ESPN's Chad Ford is dumb

I was watching a video segment on the other day about teams tanking. (No, they did not say the Kings are tanking.) I was merely curious to see what they said about other possibly tanking teams around the league. And despite what the league office says, clearly some teams decide they have no chance for the playoffs and hold fire sales on the talent they do have in hopes of drafting the next LeBron; thereby tanking.

But what made my blood boil was something Chad Ford said. The subject had naturally morphed to what players on tanking teams might be available for teams looking for a little extra oomph as they head toward the playoffs. He said teams need to be careful about adding players and "expect them to overnight turn the team around." No argument there.

But then…he decided to keep yapping and citing some examples of such questionable player additions. First up on his list?

"Just look at the Sacramento Kings and Rudy Gay."


He likened the Rudy Gay acquisition to the Luol Deng situation in Cleveland.

"Both of those were attempts by teams to add a veteran player to help them to turn things around on the court. And in both cases even though those are good players and made sense on each of those teams they really haven’t been better in the won-loss column."

(You can see it at, with the Kings/Rudy Gay remark around the 2:00 mark.)

Clearly Ford has paid little attention to the Kings and how they have improved with the addition of Rudy. Sadly it seems as if many ESPN contributors pay scant attention to any non-championship contenders on the West Coast.

Now, I’m not making the argument that Rudy has turned them into a contender. Obviously Pete D’Allesandro has more work ahead of him till that happens. But since Rudy came to the Kings on Dec. 9 they have played at a .526 clip, going 10-19 at the time of the video (including the losing streak when Boogie sprained his ankle). Before Rudy’s arrival the Kings had played at a .462 clip, going 6-13.

(Edit: I made my own dumb mistake here with obviously erroneous numbers. Section214 has kindly pointed out the correct numbers below. Despite MY OWN dumbness, my original point that the Kings are indeed better with Rudy Gay is still valid, and I relearn the lesson that when I point a finger at someone three fingers are pointing back at me.)

If you extend out those numbers – a hypothetical, I admit – but if the Kings played at .526 for an entire season that would give them 43 wins. Probably still not enough to make the playoffs in a stacked Western Conference, but WAY better than previous years.

So, Dear Chad, please try to know some actual facts before you decide to pontificate with any erroneous examples.

(This is a FanPost from a member of the Sactown Royalty community. The views expressed come from the member, and not Sactown Royalty staff.)

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Sactown Royalty

You must be a member of Sactown Royalty to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Sactown Royalty. You should read them.

Join Sactown Royalty

You must be a member of Sactown Royalty to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Sactown Royalty. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.