Sactown Royalty: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Minor League Logos Better than the Thunder Logo Bar-right-arrows



Kings Sign John Salmons, Boot Bonzi and His Agent in the Ass

First off, let me just say that I love having no power. Rolling blackouts, or exploding transformers - whatever - all that stuff rules.

Everyone has heard by now, but John Salmons is a King. He got a deal worth $25.5 million over five years, which is $10.5 million cheaper than the Bonzi deal overall and about $3 million cheaper per year.

Geoff Petrie confirmed what everyone in the free world assumed about the signing: Bonzi Wells is not a King.

"It seemed clear that we just weren't going to get to that (financial) territory that (Wells and his agent, William Phillips) thought was necessary, and I told them that," Petrie said. "I said, 'It's just not going to happen, and we're going to have to go out and start being more aggressive, trying to find out what else we might be able to do.'"

Wells and Phillips wanted the Kings to bid against themselves, and that's not something Geoff Petrie is going to do. If no one with cap space is begging for your services, you're just not going to get more than the bare minimum from the home team. And it's not like Sactown owed him something for years of underpayment - the guy played 40 games and made $8 million.

As for Salmons - let's hope Petrie is right that The Philly Fish is something special. He's four years in, and he spent a full four years in college. He turns 27 in December. Right now, he's not a whole lot more than a Francisco Garcia with a little more experience, is he? Hell, even his sophomore season - 2004 - is the most similar season statswise in the NBA since 1978 to Francisco's 2006. The best attribute he's shown so far is his ability to pass the ball: He earned 4.3 assists for every bad pass last season, which is good. He's also shown he can get to the line pretty regularly.

He doesn't seem to be that good a shooter, though. In fact, the stats say he's not a good shooter. If this team needs something on the wings, it's shooting. That's why Bonzi Wells didn't make a whole lot of sense - we have strong post players, we need shooting and perimeter speed. Salmons does have speed - that's why both Colangelos wanted desparately to sign him last week. He's got the skills and the innate abilities to make it happen - he just has to put it together.

So what about the elephant in the room - that he just screwed two teams to sign a slightly higher deal with the Kings? I say, it shows he's intelligent and tenacious. Of course, plenty of people are tenacious about money. But I digress. It's becoming clear to me that the "basketball situation" that scared Salmons away from Toronto had nothing to do with the Raptors - it had to do with Geoff Petrie offering an extra $2.5 million. There's no way otherwise that Salmons could have left Toronto at the punch bowl and found other dance partner willing to pay a bigger dowry so quickly. Bryan Colangelo got played.

There's one more elephant, I'm afraid: who starts at shooting guard? If Bonzi was back, it was clear that Kevin Martin is your new sixth man. With Salmons, it's a bit less clear.

I think Martin is the starter. Salmons, being the Garcia clone he is, can play three positions well - point guard, off-guard, and small forward, in order of ability. Is that kind of versatility more valuable in the starting lineup, or off the bench? In the starting lineup, Bibby, Miller, and Artest can handle the ball and initiate the offense, and Bibby and Artest can actually bring the ball up. Off the bench - unless Quincy Douby decides to progress really fast or Jason Hart decides not to suck - Francisco is mainly the ball-handling replacement. Does it benefit the Kings' second squad to have two tall ball-handlers coming off the bench as one or two ball-handlers leaves the floor? Or would the team be better off having a fourth ball-handler (who might be the best passer on the time) in the starting lineup and relying on Garcia and leftover starters to take the load when Bibby or Artest sits?

In this sense, it makes sense to start Martin and have Salmons and Garcia as your super-subs. Assuming Bibby/Artest/Shareef/Miller is your other four, Salmons and Garica could theoretically sub in for any two of the starters. If Miller goes out, Shareef shifts to center, Artest to PF, and the sub plays SF. If Bibby goes out, the sub (Salmons or Garcia) plays PG. That's some terrific versatility, and it could help ensure the offense doesn't stagnate when key starters (especially Miller and Bibby) sit.

I could also see Salmons starting, though, and Martin being the Bobby Jackson type sub - the guy who comes in and starts throwing the ball at the rim from every spot on the floor. Quincy Douby should hopefully eventually fill that role in the offense; he's custom-built for it. But he probably won't be ready for 10-15 minutes a game this season (though I'd love to be surprised), so it'd be good to have a proven scorer to come in.

The Kings also signed Wyoming center Justin Williams and U of Portland point guard Pooh Jeter to contracts. This means they'll be in training camp, but the terms haven't been released (Pooh Jeter is not a priority for the Marc Steins of the hoops media?!) so we don't know if either is on a Louis Amundson-like partially guaranteed contract, which would mean roster spots are ensured.

At this point, I'd say Williams is a lock for the roster and Jeter is likely only if Hart is moved. Thus, my July 25 depth chart looks like...


PG: Bibby/Hart/Price
SG: Martin/Salmons/Douby
SF: Artest/Garcia/Amundson
PF: Abdur-Rahim/Thomas/Williamson
C:  Miller/Potapenko/Williams

Jeter definitely needs to see someone leave to get on the roster. Williams would certainly like to see someone disappear, as well. If Douby wants any playing time, Hart has to be gone, because Martin and Salmons should be getting the lion's share of the off-guard minutes and some point-guard minutes (for Salmons). Amundson, likewise, is getting pushed to near-Monia status.

And I'm now exhausted at 6:30 a.m. Awesome. Your depth charts in the comments; your votes in the new poll on the right.

0 recs | Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Re: Kings Sign John Salmons
Douby might be headed for the D-League now. 6 Gaurds is too much for one roster.. right? Perhaps Amundson as well. You can carry 12 active players (3 inactive) so currently:

PG:Bibby/Hart/Price
SG:Martin/Salmons
SF:Artest/Garcia
PF:SAR/Thomas/Williamson
C:Miller/Potapenko

I cannot see Corliss not being on this team so unless a trade happens he is in the lineup. Perhaps we waive/injured list Potapenko and give Williams a shot at backup 5. Is Jamaal Sampson out? I believe he is a FA... I guess we won't sign him again. I wish we could trade K9 for a real backup center. Corliss is old but I think he could hold down the backup PF spot. So could a certain former Pacific Tiger.

by Mityt on Jul 25, 2006 3:11 PM PDT   0 recs

Re: Kings Sign John Salmons
Yeah - Jeter, Williams, and Douby (in that order) are set to be the odd men out on the active roster. Trades that bring back fewer players than leave (for trade picks, trade exceptions, or 2-for-1s) would help the problem.

Adelman was anti-NBDL, and Petrie may be as well. We don't know how Muss feels about it, though.

by Ziller on Jul 25, 2006 3:32 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Salmons is better than Hart..............
I think Petrie may have seen something in his PG play last year for the Sixers.

Check those numbers here

14.5/3.5/8 isn't bad........even if it's only 4 games of data.......

Just a thought......

~ The Rev

by Reverend John on Jul 25, 2006 3:41 PM PDT   0 recs

Sign and Trade
We may be able to add another caliber player with Bonzi's sign and trade. I hope we can get Magiloire for him. The Bucks want to move him and we need to move Bonzi ASAP!!!

by kingme18 on Jul 25, 2006 5:36 PM PDT   0 recs

Re: Sign and Trade
i don't think the bucks will go for it if its long term, which i think wells wants a 3+ years deal for at least 8 mill (what's really the difference between millions?).  with bogut and villenueva as the core, they don't wanna do the Golden State Warriors act and overpay to sign/resign piece players.  only if the pacers didn't sign (or is about to) sign harrington... that 7.5 mill trade exception is appealing.  other than that, kt needs to go start for another team because his contract is too long and reef's contract has the same length but less money.

by dun on Jul 25, 2006 7:42 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Sactown Royalty, the best community of Sacramento Kings fans in the universe. That's not my opinion; it's scientific fact.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Farworld_water_small
Self-serving mention of Ron Artest
Small
What's our Over/Under for Wins and Losses this Year?
Small
With Brad gone where will our next Center come from?
Img_0922_small
What’s the over/under on Reggie Theus being fired midseason?
Small
Add a favicon to the website please
Small
What's next for the Kings? Look at the past.
Thunderwolf_small
A Kings Fans' Constitution
Small
Kings vs US-team - Where you place the loyalty?
2007_01_mooninite2_small
Updated Salary thoughts
Small
When do we bury the hatchet?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Editor

Tom_toon_small Ziller

Joe_kleine_small section214

Associate Editor

Ronnya_small rbiegler

ad

Site Meter