When there's nothing left to burn, you've got to set yourself on fire.
Brad Miller in the first half: 6-7, 13 pts.
Brad Miller in the second half: 4 FGAs.
Kevin Martin in the first three quarters: 11 pts on 9 FGAs.
Kevin Martin in the fourth quarter: 3 FGAs.
Kings advantage with Shareef Abdur-Rahim in the first half: +6.
Second-half minutes for Shareef Abdur-Rahim: 7.
Second-half minutes for Kenny Thomas: 8.
Ron Artest's career three-point percentage: .314
Ron Artest's 2006-07 three-point percentage: .255.
Ron Artest three-point attempts Tuesday night: 4.
I don't know what the hell to say anymore. One, two more losses, and it may well be impossible to get back into this thing. The easy part of the schedule has just come and gone, people!
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
Re: When there's nothing left to burn...
by ridnour8 on Jan 10, 2007 8:02 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: When there's nothing left to burn...
by Ziller on Jan 10, 2007 9:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cavs did it all
by Observer on Jan 10, 2007 8:57 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Forget "free Kenny"....
UNLV or the Pacific tigers at least would be a step up from a high school team....
by Rhondda Nunes on Jan 10, 2007 1:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: When there's nothing left to burn
by chupacabra on Jan 10, 2007 9:55 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: When there's nothing left to burn
by chupacabra on Jan 10, 2007 10:03 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: When there's nothing left to burn
by chupacabra on Jan 10, 2007 10:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: When there's nothing left to burn, you've got
by Carl on Jan 10, 2007 11:12 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
pyro on fire!
We look really good at times. Just enough to keep us all on the edge of hope. Then the team goes Jekyl and Hyde out of nowhere. We KNOW they can play well - we just saw them do it! If they never played like they did in the first half, which was solid and dominating, we would simply think they did the best they can and respect their effort. What the heck happens to suddenly make the team, not one but a majority, totally and completely fall apart?
From the Bee: "We went away from team ball and did one-on-one," said forward Shareef Abdur-Rahim, who started in place of Thomas. "In a sense, it's sad. These last three games, we've played almost more than 3 1/2 quarters and almost a full game, but then we play terrible. It's a tale of two teams."
It isn't sad. It is down right depressing and as a result we are all looking for whom to blame like freaking Katrina just hit. Personally, I think it all starts at the clipboard and the leaders. It doesn't take long to see that there is a problem like abandoning team ball. There should be some barking and adjustments made to stop these swings while they are happening. To me, the team is what it is and the coaching staff is totally dropping the ball and unprepared to stop the raging waters.
Sorry to be so out of my usual Pollyanna "we can come back!" mode but this last game finally got to me.
by pyro on Jan 10, 2007 11:13 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: pyro on fire!
by Rhondda Nunes on Jan 10, 2007 1:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
this sucks
And that stems from coaching. The definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing and expect different results. Well, we keep doing the same thing, and are expecting different results, and we still come out flat, one-on-one, and totally different than we did 15 minutes previous.
You know how to fix it? Start your 5 end of the bench guys at the start of the second half. Tell them to run the offense. They would kill for some PT, and im sure run the offense to make sure they continued to get run.
If your first unit is not getting it done, then sit them down until they do.
by Chris The Greek on Jan 10, 2007 11:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Re: this sucks
And I agree with you, Chris, coaching is certainly part of this. Athletic teams are always (partly) a reflection of the coaching staff. This team has been undisciplined and unfocused the entire year. Lack of preparation has to receive some of the blame. Generally, the Kings play 30 - 35 minutes out of a 48 minute game. Their record is a reflection of that reality. (Yeah, I realize that we don't have a superstar, but we do have - on paper - a handful of very nice players.)
by Kusian on Jan 10, 2007 12:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: this sucks
That might be the most frustrating thing about this team. No basketball team is going to play 48 solid minutes of basketball, the idea is ludicrous. A good team will put together 35 minutes or so of good basketball and adequate basketball for the remainder. This type of performance will generally put a team in position to win almost every night.
What the Kings manage to pull off is 30 to 35 minutes of good, solid basketball, and about 15 minutes of the most horrendous NBA play you will ever see. And that's what kills me about this team - you can see them absolutely dominate their opponent for some period of time every night. How they manage to piss away that kind of performance in such a short period of time is amazing.
by otis29 on Jan 10, 2007 1:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: this sucks
Yeah, that's spot on....if the King's just play a mediocre 3rd, then they win the game. Instead, it's a total diaster.
Well said.
by Kusian on Jan 10, 2007 1:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
& to build on that point....
by Rhondda Nunes on Jan 10, 2007 4:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














