This post is about the article which can be found at the following link: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1559794-david-stern-claims-seattles-offer-for-kings-is-stronger-than-sacramentos-bid?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=sacramento-kings
There is a poll on the side of the article. VOTE!
With all due respect to Seattle, I hate seeing 69% of the people taking a poll, no matter how stupid or misinformed the people are, saying they think the kings should be playing in Seattle over Sacramento. Now get over to this page and vote for the Kings! Not the Supersonics!
I realize that this is just a stupid bleacher report article, but it's one more place that people are reading about the kings, and seeing that so many people think Seattle is a better place for an NBA team makes us look bad. I also think the article is terrible because it says that "leaving Sacramento wouldn't be the worst thing for the Kings franchise. The team hasn't been competitive in the Western Conferense for years." And then in the last paragraph, it acknowledges that the Maloofs (as the cause of the kings mediocrity), are the ones responsible for the lack of competitiveness: "Years of mediocrity and poor ownership have left the fanbase very numb to the present product."
The Kings need new ownership, not a new city. Let's show the mainstream media that Sacramento fans are not "numb" and that leaving Sacramento would in fact be the worst thing for this franchise!!!