The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
I'm glad I didn't read The Bee until after I wrote my impressions of the game:
"If that's how they want to be, there's nothing I can do about it," he said. "I'm going to go out there and play the way I can. And if they don't like it, then that's them."
When the boo birds came out, the Kings:
- ...had lost eight of the last nine,
- ...stood a game below .500 at home,
- ...sat eight games under .500 on the season,
- ...were in sole possessions of last place in the division,
- ...had the seventh worst record in the entire NBA,
- ...were losing to a mediocre Eastern Conference team without two of their starters at home by 20 points, and
- ...were showing less effort than Rosie O'Donnell did preparing for the Boston Marathon.
This comment infuriates me more than anything Ron Artest has ever done in purple. It almost makes me hope when the trades start to fall (which they will, barring a miracle run over the next month) that Bibby is shipped to a truly angry city, like Philadelphia or Boston. Let's see how you feel about being booed then, boss.
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
If that's the case I don't see any team giving up much for him, esecially if the Kings don't want any long-term salary. Something like this, maybe.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2007 9:43 AM PST reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
On Bibby opting out: it was inevitable if he had a typical Bibby year (20 ppg on 45% shooting, 6 apg). He's had an awful year. He could still command maybe $50 million over 5 years, maybe more. But he's owed $28 million the next two years. I don't know how much winning means to him and how the perilous immediate future in Sacramento figures in. Right now, it's a toss-up on his opt-out clause.
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
- The team is consistently losing and in ugly fashions too.
- Bibby hasn't been productive (WOW that was a surprise </sarcasm>)
- He would leave 27 million bucks on the table, where he could perhaps play the final two years out and win.
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
by chupacabra on Jan 23, 2007 10:23 AM PST reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
by Rhondda Nunes on Jan 23, 2007 11:49 AM PST up reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
by Reverend John on Jan 23, 2007 10:25 AM PST reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
Reason being, I devote too much time to watching, rooting, and talking about the Kings to sit down and watch crap effort.
Could you picture Team Dime in Philly with their own Marty Mac, Screamin A Smith?
by Chris The Greek on Jan 23, 2007 12:40 PM PST reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
by Observer on Jan 23, 2007 12:56 PM PST reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
Cleveland!
by your friendly BullsBlogger on Jan 23, 2007 1:52 PM PST up reply actions
Just to be contrary-wise
I'm not saying the fans don't have the right to vocally complain. Their money - their choice. I have a more romantic Turner Classic Movie view of how to behave at a game. To me, if you are a fan - you sign on to be there and support the team even when they suck. IMO, it would be much more effective for those attending to cheer them on when down by 20. I recall Sacramento fans bragging about being the best die-hard fans in the league who would never boo. Leaving early used to be taboo too. Maybe we are letting go of one more thing that, win or lose, made us special. Maybe as fans we are sucking more than the team is this season and if we keep it up WE will be traded.
by pyro on Jan 23, 2007 1:40 PM PST reply actions
Re: Just to be contrary-wise
Here's another way to look at it. Bibby essentially says "I'm going to play the way I play regardless of the fans." In the next breath, he's criticizing fans for booing. Well, Mike: I'm going to boo the way I want to boo. Deal with it.
Honestly, the only thing I boo at a game is a bad call or when an opposing player or coach goes nuts. I've never booed the home team. But I don't think any fan has a responsibility not to boo, especially when they were watching that assbeating last night. It's each fan's choice. You and I don't boo, some others do. I don't think less of them.
Bibby's sense of entitlement despite really uninspired performance is mindboggling.
Re: Just to be contrary-wise
But hearing a professional athlete complain that the home fans booed is ridiculous. Whether you think it or not, keep it in the locker room. It makes you look like an ass.
What could he have said to answer the question? "I can't blame them, we were stinking up the joint". And they were indeed straight up putrid for most of that game.
The Rise Guys made a rare good point this morning. The Sacramento fans have a tendency to boo bad shot selection. They don't sit there and boo every game, at every timeout. It's not like there have been more than a handful of occasions in the franchise's history that the fans have really gotten on this team...I think they should be cut some slack. At least, they have earned it over time, whereas this team hasn't done anything to show they are deserving of praise.
Don't forget, the ticket prices for this team are some of the highest in the league. The product this season rarely gives the fans fair value for their out of pocket costs. So a little bit of booing doesn't bother me a bit. Bibby should go play like crap on an East Coast team. I suspect then he'd be longing for these horrible Sacramento fans.
Re: Just to be contrary-wise
I don't think Mike complained at all. Or acted entitled. Grant baited Mike by asking him what he thought of the boos. He, Grant, knew quite well that Mike was quoted just last week stating the boos at home bothered him. I can't think of anyone in the NBA who would have said anything brilliant in Mike's position. Kobe would have likely laughed it off - on the outside. Or blamed someone else. Mike basically said "it is what it is."
I do agree that the fans can boo if they wish. I had hoped after they were half way to getting back into it they would have heard some cheers during a time-out in the fourth but the crowd wasn't ready to praise them quite yet and remained silent. I thought they deserved some props and support after a good stretch. Hehe - stop the bleeding - stop the boos. A new motto!
I do not agree with booing the Kings because we expect them to play at a level that is equal to the price of admission. The prices are set before the season and remain because the season ticket holders don't get breaks. If we had fair value, we would be first place in the Pacific at the very least. Our nosebleeds are $40 and no one is offering package deals here like in just about every other city. So, what is fair admission to see Jason Kidd score a triple double or see the Kings come back from 20 down to win? I certainly agree that next year the prices should drop based on this year's results. Totally different topic, really.
by pyro on Jan 23, 2007 8:07 PM PST up reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
SCREW Mike Bibby for not giving a damn that Kings fans booed. SCREW Mike Bibby for playing every game this season despite reports saying that he was going to sit out the first three weeks with an injury. SCREW Mike Bibby for scoring one point last night and then scoring the last 15 points including the game winning shot.
What is it with you people? Bibby has one bad year, plays the whole year hurt, has to deal with a new coach, has to deal with rumors he doesn't get along with Ron Artest, and you guys want to dump the guy. You know what? At times, I haven't been all that thrilled with Bibby sometimes this season, but my frustration goes beyond just him because you can't fault the Kings' record this year on just one guy.
This Kings' team has no identity. And it's not any one particular players' job to step up and make the team play like that player plays. It's the front office. The Collangelo's made the Suns what they are when they brought in Mike D'antoni and Steve Nash. Everyone knows what the Suns are about. Everyone knows what Detroit was about thanks to Joe Dumars, Larry Brown and the way that team was constructed.
We need an identity. And it's not Bibby's job, it's not Artest's job. IF we're going to be a defensive team then yes, we better get a point guard who is better defensively than Mike Bibby. If we're going to be an offensive squad, then we better get a true scorer and deal Artest if we have to.
But SCREW Mike Bibby if Artest gets traded, right? It's not like he hasn't been a King for the last six years. It's not like he hasn't bailed the Kings out countless times with the big shot (which is what leaders do). It's not like he hasn't TRIED to get himself out of this slump. Clearly, a number of things are effecting his performance this year, but SCREW Mike Bibby, right?
by bballblog on Jan 23, 2007 1:43 PM PST reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
by pyro on Jan 23, 2007 1:56 PM PST up reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
I've loved Bibby through the years. He has been consistently overlooked among the league's best point guards, and he's certainly been the most consistent clutch performer the Kings have ever had.
But when he starts questioning the fans for booing a team that's down 20 against a mediocre team and has shown a lack of focus and effort much of the year? That's severely misguided entitlement. He hasn't earned a free pass, none of those players have. Fans have the right to voice displeasure.
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
But in the grand scheme of things, I'm tired of seeing "loyal" Kings fans dump on Bibby time after time when he bails us out 3-4 times A YEAR like he did last night.
He never be all world defense. But he can make key plays defensively - see last year's steal against the Spurs in game 3 which set up K-Mart's lay-up.
But when talking about this year specifically, consider everything when it comes to Bibby and what he's had to deal with before jumping on him. The dude is the only King on the team to play all 39 games.
by bballblog on Jan 23, 2007 2:56 PM PST up reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
Look, Bibby is not that great of a defensive player. It's pointless to keep harping on it. But I guarantee you if you check the records since Mike has joined the team he's hit more game winners or important shots than anyone on the team, even before the 2001 Kings core was broken up in 2004-2005.
The hating on Bibby is ridiculous. He'll never be a great defensive player. EVERYONE knows that. To think he's solely responsible for whenever the other team scores a basket or we have a big defecit is ridiculous.
by bballblog on Jan 24, 2007 10:37 PM PST up reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
But the fact is, until this team gets a true shot blocker, Bibby is a huge liability on defense. Not a small liability, but a HUGE liability. If you don't think that's important, I don't know what else I can say.
If he is not scoring the basketball he is pretty much useless on the court. What else does he really give you? He's a one-dimensional player, and making a game winning shot once or twice per year doesn't change that.
Once C-Webb and Vlade left this team, he became the defacto team leader. Plus he is the highest paid player on the team. His game doesn't merit either of those being a reality.
It's not being a "hater", it's being a realist.
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
... so this is Bibby's fault because we don't have a true shot blocker?
Not every single offense in the NBA starts and ends with the point guard. Dwyane Wade, LeBron James, Carmelo Anthony are just three players who dominate the ball more than the point guard. Bibby doesn't guard those guys last I checked.
Blame Geoff Petrie then, not Bibby. There's only three players on the Kings right now who are worth a damn defensively. (Artest, Salmons and Garcia, and I'm starting to think Artest is overrated at times, steals leader or not)
[[Bibby is a huge liability on defense. Not a small liability, but a HUGE liability. If you don't think that's important, I don't know what else I can say.]]
Of course I think it's important. But until our team is 100% defensive minded, and that's our identity, should we really be pinning it all on Bibby? Every player on the team is accountable. We've had maybe 5 or 6 good defensive games all year.
[[He's a one-dimensional player, and making a game winning shot once or twice per year doesn't change that.]]
He's 21st in the league in assists. Should his number be higher? He doesn't dominate the ball like most of the players in the top ten do. We all know Artest gets his share of ball handling time, so does Garcia, and so does Salmons.
The only way that number is going to go up is if less handling time is given to Artest. That isn't going to happen.
[[Once C-Webb and Vlade left this team, he became the defacto team leader. Plus he is the highest paid player on the team. His game doesn't merit either of those being a reality.]]
Do you remember the game the day before Thanksgiving where Bibby and the Kings were absolutely TEARING the Jazz up in the first half?
The box score doesn't reflect the impact Bibby had on that game, but ask Coach Jerry Sloan what he thinks if Bibby ends up playing the 2nd half of that game.
[[It's not being a "hater", it's being a realist.]]
shrug Call it what you want to. But remember, Bibby is the only King to play every single game this year. He has a new coach, has had to deal with Artest, AND has been hurt since the 2nd or 3rd week of preseason. I think some slack should be given to the guy, honestly. Most players (see Gasol, Pau or Carter, Vince) would have been publically moping around, trying to get themselves traded in a situation like this, especially when the Kings are grossly underachieving. Not Bibby.
That's a leader.
by bballblog on Jan 25, 2007 1:42 PM PST up reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
No, it's not Bibby's fault that he has no shot blocker behind him. Definitely Petrie's fault. But then it's also Petrie's fault that he doesn't have a defensive minded point guard since he has no shot blocker. Thus, Bibby needs to go OR they need to get a shot blocker (and we know how those grow on trees).
Should we be pinning it all on Mike Bibby? No, but I'm good with 90% blame. It doesn't matter as much if Shareef or Brad are horrible defenders - their man is rarely initiating the offense. If you think that stopping dribble penetration isn't a hugely important aspect of the team defensive concept, then you're crazy.
He may be 21st in assists per game, but he's 33rd in assists per 48, and 35th in assist to turnover ratio. Sorry, not overly impressive for a starting PG in the NBA.
I will give you the fact that Ron-Ron and Salmons and Cisco bring the ball up quite a bit. Maybe if Mike Bibby were a better distributor, that wouldn't have to be the case.
And I don't give too much credence to a guy playing every game - they get paid damn good money to perform. I'd rather he take some time off and get healthy if his injury is affecting his shot - because there isn't much more he gives you in a game.
Look, I don't hate Mike Bibby - I just think he's wildly overrated in the mind of most Kings fans. You give me anecdotal evidence of a few games he's made a big shot and one half of basketball against the Utah Jazz, and I give you a 17-23 team that has 24 of its last 42 games on the road (where they are a shiny 5-12 so far this season.)
If he's such a great leader, where exactly would you say he's leading us?
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
I'm thrilled that he makes a big shot once in a while, I just worry that HE HAS TO because he's single handedly destroyed the team defense all game.
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
by Observer on Jan 23, 2007 2:18 PM PST up reply actions
Re: The Truly Insane King: Mike Bibby
by chupacabra on Jan 23, 2007 6:45 PM PST reply actions

by 

















