $2.7 million coming from Transient Occupancy Tax and Convention Center User Fee proceeds.

The current renovation will re-configure some existing spaces and add approximately 15,000 new square feet to the building. The total costs of the project are estimated at $40 million with $34 million towards construction and $6 million for design costs.

I have not found any other articles to dispute that so if that is the case…

From the Sacramento Bee:

SACRAMENTO – Some on council urge regional arena funding – THEY WANT OTHER GOVERNMENTS TO HELP FINANCE DEAL
Sacramento Bee, The (CA) – Thursday, December 15, 2011
Author: Ryan Lillis ; rlillis@sacbee.com

One financing possibility that appears to have limited traction is redirecting hotel taxes slated to pay for a $48 million renovation of the Community Center Theater.

I do not recall seeing anything about a public vote on either renovations. When you add up both renovations the total comes close to $100 million. So, where is the public vote on the arts?

If you want to go back even further…

CURTAIN RISING AGAIN AT MEMORIAL AUDITORIUM – MERCHANTS PIN HOPES FOR REVIVAL ON CITY LANDMARK
The Sacramento Bee – Sunday, November 3, 1996
Author: Emily Bazar Bee Staff Writer

The auditorium, which covers the block bounded by 15th, 16th, I and J streets, was closed in 1986 because of fears it couldn’t withstand an earthquake. After initial plans to convert it into a fixed-seat theater were shot down with the passage of Measure H in 1992, the auditorium received a scaled-down, $10.8 million restoration.

by SacTownMike on Jan 19, 2012 8:09 PM PST reply actions  

The Theater will be financed using bonds from future bonds issued by the City of Sacramento Financing Authority. Bond repayments will come from a $3.00 per ticket where approximately $1 million will go toward the bond payment of $3.7 million annually and the remaining $2.7 million coming from Transient Occupancy Tax and Convention Center User Fee proceeds.

Pretty sure the Transient Occupancy Tax actually was voter approved.

After initial plans to convert it into a fixed-seat theater were shot down with the passage of Measure H in 1992, the auditorium received a scaled-down, $10.8 million restoration.

Again, pretty sure the Transient Occupancy Tax actually was voter approved

I do not recall seeing anything about a public vote on either renovations. When you add up both renovations the total comes close to $100 million. So, where is the public vote on the arts?

Again, pretty sure the Transient Occupancy Tax actually was voter approved.

by wallywagon11 on Jan 19, 2012 8:37 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

wally...

I was only able to find that the council approved. I’ll have to research this some more. If you can find any information please post.

I don’t have a problem with supporting the arts. There should be something for everyone.

by SacTownMike on Jan 19, 2012 8:54 PM PST reply actions  

It's The Arts

SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!

by section214 on Jan 19, 2012 9:02 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Her email and office phone number.

If you don’t find what you’re looking for, or if you have any suggestions on how we can improve the page, just let me know by e-mail at ssheedy@cityofsacramento.org or by phone at 808-7002.

by Scott Section 213 on Jan 19, 2012 9:14 PM PST reply actions  

I sent an email

And would encourage others to send her one as well

Can't wait for October

by KingsFanInPortland on Jan 20, 2012 9:58 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

(916) 808-7007

Mr. Darrell Fong’s office number…above, email below.

dfong@cityofsacramento.org

His email was buried on his page. But, I found it.

by Scott Section 213 on Jan 19, 2012 9:24 PM PST reply actions  

Uncertain

Well all for the arena but it might just cost me my job or a salary of minimum wage so hopefully neither happens

by City worker on Jan 23, 2012 5:54 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Kyle Lowry
Small
A Learning Experience on Loyalty For Sacramento Via Golden State
Lionel_small
#HereWeStay
Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration (UofL days)
Kings_sports_illustrated_small
Funny story
Small
As I sit here and watch the OKC Thunder come back against the Lakers
Waymantisdale-tz-150_small
the owners called down the thunder
Chief_petty_officer_small
Maturity in Sacramento Debacle
Small
Ryan Anderson to the Kings - Petrie's Gotta Give It A Thought
Chief_petty_officer_small
Open letter to the Maloofs

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Editor

Loofie_small Tom Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Demarcus_thornton_small Aykis16

Associate Editor

Coachie_small rbiegler

Banana2_small Exhibit G